An analysis of quasi-frequency-modulated noise and random-sideband noise as comparisons for amplitude-modulated noise

Experiments were performed to determine under what conditions quasi-frequency-modulated (QFM) noise and random-sideband noise are suitable comparisons for AM noise in measuring a temporal modulation transfer function (TMTF). Thresholds were measured for discrimination of QFM from random-sideband noise and AM from QFM noise as a function of sideband separation. In the first experiment, the upper spectral edge of the noise stimuli was at 2400 Hz and the bandwidth was 1600 Hz. For sideband separations up to 256 Hz, at threshold sideband levels for discriminating AM from QFM noise, QFM was indiscriminable from random-sideband noise. For the largest sideband separation used (512 Hz), listeners may have used within-stimulus envelope correlation in the QFM noise to discriminate it from the random-sideband noise. Results when stimulus bandwidth was varied suggest that listeners were able to use this cue when the carrier was wider than a critical band, and the sideband separation approached the carrier bandwidth. Within-stimulus envelope correlation was also present in AM noise, and thus QFM noise was a suitable comparison because it made this cue unusable and forced listeners to use across-stimulus envelope differences. When the carrier bandwidth was less than a critical band or was wideband, QFM noise and random-sideband noise were equally suitable comparisons for AM noise. When discrimination thresholds for QFM and random-sideband noise were converted to modulation depth and modulation frequency, they were nearly identical to those for discrimination of AM from QFM noise, suggesting that listeners were using amplitude modulation cues in both cases.     

Intrinsic envelope fluctuations and modulation-detection thresholds for narrow-band noise carriers

A model is presented which calculates the intrinsic envelope power of a bandpass noise carrier within the passband of a hypothetical modulation filter tuned to a specific modulation frequency. Model predictions are compared to experimentally obtained amplitude modulation (AM) detection thresholds. In experiment 1, thresholds for modulation rates of 5, 25, and 100 Hz imposed on a bandpass Gaussian noise carrier with a fixed upper cutoff frequency of 6 kHz and a bandwidth in the range from 1 to 6000 Hz were obtained. In experiment 2, three noises with different spectra of the intrinsic fluctuations served as the carrier: Gaussian noise, multiplied noise, and low-noise noise. In each case, the carrier was spectrally centered at 5 kHz and had a bandwidth of 50 Hz. The AM detection thresholds were obtained for modulation frequencies of 10, 20, 30, 50, 70, and 100 Hz. The intrinsic envelope power of the carrier at the output of the modulation filter tuned to the signal modulation frequency appears to provide a good estimate for AM detection threshold. The results are compared with predictions on the basis of the more complex auditory processing model by Dau et al.     

Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration

These experiments examine how comodulation masking release (CMR) varies with masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. In experiment 1, thresholds were measured for a 400-ms, 2000-Hz signal masked by continuous noise varying in bandwidth from 50-3200 Hz in 1-oct steps. In one condition, using random noise maskers, thresholds increased with increasing bandwidth up to 400 Hz and then remained approximately constant. In another set of conditions, the masker was multiplied (amplitude modulated) by a low-pass noise (bandwidth varied from 12.5-400 Hz in 1-oct steps). This produced correlated envelope fluctuations across frequency. Thresholds were generally lower than for random noise maskers with the same bandwidth. For maskers less than one critical band wide, the release from masking was largest (about 5 dB) for maskers with low rates of modulation (12.5-Hz-wide low-pass modulator). It is argued that this release from masking is not a "true" CMR but results from a within-channel cue. For broadband maskers (greater than 400 Hz), the release from masking increased with increasing masker bandwidth and decreasing modulator bandwidth, reaching an asymptote of 12 dB for a masker bandwidth of 800 Hz and a modulator bandwidth of 50 Hz. Most of this release from masking can be attributed to a CMR. In experiment 2, the modulator bandwidth was fixed at 12.5 Hz and the signal duration was varied. For masker bandwidths greater than 400 Hz, the CMR decreased from 12 to 5 dB as the signal duration was decreased from 400 to 25 ms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Differential contribution of envelope fluctuations across frequency to consonant identification in quiet

