In situ synthesis of mononuclear copper(II) complexes of the new tridentate ligand bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine

Two mononuclear copper complexes, {bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN²)methyl]amine‐κN}(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐κN²)(perchlorato‐κO)copper(II) perchlorate, [Cu(ClO₄)(C₅H₈N₂)(C₁₂H₁₉N₅)]ClO₄, (I), and {bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN²)methyl]amine‐κN}bis(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐κN²)copper(II) bis(hexafluoridophosphate), [Cu(C₅H₈N₂)₂(C₁₂H₁₉N₅)](PF₆)₂, (II), have been synthesized by the reactions of different copper salts with the tripodal ligand tris[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine (TDPA) in acetone–water solutions at room temperature. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis revealed that they contain the new tridentate ligand bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine (BDPA), which cannot be obtained by normal organic reactions and has thus been captured in the solid state by in situ synthesis. The coordination of the Cu^II ion is distorted square pyramidal in (I) and distorted trigonal bipyramidal in (II). The new in situ generated tridentate BDPA ligand can act as a meridional or facial ligand during the process of coordination. The crystal structures of these two compounds are stabilized by classical hydrogen bonding as well as intricate nonclassical hydrogen‐bond interactions.     

X‐ray and DFT studies of a mono‐ and binuclear copper(II) ionic compound containing a Schiff base

In the structure of trans‐bis(ethanol‐κO)tetrakis(1H‐imidazole‐κN³)copper(II) bis[μ‐N‐(2‐oxidobenzylidene)‐D,L‐glutamato]‐κ⁴O¹,N,O^2′:O^2′;κ⁴O^2′:O¹,N,O^2′‐bis[(1H‐imidazole‐κN³)cuprate(II)], [Cu(C₃H₄N₂)₄(C₂H₆O)₂][Cu₂(C₁₅H₁₄N₃O₅)₂], both ions are located on centres of inversion. The cation is mononuclear, showing a distorted octahedral coordination, while the anion is a binuclear centrosymmetric dimer with a square‐pyramidal copper(II) coordination. An extensive three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding network is formed between the ions. According to B3LYP/6–31G* calculations, the two equivalent components of the anion are in doublet states (spin density located mostly on Cu^II ions) and are coupled as a triplet, with only marginal preference over an open‐shell singlet.     

Self‐Assembly and Structure of Cobalt(II) Complexes Using Diaminodiamide Ligands

The self‐assembly of Co(II) with two diaminodiamide ligands, 4,7‐diazadecanediamide and 4,8‐diazaundecanediamide, gave two different crystals, [(C₈H₁₈N₄O₂)Co(OH)₂Co(C₈H₁₈N₄O₂)]Cl₂ ( 1 ) [Co(C₉H₂₀N₄O₂)(Cl)(H₂O)]·Cl·2H₂O ( 2 ). Structures of 1 and 2 were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Structural data for 1 shows a novel type of binuclear complex with distorted octahederal coordination geometry around the Co atoms through the hydroxo bridges. By using inter‐connector N‐H···N hydrogen bonding interactions as building forces, each cationic moiety [(C₈H₁₈N₄O₂)Co(OH)₂Co(C₈H₁₈N₄O₂)]²⁺ is linked to neighboring ones, producing a charged hydrogen‐bonded 1D chain‐like structure. The chains are further connected into a 2D layer in a (4,4)‐topology via N‐H···Cl_free hydrogen‐bonding interactions. Structural data for 2 indicate that the cobalt atom adopts a six‐coordinated N₂O₄ environment, giving a distorted octahedral geometry, where two N‐ and two O‐donor sets of ligand located at equatorial positions and one water and one chloride occupied at axial positions. Through NH···Cl‐Co and OH···Cl‐Co contacts, each cationic moiety [Co(C₉H₂₀N₄O₂)(Cl)(H₂O)]⁺ in 2 is linked to neighboring ones, producing a charged hydrogen‐bonded 1D chainlike structure. Thus, the crystal‐engineering approach has proved successful in the solid‐state packing due to steric strain effect of the diaminodiamide ligand.     

