The cocrystal rac‐1‐[(N,4‐dimethylbenzenesulfonamido)methyl]‐2‐(diphenylphosphoryl)ferrocene–rac‐1‐[(N,4‐dimethylbenzenesulfonamido)methyl]‐2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ferrocene (0.45/0.55)

As part of our interest in the synthesis and catalytic applications of chiral (diphenylphosphanyl)ferrocene ligands, we designed a number of P,N‐containing ligands for use in asymmetric transfer hydrogenation (ATH). During the synthetic procedure to obtain rac‐1‐[(N,4‐dimethylbenzenesulfonamido)methyl]‐2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ferrocene, the title compound, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₆H₂₅NO₂PS)]_0.55·[Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₆H₂₅NO₃PS)]_0.45, was obtained as a by‐product. It is composed of a ferrocene group disubstituted by a partially oxidized diphenylphosphanyl group, as confirmed by ³¹P NMR analysis, and an (N,4‐dimethylbenzenesulfonamido)methyl substituent. Owing to the partially oxidized diphenylphosphanyl group, it is best to view the crystal as being composed of a mixture of non‐oxidized and oxidized phosphane, so it can be regarded as a cocrystal. It is also a racemate. To the best of our knowledge, the P=O distance [1.344 (4) Å] is the shortest observed for related (diphenylphosphoryl)ferrocene compounds. The packing is stabilized by weak C—H...O interactions, forming R₂²(10) hydrogen‐bonding motifs, which build up a chain along the c axis.     

Three new enanti­omerically pure ferrocenylphosphole compounds

The absolute configurations of three new enanti­omerically pure ferrocenylphosphole compounds, namely (2S,4S,S_Fc)‐4‐methoxy­methyl‐2‐[2‐(9‐thioxo‐9λ⁵‐phosphafluoren‐9‐yl)­ferro­cenyl]‐1,3‐dioxane, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₃H₂₂O₃PS)], (III), (S_Fc)‐[2‐(9‐thioxo‐9λ⁵‐phosphafluoren‐9‐yl)ferrocenyl]methanol, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₈H₁₄OPS)], (V), and (S_Fc)‐diphenyl[2‐(9‐thioxo‐9λ⁵‐phosphafluoren‐9‐yl]ferrocenylmethyl]phosphine, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₃₀H₂₃P₂)], (VIII), have been unambiguously established. All three ligands contain a planar chiral ferrocene group, bearing a dibenzo­phos­phole and either a dioxane, a methanol or a diphenyl­phosphino­methane group on the same cyclopentadienyl. In compound (V), the occurrence of O—H⋯S and C—H⋯S hydrogen bonds results in the formation of a two‐dimensional network parallel to (001). The geometry of the ferrocene frameworks agrees with related reported structures.     

An Efficient Synthesis of 14‐Aryl or Alkyl‐14H‐Dibenzo[a. j]Xanthenes Using Reusable HBF4‐SiO2 Catalyst Under Thermal and Solvent‐Free Conditions

A simple and convenient procedure for the synthesis of 14‐aryl or alkyl‐14H‐dibenzo[a. j]xanthene derivatives is described through a one‐pot condensation of β‐naphthol with various aryl or alkyl aldehydes in the presence of HBF₄‐SiO₂ as the catalyst under thermal and solvent‐free conditions.     

Charge‐assisted N—H·I and C—H·I hydrogen bonding in (1R,2S)‐1‐(ferrocenylmethyl)‐2‐(methoxymethyl)pyrrolidinium iodide

In the title compound, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₂H₁₉NO)]I, the ferrocene moiety has an eclipsed conformation, with mean Fe—C bond lengths of 2.031 (4) and 2.020 (6) Å for the substituted and unsubstituted cyclo­penta­dienyl rings. The pyrrolidinium heterocycle adopts an envelope conformation and has its 1‐ and 2‐substituents in a relative trans disposition. Strong (+/−)‐charge‐assisted N—H·I and C—H·I hydrogen bonds are present. The crystal structure is also stabilized by weak C—H·O interactions.     

