Preparation of poly(ethylene oxide) star polymers and poly(ethylene oxide)–polystyrene heteroarm star polymers by atom transfer radical polymerization

Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) star polymer with a microgel core was prepared by atom transfer radical poylmerization (ATRP) of divinyl benzene (DVB) with mono‐2‐bromoisobutyryl PEO ester as a macroinitiator. Several factors, such as the feed ratio of DVB to the initiator, type of catalysts, and purity of DVB, play important roles during star formation. The crosslinked poly(divinyl benzene) (PDVB) core was further obtained by the hydrolysis of PEO star to remove PEO arms. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) traces revealed the bare core has a broad molecular weight distribution. PEO–polystyrene (PS) heteroarm star polymer was synthesized through grafting PS from the core of PEO star by another ATRP of styrene (St) because of the presence of initiating groups in the core inherited from PEO star. Characterizations by SEC, ¹H NMR, and DSC revealed the successful preparation of the target star copolymers. Scanning electron microscopy images suggested that PEO–PS heteroarm star can form spherical micelles in water/tetrahydrofuran mixture solvents, which further demonstrated the amphiphilic nature of the star polymer. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 2263–2271, 2004     

Preparation of Star‐Shaped ABC Copolymers of Polystyrene‐Poly(ethylene oxide)‐Polyglycidol Using Ethoxyethyl Glycidyl Ether as the Cap Molecule

The 3‐miktoarm star‐shaped ABC copolymers of polystyrene–poly(ethylene oxide)–poly(ethoxyethyl glycidyl ether) (PS‐PEO‐PEEGE) and polystyrene–poly(ethylene oxide)–polyglycidol (PS‐PEO‐PG) with low polydispersity indices (PDI ≤ 1.12) and controlled molecular weight were synthesized by a combination of anionic polymerization with ring‐opening polymerization. The polystyryl lithium (PS⁻Li⁺) was capped by EEGE firstly to form the functionalized polystyrene (PS_A) with both an active ω‐hydroxyl group and an ω′‐ethoxyethyl‐protected hydroxyl group, and then the PS‐b‐PEO block copolymers, star(PS‐PEO‐PEEGE) and star(PS‐PEO‐PG) copolymers were obtained by the ring‐opening polymerization of EO and EEGE respectively via the variation of the functional end group, and then the hydrolysis of the ethoxyethyl group on the PEEGE arm. The obtained star copolymers and intermediates were characterized by ¹H NMR spectroscopy and SEC.

     

Preparation of the amphiphilic macro‐rings of poly(ethylene oxide) with multi‐polystyrene lateral chains and their extraction for dyes

A novel method for synthesis of amphiphilic macrocyclic graft copolymers with multi‐polystyrene lateral chains is suggested, by combination of anionic ring‐open polymerization (AROP) with atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The anionic ring‐opening copolymerization of ethylene oxide (EO) and ethoxyethyl glycidyl ether (EEGE) was carried out first using triethylene glycol and diphenylmethylpotassium (DPMK) as coinitiators; the monomer reactivity ratio of them are r_1(EO) = 1.20 ± 0.01 and r_2(EEGE) = 0.76 ± 0.02 respectively. The obtained linear well‐defined α,ω‐dihydroxyl poly(ethylene oxide) with pendant protected hydroxylmethyls (l‐poly(EO‐co‐EEGE)) was cyclized by reaction with tosyl chloride (TsCl) in the presence of solid KOH. The crude cyclized product containing the extended linear chain polymer was hydrolyzed and then purified by treat with α‐CD. The pure cyclic copolymer with multipendant hydroxymethyls [c‐poly(EO‐co‐Gly)] was esterified by reaction with 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide, and then used as macroinitiators to initiate polymerization of styrene (St), and a series of amphiphilic macrocyclic grafted copolymers composed of a hydrophilic PEO as ring and hydrophobic polystyrene as side chains (c‐PEO‐g‐PS) were obtained. The intermediates and final products were characterized by GPC, NMR and MALDI‐TOF in detail. The experimental results confirmed that c‐PEO‐g‐PS shows stronger conjugation ability with the dyes than the corresponding comb‐PEO‐g‐PS. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 5824–5837, 2007     