Effect of pH on the charge‐assisted hydrogen‐bonded assembly of the anionic [Cu(oxalate)2]2− building unit and N,N′‐ditopic cations

By the solvothermal reaction under acidic conditions of Cu(NO₃)₂·3H₂O, Na₂C₂O₄ and the N,N′‐ditopic organic coligands 1‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)piperazine (ppz) and 1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethane (bpa), two novel anionic copper(II) coordination compounds were obtained, namely the one‐dimensional coordination polymer catena‐poly[4‐(pyridin‐1‐ium‐4‐yl)piperazin‐1‐ium [[(oxalato‐κ²O¹,O²)copper(II)]‐μ‐oxalato‐κ³O¹,O²:O^1′]], {(C₉H₁₅N₃)[Cu(C₂O₄)₂)]}_n or {(H₂ppz)[Cu(C₂O₄)₂]}_n, (I), and the discrete ionic complex 4,4′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)dipyridinium bis(oxalato‐κ²O¹,O²)copper(II), (C₁₂H₁₄N₂)[Cu(C₂O₄)₂] or (H₂bpa)[Cu(C₂O₄)₂], (II). The products were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, elemental analysis, powder X‐ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analyses and UV and IR spectroscopic techniques. The [Cu(C₂O₄)₂]²⁻ units for (I) and (II) are stabilized by H₂ppz²⁺ and H₂bpa²⁺ cations, respectively, via charge‐assisted hydrogen bonds. Also, a study of the pH‐controlled synthesis of this system shows that (I) was obtained at pH values of 2–4. When using bpa, a two‐dimensional square‐grid network of [Cu(C₂O₄)(bpa)]_n was obtained at a pH of 4. This indicates that the pH of the reaction also plays a key role in the structural assembly and coordination abilities of oxalate and N,N′‐ditopic coligands.     

Dimeric copper(II) trimethylsilyl­acetate adducts with pyridine, 2‐­methylpyridine, 3‐methylpyridine and quinoline,and a polymeric copper(II) trimethylsilylacetate

In the crystals of bis(pyridine‐N)tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₅H₅N)₂], (I), the dinuclear Cu^II complexes have cage structures with Cu?Cu distances of 2.632 (1) and 2.635 (1) Å. In the crystals of bis(2‐­methylpyridine‐N)tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (II), bis­(3‐methylpyridine‐N)tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (III), and bis(quinoline‐N)­tetrakis(μ‐­trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₉H₇N)₂], (IV), the centrosymmetric dinuclear Cu^II complexes have a cage structure with Cu?Cu distances of 2.664 (1), 2.638 (3) and 2.665 (1) Å, respectively. In the crystals of catena‐poly­[tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II)], [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄]_n, (V), the dinuclear Cu^II units of a cage structure are linked by the cyclic Cu—O bonds at the apical positions to form a linear chain by use of a glide translation.     

Two nickel(II) bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine complexes with homophthalic and benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylic acids

Two new Ni^II complexes involving the ancillary ligand bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine (bpma) and two different carboxylate ligands, i.e. homophthalate [hph; systematic name: 2‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)acetate] and benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylate (btc), namely catena‐poly[[aqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)]‐μ‐2‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)aceteto‐κ²O:O′], [Ni(C₉H₆O₄)(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)(H₂O)]_n, and (μ‐benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylato‐κ⁴O¹,O²:O⁴,O⁵)bis(aqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)) bis(triaqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)) benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylate hexahydrate, [Ni₂(C₁₀H₂O₈)(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)₂(H₂O)₂]·[Ni(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)(H₂O)₃]₂(C₁₀H₂O₈)·6H₂O, (II), are presented. Compound (I) is a one‐dimensional polymer with hph acting as a bridging ligand and with the chains linked by weak C—H...O interactions. The structure of compound (II) is much more complex, with two independent Ni^II centres having different environments, one of them as part of centrosymmetric [Ni(bpma)(H₂O)]₂(btc) dinuclear complexes and the other in mononuclear [Ni(bpma)(H₂O)₃]²⁺ cations which (in a 2:1 ratio) provide charge balance for btc⁴⁻ anions. A profuse hydrogen‐bonding scheme, where both coordinated and crystal water molecules play a crucial role, provides the supramolecular linkage of the different groups.     