Comparative Studies of Thermally Induced Homolytic CarbonCarbon Bond Cleavage Reactions of Strained Dicarba[2]ferrocenophanes and Their Ring‐Opened Oligomers and Polymers

Reactivity studies of dicarba[2]ferrocenophanes and also their corresponding ring‐opened oligomers and polymers have been conducted in order to provide mechanistic insight into the processes that occur under the conditions of their thermal ring‐opening polymerisation (ROP) (300 °C). Thermolysis of dicarba[2]ferrocenophane rac‐[Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CHPh)₂] (rac‐ 14 ; 300 °C, 1 h) does not lead to thermal ROP. To investigate this system further, rac‐ 14 was heated in the presence of an excess of cyclopentadienyl anion, to mimic the postulated propagating sites for thermally polymerisable analogues. This afforded acyclic [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)‐CH₂Ph] ( 17 ) through cleavage of both a Fe?Cp bond and also the C?C bond derived from the dicarba bridge. Evidence supporting a potential homolytic C?C bond cleavage pathway that occurs in the absence of ring‐strain was provided through thermolysis of an acyclic analogue of rac‐ 14 , namely [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(CHPh)₂‐C₅H₅] ( 15 ; 300 °C, 1 h), which also afforded ferrocene derivative 17 . This reactivity pathway appears general for post‐ROP species bearing phenyl substituents on adjacent carbons, and consequently was also observed during the thermolysis of linear polyferrocenylethylene [Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CHPh)₂]_n ( 16 ; 300 °C, 1 h), which was prepared by photocontrolled ROP of rac‐ 14 at 5 °C. This afforded ferrocene derivative [Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄CH₂Ph)₂] ( 23 ) through selective cleavage of the ?H(Ph)C?C(Ph)H? bonds in the dicarba linkers. These processes appear to be facilitated by the presence of bulky, radical‐stabilising phenyl substituents on each carbon of the linker, as demonstrated through the contrasting thermal properties of unsubstituted linear trimer [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(CH₂)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(CH₂)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] ( 29 ) with a ?H₂C?CH₂? spacer, which proved significantly more stable under analogous conditions. Evidence for the radical intermediates formed through C?C bond cleavage was detected through high‐resolution mass spectrometric analysis of co‐thermolysis reactions involving rac‐ 14 and 15 (300 °C, 1 h), which indicated the presence of higher molecular weight species, postulated to be formed through cross‐coupling of these intermediates.     

C?H Bond Activation/Borylation of Furans and Thiophenes Catalyzed by a Half‐Sandwich Iron N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Complex

A coordinatively unsaturated iron‐methyl complex having an N‐heterocyclic carbene ligand, [Cp*Fe(L^Me)Me] ( 1 ; Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅, L^Me=1,3,4,5‐tetramethyl‐imidazol‐2‐ylidene), is synthesized from the reaction of [Cp*Fe(TMEDA)Cl] (TMEDA=N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine) with methyllithium and L^Me. Complex 1 is found to activate the C? H bonds of furan, thiophene, and benzene, giving rise to aryl complexes, [Cp*Fe(L^Me)(aryl)] (aryl=2‐furyl ( 2 ), 2‐thienyl ( 3 ), phenyl ( 4 )). The C? H bond cleavage reactions are applied to the dehydrogenative coupling of furans or thiophenes with pinacolborane (HBpin) in the presence of tert‐butylethylene and a catalytic amount of 1 (10 mol % to HBpin). The borylation of the furan/thiophene or 2‐substituted furans/thiophenes occurs exclusively at the 2‐ or 5‐positions, respectively, whereas that of 3‐substituted furans/thiophenes takes place mainly at the 5‐position and gives a mixture of regioisomers. Treatment of 2 with 2 equiv of HBpin results in the quantitative formation of 2‐boryl‐furan and the borohydride complex [Cp*Fe(L^Me)(H₂Bpin)] ( 5 ). Heating a solution of 5 in the presence of tert‐butylethylene led to the formation of an alkyl complex [Cp*Fe(L^Me)CH₂CH₂tBu] ( 6 ), which was found to cleave the C? H bond of furan to produce 2 . On the basis of these results, a possible catalytic cycle is proposed.     