Two experiments investigated the effects of critical bandwidth and frequency region on the use of temporal envelope cues for speech. In both experiments, spectral details were reduced using vocoder processing. In experiment 1, consonant identification scores were measured in a condition for which the cutoff frequency of the envelope extractor was half the critical bandwidth (HCB) of the auditory filters centered on each analysis band. Results showed that performance is similar to those obtained in conditions for which the envelope cutoff was set to 160 Hz or above. Experiment 2 evaluated the impact of setting the cutoff frequency of the envelope extractor to values of 4, 8, and 16 Hz or to HCB in one or two contiguous bands for an eight-band vocoder. The cutoff was set to 16 Hz for all the other bands. Overall, consonant identification was not affected by removing envelope fluctuations above 4 Hz in the low- and high-frequency bands. In contrast, speech intelligibility decreased as the cutoff frequency was decreased in the midfrequency region from 16 to 4 Hz. The behavioral results were fairly consistent with a physical analysis of the stimuli, suggesting that clearly measurable envelope fluctuations cannot be attenuated without affecting speech intelligibility.     

Subcomponent cues in binaural unmasking

The addition of a signal in the N0Sπ binaural configuration gives rise to fluctuations in interaural phase and amplitude. Sensitivity to these individual cues was measured by applying sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) or quasi-frequency modulation (QFM) to a band of noise. Discrimination between interaurally in-phase and out-of-phase modulation was measured using an adaptive task for narrow bands of noise at center frequencies from 250 to 1500 Hz, for modulation rates of 2-40 Hz, and with or without flanking bands of diotic noise. Discrimination thresholds increased steeply for QFM with increasing center frequency, but increased only modestly for AM, and mainly for modulation rates below 10 Hz. Flanking bands of noise increased thresholds for AM, but had no consistent effect for QFM. The results suggest that two underlying mechanisms may support binaural unmasking: one most sensitive to interaural amplitude modulations that is susceptible to across-frequency interference, and a second, most sensitive to interaural phase modulations that is immune to such effects.     

Binaural modulation masking

Modulation thresholds were measured in three subjects for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) wideband noise (the signal) in the presence of a second amplitude-modulated wideband noise (the masker). In monaural conditions (Mm-Sm) masker and signal were presented to only one ear; in binaural conditions (M0-S pi) the masker was presented diotically while the phase of modulation of the SAM noise signal was inverted in one ear relative to the other. In experiment 1 masker modulation frequency (fm) was fixed at 16 Hz, and signal modulation frequency (fs) was varied from 2-512 Hz. For monaural presentation, masking generally decreased as fs diverged from fm, although there was a secondary increase in masking for very low signal modulation frequencies, as reported previously [Bacon and Grantham, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 2575-2580 (1989)]. The binaural masking patterns did not show this low-frequency upturn: binaural thresholds continued to improve as fs decreased from 16 to 2 Hz. Thus, comparing masked monaural and masked binaural thresholds, there was an average binaural advantage, or masking-level difference (MLD) of 9.4 dB at fs = 2 Hz and 5.3 dB at fs = 4 Hz. In addition, there were positive MLDs for the on-frequency condition (fm = fs = 16 Hz: average MLD = 4.4 dB) and for the highest signal frequency tested (fs = 512 Hz: average MLD = 7.3 dB). In experiment 2 the signal was a SAM noise (fs = 16 Hz), and the masker was a wideband noise, amplitude-modulated by a narrow band of noise centered at fs. There was no effect on monaural or binaural thresholds as masker modulator bandwidth was varied from 4 to 20 Hz (the average MLD remained constant at 8.0 dB), which suggests that the observed "tuning" for modulation may be based on temporal pattern discrimination and not on a critical-band-like filtering mechanism. In a final condition the masker modulator was a 10-Hz-wide band of noise centered at the 64-Hz signal modulation frequency. The average MLD in this case was 7.4 dB. The results are discussed in terms of various binaural capacities that probably play a role in binaural release from modulation masking, including detection of varying interaural intensity differences (IIDs) and discrimination of interaural correlation.     

