Revisiting the Intriguing Electronic Features of the BeOBeC Carbyne and Some Isomers: A Quantum-Chemical Assessment

Extensive high-level quantum-chemical calculations reveal that the rod-shaped molecule BeOBeC, which was recently generated in matrix experiments, exists in two nearly isoenergetic states, the ⁵Σ quintet (⁵ 6 ) and the ³Σ triplet (³ 6 ). Their IR features are hardly distinguishable at finite temperature. The major difference concerns the mode of spin coupling between the terminal beryllium and carbon atoms. Further, the ground-state potential-energy surface of the [2Be,C,O] system at 4 K is presented and differences between the photochemical and thermal behaviors are highlighted. Finally, a previously not considered, so far unknown C_2v-symmetric rhombus-like four-membered ring ³[Be(O)(C)Be] (³ 5 ) is predicted to represent the global minimum on the potential-energy surface.     

Density functional theory and RRKM calculations of decompositions of the metastable E‐2,4‐pentadienal molecular ions

The potential energy profiles for the fragmentations that lead to [C₅H₅O]⁺ and [C₄H₆]^+? ions from the molecular ions [C₅H₆O]^+? of E‐2,4‐pentadienal were obtained from calculations at the UB3LYP/6‐311G + + (3df,3pd)//UB3LYP/6‐31G(d,p) level of theory. Kinetic barriers and harmonic frequencies obtained by the density functional method were then employed in Rice–Ramsperger–Kassel–Marcus calculations of individual rate coefficients for a large number of reaction steps. The pre‐equilibrium and rate‐controlling step approximations were applied to different regions of the complex potential energy surface, allowing the overall rate of decomposition to be calculated and discriminated between three rival pathways: C? H bond cleavage, decarbonylation and cyclization. These processes should have to compete for an equilibrated mixture of four conformers of the E‐2,4‐pentadienal ions. The direct dissociation, however, can only become important in the high‐energy regime. In contrast, loss of CO and cyclization are observable processes in the metastable kinetic window. The former involves a slow 1,2‐hydrogen shift from the carbonyl group that is immediately followed by the formation of an ion‐neutral complex which, in turn, decomposes rapidly to the s‐trans‐1,3‐butadiene ion [C₄H₆]^+?. The predominating metastable channel is the second one, that is, a multi‐step ring closure which starts with a rate‐limiting cis—trans isomerization. This process yields a mixture of interconverting pyran ions that dissociates to the pyrylium ions [C₅H₅O]⁺. These results can be used to rationalize the CID mass spectrum of E‐2,4‐pentadienal in a low‐energy regime. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Density functional theory and RRKM calculations of the gas‐phase unimolecular rearrangements of methylfuran and pyran ions before fragmentations

The potential energy profiles for the mutual conversion of the isomeric molecular ions [C₅H₆O]^+? of 2‐methylfuran, 3‐methylfuran and 4H‐pyran and the fragmentations that lead to [C₅H₅O]⁺ ions were obtained from calculations at the B3LYP/6‐311G + + (3df,3pd)//B3LYP/6‐31G(d,p) level of theory. The various competing unimolecular processes were characterized by their RRKM microcanonical rate coefficients, k(E), using the sets of reactant and transition state frequencies and the kinetic barriers obtained from the density functional method. In either a high‐ or a low‐energy regime, the pyrylium ion [C₅H₅O]⁺ is generated directly from the 4H‐pyran molecular ion by a simple cleavage. In contrast, in the metastable kinetic window, the molecular ions of methylfurans irreversibly isomerize to a mixture of interconverting structures before dissociation, which includes the 2H‐ and 3H‐pyran ions. The hydrogen atoms attached to saturated carbons of the pyran rings are very stabilizing at the position 2, but they are very labile at position 3 and can be shifted to adjacent positions. Once 4H‐pyran ion has been formed, the C? H bond cleavage begins before any hydrogen shift occurs. According to our calculation, there would not be complete H scrambling preceding the dissociation of the molecular ions [C₅H₆O]^+?. On the other hand, as the internal energy of the 2‐methylfuran molecular ion increases, H^? loss can become more important. These results agree with the available experimental data. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Reaction of the Pincer‐type Ligand {2, 6‐[P(O)(OEt)2]2‐4‐tert‐Bu‐C6H2}— with [Ph3C]+[PF6]—. Unprecedented Rearrangement and Carbon‐Carbon Bond Formation

