P−P Condensation and P−N/P−P Bond Metathesis: Facile Synthesis of Cationic Tri‐ and Tetraphosphanes

[L_C^RP((PhP)₂C₂H₄)][OTf] ( 4 a,b [OTf]) and [L_C^iPrP(PPh₂)₂][OTf] ( 5 b [OTf]) were prepared from the reaction of imidazoliumyl‐substituted dipyrazolylphosphane triflate salts [L_C^RP(pyr)₂][OTf] ( 3 a,b [OTf]; a : R=Me, b =iPr; L_C^R=1,3‐dialkyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐yl; pyr=3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl) with the secondary phosphanes PhP(H)C₂H₄P(H)Ph) and Ph₂PH. A stepwise double P?N/P?P bond metathesis to catena‐tetraphosphane‐2,3‐diium triflate salt [(Ph₂P)₂(L_C^MeP)₂][OTf]₂ ( 7 a [OTf]₂) is observed when reacting 3 a [OTf] with diphosphane P₂Ph₄. The coordination ability of 5 b [OTf] was probed with selected coinage metal salts [Cu(CH₃CN)₄]OTf, AgOTf and AuCl(tht) (tht=tetrahydrothiophene). For AuCl(tht), the helical complex [{(Ph₂PPL_C^iPr)Au}₄][OTf]₄ ( 9 [OTf]₄) was unexpectedly formed as a result of a chloride‐induced P?P bond cleavage. The weakly coordinating triflate anion enables the formation of the expected copper(I) and silver(I) complexes [( 5 b )M(CH₃CN)₃][OTf]₂ (M=Cu, Ag) ( 10 [OTf]₂, 11 [OTf]₂).     

P−P Condensation and P−N/P−P Bond Metathesis: Facile Synthesis of Cationic Tri- and Tetraphosphanes

[L_C^RP((PhP)₂C₂H₄)][OTf] ( 4 a,b [OTf]) and [L_C^iPrP(PPh₂)₂][OTf] ( 5 b [OTf]) were prepared from the reaction of imidazoliumyl-substituted dipyrazolylphosphane triflate salts [L_C^RP(pyr)₂][OTf] ( 3 a,b [OTf]; a : R=Me, b =iPr; L_C^R=1,3-dialkyl-4,5-dimethylimidazol-2-yl; pyr=3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl) with the secondary phosphanes PhP(H)C₂H₄P(H)Ph) and Ph₂PH. A stepwise double P−N/P−P bond metathesis to catena-tetraphosphane-2,3-diium triflate salt [(Ph₂P)₂(L_C^MeP)₂][OTf]₂ ( 7 a [OTf]₂) is observed when reacting 3 a [OTf] with diphosphane P₂Ph₄. The coordination ability of 5 b [OTf] was probed with selected coinage metal salts [Cu(CH₃CN)₄]OTf, AgOTf and AuCl(tht) (tht=tetrahydrothiophene). For AuCl(tht), the helical complex [{(Ph₂PPL_C^iPr)Au}₄][OTf]₄ ( 9 [OTf]₄) was unexpectedly formed as a result of a chloride-induced P−P bond cleavage. The weakly coordinating triflate anion enables the formation of the expected copper(I) and silver(I) complexes [( 5 b )M(CH₃CN)₃][OTf]₂ (M=Cu, Ag) ( 10 [OTf]₂, 11 [OTf]₂).     

Oxorhenium(V) Complexes with 1,3,4‐Triphenyl‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐ylidene

Reactions of the oxorhenium(V) complexes [ReOX₃(PPh₃)₂] (X = Cl, Br) with the N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) 1,3,4‐triphenyl‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐ylidene (L^Ph) under mild conditions and in the presence of MeOH or water give [ReOX₂(Y)(PPh₃)(L^Ph)] complexes (X = Cl, Br; Y = OMe, OH). Attempted reactions of the carbene precursor 5‐methoxy‐1,3,4‐triphenyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole ( 1 ) with [ReOCl₃(PPh₃)₂] or [NBu₄][ReOCl₄] in boiling xylene resulted in protonation of the intermediately formed carbene and decomposition products such as [HL^Ph][ReOCl₄(OPPh₃)], [HL^Ph][ReOCl₄(OH₂)] or [HL^Ph][ReO₄] were isolated. The neutral [ReOX₂(Y)(PPh₃)(HL^Ph)] complexes are purple, airstable solids. The bulky NHC ligands coordinate monodentate and in cis‐position to PPh₃. The relatively long Re–C bond lengths of approximate 2.1Å indicate metal‐carbon single bonds.     