Tracking the dissolution–recrystallization structural transformation (DRST) of copper(II) complexes: a combined crystallographic,mass spectrometric and DFT study

Methanol‐ and temperature‐induced dissolution–recrystallization structural transformation (DRST) was observed among two novel Cu^II complexes. This is first time that the combination of X‐ray crystallography, mass spectrometry and density functional theory (DFT) theoretical calculations has been used to describe the fragmentation and recombination of a mononuclear Cu^II complex at 60 °C in methanol to obtain a binuclear copper(II) complex. Combining time‐dependent high‐resolution electrospray mass spectrometry, we propose a possible mechanism for the conversion of bis(8‐methoxyquinoline‐κ²N,O)bis(thiocyanato‐κN)copper(II), [Cu(NCS)₂(C₁₀H₉NO)₂], Cu1 , to di‐μ‐methanolato‐κ⁴O:O‐bis[(8‐methoxyquinoline‐κ²N,O)(thiocyanato‐κN)copper(II)], [Cu₂(CH₃O)₂(NCS)₂(C₁₀H₉NO)₂], Cu2 , viz. [Cu(SCN)₂( L )₂] ( Cu1 ) → [Cu( L )₂] → [Cu( L )]/ L → [Cu₂(CH₃O)₂(NCS)₂( L )₂] ( Cu2 ). We screened the antitumour activities of L (8‐methoxyquinoline), Cu1 and Cu2 and found that the antiproliferative effect of Cu2 on some tumour cells was much greater than that of L and Cu1 .     

The crystal and molecular structures of three copper‐containing complexes and their activities in mimicking galactose oxidase

The structures of three copper‐containing complexes, namely (benzoato‐κ²O,O′)[(E)‐2‐({[2‐(diethylamino)ethyl]imino}methyl)phenolato‐κ³N,N′,O]copper(II) dihydrate, [Cu(C₇H₅O₂)(C₁₃H₁₉N₂O)]·2H₂O, 1 , [(E)‐2‐({[2‐(diethylamino)ethyl]imino}methyl)phenolato‐κ³N,N′,O](2‐phenylacetato‐κ²O,O′)copper(II), [Cu(C₈H₇O₂)(C₁₃H₁₉N₂O)], 2 , and bis[μ‐(E)‐2‐({[3‐(diethylamino)propyl]imino}methyl)phenolato]‐κ⁴N,N′,O:O;κ⁴O:N,N′,O‐(μ‐2‐methylbenzoato‐κ²O:O′)copper(II) perchlorate, [Cu₂(C₈H₇O₂)(C₁₂H₁₇N₂O)₂]ClO₄, 3 , have been reported and all have been tested for their activity in the oxidation of d ‐galactose. The results suggest that, unlike the enzyme galactose oxidase, due to the precipitation of Cu₂O, this reaction is not catalytic as would have been expected. The structures of 1 and 2 are monomeric, while 3 consists of a dimeric cation and a perchlorate anion [which is disordered over two orientations, with occupancies of 0.64 (4) and 0.36 (4)]. In all three structures, the central Cu atom is five‐coordinated in a distorted square‐pyramidal arrangment (τ parameter of 0.0932 for 1 , 0.0888 for 2 , and 0.142 and 0.248 for the two Cu centers in 3 ). In each species, the environment about the Cu atom is such that the vacant sixth position is open, with very little steric crowding.     

Syntheses and structures of discrete copper(II) and cadmium(II) supramolecular complexes based on 1,4‐diacylthiosemicarbazone ligands