The reaction of the organolithium derivative {2, 6‐[P(O)(OEt)₂]₂‐4‐tert‐Bu‐C₆H₂}Li ( 1 ‐Li) with [Ph₃C]⁺[PF₆]^— gave the substituted biphenyl derivative 4‐[(C₆H₅)₂CH]‐4′‐[tert‐Bu]‐2′, 6′‐[P(O)(OEt)₂]₂‐1, 1′‐biphenyl ( 5 ) which was characterized by ¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X‐ray analysis. Ab initio MO‐calculations reveal the intramolecular O···C distances in 5 of 2.952(4) and 2.988(5)Å being shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of oxygen and carbon to be the result of crystal packing effects. Also reported are the synthesis and structure of the bromine‐substituted derivative {2, 6‐[P(O)(OEt)₂]₂‐4‐tert‐Bu]C₆H₂}Br ( 9 ) and the structure of the protonated ligand 5‐tert‐Bu‐1, 3‐[P(O)(OEt)₂]₂C₆H₃ ( 1 ‐H). The structures of 1 ‐H, 5 , and 9 are compared with those of related metal‐substituted derivatives.     

Reactivity of an N,N‐Chelated Germylene Toward Substituted Alkynes,Alkenes, and Allenes

Treatment of N,N‐chelated germylene [(iPr)₂NB(N‐2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃)₂]Ge ( 1 ) with ferrocenyl alkynes containing carbonyl functionalities, FcC≡CC(O)R, resulted in [2+2+2] cyclization and formation of the respective ferrocenylated 3‐Fc‐4‐C(O)R‐1,2‐digermacyclobut‐3‐enes 2 – 4 [R = Me ( 2 ), OEt ( 3 ) and NMe₂ ( 4 )] bearing intact carbonyl substituents. In contrast, the reaction between 1 and PhC(O)C≡CC(O)Ph led to activation of both C≡C and C=O bonds producing bicyclic compound containing two five‐membered 1‐germa‐2‐oxacyclopent‐3‐ene rings sharing one C–C bond, 4,8‐diphenyl‐3,7‐dioxa‐2,6‐digermabicyclo[3.3.0]octa‐4,8‐diene ( 5 ). With N‐methylmaleimide containing an analogous C(O)CH=CHC(O) fragment, germylene 1 reacted under [2+2+2] cyclization involving the C=C double bond, producing 1,2‐digermacyclobutane 6 with unchanged carbonyl moieties. Finally, 1 selectively added to the terminal double bond in allenes CH₂=C=CRR′ giving rise to 3‐(=CRR′)‐1,2‐digermacyclobutanes [R/R′ = Me/Me ( 7 ), H/OMe ( 8 )] bearing an exo‐C=C double bond. All compounds were characterized by ¹H, ¹³C{¹H} NMR, IR and Raman spectroscopy and the molecular structures of 3 , 4 , 5 , and 8 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. The redox behavior of ferrocenylated derivatives 2 – 4 was studied by cyclic voltammetry.     

