硫代硫酸铵预硫化的Mo/Al2O3催化剂加氢脱硫反应性能研究

研究了新型固体硫化剂硫代硫酸铵对加氢脱硫催化剂的预硫化。采用浸渍法将硫代硫酸铵负载在Mo/Al₂O₃模型催化剂上制备出预硫化的催化剂。通过X射线衍射、还原气氛的热重质谱联用和光电子能谱等表征手段研究了预硫化催化剂的物相、活化以及反应后催化剂的表面成分。结果表明,硫代硫酸铵中不同价态的硫在催化剂活化过程中起到不同作用,S^2-硫化活性金属,S⁶⁺修饰载体,减少载体与活性金属的相互作用,促进硫化。不同S/Mo摩尔比的预硫化催化剂经原位氢气活化用于噻吩加氢脱硫反应,S/Mo摩尔比为3的预硫化催化剂显示出最好的加氢脱硫活性,预硫化催化剂比Mo/Al₂O₃催化剂的脱硫活性提高17%。     

硫代硫酸铵预硫化的MoO3／Al2O3催化剂的活化和加氢脱硫活性

以硫代硫酸铵为硫化剂对MoO3/Al2O3催化剂进行预硫化,考察了制备方法和活化条件对预硫化催化剂噻吩加氢脱硫活性的影响. 结果表明,硫代硫酸铵预硫化的催化剂活化后,加氢脱硫活性好,噻吩的转化率达到99%以上,而二甲基二硫硫化的MoO3/Al2O3催化剂在相同条件下,噻吩转化率只有92%. 合适的活化温度为200～300 ℃, 活化压力增加有利于预硫化催化剂的还原硫化和加氢脱硫活性的提高. 硫代硫酸铵预硫化催化剂的高脱硫活性主要归因于多层的Ⅱ型MoS2活性相的形成,其次是硫化程度的提高. 硫代硫酸铵预硫化催化剂经过氢气活化和补充硫化两个阶段,其硫化程度高于传统方法硫化的催化剂.     

氮气热处理对硫代硫酸铵预硫化的Mo／Al2O3催化剂的影响

考察了氮气预处理温度对硫代硫酸铵预硫化的Mo/Al2O3催化剂噻吩加氢脱硫(HDS)活性的影响. 采用X射线衍射、高分辨电镜、光电子能谱、热重质谱和硫分析等方法对催化剂进行了表征. 结果表明,预硫化催化剂经80 ℃低温处理并于200 ℃氢气原位活化后噻吩转化率达到最高. 对于氮气低温预处理或常温干燥的预硫化催化剂,载体氧化铝被硫酸根修饰,减少了Mo与载体的相互作用,使得催化剂活化后硫化程度高, MoS2活性相呈多层的Ⅱ型结构,因而HDS活性高. 高于200 ℃的氮气热处理造成硫代硫酸铵的分解,并有少量的多层MoS2活性相生成,但高温热处理造成硫的流失使得活性金属活化后硫化程度偏低,而且MoS2活性相呈现单层的Ⅰ型结构,因而HDS活性较低.     

FCC汽油选择性HDS催化剂的原位红外光谱研究

采用器外预硫化法制备了碳纳米管(CNT)负载的硫化态Co-Mo-S选择性加氢脱硫催化剂.应用原位红外技术(in-situ IR)对选择性加氢脱硫催化剂(Co-Mo-S/CNT)的表面吸附烯烃特性和HDS过程进行了动态研究.原位红外光谱数据表明:1-辛烯在Co-Mo-S/CNT催化剂表面很容易发生加氢饱和,150℃时完全反应;二异丁烯较难加氢,340℃下归属于=C-H伸缩振动吸收峰的3081cm-1特征峰依然很明显;噻吩的特征峰在280℃左右完全消失,Co-Mo-S/CNT催化剂对二异丁烯和噻吩具有很高的选择性HDS活性,噻吩和二异丁烯在Co-Mo-S/CNT催化剂上的吸附发生在不同的活性位上,不存在相互影响.     

