Micellar Interactions in Nonionic/Ionic Mixed Surfactant Systems

To study the influence of the chemical nature of headgroups and the type of counterion on the process of micellization in mixed surfactant systems, the cmc's of several binary mixtures of surfactants with the same length of hydrocarbon tail but with different headgroups have been determined as a function of the monomer composition using surface tension measurements. Based on these results, the interaction parameter between the surfactant species in mixed micelles has been determined using the pseudophase separation model. Experiments were carried out with (a) the nonionic/anionic C(12)E(6)/SDS ((hexa(ethyleneglycol) mono-n-dodecyl ether)/(sodium dodecyl sulfate)), (b) amphoteric/anionic DDAO/SDS ((dodecyldimethylamine oxide)/(sodium dodecyl sulfate)), and (c) amphoteric/nonionic C(12)E(6)/DDAO mixed surfactant systems. In the case of the mixed surfactant systems containing DDAO, experiments were carried out at pH 2 and pH 8 where the surfactant was in the cationic and nonionic form, respectively. It was shown that the mixtures of the nonionic surfactants with different kinds of headgroups exhibit almost ideal behavior, whereas for the nonionic/ionic surfactant mixtures, significant deviations from ideal behavior (attractive interactions) have been found, suggesting binding between the head groups. Molecular orbital calculations confirmed the existence of the strong specific interaction between (1) SDS and nonionic and cationic forms of DDAO and between (2) C(12)E(6) and the cationic form of DDAO. In the case for the C(12)E(6)/SDS system, an alternative mechanism for the stabilization of mixed micelles was suggested, which involved the lowering in the free energy of the hydration layer. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.     

Foaming and foam stability for mixed polymer-surfactant solutions: effects of surfactant type and polymer charge

Solutions of surfactant-polymer mixtures often exhibit different foaming properties, compared to the solutions of the individual components, due to the strong tendency for formation of polymer-surfactant complexes in the bulk and on the surface of the mixed solutions. A generally shared view in the literature is that electrostatic interactions govern the formation of these complexes, for example between anionic surfactants and cationic polymers. In this study we combine foam tests with model experiments to evaluate and explain the effect of several polymer-surfactant mixtures on the foaminess and foam stability of the respective solutions. Anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants (SDS, C(12)TAB, and C(12)EO(23)) were studied to clarify the role of surfactant charge. Highly hydrophilic cationic and nonionic polymers (polyvinylamine and polyvinylformamide, respectivey) were chosen to eliminate the (more trivial) effect of direct hydrophobic interactions between the surfactant tails and the hydrophobic regions on the polymer chains. Our experiments showed clearly that the presence of opposite charges is not a necessary condition for boosting the foaminess and foam stability in the surfactant-polymer mixtures studied. Clear foam boosting (synergistic) effects were observed in the mixtures of cationic surfactant and cationic polymer, cationic surfactant and nonionic polymer, and anionic surfactant and nonionic polymer. The mixtures of anionic surfactant and cationic polymer showed improved foam stability, however, the foaminess was strongly reduced, as compared to the surfactant solutions without polymer. No significant synergistic or antagonistic effects were observed for the mixture of nonionic surfactant (with low critical micelle concentration) and nonionic polymer. The results from the model experiments allowed us to explain the observed trends by the different adsorption dynamics and complex formation pattern in the systems studied.     

Interfacial molecular array behaviors of mixed surfactant systems based on sodium laurylglutamate and the effect on the foam properties

The foam properties of mixtures of an eco-friendly amino-acid derived surfactant sodium lauroylglutamate (LGS) interacting with cationic surfactant dodecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (DTAB), nonionic surfactant laurel alkanolamide (LAA) and anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS), were investigated, respectively. It was amazing that the three investigated binary-mixed systems all showed obviously synergism effect on foaming, though LGS/DTAB catanionic mixture showed remarkable synergistic effect with no surprise. The equilibrium and dynamic surface activity, along with the interfacial molecular array behaviors of binary-mixed systems with different molar ratios at air/water surface were also studied. Moreover, the theoretical simulation was employed to investigate how the interfacial behaviors of surfactants at air/water surface affected the foam properties. The study might provide the meaningful guidance for utilizing the LGS-based systems, especially in constructing eco-friendly foam systems in the application areas of cosmetics, medicine and detergent.     