A concise and efficient synthesis of amino‐substituted (1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl)pyrimidine hybrids: synthetic sequence and the molecular and supramolecular structures of six examples

A concise and efficient synthesis of a series of amino‐substituted benzimidazole–pyrimidine hybrids has been developed, starting from the readily available N⁴‐(2‐aminophenyl)‐6‐methoxy‐5‐nitrosopyrimidine‐2,4‐diamine. In each of N⁵‐benzyl‐6‐methoxy‐4‐(2‐phenyl‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl)pyrimidine‐2,5‐diamine, C₂₅H₂₂N₆O, (I), 6‐methoxy‐N⁵‐(4‐methoxybenzyl)‐4‐[2‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidine‐2,5‐diamine, C₂₇H₂₆N₆O₃, (III), 6‐methoxy‐N⁵‐(4‐nitrobenzyl)‐4‐[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidine‐2,5‐diamine, C₂₅H₂₀N₈O₅, (IV), the molecules are linked into three‐dimensional framework structures, using different combinations of N—H…N, N—H…O, C—H…O, C—H…N and C—H…π hydrogen bonds in each case. Oxidative cleavage of 6‐methoxy‐N⁵‐(4‐methylbenzyl)‐4‐[2‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidine‐2,5‐diamine, (II), with diiodine gave 6‐methoxy‐4‐[2‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidine‐2,5‐diamine, which crystallized as a monohydrate, C₁₉H₁₈N₆O·H₂O, (V), and reaction of (V) with trifluoroacetic acid gave two isomeric products, namely N‐{5‐amino‐6‐methoxy‐6‐[2‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidin‐2‐yl}‐2,2,2‐trifluoroacetamide, which crystallized as an ethyl acetate monosolvate, C₂₁H₁₇F₃N₆O₂·C₄H₈O₂, (VI), and N‐{2‐amino‐6‐methoxy‐4‐[2‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidin‐5‐yl}‐2,2,2‐trifluoroacetamide, which crystallized as a methanol monosolvate, C₂₁H₁₇F₃N₆O₂·CH₄O, (VIIa). For each of (V), (VI) and (VIIa), the supramolecular assembly is two‐dimensional, based on different combinations of O—H…N, N—H…O, N—H…N, C—H…O and C—H…π hydrogen bonds in each case. Comparisons are made with some related structures.     

Ligand‐Exchange Processes on Solvated Beryllium Cations. Part III

On the basis of DFT calculations (B3LYP/6‐311+G**), the possibility to include solvent effects is considered in the investigation of the H₂O‐exchange mechanism on [Be(H₂O)₄]²⁺ within the widely used cluster approach. The smallest system in the gas phase, [Be(H₂O)₄(H₂O)]²⁺, shows the highest activation barrier of +15.6 kcal/mol, whereas the explicit addition of five H‐bonded H₂O molecules in [{Be(H₂O)₄(H₂O)}(H₂O)₅]²⁺ reduces the barrier to +13.5 kcal/mol. Single‐point calculations applying CPCM (B3LYP(CPCM:H₂O)/6‐311+G**//B3LYP/6‐311+G**) on [Be(H₂O)₄(H₂O)]²⁺ lower the barrier to +9.6 kcal/mol. Optimization of the precursor and transition state of [Be(H₂O)₄(H₂O)]²⁺ within an implicit model (B3LYP(CPCM:H₂O)/6‐311+G** or B3LYP(PCM:H₂O)/6‐311+G**) reduces the activation energy further to +8.3 kcal/mol but does not lead to any local minimum for the precursor and is, therefore, unfavorable.     

Chiral one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded architectures constructed from single‐enantiomer phosphoric triamides