Modified cyclopentadienyl molybdenum compounds with enhanced cytotoxic activity towards MOLT‐4 leukaemia cells

A series of new cyclopentadienyl molybdenum compounds bearing substituted phenanthroline ligands [(η⁵‐C₅H₄CH₂C₆H₄X‐4)Mo(CO)₂(^N,NL)][BF₄] (X = F, Cl, Br; ^N,NL = phen, 5‐NH₂‐phen, 4,7‐Ph₂‐phen) was prepared and characterized using infrared and NMR spectroscopies. Crystal structures of [(η⁵‐C₅H₄CH₂C₆H₄F‐4)Mo(CO)₂(NCMe)₂][BF₄], [(η⁵‐C₅H₄CH₂C₆H₄X‐4)Mo(CO)₂(phen)][BF₄] (X = F, Cl, Br) and [(η⁵‐C₅H₄CH₂C₆H₄Cl‐4)Mo(CO)₂(4,7‐Ph₂‐phen)][BF₄]⋅(4,7‐Ph₂‐phen)⋅HBF₄ were determined using X‐ray diffraction analysis. Biological studies revealed a strong cytotoxic effect of the chelating ligands. Although the cytostatic effect of the halogen in the side chain of the cyclopentadienyl ring is negligible, it could be used for future post‐modification of these types of cytotoxic active molybdenum‐based compounds.     

Zur Reaktion der Alkin‐Kupfer(I)‐Komplexe [CuX(S‐Alkin)] (X = Cl,Br, I; S‐Alkin = 3,3,6,6‐Tetramethyl‐1‐thia‐4‐cycloheptin) mit den Phosphanen PMe3 und Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2 (dppe)

Organometallic Compounds of Copper. XVIII. On the Reaction of the Alkyne Copper(I) Complexes [CuX(S‐Alkyne)] (X = Cl, Br, I; S‐Alkyne = 3,3,6,6‐Tetramethyl‐1‐thiacyclohept‐4‐yne) with the Phosphanes PMe₃ and Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppe) The alkyne copper(I) halide complexes [CuX(S‐Alkyne)]_n ( 2 ) ( 2 a : X = Cl, 2 b : X = Br, 2 c : X = I; S‐Alkyne = 3,3,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1‐thiacyclohept‐4‐yne; n = 2, ∞) add the phosphanes PMe₃ and Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppe) to form the mono‐ and dinuclear copper compounds [(S‐Alkyne)CuX(PMe₃)] ( 6 ) ( 6 a : X = Cl, 6 b : X = Br) and [(S‐Alkyne)CuX(μ‐dppe)CuX(S‐Alkyne)] ( 7 a : X = Cl, 7 b : X = Br, 7 c : X = I), respectively. By‐product in the reaction of 2 a with dppe is the tetranuclear complex [(S‐Alkyne)Cu(μ‐X)₂Cu(μ‐dppe)₂Cu(μ‐X)₂Cu(S‐Alkyne)] ( 8 ). In case of the compounds 7 prolonged reaction times yield the alkyne‐free dinuclear copper complexes [Cu₂X₂(dppe)₃] ( 9 ) ( 9 a : X = Cl, 9 b : X = Br, 9 c : X = I)). X‐ray diffraction studies were carried out with the new compounds 6 a , 6 b , 7 b , 8 , and 9 c .     

Synthesis and Spectra of Cationic Bis(tertiary phosphine) derivatives of cycloheptatrienyliummolybdenum and cyclopentadienyliron complexes

Reaction of [(η-C₇H₇)Mo(CO)₃][PF₆] and [(η-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)₂CH₃CN][PF₆] with ditertiary phosphine ligands afforded products of three types; the monosubstituted complexes [(Ring)M(CO)₂Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂][PF₆] (Ring = η-C₇H₇, M = Mo, N = 1; Ring = η-C₅H₅, M = Fe, N = 1 and 2), the chelated complexes [(Ring)M(CO)Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂][PF₆] (Ring = η-C₇H₇, M = Mo, N = 1 and 2; Ring = η-C₅H₅, M = Fe, N = 1 and 2), and the dinuclear complex [{(η-C₇H₇)Mo(CO)₂}₂ -μ- Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂][(PF₆)₂]. Spectroscopic properties, including ³¹P NMR, are reported.     

