Some results on integral sum graphs

Let Z denote the set of all integers. The integral sum graph of a finite subset S of Z is the graph (S,E) with vertex set S and edge set E such that for u,vS, uvE if and only if u+vS. A graph G is called an integral sum graph if it is isomorphic to the integral sum graph of some finite subset S of Z. The integral sum number of a given graph G, denoted by ζ(G), is the smallest number of isolated vertices which when added to G result in an integral sum graph. Let x denote the least integer not less than the real x. In this paper, we (i) determine the value of ζ(K_n−E(K_r)) for r2n/3−1, (ii) obtain a lower bound for ζ(K_n−E(K_r)) when 2r<2n/3−1 and n5, showing by construction that the bound is sharp when r=2, and (iii) determine the value of ζ(K_r,r) for r2. These results provide partial solutions to two problems posed by Harary (Discrete Math. 124 (1994) 101–108). Finally, we furnish a counterexample to a result on the sum number of K_r,s given by Hartsfiedl and Smyth (Graphs and Matrices, R. Rees (Ed.), Marcel, Dekker, New York, 1992, pp. 205–211).     

Sum coloring and interval graphs: a tight upper bound for the minimum number of colors

The SUM COLORING problem consists of assigning a color c(v_i)Z⁺ to each vertex v_iV of a graph G=(V,E) so that adjacent nodes have different colors and the sum of the c(v_i)'s over all vertices v_iV is minimized. In this note we prove that the number of colors required to attain a minimum valued sum on arbitrary interval graphs does not exceed min{n;2χ(G)−1}. Examples from the papers [Discrete Math. 174 (1999) 125; Algorithmica 23 (1999) 109] show that the bound is tight.     

A comparison between the metric dimension and zero forcing number of trees and unicyclic graphs

The metric dimension dim(G)of a graph G is the minimum number of vertices such that every vertex of G is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the chosen vertices.The zero forcing number Z(G)of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a set S of black vertices(whereas vertices in V(G)\S are colored white)such that V(G)is turned black after finitely many applications of"the color-change rule":a white vertex is converted black if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex.We show that dim(T)≤Z(T)for a tree T,and that dim(G)≤Z(G)+1 if G is a unicyclic graph;along the way,we characterize trees T attaining dim(T)=Z(T).For a general graph G,we introduce the"cycle rank conjecture".We conclude with a proof of dim(T)-2≤dim(T+e)≤dim(T)+1 for e∈E(T).     

Profile minimization on triangulated triangles

Given graph G=(V,E) on n vertices, the profile minimization problem is to find a one-to-one function f:V→{1,2,…,n} such that ∑_vV(G){f(v)−min_xN[v] f(x)} is as small as possible, where N[v]={v}{x: x is adjacent to v} is the closed neighborhood of v in G. The trangulated triangle T_l is the graph whose vertices are the triples of non-negative integers summing to l, with an edge connecting two triples if they agree in one coordinate and differ by 1 in the other two coordinates. This paper provides a polynomial time algorithm to solve the profile minimization problem for trangulated triangles T_l with side-length l.     

Hamiltonian cycles in n-factor-critical graphs

A graph G is said to be n-factor-critical if G−S has a 1-factor for any SV(G) with |S|=n. In this paper, we prove that if G is a 2-connected n-factor-critical graph of order p with , then G is hamiltonian with some exceptions. To extend this theorem, we define a (k,n)-factor-critical graph to be a graph G such that G−S has a k-factor for any SV(G) with |S|=n. We conjecture that if G is a 2-connected (k,n)-factor-critical graph of order p with , then G is hamiltonian with some exceptions. In this paper, we characterize all such graphs that satisfy the assumption, but are not 1-tough. Using this, we verify the conjecture for k2.     

A note on minimum degree conditions for supereulerian graphs

A graph is called supereulerian if it has a spanning closed trail. Let G be a 2-edge-connected graph of order n such that each minimal edge cut SE(G) with |S|3 satisfies the property that each component of G−S has order at least (n−2)/5. We prove that either G is supereulerian or G belongs to one of two classes of exceptional graphs. Our results slightly improve earlier results of Catlin and Li. Furthermore, our main result implies the following strengthening of a theorem of Lai within the class of graphs with minimum degree δ4: If G is a 2-edge-connected graph of order n with δ(G)4 such that for every edge xyE(G) , we have max{d(x),d(y)}(n−2)/5−1, then either G is supereulerian or G belongs to one of two classes of exceptional graphs. We show that the condition δ(G)4 cannot be relaxed.     

All trees are 1-embeddable and all except stars are 2-embeddable

A graph G with n vertices is said to be embeddable (in its complement) if there is an automorphism φ of K_n such that E(G) ∩ E(φ(G))=. It is known that all trees T with n (≥2) vertices and T K_1,n−1 are embeddable. We say that G is 1-embeddable if, for every edge e, there is an automorphism φ of K_n such that E(G) ∩ E(φ(G))={e};and that it is 2-embeddable if,for every pair e₁, e₂ of edges, there is an automorphism φ of K_n such that E(G) ∩ E(φ(G))={e₁, e₂}. We prove here that all trees with n (3) vertices are 1-embeddable; and that all trees T with n (4) vertices and T K_1,n−1 are 2-embeddable. In a certain sense, this result is sharp.     