Thiosemicarbazides and their metal complexes have attracted considerable interest because of their biological activities and their flexibility, which allows the ligands to bend and rotate freely to accommodate the coordination geometries of various metal centres. Discrete copper(II) and cadmium(II) complexes have been prepared by crystallization of N‐[2‐(2‐hydroxybenzoyl)hydrazinecarbonothioyl]propanamide (H₃L) with Cu(CH₃COO)₂ or Cd(NO₃)₂ in a dimethylformamide/methanol mixed‐solvent system at room temperature, affording the complexes di‐μ‐acetato‐bis{μ₄‐1‐[(2‐oxidophenyl)carbonyl]‐2‐(propanamidomethanethioyl)hydrazine‐1,2‐diido}tetracopper(II) dimethylformamide disolvate, [Cu₄(C₁₁H₁₀N₃O₃S)₂(C₂H₃O₂)₂]·2C₃H₇NO, (I), and bis{μ₂‐[(2‐hydroxyphenyl)formamido](propanamidomethanethioyl)azanido}bis[(4,4′‐bipyridine)nitratocadmium(II)] dihydrate, [Cd₂(C₁₁H₁₂N₃O₃S)₂(NO₃)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂]·2H₂O, (II). Complex (I) consists of four Cu^II cations, two μ₄‐bridging trianionic ligands and two μ₂‐bridging acetate ligands, while complex (II) is composed of two Cd^II cations, two μ₂‐bridging monoanionic ligands, two nitrate ligands and two 4,4′‐bipyridine ligands. These discrete complexes are connected by hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions to form a three‐dimensional supramolecular architecture. Compared with (I), the phenolic hydroxy group and hydrazide N atom of the thiosemicarbazide ligand of (II) are not involved in coordination and lead to a binuclear Cd^II complex. This different coordination mode may be attributed to the larger ionic radius of the Cd^II ion compared with the Cu^II ion.     

Comparison of two polymeric transition metal complexes with 1,4‐benzenedicarboxylate ions as bridging ligands, [Co(C8H4O4)(C12H8N2)(H2O)] and [Cu(C8H4O4)(C10H9N3)]·H2O

The title complexes, catena‐poly[[aqua(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)­cobalt(II)]‐μ‐benzene‐1,4‐di­carboxyl­ato‐κ²O¹:O⁴], [Co(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₂H₈N₂)(H₂O)], (I), and catena‐poly[[[(di‐2‐pyridyl‐κN‐amine)copper(II)]‐μ‐benzene‐1,4‐di­carboxyl­ato‐κ⁴O¹,O^1′:O⁴,O^4′] hydrate], [Cu(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]·H₂O, (II), take the form of zigzag chains, with the 1,4‐benzene­di­carboxyl­ate ion acting as an amphimonodentate ligand in (I) and a bis‐bidentate ligand in (II). The Co^II ion in (I) is five‐coordinate and has a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal geometry. The Cu^II ion in (II) is in a very distorted octahedral 4+2 environment, with the octahedron elongated along the trans O—Cu—O bonds and with a trans O—Cu—O angle of only 137.22 (8)°.     

[{Cu(phen)2}(μ‐malato){Cu(phen)(NO3)}](NO3)·4H2O: malate acting as a tetra­dentate and dibridging ligand in a dinuclear copper complex

The crystal structure of the title compound, μ‐2‐hydroxy­butane­dioato‐1κ²O⁴,O^4′:2κ³O¹,O²,O⁴‐nitrato‐2κO‐tris­(1,10‐phen­anthroline)‐1κ⁴N,N′;2κ²N,N′‐dicopper(II) nitrate tetra­hydrate, [Cu₂(C₄H₃O₅)(NO₃)(C₁₂H₈N₂)₃](NO₃)·4H₂O, contains an unsymmetrical dinuclear copper complex with Cu(phen)₂ and Cu(phen)(NO₃) moieties (phen is 1,10‐phenanthroline) bridged by a malate (2‐hydroxy­butane­dioate) ligand, which acts as a double‐bridging and tetra­dentate ligand. As a result of this double‐bridging action, especially the direct coordination of the O atom of one carboxyl­ate group of malate to the two Cu atoms, the Cu⋯Cu distance is only 4.199 (1) Å and the two phen planes are roughly parallel [the shortest inter­planar distance is 3.28 (1) Å], exhibiting an obvious intra­molecular π–π stacking inter­action.     

