The Dirichlet problem for the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group,II

Let L = ∑_{j = 1}^mX_j² be sum of squares of vector fields in $\text{R}$ⁿ satisfying a Hörmander condition of order 2: span{X_j, [X_i, X_j]} is the full tangent space at each point. A point x??D of a smooth domain D is characteristic if X₁,…, X_m are all tangent to ?D at x. We prove sharp estimates in non-isotropic Lipschitz classes for the Dirichlet problem near (generic) isolated characteristic points in two special cases: (a) The Grushin operator $\text{?}{}^2\text{?x}{}^2\text{+ x}{}^2\text{?}{}^2\text{?t}{}^2$ in $\text{R}$². (b) The real part of the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group $\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(}\text{?}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ 2y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{)}{}^2\text{+ (}\text{?}\text{?y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? 2x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{)}{}^2$ in $\text{R}$^{2n + 1}. In contrast to non-characteristic points, C^∞ regularity may fail at a characteristic point. The precise order of regularity depends on the shape of ?D at x.     

The KMS condition and spectral passivity in group duality

Let (A, G, α) be a C¹-dynamical system, where G is abelian, and let φ be an invariant state. Suppose that there is a neighbourhood Ω of the identity in $\text{G}\text{?}$ and a finite constant κ such that $\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{φ(x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^1\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{) ? κ}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{φ(x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^1\text{)}$ whenever x_i lies in a spectral subspace $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$, where $\text{Ω}{}_1\text{+ … + Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{? Ω}$. This condition of complete spectral passivity, together with self-adjointness of the left kernel of φ, ensures that φ satisfies the KMS condition for some one-parameter subgroup of G.     

On Fourier transform of generalized Brownian functionals

Let $\text{(L}{}^2\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>B</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ and $\text{(L}{}^2\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>b</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ be the spaces of generalized Brownian functionals of the white noises ? and ?, respectively. A Fourier transform from $\text{(L}{}^2\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>B</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ into $\text{(L}{}^2\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>b</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ is defined by ??(?) = ∫$\text{S}$¹: exp[?i ∫_$\text{R}$?(t) ?(t) dt]: ${}_{\mathrm{<mtext>b</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}\text{?(}\text{B}\text{?}\text{) dμ(}\text{B}\text{?}$), where : :${}_{\mathrm{<mtext>b</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}$ denotes the renormalization with respect to ? and μ is the standard Gaussian measure on the space $\text{S}$¹ of tempered distributions. It is proved that the Fourier transform carries ?(t)-differentiation into multiplication by i?(t). The integral representation and the action of?? as a generalized Brownian functional are obtained. Some examples of Fourier transform are given.     

A trial phase function method for a class of λ-ω reaction-diffusion systems: Reduction to a Schrödinger type problem in an eigen sub-domain

The perturbed central force problem $\text{γ}{}_{\mathrm{xx}}\text{? ?}{}^2\text{γ}\text{a}\text{?}{}^2\text{+ γλ(γ) = 0, γ}\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{+ 2}\text{a}\text{?}\text{γ}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{+ γ[}\text{}\text{?}\text{gw(γ}{}^1\text{) ?}\text{}\text{?}\text{gw(γ)] = 0}$ arising from the λ-ω system

$\text{α}\text{αt}\text{C}{}_1\text{C}{}_2\text{=}\text{λ}\text{?ω}\text{ω}\text{λ}\text{C}{}_1\text{C}{}_2\text{+}\text{α}\text{αt}\text{C}{}_1\text{C}{}_2$

where $\text{c}{}_1\text{=}\text{γ}\text{(x)cosθ(x,t), c}{}_2\text{=}\text{γ}\text{(x)sinθ(x,t), θ = σt ? ?∝}{}^{\mathrm{x}}\text{a}\text{?}\text{(x′)dx′}\text{and}\text{ω = ?}\text{}\text{?}\text{gw(}\text{γ}\text{)}$ is considered for the class $\text{λ}\text{=}\text{}\text{?}\text{gw}\text{= 1 ? g(}\text{γ}\text{)}$. The resulting linear equation in $\text{γ(x), γ}{}_{\mathrm{xx}}\text{+ 2}\text{a}\text{?}\text{γ}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{+}\text{γ[α}{}^2\text{+}\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{?}\text{?}{}^2\text{a}\text{?}{}^2\text{] = 0}$ is solved with the aid of a class of trial phase functions $\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{(x)}$ generated by the unperturbed central force problem for the case g(γ) = γ². An application of the Liouville-Green approximation procedure reduces the system to a Schrödinger type boundary value problem in an eigen sub-domain. The analytical estimates for α are in reasonable agreement with the results of numerical integration of the nonlinear system. The eigenfunctions γ(x) display expected oscillatory behaviour inside an eigen sub-domain. The higher modes and the span of the most extended centre structure are estimated and interpreted in the context of WKBJ connection formula.     