Synergism and Physicochemical Properties of Anionic/Amphoteric Surfactant Mixtures with Nonionic Surfactant of Amine Oxide Type

The physicochemical properties of initial formulation, that is anionic/amphoteric surfactants mixture SLES/AOS/CAB (sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES), α-olefin sulfonates (AOS) and cocamidopropyl betaine (CAB) at ratio 80 : 15 : 5) with nonionic surfactant of amine oxide type (lauramine oxide (AO)) in various concentration (1–5%) were studied. To characterize the surfactants mixture, the critical micelle concentration (CMC), surface tension (γ), foam volume, biodegradability and irritability were determined. This study showed that adding of AO in those mixtures lowered both γ and CMC as well as enhanced SLES/AOS/CAB foaming properties, but did not significantly affect biodegradability and irritability of initial formulation. Moreover, an increase in AO concentration has a meaningful synergistic effect on the initial formulation properties. All those results indicates that a nonionic surfactant of amine oxide type significantly improves the performance of anionic/amphoteric mixed micelle systems, and because of that anionic/amphoteric/nonionic mixture can be used in considerably lower concentrations as a cleaning formulation.

     

Self-assembly in mixed dialkyl chain cationic-nonionic surfactant mixtures: dihexadecyldimethyl ammonium bromide-monododecyl hexaethylene glycol (monododecyl dodecaethylene glycol) mixtures

The self-assembly of dialkyl chain cationic surfactant dihexadecyldimethyl ammonium bromide, DHDAB, and nonionic surfactants monododecyl hexaethylene glycol, C(12)E(6), and monododecyl dodecaethylene glycol, C(12)E(12), mixtures has been studied using predominantly small-angle neutron scattering, SANS. The scattering data have been used to produce a detailed phase diagram for the two surfactant mixtures and to quantify the microstructure in the different regions of the phase diagram. For cationic-surfactant-rich compositions, the microstructure is in the form of bilamellar, blv, or multilamellar, mlv, vesicles at low surfactant concentrations and is in an L(beta) lamellar phase at higher surfactant concentrations. For nonionic-rich compositions, the microstructure is predominantly in the form of relatively small globular mixed surfactant micelles, L(1). At intermediate compositions, there is an extensive mixed (blv/mlv) L(beta)/L(1) region. Although broadly similar, in detail there are significant differences in the phase behavior of DHDAB/C(12)E(6) and DHDAB/C(12)E(12) as a result of the increasing curvature associated with C(12)E(12) aggregates compared to that of C 12E 6 aggregates. For the DHDAB/C(12)E(12) mixture, the mixed (blv/mlv) L(beta)/L(1) phase region is more extensive. Furthermore, C(12)E(12) has a greater impact upon the rigidity of the bilayer in the blv, mlv, and L(beta) regions than is the case for C(12)E(6). The general features of the phase behavior are also reminiscent of that observed in phospholipid/surfactant mixtures and other related systems.     

PEP与阴离子表面活性剂复配体系泡沫性能的研究

研究了PEP型非离子表面活性剂分别与十二烷基苯磺酸钠（DBS）,十二烷基硫酸钠（SDS）形成复配体系的泡沫性能,讨论了浓度及配比的变化对泡沫性能的影响,结果表明起泡性和稳泡性皆随混合表面活性剂的浓度的上升而增强;在一定浓度下,随着PEP比例下降,起泡性和稳泡性也随着增大,并达到稳定值。     

Oleate Ester-Derived Nonionic Surfactants: Synthesis and Cloud Point Behavior Studies