Supramolecular architectures in the salt trimethoprimium ferrocene‐1‐carboxylate and the cocrystal 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–ferrocene‐1‐carboxylic acid (1/1)

In the salt trimethoprimium ferrocenecarboxylate [systematic name: 2,4‐diamino‐5‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxybenzyl)pyrimidin‐1‐ium ferrocene‐1‐carboxylate], (C₁₄H₁₉N₄O₃)[Fe(C₅H₅)(C₆H₄O₂)], (I), of the antibacterial compound trimethoprim, the carboxylate group interacts with the protonated aminopyrimidine group of trimethoprim via two N—H…O hydrogen bonds, generating a robust R ₂²(8) ring motif (heterosynthon). However, in the cocrystal 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–ferrocene‐1‐carboxylic acid (1/1), [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₆H₅O₂)]·C₆H₈ClN₃, (II), the carboxyl–aminopyrimidine interaction [R ₂²(8) motif] is absent. The carboxyl group interacts with the pyrimidine ring via a single O—H…N hydrogen bond. The pyrimidine rings, however, form base pairs via a pair of N—H…N hydrogen bonds, generating an R ₂²(8) supramolecular homosynthon. In salt (I), the unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl ring is disordered over two positions, with a refined site‐occupation ratio of 0.573 (10):0.427 (10). In this study, the two five‐membered cyclopentadienyl (Cp) rings of ferrocene are in a staggered conformation, as is evident from the C…Cg …Cg …C pseudo‐torsion angles, which are in the range 36.13–37.53° for (I) and 22.58–23.46° for (II). Regarding the Cp ring of the minor component in salt (I), the geometry of the ferrocene ring is in an eclipsed conformation, as is evident from the C…Cg …Cg …C pseudo‐torsion angles, which are in the range 79.26–80.94°. Both crystal structures are further stabilized by weak π–π interactions.     

Regiospecific one‐pot synthesis of new trifluoromethyl substituted heteroaryl pyrazolyl ketones

A convenient and general method for the regiospecific synthesis of three novel series of 1‐(2‐thenoyl)‐, 1‐(2‐furoyl)‐ and 1‐(isonicotinoyl)‐3‐alkyl(aryl)‐5‐hydroxy‐5‐trifluoromethyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazoles, in good yields (53 – 91 %), from the cyclocondensation reactions of 1,1,1‐trifluoro‐4‐alkoxy‐4‐alkyl(aryl)‐but‐3‐en‐2‐ones, where alkyl = H and Me; aryl = ‐C₆H₅, 4‐CH₃C₆H₄, 4‐CH₃OC₆H₄, 4‐FC₆H₄, 4‐ClC₆H₄, 4‐BrC₆H₄, 4‐NO₂CgH₄ with 2‐thiophenecarboxylic hydrazide, furoic hydrazide and isonicotinic acid hydrazide, respectively, is reported. Subsequently dehydration reaction of phenyl substituted 2‐pyrazolines with P₂O₅ furnished the corresponding 1H‐pyrazoles as mixture of regioisomers and in low yields (35 – 36 %).     

Synthesis and single crystal X‐ray determination of the Schiff base 1‐[(2‐isopropyl‐5‐methylphenoxy)hydrazono] ethyl ferrocene