Isospectral matrices and classical polynomials

The matrices of order n defined, in terms of the n arbitrary numbers x_j, by the formulae $\text{X=}\text{diag}\text{(x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{)}\text{and}\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{=δ}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{∑′}\text{l=1}\text{n}\text{(x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{l}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{+(1?δ}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{(x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$, are representations of the multiplicative operator ξ and of the differential operator d/dξ in a space spanned by the polynomials in ξ of degree less than n. This elementary fact implies a number of remarkable formulae involving these matrices, including novel representations of the classical polynomials.     

Temporal exponential decay for the Stark effect in atoms

Let $\text{H}{}_1\text{= ?∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{(Δ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{+ V(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)) + ∑}{}_{\mathrm{1\; ?\; i\; <j\; ?\; N}}\text{¦}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{, V(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{) = N ∝ ¦}\text{x}\text{?}\text{y}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{?(}\text{y}\text{)d}\text{y}$, with ? a normalized Gaussian. Suppose $\text{E}$ ≠ 0 and that $\text{H = H}{}_1\text{+}\text{E}\text{· (∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ has no eigenfunctions in L²($\text{R}$^3N. If H₁ψ = μψ with μ < infσ_ess(H₁), then (ψ, e^?itHψ) decays exponentially at a rate governed by the positions of the resonances of H.     

Spectral representation for Schrödinger operators with long-range potentials

A spectral representation for the self-adjoint Schrödinger operator H = ?Δ + V(x), x? R³, is obtained, where V(x) is a long-range potential: $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(1</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, grad $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(3</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, $\text{ΛV(x) = O(¦ x}\text{s}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?\delta }}\text{) (δ > 0), Λ}$ being the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the unit sphere Ω. Namely, we shall construct a unitary operator $\text{F}$ from PL₂(R³) onto $\text{L}{}_2\text{((0, ∞); L}{}_2\text{(Ω)), P}$ being the orthogonal projection onto the absolutely continuous subspace for H, such that for any Borel function α(λ),

$\text{(α(H)(Pf,g)=}\text{∫}\text{0}\text{∞}\text{(α(λ)(Ff)(λ),(Fg)(λ))L}{}_2\text{(ω) dλ}$

.     

Existence globale pour une classe d'équations d'ondes perturbées

In this paper we prove a global well-posedness result for the following Cauchy problem:

where the initial data $\text{(f,g)∈}\text{H}\text{?}{}^1\text{(}\text{R}{}^3\text{)×L}{}^2\text{(}\text{R}{}^3\text{)}$ are compactly supported, 1?α<5, $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t,x)∈L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{×}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{x}}{}^3\text{)}$, $\text{V(t,x)∈L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{;L}{}^3\text{(}\text{R}{}^3{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{))}$. To cite this article: N. Visciglia, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 338 (2004).     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

Singular perturbation problems for systems of partial differential equations of elliptic type

Elliptic boundary value problems for systems of nonlinear partial differential equations of the form $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x, u}{}_1\text{, u}{}_2\text{,…, u}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{, ?}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = ?}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x), x ? R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, i = 1(1)N, j, k = 1(1)n, p_i ? 0, ? being a small parameter, with Dirichlet boundary conditions are considered. It is supposed that a formal approximation Z is given which satisfies the boundary conditions and the differential equations upto the order χ(?) = o(1) in some norm. Then, using the theory of differential inequalities, it is shown that under certain conditions the difference between the exact solution u of the boundary value problem and the formal approximation Z, taken in the sense of a suitable norm, can be made small.     

On the normal form of a system of differential equations with nilpotent linear part

We consider prenormal forms associated to generic perturbations of the system $\text{x}\text{?}\text{=2y,}\text{y}\text{?}\text{=3x}{}^2$. It is known that they have a formal normal form $\text{x}\text{?}\text{=2y+2x}\text{Δ}{}^1\text{,}\text{y}\text{?}\text{=3x}{}^2\text{+3y}\text{Δ}{}^1$, where $\text{Δ}{}^1\text{=x+A}{}_0\text{(y}{}^2\text{?x}{}^3\text{)}$ [Differential Equations 158 (1) (1999) 152–173]. We show that the series A₀ and the normalizing transformations are divergent, but 1-summable. To cite this article: M. Canalis-Durand, R. Schäfke, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 336 (2003).     

