Oscillatory properties of strongly superlinear differential equations with deviating arguments

We regard a graph G as a set {1,…, v} together with a nonempty set E of two-element subsets of {1,…, v}. Let p = (p₁,…, p_v) be an element of $\text{R}$^nv representing v points in $\text{R}$ⁿ and consider the realization G(p) of G in $\text{R}$ⁿ consisting of the line segments [p_i, p_j] in $\text{R}$ⁿ for {i, j} ?E. The figure G(p) is said to be rigid in $\text{R}$ⁿ if every continuous path in $\text{R}$^nv, beginning at p and preserving the edge lengths of G(p), terminates at a point q ? $\text{R}$^nv which is the image (Tp₁,…, Tp_v) of p under an isometry T of $\text{R}$ⁿ. We here study the rigidity and infinitesimal rigidity of graphs, surfaces, and more general structures. A graph theoretic method for determining the rigidity of graphs in $\text{R}$² is discussed, followed by an examination of the rigidity of convex polyhedral surfaces in $\text{R}$³.     

A characterization of planar cubic graphs

If S is a collection of circuits in a graph G, the circuits in S are said to be consistently orientable if G can be oriented so that they are all directed circuits. If S is a set of three or more consistently orientable circuits such that no edge of G belongs to more than two circuits of S, then S is called a ring if there exists a cyclic ordering C₀, C₁,…, C_{n ? 1}, C₀ of the n circuits in S such that $\text{EC}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? EC}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{≠ ?}$ if and only if j = i or j ≡ i ? 1 (mod n) or j ≡ i + 1 (mod n). We characterise planar cubic graphs in terms of the non-existence of a ring with certain specified properties.     

Monotonicity of permanents of certain doubly stochastic circulant matrices

Let p_k(A), k=2,…,n, denote the sum of the permanents of all k×k submatrices of the n×n matrix A. A conjecture of Ðokovi?, which is stronger than the famed van der Waerden permanent conjecture, asserts that the functions p_k((1?θ)J_n+;θA), k=2,…, n, are strictly increasing in the interval 0?θ?1 for every doubly stochastic matrix A. Here J_n is the n×n matrix all whose entries are equal $\text{1}\text{n}$. In the present paper it is proved that the conjecture holds true for the circulant matrices A=αI_n+ βP_n, α, β?0, α+;β=1, and $\text{A=}\text{(nJ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?I}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?P}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{(n?2)}$, where I_n and P_n are respectively the n×n identify matrix and the n×n permutation matrix with 1's in positions (1,2), (2,3),…, (n?1, n), (n, 1).     

A conjecture of recski in combinatorial set theory

A p-cover of $\text{n = {1, 2,…,}\text{n}\text{}}$ is a family of subsets $\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{≠ ?}$ such that ∪ S_i = n and |S_i ∩ S_i| ? p for i ≠ j. We prove that for fixed p, the number of p-cover of n is O(n^p+1logn).     

Diagonal norm hermitian matrices

If v is a norm on $\text{C}$ⁿ, let H(v) denote the set of all norm-Hermitians in $\text{C}$ⁿⁿ. Let S be a subset of the set of real diagonal matrices D. Then there exists a norm v such that S=H(v) (or S = H(v)∩D) if and only if S contains the identity and S is a subspace of D with a basis consisting of rational vectors. As a corollary, it is shown that, for a diagonable matrix h with distinct eigenvalues λ₁,…, λ_r, r?n, there is a norm v such that h ∈ H(v), but h^s?H(v), for some integer s, if and only if λ₂–λ₁,…, λ_r–λ₁ are linearly dependent over the rationals. It is also shown that the set of all norms v, for which H(v) consists of all real multiples of the identity, is an open, dense subset, in a natural metric, of the set of all norms.     

