A duality theorem on a pair of simultaneous functional equations

Given P and Q convex compact sets in R^kandR^s, respectively, and u a continuous real valued function on P × Q, we consider the following pair of dual problems: Problem I—Minimize ? so that ?: $\text{P × Q → R}\text{and}\text{? ?}\text{Cav}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{Vex}{}_{\mathrm{q}}\text{×}\text{max}\text{(u, ?)}$. Problem II—Maximize g so that g: P × Q → R and g ? Vex_q × Cav_pmin(u, g). Here Cav_p is the operation of concavification of a function with respect to the variable p?P (for each fixed q?Q). Similarly, Vex_q is the operation of convexification with respect to q?Q. Maximum and minimum are taken here in the partial ordering of pointwise comparison: $\text{? ? g}\text{means}\text{?(p, q) ? g(p, q) ?(p, q) ? P × Q}$. It is proved here that both problems have the same solution which is also the unique simultaneous solution of the following pair of functional equations: (i) $\text{? =}\text{Vex}{}_{\mathrm{q}}\text{max}\text{(u, ?)}$. (ii) $\text{? =}\text{Cav}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{min}\text{(u, ?)}$. The problem arises in game theory, but the proof here is purely analytical and makes no use of game-theoretical concepts.     

Convergence of convex integrals in Lp spaces

We consider functionals of the form: I_f(u) = ∝_Tf[t, u(t)]μ(dt), which are defined on spaces L^p(T, R^k), and we study for these functionals the properties of a convergence for which the conjugacy $\text{I}{}_{\mathrm{f}}\text{→ I}{}_{\mathrm{f1}}$ is a continuous operator.     

Construction of a recurrence relation for modified moments

In this paper we are constructing a recurrence relation of the form

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{r}\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(k)m}{}_{\mathrm{k+i}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f] = ω(k)}$

for integrals (called modified moments)

$\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f]df=}\text{∫}\text{?1}\text{1}\text{f(x)C}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(\lambda )}}\text{(x)dx (k = 0,1,…)}$

in which C_k^(λ) is the k-th Gegenbauer polynomial of order $\text{λ(λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}$, and f is a function satisfying the differential equation

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)f}{}^{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{(x) = p(x) (?1?x?1)}$

of order n, where p₀, p₁, …, p_n ? 0 are polynomials, and m_k^〈λ〉[p] is known for every k. We give three methods of construction of such a recurrence relation. The first of them (called Method I) is optimum in a certain sense.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

Periodic-type functionals and their extensions

Let Ω denote a simply connected domain in the complex plane and let $\text{K[Ω]}$ be the collection of all entire functions of exponential type whose Laplace transforms are analytic on Ω′, the complement of Ω with respect to the sphere. Define a sequence of functionals $\text{{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{}}\text{on}\text{K[Ω]}$ by $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(f) =}\text{1}\text{2πi}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{\Gamma }}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(ζ) F(ζ) dζ}$, where F denotes the Laplace transform of f, Γ ? Ω is a simple closed contour chosen so that F is analytic outside and on Ω, and g_n is analytic on Ω. The specific functionals considered by this paper are patterned after the Lidstone functions, L_2n(f) = f⁽²ⁿ⁾(0) and L_{2n + 1}(f) = f⁽²ⁿ⁾(1), in that their sequence of generating functions {g_n} are “periodic.” Set g_{pn + k}(ζ) = h_k(ζ) ζ^pn, where p is a positive integer and each h_k (k = 0, 1,…, p ? 1) is analytic on Ω. We find necessary and sufficient conditions for $\text{f ∈ k[Ω]}\text{with}\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(f) = 0 (n = 0, 1,…)}$. DeMar previously was able to find necessary conditions [7]. Next, we generalize {L_n} in several ways and find corresponding necessary and sufficient conditions.     

The construction of stationary two-dimensional Markoff fields with an application to quantum field theory

It is shown that if φ(f)  ∝_R^dφ(y) f(y) dy is a Markoff random field and X_α are multiplicative functionals of φ (with E(X_α) = 1) which converge locally in L₁, then there exists a locally Markoff random field $\text{φ}{}_1$ such that $\text{E(exp(iφ}{}_1\text{(f))) =}\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{E(X}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\alpha </mtext>}}\text{exp}\text{(iφ(φ)))}$. We choose φ to be the two-dimensional generalization of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck velocity process and take X_α proportional to exp(?λ∝_R² : P(φ(y)) : g_α(y) dy), where: P(φ(y)) : is a regularized even degree polynomial in φ(y). It is then proved that for an appropriate choice of g_α → 1 and small λ, {X_α} does converge locally in L₁ and that the corresponding $\text{φ}{}_1$ is stationary.     