Novel Cyclometallated Complexes Derived From a Halogenated Thiosemicarbazone. Crystal and Molecular Structures of 2‐FC6H4C(Me)=NN(H)C(=S)NHPh and [(Pd{2‐FC6H3C(Me)=NN=C(S)NHPh})2(μ‐PPh2(CH2)2PPh2)]

Treatment of the thiosemicarbazone 2‐FC₆H₄C(Me)=NN(H)C(=S)NHPh, a , with palladium(II) acetate in acetic acid, or with lithium tetrachloropalladate(II) in methanol, gave the tetranuclear cyclometallated complex [Pd{2‐FC₆H₃C(Me)=NN=C(S)NHPh}]₄ (1a) . Reaction of 1a with the diphosphines Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂ (dppe), Ph₂PCH=CHPPh₂ (trans‐dpe) Ph₂P(CH₂)₃Ph₂ (dppp) or Ph₂P(CH₂)₄Ph₂ (dppb) in a 1:2 molar ratio gave the dinuclear cyclometallated complexes [(Pd{2‐FC₆H₃C(Me)=NN=C(S)NHPh})₂(μ‐Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂)], (n = 2, 2a ; 3, 4a ; 4, 5a ) and [(Pd{2‐FC₆H₃C(Me)=NN=C(S)NHPh})₂(μ‐Ph₂PCH=CHPPh₂)], ( 3a ). The X‐ray crystal structure of ligand a and of complex 2a are described. The structure of complex 2a shows the palladium atom is bonded to four different donor atoms: C, N, S and P.     

First Dinuclear Copper/Gallium Complexes: Supporting Cu0 and CuI Centres by Low‐Valent Organogallium Ligands

The synthesis and structural characterisation of low‐valent dinuclear copper(I) and copper(0) complexes supported by organogallium ligands has been accomplished for the first time by the reductive coordination reaction of [GaCp*] (Cp*=pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) and [Ga(ddp)] (ddp=HC(CMeNC₆H₃‐2,6‐iPr₂)₂ 2‐diisopropylphenylamino‐4‐diisopropylphenylimino‐2‐pentene) with readily available copper(II) and copper(I) precursors. The treatment of CuBr₂ and Cu(OTf)₂ (OTf=CF₃SO₃) with [Ga(ddp)] under mild conditions resulted in elimination of [Ga(L)₂(ddp)] (L=Br, OTf) and afforded the novel gallium(I)/copper(I) compounds [{(ddp)GaCu(L)}₂] (L=Br ( 1 ), OTf ( 2 )). The single‐crystal X‐ray structure determinations of 1 and 2 reveal that these molecules are composed of {(ddp)GaCu(L)} dimeric units, with planar Cu^I? Ga^I four‐membered rings and short Cu^I???Cu^I distances, with 2 exhibiting the shortest Cu^I???Cu^I contact reported to date of 2.277(3) Å. The all‐gallium coordinated dinuclear [Cu₂(GaCp*)(μ‐GaCp*)₃Ga(OTf)₃] ( 3 ) is formed when Cu(OTf)₂ is combined with [GaCp*] instead of [Ga(ddp)]. Notably, in the course of this redox reaction Lewis acidic Ga(OTf)₃ is formed, which coordinates to one of the electron‐rich copper(0) centres. Compound 3 is suggested as the first case of a structurally characterised complex of copper(0). By changing the copper(II) to a copper(I) source, that is, [Cu(cod)₂][OTf] (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene), the salt [Cu₂(GaCp*)₃(μ‐GaCp*)₂][OTf]₂ ( 4 ) is formed, the cationic part of which is related to previously described isoelectronic dinuclear d¹⁰ complexes of the type [M₂(GaCp*)₅] (M=Pd, Pt).     