[Cu(phen)2(μ‐IDA)Cu(phen)](ClO4)2·CH3OH: tridentate and monodentate binding to two copper(II) species by a bridging ligand

The stoichiometric reaction of 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen), imino­di­acetic acid (IDA‐H₂) and Cu(ClO₄)₂ in a H₂O–CH₃OH (2:1) solution yields μ‐imino­diacetato‐2:1κ⁴O,N,O′:O′′‐tris(1,10‐phenanthroline)‐1κ⁴N,N′;2κ²N,N′‐dicopper(II) diperchlorate methanol solvate, [Cu₂(C₄H₅NO₄)(C₁₂H₈N₂)₃](ClO₄)₂·CH₃OH. The IDA ligand bridges the two Cu^II ions via a carboxyl­ate group and uses one further N and an O atom of the second carboxylate group to complete a fac‐tridentate coordination at one Cu centre. A phen ligand completes a distorted square‐pyramidal coordination at this metal atom, although there is weak coordination by a perchlorate O atom at a sixth position. The second Cu centre has a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal coordination to two phen moieties and a carboxyl­ate O atom.     

Synthesis,structure and photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes of a copper(II) metal–organic framework (Cu–MOF) with a 4‐coordinated three‐dimensional CdSO4 topology

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted much interest in the fields of gas separation and storage, catalysis synthesis, nonlinear optics, sensors, luminescence, magnetism, photocatalysis gradation and crystal engineering because of their diverse properties and intriguing topologies. A Cu–MOF, namely poly[[(μ₂‐succinato‐κ²O:O′){μ₂‐tris[4‐(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)phenyl]amine‐κ²N:N′}copper(II)] dihydrate], {[Cu(C₄H₄O₄)(C₂₄H₁₈N₁₀)]·2H₂O}_n or {[Cu(suc)(ttpa)]·2H₂O}_n, (I), was synthesized by the hydrothermal method using tris[4‐(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)phenyl]amine (ttpa) and succinate (suc^2?), and characterized by IR, powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD), luminescence, optical band gap and valence band X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (VB XPS). Cu–MOF (I) shows a twofold interpenetrating 4‐coordinated three‐dimensional CdSO₄ topology with point symbol {6⁵·8}. It presents good photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (MB) and rhodamine B (RhB) under visible‐light irradiation. A photocatalytic mechanism was proposed and confirmed.     

Three polymorphs of an inclusion compound of 2,2′‐(disulfanediyl)dibenzoic acid and trimethylamine

Polymorphism is the ability of a solid material to exist in more than one form or crystal structure and this is of interest in the fields of crystal engineering and solid‐state chemistry. 2,2′‐(Disulfanediyl)dibenzoic acid (also called 2,2′‐dithiosalicylic acid, DTSA) is able to form different hydrogen bonds using its carboxyl groups. The central bridging S atoms allow the two terminal arene rings to rotate freely to generate various hydrogen‐bonded linking modes. DTSA can act as a potential host molecule with suitable guest molecules to develop new inclusion compounds. We report here the crystal structures of three new polymorphs of the inclusion compound of DTSA and trimethylamine, namely trimethylazanium 2‐[(2‐carboxyphenyl)disulfanyl]benzoate 2,2′‐(disulfanediyl)dibenzoic acid monosolvate, C₃H₁₀N⁺·C₁₄H₉O₄S₂⁻·C₁₄H₁₀O₄S₂, (1), tetrakis(trimethylazanium) bis{2‐[(2‐carboxyphenyl)disulfanyl]benzoate} 2,2′‐(disulfanediyl)dibenzoate 2,2′‐(disulfanediyl)dibenzoic acid monosolvate, 4C₃H₁₀N⁺·2C₁₄H₉O₄S₂⁻·C₁₄H₈O₄S₂²⁻·C₁₄H₁₀O₄S₂, (2), and trimethylazanium 2‐[(2‐carboxyphenyl)disulfanyl]benzoate, C₃H₁₀N⁺·C₁₄H₉O₄S₂⁻, (3). In the three polymorphs, DTSA utilizes its carboxyl groups to form conventional O—H…O hydrogen bonds to generate different host lattices. The central N atoms of the guest amine molecules accept H atoms from DTSA molecules to give the corresponding cations, which act as counter‐ions to produce the stable crystal structures via N—H…O hydrogen bonding between the host acid and the guest molecule. It is noticeable that although these three compounds are composed of the same components, the final crystal structures are totally different due to the various configurations of the host acid, the number of guest molecules and the inducer (i.e. ancillary experimental acid).     

