Synthesis, characterization and reactivity studies of the new compound [Os3(CO)9(μ3-η,η,η-{C5H5FeC5H3CCC(S)C(Fc)CHO}]

Processes such as S-C and C-H bond activations as well as C-C coupling reactions have taken place in the synthesis of the new compound [Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃-η²,η³,η³-{C₅H₅FeC₅H₃CCC(S)C(Fc)CHO}] (Fc = C₅H₄FeC₅H₅), which contains an aldehyde oxametallacycle. A reactivity study of it has been carried out. In addition, other new triosmium clusters such as [Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃,η²-CCFc)(μ,η¹-SCCFc)], [Os₃(CO)₁₀(μ,η²-CCFc)(μ,η¹-SCCFc)] and [Os₃(CO)₉(μ-CO)(μ₃,η²-FcCCSCCFc)] have been prepared from the reaction of [Os₃(CO)₁₀(NCMe)₂] and FcCCSCCFc. All the compounds have been characterized by analytical and spectroscopic techniques. The crystal structures of [Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃,η²-CCFc)(μ,η¹-SCCFc)] and [Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃-η²,η³,η³-{C₅H₅FeC₅H₃CCC(S)C(Fc)CHO}] have been determined by X-ray crystallography and some electrochemical studies have also carried out.     

New Heteronuclear Bridged Borylene Complexes That Were Derived from [{Cp*CoCl}2] and Mono‐Metal?Carbonyl Fragments

The synthesis, structural characterization, and reactivity of new bridged borylene complexes are reported. The reaction of [{Cp*CoCl}₂] with LiBH₄ ? THF at ?70 °C, followed by treatment with [M(CO)₃(MeCN)₃] (M=W, Mo, and Cr) under mild conditions, yielded heteronuclear triply bridged borylene complexes, [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)M(CO)₅] ( 1 – 3 ; 1 : M=W, 2 : M=Mo, 3 : M=Cr). During the syntheses of complexes 1 – 3 , capped‐octahedral cluster [(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐H)(BH)₄{Co(CO)₂}] ( 4 ) was also isolated in good yield. Complexes 1 – 3 are isoelectronic and isostructural to [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO){Fe(CO)₃}] ( 5 ) and [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐CO){Mn(CO)₃}] ( 6 ), with a trigonal‐pyramidal geometry in which the μ₃‐BH ligand occupies the apical vertex. To test the reactivity of these borylene complexes towards bis‐phosphine ligands, the room‐temperature photolysis of complexes 1 – 3 , 5 , 6 , and [{(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Ru)Fe(CO)₃}₂(μ‐CO)] ( 7 ) was carried out. Most of these complexes led to decomposition, although photolysis of complex 7 with [Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂] (n=1–3) yielded complexes 9 – 11 , [3,4‐(Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂)‐closo‐1,2,3,4‐Ru₂Fe₂(BH)₂] ( 9 : n=1, 10 : n=2, 11 : n=3). Quantum‐chemical calculations by using DFT methods were carried out on compounds 1 – 3 and 9 – 11 and showed reasonable agreement with the experimentally obtained structural parameters, that is, large HOMO–LUMO gaps, in accordance with the high stabilities of these complexes, and NMR chemical shifts that accurately reflected the experimentally observed resonances. All of the new compounds were characterized in solution by using mass spectrometry, IR spectroscopy, and ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹¹B NMR spectroscopy and their structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of complexes 1 , 2 , 4 , 9 , and 10 .     