The two single‐enantiomer phosphoric triamides N‐(2,6‐difluorobenzoyl)‐N′,N′′‐bis[(S)‐(−)‐α‐methylbenzyl]phosphoric triamide, [2,6‐F₂‐C₆H₃C(O)NH][(S)‐(−)‐(C₆H₅)CH(CH₃)NH]₂P(O), denoted L‐1 , and N‐(2,6‐difluorobenzoyl)‐N′,N′′‐bis[(R)‐(+)‐α‐methylbenzyl]phosphoric triamide, [2,6‐F₂‐C₆H₃C(O)NH][(R)‐(+)‐(C₆H₅)CH(CH₃)NH]₂P(O), denoted D‐1 , both C₂₃H₂₄F₂N₃O₂P, have been investigated. In their structures, chiral one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded architectures are formed along [100], mediated by relatively strong N—H…O(P) and N—H…O(C) hydrogen bonds. Both assemblies include the noncentrosymmetric graph‐set motifs R₂²(10), R₂¹(6) and C₂²(8), and the compounds crystallize in the chiral space group P1. Due to the data collection of L‐1 at 120 K and of D‐1 at 95 K, the unit‐cell dimensions and volume show a slight difference; the contraction in the volume of D‐1 with respect to that in L‐1 is about 0.3%. The asymmetric units of both structures consist of two independent phosphoric triamide molecules, with the main difference being seen in one of the torsion angles in the OPNHCH(CH₃)(C₆H₅) part. The Hirshfeld surface maps of these levo and dextro isomers are very similar; however, they are near mirror images of each other. For both structures, the full fingerprint plot of each symmetry‐independent molecule shows an almost asymmetric shape as a result of its different environment in the crystal packing. It is notable that NMR spectroscopy could distinguish between compounds L‐1 and D‐1 that have different relative stereocentres; however, the differences in chemical shifts between them were found to be about 0.02 to 0.001 ppm under calibrated temperature conditions. In each molecule, the two chiral parts are also different in NMR media, in which chemical shifts and P–H and P–C couplings have been studied.     

The structural,electronic, and magnetic properties of the stoichiometric (001) surface of double perovskite Sr2FeMoO6

The structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of the stoichiometric (001) surface of double perovskite Sr₂FeMoO₆ have been studied by using a 10‐layer FeMoO₄ and SrO terminated (001)‐oriented slab model and the first‐principles projector augmented wave potential within the generalized gradient approximation as well as taking into account the on‐site Coulomb repulsive (U = 2.0 eV for Fe and 1.0 eV for Mo). An outwards relaxation is observed for several layers near surface, and the accompanying layer rumpling has a decrease tend from surface layer to inner layer. Along Fe–O–Mo–O–Fe or Mo–O–Fe–O–Mo chains, the oxygen atom is closer to the adjacent Mo atom than to the adjacent Fe atom. In FeO₆ or MoO₆ octahedra, the two axial TM?O bonds are not equal, and especially, the surface dangling bond makes the remaining one axial TM?O bond slightly shorter than four equally equatorial TM?O bonds. The half‐metallic nature and a complete (100%) spin polarization character ensure the FeMoO₄ and SrO terminated (001)‐oriented slab of double perovskite Sr₂FeMoO₆ a potential application in spintronics devices. The Fe⁺³ and Mo⁺⁵ ions are still in the (3d⁵, S = 5/2) and (4d¹, S = 1/2) states with positive and negative magnetic moments respectively and thus antiferromagnetic coupling via oxygen between them. There is no direct interaction between two nearest Fe–Fe or Mo–Mo pairs, whereas the hybridizations between Fe 3d and 4s, O 2s and 2p, as well as Mo 4d, 5s and 5p orbitals are fairly significant. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Reduced 3,4′‐bipyrazoles from a simple pyrazole precursor: synthetic sequence,molecular structures and supramolecular assembly

