水中挥发性有机物分析前处理技术研究进展

环境水体中挥发性有机物(VOCs)的种类繁多,含量在(ng/L～μg/L)范围内。本文总结了2003年以来测定水样中VOCs的8种前处理技术,包括顶空单液滴微萃取(HS-SDME)、中空纤维液相微萃取(HF-LPME)、分散液液微萃取(DLLME)、顶空固相微萃取(HS-SPME)、搅拌棒吸附萃取(SBSE)、静态顶空(HS)、吹扫捕集法(P&T)和针式毛细管吸附阱(INCAT)的进展情况。比较了它们的优缺点,并展望了VOCs的分析方法。     

挥发性有机物在3种采样装置中的稳定性

详细研究了50种挥发性有机物在Summa采样罐、Teldar采样袋和铝箔采样袋中的稳定性。Summa采样罐适合采集所有50种有机化合物；Teldar采样袋适合采集沸点低于150℃的有机物；铝箔采样袋适合采集沸点低于60℃的有机物。3种采样装置对有机物的吸附能力与有机物的沸点呈线性负相关。铝箔采样袋的吸附方程斜率的绝对值最大；其次是Teldar采样袋；最少是Summa采样罐。     

挥发性有机物在3种采样装置中的稳定性

详细研究了50种挥发性有机物在Summa采样罐、Teldar采样袋和铝箔采样袋中的稳定性.Summa采样罐适合采集所有50种有机化合物;Teldar采样袋适合采集沸点低于150℃的有机物;铝箔采样袋适合采集沸点低于60℃的有机物.3种采样装置对有机物的吸附能力与有机物的沸点呈线性负相关.铝箔采样袋的吸附方程斜率的绝对值最大;其次是Teldar采样袋;最少是Summa采样罐.     

GC/MS技术分析烟草挥发性、半挥发性酸性成分

烟草中挥发性、半挥发性酸性成分对烟草的香、味有明显的影响作用。常用的分析方法是先把烟草中的酸性成分提取出来,进行酯化后,再进行气相色谱分析。随着新型毛细管柱的出现,使得烟草萃取液经酸碱分离后,不经衍生化直接进样测试挥发性、半挥发性酸性成分成为可能。本实验应用GC/MS技术,对烟草中的挥发性、半挥发性酸性成分,不经酸碱分     

汞形态分析中的前处理技术

对近二十年来汞的分离富集技术进行了回顾，并对不同基体样品的分离富集方法进行了总结。     

饮用水中挥发性有机物(VOCs)的GC-MS分析

用顶空－毛细管气相色谱－质谱联用仪测定了北京主要区域的自来水,北京目前市场销售的瓶装饮用水（包括天然矿泉水,纯净水等）中２３种挥发性有机物（ＶＯＣｓ）（包括有机氯化物,有机溴代物及苯系物等）的浓度,并与其它城市（如天津,上海,兰州等地）的自来水中ＶＯＣｓ的浓度进行了比较,结果表明北京市区内自来水及大多数市售瓶瓶饮用水中ＶＯＣｓ含量很低。     

绿色分析化学技术研究进展

绿色分析化学是受到广泛关注的一门前沿科学,它是把绿色化学的基本原理应用在新的分析方法和技术方面.对绿色分析样品前处理技术、绿色分析分离富集技术和绿色分析测试技术进行了综述.     

基于呼出气挥发性有机物检测的肺癌筛查技术研究进展

肺癌已成为当前全球发病率和死亡率最高的癌症.早期肺癌的治愈率高,"早诊早治"已成为共识.呼出气检测具有非侵入性、取样方便且对人体友好的优势,通过对呼出气中特征代谢物的检测,寻找早期肺癌的疾病标志物,有望作为一种简单有效的早期肺癌筛查手段而备受关注.本文从临床常用肺癌筛查方法、呼出气组分及肺癌标志性挥发性有机物(VOCs...     

兽药残留分析中样品前处理技术研究进展

样品前处理是兽药残留分析中的关键步骤,直接影响检测的结果.近年来,出现了一些新的样品前处理技术,如固相萃取、基质固相分散萃取、固相微萃取、搅拌棒吸附萃取、膜萃取、液相微萃取、超临界流体萃取、加速溶剂萃取、分子印迹、微波辅助萃取.这些技术能够有效地减少分析过程中由样品前处理过程带来的误差,具有前处理快速、简便的优点,同时可与分析仪器联用,实现分析的自动化.本文对这些新技术的基本原理、特点及在兽药残留分析中的应用进行了综述,并对样品前处理的前景进行了展望.     