Asymmetric diosmium sawhorse complexes

Three asymmetric diosmium(I) carbonyl sawhorse complexes have been prepared by microwave heating. One of these complexes is of the type Os₂(μ‐O₂CR)(μ‐O₂CR′)(CO)₄L₂, with two different bridging carboxylate ligands, while the other two complexes are of the type Os₂(μ‐O₂CR)₂(CO)₅L, with one axial CO ligand and one axial phosphane ligand. The mixed carboxylate complex Os₂(μ‐acetate)(μ‐propionate)(CO)₄[P(p‐tolyl)₃]₂, ( 1 ), was prepared by heating Os₃(CO)₁₂ with a mixture of acetic and propionic acids, isolating Os₂(μ‐acetate)(μ‐propionate)(CO)₆, and then replacing two CO ligands with two phosphane ligands. This is the first example of an Os₂ sawhorse complex with two different carboxylate bridges. The syntheses of Os₂(μ‐acetate)₂(CO)₅[P(p‐tolyl)₃], ( 3 ), and Os₂(μ‐propionate)₂(CO)₅[P(p‐tolyl)₃], ( 6 ), involved the reaction of Os₃(CO)₁₂ with the appropriate carboxylic acid to initially produce Os₂(μ‐carboxylate)₂(CO)₆, followed by treatment with refluxing tetrahydrofuran (THF) to form Os₂(μ‐carboxylate)₂(CO)₅(THF), and finally addition of tri‐p‐tolylphosphane to replace the THF ligand with the P(p‐tolyl)₃ ligand. Neutral complexes of the type Os₂(μ‐O₂CR)₂(CO)₅L had not previously been subjected to X‐ray crystallographic analysis. The more symmetrical disubstituted complexes, i.e. Os₂(μ‐formate)₂(CO)₄[P(p‐tolyl)₃]₂, ( 8 ), Os₂(μ‐acetate)₂(CO)₄[P(p‐tolyl)₃]₂, ( 4 ), and Os₂(μ‐propionate)₂(CO)₄[P(p‐tolyl)₃]₂, ( 7 ), as well as the previously reported symmetrical unsubstituted complexes Os₂(μ‐acetate)₂(CO)₆, ( 2 ), and Os₂(μ‐propionate)₂(CO)₆, ( 5 ), were also prepared in order to examine the influence of axial ligand substitution on the Os—Os bond distance in these sawhorse molecules. Eight crystal structures have been determined and studied, namely μ‐acetato‐1κO:2κO′‐μ‐propanoato‐1κO:2κO′‐bis[tris(4‐methylphenyl)phosphane]‐1κP,2κP′‐bis(dicarbonylosmium)(Os—Os) dichloromethane monosolvate, [Os₂(C₂H₃O₂)(C₃H₅O₂)(C₂₁H₂₁P)₂(CO)₄]·CH₂Cl₂, ( 1 ), bis(μ‐acetato‐1κO:2κO′)bis(tricarbonylosmium)(Os—Os), [Os₂(C₂H₃O₂)₂(CO)₆], ( 2 ) (redetermined structure), bis(μ‐acetato‐1κO:2κO′)pentacarbonyl‐1κ²C,2κ³C‐[tris(4‐methylphenyl)phosphane‐1κP]diosmium(Os—Os), [Os₂(C₂H₃O₂)₂(C₂₁H₂₁P)(CO)₅], ( 3 ), bis(μ‐acetato‐1κO:2κO′)bis[tris(4‐methylphenyl)phosphane]‐1κP,2κP‐bis(dicarbonylosmium)(Os—Os) p‐xylene sesquisolvate, [Os₂(C₂H₃O₂)₂(C₂₁H₂₁P)₂(CO)₄]·1.5C₈H₁₀, ( 4 ), bis(μ‐propanoato‐1κO:2κO′)bis(tricarbonylosmium)(Os—Os), [Os₂(C₃H₅O₂)₂(CO)₆], ( 5 ), pentacarbonyl‐1κ²C,2κ³C‐bis(μ‐propanoato‐1κO:2κO′)[tris(4‐methylphenyl)phosphane‐1κP]diosmium(Os—Os), [Os₂(C₃H₅O₂)₂(C₂₁H₂₁P)(CO)₅], ( 6 ), bis(μ‐propanoato‐1κO:2κO′)bis[tris(4‐methylphenyl)phosphane]‐1κP,2κP‐bis(dicarbonylosmium)(Os—Os) dichloromethane monosolvate, [Os₂(C₃H₅O₂)₂(C₂₁H₂₁P)₂(CO)₄]·CH₂Cl₂, ( 7 ), and bis(μ‐formato‐1κO:2κO′)bis[tris(4‐methylphenyl)phosphane]‐1κP,2κP‐bis(dicarbonylosmium)(Os—Os), [Os₂(CHO₂)₂(C₂₁H₂₁P)₂(CO)₄], ( 8 ).     