The synthesis and cloud point behavior of high oleate ester-derived nonionic surfactants are now reported. The effect of various polyethoxylate chain lengths (polyethylene glycol with 7, 11, and 16 units of ethylene oxide (EO) monomer) as the surfactant's hydrophilic head on the cloud point was investigated. The effect of varying amounts of sodium chloride and five different ionic surfactants on the cloud points of the synthesized nonionic surfactants were also presented. When the chain length of polyethoxylate increased, the cloud point of the synthesized nonionic surfactant also increased, ranging from 16°C, 43°C, and 64°C for 7, 11, and 16 EO units, respectively. Increments in sodium chloride concentration depressed the cloud point values of the synthesized nonionic surfactants linearly. The addition of ionic surfactants elevated the cloud points of the synthesized nonionic surfactant. However, in the presence of sodium chloride, the cloud point of the mixed ionic-nonionic solution was suppressed and anincrease in ionic surfactant concentration was required to elevate the cloud point. It was also found that the cloud points of synthesized surfactants can be raised up to 95°C in the presence of 4wt% NaCl solution.     

Interplay between the surface adsorption and solution-phase behavior in dialkyl chain cationic-nonionic surfactant mixtures

Neutron reflectivity, NR, and surface tension have been used to study the adsorption at the air-solution interface of mixtures of the dialkyl chain cationic surfactant dihexadecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide (DHDAB) and the nonionic surfactants monododecyl triethylene glycol (C12E3), monododecyl hexaethylene glycol (C12E6), and monododecyl dodecaethylene glycol (C12E12). The adsorption behavior of the surfactant mixtures with solution composition shows a marked departure from ideal mixing that is not consistent with current theories of nonideal mixing. For all three binary surfactant mixtures there is a critical composition below which the surface is totally dominated by the cationic surfactant. The onset of nonionic surfactant adsorption (expressed as a mole fraction of the nonionic surfactant) increases in composition as the ethylene oxide chain length of the nonionic cosurfactant increases from E3 to E12. Furthermore, the variation in the adsorption is strongly correlated with the variation in the phase behavior of the solution that is in equilibrium with the surface. The adsorbed amounts of DHDAB and the nonionic cosurfactants have been used to estimate the monomer concentration that is in equilibrium with the surface and are shown to be in reasonable qualitative agreement with the variation in the mixed critical aggregation concentration (cac).     

Mixed Micellization of Dimeric (Gemini) Surfactants and Conventional Surfactants

The aqueous solutions of mixtures of various conventional surfactants and dimeric anionic and cationic surfactants have been investigated by electrical conductivity, spectrofluorometry, and time-resolved fluorescence quenching to determine the critical micelle concentrations and the micelle aggregation numbers in these mixtures. The following systems have been investigated: 12-2-12/DTAB, 12-2-12/C(12)E(6), 12-2-12/C(12)E(8), 12-3-12/C(12)E(8), Dim3/C(12)E(8), and Dim4/C(12)E(8) (12-2-12 and 12-3-12=dimethylene-1,2- and trimethylene-1,3-bis(dodecyldimethylammonium bromide), respectively; C(12)E(6) and C(12)E(8)=hexa- and octaethyleneglycol monododecylethers, respectively; Dim3 and Dim4=anionic dimeric surfactants of the disodium sulfonate type, Scheme 1; DTAB=dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide). For the sake of comparison the conventional surfactant mixtures DTAB/C(12)E(8) and SDS/C(12)E(8) (SDS=sodium dodecylsulfate) have also been investigated (reference systems). Synergism in micelle formation (presence of a minimum in the cmc vs composition plot) has been observed for the Dim4/C(12)E(8) mixture but not for other dimeric surfactant/nonionic surfactant mixtures investigated. The aggregation numbers of the mixed reference systems DTAB/C(12)E(8) and SDS/C(12)E(8) vary monotonously with composition from the value of the aggregation number of the pure C(12)E(8) to that of the pure ionic component. In contrast, the aggregation number of the dimeric surfactant/C(12)E(8) mixtures goes through a minimum at a low value of the dimeric surfactant mole fraction. This minimum does not appear to be correlated to the existence of synergism in micelle formation. The initial decrease of the aggregation number of the nonionic surfactant upon addition of ionic surfactant, up to a mole fraction of ionic surfactant of about 0.2 (in equivalent per total equivalent), depends little on the nature the surfactant, whether conventional or dimeric. The results also show that the microviscosity of the systems containing dimeric surfactants is larger than that of the reference systems. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.     

