L-fuzzy Q-convergence structures

In this paper, we construct a topological category of pretopological L-fuzzy Q-convergence spaces, which contains the category of topological L-fuzzy Q-convergence spaces as a bireflective full subcategory. Considering the connections with L-fuzzy topology, it is proved that the category of topological L-fuzzy Q-convergence spaces is isomorphic to the category of topological L-fuzzy quasi-coincident neighborhood spaces, and the latter is isomorphic to the category of L-fuzzy topological spaces. Moreover, we find that our pretopological L-fuzzy Q-convergence spaces can be characterized as a kind of L-fuzzy quasi-coincident neighborhood spaces, which is called strong L-fuzzy quasi-coincident neighborhood space.     

PreT 2 Objects in Topological Categories

In previous papers, two notions of pre-Hausdorff (PreT ₂) objects in a topological category were introduced and compared. The main objective of this paper is to show that the full subcategory of PreT ₂ objects is a topological category and all of T ₀, T ₁, and T ₂ objects in this topological category are equivalent. Furthermore, the characterizations of pre-Hausdorff objects in the categories of filter convergence spaces, (constant) local filter convergence spaces, and (constant) stack convergence spaces are given and as a consequence, it is shown that these categories are homotopically trivial.     

Conway’s Question: The Chase for Completeness

We study various degrees of completeness for a Tychonoff space X. One of them plays a central role, namely X is called a Conway space if X is sequentially closed in its Stone–?ech compactification β X (a prominent example of Conway spaces is provided by Dieudonné complete spaces). The Conway spaces constitute a bireflective subcategory Conw of the category Tych of Tychonoff spaces. Replacing sequential closure by the general notion of a closure operator C, we introduce analogously the subcategory Conw _C of C-Conway spaces, that turns out to be again a bireflective subcategory of Tych. We show that every bireflective subcategory of Tych can be presented in this way by building a Galois connection between bireflective subcategories of Tych and closure operators of Top finer than the Kuratowski closure. Other levels of completeness are considered for the (underlying topological spaces of) topological groups. A topological group G is sequentially complete if it is sequentially closed in its Ra?kov completion ${ \ifmmode\expandafter\tilde\else\expandafter\~\fi{G}}$ . The sequential completeness for topological groups is stronger than Conway’s property, although they coincide in some classes of topological groups, for example: free (Abelian) topological groups, pseudocompact groups, etc.     

On the Reflectivity and Coreflectivity of L-Fuzzifying Topological Spaces in L-Topological Spaces

In this paper it is proved that for all completely distributive lattices L, the category of L-fuzzifying topological spaces can be embedded in the category of L-topological spaces (stratified Chang-Goguen spaces) as a simultaneously bireflective and bicoreflective full subcategory. Received April 2, 1999, Revised January 31, 2000, Accepted February 2, 2000     

TOPOLOGICAL CATEGORIES AND CLOSURE OPERATORS

Abstract

It is shown that the category CS of closure spaces is a topological category. For each epireflective subcategory A of a topological category X a functor F _A :X → X is defined and used to extend to the general case of topological categories some results given in [4], [5] and [10] for epireflective subcategories of the category Top of topological spaces.     

Δ-spaces

We introduce the notion of a Δ-space and argue that a complete subcategory of the categoryTOP ₀of all topological T₀-spaces, defined by Δ-spaces, is a subdirectly closed subcategory ofTOP ₀that contains many of the known denotational semantic categories of topological spaces as subdirectly closed subcategories. As a consequence, the affirmative answer is given to Scott’s question which inquires whether the category of bifinite domains is a complete subdirectly closed subcategory ofEQU. Supported jointly by RFFR grant No. 96-0-00976 and by DFG grant No. 436-11312670. Translated fromAlgebra i Logika, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 667–679, November–December, 1999.     

PROXIMAL LIMIT SPACES

Abstract

The proximal limit spaces are introduced which fill the gap arising from the existence of proximity spaces, uniform spaces, and uniform limit spaces. It is shown that the proximal limit spaces can be considered as a bireflective subcategory of the topological category of uniform limit spaces. A limit space is induced by a proximal limit space if and only if it is a S₁-limit space.     

Locales as spectral spaces

A frame is a complete distributive lattice that satisfies the infinite distributive law ${b \wedge \bigvee_{i \in I} a_i = \bigvee_{i \in I} b \wedge a_i}$ b ∧ ? i ∈ I a i = ? i ∈ I b ∧ a i . The lattice of open sets of a topological space is a frame. The frames form a category Fr. The category of locales is the opposite category Fr ^op . The category BDLat of bounded distributive lattices contains Fr as a subcategory. The category BDLat is anti-equivalent to the category of spectral spaces, Spec (via Stone duality). There is a subcategory of Spec that corresponds to the subcategory Fr under the anti-equivalence. The objects of this subcategory are called locales, the morphisms are the localic maps; the category is denoted by Loc. Thus locales are spectral spaces. The category Loc is equivalent to the category Fr ^op . A topological approach to locales is initiated via the systematic study of locales as spectral spaces. The first task is to characterize the objects and the morphisms of the category Spec that belong to the subcategory Loc. The relationship between the categories Top (topological spaces), Spec and Loc is studied. The notions of localic subspaces and localic points of a locale are introduced and studied. The localic subspaces of a locale X form an inverse frame, which is anti-isomorphic to the assembly associated with the frame of open and quasi-compact subsets of X.     