Aktivierung von Schwefelkohlenstoff an Trirutheniumclustern: Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [Ru3(CO)4(μ‐PCy2)2(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)(μ3‐S){μ3‐η2‐CSC(S)S}]

Activation of Carbon Disulfide on Triruthenium Clusters: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structure Analysis of [Ru₃(CO)₄(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)(μ₃‐S){μ₃‐η²‐CSC(S)S}] [Ru₃(CO)₄(μ‐H)₃(μ‐PCy₂)₃(μ‐dppm)] ( 2 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) reacts with CS₂ at room temperature and yields the open 50 valence electron cluster [Ru₃(CO)₄(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐dppm)(μ₃‐S){μ₃‐η²‐CSC(S)S}] ( 3 ) containing the unusual μ₃‐η²‐C₂S₃ mercaptocarbyne ligand. Compound 3 was characterized by single crystal X‐ray structure analysis.     

Os3(CO)9{μ3-η1-η1-η2-η2-C(SiMe3)C(Me)C(H)C(Fc)}, the second example of a cluster with the “face” coordination of the metallacyclopentadiene fragment and its conversion to the Os3(μ-H)(CO)8{μ3-η1-η1-η4-η1-C(SiMe3)C(Me)C(H)C(C5H3FeC5H5)} complex with theortho-metallated ferrocene moiety

Os₃(μ-CO)(CO)₉(μ₃-Me₃SiC₂Me) alkyne complexes react with ferrocenylacetylene in hot benzene to form Os₃(CO)₉{μ₃-η¹-η¹-η²-η²-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(H)C(Fe)} and a small amount of the isomeric Os₃(CO)₉(μ-η¹-η¹-η⁴-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(Fc)C(H)} complex. The structure of the major isomer was confirmed by X-ray structural analysis of the single crystal. Thermolysis of this complex in refluxing benzene affords the Os₃(μ-H)(CO)₈{μ₃-η¹-η¹-η⁴-η¹-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(H)(C₅H₃FeC₅H₅)} complex with theortho-metallated ferrocene moiety. The spectral characteristics of clusters with the μ₃-η¹-η¹-η²-η² and μ-η¹-η¹-η⁴ coordinations of the metallacyclopentadiene fragment have been established, which made it possible to choose between the alternative modes of bonding of diene with the trimetallic core.     

Synthesis and characterization of triosmium and triruthenium pyrene clusters

The reaction between 1-pyrenecarboxaldehyde (C₁₆H₉CHO) and the labile triosmium cluster [Os₃(CO)₁₀(CH₃CN)₂] gives rise to the formation of two new compounds by competitive oxidative addition between the aldehydic group and an arene C-H bond, to afford the acyl complex [Os₃(CO)₁₀(μ-H)(μ-COC₁₆H₉)] (1) and the compound [Os₃(CO)₁₀(μ-H) (C₁₆H₈CHO)] (2), respectively. Thermolysis of [Os₃(CO)₁₀(μ-H)(μ-C₁₆H₉CO)] (1) in n-octane affords two new complexes in good yields, [Os₃(CO)₉(μ-H)₂(μ-COC₁₆H₈)] (3) and the pyryne complex [Os₃(CO)₉(μ-H)₂(μ₃-η¹:η¹:η²-C₁₆H₈)] (4).In contrast, when 1-pyrenecarboxaldehyde reacts with [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] only one product is obtained, [Ru₃(CO)₉(μ-H)₂(μ₃-η¹:η¹:η²-C₁₆H₈)] (5), a nonacarbonyl cluster bearing a pyrene ligand. All compounds were characterized by analytical and spectroscopic data, and crystal structures for 1, 2, 4 and 5 were obtained.     

Bridging allyl ligands upon allene insertion into electron-deficient triosmium-hydride clusters [Os3(CO)9(μ3-NSC7H3R)(μ-H)] (R = H, Me)

Allene reacts with the benzothiazolide clusters [Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃-NSC₇H₃R)(μ-H)] (R = H, Me) to afford the bridging allyl complexes [Os₃(CO)₇(μ-CO)₂(μ-NSC₇H₃R)(μ-η¹:η²:η¹-CH₂CHCH₂)] resulting from insertion of allene into the metal-hydride. Both have been crystallographically characterized and differ with respect to the relative arrangement of allyl and benzothiazolide at the triosmium centre.     