The reaction of acetylferrocene [Fe(η‐C₅H₅)(η‐C₅H₄COCH₃)] (1) with (2‐isopropyl‐5‐methylphenoxy) acetic acid hydrazide [CH₃C₆H₃CH(CH₃)₂OCH₂CONHNH₂] (2) in refluxing ethanol gives the stable light‐orange–brown Schiff base 1‐[(2‐isopropyl‐5‐methylphenoxy)hydrazono] ethyl ferrocene, [CH₃C₆H₃CH(CH₃)₂OCH₂CONHN?C(CH₃)Fe(η‐C₅H₅)(η‐C₅H₄)] (3). Complex 3 has been characterized by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H NMR and single crystal X‐ray diffraction study. It crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n, with a = 9.6965(15), b = 7.4991(12), c = 29.698(7) Å, β = 99.010(13) °, V = 2132.8(7) ų, D_calc = 1.346 Mg m^?3; absorption coefficient, 0.729 mm^?1. The crystal structure clearly shows the characteristic [N? H···O] hydrogen bonding between the two adjacent molecules of 3. This acts as a bidentale ligand, which, on treatment with [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂] _n, gives a stable bimetallic yellow–orange complex (4). Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

An efficient and regiospecific preparation of trifluoromethyl substituted 4‐( 1H‐pyrazol‐1 ‐yl)‐7‐chloroquinolines

A new series of 4‐[3‐alkyl(aryl)(heteroaryl)‐5‐hydroxy‐5‐trifluoromethyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl]‐7‐chloroquinolines, where [alkyl = CH₃; aryl = C₆H₅, 4‐CH₃C₆H₄, 4‐FC₆H₄, 4‐ClC₆H₄, 4‐BrC₆H₄, 4‐CH₃OCgH₄, 4‐NO₂CgH₄, 4‐biphenyl, 1‐naphthyl; heteroaryl = 2‐furyl and 2‐thienyl] has been regiospecifi‐caly obtained from the reaction of 7‐chloro‐4‐hydrazinoquinoline with 4‐substituted‐l,1,1‐trifluoro‐4‐methoxybut‐3‐en‐2‐ones in 61 ‐ 96 % yield. Subsequently, dehydration reaction of 4,5‐dihydropyra‐zolylquinolines under acid conditions furnished a new series of 4‐(3‐substituted‐5‐trifluoromethyl‐1H‐pyra‐zol‐1‐yl)‐7‐chloroquinolines in 73 ‐ 96 % yield.     

Regiospecific synthesis of trichloromethyl substituted 4,5‐dihydro‐1h‐1‐tosylpyrazoles

The regiospecific synthesis of a new series of eight 3‐alkyl(aryl)‐5‐hydroxy‐5‐trichloromethyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐1‐tosylpyrazoles is reported. The 1‐p‐tosyl‐2‐pyrazolines were obtained from the cyclocondensation reaction of 4‐alkyl(aryl)‐4‐alkoxy‐1,1,1‐trichloroalk‐3‐en‐2‐ones, [where alkyl = H, Me and aryl = ‐C₆H₅, 4‐CH₃C₆H₄, 4‐OCH₃C₆H₄, 4‐FC₆H₄, 4‐ClC₆H₄, 4‐BrC₆H₄,] with p‐tosylhydrazine in 64 to 92 % yields, employing anhydrous toluene at reflux or diethyl ether at room temperature as the reaction condition.     

Propynylferrocene and (phenyl­ethyn­yl)­ferrocene

The title compounds, propynylferrocene, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₈H₇)], (I), and (phenyl­ethyn­yl)ferrocene, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₃H₉)], (II), are stabilized by weak C—H⋯π inter­actions. The C[triple‐bond]C bond distances in these mol­ecules are in the range 1.182 (3)–1.192 (3) Å. In (II), the ferrocenyl and phenyl groups are perpendicular, making an angle of 89.06 (13)°, which is a rare occurrence.     