Symposium on combinatorial mathematics and optimal design

Let A₁,A₂,…,A_n be finite sets such that A_i?A_j for all i≠j. Let F be an intersecting family consisting of sets contained in some A_i, i=1,2,…,n. Chvátal conjectured that among the largest intersecting families, there is always a star. In this paper, we obtain another proof of a result of Schönheim: If A₁∩A₂∩?∩A_n≠?, then the conjecture is true. We also prove that if A_i∩A_jA_k = ? for all i≠j≠k≠i or if the independent system satisfies a hereditary tree structure, then the conjecture is also true.     

A symmetry relationship for a class of partitions

Let S(n, k, v) denote the number of vectors (a₀,…, a_n?1) with nonnegative integer components that satisfy a₀ + … + a_{n ? 1} = k and Σ_i=0^n?1ia_i ≡ v (mod n). Two proofs are given for the relation S(n, k, v) = S(k, n, v). The first proof is by algebraic enumeration while the second is by combinatorial construction.     

Minimum norm problems over transportation polytopes

We consider the problem of updating input-output matrices, i.e., for given (m,n) matrices A ? 0, W ? 0 and vectors u ? $\text{R}$^m, v?$\text{R}$ⁿ, find an (m,n) matrix X ? 0 with prescribed row sums Σⁿ_j=1X_ij = u_i (i = 1,…,m) and prescribed column sums Σ^m_i=1X_ij = v_j (j = 1,…,n) which fits the relations X_ij = A_ij + λ_iW_ij + W_ij + W_ijμ_j for all i,j and some λ?$\text{R}$^m, μ?$\text{R}$ⁿ. Here we consider the question of existence of a solution to this problem, i.e., we shall characterize those matrices A, W and vectors u,v which lead to a solvable problem. Furthermore we outline some computational results using an algorithm of [2].     

On maximizing det (ATA)

Let A be an n × p matrix of ± 1's, n ? p. The problem considered is the destination of the maximal value of det(A^TA). The complete solution is given for p ? 4, and for $\text{p = 5, n}\text{x}\text{?}\text{2}$ (mod 4) if the Hadamard conjecture is true. For p > 5, the maximum value is determined for n sufficiently large compared to p and provided certain Hadamard matrices exist.     

Sperner systems consisting of pairs of complementary subsets

It was proved by Erdös, Ko, and Radó (Intersection theorems for systems of finite sets, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.12 (1961), 313–320.) that if $\text{A}$ = {;A₁,…, A_l}; consists of k-subsets of a set with n > 2k elements such that A_i ∩ A_j ≠ ? for all i, j then l ? (_k?1^n?1). Schönheim proved that if A₁, …, A_l are subsets of a set S with n elements such that A_i ? A_j, A_i ∩ A_j ≠ ø and A_i ∪ A_j ≠ S for all i ≠ j then $\text{l ? (}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>[</mtext><mtext>n</mtext><mtext>2</mtext><mtext>]\; ?\; 1</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{)}$. In this note we prove a common strengthening of these results.     

Unitary interpolants,factorization indices and infinite Hankel block matrices

The existence, uniqueness, and construction of unitary n × n matrix valued functions $\text{?(ζ) = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; ?\infty }}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{ζ}{}^{\mathrm{j}}$ in Wiener-like algebras on the circle with prescribed matrix Fourier coefficients $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= γ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$ for j ? 0 are studied. In particular, if $\text{Σ ¦γ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{¦ < ∞}$, then such an ? exists with $\text{Σ ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{¦ < ∞}$ if and only if ∥Γ₀∥ ? 1, where Γ_v, denotes the infinite block Hankel matrix (γ_{j + k + v}), j, k = 0, 1,…, acting in the sequence space l_n². One of the main results is that the nonnegative factorization indices of every such ? are uniquely determined by the given data in terms of the dimensions of the kernels of $\text{I ? Γ}{}_{\mathrm{v}}{}^1\text{Γ}{}_{\mathrm{v}}$, whereas the negative factorization indices are arbitrary. It is also shown that there is a unique such ? if and only if the data forces all the factorization indices to be nonnegative and simple conditions for that and a formula for ? in terms of certain Schmidt pairs of Γ₀ are given. The results depend upon a fine analysis of the structure of the kernels of $\text{I ? Γ}{}_{\mathrm{v}}{}^1\text{Γ}{}_{\mathrm{v}}$ and of the one step extension problem of Adamjan, Arov, and Krein (Funct. Anal. Appl.2 (1968), 1–18). Isometric interpolants for the nonsquare case are also considered.     

