A lower bound for the interval number of a graph

The interval number i(G) of a graph G with n vertices is the lowest integer m such that G is the intersection graph of some family of sets I₁,…,I_n with every I_i being the union of at most m real intervals. In this article a lower bound for i(G) is proved followed by some considerations about the construction of graphs that are critical with respect to the interval number.     

Optimal labelling of a product of two paths

If G is a graph with p vertices and at least one edge, we set φ (G) = m n max |f(u) ? f(v)|, where the maximum is taken over all edges uv and the minimum over all one-to-one mappings f : V(G) → {1, 2, …, p}: V(G) denotes the set of vertices of G.P_n will denote a path of length n whose vertices are integers 1, 2, …, n with i adjacent to j if and only if |i ? j| = 1. P_m × P_n will denote a graph whose vertices are elements of {1, 2, …, m} × {1, 2, …, n} and in which (i, j), (r, s) are adjacent whenever either i = r and |j ? s| = 1 or j = s and |i ? r| = 1.Theorem.If max(m, n) ? 2, thenφ(P_m × P_n) = min(m, n).     

Nombres de ramsey dans le cas orienté

Given two directed graphs G₁, G₂, the Ramsey number R(G₁,G₂) is the smallest integer n such that for any partition {U₁,U₂} of the arcs of the complete symmetric directed graph K¹_n, there exists an integer i such that the partial graph generated by U_i contains G_i as a subgraph. In this article, we determine R(P?_m,D?_n) and R(D?_m,D?_n) for some values of m and n, where P?_m denotes the directed path having m vertices and D?_m is obtained from P?_m by adding an arc from the initial vertex of P?_m to the terminal vertex.     

Clique graphs of time graphs

A simple, finite graph G is called a time graph (equivalently, an indifference graph) if there is an injective real function f on the vertices v(G) such that v_iv_j ∈ e(G) for v_i ≠ v_j if and only if |f(v_i) ? f(v_j)| ≤ 1. A clique of a graph G is a maximal complete subgraph of G. The clique graph K(G) of a graph G is the intersection graph of the cliques of G. It will be shown that the clique graph of a time graph is a time graph, and that every time graph is the clique graph of some time graph. Denote the clique graph of a clique graph of G by K²(G), and inductively, denote K(K^m?1(G)) by K^m(G). Define the index indx(G) of a connected time graph G as the smallest integer n such that Kⁿ(G) is the trivial graph. It will be shown that the index of a time graph is equal to its diameter. Finally, bounds on the diameter of a time graph will be derived.     

On n-Hamiltonian line graphs

With each nonempty graph G one can associate a graph L(G), called the line graph of G, with the property that there exists a one-to-one correspondence between E(G) and V(L(G)) such that two vertices of L(G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding edges of G are adjacent. For integers m ≥ 2, the mth iterated line graph L^m(G) of G is defined to be L(L^m-1(G)). A graph G of order p ≥ 3 is n-Hamiltonian, 0 ≤ n ≤ p ? 3, if the removal of any k vertices, 0 ≤ k ≤ n, results in a Hamiltonian graph. It is shown that if G is a connected graph with δ(G) ≥ 3, where δ(G) denotes the minimum degree of G, then L²(G) is (δ(G) ? 3)-Hamiltonian. Furthermore, if G is 2-connected and δ(G) ≥ 4, then L²(G) is (2δ(G) ? 4)-Hamiltonian. For a connected graph G which is neither a path, a cycle, nor the graph K(1, 3) and for any positive integer n, the existence of an integer k such that L^m(G) is n-Hamiltonian for every m ≥ k is exhibited. Then, for the special case n = 1, bounds on (and, in some cases, the exact value of) the smallest such integer k are determined for various classes of graphs.     