On the probability that k positive integers are relatively prime II

Given a set S of positive integers let $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t)}$ denote the number of k-tuples 〈m₁, …, m_k〉 for which $\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{∈ S ? [1, t]}$ and (m₁, …, m_k) = 1. Also let $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n)}$ denote the probability that k integers, chosen at random from $\text{S ? [1, n]}$, are relatively prime. It is shown that if P = {p₁, …, p_r} is a finite set of primes and S = {m : (m, p₁ … p_r) = 1}, then $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{\nu ?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + O(t}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{)}$ if k ≥ 3 and $\text{Z}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^2\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^2\text{) + O(t}\text{log}\text{t)}$ where d(S) denotes the natural density of S. From this result it follows immediately that $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = (ζ(k))}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p\in P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ as n → ∞. This result generalizes an earlier result of the author's where $\text{P = ?}$ and S is then the whole set of positive integers. It is also shown that if S = {p₁^x₁ … p_r^x_r : x_i = 0, 1, 2,…}, then $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → 0}$ as n → ∞.     

Existence and boundedness of solutions of abstract nonlinear integrodifferential equations of nonconvolution type

Existence and boundedness theorems are given for solutions of nonlinear integrodifferential equations of type $\text{d}\text{dt}\text{u(t) + Bu(t) + ∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t, s) Au(s) ds ? f(t) (t > 0)}$, (1.1) u(0) = u₀, Here A and B are nonlinear, possibly multivalued, operators on a Banach space W and a Hilbert space H, where W ? H. The function f (0, ∞) → H and the kernel a(t, s): $\text{R}$ × $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$ are known functions. The results of this paper extend the results of Crandall, Londen, and Nohel [4] for equation (1.1). They assumed the kernel to be of the type a(t, s) = a(t ? s). We relax this assumption and obtain similar results. Examples of kernels satisfying the conditions we require are given in section 4.     

About some problems of spectral synthesis

For a given pair $\text{(A,b)∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times n}}\text{×}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times 1}}$ such that A is cyclic and b is a cyclic generator (with respect to A) of $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times 1}}$, it is shown that for every nonnegative integer m we can find a nonnegative integer t and a sequence $\text{{f}{}_{\mathrm{j\}}}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{j=0}}\text{,f}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{1\times n}}$,so that a the zeros of the rational function det P(z), where $\text{P(z) = zI ? A ? ∑}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{j=0}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{-(m+j)}}\text{b?}$_f, lie in the open unit disc in the complex plane. The result is directly applicable to a stabilizability problem for linear systems with a time delay in control action.     

Asymptotic behavior of nonoscillatory solutions of nonlinear differential equations with retarded arguments

For nonlinear retarded differential equations $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{2n}}\text{(t)?}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t,y(t),y(g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)))=0}$ and $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(t)?}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)F}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(y(g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)))=h(t),}$ the sufficient conditions are given on f_i, p_i, F_i, and h under which every bounded nonoscillatory solution of (${}^1$) or (${}^7$) tends to zero as t → ∞.     

On the probability that given polynomials have a specified highest common factor

The polynomial functions f₁, f₂,…, f_m are found to have highest common factor h for a set of values of the variables x₁, x₂,…,x_m whose asymptotic density is

$\text{1}\text{h}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∑}\text{d∣h}\text{μ(d)Π}{}^{\mathrm{m}}{}_{\mathrm{l\; =\; 1}}\text{?(f}{}_1\text{, dh)}\text{d}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{Π}\text{p∣h}\text{1?}\text{Π}{}^{\mathrm{m}}{}_{\mathrm{l\; =\; 1}}\text{?(f}{}_1\text{, p)}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$

For the special case f₁(x) = f₂(x) = … = f_m(x) = x and h = 1 the above formula reduces to $\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{) =}\text{1}\text{ζ}\text{(m)}$, the density if m-tuples with highest common factor 1. Necessary and sufficient conditions on the polynomials f₁, f₂,…, f_m for the asymptotic density to be zero are found. In particular it is shown that either the polynomials may never have highest common factor h or else h is the highest common factor infinitely often and in fact with positive density.     

Asymptotic stability of some quasilinear parabolic equations in divergence form. L∞ results

In this paper we study the behavior of solutions of some quasilinear parabolic equations of the form

$\text{(}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{) ?}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{(}\text{d}\text{dx}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{) a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x, t, u, u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{) + a(x, t, u, u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{)u + f(x, t) = O,}$

as t → ∞. In particular, the solutions of these equations will decay to zero as t → ∞ in the L^∞ norm.     