The reaction of 5‐chloro‐3‐methyl‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐4‐carbaldehyde and N‐benzylmethylamine under microwave irradiation gives 5‐[benzyl(methyl)amino]‐3‐methyl‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐4‐carbaldehyde, C₁₉H₁₉N₃O, (I). Subsequent reactions under basic conditions, between (I) and a range of acetophenones, yield the corresponding chalcones. These undergo cyclocondensation reactions with hydrazine to produce reduced bipyrazoles which can be N‐formylated with formic acid or N‐acetylated with acetic anhydride. The structures of (I) and of representative examples from this reaction sequence are reported, namely the chalcone (E )‐3‐{5‐[benzyl(methyl)amino]‐3‐methyl‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl}‐1‐(4‐bromophenyl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐one, C₂₇H₂₄BrN₃O, (II), the N‐formyl derivative (3RS )‐5′‐[benzyl(methyl)amino]‐3′‐methyl‐1′,5‐diphenyl‐3,4‐dihydro‐1′H ,2H‐[3,4′‐bipyrazole]‐2‐carbaldehyde, C₂₈H₂₇N₅O, (III), and the N‐acetyl derivative (3RS )‐2‐acetyl‐5′‐[benzyl(methyl)amino]‐5‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐3′‐methyl‐1′‐phenyl‐3,4‐dihydro‐1′H ,2H‐[3,4′‐bipyrazole], which crystallizes as the ethanol 0.945‐solvate, C₃₀H₃₁N₅O₂·0.945C₂H₆O, (IV). There is significant delocalization of charge from the benzyl(methyl)amino substituent onto the carbonyl group in (I), but not in (II). In each of (III) and (IV), the reduced pyrazole ring is modestly puckered into an envelope conformation. The molecules of (I) are linked by a combination of C—H…N and C—H…π(arene) hydrogen bonds to form a simple chain of rings; those of (III) are linked by a combination of C—H…O and C—H…N hydrogen bonds to form sheets of R ²₂(8) and R ⁶₆(42) rings, and those of (IV) are linked by a combination of O—H…N and C—H…O hydrogen bonds to form a ribbon of edge‐fused R ²₄(16) and R ⁴₄(24) rings.     

Protonation of Nitramines: Where Does the Proton Go?

The reactions of nitramine, N ‐methyl nitramine, and N ,N ‐dimethyl nitramine with anhydrous HF and the superacids HF/MF₅ (M=As, Sb) were investigated at temperatures below −40 °C. In solution, exclusive O‐protonation was observed by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. Whereas no solid product could be isolated from the neat HF solutions even at −78 °C, in the HF/MF₅ systems, protonated nitramine MF₆⁻ salts were isolated for the first time as moisture‐sensitive solids that decompose at temperatures above −40 °C. In the solid state, depending on the counterion, O‐protonated or N‐protonated cations can be formed, in accord with theoretical calculations which show that the energy differences between O‐protonation and N‐protonation are very small. The salts [H₂N‐NO₂H][AsF₆], [H₃N‐NO₂][SbF₆], [MeHNNO₂H][SbF₆], and [Me₂NNO₂H][SbF₆] were characterized by their X‐ray crystal structures.     

How the oxazole fragment influences the conformation of the tetraoxazocane ring in a cyclohexanespiro‐3′‐(1,2,4,5,7‐tetraoxazocane): single‐crystal X‐ray and theoretical study

Single crystals of (2S,5R)‐2‐isopropyl‐5‐methyl‐7‐(5‐methylisoxazol‐3‐yl)cyclohexanespiro‐3′‐(1,2,4,5,7‐tetraoxazocane), C₁₆H₂₆N₂O₅, have been studied via X‐ray diffraction. The tetraoxazocane ring adopts a boat–chair conformation in the crystalline state, which is due to intramolecular interactions. Conformational analysis of the tetraoxazocane fragment performed at the B3LYP/6‐31G(d,2p) level of theory showed that there are three minima on the potential energy surface, one of which corresponds to the conformation realized in the solid state, but not to a global minimum. Analysis of the geometry and the topological parameters of the electron density at the (3,?1) bond critical points (BCPs), and the charge transfer in the tetraoxazocane ring indicated that there are stereoelectronic effects in the O—C—O and N—C—O fragments. There is a two‐cross hyperconjugation in the N—C—O fragment between the lone electron pair of the N atom (lpN) and the antibonding orbital of a C—O bond (σ*_C—O) and vice versa between lpO and σ*_C—N. The oxazole substituent has a considerable effect on the geometry and the topological parameters of the electron density at the (3,?1) BCPs of the tetraoxazocane ring. The crystal structure is stabilized via intermolecular C—H…N and C—H…O hydrogen bonds, which is unambiguously confirmed with PIXEL calculations, a quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) topological analysis of the electron density at the (3,?1) BCPs and a Hirshfeld analysis of the electrostatic potential. The molecules form zigzag chains in the crystal due to intermolecular C—H…N interactions being electrostatic in origin. The molecules are further stacked due to C—H…O hydrogen bonds. The dispersion component in the total stabilization energy of the crystal lattice is 68.09%.     

