Mean–variance analysis of a single supplier and retailer supply chain under a returns policy

In the literature, most of the supply chain coordinating policies target at improving the supply chain’s efficiency in terms of expected cost reduction or expected profit improvement. However, optimizing the expected performance alone cannot guarantee that the realized performance measure will fall within a small neighborhood of its expected value when the corresponding variance is high. Moreover, it ignores the risk aversion of supply chain members which may affect the achievability of channel coordination. As a result, we carry out in this paper a mean–variance (MV) analysis of supply chains under a returns policy. We first propose an MV formulation for a single supplier single retailer supply chain with a newsvendor type of product. The objective of each supply chain decision maker is to maximize the expected profit such that the standard deviation of profit is under the decision maker’s control. We study both the cases with centralized and decentralized supply chains. We illustrate how a returns policy can be applied for managing the supply chains to address the issues such as channel coordination and risk control. Extensive numerical studies are conducted and managerial findings are proposed.     

Mean–variance portfolio selection under a constant elasticity of variance model

This paper discusses a mean–variance portfolio selection problem under a constant elasticity of variance model. A backward stochastic Riccati equation is first considered. Then we relate the solution of the associated stochastic control problem to that of the backward stochastic Riccati equation. Finally, explicit expressions of the optimal portfolio strategy, the value function and the efficient frontier of the mean–variance problem are expressed in terms of the solution of the backward stochastic Riccati equation.     

Mean and variance optimization of non–linear systems and worst–case analysis

In this paper, we consider expected value, variance and worst–case optimization of nonlinear models. We present algorithms for computing optimal expected value, and variance policies, based on iterative Taylor expansions. We establish convergence and consider the relative merits of policies based on expected value optimization and worst–case robustness. The latter is a minimax strategy and ensures optimal cover in view of the worst–case scenario(s) while the former is optimal expected performance in a stochastic setting. Both approaches are used with a small macroeconomic model to illustrate relative performance, robustness and trade-offs between the alternative policies.     

Mean–variance efficiency of DC pension plan under stochastic interest rate and mean-reverting returns

This paper studies the optimization problem of DC pension plan under mean–variance criterion. The financial market consists of cash, bond and stock. Similar to Guan and Liang (2014), we assume that the instantaneous interest rate is an affine process including the Cox–Ingersoll–Ross (CIR) model and Vasicek model. However, we assume that the expected return of the stock follows a completely different mean-reverting process, which can well display the bear and bull features of the market, and the market price of the stock index is the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. The pension manager thus has to undertake the risks of interest rate and market price of stock index. Besides, a special stochastic contribution rate is formulated. The goal of the pension manager is to maximize the expected terminal value and minimize the variance of terminal value. We will use the technique developed by Guan and Liang (2014) to tackle this problem and derive the closed-forms of efficient frontier and strategies. Numerical analysis is given in the end of this paper to show the economic behavior of the efficient frontier and strategies.     

Mean–variance target-based optimisation for defined contribution pension schemes in a stochastic framework

We solve a mean–variance optimisation problem in the accumulation phase of a defined contribution pension scheme. In a general multi-asset financial market with stochastic investment opportunities and stochastic contributions, we provide the general forms for the efficient frontier, the optimal investment strategy, and the ruin probability. We show that the mean–variance approach is equivalent to a “user-friendly” target-based optimisation problem which minimises a quadratic loss function, and provide implementation guidelines for the selection of the target. We show that the ruin probability can be kept under control through the choice of the target level. We find closed-form solutions for the special case of stochastic interest rate following the Vasiček (1977) dynamics, contributions following a geometric Brownian motion, and market consisting of cash, one bond and one stock. Numerical applications report the behaviour over time of optimal strategies and non-negative constrained strategies.     

An analysis of transaction costs in participating life insurance under mean–variance preferences

Transaction costs with respect to distribution and administration play a crucial role for the performance of participating life insurance products. The aim of this paper is to investigate the impact of such initial and annual transaction costs on policyholder mean–variance preferences depending on the contract features, comparing a point-to-point guarantee, a cliquet-style guarantee, and a money-back guarantee with annual surplus component. We extend previous work by deriving analytical solutions for the maximum allowed initial transaction costs as well as the risk aversion parameter that ensure a given customer preference level for different contract types. We further conduct simulation analyses to identify key factors in regard to transaction costs. One main finding is that in the present setting, insurers can indeed charge higher costs for more complex products with cliquet-style features, and that the difference in costs between the various product types increases considerably in a low interest-rate environment. However, these results are heavily impacted and even reversed depending on the risk–return asset characteristics, as insurers with a riskier asset management strategy may no longer be able to charge higher transaction costs for complex products with a strong annual cliquet-style surplus participation component without reducing their attractiveness to customers.     