On neighborhood condition for graphs to have [a,b]-factors

Let G be a graph of order n, and let a and b be integers such that 1a<b. Let δ(G) be the minimum degree of G. Then we prove that if δ(G)(k−1)a, n(a+b)(k(a+b)−2)/b, and |N_G(x₁)N_G(x₂)N_G(x_k)|an/(a+b) for any independent subset {x₁,x₂,…,x_k} of V(G), where k2, then G has an [a,b]-factor. This result is best possible in some sense.     

Neighborhood unions and cyclability of graphs

A graph G is said to be cyclable if for each orientation of G, there exists a set S of vertices such that reversing all the arcs of with one end in S results in a hamiltonian digraph. Let G be a 3-connected graph of order n36. In this paper, we show that if for any three independent vertices x₁, x₂ and x₃, |N(x₁)N(x₂)|+|N(x₂)N(x₃)|+|N(x₃)N(x₁)|2n+1, then G is cyclable.     

The chromatic difference sequence of the Cartesian product of graphs

The chromatic difference sequence cds(G) of a graph G with chromatic number n is defined by cds(G) = (a(1), a(2),…, a(n)) if the sum of a(1), a(2),…, a(t) is the maximum number of vertices in an induced t-colorable subgraph of G for t = 1, 2,…, n. The Cartesian product of two graphs G and H, denoted by G□H, has the vertex set V(G□H = V(G) x V(H) and its edge set is given by (x₁, y₁)(x₂, y₂) ε E(G□H) if either x₁ = x₂ and y₁ y₂ ε E(H) or y₁ = y₂ and x₁x₂ ε E(G).

We obtained four main results: the cds of the product of bipartite graphs, the cds of the product of graphs with cds being nondrop flat and first-drop flat, the non-increasing theorem for powers of graphs and cds of powers of circulant graphs.     

Maximum number of edges in a critically k-connected graph

A k-connected graph G is said to be critically k-connected if G−v is not k-connected for any vV(G). We show that if n,k are integers with k4 and nk+2, and G is a critically k-connected graph of order n, then |E(G)|n(n−1)/2−p(n−k)+p²/2, where p=(n/k)+1 if n/k is an odd integer and p=n/k otherwise. We also characterize extremal graphs.     

Bounds on the number of isolates in sum graph labeling

A simple undirected graph H is called a sum graph if there is a labeling L of the vertices of H into distinct positive integers such that any two vertices u and v of H are adjacent if and only if there is a vertex w with label L(w)=L(u)+L(v). The sum number σ(G) of a graph G=(V,E) is the least integer r such that the graph H consisting of G and r isolated vertices is a sum graph. It is clear that σ(G)|E|. In this paper, we discuss general upper and lower bounds on the sum number. In particular, we prove that, over all graphs G=(V,E) with fixed |V|3 and |E|, the average of σ(G) is at least

Full-size image

. In other words, for most graphs, σ(G)Ω(|E|).     

No-hole L(2,1)-colorings

An L(2,1)-coloring of a graph G is a coloring of G's vertices with integers in {0,1,…,k} so that adjacent vertices’ colors differ by at least two and colors of distance-two vertices differ. We refer to an L(2,1)-coloring as a coloring. The span λ(G) of G is the smallest k for which G has a coloring, a span coloring is a coloring whose greatest color is λ(G), and the hole index ρ(G) of G is the minimum number of colors in {0,1,…,λ(G)} not used in a span coloring. We say that G is full-colorable if ρ(G)=0. More generally, a coloring of G is a no-hole coloring if it uses all colors between 0 and its maximum color. Both colorings and no-hole colorings were motivated by channel assignment problems. We define the no-hole span μ(G) of G as ∞ if G has no no-hole coloring; otherwise μ(G) is the minimum k for which G has a no-hole coloring using colors in {0,1,…,k}.

Let n denote the number of vertices of G, and let Δ be the maximum degree of vertices of G. Prior work shows that all non-star trees with Δ3 are full-colorable, all graphs G with n=λ(G)+1 are full-colorable, μ(G)λ(G)+ρ(G) if G is not full-colorable and nλ(G)+2, and G has a no-hole coloring if and only if nλ(G)+1. We prove two extremal results for colorings. First, for every m1 there is a G with ρ(G)=m and μ(G)=λ(G)+m. Second, for every m2 there is a connected G with λ(G)=2m, n=λ(G)+2 and ρ(G)=m.     

Some results on characterizing the edges of connected graphs with a given domination number

A dominating set for a graph G = (V, E) is a subset of vertices V′ V such that for all v ε V − V′ there exists some u ε V′ for which {v, u} ε E. The domination number of G is the size of its smallest dominating set(s). For a given graph G with minimum size dominating set D, let m₁ (G, D) denote the number of edges that have neither endpoint in D, and let m₂ (G, D) denote the number of edges that have at least one endpoint in D. We characterize the possible values that the pair (m₁ (G, D), m₂ (G, D)) can attain for connected graphs having a given domination number.     