Study of Cryostructuring of Polymer Systems: 25. The Influence of Surfactants on the Properties and Structure of Gas-Filled (Foamed) Poly(vinyl alcohol) Cryogels

Foamed poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) cryogels are studied. Such heterogeneous gel composites are formed as a result of the cryogenic treatment (freezing—storage in a frozen state—thawing) of water— PVA liquid foams in the absence and presence of surfactants. It is shown that the addition of ionic and nonionic surfactants to an aqueous PVA solution and its subsequent foaming result in the formation of liquid foam whose stability is lower than that of the foam prepared from an aqueous PVA solution in the absence of surfactant, i.e., surfactants cause a destabilizing effect on the foams containing PVA. Gas-filled PVA cryogels formed as a result of freezing—thawing of such foams contain large (up to ～180 μm) pores (air bubbles incorporated into the matrix of heterogeneous gel). Mechanical and thermal properties of cryogels depend on the nature and concentration of surfactants, as well as on the regime of cryogenic treatment. The rigidity of foamed PVA cryogels prepared in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide ionic surfactants is lower and that in the presence of nonionic decaoxyethylene cetyl ether is higher than for equiconcentrated (by the polymer) foamed PVA cryogel containing no surfactant. Microscopic studies and the analysis of obtained images of cryogel structure demonstrate that the effect of surfactant on the morphology of freezing foam can be different, depending on the type of surfactant added to the initial system. This leads to foam-destabilizing effects such as the collapse, deformation, and coalescence of air bubbles; the failure of gel phase structure near the bubble surface; etc. However, the complete disintegration of the foamed structure is prevented by a very high viscosity of the unfrozen liquid microphase of a macroscopically solid sample and by the cryotropic PVA gelation that fixes the structure of partially destroyed foam.     

Study of mixtures of n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside with anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactant in aqueous solutions using surface tension and fluorescence techniques

Surfactants of practical interest are invariably mixtures of different types. In this study, mixtures of sugar-based n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside with cationic dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide, anionic sodium dodecylsulfate, and nonionic pentaethyleneglycol monododecyl ether in solution, with and without supporting electrolyte, have been studied using surface tension and fluorescence spectroscopic techniques. Interaction parameters and mole fraction of components in mixed micelles were calculated using regular solution theory. The magnitude of interactions between n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside and other surfactants followed the order anionic/nonionic > cationic/nonionic > nonionic/nonionic mixtures. Since all surfactants have the same hydrophobic groups, strengths of interactions are attributed to the structures of hydrophilic headgroups. Electrolyte reduced synergism between n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside and ionic surfactant due to charge neutralization. Industrial sugar-based surfactant, dodecyl polyglucoside, yielded results similar to that with dodecyl maltoside, implying that tested commercial alkyl polyglucosides are similar to the pure laboratory samples in synergistic interactions with other surfactants. Fluorescence study not only supported the cmc results using tensiometry, but showed that interfaces of all the above mixed micelle/solution interfaces are mildly hydrophobic. Based on these results, an attempt is made to discover the nature of interactions to be a combination of intermolecular potential energies and free energy due to packing of surfactant molecules in micelles.     

On how surfactant depletion during foam generation influences foam properties

Although it is known that foaming a surfactant solution results in a depletion of the surfactant in the bulk phase, this effect is often overlooked and has never been quantified. Therefore, the influence of surfactant depletion on foam properties using solutions of the two nonionic surfactants, n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (β-C(12)G(2)) and hexaethyleneglycol monododecyl ether (C(12)E(6)), were investigated. These investigations were conducted in two steps. First, different foam volumes were generated with the same surfactant solution at a concentration of c = 2 cmc. It was found that the higher the foam volume, the larger the surfactant depletion. Second, two different bulk concentrations (c = 2 and 1.33 cmc) were used for the generation of 50 and 110 mL of foam, respectively. For a foam volume of 50 mL, no differences were observed, whereas generating 110 mL led to different results. The surfactant loss in the bulk solution was measured via surface tension measurements and then compared to the results of purely geometric considerations that take into account the amount of interface created in the foam. Both results were in very good agreement, which means that surfactant depletion can be calculated in the way suggested here. Under conditions where depletion plays a role, our approach can also be used to estimate the bubble size of a foam of known volume by measuring the surfactant concentration in the bulk solution after foaming.     