The asymptotic equivalence of Bayes and maximum likelihood estimation

Let (X, $\text{A}$) be a measurable space, Θ ? $\text{R}$ an open interval and P_Ω ∥ $\text{A}$, Ω ? Θ, a family of probability measures fulfilling certain regularity conditions. Let $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ be the maximum likelihood estimate for the sample size n. Let λ be a prior distribution on Θ and let $\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>n,</mtext><mtext>x</mtext>}}$ be the posterior distribution for the sample size n given $\text{x}\text{? X}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$. $\text{L:}\text{Θ}\text{× Θ →}\text{R}$ denotes a loss function fulfilling certain regularity conditions and T_n denotes the Bayes estimate relative to λ and L for the sample size n. It is proved that for every compact K ? Θ there exists c_K ≥ 0 such that

This theorem improves results of Bickel and Yahav [3], and Ibragimov and Has'minskii [4], as far as the speed of convergence is concerned.     

Arnold's canonical matrices and the asymptotic simplification of ordinary differential equations

Let A(x,ε) be an n×n matrix function holomorphic for |x|?x₀, 0<ε?ε₀, and possessing, uniformly in x, an asymptotic expansion $\text{A(x,ε)?Σ}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{r=0}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{(x) ε}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$, as ε→0⁺. An invertible, holomorphic matrix function P(x,ε) with an asymptotic expansion $\text{P(x,ε)?Σ}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{r=0}}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{(x)ε}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$, as ε→0⁺, is constructed, such that the transformation y = P(x,ε)z takes the differential equation $\text{ε}{}^{\mathrm{h}}\text{dy}\text{dx}\text{= A(x,ε)y,h}$ a positive integer, into $\text{ε}{}^{\mathrm{h}}\text{dz}\text{dx}\text{= B(x,ε)z}$, where B(x,ε) is asymptotically equal, to all orders, to a matrix in a canonical form for holomorphic matrices due to V.I. Arnold.     

The existence,uniqueness, and instability of spherically symmetric solutions of a system of reaction—Diffusion equations

The system $\text{?x}\text{?t}\text{= Δx + F(x,y),}\text{?y}\text{?t}\text{= G(x,y)}$ is investigated, where x and y are scalar functions of time (t ? 0), and n space variables $\text{(ξ}{}_1\text{,…, ξ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{), Δx ≡ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{?}{}^2\text{x}\text{?ξ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2$, and F and G are nonlinear functions. Under certain hypotheses on F and G it is proved that there exists a unique spherically symmetric solution $\text{(x(r),y(r)),}\text{where}\text{r = (ξ}{}_1{}^2\text{+ … + ξ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^2\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$, which is bounded for r ? 0 and satisfies x(0) >x₀, y(0) > y₀, x′(0) = 0, y′(0) = 0, and x′ < 0, y′ > 0, ?r > 0. Thus, (x(r), y(r)) represents a time independent equilibrium solution of the system. Further, the linearization of the system restricted to spherically symmetric solutions, around (x(r), y(r)), has a unique positive eigenvalue. This is in contrast to the case n = 1 (i.e., one space dimension) in which zero is an eigenvalue. The uniqueness of the positive eigenvalue is used in the proof that the spherically symmetric solution described is unique.     

Canonical forms for linear systems

This paper considers canonical forms for the similarity action of Gl(n) on $\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}\text{={(A,B)∈}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{×}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{}}$:

$\text{Gl(n×∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}\text{→∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}$

,

$\text{(H,(A,B))?(HAH}{}^{-1}\text{,HB)}$

Those canonical forms are obtained as an application of a more general method to select canonical elements M_c in the orbits $\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}$ of a matrix group G acting on a set of matrices $\text{M}\text{?}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{l}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$. We define a total order (?) on $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{l}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$, different from the lexicographic order ^l? [0^l?x ? x <0, but $\text{0?x≠0 for x∈}\text{R}\text{]}$ and consider normalized $\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}$-elements with a minimal number of parameters:

$\text{min{}\text{M}\text{?}\text{∈}\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{:}\text{M}\text{?}\text{normalized}}$

It is shown that the row and column echelon forms, the Jordan canonical form, and “nice” control canonical forms for reachable (A,B)-pairs have a homogeneous interpretation as such (?)-minimal orbit elements. Moreover new canonical forms for the general action (?) are determined via this method.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

