Synthesis of Poly(glycidyl Methacrylate-r-photochromic Monomer) by ATRP

The preparation of the random photochromic copolymer poly(glycidyl methacrylate-r-1′-(2-methacryloxyethyl)-6-nitro-3′,3′-dimethylspiro-[2H-1]-benzopyran-2,2′-indoline) by ATRP is reported, which can be used for the preparation of smart materials. Narrow homopolymers obtained from glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) are prepared when HMTETA-copper bromide and ethyl 2-methyl-2-bromo-propionate are used as the catalytic system with methyl-ethyl-ketone at 50°C. By using a molar ratio of 1:1 ligand:initiator, good correlations between experimental and theoretical molecular weights and narrow molecular weight distribution are obtained. These experimental conditions are also employed for the copolymerization of GMA with a photochromic monomer, where again good control of the polymerization reaction is obtained. The copolymer is fully characterized by spectroscopic techniques. The reactivity ratios are calculated according to the extended Kelen-Tüdos method, while the composition of the copolymer is calculated by NMR. Determination of r _GMA and r _PHM gives a value of 0.985 for GMA and 0.596 for the photochromic monomer.     

Low‐Temperature Growth of Thick Polystyrene Brushes via ATRP

Summary: This contribution describes the graft polymerization of polystyrene (PS) by atom transfer radical polymerization at 50, 60, and 75 °C. Thick PS brushes were grown from initiator‐functionalized PGMA layers on silicon, and constant growth rates provide indirect evidence that the polymerizations were controlled.

Formation of polystyrene brushes at T < T_g by ATRP of styrene from α‐bromoester initiator‐functionalized poly(glycidyl methacrylate) layers.     

Graft polymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate via ATRP with poly(acrylonitrile-co-p-chloromethyl styrene) as a macroinitiator

Amphiphilic graft copolymers are excellent additives for the development of antifouling membranes by nonsolvent induced phase separation. We report a convenient approach to the synthesis of novel graft copolymers with hydrophobic polyacrylonitrile (PAN) backbones and hydrophilic poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) side chains. Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate was carried out with poly(acrylonitrile-co-p-chloromethyl styrene) (PAN-co-PCMS) as a macroinitiator in the presence of CuCl/2,2’-bipyridine at 50 °C in dimethyl sulfoxide. Kinetics of the graft polymerization was also evaluated. The synthesis of poly(acrylonitrile-co-p-chloromethyl styrene-g-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PAN-co-(PCMS-g-PHEMA)) can be relatively controlled when CMS (the ATRP sites) unit in the macroinitiator is around 5 mol%. Both the macroinitiators and graft copolymers were characterized by FTIR, NMR and GPC. The surface morphology and wettability of the copolymer films were studied by AFM and water contact angle measurement, respectively. We demonstrate that phase segregation between the PAN-co-PCMS backbones and the PHEMA side chains takes place and the surface hydrophilicity of the graft copolymers increases with the length of the PHEMA side chains. Because these amphiphilic graft copolymers can be synthesized in mass, they will be useful as latent additives for the fabrication of advanced PAN separation membranes.     

Surface graft polymerization of glycidyl methacrylate onto polyethylene and the adhesion with epoxy resin

Surface graft polymerization of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) was carried out onto a high- density polyethylene (PE) sheet pretreated with corona to introduce peroxides onto the PE surface. Graft polymerization of GMA was effected by UV irradiation of the coronatreated PE in the presence of monomer solution without the use of any photosensitizer. The graft layer was found by staining the PE cross section to localize in the surface region of PE. The physical change in the PE surface was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, while the chemical changes due to the GMA graft polymerization were assessed by the dynamic contact angle, FT-IR, and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement. The peroxide formation by corona exposure was confirmed by the XPS measurement after derivatization with SO₂. The epoxy groups introduced onto the PE surface by the GMA graft polymerization were reactive with water (in the presence of HCI) and amines. The adhesion between the GMA-grafted PE and an epoxy resin was studied by means of a shear strength test method. The GMA-grafted PE exhibited strong interfacial adhesion with the epoxy resin, compared to the original and corona-treated PE. The adhesion strength of the GMA-grafted PE was nearly two times higher than that of the corona-treated PE. This strongly suggests that the enhanced adhesion between the surface-grafted PE and the epoxy resin is ascribed to covalent bonding of the epoxy groups on the GMA-grafted surface to the amines in the epoxy resin. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Grafting by in situ coupling of epoxy groups of a living copolymer with an anionic living polymer

A tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution of the living random copolymer of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) was prepared by the living anionic copolymerization of the two monomers, using 1,1‐diphenylhexyllithium (DPHLi) as initiator, in the presence of LiCl ([LiCl]/[DPHLi]₀ = 3), at −50°C. The copolymer thus obtained has a controlled composition and molecular weight and a narrow molecular weight distribution. By introduction of an anionic living polystyrene (poly(St)) or anionic living polyisoprene (poly(Is)) solution into the above system at −30°C, a coupling reaction took place and a graft copolymer with a polar backbone and nonpolar side chains was produced. The solvent used in the preparation of the living poly(St) or poly(Is) affects the coupling reaction. When benzene was the solvent, a graft copolymer of high purity, controlled graft number and molecular weight, and narrow molecular weight distribution (M_w/M_n = 1.11–1.21) was obtained. In the coupling reaction, the living poly(St) reacted only with the epoxy groups and not with the carbonyls of the backbone polymer. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 37: 105–112, 1999