器外预硫化型MoNiP/γ-Al2O3催化剂的二苯并噻吩加氢脱硫活性

 制备了两种器外预硫化型MoNiP/γ-Al2O3催化剂,并以二苯并噻吩为模型化合物考察了其加氢脱硫(HDS)活性,选择了传统的器内预硫化催化剂作为参比. 采用X射线衍射(XRD)、 高分辨透射电镜(HRTEM)和X射线光电子能谱(XPS)等手段对二者在加氢活性相方面的差别进行了研究. 结果表明,器外预硫化催化剂的HDS活性(最高达到99%)与器内预硫化催化剂相当,但是其加氢能力相对较弱. XRD与HRTEM等研究表明,器外预硫化催化剂所形成的MoS2片晶的堆垛层数相对较低,而Mo与S元素的XPS分析结果则说明相对器内预硫化催化剂,器外预硫化催化剂中不但Mo的硫化度较低,而且MoS2活性相的含量亦较少,而二者活性相之间的这种差异应是导致两类催化剂加氢活性不同的主要原因.     

加氢脱硫反应后催化剂βMo2N0.78的研究

在对βMo2N0.78催化剂加氢脱硫催化性能进行考察的基础上，对反应使用后催化剂的组成、结构变化、以及反应后催化剂再处理对活性的影响等几方面进行了研究。结果表明，在噻吩加氢脱硫条件下，βMo2N0.78 催化剂的氮含量下降，表层被硫化，而且钝化过程中产生的氮氧化物被消耗，但体相结构没有发生变化，表现了较强的抗硫化性能；脱硫反应前后催化剂的氢还原处理不能改善催化剂的活性，但预硫化催化剂在反应起始的活性与钝化催化剂在反应稳定时活性相近，加氢脱硫反应后催化剂的再次氮化处理，可以较大程度的恢复催化剂的初始活性。     

超声波-微波法制备NiW/Al2O3加氢脱硫催化剂

 采用一次浸渍技术制备了NiW/Al2O3加氢脱硫(HDS)催化剂,在制备过程中采用超声波处理浸渍液,采用微波进行样品干燥. 以噻吩为模型化合物,在微反装置上评价了该催化剂的加氢脱硫活性. 使用X射线光电子能谱和透射电镜等表征手段研究了催化剂的表面状态和物化性. 结果表明,使用超声波及微波技术制备的NiW/Al2O3催化剂具有较高的加氢脱硫活性,催化剂的活性组分较易硫化,可生成更多的硫化物种参与反应. 催化剂中硫化态钨的表面原子浓度较高,从而使硫化态钨物种保持较高的表面分散度,有利于增加活性中心的数目. 该催化剂的活性中心结构具有较多配位不饱和的边缘位和棱边位,因而具有较高的加氢脱硫活性.     

模型石脑油在硫化Co-Mo／SBA-15催化剂上的加氢异构化反应

通过浸渍法制备了Co/SBA-15、Mo/SBA-15和Co-Mo/SBA-15催化剂,对催化剂的孔结构、物相及表面酸性进行了表征,测定了硫化催化剂上噻吩加氢脱硫及1-己烯加氢异构的反应性能,并与工业Co-Mo/γ-Al2O3催化剂进行了对比.结果表明,Co-Mo/SBA-15催化剂表面具有较强的B酸中心,且对噻吩加氢脱硫具有较高的催化活性;而Co-Mo/γ-Al2O3催化剂表面主要为较强的L酸中心,对1-己烯加氢具有较高的催化活性.Mo/SBA-15催化剂的B酸酸性较强,但同时具有较高的1-己烯加氢活性,故它对1-己烯骨架异构的催化活性不高.Co-Mo/SBA-15催化剂的加氢活性相对较低,1-己烯容易在其较强的B酸中心上发生骨架异构反应,具有潜在的工业化应用前景.     

噻吩加氢脱硫和四氢萘催化加氢反应中的载体和助剂的影响

 为了更好地认识加氢脱硫和催化加氢反应中的载体影响和助剂效应，在同样的催化剂制备方法及反应条件下，研究了噻吩加氢脱硫（HDS）和四氢萘催化加氢（HYD）反应．结果表明，对于无助剂的Mo和W催化剂，载体对催化活性的影响顺序为TiO2－Al2O3＞ZrO2＞Al2O3．助剂的添加改变了催化剂活性顺序．Ni助剂催化剂的活性明显高于Co助剂催化剂．ZrO2担载的添加Ni的Mo和W催化剂分别获得了最佳的HDS和HYD活性．然而，添加Pt的Mo和W催化剂其HDS和HYD活性仅是Pt与Mo（W）二者的加和，Pt与Mo（W）之间没有协同效应．先将担载的Mo和W预硫化再将助剂引入体系的催化剂制备方法可以避免Ni和Co过早硫化形成类硫化镍（或硫化钴）物相，与采用螯合物分子方法制备的催化剂间有一定的相似性．     

