Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia and Descartes’ letters (1650–1665)

After Descartes’ death in 1650, Princess Elizabeth generously shared with others several letters she had received from the philosopher, which contained philosophically as well as mathematically exciting material. In this article I place the transmission of these copies in context, revealing that Elizabeth steadily became an intellectually inspiring figure, attracting international attention. In the 1650s she stayed at Heidelberg where she discussed Cartesian philosophy with professors and students alike, including the professor of philosophy and mathematics Johann von Leuneschlos. In the mid-1660s, an initiative was taken from the English side of the Channel (Pell, More) to obtain Descartes’ mathematical letters to Elizabeth that had not yet been published. One letter of Elizabeth herself on this very subject has been preserved. The letter, addressed to Theodore Haak, will be published here for the first time. It is of special interest, because the princess supplies a general outline of her solution to the mathematical problem Descartes gave her to solve in 1643. It substantiates the hypothesis regarding Elizabeth’s solution earlier proposed by Henk Bos.     

A dialogue on the use of arithmetic in geometry: Van Ceulen’s and Snellius’s Fundamenta Arithmetica et Geometrica

Snellius’s Fundamenta Arithmetica et Geometrica (1615) is much more than a Latin translation of Ludolph van Ceulen’s Arithmetische en Geometrische Fondamenten. Willebrord Snellius both adapted and commented on the Dutch original in his Fundamenta, and thus his Latin version can be read as a dialogue between representatives of two different approaches to mathematics in the early modern period: Snellius’s humanist approach and Van Ceulen’s practitioner’s approach. This article considers the relationship between the Dutch and Latin versions of the text and, in particular, puts some of their statements on the use of numbers in geometry under the microscope. In addition, Snellius’s use of the Fundamenta as an instrument to further his career is explained.     

Some remarks on the meaning of equality in Diophantos’s Arithmetica

Diophantos in Arithmetica, without having defined previously any concept of “equality” or “equation,” employs a concept of the unknown number as a tool for solving problems and finds its value from an equality ad hoc created. In this paper we analyze Diophantos’s practices in the creation and simplification of such equalities, aiming to adduce more evidence on certain issues arising in recent historical research on the meaning of the “equation” in Diophantos’s work.     

Leonhard Euler’s use and understanding of mathematical transcendence

Leonhard Euler primarily applied the term “transcendental” to quantities which could be variable or determined. Analyzing Euler’s use and understanding of mathematical transcendence as applied to operations, functions, progressions, and determined quantities as well as the eighteenth century practice of definition allows the author to evaluate claims that Euler provided the first modern definition of a transcendental number. The author argues that Euler’s informal and pragmatic use of mathematical transcendence highlights the general nature of eighteenth century mathematics and proposes an alternate perspective on the issue at hand: transcendental numbers inherited their transcendental classification from functions.     

A retelling of Newton’s work on Kepler’s Laws

This paper details an investigation into Kepler’s Laws. Newton’s technique for deducing an inverse-square law from Kepler’s Laws is given a modern presentation, with necessary background material included. Kepler’s Laws are then deduced from the assumption of an inverse-square law. This is done in a geometric style, inspired by Newton’s work. Finally, a problem involving planetary orbits is stated and solved using the earlier results of the paper.     

Calculations of faith: mathematics, philosophy, and sanctity in 18th-century Italy (new work on Maria Gaetana Agnesi)

The recent publication of three books on Maria Gaetana Agnesi (1718-1799) offers an opportunity to reflect on how we have understood and misunderstood her legacy to the history of mathematics, as the author of an important vernacular textbook, Instituzioni analitiche ad uso della gioventú italiana (Milan, 1748), and one of the best-known women natural philosophers and mathematicians of her generation. This article discusses the work of Antonella Cupillari, Franco Minonzio, and Massimo Mazzotti in relation to earlier studies of Agnesi and reflects on the current state of this subject in light of the author’s own research on Agnesi.     

One of Berkeley’s arguments on compensating errors in the calculus

This paper addresses three questions related to George Berkeley’s theory of compensating errors in the calculus published in 1734. The first is how did Berkeley conceive of Leibnizian differentials? The second and most central question concerns Berkeley’s procedure which consisted in identifying two quantities as errors and proving that they are equal. The question is how was this possible? The answer is that this was not possible, because in his calculations Berkeley misguided himself by employing a result equivalent to what he wished to prove. In 1797 Lazare Carnot published the expression “a compensation of errors” in an attempt to explain why the calculus functions. The third question is: did Carnot by this expression mean the same as Berkeley?     