Structural and spectroscopic characterization of two new blue luminescent pyridylbenzimidazole zinc(II) complexes

Luminescent metal complexes are used in photooptical devices. Zinc(II) complexes are of interest because of the ability to tune their color, their high thermal stability and their favorable carrier transport character. In particular, some zinc(II) complexes with aryl diimine and/or heterocyclic ligands have been shown to emit brightly in the blue region of the spectrum. Zinc(II) complexes bearing derivatized imidazoles have been explored for possible optoelectronic applications. The structures of two zinc(II) complexes of 5,6‐dimethyl‐2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1‐[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐benzimidazole (L), namely dichlorido(dimethylformamide‐κO){5,6‐dimethyl‐2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)‐1‐[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐benzimidazole‐κN³}zinc(II) dimethylformamide monosolvate, [ZnCl₂(C₂₀H₁₈N₄)(C₃H₇NO)]·C₃H₇NO, (I), and bis(acetato‐κ²O,O′){5,6‐dimethyl‐2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)‐1‐[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐benzimidazole‐κN³}zinc(II) ethanol monosolvate, [Zn(C₂H₃O₂)₂(C₂₀H₁₈N₄)]·C₂H₅OH, (II), are reported. Complex (I) crystallized as a dimethylformamide solvate and exhibits a distorted trigonal bipyramidal coordination geometry. The coordination sphere consists of a bidentate L ligand spanning axial to equatorial sites, two chloride ligands in equatorial sites, and an O‐bound dimethylformamide ligand in the remaining axial site. The other complex, (II), crystallized as an ethanol solvate. The Zn^II atom has a distorted trigonal prismatic coordination geometry, with two bidentate acetate ligands occupying two edges and a bidentate L ligand occupying the third edge of the prism. Complexes (I) and (II) emit in the blue region of the spectrum. The results of density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggest that the luminescence of L results from π*←π transitions and that the luminescence of the complexes results from interligand charge‐transfer transitions. The orientation of the 2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl) substituent with respect to the benzimidazole system was found to have an impact on the calculated HOMO–LUMO gap (HOMO is highest occupied molecular orbital and LUMO is lowest unoccupied molecular orbital).     

Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded framework structures in flunarizinium nicotinate and flunarizinediium bis(4‐toluenesulfonate) dihydrate

The structures of two salts of flunarizine, namely 1‐bis[(4‐fluorophenyl)methyl]‐4‐[(2E)‐3‐phenylprop‐2‐en‐1‐yl]piperazine, C₂₆H₂₆F₂N₂, are reported. In flunarizinium nicotinate {systematic name: 4‐bis[(4‐fluorophenyl)methyl]‐1‐[(2E)‐3‐phenylprop‐2‐en‐1‐yl]piperazin‐1‐ium pyridine‐3‐carboxylate}, C₂₆H₂₇F₂N₂⁺·C₆H₄NO₂⁻, (I), the two ionic components are linked by a short charge‐assisted N—H...O hydrogen bond. The ion pairs are linked into a three‐dimensional framework structure by three independent C—H...O hydrogen bonds, augmented by C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds and an aromatic π–π stacking interaction. In flunarizinediium bis(4‐toluenesulfonate) dihydrate {systematic name: 1‐[bis(4‐fluorophenyl)methyl]‐4‐[(2E)‐3‐phenylprop‐2‐en‐1‐yl]piperazine‐1,4‐diium bis(4‐methylbenzenesulfonate) dihydrate}, C₂₆H₂₈F₂N₂²⁺·2C₇H₇O₃S⁻·2H₂O, (II), one of the anions is disordered over two sites with occupancies of 0.832 (6) and 0.168 (6). The five independent components are linked into ribbons by two independent N—H...O hydrogen bonds and four independent O—H...O hydrogen bonds, and these ribbons are linked to form a three‐dimensional framework by two independent C—H...O hydrogen bonds, but C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds and aromatic π–π stacking interactions are absent from the structure of (II). Comparisons are made with some related structures.     

