Step by step. The benefits of stage-based R&D licensing contracts

We examine how a licensor can optimally design licensing contracts for multi-phase R&D projects when he does not know the licensee’s project valuation, leading to adverse selection, and cannot enforce the licensee’s effort level, resulting in moral hazard. We focus on the effect of the phased nature typical of such projects, and compare single-phase and multi-phase contracts. We determine the optimal values for the upfront payment, milestone payments and royalties, and the optimal timing for outlicensing. Including multiple milestones and accompanying payments can be an effective way of discriminating between licensees holding different valuations, without having to manipulate the royalty rate, which induces licensees to invest less, resulting in lower project values and socially suboptimal solutions. Interestingly, we also find that multiple milestone payments are beneficial even when the licensor is risk-averse, contrary to standard contract theory results, which recommend that only an upfront payment should be used. In terms of licensing timing, we show that the optimal time depends on the licensor’s risk aversion, the characteristics of the licensee and the project value.     

Optimal decision indices for R&D project evaluation in the pharmaceutical industry: Pearson index versus Gittins index

This paper examines issues related to various decision-based analytic approaches to sequential choice of projects, with special motivation from and application in the pharmaceutical industry. In particular, the Pearson index and Gittins index are considered as key strategic decision-making tools for the selection of R&D projects. It presents a proof of optimality of the Pearson index based on the Neyman–Pearson lemma. Emphasis is also given to how a project manager may differentiate between the two indices based on concepts from statistical decision theory. This work demonstrates and justifies the correct use of the Pearson index.     

A multiobjective evolutionary approach for linearly constrained project selection under uncertainty

In the project selection problem a decision maker is required to allocate limited resources among an available set of competing projects. These projects could arise, although not exclusively, in an R&D, information technology or capital budgeting context. We propose an evolutionary method for project selection problems with partially funded projects, multiple (stochastic) objectives, project interdependencies (in the objectives), and a linear structure for resource constraints. The method is based on posterior articulation of preferences and is able to approximate the efficient frontier composed of stochastically nondominated solutions. We compared the method with the stochastic parameter space investigation method (PSI) and illustrate it by means of an R&D portfolio problem under uncertainty based on Monte Carlo simulation.     

Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: A DEA based methodology

We propose and demonstrate a methodology for the construction and analysis of efficient, effective and balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions. The methodology is based on an extended data envelopment analysis (DEA) model that quantifies some the qualitative concepts embedded in the balanced scorecard (BSC) approach. The methodology includes a resource allocation scheme, an evaluation of individual projects, screening of projects based on their relative values and on portfolio requirements, and finally a construction and evaluation of portfolios. The DEA–BSC model is employed in two versions, first to evaluate individual R&D projects, and then to evaluate alternative R&D portfolios. To generate portfolio alternatives, we apply a branch-and-bound algorithm, and use an accumulation function that accounts for possible interactions among projects. The entire methodology is illustrated via an example in the context of a governmental agency charged with selecting technological projects.     

The impact of delaying an investment decision on R&D projects in real option game

In a research and development (R&D) investment, the cost and the project value of such an investment are usually uncertain, which thus increases its complexity. Correspondingly, the NPV (Net Present Value) rule fails to evaluate the value of this project exactly, because this method does not take into account the market uncertainty, irreversibility of investment and ability of delay entry. In this paper, we employ the real option theory to evaluate the project value of a R&D investment. Since the cost of a R&D investment is very high and the flow of the information is crowded, an investor cannot make an immediate decision every time. So, the proposed real option model is an exchange option. At the same time, combining the real option and the game theory, we can find the Nash equilibrium which is the optimal strategy. Moreover, we also study how the delayed time influences the price of the project investment and how the different delayed times effect the choice of the optimal strategies.     