Synthesis of a ‐shaped amphiphilic block copolymer by the combination of atom transfer radical polymerization and living anionic polymerization

The functionalization of monomer units in the form of macroinitiators in an orthogonal fashion yields more predictable macromolecular architectures and complex polymers. Therefore, a new ‐shaped amphiphilic block copolymer, (PMMA)₂–PEO–(PS)₂–PEO–(PMMA)₂ [where PMMA is poly(methyl methacrylate), PEO is poly (ethylene oxide), and PS is polystyrene], has been designed and successfully synthesized by the combination of atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and living anionic polymerization. The synthesis of meso‐2,3‐dibromosuccinic acid acetate/diethylene glycol was used to initiate the polymerization of styrene via ATRP to yield linear (HO)₂–PS₂ with two active hydroxyl groups by living anionic polymerization via diphenylmethylpotassium to initiate the polymerization of ethylene oxide. Afterwards, the synthesized miktoarm‐4 amphiphilic block copolymer, (HO–PEO)₂–PS₂, was esterified with 2,2‐dichloroacetyl chloride to form a macroinitiator that initiated the polymerization of methyl methacrylate via ATRP to prepare the ‐shaped amphiphilic block copolymer. The polymers were characterized with gel permeation chromatography and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 147–156, 2007     

Functional Polyolefins: Poly(ethylene)‐graft‐Poly(tert‐butyl acrylate) via Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization From a Polybrominated Alkane

Poly(cis‐cyclooctene) is synthesized via ring‐opening metathesis polymerization in the presence of a chain‐transfer agent and quantitatively hydrobrominated. Subsequent graft polymerization of tert‐butyl acrylate (tBA) via Cu‐catalyzed atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) from the non‐activated secondary alkyl bromide moieties finally results in PE‐g‐PtBA copolymer brushes. By varying the reaction conditions, a series of well‐defined graft copolymers with different graft densities and graft lengths are prepared. The maximum extent of grafting in terms of bromoalkyl groups involved is approximately 80 mol%. DSC measurements on the obtained graft copolymers reveal a decrease in T_m with increasing grafting density.     

Synthesis and characterization of ABA‐type amphiphilic tri‐block copolymers through anionic polymerization using end functionalized poly(ethylene oxide) oligomers

ABA‐type amphiphilic tri‐block copolymers were successfully synthesized from poly(ethylene oxide) derivatives through anionic polymerization. When poly(styrene) anions were reacted with telechelic bromine‐terminated poly(ethylene oxide) ( 1 ) in 2:1 mole ratio, poly(styrene)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(styrene) tri‐block copolymers were formed. Similarly, stable telechelic carbanion‐terminated poly(ethylene oxide), prepared from 1,1‐diphenylethylene‐terminated poly (ethylene oxide) ( 2 ) and sec‐BuLi, was also used to polymerize styrene and methyl methacrylate separately, as a result, poly (styrene)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(styrene) and poly (methyl methacrylate)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) tri‐block copolymers were formed respectively. All these tri‐block copolymers and poly(ethylene oxide) derivatives, 1 and 2 , were characterized by spectroscopic, calorimetric, and chromatographic techniques. Theoretical molecular weights of the tri‐block copolymers were found to be similar to the experimental molecular weights, and narrow polydispersity index was observed for all the tri‐block copolymers. Differential scanning calorimetric studies confirmed the presence of glass transition temperatures of poly(ethylene oxide), poly(styrene), and poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks in the tri‐block copolymers. Poly(styrene)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(styrene) tri‐block copolymers, prepared from polystyryl anion and 1 , were successfully used to prepare micelles, and according to the transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering results, the micelles were spherical in shape with mean average diameter of 106 ± 5 nm. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011     

Synthesis of dendrimer‐like copolymers based on the star[Polystyrene‐Poly(ethylene oxide)‐Poly(ethoxyethyl glycidyl ether)] terpolymers by click chemistry

