Exploring the potential role of visual reasoning tasks among inexperienced solvers

The collective case study described herein explores solution approaches to a task requiring visual reasoning by students and teachers unfamiliar with such tasks. The context of this study is the teaching and learning of calculus in the Palestinian educational system. In the Palestinian mathematics curriculum the roles of visual displays rarely go beyond the illustrative and supplementary, while tasks which demand visual reasoning are absent. In the study, ten teachers and twelve secondary and first year university students were presented with a calculus problem, selected in an attempt to explore visual reasoning on the notions of function and its derivative and how it interrelates with conceptual reasoning. A construct named “visual inferential conceptual reasoning” was developed and implemented in order to analyze the responses. In addition, subjects’ reflections on the task, as well as their attitudes about possible uses of visual reasoning tasks in general, were collected and analyzed. Most participants faced initial difficulties of different kinds while solving the problem; however, in their solution processes various approaches were developed. Reflecting on these processes, subjects tended to agree that such tasks can promote and enhance conceptual understanding, and thus their incorporation in the curriculum would be beneficial.     

Problem solving heuristics,affect, and discrete mathematics

It has been suggested that activities in discrete mathematics allow a kind of new beginning for students and teachers. Students who have been “turned off” by traditional school mathematics, and teachers who have long ago routinized their instruction, can find in the domain of discrete mathematics opportunities for mathematical discovery and interesting, nonroutine problem solving. Sometimes formerly low-achieving students demonstrate mathematical abilities their teachers did not know they had. To take maximum advantage of these possibilities, it is important to know what kinds of thinking during problem solving can be naturally evoked by discrete mathematical situations—so that in developing a curriculum, the objectives can include pathways to desired mathematical reasoning processes. This article discusses some of these ways of thinking, with special attention to the idea of “modeling the general on the particular.” Some comments are also offered about students' possible affective pathways and structures.     

Predetermined accommodations with a standardized testing protocol: Examining two accommodation supports for developing fraction thinking in students with mathematical difficulties

This study examined the effects of two pre-determined accommodations that were provided in a standardized testing. The two accommodations were meant to help students with difficulties in mathematics (SDMs) engage in unit thinking, reasoning, and coordination and consequently improve their ability to process fraction tasks. 23 middle school SDMs took the following tests and were asked to explain their solutions: a baseline fraction test without any accommodation; an annotated test with bolded information and additional simplified explanations; and a warming- up test that involved whole-number multiplicative reasoning tasks followed by the baseline test. Results show that while SDMs were able to construct and coordinate fraction units to solve fraction problems when appropriate accommodations were provided, standardized assessment with a predetermined “one-size-fits -all” accommodation could not meet the specific needs of all students with mathematics learning difficulties.     

Types of reasoning required in university exams in mathematics

Empirical research shows that students often use reasoning founded on copying algorithms or recalling facts (imitative reasoning) when solving mathematical tasks. Research also indicate that a focus on this type of reasoning might weaken the students’ understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts. It is therefore important to study the types of reasoning students have to perform in order to solve exam tasks and pass exams. The purpose of this study is to examine what types of reasoning students taking introductory calculus courses are required to perform. Tasks from 16 exams produced at four different Swedish universities were analyzed and sorted into task classes. The analysis resulted in several examples of tasks demanding different types of mathematical reasoning. The results also show that about 70% of the tasks were solvable by imitative reasoning and that 15 of the exams could be passed using only imitative reasoning.     

The Tabular Mode: Not Just Another Way to Represent a Function

Understanding mathematical functions as systematic processes involving the covariation of related variables is foundational in learning mathematics. In this article, findings are reported from two investigations examining students' thinking processes with functions. The first study focused on seven middle school students' explorations with a dynamic physical model. Students were videotaped during the 20‐ to 45‐minute sessions occurring two or three times per week over a period of 2 months, and students' written work was collected. The second investigation included 19 preservice elementary and middle school teachers enrolled in a course focusing on a combination of mathematical content and pedagogy. Participants' written problem‐solving work and reflective writing were collected, and participants were individually interviewed in 50‐minute videotaped sessions. Results from both investigations indicated that students often relied on a table, or some variation of a table, as a cognitive link advancing the development of their reasoning about underlying function relationships.     