Graham’s pebbling conjecture on product of thorn graphs of complete graphs

The pebbling number of a graph G, f(G), is the least n such that, no matter how n pebbles are placed on the vertices of G, we can move a pebble to any vertex by a sequence of pebbling moves, each move taking two pebbles off one vertex and placing one on an adjacent vertex. Let p₁,p₂,…,p_n be positive integers and G be such a graph, V(G)=n. The thorn graph of the graph G, with parameters p₁,p₂,…,p_n, is obtained by attaching p_i new vertices of degree 1 to the vertex u_i of the graph G, i=1,2,…,n. Graham conjectured that for any connected graphs G and H, f(G×H)≤f(G)f(H). We show that Graham’s conjecture holds true for a thorn graph of the complete graph with every by a graph with the two-pebbling property. As a corollary, Graham’s conjecture holds when G and H are the thorn graphs of the complete graphs with every .     

Path-Star Ramsey numbers

Let f(m,n) be the least integer N such that for every graph G with N vertices, either G contains a path of m vertices or the complement of G contains a vertex of degree at least n. This paper determines f(m,n) for all m, n.     

On the packing chromatic number of some lattices

For a positive integer k, a k-packing in a graph G is a subset A of vertices such that the distance between any two distinct vertices from A is more than k. The packing chromatic number of G is the smallest integer m such that the vertex set of G can be partitioned as V₁,V₂,…,V_m where V_i is an i-packing for each i. It is proved that the planar triangular lattice T and the three-dimensional integer lattice Z³ do not have finite packing chromatic numbers.     

Bandwidth of the corona of two graphs

The bandwidth B(G) of a graph G is the minimum of the quantity max{|f(u)-f(v)|:uv∈E(G)} taken over all injective integer numberings f of G. The corona of two graphs G and H, written as G°H, is the graph obtained by taking one copy of G and |V(G)| copies of H, and then joining the ith vertex of G to every vertex in the ith copy of H. In this paper, we investigate the bandwidth of the corona of two graphs. For a graph G, we denote the connectivity of G by κ(G). Let G be a graph on n vertices with B(G)=κ(G)=k?2 and let H be a graph of order m. Let c,p and q be three integers satisfying 1?c?k-1 and . We define h_i=(2k-1)m+(k-i)(⌊(2k-1)m/i⌋+1)+1 for i=1,2,…,k and b=max{⌈(n(m+1)-qm-1)/(p+2)⌉,⌈(n(m+1)+k-q-1)/(p+3)⌉}. Then, among other results, we prove that

     

Generalized n-tuple colorings of a graph: A counterexample to a conjecture of Brigham and Dutton

In their papers (Technical Report CS-TR 50, University of Central Florida, 1980; J. Combin. Theory Ser. B32 (1982), 90–94) Brigham and Dutton introduce the notion of (n : i)-chromatic numbers of a graph, a generalization of Stahl's nth chromatic numbers (J. Combin. Theory Ser. B20, (1976), 185–203). The (n : i)-chromatic number of a graph G, denoted by χ_nⁱ(G), is the smallest integer m such that each vertex of G can be colored with a set of n colors in {1, 2,…, m} in such a way that any two adjacent vertices have exactly i colors in common. Brigham and Dutton conjecture at the end of loc cit that for all integers n and i with 0 ≤ i ≤ n ? 1, and for every graph G, χ_nⁱ⁺¹(G) ≤ χ_nⁱ(G). We prove this conjecture in some special cases and disprove it in the general case.     

A characterization of robert's inequality for boxicity

F.S. Roberts defined the boxicity of a graph G as the smallest positive integer n for which there exists a function F assigning to each vertex x?G a sequence F(x)(1),F(x)(2),…, F(x)(n) of closed intervals of R so that distinct vertices x and y are adjacent in G if and only if F(x)(i)∩F(y)(i)≠? fori = 1, 2, 3, …, n. Roberts then proved that if G is a graph having 2n + 1 vertices, thentheboxicityofGisatmostn. In this paper, we provide an explicit characterization of this inequality by determining for each n ? 1 the minimum collection $\text{C}$_n of graphs so that a graph G having 2n + 1 vertices has boxicity n if and only if it contains a graph from $\text{C}$_n as an induced subgraph. We also discuss combinatorial connections with analogous characterization problems for rectangle graphs, circular arc graphs, and partially ordered sets.     