A mixed R&D projects and securities portfolio selection model

The business environment is full of uncertainty. Allocating the wealth among various asset classes may lower the risk of overall portfolio and increase the potential for more benefit over the long term. In this paper, we propose a mixed single-stage R&D projects and multi-stage securities portfolio selection model. Specifically, we present a bi-objective mixed-integer stochastic programming model. Moreover, we use semi-absolute deviation risk functions to measure the risk of mixed asset portfolio. Based on the idea of moments approximation method via linear programming, we propose a scenario generation approach for the mixed single-stage R&D projects and multi-stage securities portfolio selection problem. The bi-objective mixed-integer stochastic programming problem can be solved by transforming it into a single objective mixed-integer stochastic programming problem. A numerical example is given to illustrate the behavior of the proposed mixed single stage R&D projects and multi-stage securities portfolio selection model.     

Discrete Multiattribute Utility Approach to Project Selection

The purpose of this paper is to review various structures of the project-selection problem with discrete multiattribute utility. The approach of maximizing the utility for project selection is discussed where the utility function cannot be measured on a continuous scale. The review includes reference to models of uncertainty versus certainty, and to models assuming the existence of dependence and complementary relations among projects versus independent projects. Project selection in hierarchical organizations with a large number of projects and group decisions is also referred to. The various types of models are formulated and analysed, including applications in the areas of water resources, R&D and nuclear plant location. Finally, directions for future research are suggested.     

Optimizing venture capital investments in a jump diffusion model

We study two practical optimization problems in relation to venture capital investments and/or Research and Development (R&D) investments. In the first problem, given the amount of the initial investment and the cash flow structure at the initial public offering (IPO), the venture capitalist wants to maximize overall discounted cash flows after subtracting subsequent investments, which keep the invested company solvent. We describe this problem as a mixture of singular stochastic control and optimal stopping problems. The second problem is concerned with optimal dividend policy. Rather than selling the company at an IPO, the investor may want to harvest technological achievements in the form of dividend when it is appropriate. The optimal control policy in this problem is a mixture of singular and impulse controls. E. Bayraktar was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, under grant DMS-0604491.     

Optimal selection of R&D projects

A model for the selection process of research and development (R&D) projects belonging to some common area and submitted to a funding agency is presented. Every project is evaluated, the result of this procedure providing the agency with some useful information about the distribution of the project's payoff. The uncertainty due to the unknown perspectives of the whole area of R&D is incorporated in a Bayesian way, so that the agency learns about the area value from the projects already handled. After specifying the model assumptions, adaptive dynamic programming techniques are applied to develop an optimal funding strategy for a given number of submitted projects. Some qualitative properties of the optimal strategy are derived, and the asymptotical behavior of the maximum expected reward is determined.     

Valuation of project portfolios: An endogenously discounted method

Real options analysis (ROA) has been developed to value assets in which managerial flexibilities create significant value. The methodology is ideal for the valuation of projects in which frequent adjustments (e.g. investment deferral, project scope changes, etc) are necessary in response to the realization of market and technological uncertainties. However, ROA has no practical application when valuing portfolios of multiple concurrent projects sharing resources, as the size of the problem grows exponentially with the number of projects and the length of the time horizon. In this paper an extension of ROA suitable for the valuation of project portfolios with substantial technological uncertainty (e.g. R&D portfolios) is proposed. The method exploits the distributed decision making strategy encountered in most organizations to decompose the portfolio valuation problem into a decision-making sub-problem and a set of single project valuation sub-problems that can be sequentially solved. Discrete event simulation is used for the first sub-problem, while a tailored ROA based strategy is used for the set of valuation sub-problems. A case study from the pharmaceutical industry is used to compare the decision tree analysis (DTA) method and the proposed method.     