Analyzing students’ communication and representation of mathematical fluency during group tasks

Findings discussed in this paper are from a larger research project exploring mathematical fluency characteristics, and teacher noticing and interpreting of mathematical fluency. The current study involved students from seven primary classes (Kindergarten – Grade 6, N = 63 students) and investigated students’ written work samples and oral discussions as they collaborated in small groups to solve mathematical tasks. Students displayed mathematical fluency both orally and in written/drawn form. Certain aspects of mathematical fluency were easier to identify orally (adaptive reasoning) particularly for younger students and when students did not provide any written reasoning. Analyzing the oral responses was often needed to identify mathematical fluency beyond knowledge of a correct procedure (strategic competence). Findings suggested that the various representations students used were valuable for observing mathematical fluency. These results suggest that oral assessments as a means to understand and interpret students’ mathematical fluency are necessary.     

Middle school students’ proportional reasoning in real life contexts in the domain of geometry and measurement

The purpose of this study was to examine middle school students’ proportional reasoning, solution strategies and difficulties in real life contexts in the domain of geometry and measurement. The underlying reasons of the difficulties were investigated as well. Mixed research design was adopted for the aims of the study by collecting data through an achievement test from 935 sixth, seventh and eighth grade students. The achievement test included real life problems that required proportional reasoning, and were related to the measurement of length, perimeter, area and volume concepts. In addition, task-based interviews were conducted on 12 of these students to collect more comprehensive data and to support the findings of the achievement test. Findings revealed that although students were mostly successful in giving correct answers, their reasoning lacked a clear argument of the direct and indirect proportional relationships between the variables and that they approached the problems by superficial characteristics of the problems.     

Writing as a Tool to Demonstrate Mathematical Understanding

In this study, I examine how using a writers' workshop model in mathematics creates a space for students to write about their mathematical thinking and problem solving and how their writing impacts instruction. This case study of one classroom with one teacher spanned 6 weeks and included 18 implementations of an adapted version of the Writers' Workshop (WW) in a fourth‐grade mathematics class. On a biweekly basis, the data were reviewed and changes made to the model. The analysis of the students' writing revealed (a) their understandings and misunderstandings of the mathematical content, (b) their readiness for more challenging tasks, and (c) their connections to prior knowledge. Students used writing to demonstrate their understanding of mathematics and show their mathematical processes. In some cases, examining only the numerical work failed to illuminate the students' understanding, their writing provided deeper insight. Students recognized writing as a tool for learning; this was evident in interview responses.     

Characteristics of Second Graders' Mathematical Writing

This study compared the characteristics of second graders' mathematical writing between an intervention and comparison group. Two six‐week Project M2 units were implemented with students in the intervention group. The units position students to communicate in ways similar to mathematicians, including engaging in verbal discourse where they themselves make sense of the mathematics through discussion and debate, writing about their reasoning on an ongoing basis, and utilizing mathematical vocabulary while communicating in any medium. Students in the comparison group learned from the regular school curriculum. Students in both the intervention and comparison groups conveyed high and low levels of content knowledge as indicated in archived data from an open‐response end‐of‐the‐year assessment. A multivariate analysis of variance indicated several differences favoring the intervention group. Both the high‐ and low‐level intervention subgroups outperformed the comparison group in their ability to (a) provide reasoning, (b) attempt to use formal mathematical vocabulary, and (c) correctly use formal mathematical vocabulary in their writing. The low‐level intervention subgroup also outperformed the respective comparison subgroup in their use of (a) complete sentences and (b) linking words. There were no differences between groups in their attempt at writing and attempts at and usage of informal mathematical vocabulary.     

Outcomes of a service teaching module on ODEs for physics students

This paper reports on the first part of a multiphase research project that seeks to identify and address the difficulties encountered by physics students when studying differential equations. Differential equations are used extensively by undergraduate physics students, particularly in the advanced modules of their degree. It is, therefore, necessary that students develop conceptual understanding of differential equations in addition to procedural skills. We have investigated the difficulties encountered by third-year students at Dublin City University in an introductory differential equations module. We developed a survey to identify these difficulties and administered it to students who had recently completed the module. We found that students’ mathematical ability in relation to procedural competence is an issue in their study of differential equations, but not as severe an issue as their conceptual understanding. Mathematical competence alone is insufficient if we expect our students to be able to recognize the need for differential equations in a physical context and to be able to set up, solve and interpret the solutions of such equations. We discuss the implications of these results for the next stages of the research project.     