Mean–variance portfolio and contribution selection in stochastic pension funding

In this paper we study the problem of simultaneous minimization of risks, and maximization of the terminal value of expected funds assets in a stochastic defined benefit aggregated pension plan. The risks considered are the solvency risk, measured as the variance of the terminal fund’s level, and the contribution risk, in the form of a running cost associated to deviations from the evolution of the stochastic normal cost. The problem is formulated as a bi-objective stochastic problem of mean–variance and it is solved with dynamic programming techniques. We find the efficient frontier and we show that the optimal portfolio depends linearly on the supplementary cost of the fund, plus an additional term due to the random evolution of benefits.     

Mean–variance asset–liability management: Cointegrated assets and insurance liability

The cointegration of major financial markets around the globe is well evidenced with strong empirical support. This paper considers the continuous-time mean–variance (MV) asset–liability management (ALM) problem for an insurer investing in an incomplete financial market with cointegrated assets. The number of trading assets is allowed to be less than the number of Brownian motions spanning the market. The insurer also faces the risk of paying uncertain insurance claims during the investment period. We assume that the cointegration market follows the diffusion limit of the error-correction model for cointegrated time series. Using the Markowitz (1952) MV portfolio criterion, we consider the insurer’s problem of minimizing variance in the terminal wealth, given an expected terminal wealth subject to interim random liability payments following a compound Poisson process. We generalize the technique developed by Lim (2005) to tackle this problem. The particular structure of cointegration enables us to solve the ALM problem completely in the sense that the solutions of the continuous-time portfolio policy and efficient frontier are obtained as explicit and closed-form formulas.     

Near-optimal mean–variance controls under two-time-scale formulations and applications

Although the mean–variance control was initially formulated for financial portfolio management problems in which one wants to maximize the expected return and control the risk, our motivations stem from highway vehicle platoon controls that aim to maximize highway utility while ensuring zero accident. This paper develops near-optimal mean–variance controls of switching diffusion systems. To reduce the computational complexity, with motivations from earlier work on singularly perturbed Markovian systems [Sethi and Zhang, Hierarchical Decision Making in Stochastic Manufacturing Systems, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1994; Yin and Zhang, Continuous-Time Markov Chains and Applications: A Singular Pertubation Approach, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998 and Yin et al., Ann. Appl. Probab. 10 (2000), pp. 549–572], we use a two-time-scale formulation to treat the underlying system, which is represented by the use of a small parameter. As the small parameter goes to 0, we obtain a limit problem. Using the limit problem as a guide, we construct controls for the original problem, and show that the control so constructed is nearly optimal.     

Optimality of excess-loss reinsurance under a mean–variance criterion

In this paper, we study an insurer’s reinsurance–investment problem under a mean–variance criterion. We show that excess-loss is the unique equilibrium reinsurance strategy under a spectrally negative Lévy insurance model when the reinsurance premium is computed according to the expected value premium principle. Furthermore, we obtain the explicit equilibrium reinsurance–investment strategy by solving the extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation.     

Mean–variance asset–liability management with asset correlation risk and insurance liabilities

Consider an insurer who invests in the financial market where correlations among risky asset returns are randomly changing over time. The insurer who faces the risk of paying stochastic insurance claims needs to manage her asset and liability by taking into account of the correlation risk. This paper investigates the impact of correlation risk to the optimal asset–liability management (ALM) of an insurer. We employ the Wishart process to model the stochastic covariance matrix of risky asset returns. The insurer aims to minimize the variance of the terminal wealth given an expected terminal wealth subject to the risk of paying out random liabilities of compound Poisson process. This ALM problem then becomes a linear–quadratic stochastic optimal control problem with stochastic volatilities, stochastic correlations and jumps. The recognition of an affine form in the solution process enables us to derive the explicit closed-form solution to the optimal ALM portfolio policy, obtain the efficient frontier, and identify the condition that the solution is well behaved.     