A class of antimagic join graphs

A labeling f of a graph G is a bijection from its edge set E(G) to the set {1, 2, . . . , |E(G)|}, which is antimagic if for any distinct vertices x and y, the sum of the labels on edges incident to x is different from the sum of the labels on edges incident to y. A graph G is antimagic if G has an f which is antimagic. Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured in 1990 that every connected graph other than K 2 is antimagic. In this paper, we show that if G 1 is an n-vertex graph with minimum degree at least r, and G 2 is an m-vertex graph with maximum degree at most 2r-1 (m ≥ n), then G1 ∨ G2 is antimagic.     

Proof of a conjecture on game domination

Let G(V, E) be a simple, undirected graph where V is the set of vertices and E is the set of edges. A b‐dimensional cube is a Cartesian product I₁×I₂×···×I_b, where each I_i is a closed interval of unit length on the real line. The cubicity of G, denoted by cub(G), is the minimum positive integer b such that the vertices in G can be mapped to axis parallel b‐dimensional cubes in such a way that two vertices are adjacent in G if and only if their assigned cubes intersect. An interval graph is a graph that can be represented as the intersection of intervals on the real line—i.e. the vertices of an interval graph can be mapped to intervals on the real line such that two vertices are adjacent if and only if their corresponding intervals overlap. Suppose S(m) denotes a star graph on m+1 nodes. We define claw number ψ(G) of the graph to be the largest positive integer m such that S(m) is an induced subgraph of G. It can be easily shown that the cubicity of any graph is at least ?log₂ψ(G)?. In this article, we show that for an interval graph G ?log₂ψ(G)??cub(G)??log₂ψ(G)?+2. It is not clear whether the upper bound of ?log₂ψ(G)?+2 is tight: till now we are unable to find any interval graph with cub(G)>?log₂ψ(G)?. We also show that for an interval graph G, cub(G)??log₂α?, where α is the independence number of G. Therefore, in the special case of ψ(G)=α, cub(G) is exactly ?log₂α₂?. The concept of cubicity can be generalized by considering boxes instead of cubes. A b‐dimensional box is a Cartesian product I₁×I₂×···×I_b, where each I_i is a closed interval on the real line. The boxicity of a graph, denoted box(G), is the minimum k such that G is the intersection graph of k‐dimensional boxes. It is clear that box(G)?cub(G). From the above result, it follows that for any graph G, cub(G)?box(G)?log₂α?. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 65: 323–333, 2010     

Competitively Tight Graphs

The competition graph of a digraph D is a (simple undirected) graph which has the same vertex set as D and has an edge between two distinct vertices x and y if and only if there exists a vertex v in D such that (x, v) and (y, v) are arcs of D. For any graph G, G together with sufficiently many isolated vertices is the competition graph of some acyclic digraph. The competition number k(G) of a graph G is the smallest number of such isolated vertices. Computing the competition number of a graph is an NP-hard problem in general and has been one of the important research problems in the study of competition graphs. Opsut [1982] showed that the competition number of a graph G is related to the edge clique cover number θ _E (G) of the graph G via θ _E (G) ? |V(G)| + 2 ≤ k(G) ≤ θ _E (G). We first show that for any positive integer m satisfying 2 ≤ m ≤ |V(G)|, there exists a graph G with k(G) = θ _E (G) ? |V(G)| + m and characterize a graph G satisfying k(G) = θ _E (G). We then focus on what we call competitively tight graphs G which satisfy the lower bound, i.e., k(G) = θ _E (G) ? |V(G)| + 2. We completely characterize the competitively tight graphs having at most two triangles. In addition, we provide a new upper bound for the competition number of a graph from which we derive a sufficient condition and a necessary condition for a graph to be competitively tight.     

(m)-covering of a triangulation

Let G be a graph triangularly imbedded into a surface S, G_(m) is the graph constructed from G by replacing each vertex x by m vertices (xx,0), (x, 1), ..., (x, m − 1) and joining two vertices (x, i) and (y, j) by an edge if and only if x and y are joined in G. The main result is that the construction of G_(m) is possible whenever n is an odd prime and a well separating cycle (mod m) can be determined.     