2,6‐Bis(azaindole)pyridine: reactivity with iron(III) and copper(II) salts

1‐[6‐(1H‐Pyrrolo[2,3‐b]pyridin‐1‐yl)pyridin‐2‐yl]‐1H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐b]pyridin‐7‐ium tetrachloridoferrate(III), (C₁₉H₁₄N₅)[FeCl₄], (II), and [2,6‐bis(1H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐b]pyridin‐1‐yl‐κN⁷)pyridine‐κN]bis(nitrato‐κO)copper(II), [Cu(NO₃)₂(C₁₉H₁₃N₅)], (III), were prepared by self‐assembly from FeCl₃·6H₂O or Cu(NO₃)₂·3H₂O and 2,6‐bis(1H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐b]pyridin‐1‐yl)pyridine [commonly called 2,6‐bis(azaindole)pyridine, bap], C₁₉H₁₃N₅, (I). Compound (I) crystallizes with Z′ = 2 in the P space group, with both independent molecules adopting a trans–trans conformation. Compound (II) is a salt complex with weak C—H...Cl interactions giving rise to a zigzag network with π‐stacking down the a axis. Complex (III) lies across a twofold rotation axis in the C2/c space group. The Cu^II center in (III) has an N₃O₂ trigonal–bipyramidal environment. The nitrate ligand coordinates in a monodentate fashion, while the bap ligand adopts a twisted tridentate binding mode. C—H...O interactions give rise to a ribbon motif.     

Completing the bis[hydroxybis(pyridin‐2‐yl)methanesulfonato‐κ3N,O,N′]MII series (M = Mn to Zn) with the copper(II) and cobalt(II) structures

The Cu^II complex bis[hydroxybis(pyridin‐2‐yl)methanesulfonato‐κ³N,O,N′]copper(II) hexahydrate, [Cu(C₁₁H₉N₂O₄S)₂]·6H₂O, (I), crystallizes in the space group P, compared with P2₁/c for the anhydrous Co^II analogue bis[hydroxybis(pyridin‐2‐yl)methanesulfonato‐κ³N,O,N′]cobalt(II), [Co(C₁₁H₉N₂O₄S)₂], (II). However, both molecules sit on a crystallographic inversion centre and are thus very similar in appearance. Jahn–Teller elongation of the Cu—O bonds [2.347 (3) Å in (I) and 2.064 (2) Å in (II)] influences the S—O bond lengths, which are all around 1.455 (3) Å in (I) and 1.436 (2)–1.473 (2) Å in (II).     

(Benzoyl­acetonato)­chloro(1,10‐phen­anthroline)copper(II)

The crystal structure of the title compound, chloro(1,10‐phenanthroline‐N,N′)(1‐phenyl‐1,3‐butane­dion­ato‐O,O′)copper(II), [CuCl(C₁₀H₉O₂)(C₁₂H₈N₂)], has been determined. The Cu^II ion displays a distorted square‐pyramidal coordination, being linked to the two O atoms of the benzoyl­acetonate ligand and the two N atoms of the 1,10‐phenanthroline ligand in the basal plane, and the Cl atom in the apical site. TheCu—N, Cu—O and Cu—Cl bond lengths are 2.043 (2)/2.025 (2), 1.914 (2)/1.941 (2) and 2.485 (1) Å, respectively.     

Hydrothermal synthesis,crystal structure and photoluminescence of two homochiral zinc(II) coordination polymers

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have potentially useful applications and an intriguing variety of architectures and topologies. Two homochiral coordination polymers have been synthesized by the hydrothermal method, namely poly[(μ‐N‐benzyl‐L‐phenylalaninato‐κ⁴O,O′:O,N)(μ‐formato‐κ²O:O′)zinc(II)], [Zn(C₁₆H₁₆NO₂)(HCOO)]_n, (1), and poly[(μ‐N‐benzyl‐L‐leucinato‐κ⁴O,O′:O,N)(μ‐formato‐κ²O:O′)zinc(II)], [Zn(C₁₃H₁₈NO₂)(HCOO)]_n, (2), and studied by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, elemental analyses, IR spectroscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy. Compounds (1) and (2) each have a two‐dimensional layer structure, with the benzyl or isobutyl groups of the ligands directed towards the interlayer interface. Photoluminescence investigations show that both (1) and (2) display a strong emission in the blue region.