Phase Behavior of Oleyl Oleate with Nonionic Surfactants

Oleyl oleate (OE), a liquid wax ester, has been reported as a potential raw material for cosmetic and pharmaceutical uses but little is known about its phase behavior in ternary systems. Two types of nonionic surfactants were selected, namely, Tween‐60 (T60) and Span 20 (S20). Phase diagrams of OE/T60/water and OE/S20/water systems were constructed at 25.0±0.5°C. Ternary phase diagrams of OE/T60∶S20 (20∶80 and 60∶40)/water systems were then constructed at the same temperature. The ratios of 80∶20 and 60∶40 of T60∶S20 were selected due to different solubility points of the surfactants in water. The results showed that the oleyl oleate with mixed surfactants system, OE/T60∶S20 (20∶80 and 60∶40)/water, gave better performance than the individual surfactant systems. The high percent of T60 of 80∶20 in the T60∶S20 system contributes to enlargement of the isotropic region. In contrast, by increasing the percent of S20 of 60∶40 in T60∶S20 contributes to a larger liquid crystalline region.     

Enhancing cellulase foam fractionation with addition of surfactant

Foam fractionation cannot be used to recover cellulase from an aerated water solution effectively because cellulase by itself can produce only a small amount of foam. The addition of a surfactant can, however, increase the foamate volume and enhance the concentration of cellulase. We studied three detergents individually added to a 200 mg/L cellulase solution to promote foaming. These detergents were anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants, respectively. Although contributing to foam production, it was observed that nonionic surfactant (Pluronic F-68) barely concentrated cellulase, leaving the enrichment ratio unchanged, near 1. With anionic surfactant, sodium dedecyl sulfate, and cationic surfactant, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), the enrichment ratio became much larger, but cellulase denaturation occurred, reducing the activity of the enzyme. When CTAB was used to help foam cellulase, β-cyclodextrin was subsequently added to the foamate to help restore the enzyme activity.     

Physicochemical properties of mixed surfacant systems: sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate with triton X 100

The physicochemical properties of a mixed surfactant system were studied under various conditions. The surfactants were anionic sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate and nonionic Triton X 100. Variation of specific conductivity with concentration was used to determine the critical micelle concentration of anionic as well as the mixed surfactants. Iodine solubilization method was used to determine the CMC of the nonionic surfactant. The interaction parameter between the surfactant molecules were calculated. The wetting, foaming and detergent properties of mixed surfactant systems were studied. The variation of contact angle of the solution with teflon surface as a function of surfactant concentration was found to be a reasonably good method to determine the critical micelle concentration. Viscosity and cloud points were also determined. All these quantities are discussed. Received: 14 January 1998 Accepted: 11 June 1998     

Surface properties of mixtures of surface-active sugar derivatives with ionic surfactants: theoretical and experimental investigations

Surface properties of systems that are mixtures of ionic surfactants and sugar derivatives-anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate and n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside (SDS/DM) and cationic surfactant dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide and n-dodecyl-beta-D-glucoside (DTABr/DG)-were investigated. The experimental results obtained from measurements of surface tension of mixtures with various ratio of ionic to nonionic components were analyzed by two independent theories. First is Motomura theory, derived from the Gibbs-Duhem equation, allowing for indirect evaluation of the composition of mixed monolayers and the Gibbs energies of adsorption, corresponding to mutual interaction between surfactants in mixed adsorbed film. As second theory we used our newly developed theoretical model of adsorption of ionic-nonionic surfactant mixtures. Using this approach, we were able to describe the experimental surface tension isotherms for mixtures of surface-active sugar derivatives and ionic surfactants. We obtained a good agreement with experimental data using the same set of model parameters for a whole range of studied compositions of a given surfactant mixture. The values of surface excess calculated from both theories agreed with each other with a reasonable accuracy. However, the newly developed model of adsorption of ionic-nonionic surfactant mixtures has the advantage of straightforward determination of surface layer composition. By the solution of equations of adsorption, one can obtain directly the values of surface excess of all components (surfactant ions, counterions, and nonionic surfactants molecules), which are present in the investigated system.     