Four (2,2′‐bipyridyl)(ferrocenyl)boronium derivatives

Crystal structures are reported for four (2,2′‐bipyridyl)(ferrocenyl)boronium derivatives, namely (2,2′‐bipyridyl)(ethenyl)(ferrocenyl)boronium hexafluoridophosphate, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₇H₁₅BN₂)]PF₆, (Ib), (2,2′‐bipyridyl)(tert‐butylamino)(ferrocenyl)boronium bromide, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₉H₂₂BN₃)]Br, (IIa), (2,2′‐bipyridyl)(ferrocenyl)(4‐methoxyphenylamino)boronium hexafluoridophosphate acetonitrile hemisolvate, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₂H₂₀BN₃O)]PF₆·0.5CH₃CN, (IIIb), and 1,1′‐bis[(2,2′‐bipyridyl)(cyanomethyl)boronium]ferrocene bis(hexafluoridophosphate), [Fe(C₁₇H₁₄BN₃)₂](PF₆)₂, (IVb). The asymmetric unit of (IIIb) contains two independent cations with very similar conformations. The B atom has a distorted tetrahedral coordination in all four structures. The cyclopentadienyl rings of (Ib), (IIa) and (IIIb) are approximately eclipsed, while a bisecting conformation is found for (IVb). The N—H groups of (IIa) and (IIIb) are shielded by the ferrocenyl and tert‐butyl or phenyl groups and are therefore not involved in hydrogen bonding. The B—N(amine) bond lengths are shortened by delocalization of π‐electrons. In the cations with an amine substituent at boron, the B—N(bipyridyl) bonds are 0.035 (3) Å longer than in the cations with a methylene C atom bonded to boron. A similar lengthening of the B—N(bipyridyl) bonds is found in a survey of related cations with an oxy group attached to the B atom.     

Synthesis and characterization of some ferrocene-containing telluroether ligands: crystal structure of 1,1′-bis(phenyltelluro)ferrocene

A series of five monodentate ferrocene tellurium ligands of the type Fe(C₅H₅)(C₅H₄TeR) and five bidentate 1,1′-disubstituted ferrocene tellurium ligands of the type Fe(C₅H₄TeR)₂ (R = Me, ⁿBu, C₆H₅, p-MeOC₆H₄, p-EtOC₆H₄) has been prepared by the reaction of 1,1′-dilithioferrocene with the appropriate ditellurides R₂Te₂. The ligands have been characterized by their elemental analyses, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra, mass spectra and cyclic voltammetry studies. The structure of Fe(C₅H₄TeC₆H₅)₂ has been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction study.     

Ferrocene compounds. XXXIV. 1′‐(tert‐Butoxycarbonylamino)ferrocene‐1‐carboxylic acid

Heteroannularly substituted ferrocene derivatives can act as model systems for various hydrogen‐bonded assemblies of biomol­ecules formed, for instance, by means of O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding. The crystal structure analysis of 1′‐(tert‐butoxy­carbonyl­amino)­ferrocene‐1‐carbox­ylic acid, [Fe(C₁₀H₁₄NO₂)(C₆H₅O₂)] or (C₅H₄COOH)Fe(C₅­H₄NHCOOC(CH₃)₃, reveals two independent mol­ecules within the asymmetric unit, and these are joined into discrete dimers by two types of intermolecular hydrogen bonds, viz. O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O. The –COOH and –NHCOOR groups are archetypes for dimer formation via two eight‐membered rings. The O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds [2.656 (3) and 2.663 (3) Å] form a cyclic carboxylic acid dimer motif. Another eight‐membered ring is formed by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds [2.827 (3) and 2.854 (3) Å] between the N—H group and an O atom of another carbamoyl moiety. The dimers are assembled in a herring‐bone fashion in the bc plane.     

Monohalogenated ferrocenes C5H5FeC5H4X (X = Cl,Br and I) and a second polymorph of C5H5FeC5H4I