新型单壁碳纳米管采样吸附剂性能的评价

研究了单壁碳纳米管(SWCNTs)作为新型采样吸附剂的性能和效果,并应用于空气中挥发性有机化合物的分析测定。结果表明,单壁碳纳米管具有较大的比表面积,与经典Tenax TA吸附剂相比,对低碳数挥发性强的有机化合物回收率高,有更强的吸附能力;空白实验表明,SWCNTs易获得较低本底,具有化学惰性和疏水特性,采样时水的干扰小。当湿度增加时在误差允许的范围内准确度不受影响;实验测定具有较大的穿透容量和安全采样体积。将单壁碳纳米管吸附剂实际应用于大气中挥发性有机化合物的测定,通过与经典吸附剂Tenax TA相比,更适于采集大气中的挥发性有机化合物。     

An Overview on Truffle Aroma and Main Volatile Compounds

Truffles are underground edible fungi that grow symbiotically with plant roots. They have been globally considered as one of the most expensive foods because of their rarity, unique aroma, and high nutritional value as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, hepatoprotective, anti-mutagenic, antituberculoid immunomodulatory, antitumor, antimicrobial, and aphrodisiac. The unique flavor and fragrance of truffles is one of the main reasons to get worldwide attraction as a food product. So, the aim of this review was to summarize the relevant literature with particular attention to the active aroma components as well as the various sample preparation and analytical techniques used to identify them. The major analytical methods used for the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in truffles are gas chromatography (GC), proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS), and electronic nose sensing (EN). In addition, factors influencing truffle aroma are also highlighted. For this reason, this review can be considered a good reference for research concerning aroma profiles of different species of truffles to deepen the knowledge about a complex odor of various truffles.     

Microanalysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Water Samples – Methods and Instruments

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), due to their toxicity and persistence in the environment, are particularly important pollutants. Some of these compounds are mutagens, teratogens or carcinogens, while others are responsible for the degradation of organoleptic parameters such as taste and odour of water. This review focuses on a number of key procedural steps in the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in water samples. A wide spectrum of techniques for the isolation and preconcentration of the aforementioned pollutants for trace organic analysis by gas chromatography are presented and discussed. The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed and novel developments are also taken into consideration.     

静态顶空-气相色谱/质谱法同时检测环境水体中59种挥发性有机物

静态顶空法是一种简单、环保的样品前处理方法.通过对比试验,优化了影响静态顶空进样方法灵敏度的主要因素,确定了较佳的样品盐度(40%)、平衡温度(80℃)、平衡时间(10 min)、平衡压力(0.103 4 MPa)、定量环平衡时间(20 s)、进样时间(3 min)等前处理方法参数.采用优化后水样前处理条件及1.00 k V的检测器电压,59种挥发性有机物在特定的线性范围内,标准曲线线性相关系数均大于0.998,方法检出限为丙烯腈4.4μg/L、硝基苯7.6μg/L,其余挥发性有机物(VOCs)介于0.06~1.4μg/L,饮用水源水及污水处理厂进水实际样品加标回收率为60%~110%,精密度(RSD)为0.33%~22%(n=6).建立的静态顶空-气相色谱/质谱法(HS-GC/MS)水样前处理过程自动化,可同时对水中59种挥发性有机物进行检测.     

沸石分子筛及其负载型催化剂去除VOCs研究进展

挥发性有机物（VOCs）的排放对自然环境、人类健康产生了严重危害,吸附法和催化氧化法是治理VOCs的有效方法.沸石分子筛含有丰富的微孔,比表面积大,且含有较多的酸位点,具有一定的催化活性,十分适合作为催化剂载体材料,被广泛应用于分离、吸附及催化等领域.本文综述了不同沸石分子筛吸附去除及沸石基负载型催化剂催化氧化去除烷烃、芳香烃、醛类、酮类、酸类、酯类、醇类及氯代烃等VOCs的研究进展.分析表明,沸石吸附剂的孔道结构、硅铝比、表面物理化学性质,VOCs种类、极性、亲水性,对沸石分子筛吸附性能影响较大;沸石载体表面酸碱度,催化剂活性组分种类、分散性,VOCs种类等是影响负载型催化剂催化活性的重要因素;沸石载体和活性组分之间存在协同作用,赋予了负载型催化剂优异的催化活性.沸石负载贵金属催化剂对各类VOCs的催化氧化性能优于沸石负载金属氧化物催化剂,但贵金属价格昂贵,成本较高,通过合理设计多组分金属氧化物催化剂,可显著提高负载型催化剂的催化活性.此外,本文对沸石分子筛及其负载型催化剂去除VOCs的未来研究方向进行了展望.     