Analysis of proportional reasoning and misconceptions among students with mathematical learning disabilities

We investigated not only the effects of schema-based instruction (SBI) on the mathematical outcomes of seventh-grade students with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD), but also extended prior work to analyze students’ written explanations on open-ended items involving ratio and proportion situations—ratio, proportion, and percent of change problems— to understand the ability to reason about proportions and identify misconceptions. The sample of 338 students with MLD [scored below the 25th percentile on a proportional problem solving (PPS) pretest] was taken from Jitendra, Harwell, Im, et al. (2019), which randomly assigned classrooms to either the SBI or control condition. Students with MLD in SBI classrooms outperformed their counterparts in control classrooms on proportional problem solving and general mathematics problem solving. Similar results, favoring the SBI condition, were found on the open-ended items; however, overall mean scores across pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest were low. Findings provide evidence for the limited understanding of fractional representations of ratios and highlight students’ persistent use of numerical and additive reasoning in explaining their low performance on the open-ended items.     

Developing Student Understanding: Contextualizing Calculus Concepts

This study looked at the practice of one high school teacher who provided students with concrete examples from their physics class to give them a contextually rich environment in which to explore the abstractions of calculus. Students discovered connections between the physics concepts of position, velocity, and acceleration and the calculus concepts of function, derivative, and antiderivative. The qualitative study sought to describe several critical aspects of understanding: students' ability to explain concepts and procedures, to apply concepts in a physics context, and to explore their own learning. It included 32 seniors at a large, urban, comprehensive, religious school in a midwestern stale. Samples of student work and reflections were collected by the teacher, as well as by students in individual portfolios. The teacher kept a reflective journal. This study suggests that making connections between calculus and physics can yield deep understandings of semantic as well as procedural knowledge.     

High school students' use of representations in physics problem solving

Findings from physics education research strongly point to the critical need for teachers’ use of multiple representations in their instructional practices such as pictures, diagrams, written explanations, and mathematical expressions to enhance students' problem‐solving ability. In this study, we explored use of problem‐solving tasks for generating multiple representations as a scaffolding strategy in a high school modeling physics class. Through problem‐solving cognitive interviews with students, we investigated how a group of students responded to the tasks and how their use of such strategies affected their problem‐solving performance and use of representations as compared to students who did not receive explicit, scaffolded guidance to generate representations in solving similar problems. Aggregated data on students' problem‐solving performance and use of representations were collected from a set of 14 mechanics problems and triangulated with cognitive interviews. A higher percentage of students from the scaffolding group constructed visual representations in their problem‐solving solutions, while their use of other representations and problem‐solving performance did not differ with that of the comparison group. In addition, interviews revealed that students did not think that writing down physics concepts was necessary despite being encouraged to do so as a support strategy.     

Looking back to the roots of partially correct constructs: The case of the area model in probability

We use the notion Partially Correct Constructs (PaCCs) for students’ constructs that partially match the mathematical principles underlying the learning context. A frequent expression of partial construction of mathematical principles is that a student’s words or actions provide an inaccurate or misleading picture of the student’s knowledge. In this study, we analyze the learning process of a grade 8 student, who learns a topic in elementary probability. The student successfully accomplishes a sequence of several tasks without apparent difficulty. When working on a further task, which seems to require nothing beyond his proven competencies, he encounters difficulties. Using the epistemic actions of the RBC model for abstraction in context as tracers, we analyze his knowledge constructing processes while working on the previous tasks, and identify some of his constructs as PaCCs that are concealed in these processes and explain his later difficulties. In addition, our research points to the complexity of the knowledge structures students are expected to deal with in their attempts to learn an elementary mathematical topic with understanding.     

Student Strategies Suggesting Emergence of Mental Structures Supporting Logical and Abstract Thinking: Multiplicative Reasoning

For many students, developing mathematical reasoning can prove to be challenging. Such difficulty may be explained by a deficit in the core understanding of many arithmetical concepts taught in early school years. Multiplicative reasoning is one such concept that produces an essential foundation upon which higher‐level mathematical thinking skills are built. The purpose of this study is to recognize indicators of multiplicative reasoning among fourth‐grade students. Through cross‐case analysis, the researcher used a test instrument to observe patterns of multiplicative reasoning at varying levels in a sample of 14 math students from a low socioeconomic school. Results indicate that the participants fell into three categories: premultiplicative, emergent, and multiplier. Consequently, 12 new sublevels were developed that further describe the multiplicative thinking of these fourth graders within the categories mentioned. Rather than being provided the standard mathematical algorithms, students should be encouraged to personally develop their own unique explanations, formulas, and understanding of general number system mechanics. When instructors are aware of their students' distinctive methods of determining multiplicative reasoning strategies and multiplying schemes, they are more apt to provide the most appropriate learning environment for their students.     