表面活性剂对水热法合成MoS2加氢脱硫催化剂的影响

采用水热法合成了MoS₂加氢脱硫催化剂,用物理吸附、XRD、SEM、TEM等手段对催化剂进行表征,并以噻吩为模型化合物研究不同类型表面活性剂对合成MoS₂催化剂活性的影响。结果表明,加入表面活性剂制备的催化剂颗粒疏松均匀,比表面积、孔容、孔径都较大,并且MoS₂层状堆叠数目增加;所制催化剂在噻吩加氢脱硫反应中均显示出较好的催化活性,在573 K、4.0 MPa条件下,噻吩加氢脱硫的转化率均大于97.0%,加入阳离子表面活性剂的Mo-S-C催化活性最高,噻吩转化率可达到99.9%。MoS₂催化剂的活性顺序为Mo-S-C>Mo-S-S>Mo-S-P>Mo-S-N。     

高表面积复合氧化物Co-O-Si的制备及其催化1-己烯骨架异构和噻吩加氢脱硫活性

通过硝酸钴与硅酸钠共沉淀、辅以正丁醇干燥技术制备了具有原子分散度的Co-O-Si复合氧化物（Co/Si原子比 ≈ 0.65）,该催化剂具有较大的比表面积（562 m²/g）和较强表面酸性. 在硫化处理后,能够形成高度分散的硫化物活性组分,在模型汽油加氢处理反应中显示了较高的催化活性,在573 K时,噻吩的加氢脱硫活性可达99.4%,同时,1-己烯的骨架异构收率达到了35%. 该催化剂虽然不含Mo,其加氢脱硫活性可与工业催化剂Co-Mo/γ-Al₂O₃相当. 而在汽油深度加氢脱硫过程中,直链烯烃往往被加氢饱和,造成辛烷值损失. 该催化剂则可使部分直链烯烃发生骨架异构而生成异构烷烃,可减少深度加氢脱硫过程中的辛烷值损失.     

Novel MWCNT-Support for Co-Mo Sulfide Catalyst in HDS of Thiophene and HDN of Pyrrole

With home-made multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs, simplified as CNTs in later text) as support, CNT-supported Co-Mo-S catalysts, denoted as x%(mass percentage) MoiCoj/CNTs, were prepared. Their catalytic performance for thiophene hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and pyrrole hydrodenitrification (HDN) reactions was studied, and compared with the reference system supported by AC. Over the 7.24%Mo3Co1/CNTs catalyst at reaction condition of 1.5 MPa, 613 K, C4H4S/H2=3.7/96.3(molar ratio) and GHSV≈8000 mlSTp/(g-cat·h), the specific HDS activity of thiophene reached 3.29 mmolc4H4s/(s·molMo), which was 1.32 times as high as that (2.49 mmolC4H4s/(s·molMo)) of the AC-based counterpart, and was 2.47 times as high as that (1.33 mmolC4H4s/(s·molMo)) of the catalysts supported by AC with the respective optimal Mo3Co1-loading amount, 16.90%Mo3Co1/AC. Analogous reaction-chemical behaviours were also observed in the case of pyrrole HDN. It was experimentally found that using the CNTs in place of AC as support of the catalyst caused little change in the apparent ac-tivation energy for the thiophene HDS or pyrrole HDN reaction, but led to a significant increase in the concentration of catalytically active Mo-species (Mo4 ) at the surface of the functioning catalyst. On the other hand, H2-TPD measurements revealed that the CNT-supported catalyst could reversibly adsorb a greater amount of hydrogen under atmospheric pressure at temperatures ranging from room temperature to about 673 K. This unique feature would help to generate microenvironments with higher stationary-state concentration of active hydrogen-adspecies at the surface of the functioning catalyst. Both factors mentioned above were favorable to increasing the rate of thiophene HDS and pyrrole HDN reactions.     