The dendrimer‐like copolymers [PEEGE‐(PS/PEO)]_n (n ≥ 2) based on the star[Polystyrene‐Poly(ethylene oxide)‐Poly(ethoxyethyl glycidyl ether)] [star(PS‐PEO‐(PEEGE‐OH))] terpolymers were synthesized by click chemistry. First, the star‐shaped copolymers star[PS‐PEO‐(PEEGE‐Alkyne)] (also termed as [PEEGE‐(PS/PEO)]₁) were synthesized by the reaction of hydroxyl end group at PEEGE arm (on star[PS‐PEO‐(PEEGE‐OH)]) with propargyl bromide. Then, the small molecule 1,4‐diazidobutane (DAB) with two azide groups and pentaerythritol tetrakis (2‐azidoisobutyrate) (PTAB) with four azide groups were synthesized and reacted with [PEEGE‐(PS/PEO)]₁ by the click chemistry for dendrimer‐like [PEEGE‐(PS/PEO)]₂ and [PEEGE‐(PS/PEO)]₄, respectively. However, in the latter case, only the [PEEGE‐(PS/PEO)]₃ was formed as the main product because of the steric effect. The final dendrimer‐like [PEEGE‐(PS/PEO)]_n copolymers were characterized by SEC and ¹H‐NMR in detail. Comparing with the SEC of their precursor [PEEGE‐(PS/PEO)]₁, the curves of [PEEGE‐(PS/PEO)]₂ was shifted to the shorter elution time, while that of [PEEGE‐(PS/PEO)]_n (n ≥ 3) was shifted to the longer elution time, which was attributed to the different hydrodynamic volume derived from their separate structures and compositions in THF solution. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 4800–4810, 2009     

Synthesis of H‐shaped A3BA3 copolymer by methyl‐2‐nitrosopropane induced single electron transfer nitroxide radical coupling

Amphiphilic H‐shaped [poly(ethylene oxide)]₃‐polystyrene‐[poly(ethylene oxide)]₃(PEO₃‐PS‐PEO₃) copolymer was synthesized by 2‐methyl‐2‐nitrosopropane (MNP) induced single electron transfer nitroxide radical coupling (SETNRC) using PEO₃‐(PS‐Br) as a single precursor. First, the A₃B star‐shaped precursor PEO₃‐(PS‐Br) was synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using three‐arm star‐shaped PEO₃‐Br as macro‐initiator. Then, in the presence of Cu(I)Br/Me₆TREN, the bromide group at PS end was sequentially transferred into carbon‐centered radical by single electron transfer and then nitroxide radical by reacting with MNP in mixed solvents of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)/tetrahydrofuran (THF), and in situ generated nitroxide radical could again capture another carbon‐centered radical by fast SETNRC to form target PEO₃‐PS‐PEO₃ copolymer. The MNP induced SETNRC could reach to a high efficiency of 90% within 60 min. After the product PEO₃‐PS‐PEO₃ was cleaved by ascorbic acid, the SEC results showed that there was about 30% fraction of product formed by single electron transfer radical coupling (SETRC) between carbon‐centered radicals. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011     

Synthesis of poly(vinyl acetate)‐graft‐polystyrene by a combination of cobalt‐mediated radical polymerization and atom transfer radical polymerization

Vinyl acetate and vinyl chloroacetate were copolymerized in the presence of a bis(trifluoro‐2,4‐pentanedionato)cobalt(II) complex and 2,2′‐azobis(4‐methoxy‐2,4‐dimethylvaleronitrile) at 30 °C, forming a cobalt‐capped poly(vinyl acetate‐co‐vinyl chloroacetate). The addition of 2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1‐piperidinyloxy after a certain degree of copolymerization was reached afforded 2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1‐piperidinyloxy‐terminated poly(vinyl acetate‐co‐vinyl chloroacetate) (PVOAc–MI; number‐average molecular weight = 31,000, weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight = 1.24). A ¹H NMR study of the resulting PVOAc–MI revealed quantitative terminal 2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1‐piperidinyloxy functionality and the presence of 5.5 mol % vinyl chloroacetate in the copolymer. The atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of styrene (St) was studied with ethyl chloroacetate as a model initiator and five different Cu‐based catalysts. Catalysts with bis(2‐pyridylmethyl)octadecylamine (BPMODA) or tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine (TPMA) ligands provided the highest initiation efficiency and best control over the polymerization of St. The grafting‐from ATRP of St from PVOAc–MI catalyzed by copper complexes with BPMODA or TPMA ligands provided poly(vinyl acetate)‐graft‐polystyrene copolymers with relatively high polydispersity (>1.5) because of intermolecular coupling between growing polystyrene (PSt) grafts. After the hydrolysis of the graft copolymers, the cleaved PSt side chains had a monomodal molecular weight distribution with some tailing toward the lower number‐average molecular weight region because of termination. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 447–459, 2007     