On smoothing of the Crank–Nicolson scheme and higher order schemes for pricing barrier options

Most option pricing problems have nonsmooth payoffs or discontinuous derivatives at the exercise price. Discrete barrier options have not only nonsmooth payoffs but also time dependent discontinuities. In pricing barrier options, certain aspects are triggered if the asset price becomes too high or too low. Standard smoothing schemes used to solve problems with nonsmooth payoff do not work well for discrete barrier options because of discontinuities introduced in the time domain when each barrier is applied. Moreover, these unwanted oscillations become worse when estimating the hedging parameters, e.g., Delta and Gamma. We have an improved smoothing strategy for the Crank–Nicolson method which is unique in achieving optimal order convergence for barrier option problems. Numerical experiments are discussed for one asset and two asset problems. Time evolution graphs are obtained for one asset problems to show how option prices change with respect to time. This smoothing strategy is then extended to higher order methods using diagonal (m,m)$(m,m)$—Padé main schemes under a smoothing strategy of using as damping schemes the (0,2m-1)$(0,2m-1)$ subdiagonal Padé schemes.     

The opportunity cost of mean–variance choice under estimation risk

Mean–variance portfolio choice is often criticized as sub-optimal in the more general expected utility framework. It is argued that the expected utility framework takes into consideration higher moments ignored by mean variance analysis. A body of research suggests that mean–variance choice, though arguably sub-optimal, provides very close-to-expected utility maximizing portfolios and their expected utilities, basing its evaluation on in-sample analysis where mean–variance choice is sub-optimal by definition. In order to clarify this existing research, this study provides a framework that allows comparing in-sample and out-of-sample performance of the mean variance portfolios against expected utility maximizing portfolios. Our in-sample results confirm the results of earlier studies. On the other hand, our out-of-sample results show that the expected utility model performs worse. The out-of-sample inferiority of the expected utility model is more pronounced for preferences and constraints under which in-sample mean variance approximations are weakest. We argue that, in addition to its elegance and simplicity, the mean–variance model extracts more information from sample data because it uses the covariance matrix of returns. The expected utility model may reach its optimal solution without using information from the covariance matrix.     

Portfolio selection under possibilistic mean–variance utility and a SMO algorithm

In this paper, we propose a new portfolio selection model with the maximum utility based on the interval-valued possibilistic mean and possibilistic variance, which is a two-parameter quadratic programming problem. We also present a sequential minimal optimization (SMO) algorithm to obtain the optimal portfolio. The remarkable feature of the algorithm is that it is extremely easy to implement, and it can be extended to any size of portfolio selection problems for finding an exact optimal solution.     

Analytical pricing of vulnerable options under a generalized jump–diffusion model

In this paper we propose a model to price European vulnerable options. We formulate their credit risk in a reduced form model and the dynamics of the spot price in a completely random generalized jump–diffusion model, which nests a number of important models in finance. We obtain a closed-form price for the vulnerable option by (1) determining an equivalent martingale measure, using the Esscher transform and (2) manipulating the pay-off structure of the option four further times, by using the Esscher–Girsanov transform.     

Time-consistent reinsurance and investment strategies for mean–variance insurer under partial information

In this paper, based on equilibrium control law proposed by Björk and Murgoci (2010), we study an optimal investment and reinsurance problem under partial information for insurer with mean–variance utility, where insurer’s risk aversion varies over time. Instead of treating this time-inconsistent problem as pre-committed, we aim to find time-consistent equilibrium strategy within a game theoretic framework. In particular, proportional reinsurance, acquiring new business, investing in financial market are available in the market. The surplus process of insurer is depicted by classical Lundberg model, and the financial market consists of one risk free asset and one risky asset with unobservable Markov-modulated regime switching drift process. By using reduction technique and solving a generalized extended HJB equation, we derive closed-form time-consistent investment–reinsurance strategy and corresponding value function. Moreover, we compare results under partial information with optimal investment–reinsurance strategy when Markov chain is observable. Finally, some numerical illustrations and sensitivity analysis are provided.     

Mean–variance–skewness efficient surfaces,Stein’s lemma and the multivariate extended skew-Student distribution

Recent advances in Stein’s lemma imply that under elliptically symmetric distributions all rational investors will select a portfolio which lies on Markowitz’ mean–variance efficient frontier. This paper describes extensions to Stein’s lemma for the case when a random vector has the multivariate extended skew-Student distribution. Under this distribution, rational investors will select a portfolio which lies on a single mean–variance–skewness efficient hyper-surface. The same hyper-surface arises under a broad class of models in which returns are defined by the convolution of a multivariate elliptically symmetric distribution and a multivariate distribution of non-negative random variables. Efficient portfolios on the efficient surface may be computed using quadratic programming.