Kinetics of thiophene hydrodesulfurization over a supported Mo–Co–Ni catalyst

In this study, the kinetics of thiophene (TH) hydrodesulfurization (HDS) over the Mo–Co–Ni-supported catalyst was investigated. Trimetallic catalyst was synthesized by pore volume impregnation and the metal loadings were 11.5 wt % Mo, 2 wt % Co, and 2 wt % Ni. A large surface area of 243 m²/g and a relatively large pore volume of 0.34 cm³/g for the fresh Mo–Co–Ni-supported catalyst indicate a good accessibility to the catalytic centers for the HDS reaction. The acid strength distribution of the fresh and spent catalysts, as well as for the support, was determined by thermal desorption of diethylamine (DEA) with increase in temperature from 20 to 600 °C. The weak acid centers are obtained within a temperature range between 160 and 300 °C, followed by medium acid sites up to 440 °C. The strong acid centers are revealed above 440 °C. We found a higher content of weak acid centers for fresh and spent catalysts as well as alumina as compared to medium and strong acid sites. The catalyst stability in terms of conversion as a function of time on stream in a fixed bed flow reactor was examined and almost no loss in the catalyst activity was observed. Consequently, this fact demonstrated superior activity of the Mo–Co–Ni-based catalyst for TH HDS. The activity tests by varying the temperature from 200 to 275 °C and pressure from 30 to 60 bar with various space velocities of 1–4 h^?1 were investigated. A Langmuir–Hinshelwood model was used to analyze the kinetic data and to derive activation energy and adsorption parameters for TH HDS. The effect of temperature, pressure, and liquid hourly space velocity on the TH HDS activity was studied.     

Titania-supported mixed HPMoV polyoxometallates as precursors of hydrodesulfurization catalysts

HDS catalysts were prepared by loading H₃PMo₁₂O₄₀ or H₄PMo₁₁V₁O₄₀ polyoxometallates on TiO₂ (0.5 and 1.0 mmol (Mo+V)). Activity of the catalysts was tested in the HDS of thiophene. The activity of catalysts of low concentration was 2–3 times higher than the activity of those of high concentration. Temperature programmed reduction (TPR) and IR spectroscopy were used to determine the properties of the catalyst. TPR measurements proved that vanadium promotes and stabilizes HDS activity due to an increase in the Mo⁵⁺/Mo⁴⁺ ratio.     

Hydrodesulfurization of Selective Catalytic Cracked Gasoline

Hydrodesulfurization (HDS) reaction of catalytic cracked gasoline (CCG) on Co–Mo/γ-Al₂O₃ was investigated in detail to make clear the important factors for deep HDS of CCG. A CCG containing 229 ppm sulfur and 30.4 vol% olefins was used in this study. Eleven alkylthiophenes and 2 alkylbenzothiophenes, 3 alkylthiacyclopentanes, and 2 disulfides were identified in this CCG by means of GC-AED analyses. In the reaction at 220 °C and 1.6 MPa using a conventional flow reactor of bench pilot scale, these sulfur compounds were hydrodesulfurized, whereas thiols were produced from H₂S and olefins. The reactions of thiophene HDS, isoolefin and n-olefin hydrogenation (HG) were studied to clarify the active sites on the catalyst. First, the effect of H₂S on the reaction was examined. The HG of n-olefin as well as thiophene HDS was inhibited by H₂S, while the HG of isoolefin was promoted. The effects of Co on these three reactions were also examined over the catalysts with different Co/(Co + Mo) ratios. Thiophene HDS was promoted by Co, while isoolefin HG was little affected and n-olefin HG was largely retarded. From these examinations, three types of active sites for thiophene HDS, isoolefin HG and n-olefin HG were proposed. Oligomers of isoolefins were found in the isoolefin hydrotreated product. The possibility of improving the HDS selectivity by carbonaceous deposit was investigated for HDS reactions of CCG and model compounds. The coking pretreatment was carried out on the catalyst and each reaction was examined. HDS selectivity (higher activity for HDS and lower activity for olefin HG) on CCGHDS was improved. Relative deactivation was in the following order, isoolefin HG > thiophene HDS > n-olefin HG. Pyridine modification (i.e. pyridine injection at 150 °C and partial pyridine desorption at 300 °C) was investigated on thiophene and olefins reaction. Thiophene HDS was little affected. Olefin HG and thiol production reaction were strongly inhibited. Improvement of HDS selectivity was observed in the reactions of CCG after pyridine modification. Improvement of HDS selectivity by pyridine modification was considered to result from the selective deactivation of the active sites for olefin reactions (hydrogenation and thiol production).     

Unsupported Molybdenum and Cobalt-Molybdenum Nitrides for Thiophene Hydrodesulfurization

The catalytic activity and the structure of unsupported Mo and CoMo nitrided catalysts were investigated. It was found that the structure and catalytic activity of the nitrided catalysts are influenced by the conditions of nitridation. Molybdenum oxynitrides are more active in hydrodesulfurization (HDS) of thiophene than MoS₂. The addition of cobalt to nitrided Mo improves its HDS activity, however, sulfided CoMo catalyst is still more active than the nitrided one. Synergy between Co and Mo for the nitrided unsupported CoMo catalyst exists at lower degree than for the sulfided form of CoMo.     