Vertex-disjoint quadrilaterals containing specified edges in a bipartite graph

The theory of vertex-disjoint cycles and 2-factors of graphs is the extension and generation of the well-known Hamiltonian cycles theory and it has important applications in network communication. In this paper we first prove the following result. Let G=(V ₁,V ₂;E) be a bipartite graph with |V ₁|=|V ₂|=n such that n≥2k+1, where k≥1 is an integer. If d(x)+d(y)≥?(4n+2k?1)/3? for each pair of nonadjacent vertices x and y of G with x∈V ₁ and y∈V ₂, then, for any k independent edges e ₁,…,e _k of G, G contains k vertex-disjoint quadrilaterals C ₁,…,C _k such that e _i ∈E(C _i ) for each i∈{1,…,k}. We further show that the degree condition above is sharp. If |V ₁|=|V ₂|=2k, we give degree conditions that G has a 2-factor with k vertex-disjoint quadrilaterals C ₁,…,C _k containing specified edges of G.     

The Conditional Covering Problem on Unweighted Interval Graphs with Nonuniform Coverage Radius

Let G = (V, E) be an interval graph with n vertices and m edges. A positive integer R(x) is associated with every vertex x ? V{x\in V}. In the conditional covering problem, a vertex x ? V{x \in V} covers a vertex y ? V{y \in V} (x ≠ y) if d(x, y) ≤ R(x) where d(x, y) is the shortest distance between the vertices x and y. The conditional covering problem (CCP) finds a minimum cardinality vertex set C í V{C\subseteq V} so as to cover all the vertices of the graph and every vertex in C is also covered by another vertex of C. This problem is NP-complete for general graphs. In this paper, we propose an efficient algorithm to solve the CCP with nonuniform coverage radius in O(n ²) time, when G is an interval graph containing n vertices.     

Some Algebraic Methods for Calculating the Number of Colorings of a Graph

With an arbitrary graph G having n vertices and m edges, and with an arbitrary natural number p, we associate in a natural way a polynomial R(x ₁,...,x _n) with integer coefficients such that the number of colorings of the vertices of the graph G in p colors is equal to p ^m-n R(0,...,0). Also with an arbitrary maximal planar graph G, we associate several polynomials with integer coefficients such that the number of colorings of the edges of the graph G in 3 colors can be calculated in several ways via the coefficients of each of these polynomials. Bibliography: 2 titles.     

The interval number of a complete multipartite graph

The interval number of a graph G, denoted i(G), is the least positive integer t for which G is the intersection graph of a family of sets each of which is the union of at most t closed intervals of the real line $\text{R}$. Trotter and Harary showed that the interval number of the complete bipartite graph K(m,n) is $\text{?}\text{(mn + 1)}\text{(m + n)}\text{?}$. Matthews showed that the interval number of the complete multipartite graph K(n₁,n₂,…,n_p) was the same as the interval number of K(n₁,n₂) when n₁ = n₂ = ? = n_p. Trotter and Hopkins showed that i(K(n₁,n₂,…,n_p)) ≤ 1 + i(K(n₁,n₂)) whenever p ≥ 2 and n₁≥n₂≥ ? ≥n_p. West showed that for each n ≥ 3, there exists a constant c_n so that if p ≥ c_n,n₁ = n²?n ?1, and n₂ = n₃ = ? n_p = n, then i(K(n₁,n₂,…,n_p) = 1 + i(K(n₁, n₂)). In view of these results, it is natural to consider the problem of determining those pairs (n₁,n₂) with n₁ ≥ n₂ so that i(K(n₂,…,n_p)) = i(K(n₁,n₂)) whenever p ≥ 2 and n₂ ≥ n₃ ≥ ? ≥ n_p. In this paper, we present constructions utilizing Eulerian circuits in directed graphs to show that the only exceptional pairs are (n² ? n ? 1, n) for n ≥ 3 and (7,5).