Prime interchange graphs of classes of matrices of zeros and ones

Let R = (r₁,…, r_m) and S = (s₁,…, s_n) be nonnegative integral vectors, and let $\text{U}$(R, S) denote the class of all m × n matrices of 0's and 1's having row sum vector R and column sum vector S. An invariant position of $\text{U}$(R, S) is a position whose entry is the same for all matrices in $\text{U}$(R, S). The interchange graph G(R, S) is the graph where the vertices are the matrices in $\text{U}$(R, S) and where two matrices are joined by an edge provided they differ by an interchange. We prove that when 1 ≤ r_i ≤ n ? 1 (i = 1,…, m) and 1 ≤ s_j ≤ m ? 1 (j = 1,…, n), G(R, S) is prime if and only if $\text{U}$(R, S) has no invariant positions.     

Subsets of a finite set that intersect each other in at most one element

In this paper we study de Bruijn-Erdös type theorems that deal with the foundations of finite geometries. The following theorem is one of our main conclusions. Let S₁,…, S_n be n subsets of an n-set S. Suppose that |S_i| ? 3 (i = 1,…,n) and that |S_i ∩ S_j| ? 1 (i ≠ j;i,j = 1,…,n). Suppose further that each S_i has nonempty intersection with at least n ? 2 of the other subsets. Then the subsets S₁,…,S_n of S are one of the following configurations. (1) They are a finite projective plane. (2) They are a symmetric group divisible design and each subset has nonempty intersection with exactly n ? 2 of the other subsets. (3) We have n = 9 or n = 10 and in each case there exists a unique configuration that does not satisfy (1) or (2).     

Symmetric multi-box splines for higher degree

We consider the space S _n =S _n (v ₀,…,v _n+r ) of compactly supported C ^n?1 piecewise polynomials on a mesh M of lines through ?² in directions v ₀,…,v _n+r . A sequence ψ=(ψ ₁,…,ψ _r ) of elements of S _n is called a multi-box spline if every element of S _n is a finite linear combination of shifts of (the components of) ψ. For the case n=2, 3 we give some examples for multi-box splines and show that they are not always stable. It is further shown that any C ^n?1 piecewise polynomial of degree n≥2 on M, is possibly a symmetric multi-box spline.     

On the zeros of exponential polynomials

Suppose r = (r₁, …, r_M), r_j ? 0, γ_kj ? 0 integers, k = 1, 2, …, N, j = 1, 2, …, M, γ_k · r = ∑_jγ_kjr_j. The purpose of this paper is to study the behavior of the zeros of the function h(λ, a, r) = 1 + ∑_{j = 1}^Na_je^{?λγ_j · r}, where each a_j is a nonzero real number. More specifically, if $\text{Z}\text{?}\text{(a, r) =}\text{closure}\text{{}\text{Re}\text{λ: h(λ, a, r) = 0}}$, we study the dependence of $\text{Z}\text{?}\text{(a, r)}\text{on}\text{a, r}$. This set is continuous in a but generally not in r. However, it is continuous in r if the components of r are rationally independent. Specific criterion to determine when $\text{0 ?}\text{Z}\text{?}\text{(a, r)}$ are given. Several examples illustrate the complicated nature of $\text{Z}\text{?}\text{(a, r)}$. The results have immediate implication to the theory of stability for difference equations x(t) ? ∑_{k = 1}^MA_kx(t ? r_k) = 0, where x is an n-vector, since the characteristic equation has the form given by h(λ, a, r). The results give information about the preservation of stability with respect to variations in the delays. The results also are fundamental for a discussion of the dependence of solutions of neutral differential difference equations on the delays. These implications will appear elsewhere.     