Study of Carbon Nanotube Supported Co-Mo Selective Hydrodesulphurization Catalysts for Fluid Catalytic Cracking Gasoline

In this paper, carbon nanotube supported Co-Mo catalysts for selective hydrodesulphurization （HDS） of fluid catalytic cracking （FCC） gasoline were studied, using di-isobutylene, cyclohexene, 1-octene and thiophene as model compounds to simulate FCC gasoline. The results show that the Co-Mo/CNT has very high HDS activity and HDS/hydrogenation selectivity comparing with the Co-Mo/γ-Al2O3 and Co-Mo/AC catalyst systems. The saturation ratio of cyclohexene was lower than 50%, and the saturation ratio of 1,3-di-isobutylene lower than 60% for the Co-Mo/CNT catalysts. Co/Mo atomic ratio was found to be one of the most important key factors in influencing the hydrogenation selectivity and HDS activity, and the most suitable Co/Mo atomic ratio was 0.4. Co/CNT and Mo/CNT mono-metallic catalysts showed lower HDS activity and selectivity than the Co-Mo/CNT bi-metallic catalysts.     

Improvement of HDS catalysts through the modification of the oxidic precursor with 1,5-pentanediol: Gas phase sulfidation and thiophene conversion

The performance, in thiophene HDS, of a CoMo/Al₂O₃ catalyst was successfully improved through chemical modification of its oxidic precursor by impregnation with 1,5-pentanediol solution. The gas phase activation with a H₂/H₂S mixture was followed by thermogravimetric analysis coupled with a rapid chromatograph; the catalysts were characterized at different steps of the activation using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). It appeared that the addition of the organic agent retards the sulfidation of the supported metals, leading to a simultaneous sulfidation of Co and Mo atoms. This induces the formation of smaller MoS₂ slabs and thus an increase in the number of active CoMoS sites, directly correlated with the better HDS performance of the modified solid. The role of 1,5-pentanediol is likely to inhibit, at low temperature, the adsorption of H₂S on the solid and thus the sulfidation of the supported metals.     

二苯并噻吩和吲哚在NiMoS/γ-Al2O3上加氢脱硫和加氢脱氮反应的相互影响

在固定床高压微反装置上考察了预硫化型NiMoS/γ-Al2O3催化剂上二苯并噻吩（DBT）加氢脱硫（HDS）反应和吲哚加氢脱氮（HDN）反应之间的相互影响。结果表明,吲哚对DBT的加氢脱硫反应具有抑制作用,其中对加氢路径（HYD）比对氢解路径（DDS）的抑制作用强,温度升高后,吲哚的抑制作用减弱。吲哚对DBT加氢脱硫反应的抑制作用源于吲哚及其HDN反应的中间产物在活性位上的竞争吸附。DBT和原位生成的H2S促进了催化剂表面硫阴离子空穴（CUS）向B酸位的转化,从而提高1,2-二氢吲哚（HIN）分子中C(sp3)—N键的断裂能力,使得吲哚的转化率和产物中邻乙基苯胺（OEA）的相对含量增大。HDN活性相的形成虽然需要硫原子的参与,但是活性相的保持并不需要大量的硫原子,较高含量硫化物存在时加氢活性位减少,不利于脱氮反应。     

Ni_2P/TiO_2-Al_2O_3催化剂的制备及其加氢脱硫、脱氮性能

采用溶胶-凝胶法制备了TiO2-Al2O3复合载体,采用浸渍法制备了Ni2P/TiO2-Al2O3催化剂,并用X射线衍射(XRD)、N2吸附比表面积(BET)测定、热重-差热分析(TG-DTA)、X射线光电子能谱(XPS)等技术对催化剂的结构和性质进行了表征.催化剂加氢脱硫(HDS)和脱氮(HDN)活性评价在实验室固定床连续反应装置上,以噻吩和吡啶为模型反应物进行.考察了不同载体、Ni2P负载量、标称Ni/P摩尔比、催化剂焙烧温度对Ni2P/TiO2-Al2O3催化剂上同时进行的噻吩加氢脱硫和吡啶加氢脱氮性能的影响.结果表明,TiO2含量为80%(w)的TiO2-Al2O3复合氧化物为载体,Ni2P负载量为30.0%(w),标称Ni/P摩尔比为1/2,催化剂焙烧温度为500℃时,Ni2P/TiO2-Al2O3催化剂加氢脱硫脱氮活性最高.在360℃,3.0MPa,氢油比800(V/V),液时体积空速1.5h-1的条件下,噻吩HDS和吡啶HDN转化率分别为61.32%和64.43%.