Study on Synthesis of Star‐Shaped Poly(ethylene oxide) by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization

Star‐shaped poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) was prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) with a 2‐bromoisobutyryl PEO ester as a macroinitiator. Divinylbenzene (DVB) and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate were employed as the coupling reagents. Several factors pertinent to star polymer formation are: type of coupling reagents and solvents, feed ratio of DVB to the macroinitiator, and reaction time. These were studied and used to optimize the star formation process. The optimum yield of star polymer was ca. 90–98%.     

Synthesis of amphiphilic A2B star‐shaped copolymers of polystyrene‐b‐[poly(ethylene oxide)]2 via atom transfer nitroxide radical coupling

The amphiphilic A₂B star‐shaped copolymers of polystyrene‐b‐[poly(ethylene oxide)]₂ (PS‐b‐PEO₂) were synthesized via the combination of atom transfer nitroxide radical coupling (ATNRC) with ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) mechanisms. First, a novel V‐shaped 2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidine‐1‐oxyl‐PEO₂ (TEMPO‐PEO₂) with a TEMPO group at middle chain was obtained by ROP of ethylene oxdie monomers using 4‐(2,3‐dihydroxypropoxy)‐TEMPO and diphenylmethyl potassium as coinitiator. Then, the linear PS with a bromine end group (PS‐Br) was obtained by ATRP of styrene monomers using ethyl 2‐bromoisobutyrate as initiator. Finally, the copolymers of PS‐b‐PEO₂ were obtained by ATNRC between the TEMPO and bromide groups on TEMPO‐PEO₂ and PS‐Br, respectively. The structures of target copolymers and their precursors were all well‐defined by gel permeation chromatographic and nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H NMR). © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2012     

Poly[(R)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate)]/poly(styrene) blends compatibilized with the relevant block copolymer

A novel triblock copolymer PS–PHB–PS based on the microbial polyester Poly[(R)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate)] (PHB) and poly(styrene) (PS) was prepared to be used as compatibilizer for the corresponding PHB/PS blends. It was prepared in a three‐step procedure consisting of (i) transesterification reaction between ethylene glycol and a high‐molecular‐weight PHB, (ii) synthesis of bromo‐terminated PHB macroinitiator, and (iii) atom transfer radical polymerization polymerization of styrene initiated by the PHB‐based macroinitiator. Fourier transform infrared, gel permeation chromatography, ¹H‐, and ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopies were used to determine the molecular structure and/or end‐group functionalities at each step of the procedure. Although thermogravimetric analysis showed that the block copolymer underwent a stepwise thermal degradation and had better thermal stability than their respective homopolymers, differential scanning calorimetry displayed that the PHB block in the copolymer could not crystallize, and thus generating a total amorphous structure. Atomic force microscopy images indicated that the block copolymer was phase segregated in a well‐defined morphological structure with nanodomain size of ～40 nm. Contact angle measurements proved that the wettability properties of the block copolymer were in between those of the PHB and PS homopolymers. Blends analyzed for their morphology and thermal properties showed good miscibility and had well‐defined morphological features. Polymer blends exhibited lower crystallinity and decreased stiffness which was proportional to the amount of compatibilizer content in the blends. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2012     

AB2‐type amphiphilic block copolymers composed of poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) via single‐electron transfer living radical polymerization: Synthesis and characterization