Cyclopentadienyl Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Bridging Alkynylphosphine Ligands: Synthesis and Electrochemical Studies

The reaction of [CpRuCl(PPh₃)₂] (Cp=cyclopentadienyl) and [CpRuCl(dppe)] (dppe=Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂) with bis‐ and tris‐phosphine ligands 1,4‐(Ph₂PC≡C)₂C₆H₄ ( 1 ) and 1,3,5‐(Ph₂PC≡C)₃C₆H₃ ( 2 ), prepared by Ni‐catalysed cross‐coupling reactions between terminal alkynes and diphenylchlorophosphine, has been investigated. Using metal‐directed self‐assembly methodologies, two linear bimetallic complexes, [{CpRuCl(PPh₃)}₂(μ‐dppab)] ( 3 ) and [{CpRu(dppe)}₂(μ‐dppab)](PF₆)₂ ( 4 ), and the mononuclear complex [CpRuCl(PPh₃)(η¹‐dppab)] ( 6 ), which contains a “dangling arm” ligand, were prepared (dppab=1,4‐bis[(diphenylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene). Moreover, by using the triphosphine 1,3,5‐tris[(diphenylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene (tppab), the trimetallic [{CpRuCl(PPh₃)}₃(μ₃‐tppab)] ( 5 ) species was synthesised, which is the first example of a chiral‐at‐ruthenium complex containing three different stereogenic centres. Besides these open‐chain complexes, the neutral cyclic species [{CpRuCl(μ‐dppab)}₂] ( 7 ) was also obtained under different experimental conditions. The coordination chemistry of such systems towards supramolecular assemblies was tested by reaction of the bimetallic precursor 3 with additional equivalents of ligand 2 . Two rigid macrocycles based on cis coordination of dppab to [CpRu(PPh₃)] were obtained, that is, the dinuclear complex [{CpRu(PPh₃)(μ‐dppab)}₂](PF₆)₂ ( 8 ) and the tetranuclear square [{CpRu(PPh₃)(μ‐dppab)}₄](PF₆)₄ ( 9 ). The solid‐state structures of 7 and 8 have been determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis and show a different arrangement of the two parallel dppab ligands. All compounds were characterised by various methods including ESIMS, electrochemistry and by X‐band ESR spectroscopy in the case of the electrogenerated paramagnetic species.     

Redox and Anion Exchange Chemistry of a Stibine–Nickel Complex: Writing the L,X, Z Ligand Alphabet with a Single Element

According to the covalent bond classification (CBC) method, two‐electron donors are defined as L‐type ligands, one‐electron donors as X‐type ligands, and two‐electron acceptors as Z‐type ligands. These three ligand functions are usually associated to the nature of the ligating atom, with phosphine, alkyl, and borane groups being prototypical examples of L‐, X‐ and Z‐ligands, respectively. A new SbNi platform is reported in which the ligating Sb atom can assume all three CBC ligand functions. Using both experimental and computational data, it is shown that PhICl₂ oxidation of (o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₃SbNi(PPh₃) ( 1 ) into [(o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₃ClSb]NiCl ( 2 ) is accompanied by a conversion of the stibine L‐type ligand of 1 into a stiboranyl X‐type ligand in 2 . Furthermore, the reaction of 2 with the catecholate dianion in the presence of cyclohexyl isocyanide results in the formation of [(o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₃(o‐O₂C₆H₄Sb)]Ni(CNCy) ( 4 ), a complex featuring a nickel atom coordinated by a Lewis acidic, Z‐type, stiborane ligand.     

Titanium(IV) and Zirconium(IV) Sulfato Complexes Containing the Kläui Tripodal Ligand: Molecular Models of Sulfated Metal Oxide Surfaces