Importance of temporal-envelope cues in consonant recognition

The role of different modulation frequencies in the speech envelope were studied by means of the manipulation of vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) syllables. The envelope of the signal was extracted from the speech and the fine-structure was replaced by speech-shaped noise. The temporal envelopes in every critical band of the speech signal were notch filtered in order to assess the relative importance of different modulation frequency regions between 0 and 20 Hz. For this purpose notch filters around three center frequencies (8, 12, and 16 Hz) with three different notch widths (4-, 8-, and 12-Hz wide) were used. These stimuli were used in a consonant-recognition task in which ten normal-hearing subjects participated, and their results were analyzed in terms of recognition scores. More qualitative information was obtained with a multidimensional scaling method (INDSCAL) and sequential information analysis (SINFA). Consonant recognition is very robust for the removal of certain modulation frequency areas. Only when a wide notch around 8 Hz is applied does the speech signal become heavily degraded. As expected, the voicing information is lost, while there are different effects on plosiveness and nasality. Even the smallest filtering has a substantial effect on the transfer of the plosiveness feature, while on the other hand, filtering out only the low-modulation frequencies has a substantial effect on the transfer of nasality cues.     

Effect of modulator asynchrony of sinusoidal and noise modulators on frequency and amplitude modulation detection interference

The effect on modulation detection interference (MDI) of timing of gating of the modulation of target and interferer, with synchronously gated carriers, was investigated in three experiments. In a two-interval, two-alternative forced choice adaptive procedure, listeners had to detect 15 Hz sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) or frequency modulation (FM) imposed for 200 ms in the temporal center of a 600 ms target sinusoidal carrier. In the first experiment, 15 Hz sinusoidal FM was imposed in phase on both target and interferer carriers. Thresholds were lower for nonoverlapping than for synchronous modulation of target and interferer, but MDI still occurred for the former. Thresholds were significantly higher when the modulators were gated synchronously than when the interferer modulator was gated on before and off after that of the target. This contrasts with the findings of Oxenham and Dau [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 402-408 (2001)], who reported no effect of modulation asynchrony on AM detection thresholds, using a narrowband noise modulator. Using FM, experiment 2 showed that for temporally overlapping modulation of target and interferer, modulator asynchrony had no significant effect when the interferer was modulated by a narrowband noise. Experiment 3 showed that, for AM, synchronous gating of modulation of the target and interferer produced lower thresholds than asynchronous gating, especially for sinusoidal modulation of the interferer. Results are discussed in terms of specific cues available for periodic modulation, and differences between perceptual grouping on the basis of common AM and FM.     

Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation.

This article is concerned with the detection of mixed modulation (MM), i.e., simultaneously occurring amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM). In experiment 1, an adaptive two-alternative forced-choice task was used to determine thresholds for detecting AM alone. Then, thresholds for detecting FM were determined for stimuli which had a fixed amount of AM in the signal interval only. The amount of AM was always less than the threshold for detecting AM alone. The FM thresholds depended significantly on the magnitude of the coexisting AM. For low modulation rates (4, 16, and 64 Hz), the FM thresholds did not depend significantly on the relative phase of modulation for the FM and AM. For a high modulation rate (256 Hz) strong effects of modulator phase were observed. These phase effects are as predicted by the model proposed by Hartmann and Hnath [Acustica 50, 297-312 (1982)], which assumes that detection of modulation at modulation frequencies higher than the critical modulation frequency is based on detection of the lower sideband in the modulated signal's spectrum. In the second experiment, psychometric functions were measured for the detection of AM alone and FM alone, using modulation rates of 4 and 16 Hz. Results showed that, for each type of modulation, d' is approximately a linear function of the square of the modulation index. Application of this finding to the results of experiment 1 suggested that, at low modulation rates, FM and AM are not detected by completely independent mechanisms. In the third experiment, psychometric functions were again measured for the detection of AM alone and FM alone, using a 10-Hz modulation rate. Detectability was then measured for combined AM and FM, with modulation depths selected so that each type of modulation would be equally detectable if presented alone. Significant effects of relative modulator phase were found when detectability was relatively high. These effects were not correctly predicted by either a single-band excitation-pattern model or a multiple-band excitation-pattern model. However, the detectability of the combined AM and FM was better than would be predicted if the two types of modulation were coded completely independently.     