Nitric Oxide Insertion Reactivity with the Bismuth–Carbon Bond: Formation of the Oximate Anion, [ON(C6H2tBu2O)]−, from the Oxyaryl Dianion, (C6H2tBu2O)2−

The first example of NO insertion into a Bi?C bond has been found in the direct reaction of NO with a Bi³⁺ complex of the unusual (C₆H₂tBu₂‐3,5‐O‐4)^2? oxyaryl dianionic ligand, namely, Ar′Bi(C₆H₂tBu₂‐3,5‐O‐4) [Ar′=2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃] ( 1 ). The oximate complexes [Ar′Bi(ONC₆H₂‐3,5‐tBu₂‐4‐O)]₂(μ‐O) ( 3 ) and Ar′Bi(ONC₆H₂‐3,5‐tBu₂‐4‐O)₂ ( 4 ) were formed as a mixture, but can be isolated in pure form by reaction of NO with a Bi³⁺ complex of the [O₂C(C₆H₂tBu₂‐3‐5‐O‐4]^2? oxyarylcarboxy dianion, namely, Ar′Bi[O₂C(C₆H₂tBu₂‐3‐5‐O‐4)‐κ²O,O’]. Reaction of 1 with Ph₃CSNO gave an oximate product with (Ph₃CS)^1? as an ancillary ligand, (Ph₃CS)(Ar′)Bi(ONC₆H₂‐3,5‐tBu₂‐4‐O) ( 5 ).     

3‐Nitrophenol–4,4′‐bipyridyl N,N′‐dioxide (2/1): a DFT study and CSD analysis of DPNO molecular complexes

The title 2:1 complex of 3‐nitrophenol (MNP) and 4,4′‐bipyridyl N,N′‐dioxide (DPNO), 2C₆H₅NO₃·C₁₀H₈N₂O₂ or 2MNP·DPNO, crystallizes as a centrosymmetric three‐component adduct with a dihedral angle of 59.40 (8)° between the planes of the benzene rings of MNP and DPNO (the DPNO moiety lies across a crystallographic inversion centre located at the mid‐point of the C—C bond linking its aromatic rings). The complex owes its formation to O—H...O hydrogen bonds [O...O = 2.605 (3) Å]. Molecules are linked by intermolecular C—H...O and C—H...N interactions forming R₂¹(6) and R₂²(10) rings, and R₆⁶(34) and R₄⁴(26) macro‐rings, all of which are aligned along the [01] direction, and R₂²(10) and R₂¹(7) rings aligned along the [010] direction. The combination of chains of rings along the [01] and [010] directions generates the three‐dimensional structure. A total of 27 systems containing the DNPO molecule and forming molecular complexes of an organic nature were analysed and compared with the structural characteristics of the dioxide reported here. The N—O distance [1.325 (2) Å] depends not only on the interactions involving the O atom at the N—O group, but also on the structural ordering and additional three‐dimensional interactions in the crystal structure. A density functional theory (DFT) optimized structure at the B3LYP/6‐311G(d,p) level is compared with the molecular structure in the solid state.     