Treatment of titanyl sulfate in about 60 mM sulfuric acid with NaL_OEt (L_OEt^?=[(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Co{P(O)(OEt)₂}₃]^?) afforded the μ‐sulfato complex [(L_OEtTi)₂(μ‐O)₂(μ‐SO₄)] ( 2 ). In more concentrated sulfuric acid (>1 M ), the same reaction yielded the di‐μ‐sulfato complex [(L_OEtTi)₂(μ‐O)(μ‐SO₄)₂] ( 3 ). Reaction of 2 with HOTf (OTf=triflate, CF₃SO₃) gave the tris(triflato) complex [L_OEtTi(OTf)₃] ( 4 ), whereas treatment of 2 with Ag(OTf) in CH₂Cl₂ afforded the sulfato‐capped trinuclear complex [{(L_OEt)₃Ti₃(μ‐O)₃}(μ₃‐SO₄){Ag(OTf)}][OTf] ( 5 ), in which the Ag(OTf) moiety binds to a μ‐oxo group in the Ti₃(μ‐O)₃ core. Reaction of 2 in H₂O with Ba(NO₃)₂ afforded the tetranuclear complex (L_OEt)₄Ti₄(μ‐O)₆ ( 6 ). Treatment of 2 with [{Rh(cod)Cl}₂] (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene), [Re(CO)₅Cl], and [Ru(tBu₂bpy)(PPh₃)₂Cl₂] (tBu₂bpy=4,4′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′‐dipyridyl) in the presence of Ag(OTf) afforded the heterometallic complexes [(L_OEt)₂Ti₂(O)₂(SO₄){Rh(cod)}₂][OTf]₂ ( 7 ), [(L_OEt)₂Ti(O)₂(SO₄){Re(CO)₃}][OTf] ( 8 ), and [{(L_OEt)₂Ti₂(μ‐O)}(μ₃‐SO₄)(μ‐O)₂{Ru(PPh₃)(tBu₂bpy)}][OTf]₂ ( 9 ), respectively. Complex 9 is paramagnetic with a measured magnetic moment of about 2.4 μ_B. Treatment of zirconyl nitrate with NaL_OEt in 3.5 M sulfuric acid afforded [(L_OEt)₂Zr(NO₃)][L_OEtZr(SO₄)(NO₃)] ( 10 ). Reaction of ZrCl₄ in 1.8 M sulfuric acid with NaL_OEt in the presence Na₂SO₄ gave the μ‐sulfato‐bridged complex [L_OEtZr(SO₄)(H₂O)]₂(μ‐SO₄) ( 11 ). Treatment of 11 with triflic acid afforded [(L_OEt)₂Zr][OTf]₂ ( 12 ), whereas reaction of 11 with Ag(OTf) afforded a mixture of 12 and trinuclear [{L_OEtZr(SO₄)(H₂O)}₃(μ₃‐SO₄)][OTf] ( 13 ). The Zr^IV triflato complex [L_OEtZr(OTf)₃] ( 14 ) was prepared by reaction of L_OEtZrF₃ with Me₃SiOTf. Complexes 4 and 14 can catalyze the Diels–Alder reaction of 1,3‐cyclohexadiene with acrolein in good selectivity. Complexes 2 – 5 , 9 – 11 , and 13 have been characterized by X‐ray crystallography.     

Redox and Anion Exchange Chemistry of a Stibine–Nickel Complex: Writing the L,X, Z Ligand Alphabet with a Single Element

According to the covalent bond classification (CBC) method, two‐electron donors are defined as L‐type ligands, one‐electron donors as X‐type ligands, and two‐electron acceptors as Z‐type ligands. These three ligand functions are usually associated to the nature of the ligating atom, with phosphine, alkyl, and borane groups being prototypical examples of L‐, X‐ and Z‐ligands, respectively. A new SbNi platform is reported in which the ligating Sb atom can assume all three CBC ligand functions. Using both experimental and computational data, it is shown that PhICl₂ oxidation of (o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₃SbNi(PPh₃) ( 1 ) into [(o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₃ClSb]NiCl ( 2 ) is accompanied by a conversion of the stibine L‐type ligand of 1 into a stiboranyl X‐type ligand in 2 . Furthermore, the reaction of 2 with the catecholate dianion in the presence of cyclohexyl isocyanide results in the formation of [(o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₃(o‐O₂C₆H₄Sb)]Ni(CNCy) ( 4 ), a complex featuring a nickel atom coordinated by a Lewis acidic, Z‐type, stiborane ligand.     