Photochemical reactions of 1-ferrocenyl-4-phenyl-1,3-butadiyne with Fe(CO)5 and CO

Photolysis of a hexane solution containing ironpentacarbonyl, 1-ferrocenyl-4-phenyl-1,3-butadiyne at low temperature yields six new products: [Fe(CO)₂{η²:η²-PhCCCC(Fc)C(CCPh)C(Fc)Fe(CO)₃}-μ-CO] (1), [Fe₂(CO)₆{μ-η¹:η¹:η²:η²-PhCCCC(Fc)-C(O)-C(Fc)CCCPh}] (2), [Fe₂(CO)₆{μ-η¹:η¹:η²:η²-FcCC(CC Ph)-C(O)-C(Fc)CCCPh}] (3), [Fe₂(CO)₆{μ-η¹:η¹:η²:η²-FcCCCC(Fc)-C(O)-C(Fc)CCCPh}] (4), [Fe(CO)₃{μ-η²: η²-[FcCC(CCPh)C(CCPh)C(Fc)}CO] (5) and [Fe(CO)₃{μ-η²: η²-[FcCC(CCPh)C(CCPh)C(Fc)}CO] (6) formed by coupling of acetylenic moieties with CO insertion on metal carbonyl support. In presence of CO, formation of another new product 2,5-bis(ferrocenyl)-3,6-bis(tetracarbonylphenylmaleoyliron)quinone (7) was observed which on further reaction with ferrocenylacetyene gave the quinone, 2,5-bis(ferrocenyl)-3,6-bis(ethynylphenyl)quinone (8). Structures of 1-5 and 8 were established crystallographically.     

Aktivierung von Schwefelkohlenstoff an Trirutheniumclustern: Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [Ru3(CO)5(μ‐H)2(μ‐PCy2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2){μ‐η2‐PCy2C(S)}(μ3‐S)] und [Ru3(CO)5(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐PCy2)2(μ3‐S)]

Activation of Carbon Disulfide on Triruthenium Clusters: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structure Analysis of [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] and [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] [Ru₃(CO)₆(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) reacts under mild conditions with CS₂ and yields by oxidative decarbonylation and insertion of CS into one phosphido bridge the opened 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐dppm){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] ( 2 ) with only two M–M bonds. The compound 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; α = 84.65(3), β = 77.21(3), γ = 81.87(3)° and V = 2790.7(11) ų. The reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₇(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂] ( 3 ) with CS₂ in refluxing toluene affords the 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] ( 4 ). The compound cristallizes in the monoclinic space group P 2₁/a with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; β = 104.223(16)° and V = 4570.9(10) ų. Although in the solid state structure one elongated Ru–Ru bond has been found the complex 4 can be considered by means of the ³¹P‐NMR data as an electron‐rich metal cluster.     

A comparative study of the reactivity of unsaturated triosmium clusters [Os3(CO)8{μ3-Ph2PCH2P(Ph)C6H4}(μ-H)] and [Os3(CO)9{μ3-η-C7H3(2-Me)NS}(μ-H)] with BuNC