Robert Leslie Ellisʼs work on philosophy of science and the foundations of probability theory

The goal of this paper is to provide an extensive account of Robert Leslie Ellis?s largely forgotten work on philosophy of science and probability theory. On the one hand, it is suggested that both his ‘idealist’ renovation of the Baconian theory of induction and a ‘realism’ vis-à-vis natural kinds were the result of a complex dialogue with the work of William Whewell. On the other hand, it is shown to what extent the combining of these two positions contributed to Ellis?s reformulation of the metaphysical foundations of traditional probability theory. This parallel is assessed with reference to the disagreement between Ellis and Whewell on the nature of (pure) mathematics and its relation to scientific knowledge.     

The rectification of quadratures as a central foundational problem for the early Leibnizian calculus

Transcendental curves posed a foundational challenge for the early calculus, as they demanded an extension of traditional notions of geometrical rigour and method. One of the main early responses to this challenge was to strive for the reduction of quadratures to rectifications. I analyse the arguments given to justify this enterprise and propose a hypothesis as to their underlying rationale. I then go on to argue that these foundational concerns provided the true motivation for much ostensibly applied work in this period, using Leibniz’s envelope paper of 1694 as a case study.     

The evolution of transformation media in spherical trigonometry in 17th- and 18th-century China,and its relation to “Western learning”

Problems of spherical trigonometry in 17th- and 18th-century China were often reduced to problems in plane trigonometry and then solved by means of the proportionality of corresponding sides of similar right triangles. Nevertheless, in the literature on the history of Chinese mathematics, there is not much discussion on the transformation and reduction of spherical problems to the plane, and how the techniques utilized for such transformations evolved over time. In this article, I investigate the evolution of the transformation media involved. I will show that in the trigonometric treatises by Mei Wending (1633–1721) and Dai Zhen (1724–1777), the authors’ views on Western learning shaped their choices of transformation media, and conversely their choices of transformation media offered support to their views on trigonometry in the debate of Chinese versus Western methods. Based on my analysis, I also propose a reassessment of Dai’s treatise of trigonometry, which was controversial ever since its publication in the 18th century.     

The great theorem of A.A. Markoff and Jean Bernoulli sequences

A proof of Markoff’s Great Theorem on the Lagrange spectrum using continued fractions is sketched. Markoff’s periods and Jean Bernoulli sequence ¹ are used to obtain a simple algorithm for the computation of the Lagrange spectrum below 3.     

On the modularity of the GL<Subscript>2</Subscript>-twisted spinor L-function

In modern number theory there are famous theorems on the modularity of Dirichlet series attached to geometric or arithmetic objects. There is Hecke’s converse theorem, Wiles proof of the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture, and Fermat’s Last Theorem to name a few. In this article in the spirit of the Langlands philosophy we raise the question on the modularity of the GL₂-twisted spinor L-function Z _{G ⊗ h} (s) related to automorphic forms G,h on the symplectic group GSp₂ and GL₂. This leads to several promising results and finally culminates into a precise very general conjecture. This gives new insights into the Miyawaki conjecture on spinor L-functions of modular forms. We indicate how this topic is related to Ramakrishnan’s work on the modularity of the Rankin-Selberg L-series.     

The story of majorizability as Karamata’s condition of convergence for Abel summable series

The greatest Serbian mathematician, Jovan Karamata (1902–1967), gained worldwide fame working on problems related to theorems of a Tauberian nature. His simple and elegant 1930 proof of the Hardy–Littlewood theorem found its place in the well-known monographs by Titchmarsh, Knopp, Doetsch, Widder, Hardy and Favard. It is less known that the method used in this proof was mentioned for the first time at a conference of the Academy of Natural Sciences of the Serbian Royal Academy of Sciences in Belgrade in 1929, where Karamata introduced the notion of majorizability as a new condition of convergence for Abel summable series. This fact holds the key to a historical insight into Karamata’s famous proof of the Hardy–Littlewood theorem.     

The origins of Euler's early work on continued fractions

In this paper, I examine Euler's early work on the elementary properties of continued fractions in the 1730s, and investigate its possible links to previous writings on continued fractions by authors such as William Brouncker. By analysing the content of Euler's first paper on continued fractions, ‘De fractionibus continuis dissertatio’ (1737, published 1744) I conclude that, contrary to what one might expect, Euler's work on continued fractions initially arose not from earlier writings on continued fractions, but from a wish to solve the Riccati differential equation.     

Commentary on Robert Riley’s article “A personal account of the discovery of hyperbolic structures on some knot complements”

We give some background and biographical commentary on the posthumous article  [4] that appears in this journal issue by Robert Riley on his part of the early history of hyperbolic structures on some compact 3-manifolds. A complete list of Riley’s publications appears at the end of this article.     

Nineteenth century roots of quasideterminants

In this expository paper I provide a complete record of the nineteenth century publications that bear on the development of quasideterminants in the twentieth century. Two important recursive feasible algorithms, Sylvester’s from 1851 and Dodgson’s from 1866 are discussed, and the antecedents of both are traced back to work by Jacobi.