Establishing the Coordination Chemistry of Antimony(V) Cations: Systematic Assessment of Ph4Sb(OTf) and Ph3Sb(OTf)2 as Lewis Acceptors

The coordination chemistry of the stiboranes Ph₄Sb(OTf) ( 1 a , OTf = OSO₂CF₃) and Ph₃Sb(OTf)₂ ( 3 ) with Lewis bases has been investigated. The significant steric encumbrance of the Sb center in 1 a precludes interaction with most ligands, but the relatively low steric demands of 4‐methylpyridine‐N‐oxide (OPyrMe) and OPMe₃ enabled the characterization of [Ph₄Sb(OPyrMe)][OTf] ( 2 a ) and [Ph₄Sb(OPMe₃)][OTf] ( 2 b ), rare examples of structurally characterized complexes of stibonium acceptors. In contrast, 3 was found to engage a variety of Lewis bases, forming stable isolable complexes of the form [Ph₃Sb(donor)₂][OTf]₂ [donor=OPMe₃ ( 6 a ), OPCy₃ ( 6 b , Cy=cyclohexyl), OPPh₃ ( 6 c ), OPyrMe ( 6 d )], [Ph₃Sb(dmap)₂(OTf)][OTf] ( 6 e , dmap=4‐(dimethylamino)pyridine) and [Ph₃Sb(donor)(OTf)][OTf] [donor=1,10‐phenanthroline ( 7 a ) or 2,2′‐bipy ( 7 b , bipy=bipyridine)]. These compounds exhibit significant structural diversity in the solid‐state, and undergo ligand exchange reactions in line with their assignment as coordination complexes. Compound 3 did not form stable complexes with phosphine donors, with reactions instead leading to redox processes yielding SbPh₃ and products of phosphine oxidation.     

Der Einfluß von Phosphoryl‐Substituenten auf die Eigenschaften P‐substituierter 2‐Methylimidazolium‐Ionen und 2‐Methylenimidazoline [1]

The Influence of Phosphoryl Substituents on the Properties of P‐Substituted 2‐Methylimidazolium Ions and 2‐Methyleneimidazolines [1] The imidazolines ImCHP(E)Ph₂ [ 6 , E = S ( a ), Se ( b )] are obtained from ImCHPPh₂ ( 4 ) and sulfur or selenium. HBF₄ reaction yields the corresponding imidazolium salts [ImCH₂P(E)Ph₂][BF₄] [ 5 , E = S ( a ), Se ( b )]. 1, 3, 4, 5‐Tetramethyl‐2‐methylenimidazoline ( 1 , ImCH₂) reacts with Ph₂P(O)Cl to give the corresponding phosphane salt [ImCH₂P(O)Ph₂]Cl ( 7 ) from which the vinyl compound ImCHP(O)Ph₂ ( 8 ) is formed through deprotonation. 8 reacts with excess HBF₄ to give the phosphine oxide BF₃ adduct [ImCH₂P(O)Ph₂ · BF₃][BF₄] ( 9 ). The crystal structures of 5a , 5b , 6b , 7 · CH₂Cl₂ and 9 · H₂O as well as preliminary data of 8 are reported and discussed on comparison with the phosphanes [ImCH₂PPh₂][BF₄] ( 3b ) and ImCHPPh₂ ( 4 ). From structural data, π‐electron delocalisation is concluded for 6b and 8 .     

Syntheses and X‐Ray Crystal Structures of New Copper(I) and Silver(I) Complexes containing Thione Ligands

The reaction of [(Ph₃P)₂CuCl]₂ with 4‐amino‐6‐methyl‐1,2,4‐triazine‐thione‐5‐one (AMTTO, 1 ) in methanol and further recrystallization from methanol/acetone solution gives [(C₄H₄N₃SON(=CMe₂)Cu(PPh₃)₂Cl] ( 2 ) as a neutral complex. [(C₄H₄N₃SON(=CMe₂)Ag(PPh₃)₂]NO₃ ( 4 ) can be obtained in excellent yield by the reaction of [(AMTTO)₂Ag]NO₃ ( 3 ) with triphenylphosphane in methanol/acetone. Both complexes were characterized by infrared spectroscopy, elemental analyses as well as by X‐ray diffraction studies. Crystal data for 2 at –80 °C: space group P1 with a = 1233.8(1), b = 1389.7(1), c = 1417.1(1) pm, α = 89.36(1)°; β = 65.10(1)°, γ = 65.95(1)°, Z = 2, R₁ = 0.0582 and for 4 at –80 °C: space group P1, with a = 1193.3(1), b = 1308.5(1), c = 1385.3(1) pm, α = 94.69(1)°, β = 109.14(1)°, γ = 93.42(1)°, Z = 2, R₁ = 0.0716.     