Modulation detection interference: effects of concurrent and sequential streaming

The presence of amplitude fluctuations in one frequency region can interfere with our ability to detect similar fluctuations in another (remote) frequency region. This effect is known as modulation detection interference (MDI). Gating the interfering and target sounds asynchronously is known to lead to a reduction in MDI, presumably because the two sounds become perceptually segregated. The first experiment examined the relative effects of carrier and modulator gating asynchrony in producing a release from MDI. The target carrier was a 900-ms, 4.3-kHz sinusoid, modulated in amplitude by a 500-ms, 16-Hz sinusoid, with 200-ms unmodulated fringes preceding and following the modulation. The interferer (masker) was a 1-kHz sinusoid, modulated by a narrowband noise with a 16-Hz bandwidth, centered around 16 Hz. Extending the masker carrier for 200 ms before and after the signal carrier reduced MDI, regardless of whether the target and masker modulators were gated synchronously or were gated with onset and offset asynchronies of 200 ms. Similarly, when the carriers were gated synchronously, asynchronous gating of the modulators did not produce a release from MDI. The second experiment measured MDI with a synchronous target and masker and investigated the effect of adding a series of precursor tones, which were designed to promote the forming of a perceptual stream with the masker, thereby leaving the target perceptually isolated. Four modulated or unmodulated precursor tones presented at the masker frequency were sufficient to completely eliminate MDI. The results support the idea that MDI is due to a perceptual grouping of the masker and target, and show that conditions promoting sufficient perceptual segregation of the masker and target can lead to a total elimination of MDI.     

Spectral modulation detection as a function of modulation frequency, carrier bandwidth, and carrier frequency region

The present study investigates the nature of spectral envelope perception using a spectral modulation detection task in which sinusoidal spectral modulation is superimposed upon a noise carrier. The principal goal of this study is to characterize spectral envelope perception in terms of the influence of modulation frequency (cycles/octave), carrier bandwidth (octaves), and carrier frequency region (defined by lower and upper cutoff frequencies in Hz). Spectral modulation detection thresholds measured as a function of spectral modulation frequency result in a spectral modulation transfer function (SMTF). The general form of the SMTF is bandpass in nature, with a minimum modulation detection threshold in the region between 2 to 4 cycles/octave. SMTFs are not strongly dependent on carrier bandwidth (ranging from 1 to 6 octaves) or carrier frequency region (ranging from 200 to 12 800 Hz), with the exception of carrier bands restricted to very low audio frequencies (e.g., 200-400 Hz). Spectral modulation detection thresholds do not depend on the presence of random level variations or random modulation phase across intervals. The SMTFs reported here and associated excitation pattern computations are considered in terms of a linear systems approach to spectral envelope perception and potential underlying mechanisms for the perception of spectral features.     

Effect of amplitude modulation coherence for masked speech signals filtered into narrow bands

Introduction of masker amplitude modulation (AM) can improve signal detection in a number of paradigms. In some cases this advantage depends on the coherence of modulation across a relatively wide frequency range. In the experiments described below, observers were asked to identify masked spondee words produced by a single male talker. The target spondees and masking noise were filtered into nine narrow bands, and the coherence of AM of either the speech signal or noise masker was manipulated. Inherent modulation of the masker bands was manipulated via assignment of real and imaginary values to the associated components of each band in the frequency domain, and AM of speech bands was achieved via multiplication with envelopes extracted from these maskers. Responses were based on two alternatives, four alternatives, or open response sets. The effect of masker AM coherence was highly dependent upon the size of the response set: coherent AM was associated with better thresholds in a two-alternative response set, but poorer thresholds in an open response set. Results with AM speech did not depend critically upon the across-frequency temporal synchrony of AM imposed on the speech material.     

Within- versus cross-channel mechanisms in detection of envelope phase disparity

These experiments were designed to examine the mechanism of detection of phase disparity in the envelopes of two sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (AM) sinusoids. Specifically, they were performed to determine whether detection of envelope phase disparity was consistent with processing within a single channel in which the AM tones were simply added. In the first condition, with an 8-Hz modulation frequency, phase-disparity thresholds increased sharply with an initial increase in separation of the carrier frequencies. They then remained approximately constant when the separation was an octave or above. In the second condition, with carrier pairs of 1 and 2 kHz or 1 and 3.2 kHz and a modulation frequency of 8 Hz, thresholds were little affected as the level of one carrier was decreased relative to the other. With a modulation frequency of 128 Hz, for most subjects there was more of an effect of level disparity on thresholds. In the third condition, when the modulation frequency was 8 Hz, subjects showed relatively constant thresholds whether the signals were presented monotically, dichotically, or dichotically with low- and high-pass noise. Dichotic thresholds were typically higher than monotic when the modulation frequency was 128 Hz. These results suggest that it is not necessary to have information available within a single additive channel to detect envelope phase disparity. In certain circumstances, a comparison across channels may be used to detect such disparities.     

Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition

This study investigated the cues for consonant recognition that are available in the time-intensity envelope of speech. Twelve normal-hearing subjects listened to three sets of spectrally identical noise stimuli created by multiplying noise with the speech envelopes of 19(aCa) natural-speech nonsense syllables. The speech envelope for each of the three noise conditions was derived using a different low-pass filter cutoff (20, 200, and 2000 Hz). Average consonant identification performance was above chance for the three noise conditions and improved significantly with the increase in envelope bandwidth from 20-200 Hz. SINDSCAL multidimensional scaling analysis of the consonant confusions data identified three speech envelope features that divided the 19 consonants into four envelope feature groups ("envemes"). The enveme groups in combination with visually distinctive speech feature groupings ("visemes") can distinguish most of the 19 consonants. These results suggest that near-perfect consonant identification performance could be attained by subjects who receive only enveme and viseme information and no spectral information.     

Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference?

The present study investigated the effect of envelope modulations in a background masker on consonant recognition by normal hearing listeners. It is well known that listeners understand speech better under a temporally modulated masker than under a steady masker at the same level, due to masking release. The possibility of an opposite phenomenon, modulation interference, whereby speech recognition could be degraded by a modulated masker due to interference with auditory processing of the speech envelope, was hypothesized and tested under various speech and masker conditions. It was of interest whether modulation interference for speech perception, if it were observed, could be predicted by modulation masking, as found in psychoacoustic studies using nonspeech stimuli. Results revealed that masking release measurably occurred under a variety of conditions, especially when the speech signal maintained a high degree of redundancy across several frequency bands. Modulation interference was also clearly observed under several circumstances when the speech signal did not contain a high redundancy. However, the effect of modulation interference did not follow the expected pattern from psychoacoustic modulation masking results. In conclusion, (1) both factors, modulation interference and masking release, should be accounted for whenever a background masker contains temporal fluctuations, and (2) caution needs to be taken when psychoacoustic theory on modulation masking is applied to speech recognition.     

Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise

Cochlear implants allow most patients with profound deafness to successfully communicate under optimal listening conditions. However, the amplitude modulation (AM) information provided by most implants is not sufficient for speech recognition in realistic settings where noise is typically present. This study added slowly varying frequency modulation (FM) to the existing algorithm of an implant simulation and used competing sentences to evaluate FM contributions to speech recognition in noise. Potential FM advantage was evaluated as a function of the number of spectral bands, FM depth, FM rate, and FM band distribution. Barring floor and ceiling effects, significant improvement was observed for all bands from 1 to 32 with the additional FM cue both in quiet and noise. Performance also improved with greater FM depth and rate, which might reflect resolved sidebands under the FM condition. Having FM present in low-frequency bands was more beneficial than in high-frequency bands, and only half of the bands required the presence of FM, regardless of position, to achieve performance similar to when all bands had the FM cue. These results provide insight into the relative contributions of AM and FM to speech communication and the potential advantage of incorporating FM for cochlear implant signal processing.     

The effect of modulation coherence on signal threshold in frequency-modulated noise bands

A series of four experiments was undertaken to ascertain whether signal threshold in frequency-modulated noise bands is dependent upon the coherence of modulation. The specific goal was to determine whether a masking release could be obtained with frequency modulation (FM), analogous to the comodulation masking release (CMR) phenomenon observed with amplitude modulation (AM). It was hypothesized that an across-frequency grouping process might give rise to such an effect. In experiments 1-3, maskers were composed of three noise bands centered on 1600, 2000, and 2400 Hz; these were either comodulated or noncomodulated with respect to both FM and AM. In experiment 1, the modulation was sinusoidal, and the signal was a 2000-Hz pure tone; in experiment 2, the modulation was random, and the signal was an FM noise band centered on 2000 Hz. The results obtained showed that, given sufficient width of modulation, thresholds were lower in a coherent FM masker than in an incoherent FM masker, regardless of the pattern of AM or signal type. However, thresholds in multiband maskers were usually elevated relative to that in a single-band masker centered on the signal. Experiment 3 demonstrated that coherent FM could be discriminated from incoherent FM. Experiment 4 gave similar patterns of results to the respective conditions of experiments 2 and 3, but for an inharmonic masker with bands centered on 1580, 2000, and 2532 Hz. While within-channel processes could not be entirely excluded from contributing to the present results, the experimental conditions were designed to be minimally conducive to such processes.     