Zwitterionic λ5Si‐Silicates with SiO2S2C Skeletons: Syntheses and Structural Characterization in the Solid State

The zwitterionic λ⁵Si‐silicates [(dimethylammonio)methyl]bis[methanecarboxylatothiolato(2–)‐O,S]silicate ( 9 ) and bis[benzene‐1‐carboxylato‐2‐thiolato(2–)‐O,S][(dimethylammonio)methyl]silicate ( 10 ) were synthesized by treatment of the zwitterionic λ⁵Si‐tetrafluorosilicate F₄SiCH₂NMe₂H with two molar equivalents of Me₃SiSCH₂C(O)OSiMe₃ and 1,2‐Me₃SiS–C₆H₄–C(O)OSiMe₃, respectively (formation of four molar equivalents of Me₃SiF). Compounds 9 and 10 were characterized by elemental analyses (C, H, N, S) and solid‐state NMR studies (¹³C, ²⁹Si). In addition, compound 10 was structurally characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Synthesis of Branched Polyethylene by Tandem Catalysis

Linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) can be prepared by addition of ethylene to a mixture of two catalysts. In this “tandem catalysis” scheme one catalyst dimerizes or oligomerizes ethylene to α‐olefins while the second site incorporates these α‐olefins into a growing polyethylene chain. A variety of classical catalyst combinations are available for this purpose. Better control over the polymerization process, and therefore product properties, is attained by the use of homogenous “single site” catalysts. The best‐behaved tandem processes take advantage of well‐defined catalysts that require stoichiometric quantities of activators. One such system employs [(C₆H₅)₂PC₆H₄C(OB(C₆F₅)₃)O‐κ²P,O]Ni(η³‐CH₂CMeCH₂) and {[(η⁵‐C₅Me₄)SiMe₂(η¹‐NCMe₃)]TiMe}{MeB(C₆F₅)₃}. The nickel sites are responsible for converting ethylene to 1‐butene or mixtures of 1‐butene with 1‐hexene. These olefins are copolymerized with ethylene at the titanium sites. It is possible to obtain a linear correlation between the branching content in the polymer product and the Ni/Ti ratio. The effect of ligand substitution at nickel has also been investigated. When the benzyl derivative [(C₆H₅)₂PC₆H₄C(O‐B(C₆F₅)₃)O‐κ²P,O]Ni(η³‐CH₂C₆H₅) is used instead of the methallyl counterpart [(C₆H₅)₂PC₆H₄C(OB(C₆F₅)₃)O‐κ²P,O]Ni(η³‐CH₂CMeCH₂), one obtains, at a constant Ni/Ti ratio, considerably more branching in the final polymer structure. These results are rationalized in terms of a more efficient initiation when the more labile benzyl ligand is used.     

Phosphine (oxide)‐(thio) phenolate palladium complexes: Synthesis,characterization and (co)polymerization of norbornene

A series of palladium complexes ( 2a–2g ) ( 2a : [6‐^tBu‐2‐PPh₂‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2b : [6‐C₆F₅–2‐PPh₂‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2c : [6‐^tBu‐2‐PPh^tBu‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2d : [2‐PPh^tBu‐C₆H₄O] PdMe(Py); 2e : [6‐SiMe₃–2‐PPh₂‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2f : [2‐^tBu‐6‐(Ph₂P=O)‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2g : [6‐SiMe₃–2‐(Ph₂P=O)‐C₆H₃S]PdMe(Py)) bearing phosphine (oxide)‐(thio) phenolate ligand have been efficiently synthesized and characterized. The solid‐state structures of complexes 2d , 2f and 2g have been further confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, which revealed a square‐planar geometry of palladium center. In the presence of B(C₆F₅)₃, these complexes can be used as catalysts to polymerize norbornene (NB) with relatively high yields, producing vinyl‐addition polymers. Interestingly, 2a /B(C₆F₅)₃ system catalyzed the polymerization of NB in living polymerization manner at high temperature (polydispersity index 1.07, M_n up to 1.5 × 10⁴). The co‐polymerization of NB and polar monomers was also studied using catalysts 2a and 2f . All the obtained co‐polymers could dissolve in common solvent.     