Barriers for uniformly elliptic equations and the exterior cone condition

We consider the mixed boundary value problem $\text{Au = f}\text{in}\text{Ω, B}{}_0\text{u = g}{}_0\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{, B}{}_1\text{u = g}{}_1\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$, where Ω is a bounded open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ whose boundary Γ is divided into disjoint open subsets Γ⁺ and Γ^? by an (n ? 2)-dimensional manifold ω in Γ. We assume A is a properly elliptic second order partial differential operator on $\text{Ω}$ and B_j, for j = 0, 1, is a normal jth order boundary operator satisfying the complementing condition with respect to A on $\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. The coefficients of the operators and Γ⁺, Γ^? and ω are all assumed arbitrarily smooth. As announced in [Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.83 (1977), 391–393] we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of the coefficients of the operators for the mixed boundary value problem to be well posed in Sobolev spaces. In fact, we construct an open subset $\text{T}$ of the reals such that, if $\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{= {u ? H}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(Ω): Au = 0}}$ then for $\text{s ? =}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{1), (B}{}_0\text{,B}{}_1\text{): D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{→ H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{) × H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{)}$ is a Fredholm operator if and only if s ∈$\text{T}$ . Moreover, $\text{T}$ = ?_xew$\text{T}$_x, where the sets $\text{T}$_x are determined algebraically by the coefficients of the operators at x. If n = 2, $\text{T}$_x is the set of all reals not congruent (modulo 1) to some exceptional value; if n = 3, $\text{T}$_x is either an open interval of length 1 or is empty; and finally, if n ? 4, $\text{T}$_x is an open interval of length 1.     

A comparison result related to Gauss measureUn résultat de comparaison relatif à la mesure de Gauss

In this paper we prove a comparison result for weak solutions to linear elliptic problems of the type

where $\text{Ω}$ is an open set of $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ (n?2), ?(x)=(2π)^?n/2exp(?|x|²/2), a_ij(x) are measurable functions such that a_ij(x)ξ_iξ_j??(x)|ξ|² a.e. $\text{x∈Ω}$, $\text{ξ∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ and f(x) is a measurable function taken in order to guarantee the existence of a solution $\text{u∈}\text{H}{}^1{}_0\text{(?,Ω)}$ of (1.1). We use the notion of rearrangement related to Gauss measure to compare u(x) with the solution of a problem of the same type, whose data are defined in a half-space and depend only on one variable. To cite this article: M.F. Betta et al., C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 334 (2002) 451–456.     

Square roots of elliptic operators

Consider an elliptic sesquilinear form defined on $\text{V}$ × $\text{V}$ by $\text{J[u, v] = ∫}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{}\text{?}\text{t6v}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{v}\text{?}\text{+ α}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{u}\text{}\text{?}\text{t6v}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ au}\text{v}\text{?}\text{dx}$, where $\text{V}$ is a closed subspace of $\text{H}{}^1\text{(Ω)}$ which contains $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$, Ω is a bounded Lipschitz domain in $\text{R}$ⁿ, $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{, a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{, α}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{, a ? L}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω),}\text{and Re}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{ζ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{ζ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? κ > 0}$ for all ζ?$\text{C}$ⁿ with ¦ζ¦ = 1. Let L be the operator with largest domain satisfying J[u, v] = (Lu, v) for all υ∈$\text{V}$. Then L + λI is a maximal accretive operator in $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$ for λ a sufficiently large real number. It is proved that $\text{(L + λI)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ is a bounded operator from $\text{V}$ to $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$ provided mild regularity of the coefficients is assumed. In addition it is shown that if the coefficients depend differentiably on a parameter t in an appropriate sense, then the corresponding square root operators also depend differentiably on t. The latter result is new even when the forms J are hermitian.     

Best pseudo-isolated Gerschgorin disks for Eigenvalues

Let A be an arbitrary n×n matrix, partitioned so that if A=[A_ij], then all submatrices A_ii are square. If x is a positive vector, it is well-known that $\text{G(}\text{x}\text{) =∪}{}^{\mathrm{N}}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}\text{G}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(}\text{x}\text{)}$, where

$\text{G}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(}\text{x}\text{) =}\text{z}\text{6(zI ? A}{}_{\mathrm{ii}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{6}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{?}\text{1}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{∑}\text{j = 1}\text{j ≠ i}\text{N}\text{`6A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{6x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$

, contains all the eigenvalues of A. The purpose of this paper is to give a new definition of the concept of an isolated subregion of G(x). An algorithm is given for obtaining the best such isolated subregion in a certain sense, and examples are given to show that tighter bounds for some eigenvalues of A may be obtained than with previous algorithms. For ease of computation, each subregion G_i(x) is replaced by the union of circular disks centered at the eigenvalues of A_ii.