Chance-constrained programming models for capital budgeting with NPV as fuzzy parameters

In an uncertain economic environment, experts’ knowledge about outlays and cash inflows of available projects consists of much vagueness instead of randomness. Investment outlays and annual net cash flows of a project are usually predicted by using experts’ knowledge. Fuzzy variables can overcome the difficulties in predicting these parameters. In this paper, capital budgeting problem with fuzzy investment outlays and fuzzy annual net cash flows is studied based on credibility measure. Net present value (NPV) method is employed, and two fuzzy chance-constrained programming models for capital budgeting problem are provided. A fuzzy simulation-based genetic algorithm is provided for solving the proposed model problems. Two numerical examples are also presented to illustrate the modelling idea and the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.     

Real R&;D options with time-to-learn and learning-by-doing

We model R&D efforts to enhance the value of a product or technology before final development. Such efforts may be directed towards improving quality, adding new features, or adopting technological innovations. They are implemented as optional, costly and interacting control actions expected to enhance value but with uncertain outcome. We examine the interesting issues of the optimal timing of R&D, the impact of lags in the realization of the R&D outcome, and the choice between accelerated versus staged (sequential) R&D. These issues are also especially interesting since the history of decisions affects future decisions and the distributions of asset prices and induces path-dependency. We show that the existence of optional R&D efforts enhances the investment option value significantly. The impact of a dividend-like payout rate or of project volatility on optimal R&D decisions may be different with R&D timing flexibility than without. The attractiveness of sequential strategies is enhanced in the presence of learning-by-doing and decreasing marginal reversibility of capital effects.     

Optimal Expenditure Patterns of a Double-Path Engineering Project

The optimal expenditure pattern for a double-path engineering project, i.e., a project composed of a nonroutine risky R&D path and a routine nonrisky preparatory path, manufacturing related or marketing related, is studied via the calculus of variations to derive a set of twin second-order nonlinear differential equations whose solution yields the optimal joint expenditure. Assuming independence between the risky and nonrisky paths, a constant return per unit time, a gamma-type unimodal conditional-completion density function for the R&D activity, and the principle of diminishing returns on the effort, we find an interesting interplay between the two paths for the peak position and termination of the expenditures. Counterintuitively, we find that the peak expenditure of the R&D path does not necessarily precede that of the preparatory path, although both path expenditure peaks obey the well-known Kamien–Schwartz theorem. That is, for both paths, the expenditure peak positions precede always the peak of the conditional-completion density function of the R&D path.     

A decision model for interdependent information system project selection

Existing methods for information system (IS) project selection neglect an important aspect of information technology, namely the interdependencies that exist among various IS applications (projects). Recognizing and modeling these project interdependencies provides valuable cost savings and greater benefits to organizations. In this paper, an IS project selection model is developed that identifies and models benefit, resource and technical interdependencies among candidate projects. The proposed model is formulated as a nonlinear 0–1 programming problem and represents a significant addition to existing IS, capital budgeting and R&D project selection models. The model is converted, using linearization techniques, and tested (validated) by applying it to real-world IS project selection data. By comparing the performance of this model with existing project selection models, the contribution of this model is highlighted.     

Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach

The strategic importance of performance evaluation of national R&D programs is highlighted as the resource allocation draws more attention in R&D policy agenda. Due to the heterogeneity of national R&D programs’ objectives, however, it is intractably difficult to relatively evaluate multiple programs and, consequently, few studies have been conducted on the performance comparison of the R&D programs. This study measures and compares the performance of national R&D programs using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Since DEA allows each DMU to choose the optimal weights of inputs and outputs which maximize its efficiency, it can mirror R&D programs’ unique characteristics by assigning relatively high weights to the variables in which each program has strength. Every project in every R&D program is evaluated together based on the DEA model for comparison of efficiency among different systems. Kruskal–Wallis test with a post hoc Mann–Whitney U test is then run to compare performance of R&D programs. Two alternative approaches to incorporating the importance of variables, the AR model and output integration, are also introduced. The results are expected to provide policy implications for effectively formulating and implementing national R&D programs.     

Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments

The vast majority of the project scheduling methodologies presented in the literature have been developed with the objective of minimizing the project duration subject to precedence and other constraints. In doing so, the financial aspects of project management are largely ignored. Recent efforts have taken into account discounted cash flows and have focused on the maximization of the net present value (npv) of the project as the more appropriate objective. In this paper we offer a guided tour through the important recent developments in the expanding field of research on deterministic and stochastic project network models with discounted cash flows. Subsequent to a close examination of the rationale behind the npv objective, we offer a taxonomy of the problems studied in the literature and critically review the major contributions. Proper attention is given to npv maximization models for the unconstrained scheduling problem with known cash flows, optimal and suboptimal scheduling procedures with various types of resource constraints, and the problem of determining both the timing and amount of payments.     

Volatility estimation for stochastic project value models

One of the key parameters in modeling capital budgeting decisions for investments with embedded options is the project volatility. Most often, however, there is no market or historical data available to provide an accurate estimate for this parameter. A common approach to estimating the project volatility in such instances is to use a Monte Carlo simulation where one or more sources of uncertainty are consolidated into a single stochastic process for the project cash flows, from which the volatility parameter can be determined. Nonetheless, the simulation estimation method originally suggested for this purpose systematically overstates the project volatility, which can result in incorrect option values and non-optimal investment decisions. Examples that illustrate this issue numerically have appeared in several recent papers, along with revised estimation methods that address this problem. In this article, we extend that work by showing analytically the source of the overestimation bias and the adjustment necessary to remove it. We then generalize this development for the cases of levered cash flows and non-constant volatility. In each case, we use an example problem to show how a revised estimation methodology can be applied.     

A generalized real option pricing method of R&D investments: jump diffusion and external competition

ABSTRACT

Numerous studies have assessed Research and Development (R&D) investment using the real option pricing approach. This paper proposes a more general real option pricing method that both considers the specificity of R&D investment (such as uncertainty) and the R&D investment opportunity of a business in a market environment with external competitors. Specifically, we adopt a jump diffusion model to evaluate R&D investments that incorporate the uncertainties of these activities. The model values a pioneer's R&D investment opportunity allowing the chance that competitors may enter the market and the project value may vary with time. By construction and analysis of the model, we then analyse the optimal timing to realize profit on an investment. Overall, this model should facilitate a more comprehensive evaluation for R&D investments.     

Project Scheduling with Discounted Cash Flows and Progress Payments

In all large scale projects, there correspond cash flows that incur throughout the life of the project. The scheduling of these projects to maximize the present value of the cash flows has been a topic of recent research. The basic assumption of earlier research is that the cash flows are mainly associated with some events of the project and they occur at the event realization times. However, in several real life projects, the cash inflows do not occur at the event realization times, rather they occur at the end of some time periods, like months, as progress payments. In this article, maximizing the present value of the cash flows in such projects is considered and a mixed-integer formulation of the problem is presented. In this formulation, activity profit curves are defined and used. Computational experience on some randomly generated test problems provides promising results especially when the Benders Decomposition technique is employed for solving the problem.     

Expenditure patterns and timing of patent protection in a competitive R&D environment

In this paper we consider a stochastic R&D decision model for a single firm operating in a competitive environment. The study focuses on the firm's optimal policy which maximizes the expected discounted net return from the project. The firm's policy is composed of two ingredients: a stopping time which determines when the developed technology should be introduced and protected by a patent, and an investment strategy which specifies the expenditure rate throughout the R&D program. The main findings of the study are:

• (a) 

  Under a constant expenditure rate strategy, the optimal stopping time of the project is a control limit policy of the following form: stop whenever the project's state exceeds a fixed critical value, or when a similar technology is introduced and protected by one of the firm's rivals, whichever occurs first.

• (b) 

  For a R&D race model in which the winner-takes-all competition and the loser's return is zero, we show that the firm's optimal expenditure rate throughout the R&D program increases monotonically as a function of the project's state.

In order to gain a better insight regarding optimal R&D programs in competitive markets we examine the effect of key economic parameters on the firm's optimal policy.