Circular permutation graph family with applications

In a circular permutation diagram, there are two sets of terminals on two concentric circles: C_in and C_out. Given a permutation Π = [π₁, π₂, …, π_n], terminal i on C_in and terminal π_i on C_out are connected by a wire. The intersection graph G_c of a circular permutation diagram D_c is called a circular permutation graph of a permutation Π corresponding to the diagram D_c. The set of all circular permutation graphs of a permutation Π is called the circular permutation graph family of permutation Π. In this paper, we propose the following: (1) an O(V + E) time algorithm to check if a labeled graph G = (V, E) is a labeled circular permutation graph. (2) An O(n log n + nt) time algorithm to find a maximum independent set of a family, where n = Π and t is the cardinality of the output. (Number t in the worst case is O(n). However, if Π is uniformly distributed (and independent from i), its expected value is O(√n).) (3) An O(min(δV_clog logV_c,V_clogV_c) + E_c) time algorithm for finding a maximum independent set of a circular permutation diagram D_c, where δ is the minimum degree of vertices in the intersection graph G_c = (V_c,E_c) of D_c. (4) An O(n log log n) time algorithm for finding a maximum clique and the chromatic number of a circular permutation diagram, where n is the number of wires in the diagram.     

Graphs having distance-n domination number half their order

For any positive integer n and any graph G a set D of vertices of G is a distance-n dominating set, if every vertex vV(G)−D has exactly distance n to at least one vertex in D. The distance-n domination number γ_=n(G) is the smallest number of vertices in any distance-n dominating set. If G is a graph of order p and each vertex in G has distance n to at least one vertex in G, then the distance-n domination number has the upper bound p/2 as Ore's upper bound on the classical domination number. In this paper, a characterization is given for graphs having distance-n domination number equal to half their order, when the diameter is greater or equal 2n−1. With this result we confirm a conjecture of Boland, Haynes, and Lawson.     

On approximation intractability of the path–distance–width problem

Path–distance–width of a graph G=(V,E), denoted by pdw(G), is the minimum integer k satisfying that there is a nonempty subset of SV such that the number of the nodes with distance i from S is at most k for any nonnegative integer i. It is known that given a positive integer k and a graph G, the decision problem pdw(G)k is NP-complete even if G is a tree (Yamazaki et al. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1203, Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp. 276–287). In this paper, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate the path–distance–width of a graph within a ratio for any >0, even for trees.     

The integrity of a cubic graph

Integrity, a measure of network reliability, is defined as

where G is a graph with vertex set V and m(G−S) denotes the order of the largest component of G−S. We prove an upper bound of the following form on the integrity of any cubic graph with n vertices:

Moreover, there exist an infinite family of connected cubic graphs whose integrity satisfies a linear lower bound I(G)>βn for some constant β. We provide a value for β, but it is likely not best possible. To prove the upper bound we first solve the following extremal problem. What is the least number of vertices in a cubic graph whose removal results in an acyclic graph? The solution (with a few minor exceptions) is that n/3 vertices suffice and this is best possible.     

Subgraph distances in graphs defined by edge transfers

For two edge-induced subgraphs F and H of the same size in a graph G, the subgraph H can be obtained from F by an edge jump if there exist four distinct vertices u, v, w, and x in G such that uv ε E(F), wx ε E(G) - E(F), and H = F - uv + wx. The subgraph F is j-transformed into H if H can be obtained from F by a sequence of edge jumps. Necessary and sufficient conditions are presented for a graph G to have the property that every edge-induced subgraph of a fixed size in G can be j-transformed into every other edge-induced subgraph of that size. The minimum number of edge jumps required to transform one subgraph into another is called the jump distance. This distance is a metric and can be modeled by a graph. The jump graph J(G) of a graph G is defined as that graph whose vertices are the edges of G and where two vertices of J(G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding edges of G are independent. For a given graph G, we consider the sequence {{J^k(G)}} of iterated jump graphs and classify each graph as having a convergent, divergent, or terminating sequence.     

Magic Labeling of Disjoint Union Graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex set V (G), edge set E(G) and maximum degree Δ respectively. G is called degree-magic if it admits a labelling of the edges by integers {1, 2, …,|E(G)|} such that for any vertex v the sum of the labels of the edges incident with v is equal to (1+|E(G)|)/2·d(v), where d(v) is the degree of v. Let f be a proper edge coloring of G such that for each vertex v ∈ V (G),|{e:e ∈ E_v, f(e) ≤ Δ/2}|=|{e:e ∈ E_v, f(e) > Δ/2}|, and such an f is called a balanced edge coloring of G. In this paper, we show that if G is a supermagic even graph with a balanced edge coloring and m ≥ 1, then (2m + 1)G is a supermagic graph. If G is a d-magic even graph with a balanced edge coloring and n ≥ 2, then nG is a d-magic graph. Results in this paper generalise some known results.