Measuring flatness in linear spaces

Let L be a finite-dimensional normed linear space and let M be a compact subset of L lying on one side of a hyperplane through 0. A measure of flatness for M is the number $\text{D(M) =}\text{inf}\text{{}\text{sup}\text{f(x)}\text{f(y)}\text{: x, y ? M}}$, where the infimum is over all f in $\text{L}{}^1$ which are positive on M. Thus D(M) = 1 if M is flat, but otherwise D(M) > 1. On the other hand, let E(M) be a second measure on M defined as follows: If M is linearly independent, E(M) = 1. If M is linearly dependent, then (1) let Z be a minimal, linearly dependent subset of M; (2) partition Z into mutually exclusive subsets U = {u₁, …, u_p} and V = {v₁, …, v_q} such that there exist positive coefficients a_i and b_i for which Σ_{i = 1}^pa_iu_i = Σ_{i = 1}^qb_iv_i; (3) let $\text{r =}\text{max}\text{{}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{q}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{,}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{q}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{}}$; (4) let E(M) be the supremum of all ratios r which can be formed by steps (1), (2) and (3). The main result of this paper is that these two measures are the same: D(M) = E(M). This result is then used to obtain results concerning the Banach distance-coefficient between an arbitrary finite-dimensional normed linear space and Hilbert space.     

Abstract equipartition of energy theorems

Let H be a self-adjoint operator on a complex Hilbert space $\text{H}$. The solution of the abstract Schrödinger equation $\text{idu}\text{dt}\text{= Hu}$ is given by u(t) = exp(?itH)u(0). The energy E = ∥u(t)∥² is independent of t. When does the energy break up into different kinds of energy E = ∑_{j = 1}^NE_j(t) which become asymptotically equipartitioned ? (That is, $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(t) →}\text{E}\text{N}\text{as}\text{t → ± ∞}$ for all j and all data u(0).) The “classical” case is the abstract wave equation $\text{d}{}^2\text{v}\text{dt}{}^2\text{+ A}{}^2\text{v = 0}\text{with}\text{A}$ self-adjoint on $\text{H}$₁. This becomes a Schrödinger equation in a Hilbert space $\text{H}$ (essentially $\text{H}$ is two copies of $\text{H}$₁), and there are two kinds of associated energy, viz., kinetic and potential. Two kinds of results are obtained. (1) Equipartition of energy is related to the C¹-algebra approach to quantum field theory and statistical mechanics. (2) Let A₁,…, A_N be commuting self-adjoint operators with N = 2 or 4. Then the equation $\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{(}\text{d}\text{dt}\text{? iA}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{) u(t) = 0}$ admits equipartition of energy if and only if exp(it(A_j ? A_k)) → 0 in the weak operator topology as t → ± ∞ for j ≠ k.     

Sharp nonlogarithmic Kneser theorems for fourth-order elliptic equations

Let D(?) be the Doob's class containing all functions f(z) analytic in the unit disk Δ such that f(0) = 0 and lim $\text{inf}\text{¦f(z) ¦ ? 1}$ on an arc A of ?Δ with length $\text{¦A ¦? ?}$. It is first proved that if f?D(?) then the spherical norm ∥ f ∥ = sup_z?Δ$\text{(}\text{1 ? ¦z¦}{}^2\text{)¦f′(z)¦}\text{(1 + ¦f(z)¦}{}^2\text{) ? C}{}_1\text{sin}\text{(π ? (}\text{?}\text{2}\text{))/ (π ? (}\text{g9}\text{2}\text{))}$, where C₁ = lim_n→∞$\text{∥ z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}\text{and}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< C}{}_1\text{<}\text{2}\text{e}$. Next, U represents the Seidel's class containing all non-constant functions f(z) bounded analytic in Δ such that $\text{¦tf(e}{}^{\mathrm{i0}}\text{)¦ = 1}$ almost everywhere. It is proved that inf_f?U∥f∥ = 0, and if f has either no singularities or only isolated singularities on ?Δ, then ∥f∥ ? C₁. Finally, it is proved that if f is a function normal in Δ, namely, the norm ∥f∥< ∞, then we have the sharp estimate ∥f^p∥ ? p∥f∥, for any positive integer p.     