Novel AB₂‐type amphiphilic block copolymers of poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide), PEG‐b‐(PNIPAM)₂, were successfully synthesized through single‐electron transfer living radical polymerization (SET‐LRP). A difunctional macroinitiator was prepared by esterification of 2,2‐dichloroacetyl chloride with poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether (PEG). The copolymers were obtained via the SET‐LRP of N‐isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) with CuCl/tris(2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl)amine (Me₆TREN) as catalytic system and DMF/H₂O (v/v = 3:1) mixture as solvent. The resulting copolymers were characterized by gel permeation chromatography and ¹H NMR. These block copolymers show controllable molecular weights and narrow molecular weight distributions (PDI < 1.15). Their phase transition temperatures and the corresponding enthalpy changes in aqueous solution were measured by differential scanning calorimetry. As a result, the phase transition temperature of PEG₄₄‐b‐(PNIPAM₅₅)₂ is similar to that in the case of PEG₄₄‐b‐PNIPAM₁₁₀; however, the corresponding enthalpy change is much lower, indicating the significant influence of the macromolecular architecture on the phase transition. This is the first study into the effect of macromolecular architecture on the phase transition using AB₂‐type amphiphilic block copolymer composed of PEG and PNIPAM. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 4420–4427, 2009     

Synthesis of new amphiphilic diblock copolymers containing poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(α‐olefin)

This article discusses an effective route to prepare amphiphilic diblock copolymers containing a poly(ethylene oxide) block and a polyolefin block that includes semicrystalline thermoplastics, such as polyethylene and syndiotactic polystyrene (s‐PS), and elastomers, such as poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐octene) and poly(ethylene‐co‐styrene) random copolymers. The broad choice of polyolefin blocks provides the amphiphilic copolymers with a wide range of thermal properties from high melting temperature ～270 °C to low glass‐transition temperature ～?60 °C. The chemistry involves two reaction steps, including the preparation of a borane group‐terminated polyolefin by the combination of a metallocene catalyst and a borane chain‐transfer agent as well as the interconversion of a borane terminal group to an anionic (? O^?K⁺) terminal group for the subsequent ring‐opening polymerization of ethylene oxide. The overall reaction process resembles a transformation from the metallocene polymerization of α‐olefins to the ring‐opening polymerization of ethylene oxide. The well‐defined reaction mechanisms in both steps provide the diblock copolymer with controlled molecular structure in terms of composition, molecular weight, moderate molecular weight distribution (M_w/M_n < 2.5), and absence of homopolymer. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 3416–3425, 2002     

Preparation of comb‐like copolymers with amphiphilic poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐polystyrene graft chains by combination of “graft from” and “graft onto” strategies

A novel method for preparation the comb‐like copolymers with amphihilic poly(ethylene oxide)‐block‐poly(styrene) (PEO‐b‐PS) graft chains by “graft from” and “graft onto” strategies were reported. The ring‐opening copolymerization of ethylene oxide (EO) and ethoxyethyl glycidyl ether (EEGE) was carried out first using α‐methoxyl‐ω‐hydroxyl‐poly(ethylene oxide) (mPEO) and diphenylmethyl potassium (DPMK) as coinitiation system, then the EEGE units on resulting linear copolymer mPEO‐b‐Poly(EO‐co‐EEGE) were hydrolyzed and the recovered hydroxyl groups were reacted with 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. The obtained macroinitiator mPEO‐b‐Poly(EO‐co‐BiBGE) can initiate the polymerization of styrene by ATRP via the “Graft from” strategy, and the comb‐like copolymers mPEO‐b‐[Poly(EO‐co‐Gly)‐g‐PS] were obtained. Afterwards, the TEMPO‐PEO was prepared by ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) of EO initiated by 4‐hydroxyl‐2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl piperdinyl‐oxy (HTEMPO) and DPMK, and then coupled with mPEO‐b‐[Poly(EO‐co‐Gly)‐g‐PS] by atom transfer nitroxide radical coupling reaction in the presence of cuprous bromide (CuBr)/N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) via “Graft onto” method. The comb‐like block copolymers mPEO‐b‐[Poly(EO‐co‐Gly)‐g‐(PS‐b‐PEO)] were obtained with high efficiency (≥90%). The final product and intermediates were characterized in detail. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 1930–1938, 2009     