Neue Silber‐Tellurid Cluster stabilisiert mit zweizähnigen Phosphanen: Synthese und Struktur von {[Ag5(TePh)6(Ph2P(CH2)2PPh3)](Ph2P(CH2)2PPh2)}∞, [Ag18Te(TePh)15(Ph2P(CH2)3PPh2)3Cl] und [Ag38Te13(TetBu)12(Ph2P(CH2)2PPh2)3]

Novel Silver‐Telluride Clusters Stabilised with Bidentate Phosphine Ligands: Synthesis and Structure of {[Ag₅(TePh)₆(Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₃)](Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂)}_∞, [Ag₁₈Te(TePh)₁₅(Ph₂P(CH₂)₃PPh₂)₃Cl], and [Ag₃₈Te₁₃(Te t Bu)₁₂(Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂)₃] Bidentate phosphine ligands have been found effective to stabilise polynuclear cores containing silver and chalcogenide ligands. They can act as intra and intermolecular bridges between the silver centres. The clusters {[Ag₅(TePh)₆(Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₃)](Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂)}_∞ ( 1 ), [Ag₁₈Te(TePh)₁₅(Ph₂P(CH₂)₃PPh₂)₃Cl] ( 2 ), and [Ag₃₈Te₁₃(TetBu)₁₂(Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂)₃] ( 3 ) have been prepared and their molecular structure determined. Compound 2 and 3 are molecular structures with separated cluster cores while 1 forms a polymeric chain bridged by phosphine ligands. ( 1 : space group P2₁/c (No. 14), Z = 4, a = 3518,1(7) pm, b = 2260,6(5) pm, c = 3522,1(7) pm, β = 119,19(3)°; 2 : space group R3 (No. 148), Z = 6, a = b = 3059,4(4) pm, c = 5278,8(9) pm; 3: space group Pccn (No. 56), Z = 4, a = 3613,0(9) pm, b = 3608,6(7) pm, c = 2153,5(8) pm)     

Platinum,iridium and rhodium complexes with substituted bis-(diphenylphosphino)methane ligands Ph2PCH(R)PPh2 (R = Me,Ph or SiMe3)

Substituted phosphines of the type Ph₂PCH(R)PPh₂ and their Pt^II complexes [PtX₂{Ph₂PCH(R)PPh₂}] (R = Me, Ph or SiMe₃; X = halide) were prepared. Treatment of [PtCl₂(NCBu^t)₂] with Ph₂PCH(SiMe₃)-PPh₂ gave [PtCl₂(Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], while treatment with Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂ gave [Pt{Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂}₂]Cl₂. Reaction of p-MeC₆H₄C≡CLi or PhC≡CLi with [PtX₂{Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂}] gave [Pt(C≡CC₆H₄Me-p)₂-{Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂}] (X = I) and [Pt{Ph₂PC(Me)PPh₂}₂](X = Cl),while reaction of p-MeC₆H₄C≡CLi with [Pt{Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂}₂]Cl₂ gave [Pt{Ph₂PC(Ph)PPh₂}₂]. The platinum complexes [PtMe₂(dpmMe)] or [Pt(CH₂)₄(dpmMe)] fail to undergo ring-opening on treatment with one equivalent of dpmMe [dpmMe = Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂]. Treatment of [Ir(CO)Cl(PPh₃)₂] with two equivalents of dpmMe gave [Ir(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl. The PF₆ salt was also prepared. Treatment of [Ir(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl with [Cu(C≡CPh)₂], [AgCl(PPh₃)] or [AuCl(PPh₃)] failed to give heterobimetallic complexes. Attempts to prepare the dinuclear rhodium complex [Rh₂(CO)₃(μ-Cl)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ using a procedure similar to that employed for an analogous dpm (dpm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) complex were unsuccessful. Instead, the mononuclear complex [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ was obtained. The corresponding chloride and PF₆ salts were also prepared. Attempts to prepare [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl in CHCl₃ gave [RhHCl(dpmMe)₂]Cl. Recrystallization of [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ from CHCl₃/EtOH gave [RhO₂(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄. Treatment of [Rh(CO)₂Cl₂]₂ with one equivalent of dpmMe per Rh atom gave two compounds, [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl and a dinuclear complex that undergoes exchange at room temperature between two formulae: [Rh₂(CO)₂(μ-Cl)(μ-CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl and [Rh₂(CO)₂-(μ-Cl)(dpmMe)₂]Cl. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Reactivity Studies of η5‐ Indenyl and η5‐Cp* Ruthenium(II) Complexes towards some Polypyridyl Ligands