热解吸-气相色谱法测定植物源挥发性有机物

以Tenax-TA、Carboxen 1000和Carbosieve SⅢ为采样管填充料,将植物源挥发性有机物吸附于采样管内,样品通过二次热解吸仪解吸后,随载气进入气相色谱仪,采用氢火焰离子化检测器(FID)测定,建立了利用二次热解吸仪与气相色谱联用技术测定植物挥发性有机物的分析方法。载气N2流速为30 mL/min,60℃下吹扫吸附管2 min,然后在250℃下解吸吸附管5 min,冷却1 min后,在275℃下解吸聚焦管3 min,样品经传输线进入气相色谱。气相色谱载气N2压力为190 kPa,FID检测器温度280℃;进样口温度225℃;初始柱温40℃,停留5 min,以2℃/min升温至120℃,保留1 min,然后以20℃/min升温至200℃,保留10 min。方法重现性好,精密度高,线性相关系数大于0.99;检出限均低于9×10-9g/L;解吸效率大于96%,适用于植物源挥发性有机物的测定。     

Evaluation of a Continuous Composite Sampler for Volatile Organic Compounds in Water

Abstract

The high volatility and low water solubility of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), make the collection of representative samples difficult. The standard grab sampling method only gives information of that moment in time when the sample is taken. When the composition of VOCs is varying, continuous composite sampling will give a more representative sample. However, no thorough evaluation of its use for VOCs has been reported.

The use of an automatic continuous composite sampler for the analysis of VOCs in water was studied. The causes and magnitude of the VOCs losses during the sampling process were determined.

Adsorbent cartridges were used to trap the VOCs escaping from solution during the sampling process. Sorption phenomena occurring on the containers and/or tubings were also evaluated. Sorption losses were much more significant than volatilization losses.

The results indicate that a modified version of this sampler can be an alternative for the long term sampling of water for VOC analysis.     

Comparison of Extraction Techniques for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Liverwort Samples

This article focuses on the comparison of four popular techniques for the extraction of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from liverworts of the Calypogeia azurea species. Since extraction is the most important step in the sample analysis of ingredients present in botanical preparations, their strengths, and weaknesses are discussed. In order to determine the VOCs present in plants, selecting the appropriate one is a key step of the extraction technique. Extraction should ensure the isolation of all components present in the oily bodies of Calypogeia azurea without the formation of any artifacts during treatment. The best extraction method should yield the determined compounds in detectable amounts. Hydrodistillation (HD), applying Deryng apparatus and solid-liquid extraction (SLE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) were used for volatile extraction. The extracts obtained were analysed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to determine the compounds.     

Optimization of SPME-Arrow-GC/MS Method for Determination of Free and Bound Volatile Organic Compounds from Grape Skins

(1) Background: Solid phase microextraction (SPME)-Arrow is a new extraction technology recently employed in the analysis of volatiles in food materials. Grape volatile organic compounds (VOC) have a crucial role in the winemaking industry due to their sensory characteristics of wine.; (2) Methods: Box–Behnken experimental design and response surface methodology were used to optimise SPME-Arrow conditions (extraction temperature, incubation time, exposure time, desorption time). Analyzed VOCs were free VOCs directly from grape skins and bound VOCs released from grape skins by acid hydrolysis.; (3) Results: The most significant factors were extraction temperature and exposure time for both free and bound VOCs. For both factors, an increase in their values positively affected the extraction efficiency for almost all classes of VOCs. For free VOCs, the optimum extraction conditions are: extraction temperature 60 °C, incubation time 20 min, exposure time 49 min, and desorption time 7 min, while for the bound VOCs are: extraction temperature 60 °C, incubation time 20 min, exposure time 60 min, desorption time 7 min.; (4) Conclusions: Application of the optimized method provides a powerful tool in the analysis of major classes of volatile organic compounds from grape skins, which can be applied to a large number of samples.