Synthesis of amphiphilic block copolymer consisting of glycopolymer and poly(l‐lactide) and preparation of sugar‐coated polymer aggregates

The block glycopolymer, poly(2‐(α‐d ‐mannopyranosyloxy)ethyl methacrylate)‐b‐poly(l ‐lactide) (PManEMA‐b‐PLLA), was synthesized via a coupling approach. PLLA having an ethynyl group was successfully synthesized via ring‐opening polymerization using 2‐propyn‐1‐ol as an initiator. The ethynyl functionality of the resulting polymer was confirmed by MALDI‐TOF mass spectroscopy. In contrast, PManEMA having an azide group was prepared via AGET ATRP using 2‐azidopropyl 2‐bromo‐2‐methylpropanoate as an initiator. The azide functionality of the resulting polymer was confirmed by IR spectroscopy. The Cu(I)‐catalyzed 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition between PLLA and PManEMA was performed to afford PManEMA‐b‐PLLA. The block structure was confirmed by ¹H NMR spectroscopy and size exclusion chromatography. The aggregating properties of the block glycopolymer, PManEMA_16k‐b‐PLLA_6.4k (M _n,PManEMA = 16,000, M _n,PLLA = 6400) was examined by ¹H NMR spectroscopy, fluorometry using pyrene, and dynamic light scattering. The block glycopolymer formed complicated aggregates at concentrations above 21 mg·L^?1 in water. The d ‐mannose presenting property of the aggregates was also characterized by turbidimetric assay using concanavalin A. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55 , 395–403     

Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic copolymer of linear poly(ethylene oxide) linked with [poly(styrene‐co‐2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate)‐graft‐poly(ε‐caprolactone)] using sequential controlled polymerization

A well‐defined amphiphilic copolymer of ‐poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) linked with comb‐shaped [poly(styrene‐co‐2‐hydeoxyethyl methacrylate)‐graft‐poly(ε‐caprolactone)] (PEO‐b‐P(St‐co‐HEMA)‐g‐PCL) was successfully synthesized by combination of reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer polymerization (RAFT) with ring‐opening anionic polymerization and coordination–insertion ring‐opening polymerization (ROP). The α‐methoxy poly(ethylene oxide) (mPEO) with ω,3‐benzylsulfanylthiocarbonylsufanylpropionic acid (BSPA) end group (mPEO‐BSPA) was prepared by the reaction of mPEO with 3‐benzylsulfanylthiocarbonylsufanyl propionic acid chloride (BSPAC), and the reaction efficiency was close to 100%; then the mPEO‐BSPA was used as a macro‐RAFT agent for the copolymerization of styrene (St) and 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) using 2,2‐azobisisobutyronitrile as initiator. The molecular weight of copolymer PEO‐b‐P(St‐co‐HEMA) increased with the monomer conversion, but the molecular weight distribution was a little wide. The influence of molecular weight of macro‐RAFT agent on the polymerization procedure was discussed. The ROP of ε‐caprolactone was then completed by initiation of hydroxyl groups of the PEO‐b‐P(St‐co‐HEMA) precursors in the presence of stannous octoate (Sn(Oct)₂). Thus, the amphiphilic copolymer of linear PEO linked with comb‐like P(St‐co‐HEMA)‐g‐PCL was obtained. The final and intermediate products were characterized in detail by NMR, GPC, and UV. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 467–476, 2006     

Synthesis of amphiphilic copolymer brushes possessing alternating poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) grafts via a combination of ATRP and click chemistry