Treatment of unsaturated [Os₃(CO)₈{μ₃-Ph₂PCH₂P(Ph)C₆H₄}(μ-H)] (2) with ^tBuNC at room temperature gives [Os₃(CO)₈(CNBu^t)){μ₃-Ph₂PCH₂P(Ph)C₆H₄}(μ-H)] (3) which on thermolysis in refluxing toluene furnishes [Os₃(CO)₇(CNBu^t){μ₃-Ph₂PCHP(Ph)C₆H₄}(μ-H)₂] (4). Reaction of the labile complex [Os₃(CO)₉(μ-dppm)(NCMe)] (5) with ^tBuNC at room temperature affords the substitution product [Os₃(CO)₉(μ-dppm)(CNBu^t)] (6). Thermolysis of 6 in refluxing toluene gives 4. On the other hand, the reaction of unsaturated [Os₃(CO)₉{μ₃-η²-C₇H₃(2-Me)NS}(μ-H)] (7) with ^tBuNC yields the addition product [Os₃(CO)₉(CNBu^t){μ-η²-C₇H₃(2-Me)NS}(μ-H)] (8) which on decarbonylation in refluxing toluene gives unsaturated [Os₃(CO)₈(CNBu^t){μ₃-η²-C₇H₃(2-Me)NS}(μ-H)] (9). Compound 9 reacts with PPh₃ at room temperature to give the adduct [Os₃(CO)₈(PPh₃)(CNBu^t){μ-η²-C₇H₃(2-Me)NS(μ-H)] (10). Compound 8 exists as two isomers in solution whereas 10 occurs in four isomeric forms. The molecular structures of 3, 6, 8, and 10 have been determined by X-ray diffraction studies.     

The Potential of Molybdenum Complexes Bearing Unsubstituted Heterodiatomic Group 15 Elements as Linkers in Supramolecular Chemistry

The reactions of tetrahedral molybdenum complexes bearing unsubstituted heterodiatomic Group 15 elements, [Cp₂Mo₂(CO)₄(μ,η²:η²‐PE)] (Cp=C₅H₅; E=As ( 1 ), Sb ( 2 )), with Cu^I halides afforded seven unprecedented neutral supramolecular assemblies. Depending on the Mo₂PE units and the Cu^I halide, the oligomers [?{Cp₂Mo₂(CO)₄}{μ₄,η²:η²:η²:η¹‐PE}?₄?{CuX}{Cu(μ‐X)}?₂] (E=As (X=Cl ( 3 ), Br ( 4 )); E=Sb (X=Cl ( 6 ), Br ( 7 ))) or the 1D coordination polymers [{Cp₂Mo₂(CO)₄}{μ₄,η²:η²:η¹:η¹‐PAs}{Cu(μ‐I)}]_n ( 5 ) and [{Cp₂Mo₂(CO)₄}{μ₄,η²:η²:η²:η¹‐PSb}₂{Cu(μ‐X)}₃]_n (X=I ( 8 ), Br ( 9 )) are accessible. These solid‐state aggregates are the first and only examples featuring the organometallic heterodiatomic Mo₂PE complexes 1 and 2 as linking moieties. DFT calculations demonstrate that complexes 1 and 2 present a unique class of mixed‐donor ligands coordinating to Cu^I centers via the P lone pair and the P?E σ‐bond, revealing an unprecedented coordination mode.     

Reactivity of triosmium clusters with 3,4-dimethyl-1-phenylphosphole and cyanoethyldi-tert-butylphosphine ligands: X-ray crystal structures of [Os3(CO)9(μ-OH)(μ-H)(η1-PhPC4H2Me2)] and [Os3(CO)11(η1- t Bu2PC2H4CN)]

Reaction of [Os₃(μ-H)₂(CO)₁₀] with 3,4-dimethyl-1-phenylphosphole in refluxing cyclohexane affords two substituted triosmium clusters: [Os₃(CO)₉(μ-H)(μ³:η¹:η¹:η²-PhPC₄H₃Me₂)] (1) and [Os₃(CO)₉(H)(μ²-η¹:η²-PhPC₄H₄Me₂)] (2), of which cluster 2 exhibits two chromatographically non-separable isomeric forms attributed to terminal and bridging coordination of the hydride ligand, respectively. When this reaction is performed in refluxing THF, the only product is the cluster [Os₃(CO)₉(μ-OH)(μ-H)(η¹-PhPC₄H₂Me₂)] (3). Crystallographic information obtained for cluster 3 shows the phosphole ligand occupying an equatorial position, as expected, while the OH group is asymmetrically bridging unlike previously reported similar compounds. Additionally, interaction of the labile cluster [Os₃(CO)₁₁(CH₃CN)] with cyanoethyldi-tert-butylphosphine in dichloromethane at room temperature was found to give [Os₃(CO)₁₁(η¹- ^t Bu₂PC₂H₄CN)] (4) as the only product; its crystallographic characterization shows that the phosphine ligand coordinates by means of the phosphorus atom in an equatorial fashion, analogous to compound 3.     