On maximal antichains containing no set and its complement

Let 1?k₁?k₂?…?k_n be integers and let S denote the set of all vectors x = (x₁, …, x_n with integral coordinates satisfying 0?x_i?k_i, i = 1,2, …, n; equivalently, S is the set of all subsets of a multiset consisting of k_i elements of type i, i = 1,2, …, n. A subset X of S is an antichain if and only if for any two vectors x and y in X the inequalities x_i?y_i, i = 1,2, …, n, do not all hold. For an arbitrary subset H of S, (i)H denotes the subset of H consisting of vectors with component sum i, i = 0, 1, 2, …, K, where K = k₁ + k₂ + …k_n. |H| denotes the number of vectors in H, and the complement of a vector x?S is (k₁-x₁, k₂-x₂, …, k_n -x_n). What is the maximal cardinality of an antichain containing no vector and its complement? The answer is obtained as a corollary of the following theorem: if X is an antichain, K is even and$\text{|(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K)X|}$ does not exceed the number of vectors in $\text{(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K)S}$ with first coordinate different from k₁, then

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{K}\text{i≠}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K}\text{|(i)X|}\text{|(i)S|}\text{+}\text{|(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K)X|}\text{|(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K-1)S|}\text{?1}$

.     

Lower bounds for the distributions of certain multivariate test statistics

A lower (upper) bound is given for the distribution of each d_j, j = k + 1, …, p (j = 1, …, s), the jth latent root of AB^?1, where A and B are independent noncentral and central Wishart matrices having $\text{W}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(q, Σ; Ω)}$ with rank $\text{(Ω) ≤ k = p ? s}$ and W_p(n, Σ), respectively. Similar bound are also given for the distributions of noncentral means and canonical correlations. The results are applied to obtain lower bounds for the null distributions of some multivariate test statistics in Tintner's model, MANOVA and canonical analysis.     

A bound for the number of tournaments with specified scores

Let $\text{T}$(R) denote the set of all tournaments with score vector R = (r₁, r₂,…, r_n). R. A. Brualdi and Li Qiao (“Proceedings of the Silver Jubilee Conference in Combinatorics at Waterloo,” in press) conjectured that if R is strong with r₁ ≤ r₂ ≤ … ≤ r_n, then |$\text{T}$(R)| ≥ 2^n?2 with equality if and only if R = (1, 1, 2,…, n ? 3, n ? 2, n ? 2). In this paper their conjecture is proved, and this result is used to establish a lower bound on the cardinality of $\text{T}$(R) for every R.     

The Dirichlet problem for the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group,I

For (x,y,t)∈$\text{R}$ⁿ × $\text{R}$ⁿ × $\text{R}$, denote $\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{=}\text{?}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ 2y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{, y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{=}\text{?}\text{?y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? 2x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}$ and $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{=?}\text{1}\text{4}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{n}\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^2\text{+ Y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^2\text{+}\text{?}\text{?t}$. When α = n ? 2q, $\text{L}$_a represents the action of the Kohn Laplacian □_b on q-forms on the Heisenberg group. For ?n < α < n, we construct a parametrix for the Dirichlet problem in smooth domains D near non-characteristic points of ?D. A point w of ?D is non-characteristic if one of X₁,…, X_n, Y₁,…, Y_n is transverse to ?D at w. This yields sharp local estimates in the Dirichlet problem in the appropriate non-isotropic Lipschitz classes. The main new tool is a “convolution calculus” of pseudo-differential operators that can be applied to the relevant layer potentials, for which the usual asymptotic composition formula is false. Characteristic points are treated in Part II.