Precosheaves of pro-sets and abelian pro-groups are smooth

Let D be the category of pro-sets (or abelian pro-groups). It is proved that for any Grothendieck site X, there exists a reflector from the category of precosheaves on X with values in D to the full subcategory of cosheaves. In the case of precosheaves on topological spaces, it is proved that any precosheaf is smooth, i.e. is locally isomorphic to a cosheaf. Constant cosheaves are constructed, and there are established connections with shape theory.     

Strong pro-fibrations and ANR objects in pro-categories

The notions of pro-fibration and approximate pro-fibration for morphisms in the pro-category pro-Top of topological spaces were introduced by S. Mardeši? and T.B. Rushing. In this paper we introduce the notion of strong pro-fibration, which is a pro-fibration with some additional property, and the notion of ANR object in pro-Top, which is approximately an ANR-system, and we consider the full subcategory ANR of pro-Top whose objects are ANR objects. We prove that the category ANR satisfies most of the axioms for fibration category in the sense of H.J. Baues if fibrations are strong pro-fibrations and weak equivalences are morphisms inducing isomorphisms in the pro-homotopy category pro-H(Top) of topological spaces. We give various applications. First of all, we prove that every shape morphism is represented by a strong pro-fibration. Secondly, the fibre of a strong pro-fibration is well defined in the category ANR, and we obtain an isomorphism between the pro-homotopy groups of the base and total systems of a strong pro-fibration, and hence obtain the pro-homotopy sequence of a strong pro-fibration. Finally, we also show that there is a homotopy decomposition in the category ANR.     

Tensor Products in Categories of Topological Spaces

In this paper symmetric monoidal closed structures on coreflective subcategories of the category of (Hausdorff) topological spaces are studied. We describe all such structures on the category of (Hausdorff) pseudoradial spaces and some of its subcategories and give an example of a coreflective subcategory of the category of Hausdorff topological spaces admitting a proper class of symmetric monoidal closed structures.     

A Topologist’s View of Chu Spaces

For a symmetric monoidal-closed category $\mathcal{X}$ and any object K, the category of K-Chu spaces is small-topological over $\mathcal{X}$ and small cotopological over $\mathcal{X}^{{{\text{op}}}}$ . Its full subcategory of $\mathcal{M}$ -extensive K-Chu spaces is topological over $\mathcal{X}$ when $\mathcal{X}$ is $\mathcal{M}$ -complete, for any morphism class $\mathcal{M}$ . Often this subcategory may be presented as a full coreflective subcategory of Diers’ category of affine K-spaces. Hence, in addition to their roots in the theory of pairs of topological vector spaces (Barr) and their connections with linear logic (Seely), the Dialectica categories (Hyland, de Paiva), and with the study of event structures for modeling concurrent processes (Pratt), Chu spaces seem to have a less explored link with algebraic geometry. We use the Zariski closure operator to describe the objects of the *-autonomous category of $\mathcal{M}$ -extensive and $\mathcal{M}$ -coextensive K-Chu spaces in terms of Zariski separation and to identify its important subcategory of complete objects.     

HAUSDORFF NEARNESS SPACES

Abstract

A categorical characterization of the category Haus of Hausdorft topological spaces within the category Top of topological spaces is given. A notion of a Hausdorff nearness space is then introduced and it is proved that the resulting subcategory Haus Near of the category Near of nearness spaces fulfills exactly the same characterization as derived for Haus in Top. Properties of Haus Near and relations to other important sub-categories of Near are studied.     

拓扑空间范畴、拓扑FUZZ范畴与拓扑分子格范畴间的反射与余反射

从整体角度出发，证明了拓扑空间范畴Ｔｏｐ分别是拓扑Ｆｕｚｚ范畴ＴｏｐＦｕｚ与拓扑分子格范畴ＴＭＬ的反射与余反射满子范畴，ＴｏｐＦｕｚ是ＴＭＬ的反射与余反射（非满）子范畴．     

On topologies generated by Moisil resemblance relations

In [8] and [9] Moisil has introduced the resemblance relations. Following [9] we associate to every resemblance relation an extensive operator which commutes with arbitrary unions of sets. We are leading to consider spaces endowed with such closure operators; we shall call these spaces total ?ech spaces (TC-spaces).TC-spaces are in one-to-one, onto correspondence with reflexive relations. TC-spaces generated by transitive relations are in one-to-one, onto correspondence with the total topological spaces of W. Hartnett (which are called total Kuratowski spaces, TK-spaces).We study the category of TC-spaces and its full subcategory determined by TK-spaces. Both categories are Cartesian closed, but they are not elementary toposes.     

The Absolute of a Topological Space and its Application to Abelian l-groups

We give a axiomatic treatment of the absolute in the category of all topological spaces and characterize it as a cover with respect to the full subcategory of extremally disconnected spaces. As an application, we obtain the strongly projectable hull of an abelian l-group as a unique lifting of the absolute of its spectrum. Dedicated to B. V. M.     

Constructions and applications of rigid spaces,I

The two major results proved are: (1) The category TOP of topological spaces contains a complete nonreflective subcategory. (2) Under the assumption (2^m)⁺ < 2^2m, for each infinite cardinal number m there exists a Hausdorff space of cardinality m, in which the identity map is the only nonconstant continuous self-map. The first result is proved as a consequence of another result which answers a question of Herrlich concerning strongly rigid spaces; it is then used to settle in the negative a conjecture concerning the characterization of reflective subcategories in TOP. In addition, several interesting spaces are constructed.     

A couple of triples

The standard contravariant adjunction between TOP (the category of topological spaces) and LAT (the category of distributive lattices) induces a triple Λ on LAT and a triple Σ on TOP. We show that the category LAT^Λ of Λ-algebras is just the category of frames, and describe the category TOP^Σ of Σ-algebras as a subcategory of TOP.