Understanding and representing the arithmetic averaging algorithm: an analysis and comparison of US and Chinese students' responses

Analysing the responses of 311 sixth-grade Chinese students and 232 sixth-grade US students to two problems involving arithmetic average, this study explored students' understanding and representation of the averaging algorithm from a cross-national perspective. Results of the study show that Chinese students were more successful than US students in obtaining correct numerical answers to each of the problems, but US and Chinese students had similar cognitive difficulties in solving the second task. The difficulties were not due to their lack of procedural knowledge of the averaging algorithm, rather due to their lack of conceptual understanding of the algorithm. There were significant differences between the US and Chinese students in their solution representations of the two average problems. Chinese students were more likely to use algebraic representations than US students; while US students were more likely to use pictorial or verbal representations. US and Chinese students' use of representations are related to their mathematical problem-solving performance. Students who used more advanced representations were better problem solvers. The findings of the study suggest that Chinese students' superior performance on the averaging problems is partly due to their use of advanced representations (e.g. algebraic).     

Understanding the concepts of proportion and ratio among grade nine students in Malaysia

The purpose of the study was to investigate the concepts of ratio and proportion constructed by grade nine students by investigating grade nine students proportional reasoning schemes and procedures on three types of tasks: missing value, numerical comparison and qualitative reasoning. Comparisons among the different categories were made and the strategies used in solving these problems were identified. The relationship between student grades on a national examination and their knowledge of proportional reasoning was determined. The results of the quantitative analysis indicated that students performed generally well on the missing value tasks but their scores on the numerical comparison and qualitative tasks were much lower. The results indicate that only a small percentage of students who did well on the national exams were able to solve complex proportional problems and the grades obtained were not indicative of their knowledge of ratio and proportion. The difficulty experienced by the ninth graders indicated that students frequently used additive reasoning, that is a comparison of two numbers by subtraction rather than division. It appears that students cannot begin to understand the functional and scalar relationship inherent in a proportion until they first develop multiplicative reasoning.     

University Students' Reading of Their First-Year Mathematics Textbooks

This article reports the observed behaviors and difficulties that 11 precalculus and calculus students exhibited in reading new passages from their mathematics textbooks. To gauge the effectiveness of these students' reading, we asked them to attempt straightforward mathematical tasks, based directly on what they had just read. The students had high ACT mathematics and high ACT reading comprehension test scores and exhibited much of the Constructively Responsive Reading of good readers as described in the reading comprehension research literature. However, they were not effective readers of their mathematics textbooks. We discuss some reasons for this that might not be easily discernible among the variety of task-working difficulties of less able students. Finally, we pose questions for future research and suggest some implications for teaching.     

Assessments accompanying published textbooks: the extent to which mathematical processes are evident

Assessments accompanying published textbooks are often used by teachers in the USA as a primary means to evaluate students’ mathematical knowledge. In addition to assessing content knowledge, assessments should provide insight into students’ ability to engage with mathematical processes such as reasoning, communication, connections, and representations. We report here an analysis of the extent to which the assessments accompanying published textbooks in the USA at the elementary, middle grades, and high school levels provide opportunities for students to engage with these mathematical processes. Results indicate that in elementary grades, communication, connections, and graphics are not consistently emphasized across grade levels and publishers. In middle grades, students are rarely asked to record their reasoning or translate among representational forms of a concept. In high school geometry, students are given many opportunities to interpret and create graphics, but the same is not true for algebra. With the exception of connections, the results suggest that inconsistent emphasis is placed on the mathematical processes within assessments accompanying commercial textbooks in the USA.     

On recognizing proportionality: Does the ability to solve missing value proportional problems presuppose the conception of proportional reasoning?

This paper investigates the relationship between the ability of middle school students to solve missing value proportional problems and their facility in differentiating proportional relationships from non-proportional relationships. Students in low- and high-proficiency groups in mathematics took a ratio-and-proportion test involving two typical missing value proportional (MVP) and two recognizing proportionality (RP) problems. The findings revealed that while the students generally performed better on MVP problems than on RP problems, the two groups differed in their performance on MVP problems, but not on RP problems. Moreover, of those students from both the groups who successfully solved the two MVP problems, a significantly greater proportion of students in the high-proficiency group were unsuccessful in solving either of the two RP problems than those in the low-proficiency group. An analysis of performance differences between items within the same student group showed that the effect of differences in the structural components of RP problems to some extent contradicted the previous findings on the effect of differences in the structural components of MVP problems. It is hoped that these findings can shed light on what might be missing in the teaching and learning of proportional reasoning.