On an estimate for Bloch and Doob norm and covering problem in Doob's class

For any fixed 0 < π ? 2π, let D(π) be the family of all holomorphic functions in the unit disk Δ which satisfy (i)f(0) = 0 and (ii) $\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{z\; \to \; \pi ¦f(z)¦\; ?\; 1}}$, for all π lying on some arc A_f ? ?Δ with arclength $\text{¦A}{}_{\mathrm{f}}\text{¦ ? π}$. We show that for each 0 < ε < 1, there is a π₀ > 0 such that for any f?D(π) with π < π₀, the Bloch and Doob norm respectively satisfy

$\text{6f6}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{=}\text{sup}\text{z?Δ}\text{|f′(z)| (1?|z|}{}^2\text{) > 2(1 ? ε)}\text{log}\text{1+}\text{cos}\text{(}\text{p}\text{2}\text{1?}\text{cos}\text{(}\text{p}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$

$\text{6f6}{}_{\mathrm{D}}\text{=}\text{sup}\text{z?Δ}\text{|f′(z)| (1?|z|) > (1 ? ε)}\text{log}\text{1}\text{1?}\text{cos}\text{(}\text{p}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$

These two estimates do not hold with ε = 0.     

Factorization of fredholm operators on analytic functions

Let Ω be a simply connected domain in the complex plane, and $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, the space of functions which are defined and analytic on $\text{Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, if K is the operator on elements $\text{u(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{of}\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of the kernels k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by is the identity operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, then the operator I ? K may be factored in the form (I ? K)(M ? W) = (I ? ΠK)(M ? ΠW). Here, W is an operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of a kernel w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by Wu = ∝_an^tw(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠW is the operator; ΠWu = ∝_{an ? 1}w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠK is the operator; ΠKu = ∑_{i = 1}^{n ? 1} ∝_ai^tk_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) ds + ∝_{an ? 1}^tk_n(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. The operator M is of the form m(t, a₁, …, a_n)I, where $\text{m ? A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ and maps elements of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ into itself by multiplication. The function m is uniquely derived from K in the following manner. The operator K defines an operator $\text{K}{}^1$ on functions u in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$, by . A determinant $\text{δ(I ? K}{}^1\text{)}$ of the operator $\text{I ? K}{}^1$ is defined as an element $\text{m}{}^1\text{(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$. This is mapped into $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ by setting a_{n + 1} = t to give m(t, a₁, …, a_n). The operator I ? ΠK may be factored in similar fashion, giving rise to a chain factorization of I ? K. In some cases all the matrix kernels k_i defining K are separable in the sense that k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) = P_i(t, a₁, …, a_n) Q_i(s, a₁, …, a_n), where P_i is a 1 × p_i matrix and Q_i is a p_i × 1 matrix, each with elements in $\text{A(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, explicit formulas are given for the kernels of the factors W. The various results are stated in a form allowing immediate extension to the vector-matrix case.     

Existence of stable equilibrium point for dynamical systems of Volterra type

This paper presents sufficient conditions for the existence of a nonnegative and stable equilibrium point of a dynamical system of Volterra type, (1) $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dt}\text{) x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t) = ?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)[f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x}{}_1\text{(t),…, x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(t)) ? q}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{], i = 1,…, n}$, for every q = (q₁,…, q_n)^T?Rⁿ. Results of a nonlinear complementarity problem are applied to obtain the conditions. System (1) has a nonnegative and stable equilibrium point if (i) f(x) = (f₁(x),…,f_n(x))^T is a continuous and differentiable M-function and it satisfies a certain surjectivity property, or (ii), f(x) is continuous and strongly monotone on R₊₀ⁿ.     

The minimal generating space of a polynomial

Given a polynomial $\text{P(X}{}_1\text{,…,X}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{)∈}\text{R}\text{[}\text{X}\text{]}$, we calculate a subspace G_p of the linear space 〈X〉 generated by the indeterminates which is minimal with respect to the property $\text{P∈}\text{R}\text{[}\text{G}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{]}$ (the algebra generated by G_p, and prove its uniqueness. Furthermore, we use this result to characterize the pairs (P,Q) of polynomials P(X₁,…,X_n) and Q(X₁,…,X_n) for which there exists an isomorphism T:〈X〉 →〈X〉 that “separates P from Q,” i.e., such that for some k(1<k<n) we can write P and Q as $\text{P}{}^1\text{(Y}{}_1\text{,…,Y}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}$ and $\text{Q}{}^1\text{(Y}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>k+</mtext><mtext>1</mtext>}}\text{,…,Y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ respectively, where $\text{Y}\text{=T}\text{X}$.     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.