Insight into Oxide‐Bridged Heterobimetallic Al/Zr Olefin Polymerization Catalysts

Reaction of (TBBP)AlMe ? THF with [Cp*₂Zr(Me)OH] gave [(TBBP)Al(THF)?O?Zr(Me)Cp*₂] (TBBP=3,3’,5,5’‐tetra‐tBu‐2,2'‐biphenolato). Reaction of [DIPPnacnacAl(Me)?O?Zr(Me)Cp₂] with [PhMe₂NH]⁺[B(C₆F₅)₄]^? gave a cationic Al/Zr complex that could be structurally characterized as its THF adduct [(DIPPnacnac)Al(Me)?O?Zr(THF)Cp₂]⁺[B(C₆F₅)₄]^? (DIPPnacnac=HC[(Me)C=N(2,6‐iPr₂?C₆H₃)]₂). The first complex polymerizes ethene in the presence of an alkylaluminum scavenger but in the absence of methylalumoxane (MAO). The adduct cation is inactive under these conditions. Theoretical calculations show very high energy barriers (ΔG=40–47 kcal mol^?1) for ethene insertion with a bridged AlOZr catalyst. This is due to an unfavorable six‐membered‐ring transition state, in which the methyl group bridges the metal and ethene with an obtuse metal‐Me‐C angle that prevents synchronized bond‐breaking and making. A more‐likely pathway is dissociation of the Al‐O‐Zr complex into an aluminate and the active polymerization catalyst [Cp*₂ZrMe]⁺.     

Amitriptylinium picrate: conformational disorder

In the structure of the title salt [systematic name: 3‐(10,11‐dihydro‐5H‐dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen‐5‐ylidene)‐N,N‐dimethylpropan‐1‐aminium 2,4,6‐trinitrophenolate] of a tricyclic antidepressant, C₂₀H₂₄N⁺·C₆H₂N₃O₇⁻, the dimethylaminopropyl subunit possesses a classical static conformational disorder. The central cycloheptadiene ring adopts a bent conformation that is intermediate between boat and chair forms, leading to a butterfly shape for the hetero‐tricyclic moiety. In a complementary fashion, donors from amitriptyline and acceptors from picrate form intermolecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds and N—H...O salt bridges. These hydrogen bonds cluster amitriptyline and picrate ions into a closed R₄⁴(36) hetero‐tetramer, whereas intermolecular C—H...π interactions between amitriptyline ions cluster them into homo‐dimers. Significant π–π stacking interactions are also observed between aromatic rings of amitriptyline and picrate, and these, combined with the C—H...π interactions, associate molecules into linear arrays along the [11] direction.     

Synthesis,Interionic Structure,and Reactivity toward CO and p‐Methylstyrene of Palladacyclic Compounds Bearing α‐Diimine Ligands

Palladacyclic compounds [Pd(C₆H₄(C₆H₅C?O)C?N? R)(N? N)] [X] (R = Et, ⁱPr, 2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃; N? N = bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine, or 1,4‐(o,o′‐dialkylaryl)‐1,4‐diazabuta‐1,3‐dienes; [X]^? = [BF₄]^? or [PF₆]^?) were synthesized from the dimers [{Pd(C₆H₄(C₆H₅C?O)C?N? R)(μ‐Cl)}₂] and N? N ligands. Their interionic structure in CD₂Cl₂ was determined by means of ¹⁹F,¹H‐HOESY experiments and compared with that in the solid state derived from X‐ray single‐crystal studies. [Pd(C₆H₄(C₆H₅C?O)C?N? R)(N? N)] [X] complexes were found to copolymerize CO and p‐methylstyrene affording syndiotactic or isotactic copolymers when bpy or 1,4‐(o,o′‐dimethylaryl)‐1,4‐diazabuta‐1,3‐dienes were used, respectively. The reactions with CO and p‐methylstyrene of the bpy derivatives were investigated. Two intermediates derived from a single and a double insertion of CO into the Pd? C bonds were isolated and completely characterized in solution.