We report on the synthesis of well‐defined amphiphilic copolymer brushes possessing alternating poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) grafts, poly(PMMA‐alt‐PNIPAM), via a combination of atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and click reaction (Scheme 1 ). Firstly, the alternating copolymerization of N‐[2‐(2‐bromoisobutyryloxy)ethyl]maleimide (BIBEMI) with 4‐vinylbenzyl azide (VBA) affords poly(BIBEMI‐alt‐VBA). Bearing bromine and azide moieties arranged in an alternating manner, multifunctional poly(BIBEMI‐alt‐VBA) is capable of initiating ATRP and participating in click reaction. The subsequent ATRP of methyl methacrylate (MMA) using poly(BIBEMI‐alt‐VBA) as the macroinitiator leads to poly(PMMA‐alt‐VBA) copolymer brush. Finally, amphiphilic poly(PMMA‐alt‐PNIPAM) copolymer brush bearing alternating PMMA and PNIPAM grafts is synthesized via the click reaction of poly(PMMA‐alt‐VBA) with an excess of alkynyl‐terminated PNIPAM (alkynyl‐PNIPAM). The click coupling efficiency of PNIPAM grafts is determined to be ～80%. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis of poly(PMMA‐alt‐PNIPAM) reveals two glass transition temperatures (T_g). In aqueous solution, poly(PMMA‐alt‐PNIPAM) supramolecularly self‐assembles into spherical micelles consisting of PMMA cores and thermoresponsive PNIPAM coronas, which were characterized via a combination of temperature‐dependent optical transmittance, micro‐differential scanning calorimetry (micro‐DSC), dynamic and static laser light scattering (LLS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 2608–2619, 2009     

Y‐shaped diblock copolymer with epoxy‐based block of poly(glycidyl methacrylate): Synthesis,characterization, and its morphology study

A Y‐shaped diblock copolymer with a functional block poly(glycidyl methacrylate) was synthesized via the combination of enzymatic ring‐opening polymerization (eROP) and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The synthetic procedure involved eROP of ε‐caprolactone (ε‐CL) in the presence of biocatalyst Novozyme 435 and initiator 1H,1H,2H,2H‐perfluoro‐1‐octaoxy, subsequently the resulting poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) was converted to a macroinitiator by esterification of it with 2,2‐dichloro acetyl chloride, and finally the ATRP of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) was conducted at 60 °C with CuCl/2,2′‐bipyridine as the catalyst system. By this process, we obtained copolymers with a controlled molecular weight and a low polydispersity. The structure and composition of the obtained polymers were characterized by H NMR, GPC, and IR. Linear first‐order kinetics, linearly increased molecular weight with conversion, and low polydispersities were observed for the ATRP of GMA. The thermal properties of the copolymer were characterized by differential scanning calorimetry. The self‐assembly behavior of the Y‐shaped block copolymer was also investigated in different solvents and at different concentrations. The aggregates of various morphologies (spheres, worm‐like patterns, nanowell patterns, and dendritic patterns) were observed. It was found that solvents remarkably influenced the morphologies of the films spin‐coated from the corresponding solutions. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 5509–5526, 2009     

Synthesis of well‐defined amphiphilic graft copolymer bearing poly(2‐acryloyloxyethyl ferrocenecarboxylate) side chains via successive SET‐LRP and ATRP

A series of well‐defined ferrocene‐based amphiphilic graft copolymers, consisting of poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide)‐b‐poly(ethyl acrylate) (PNIPAM‐b‐PEA) backbone and poly(2‐acryloyloxyethyl ferrocenecarboxylate) (PAEFC) side chains, were synthesized by the combination of single‐electron‐transfer living radical polymerization (SET‐LRP) and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). A new ferrocene‐based monomer, 2‐(acryloyloxy)ethyl ferrocenecarboxylate (AEFC), was prepared first and it can be polymerized via ATRP in a controlled way using methyl 2‐bromopropionate as initiator and CuBr/PMDETA as catalytic system in DMF at 40 °C. PNIPAM‐b‐PEA backbone was synthesized by sequential SET‐LRP of NIPAM and HEA at 25 °C using CuCl/Me₆TREN as catalytic system followed by the transformation into the macroinitiator by treating the pendant hydroxyls with α‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. The targeted well‐defined graft copolymers with narrow molecular weight distributions (M_w/M_n < 1.20) were synthesized via ATRP of AEFC initiated by the macroinitiator. The electro‐chemical behaviors of PAEFC homopolymer and PNIPAM‐b‐(PEA‐g‐PAEFC) graft copolymer were studied by cyclic voltammetry. Micellar properties of PNIPAM‐b‐(PEA‐g‐PAEFC) were investigated by transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 4346–4357, 2009