Binuclear CpV,Cp*V,and Cp*Ta Complexes containing Organochalcogenolato Bridges, μ‐ER (E = Sulfur,Selenium, Tellurium; R = Methyl,Phenyl, and Ferrocenyl)

Photolysis of the halfsandwich tetracarbonylmetal complexes CpV(CO)₄, Cp*V(CO)₄ and Cp*Ta(CO)₄ in solution in the presence of di(organyl)dichalcogenides E₂R₂ (E = S, Se, Te; R = Me, Ph, Fc) leads to diamagnetic doubly organochalcogenolato‐bridged compounds, [Cp⁽⁾M(CO)₂(μ‐ER)]₂. According to the X‐ray structure determinations carried out for [CpV(CO)₂(μ‐TeMe)]₂, [Cp*V(CO)₂(μ‐TePh)]₂ and [Cp*Ta(CO)₂(μ‐SPh)]₂, the molecular framework consists of a folded M₂(μ‐ER)₂ ring with the cyclopentadienyl ligands in cis‐configuration and the organyl substituents R in a syn‐equatorial arrangement, thus forming a bowl‐shaped molecule with the four terminal CO ligands protruding into the inner sphere. The M…M distances (in the range between 305 and 330 pm) are not considered to indicate direct bonding interactions. The vanadium complexes [Cp⁽⁾V(CO)₂(μ‐ER)]₂ are completely decarbonylated in the presence of an excess of E₂R₂ in boiling toluene, and in many cases the paramagnetic quadruply‐bridged products, [CpV(μ‐ER)₂]₂, can be isolated.     

Cage Opening of a Carborane Ligand by Metal Cluster Complexes

The reaction of Os₃(CO)₁₀(NCMe)₂ with closo‐o‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀ has yielded two interconvertible isomers Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃‐4,5,9‐C₂B₁₀H₈)(μ‐H)₂ ( 1 a ) and Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃‐3,4,8‐C₂B₁₀H₈)(μ‐H)₂ ( 1 b ) formed by the loss of the two NCMe ligands and one CO ligand from the Os₃ cluster. Two BH bonds of the o‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀ were activated in its addition to the osmium cluster. A second triosmium cluster was added to the 1 a / 1 b mixture to yield the complex Os₃(CO)₉(μ‐H)₂(μ₃‐4,5,9‐μ₃‐7,11,12‐C₂B₁₀H₇)Os₃(CO)₉(μ‐H)₃ ( 2 ) that contains two triosmium triangles attached to the same carborane cage. When heated, 2 was transformed to the complex Os₃(CO)₉(μ‐H)(μ₃‐3,4,8‐μ₃‐7,11,12‐C₂B₁₀H₈)Os₃(CO)₉(μ‐H) ( 3 ) by a novel opening of the carborane cage with loss of H₂.     

From Metallaborane to Borylene Complexes: Syntheses and Structures of Triply Bridged Ruthenium and Tantalum Borylene Complexes

Reaction of [1,2‐(Cp*RuH)₂B₃H₇] ( 1 ; Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) with [Mo(CO)₃(CH₃CN)₃] yielded arachno‐[(Cp*RuCO)₂B₂H₆] ( 2 ), which exhibits a butterfly structure, reminiscent of 7 sep B₄H₁₀. Compound 2 was found to be a very good precursor for the generation of bridged borylene species. Mild pyrolysis of 2 with [Fe₂(CO)₉] yielded a triply bridged heterotrinuclear borylene complex [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO){Fe(CO)₃}] ( 3 ) and bis‐borylene complexes [{(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Ru)(μ‐CO)}₂Fe₂(CO)₅] ( 4 ) and [{(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Ru)Fe(CO)₃}₂(μ‐CO)] ( 5 ). In a similar fashion, pyrolysis of 2 with [Mn₂(CO)₁₀] permits the isolation of μ₃‐borylene complex [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐CO){Mn(CO)₃}] ( 6 ). Both compounds 3 and 6 have a trigonal‐pyramidal geometry with the μ₃‐BH ligand occupying the apical vertex, whereas 4 and 5 can be viewed as bicapped tetrahedra, with two μ₃‐borylene ligands occupying the capping position. The synthesis of tantalum borylene complex [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*TaCO)₂(μ‐CO){Fe(CO)₃}] ( 7 ) was achieved by the reaction of [(Cp*Ta)₂B₄H₈(μ‐BH₄)] at ambient temperature with [Fe₂(CO)₉]. Compounds 2 – 7 have been isolated in modest yield as yellow to red crystalline solids. All the new compounds have been characterized in solution by mass spectrometry; IR spectroscopy; and ¹H, ¹¹B, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and the structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of 2 – 6 .     