Investigation on properties of aqueous foams stabilized by aliphatic alcohols and polypropylene glycol

Foams stabilized by nonionic surfactants are usually moderately stable due to high drainage rate and intense bubble coalescence and coarsening. This study aimed to investigate comparatively the foam properties of aliphatic alcohols (methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) and 2-octanol) and polypropylene glycol (PPG400). Experiments were conducted using the FoamScan method at various surfactant concentrations and gas flow rates where the foam volume, liquid content of foam and foam half-life were determined. The results showed that both foamability and foam stability of surfactant solution increased with increasing gas flow rate and surfactant concentration for all tested surfactants. PPG400 was an unusually strong surfactant having the largest surface activity compared with MIBC and 2-octanol, which exhibited the maximum foaming performance and foam stability at all tested gas flow rates and concentrations. The present study suggested that foam properties depended primarily on the type of surfactant and its concentration and secondarily on the gas flow rate. In addition, properties of interface are closely related to that of foam, which is a significant point if one wants to produce foams for specific applications.     

A disjoining pressure study of foam films stabilized by mixtures of nonionic and ionic surfactants

Studying the disjoining pressure Pi as a function of the film thickness h (Pi-h curves) of foam films stabilized by ionic and nonionic surfactants, one finds that the surface charge density q0 of films stabilized by ionic surfactants increases with increasing surfactant concentration, while the opposite holds true for nonionic surfactants. Thus, it should be possible to tune the surface charge density with mixtures of nonionic and ionic surfactants. To address this question, we studied foam films stabilized by aqueous solutions of surfactant mixtures. The mixtures consisted of the nonionic beta-dodecylmaltoside (beta-C12G2) and the cationic dodecyl trimethylammonium bromide (C12TAB) with mixing ratios of beta-C12G2/C12TAB = 1:0, 50:1, 1:1, 1:50, 0:1. The addition of small amounts of C12TAB to beta-C12G2 first neutralizes the negative surface charge of the beta-C12G2 films and finally leads to a charge reversal from negatively to positively charged surfaces. On the other hand, by adding small amounts of beta-C12G2 to C12TAB, one observes the formation of stable CBFs which was also observed for the pure C12TAB. However, in contrast to the pure C12TAB, the resulting Pi-h curves for the mixtures cannot be described with the Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory; the slope of the curves is too steep, and it barely changes with changing electrolyte concentration. A possible explanation for this observation will be given and discussed.     

Simultaneous quantitative trace analysis of anionic and nonionic surfactant mixtures by reversed-phase liquid chromatography

The aim of this work was to simultaneously analyse mixtures of a polydisperse polyethylene oxide (PEO) nonionic surfactant and an anionic surfactant (sodium dodecylsulphate, SDS) in water containing sodium chloride in order to quantify trace amounts of these mixtures after their adsorption at water-solid interfaces. A fractional factorial design was then used to optimise the separation by ion-pair reversed-phase liquid chromatography as a function of six factors: the chain length of the tetraalkylammonium salt used as ion-pairing reagent which varied from methyl (C1) to n-propyl (C3); the concentration of this ion-pairing salt; the acetonitrile percentage in water used as organic modifier; the flow-rate; the temperature of analysis and also the sodium chloride concentration. The factorial design enabled in a limited number of analyses, not only to determine which factors had significant effects on retention times or on resolution between a pair of nonionic oligomers, but also to modelize and then find the interesting and rugged area where this resolution was optimal as well as the conditions where time of analysis was not prohibitive. After optimisation of HPLC analysis, we used a trace enrichment procedure to quantify very low concentrations of SDS and C12E9 polydisperse PEO in water. A C18 cartridge and a strong anionic exchange cartridge were coupled and the conditions of elution were optimised in order to obtain concentrated samples which were injected in the same eluent than the HPLC mobile phase. Under such conditions, we were able to quantify, in a single run, mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants at concentrations as low as 3.6 microg l(-1) for SDS and 2.5 microg l(-1) for each PEO oligomer in water.