The structures of the three title monosubstituted ferrocenes, namely 1‐chloroferrocene, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₅H₄Cl)], (I), 1‐bromoferrocene, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₅H₄Br)], (II), and 1‐iodoferrocene, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₅H₄I)], (III), were determined at 100 K. The chloro‐ and bromoferrocenes are isomorphous crystals. The new triclinic polymorph [space group P, Z = 4, T = 100 K, V = 943.8 (4) ų] of iodoferrocene, (III), and the previously reported monoclinic polymorph of (III) [Laus, Wurst & Schottenberger (2005). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 220 , 229–230; space group Pc, Z = 4, T = 100 K, V = 924.9 ų] were obtained by crystallization from ethanolic solutions at 253 and 303 K, respectively. All four phases contain two independent molecules in the unit cell. The relative orientations of the cyclopentadienyl (Cp) rings are eclipsed and staggered in the independent molecules of (I) and (II), while (III) demonstrates only an eclipsed conformation. The triclinic and monoclinic polymorphs of (III) contain nonbonded intermolecular I...I contacts, causing different packing modes. In the triclinic form of (III), the molecules are arranged in zigzag tetramers, while in the monoclinic form the molecules are arranged in zigzag chains along the a axis. Crystallographic data for (III), along with the computed lattice energies of the two polymorphs, suggest that the monoclinic form is more stable.     

Partially oxidized ruthenium phosphine thiol­ates: [Ru(pySO2)0.33(pyS)1.67(dppe)] and [Ru(pySO2)0.355(pyS)1.645(dppp)]

The crystal structures of [1,3‐bis­(diphenyl­phosphino)ethane‐κ²P,P′](pyridine‐2‐sulfinato‐κ²N,S)(pyridine‐2‐thiol­ato‐κ²N,S)ruthenium(II), [Ru(C₅H₄NO₂S)_0.33(C₅H₄NS)_1.67(C₂₆H₂₄P₂)] or [Ru(pySO₂)_1−x(pyS)_1+x(dppe)] (x = 0.67), (I), and [1,3‐bis­(diphenyl­phosphino)propane‐κ²P,P′](pyridine‐2‐sulfinato‐κ²N,S)(pyridine‐2‐thiol­ato‐κ²N,S)ruthenium(II), [Ru(C₅H₄NO₂S)_0.355(C₅H₄NS)_1.645(C₂₇H₂₆P₂)] or [Ru(pySO₂)_1−x(pyS)_1+x(dppp)] (x = 0.645), (II), are composed of neutral distorted octa­hedral Ru^II complexes with chelating pyridine‐2‐thiol­ate, pyridine‐2‐sulfinate and biphosphine ligands. The S atoms are trans to each other, while pairs of P and N atoms are in cis positions. Partial double‐bond character is observed for C—S. The crystal packing consists of monolayers stabilized by C—H⋯O and C—H⋯S inter­actions, and is affected by the alkyl‐chain lengths.     

The Knoevenagel product of indolin‐2‐one and ferrocene‐1,1′‐dicarbaldehyde

Indolin‐2‐one (oxindole), (I), undergoes a Knoevenagel condensation with ferrocene‐1,1′‐dicarbaldehyde, (II), to afford the title complex 3,3′‐[(E,E)‐ferrocene‐1,1′‐diyldimethylidyne]diindolin‐2‐one dichloromethane disolvate, [Fe(C₂₈H₂₀N₂O₂)]·2CH₂Cl₂, (IV). The structure of (IV) contains two ferrocene complex molecules in the asymmetric unit and displays, as expected, intermolecular hydrogen bonding (N—H...O=C) between the indolin‐2‐one units. Intermolecular π–π stacking interactions are also observed.     

Azido­[1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene](penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate

In the title compound, azido‐2κN‐bis­[μ‐(1η⁵:2κP)‐di­phenyl­phosphino­cyclo­penta­dienyl][2(η⁵)‐penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­di­enyl]­iron(III)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [{Rh(C₁₀H₁₅)(N₃)}{Fe(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂}]PF₆ or [FeRh(C₁₀H₁₅)(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂(N₃)]PF₆, the coordination sphere of Rh^III can be described as pseudo‐tetrahedral, composed of two P atoms from a 1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene (dppf) ligand, an azido N atom and the centroid of the ring of a C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ligand. The two cyclo­penta­dienyl rings in the dppf moiety adopt an eclipsed conformation. The Rh⋯Fe distance is 4.340 (2) Å.