Heterometallic Triply‐Bridging Bis‐Borylene Complexes

Triply‐bridging bis‐{hydrido(borylene)} and bis‐borylene species of groups 6, 8 and 9 transition metals are reported. Mild thermolysis of [Fe₂(CO)₉] with an in situ produced intermediate, generated from the low‐temperature reaction of [Cp*WCl₄] (Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) and [LiBH₄?THF] afforded triply‐bridging bis‐{hydrido(borylene)}, [(μ₃‐BH)₂H₂{Cp*W(CO)₂}₂{Fe(CO)₂}] ( 1 ) and bis‐borylene, [(μ₃‐BH)₂{Cp*W(CO)₂}₂{Fe(CO)₃}] ( 2 ). The chemical bonding analyses of 1 show that the B?H interactions in bis‐{hydrido (borylene)} species is stronger as compared to the M?H ones. Frontier molecular orbital analysis shows a significantly larger energy gap between the HOMO‐LUMO for 2 as compared to 1 . In an attempt to synthesize the ruthenium analogue of 1 , a similar reaction has been performed with [Ru₃(CO)₁₂]. Although we failed to get the bis‐{hydrido(borylene)} species, the reaction afforded triply‐bridging bis‐borylene species [(μ₃‐BH)₂{WCp*(CO)₂}₂{Ru(CO)₃}] ( 2′ ), an analogue of 2 . In search for the isolation of bridging bis‐borylene species of Rh, we have treated [Co₂(CO)₈] with nido‐[(RhCp*)₂(B₃H₇)], which afforded triply‐bridging bis‐borylene species [(μ₃‐BH)₂(RhCp*)₂Co₂(CO)₄(μ‐CO)] ( 3 ). All the compounds have been characterized by means of single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction study; ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C NMR spectroscopy; IR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry.     

Reaction of tri(2-furyl)phosphine with triosmium clusters: C-H and P-C activation to afford furyne and phosphinidene ligands

Addition of tri(2-furyl)phosphine, PFu₃, to [Os₃(CO)₁₀(μ-H)₂] at room temperature gives [HOs₃(CO)₁₀(PFu₃)(μ-H)] (1), while in refluxing toluene the same reactants afford [Os₃(CO)₉{μ₃-PFu₂(C₄H₂O)}(μ-H)] (2) resulting from orthometallatation of a furyl ring. Reaction of PFu₃ with [Os₃(CO)_10−n(NCMe)_n] (n = 0, 1, 2) affords the substituted clusters [Os₃(CO)_12−n(PFu₃)_n] (n = 1-3) (3-5), the phosphine ligands occupying equatorial position in all cases. Heating [Os₃(CO)₁₁(PFu₃)] (3) in refluxing octane gives [Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃-PFu)(μ₃-η²-C₄H₂O)] (6) which results from both carbon-hydrogen and carbon-phosphorus bond activation and contains both μ₃-η²-furyne and furylphosphinidene ligands. All new clusters have been characterized by spectroscopic methods together with single crystal X-ray diffraction for 2, 3 and 6.     