The reaction of [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl], where; L³ = C₉H₇ ( 1 ), C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ( 2 ) with acetonitrile in the presence of [NH₄][PF₆] yielded cationic complexes [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)][PF₆]; L³= C₉H₇ ([3]PF₆) and L³ = C₅Me₅ ([4]PF₆), respectively. Complexes [3]PF₆ and [4]PF₆ reacts with some polypyridyl ligands viz, 2,3‐bis (α‐pyridyl) pyrazine (bpp), 2,3‐bis (α‐pyridyl) quinoxaline (bpq) yielding the complexes of the formulation [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)(L²)]PF₆ where; L³ = C₉H₇, L² = bpp, ([5]PF₆), L³ = C₉H₇, L² = bpq, ([6]PF₆); L³ = C₅Me₅, L² = bpp, ([7]PF₆) and bpq, ([8]PF₆), respectively. However reaction of [(η⁵‐C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)][PF₆] ([3]PF₆) with the sterically demanding polypyridyl ligands, viz. 2,4,6‐tris(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine (tptz) or tetra‐2‐pyridyl‐1,4‐pyrazine (tppz) leads to the formation of unexpected complexes [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L²)(CH₃CN)][PF₆]₂; L² = tppz ([9](PF₆)₂), tptz ([11](PF₆)₂) and [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L²)Cl][PF₆]; L² = tppz ([10]PF₆), tptz ([12]PF₆). The complexes were isolated as their hexafluorophosphate salts. They have been characterized on the basis of micro analytical and spectroscopic data. The crystal structures of the representative complexes were established by X‐ray crystallography.     

Facile Carbon–Fluorine Bond Activation and Subsequent Functionalisation of 1,1‐Difluoroethylene and Tetrafluoroethylene Promoted by Adjacent Metal Centres

The bridging fluoroolefin ligands in the complexes [Ir₂(CH₃)(CO)₂(μ‐olefin)(dppm)₂][OTf] (olefin=tetrafluoroethylene, 1,1‐difluoroethylene; dppm=μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂; OTf^?=CF₃SO₃^?) are susceptible to facile fluoride ion abstraction. Both fluoroolefin complexes react with trimethylsilyltriflate (Me₃SiOTf) to give the corresponding fluorovinyl products by abstraction of a single fluoride ion. Although the trifluorovinyl ligand is bound to one metal, the monofluorovinyl group is bridging, bound to one metal through carbon and to the other metal through a dative bond from fluorine. Addition of two equivalents of Me₃SiOTf to the tetrafluoroethylene‐bridged species gives the difluorovinylidene‐bridged product [Ir₂(CH₃)(OTf)(CO)₂(μ‐OTf)(μ‐C?CF₂)(dppm)₂][OTf]. The 1,1‐difluoroethylene species is exceedingly reactive, reacting with water to give 2‐fluoropropene and [Ir₂(CO)₂(μ‐OH)(dppm)₂][OTf] and with carbon monoxide to give [Ir₂(CO)₃(μ‐κ¹:η²‐C?CCH₃)(dppm)₂][OTf] together with two equivalents of HF. The trifluorovinyl product [Ir₂(κ¹‐C₂F₃)(OTf)(CO)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐CH₂)(dppm)₂][OTf], obtained through single C? F bond activation of the tetrafluoroethylene‐bridged complex, reacts with H₂ to form trifluoroethylene, allowing the facile replacement of one fluorine in C₂F₄ with hydrogen.