Spectro-temporal envelope changes caused by temporal fine structure modification

The study of speech from which the temporal fine structure (TFS) has been removed has become an important research area. Common procedures for removing TFS include noise and tone vocoders. In the noise vocoder, bands of noise are modulated by the envelope of the speech within each band, and in the tone vocoder the carrier is a sinusoid at the center of each frequency band. Five different procedures for removing TFS are evaluated in this paper: the noise vocoder, a low-noise noise approach in which the noise envelope is replaced by the speech envelope in each frequency band, phase randomization within each band, the tone vocoder, and sinusoidal modeling with random phase. The effects of TFS modification on the speech envelope are evaluated using an index based on the envelope time-frequency modulation. The results show that for all of the TFS techniques implemented in this study, there is a substantial loss in the accuracy of reproduction of the envelope time-frequency modulation. The tone vocoder gives the best accuracy, followed by the procedure that replaces the noise envelope with the speech envelope in each band.     

External and internal limitations in amplitude-modulation processing

Three experiments are presented to explore the relative role of "external" signal variability and "internal" resolution limitations of the auditory system in the detection and discrimination of amplitude modulations (AM). In the first experiment, AM-depth discrimination performance was determined using sinusoidally modulated broadband-noise and pure-tone carriers. The AM index, m, of the standard ranged from -28 to -3 dB (expressed as 20 log m). AM-depth discrimination thresholds were found to be a fraction of the AM depth of the standard for standards down to -18 dB, in the case of the pure-tone carrier, and down to -8 dB, in the case of the broadband-noise carrier. For smaller standards, AM-depth discrimination required a fixed increase in AM depth, independent of the AM depth of the standard. In the second experiment, AM-detection thresholds were obtained for signal-modulation frequencies of 4, 16, 64, and 256 Hz, applied to either a band-limited random-noise carrier or a deterministic ("frozen") noise carrier, as a function of carrier bandwidth (8 to 2048 Hz). In general, detection thresholds were higher for the random- than for the frozen-noise carriers. For both carrier types, thresholds followed the pattern expected from frequency-selective processing of the stimulus envelope. The third experiment investigated AM masking at 4, 16, and 64 Hz in the presence of a narrow-band masker modulation. The variability of the masker was changed from entirely frozen to entirely random, while the long-term average envelope power spectrum was held constant. The experiment examined the validity of a long-term average quantity as the decision variable, and the role of memory in experiments with frozen-noise maskers. The empirical results were compared to predictions obtained with two modulation-filterbank models. The predictions revealed that AM-depth discrimination and AM detection are limited by a combination of the external signal variability and an internal "Weber-fraction" noise process.     

Enhancing Chinese tone recognition by manipulating amplitude envelope: implications for cochlear implants

Tone recognition is important for speech understanding in tonal languages such as Mandarin Chinese. Cochlear implant patients are able to perceive some tonal information by using temporal cues such as periodicity-related amplitude fluctuations and similarities between the fundamental frequency (F0) contour and the amplitude envelope. The present study investigates whether modifying the amplitude envelope to better resemble the F0 contour can further improve tone recognition in multichannel cochlear implants. Chinese tone and vowel recognition were measured for six native Chinese normal-hearing subjects listening to a simulation of a four-channel cochlear implant speech processor with and without amplitude envelope enhancement. Two algorithms were proposed to modify the amplitude envelope to more closely resemble the F0 contour. In the first algorithm, the amplitude envelope as well as the modulation depth of periodicity fluctuations was adjusted for each spectral channel. In the second algorithm, the overall amplitude envelope was adjusted before multichannel speech processing, thus reducing any local distortions to the speech spectral envelope. The results showed that both algorithms significantly improved Chinese tone recognition. By adjusting the overall amplitude envelope to match the F0 contour before multichannel processing, vowel recognition was better preserved and less speech-processing computation was required. The results suggest that modifying the amplitude envelope to more closely resemble the F0 contour may be a useful approach toward improving Chinese-speaking cochlear implant patients' tone recognition.