Hydrophilic Quaternary Ammonium‐Group‐Containing [FeFe]‐Hydrogenase Models: Synthesis,Structures, and Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Production

The first quaternary ammonium‐group‐containing [FeFe]‐hydrogenase models [(μ‐PDT)Fe₂(CO)₄{κ²‐(Ph₂P)₂N(CH₂)₂NMe₂BzBr}] ( 2 ; PDT=propanedithiolate) and [(μ‐PDT)Fe₂(CO)₄{μ‐(Ph₂P)₂N(CH₂)₂NMe₂BzBr}] ( 4 ) have been prepared by the quaternization of their precursors [(μ‐PDT)Fe₂(CO)₄{κ²‐(Ph₂P)₂N(CH₂)₂NMe₂}] ( 1 ) and [(μ‐PDT)Fe₂(CO)₄{μ‐(Ph₂P)₂N(CH₂)₂NMe₂}] ( 3 ) with benzyl bromide in high yields. Although new complexes 1 – 4 have been fully characterized by spectroscopic and X‐ray crystallographic studies, the chelated complexes 1 and 2 converted into their bridged isomers 3 and 4 at higher temperatures, thus demonstrating that these bridged isomers are thermodynamically favorable. An electrochemical study on hydrophilic models 2 and 4 in MeCN and MeCN/H₂O as solvents indicates that the reduction potentials are shifted to less‐negative potentials as the water content increases. This outcome implies that both 2 and 4 are more easily reduced in the mixed MeCN/H₂O solvent than in MeCN. In addition, hydrophilic models 2 and 4 act as electrocatalysts and achieve higher i_cat/i_p values and turnover numbers (TONs) in MeCN/H₂O as a solvent than in MeCN for the production of hydrogen from the weak acid HOAc.     

Formation of Alkyne Bridged Multicobalt Carbonyl Complexes with Tris(2‐Thienyl)Phosphine or Bis(Trimethylsilylethynyl)Phenylphosphine Ligand

Treatment of Co₄(CO)₁₂ with an excess of trimethylsilylacetylene (TMSA) in the presence of tri(2‐thienyl)phosphine in THF at 25 °C for 2 hours yielded six compounds. Two pseudo‐octahedral, alkyne‐bridged tetracobalt clusters, [Co₄(μ₄‐η²‐HC≡CSiMe₃)(CO)₁₀(μ‐CO)₂] ( 4 ) and [Co₄(μ₄‐η²‐HC≡CSiMe³)‐(CO)₉(μ‐CO)₂{P(C₄H₄S)₃}] ( 6 ), along with an alkyne‐bridged dicobalt complex, [Co₂(CO)₅(μ‐HC≡CSiMe₃)‐{P(C₄H₄S)₃}] ( 5 ), were obtained as new compounds. The addition of the thienylphosphine ligand, in fact, facilitates the reaction rate. Reaction of an alkyne‐bridged dicobalt complex, [(η²‐H‐C≡C‐SiMe₃)Co₂(CO)₆] ( 3 ), with a bi‐functional ligand, PPh(‐C≡C‐SiMe₃)₂, yielded an unexpected six‐membered, cyclic compound, {(Ph)(Me₃Si‐C≡C)P‐[(η²‐C≡C‐SiMe₃)Co₂(CO)₅]}₂ ( 7 ). All of these new compounds were characterized by spectroscopic means; the solid‐state structures of ( 5 ), ( 6 ) and ( 7 ) have been established by X‐ray crystallography.     

The cleavage of a coordinated SCNR group in [Fe(CO)2L2(η2-SCNR)] by [Co(η-C5H5)(PPh3)2] to give complexes containing μ3-CNR ligand. The preparation and structure of [{Co(η-C5H5)}2{Fe(CO)2(PPh3)}(μ3-S){μ3-CNC(O)C6H5}]

The reaction of [Fe(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂{η²-SCNC(O)Ph}] with [Co(η-C₅H₅)(PPh₃)₂] in benzene solution at room temperature results in the facile cleavage of the CS bond of the SCNC(O)Ph ligand to give [{Co(η-C₅H₅)}₂{Fe(CO)₂(PPh₃)}(μ₃-S{μ₃-CNC(O)Ph}], whereas [Fe(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂(η²-SCNMe)] gives [{Co(η-C₅H₅)} ₂₂{Fe(CO)(CNMe)(PPh₃)(μ₃-S)(μ₃-CO)]. The structure of [{Co(η-C₅H₅)}₂{Fe(CO)₂(PPh₃)} (μ₃-CNC(O)Ph}] has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction.