Trace analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in suspended particulate matter by accelerated solvent extraction followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

An analytical procedure based on extraction by accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis has been developed for the determination of particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from large-volume water samples (20 L). The effect of temperature and number of cycles on the efficiency of ASE was investigated: the best results were obtained by using a temperature of 100°C and one static cycle. A mixture of hexane/acetone 1:1 (v/v) was used as extraction solvent. Mean total method recovery under optimized conditions was 85%. The developed methodology was applied to the analysis of suspended particulate matter from Lake Maggiore waters (north of Italy). Mean PAH concentrations in suspended particulate matter from Lake Maggiore ranged from 0.2 ng L⁻¹ for anthracene to 18.7 ng L⁻¹ for naphthalene.     

Determination of synthetic musks in the sediment of the Taihu lake by using accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and GC/MS

Synthetic musks, substitutes for natural musks, are widely distributed in environment. They have been detected in water, sludge, fish, shrimp, mussels and other aquatic animals, and even in human's adipose tissue, blood and breast milk. In this study, a new extraction procedure, based on the accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and in cell clean-up technique was developed and successfully coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) for the analysis of musks in sediment samples. With this method, the limits of detection as low as 0.03–0.05?ng?g^?1 and the recovery rate of 86.0%–104% are achieved. When compared with soxhlet extraction (SE) and ultrasonic extraction (USE), ASE not only has the best extraction efficiency but also has advantage in extraction time and solvent consumption. Eight synthetic musks, including six polycyclic musks (Tonalide (AHTN), Galaxolide (HHCB), Phantolide (AHDI), Traseolide (ATII), Cashmeran (DPMI) and Celestolide (ADBI)) and two nitro musks (musk xylene (MX) and musk ketone (MK)), were evaluated in sediment samples collected from 15 selected locations of the Taihu lake, one of the largest freshwater lakes in China. The contents of synthetic musks in sediment samples range from 0.336 to 3.10?ng?g^?1 for HHCB, 0.184 to 1.21?ng?g^?1 for AHTN, below detection limit (BDL) to 0.349?ng?g^?1 for MX, and BDL to 0.0786?ng?g^?1 for MK. The contents of DPMI, ADBI, AHMI and ATII are below detection limit in all samples. The results reflect current status of fragrance compound pollution in this area, and provide basic data for environmental policy making.     

Determination of acetanilide herbicides in cereal crops using accelerated solvent extraction, solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-electron capture detector

A method was developed to determine eight acetanilide herbicides from cereal crops based on accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by gas chromatography-electron capture detector (GC-ECD) analysis. During the ASE process, the effect of four parameters (temperature, static time, static cycles and solvent) on the extraction efficiency was considered and compared with shake-flask extraction method. After extraction with ASE, four SPE tubes (graphitic carbon black/primary secondary amine (GCB/PSA), GCB, Florisil and alumina-N) were assayed for comparison to obtain the best clean-up efficiency. The results show that GCB/PSA cartridge gave the best recoveries and cleanest chromatograms. The analytical process was validated by the analysis of spiked blank samples. Performance characteristics such as linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitation (LOQ), precision and recovery were studied. At 0.05 mg/kg spiked level, recoveries and precision values for rice, wheat and maize were 82.3-115.8 and 1.1-13.6%, respectively. For all the herbicides, LOD and LOQ ranged from 0.8 to 1.7 μg/kg and from 2.4 to 5.3 μg/kg, respectively. The proposed analytical methodology was applied for the analysis of the targets in samples; only three herbicides, propyzamid, metolachlor and diflufenican, were detected in two samples.     

Solid-phase extraction clean-up procedure for the analysis of PAHs in lichens

A clean-up procedure based on a solid-phase extraction column was optimized for determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in lichen extracts to remove co-extracted compounds from the matrix in the final extract. Several kinds of solid phases were evaluated: normal phase (-NH₂ and alumina), strong anion exchange and reversed phase. The -NH₂ columns were the most effective by using a packed solid bed of 500?mg. The lichen raw extract was loaded on the column previously conditioned with dichloromethane and hexane. Hexane (0.5?mL) was used as rinsing solvent, and PAHs were quantitatively eluted (80–97%) using 2?mL of hexane–dichloromethane (65–35) as eluting solvent. In these conditions, even the heaviest PAHs were quantitatively eluted. The optimized SPE method provides a short time and low-solvent-consumption sample clean-up compared with other conventional methods based on column chromatography. The analytical procedure, dynamic sonication-assisted extraction, followed by the optimized solid-phase extraction clean-up, was used to determine the 16 EPA priority PAHs from native lichens collected from the Aragon valley in central Pyrenees. The PAH concentrations in lichen samples ranged from 352 to 1654?ng?g^?1, and the minimum concentration value was established as the regional reference PAH levels in the area.     

Statistical tools for the optimization of a highly reproducible method for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sludge samples

The aim of this study is to develop and optimize an analytical method for the determination of 14 priority PAHs in sludge samples based on Accelerated Solvent Extraction (ASE) coupled to RP-HPLC/fluorescence detection. Statistical tools were used to demonstrate the influence of the parameters during the optimization steps. The final parameters were selected to provide analytical errors statistically as low as possible. First, couples of excitation/emission detection wavelengths were tested, and some were finally selected to provide errors lower than 2%. It was then demonstrated that PAH extraction efficiencies are not statistically influenced by the ASE parameters. It was also found that the ASE extraction from sludge samples provides statistically similar results to those obtained with traditional Soxhlet extraction, but with a lower reproducibility error. After optimization, the accuracy of the method was validated with a certified sludge. In conclusion, an optimized analytical procedure has been proposed to monitor PAHs during lab-scale experiments requiring highly repeatable and accurate results from a low sample volume contaminated by PAHs at trace levels.     

Application of accelerated solvent extraction to the investigation of saikosaponins from the roots of Bupleurum falcatum

Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) was applied to the extraction of saikosaponin a, saikosaponin c and saikosaponin d from the roots of Bupleurum falcatum. Main extraction parameters such as the extraction solvents, extraction temperature and static extraction time were investigated and optimized. The optimized procedure employed 70% methanol as extraction solvent, 120°C of extraction temperature, 10 min of static extraction time, 60% of flush volume and the extraction recoveries of the three compounds were near to 100% with one extraction cycle. The extracted samples were analyzed by HPLC with UV detector. The HPLC conditions were as follows: Hypersil ODS2 (4.6 mm×250 mm, 5 μm) column, acetonitrile and water as mobile phase, flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, UV detection wavelength of 204 nm and injection volume of 20 μL. Compared with the traditional methods including heat‐reflux extraction and ultrasonic‐assisted extraction, the proposed ASE method was more efficient and faster to be operated. The results indicated that ASE was an alternative method for extracting saikosaponins from the roots of B. falcatum.     

Determination of Atmospheric Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Using Accelerated Solvent Extraction

Abstract

An accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) method has been developed for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) present in both atmospheric particulate and gaseous phases in this study. Extraction parameters such as the combination of solvents, extraction temperature, and static extraction time were investigated and optimized. Effective extraction was achieved using a 3:1 mixture of n-hexane and acetone as extraction solvents at 100°C in 30 min for all the compounds studied. The optimized extraction method was compared with conventional extraction methods and validated using National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)–certified standard reference material (SRM) 1649a. The recoveries obtained for certified 12 PAHs were in the range of 82–126% with relative standard deviation (RSD) between 6 and 28%. The validated ASE technique was used followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for the determination of PAHs distributed between gaseous and particulate phases in the atmosphere of Singapore. Total average concentrations of PAHs in air samples were 33.54 ± 19.32 ng m^?3, with 4.72 ± 2.80 ng m^?3 in particulate phase and 28.82 ± 16.92 ng m^?3 in gaseous phase, respectively. The results obtained from this study are compared to those reported from other areas of the world.     

加速溶剂萃取法快速提取黄连中的生物碱

探讨了快速溶剂萃取法（ASE）提取黄连中生物碱的可行性,并比较了该方法与回流提取法和超声提取法的优越性。以黄连中盐酸小檗碱的提取率为指标,以高效液相色谱法（HPLC）为检测方法,用正交实验对快速溶剂萃取法从黄连中提取盐酸小檗碱的工作条件进行优化。最佳仪器参数：提取溶剂为80%乙醇＋0.5%HCl,提取温度为130℃,静态提取时间为10 min,提取次数为1次。快速溶剂萃取法可作为黄连中生物碱分析测定的前处理方法。     

加速溶剂萃取-气相色谱质谱法测定太子参中酰胺类除草剂的含量

建立了太子参中乙草胺、丁草胺和S-异丙甲草胺的加速溶剂萃取-气相色谱/质谱测定的分析方法。对提取溶剂、萃取温度、净化材料、不同冲洗体积和静态萃取时间、循环次数等实验条件进行了优化。用HP-5MS弹性石英毛细管柱经柱程序升温技术分离,并用质谱检测器检测,内标法计算含量。本方法测定太子参中乙草胺、丁草胺和S-异丙甲草胺的检出限分别为0.16 ng/g、0.18 ng/g和0.05 ng/g,精密度分别为2.6%、3.9%和3.1%,回收率为80.2%-104.1%。所测样品不含上述3种除草剂残留。本方法简便、干扰小、检测效果好,可用于太子参药材中此类除草剂残留的分析。     

Analysis of Cembranoids in Flue‐cured Tobacco by Accelerated Solvent Extraction and Gas Chromatography‐Mass Spectrometry‐Selected Ion Monitoring

An efficient and sensitive analytical method based on accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry‐selected ion monitoring (GC‐MS‐SIM) was developed and validated for analysis of cembranoids in flue‐cured tobacco leaves. Extraction efficiency of different pretreatment methods including liquid‐solid extraction (LSE), ultrasound‐assisted extraction (UAE), Soxlet extraction and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) was compared and ASE was chosen as the optimal extraction method. During ASE procedure, effect of four parameters on extraction efficiency was considered and the experimental conditions were selected as follows: extraction solvent: dichloromethane; oven temperature: 50 °C; static time: 5 min and number of cycles: 2. Working standards of cembranoids were isolated by silica gel column chromatography and the identification was performed by mass spectrometry. Performance characteristics such as linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitation (LOQ), precision and recovery were studied. The LOD and LOQ values were ranging from 5.0 × 10^?3 to 6.9 × 10^?3 μg/mL and 1.7 × 10^?2 to 2.3 × 10^?2 μg/mL for all analytes. At three different spiked levels, recoveries for CBT‐ol, α‐CBT‐diol and β‐CBT‐diol were 94.6%‐105.1%, 93.0%‐97.2% and 88.7%‐107.5% while the relative standard deviations (RSDs) were in the ranges of 3.9%‐6.2%, 1.8%‐8.7% and 1.7%‐6.0%, respectively. The proposed analytical methodology was successfully applied in the analysis of cembranoids in tobacco samples.     

ASE-SPE/GC-MS测定土壤中16种PAHs质量控制研究

优化了土壤中16种优控多环芳烃( PAHs)的分析方法,建立了一套完备的质量控制体系,解决了PAHs分析中常见的技术难点,如苯并(a)芘(BaP)回收率低,基质复杂的样品净化效果不理想,萘(Nap)和菲(Phe)挥发损失和环境本底影响等.样品经加速溶剂提取(ASE),固相萃取(SPE)净化,逐级减压浓缩,气相色谱质谱( GC - MS)测定,并以氘代苯并a芘(BaP - d12)作回收率指示物.实验比较了3种正相SPE吸附剂的效果,发现弗罗里硅土对BaP存在明显的降解现象,BaP的定量应使用同位素稀释法,以降低其分析不确定度;氧化铝对PAHs的吸附性过强,不利于样品净化;硅胶最为理想.PAHs的仪器检出限为0.26～5.7 pg,方法检出限为0.067 ～0.97 ng/g(干重),土壤基质加标回收率为71％～ 122％,相对标准偏差为1.6％～8.3％.将该法用于7个电子废物焚烧区域农田土壤样品的测定,PAHs含量在28～ 283 ng/g(干重)之间,样品中BaP-d12的回收率为90％～124％,各项质控指标符合检测要求.     

Diesel-Range Organics Extraction and Determination in Environmental Samples by Gas Chromatography‒Mass Spectrometry: Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction vs. Solvent Extraction

An accurate and sensitive analytical method for the determination of diesel-range organics (DRO) is the basis to monitoring and soil remediation studies. In the present work, the determination of DRO in different water and soil samples was optimized. Solvent extraction procedures, i.e. ultrasonic assisted extraction (USAE) (for water samples) and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) (for soil samples), and a solvent-free procedure, headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME), were optimized to achieve the highest recoveries for the simultaneous determination of all DRO. One hour of USAE for water samples and ASE of soil samples at 100°C, 2000 psi and two extraction cycles lead to analytical recoveries of 70?100%. Using HS-SPME, 30 min of incubation at 90°C were sufficient to achieve analytical recoveries up to 90% for water and soil samples. HS-SPME enables higher preconcentration factors, which makes this method more appropriate for samples with trace DRO concentrations.     

Accelerated solvent extraction then liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry for determination of 4-t-octylphenol, 4-nonylphenols, and bisphenol A in fish liver

Summary Analysis of extracts from fish liver containing alkylphenol contaminants can be hindered by the presence of co-extracted fats and proteins that interfere with chromatographic analysis. In this study accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), Florisil clean-up, then combined liquid chromatography—mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with an electrospray (ESI) interface have been used to optimize an analytical procedure for the analysis of octylphenol, nonylphenol, and bisphenol A in fish liver. After comparison of the efficiency of ASE with conventional Soxhlet extraction the developed procedure was applied to the analysis of liver samples. Calibration plots of the relationship between concentration and the ratio of the responses to the analyte and to the internal standard, 4-n-nonylphenol, were determined by linear regression analysis over the concentration range 0.05 to 10 ppm and resulted in good fits (r ²>0.994). Recoveries (evaluated for each liver sample as the ratio between response to the surrogate compound, 4-n-nonylphenol, and that to the internal standard, 4-n-heptylphenol, relative to the same ratio for a reference standard solution) were 53±20%. Under the experimental conditions used in this work the limits of detection (LOD), calculated by use of a signal-to-noise ratio of 3∶1, were 5 ng g⁻¹ for 4-t-octylphenol, 15 ng g⁻¹ for bisphenol A, and 20 ng g⁻¹ for nonylphenol. The method can be satisfactorily applied to screening analysis of octyl-and nonylphenols and bisphenol A in biological samples such as fish liver.     

Ultrasonication extraction coupled with magnetic solid-phase clean-up for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils by high-performance liquid chromatography

C18-functionalized magnetic microspheres synthesized in a three-stage system and characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and SEM were applied for clean-up and enrichment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil samples combined with ultrasonication extraction. Magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) parameters, such as elution solvents, amounts of sorbents, enrichment time and organic modifier, were optimized together with ultrasonication time and extraction solvents. Under the optimal conditions, the developed method provided spiked recoveries of 63.2-92.8% with RSDs of less than 6.4% and limits of detection were 0.5-1.0 ng/g. This new method provides several advantages, such as high extraction efficiency, convenient extraction procedure and short analysis times. Finally, the method was successfully applied to the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil samples.     

Comparative performance of extraction strategies for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in peats

The assessment of historical trends in atmospheric deposition of organic contaminants by using peat samples has been reported on several occasions because these samples represent an almost ideal medium for recording temporal changes in organic contaminant deposition rates. The determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in peat samples is complicated due to the high content of organic matter in peat, which affects both extraction efficiency and analytical quality. A rapid and simple method is proposed for the determination of 10 US Environmental Protection Agency indicator PAHs in complex matrices such as peat. This article reviews and addresses the most relevant analytical methods for determining PAHs in peat. We discuss and critically evaluate three different extraction procedures, such as ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction (UASE), shaking and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE). Clean-up of extracts was performed by solid-phase extraction using silica cartridges. Detection of the selected PAHs was carried out by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescence detection for determination. Optimization of the variables affecting extraction by the selected extraction techniques was conducted, concluding that the UASE extraction method using hexane:dichloromethane (80:20) as extractant was robust enough to determine the selected PAHs in peat samples with estimated quantification limits between 0.050 and 3.5 μg/kg depending on the PAH. UASE did not demand sophisticated equipment and long extraction times. PLE involved sophisticated equipment and showed important variations in the results. The method proposed was applied to the determination of PAHs in peat samples from Xistral Mountains (Galicia, Spain).     

Comparison of different extraction techniques for the determination of chlorinated pesticides in animal feed

The performances of Soxhlet extraction, dive-in Soxhlet extraction, microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), fluidized-bed extraction (FBE), and ultrasonic extraction (UE) for the analysis of organochlorine pesticides in animal feed have been investigated. ASE and MAE provided significantly better extraction efficiency than Soxhlet extraction. The concentrations were 126.7 and 114.8%, respectively, of the values obtained by classical Soxhlet extraction, whereas the results from FBE and dive-in Soxhlet were comparable with those from the standard Soxhlet procedure. The reproducibility of FBE was the best, with RSDs ranging from 0.3 to 3.9%. Under the investigated operation conditions UE was not efficient, with the recoveries of target compounds being about 50% less than Soxhlet. Additionally, the performances of Soxhlet, dive-in Soxhlet, MAE, ASE and FBE were validated by determination of the certified reference material BCR-115. The results from the extraction techniques were in good agreement with the certified values.     

Extraction and analysis of pharmaceuticals in polluted sediment using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

A multi-residue method for the extraction and clean-up of sediment samples was developed for the analysis of pharmaceutical residues. Sediment samples were collected in the proximity of sewage water plant in Stockholm, Sweden. Target analytes were the basic β-blocker propranolol, the neutral neuroleptic carbamazepine and the acidic anticoagulant warfarin, the painkiller diclofenac and the lipid regulator gemfibrozil. The extraction solvent was optimised with regard to pH and organic modifer. Extraction and clean up were performed with liquid-liquid extraction and ultra-sonication followed by solid-phase extraction. One extraction solvent, containing acetone/McIlvaine buffer pH4, provided satisfactory extraction for all substances. LC/MSMS in the MRM mode was used for determination. The recoveries of the extraction and clean-up steps were 60–75% (±2–8%) and LOQs were in the range 0.4–8?ng/g sediment (dry weight). The pharmaceuticals found in the sediment samples were propranolol and carbamazepine, representing substances with basic and neutral properties. Additionally, the samples were analysed with LC/QTOF for verification with the use of accurate mass measurement in the full-scan mode. Pharmaceuticals not represented in the original method were looked for. Non-target pharmaceuticals found using the LC/QTOF system were the basic β-blocker metoprolol and the acidic painkiller naproxen.     

Simultaneous determination of pyrethroid,organophosphate, and organochlorine pesticides in fish tissue using tandem solid-phase extraction clean-up

A method was developed for the simultaneous analysis of pyrethroid, organophosphate, and organochlorine pesticides in fish tissue. Different extraction solvents and solid-phase extraction clean-up procedures were tested. The best approach was to extract by sonication with acetonitrile and 10%?methanol, followed by clean-up of extracts using C₁₈, Florisil and Na₂SO₄ tandem solid-phase extraction cartridges. Gas chromatography with an electron-capture detector was used for analyte determination. All 26 target pesticides were detected using the new method in a single analytical run. The method detection limits ranged from 0.13 to 1.40?µg/kg, while recoveries of the analytes ranged from 86.1 to 133.8%?with relative standard deviations?≤12.1%?at a spiked concentration of 5?µg/kg. The method was developed to assess possible pesticide contamination in fish collected from lakes at a proposed Illinois National Guard Armory site.     

Interfacing ASE and HPLC for the Determination of PAH in Soil

A method was developed to couple an accelerated solvent extraction system (ASE) with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for the analysis of PAH in soil samples. The resolution of HPLC is well maintained while the advantages of ASE, fast extraction, less solvent consumption and ease of operation, are well expressed. The precision and accuracy of this method are verified by a series of analyses of reference material, and the precision of retention from multiple injection indicates minimum loss of chromatographic resolution by the interface of this technique. Detection limits for the studied PAH range from 0.07 ng/Kg to 0.21 ng/Kg with a fluorescence detector.     

A Simple Extraction Method for Determination of High Molecular Weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediments by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

A simplified extraction method was developed for extracting high molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from river sediments. The samples were extracted 3 times with 5 mL of solvent (toluene:methanol, 9 : 1, v/v) at 100 °C, 10 minutes for each extraction. After clean‐up and concentration, extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometer (GC‐MS). The extraction efficiency and accuracy was evaluated by the standard reference material (SRM‐1941b). Comparing to certified values, the average recoveries of high molecular weight PAHs with 3, 4, 5 and 6 fused benzene rings were 72.9∼113.2 % (R.S.D. 2.3∼6.3 %) except those of dibenz[a,h]anthracene (206.2±4.6 %). The average recoveries for PAHs spiked sediment samples were comparable with accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and Soxhlet methods. The simple extraction method consumes less solvent, fewer amount of sample than those of conventional methods. The lowest quantitation limit of PAHs is 1.1 μg/kg.