4‐Pyridone–terephthalic acid–water (2/1/2) and bis(3‐hydroxypyridinium) terephthalate

4‐Hydroxypyridine and terephthalic acid cocrystallize as a hydrate, 4‐pyridone–terephthalic acid–water (2/1/2), 2C₅H₅NO·C₈H₆O₄·2H₂O, from a methanol–water solution. The molecules form a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network resulting in sheets of hydrogen‐bonded molecules that lie parallel to the (10) plane. In contrast, 3‐hydroxypyridine and terephthalic acid form the salt bis(3‐hydroxypyridinium) terephthalate, 2C₅H₆NO⁺·C₈H₄O₄²⁻, giving rise to two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheets extending through the lattice parallel to the (10) plane.     

2‐Aminopyridinium–succinate–succinic acid (2/1/1)

In the title compound, 2C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₄O₄^2?·C₄H₆O₄, cyclic eight‐membered hydrogen‐bonded rings exist involving 2‐amino­pyridinium and succinate ions. The succinic acid and succinate moieties lie on inversion centres. Succinic acid mol­ecules and succinate ions are linked into zigzag chains by O—H?O hydrogen bonds, with O?O distances of 2.6005 (16) Å.     

2‐Amino­pyridinium–fumarate–fumaric acid (2/1/1)

The title complex, 2C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₂O₄²⁻·C₄H₄O₄, contains cyclic eight‐membered hydrogen‐bonded rings involving 2‐­aminopyridinium and fumarate ions. The fumaric acid mol­ecules and fumarate ions lie on inversion centers and are linked into zigzag chains by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The dihedral angle between the pyridinium ring and the hydrogen‐bonded fumarate ion is 7.60 (4)°. The fumarate anion is linked to the pyridinium cations by intermolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The heterocycle is fully protonated, thus enabling amine–imine tautomerization.     

The gossypol–cyclo­dodecanone (1/2) inclusion complex

Gossypol and cyclo­dodecanone crystallize at room temperature as an inclusion complex in a 1:2 molar ratio. This complex, viz. 1,1′,6,6′,7,7′‐hexa­hydroxy‐5,5′‐diiso­pro­pyl‐3,3′‐di­methyl‐2,2′‐bi­naphthalene‐8,8′‐di­carbox­aldehyde–cyclo­do­deca­none (1/2), C₃₀H₃₀O₈·2C₁₂H₂₂O, is unusual in that there is limited intermolecular hydrogen bonding within the structure. Each cyclo­dodecanone mol­ecule accepts a hydrogen bond from a gossypol mol­ecule, but there are no gossypol‐to‐gossypol hydrogen‐bond interactions. The gossypol mol­ecules form a framework structure enclosing channels, and the cyclo­dodecanone mol­ecules lie in these channels. In terms of the number of non‐H guest atoms, this is the largest gossypol inclusion complex reported to date.     

The cocrystal nicotinamide–succinic acid (2/1)

In the asymmetric unit of the crystal structure of nicotinamide–succinic acid (2/1), 2C₆H₆N₂O·C₄H₆O₄, there are two independent nicotinamide molecules in general positions and two half succinic acid molecules which lie about inversion centres. The structure contains acid–pyridine and amide–amide synthons with nicotinamide molecules forming ladders of alternating R₂²(8) and R₄²(8) rings linked through succinic acid to generate a corrugated hydrogen‐bonded sheet. This sheet is a common supramolecular unit found in other 2:1 nicotinamide–dicarboxylic acid cocrystals, but the presence of two crystallographically distinct nicotinamides with anti and syn conformations, forming two distinct sheets within the same structure, is a novel packing feature in this type of material.     

Supramolecular interactions in the 2,6‐bis(benzimidazol‐2‐yl)pyridine–terephthalic acid–water (2/1/4) cocrystal

In the title compound, 2C₁₉H₁₃N₅·C₈H₆O₄·4H₂O, the terephthalic acid molecule lies on a crystallographic inversion centre and the H atoms of one water molecule exhibit disorder. The maximum deviation of any atom from the mean plane through the C and N atoms of the 2,6‐bis(benzimidazol‐2‐yl)pyridine molecule is only 0.161 (4) Å. In the crystal structure, the water molecules play an important role in linking the other molecules via hydrogen bonding. The structure forms a three‐dimensional framework via strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding. In addition, there are π–π stacking interactions between the imidazole, pyridine and benzene rings.     

2‐Aminopyrimidine–3,3,3‐triphenylpropanoic acid (1/1)

The title bimolecular compound, C₄H₅N₃·C₂₁H₁₈O₂, constructed from 2‐aminopyrimidine and 3,3,3‐triphenylpropanoic acid, forms a tetramolecular hydrogen‐bonded motif via O—H...N, N—H...O and N—H...N contacts. This aggregate organizes to give crystal‐packing motifs with hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions.     

Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the guanidinium salts of the monocyclic dicarboxylic acids rac‐trans‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐dicarboxylic acid (2:1, anhydrous), isophthalic acid (1:1, monohydrate) and terephthalic acid (2:1, trihydrate)

The structures of bis(guanidinium) rac‐trans‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐dicarboxylate, 2CH₆N₃⁺·C₈H₁₀O₄²⁻, (I), guanidinium 3‐carboxybenzoate monohydrate, CH₆N₃⁺·C₈H₅O₄⁻·H₂O, (II), and bis(guanidinium) benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate trihydrate, 2CH₆N₃⁺·C₈H₄O₄²⁻·3H₂O, (III), all reveal three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded framework structures. In anhydrous (I), both guanidinium cations form classic cyclic R₂²(8) N—H...O,O′_carboxylate and asymmetric cyclic R₂¹(6) hydrogen‐bonding interactions, while one cation forms an unusual enlarged cyclic interaction with O‐atom acceptors of separate ortho‐related carboxylate groups [graph set R₂²(11)]. Cations and anions also associate across inversion centres, giving cyclic R₄²(8) motifs. In the 1:1 guanidinium salt, (II), the cation forms two separate cyclic R₂¹(6) interactions, one with a carboxyl O‐atom acceptor and the other with the solvent water molecule. The structure is unusual in that both carboxyl groups form short interanion O...H...O contacts, one across a crystallographic inversion centre [O...O = 2.483 (2) Å] and the other about a twofold axis of rotation [O...O = 2.462 (2) Å], representing shared sites on these elements for the single acid H atom. The water molecule links the cation–anion ribbon structures into a three‐dimensional framework. In (III), the repeating molecular unit comprises a benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate dianion which lies across a crystallographic inversion centre, two guanidinium cations and two solvent water molecules (each set related by twofold rotational symmetry), and a single water molecule which lies on a twofold axis. Each guanidinium cation forms three types of cyclic interaction with the dianions: one R₂¹(6), the others R₃²(8) and R₃³(10) (both of these involving the water molecules), giving a three‐dimensional structure through bridges down the b‐cell direction. The water molecule at the general site also forms an unusual cyclic R₂²(4) homodimeric association across an inversion centre [O...O = 2.875 (2) Å]. The work described here provides further examples of the common cyclic guanidinium–carboxylate hydrogen‐bonding associations, as well as featuring other less common cyclic motifs.     

Berberine formate–succinic acid (1/1)

The title compound [systematic name: 9,10‐di­methoxy‐2,3‐methyl­ene­dioxy‐5,6‐di­hydro­dibenzo­[a,g]­quinolizinium form­ate–succinic acid (1/1)], C₂₀H₁₈NO₄⁺·CHO₂⁻·C₄H₆O₄, con­tains centrosymmetric pairs of almost planar berberine cations, and hydrogen‐bonded (C₄H₆O₄⋯HCOO⁻)₂ rings of succinic acid with formate anions, bonded by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds with O⋯O distances of 2.4886 (15) and 2.5652 (16) Å. Pairs of cations and mol­ecules of succinic acid are connected by non‐conventional weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, with C⋯O distances of 3.082 (2) and 3.178 (2) Å.     

Hydrogen bonding in 1,2‐diazine–chloranilic acid (2/1) and 1,4‐diazine–chloranilic acid (2/1) determined at 110 K

The crystal structures of the isomeric title compounds [systematic names: pyridazine–2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐dihydroxy‐p‐benzoquinone (2/1), (I), and pyrazine–2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐dihydroxy‐p‐benzoquinone (2/1), (II)], 2C₄H₄N₂·C₆H₂Cl₂O₄, have been redetermined at 110 K. The H atom in the intermolecular O...H...N hydrogen bond in each compound was revealed to be disordered; the relative occupancies at the O and N sites are 0.33 (3) and 0.67 (3), respectively, for (I), and 0.56 (4) and 0.44 (4) for (II). The formal charges of the chloranilic acid in (I) and (II) estimated from the occupancy factors are ca−1.3 and −0.8, respectively. The geometries of the centrosymmetric chloranilic acid molecule in (I) and (II) are compared with the neutral, monoanionic and dianionic forms of chloranilic acid optimized by density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6–311+G(3df,2p) level. The result implies that the chloranilic acid molecule in (I) is close to the monoanionic state, while that in (II) is between neutral and monoanionic, consistent with the result derived from the H‐atom occupancies.