Mechanism of protonation of [Pt(3)(mu-PBu(t)(2))3(H)(CO)2], yielding the hydride-bridged [Pt(3)(mu-PBu(t)(2))2(mu-H)(PBu(t)(2)H)(CO)2]OTf (Tf=CF(3)SO(2)), and the spectroscopic and theoretical characterization of a kinetic intermediate

The reaction of the Pt(I)Pt(I)Pt(II) triangulo cluster Pt(3)(micro-PBu(t)()(2))(3)(H)(CO)(2) (1) with TfOH (Tf = CF(3)SO(2)) affords the hydride-bridged cationic derivative [Pt(3)(mu-PBu(t)()(2))(2)(mu-H)(PBu(t)()(2)H)(CO)(2)]OTf (2). With TfOD the reaction gives selectively [Pt(3)(mu-PBu(t)(2))(2)(mu-D)(PBu(t)(2)H)(CO)(2)]OTf (2-D(1)), implying that the proton is transferred to a metal center while a P-H bond is formed by the reductive coupling of one of the bridging phosphides and the terminal hydride ligand of the reagent. The reaction proceeds through the formation of a thermally unstable kinetic intermediate which was characterized at low temperatures, and was suggested to be the CO-hydrogen-bonded (or protonated) [Pt(3)(mu-PBu(t)(2))(3)(H)(CO)(2)].HOTf (3). An ab initio theoretical study predicts a hydrogen-bonded complex or a proton-transfer tight ion pair as a possible candidate for the structure of the kinetic intermediate.     

Theoretical investigation of water gas shift reaction catalyzed by iron group carbonyl complexes M(CO)5 (M = Fe, Ru, Os)

We have investigated the mechanism of M(CO)(5) (M = Fe, Ru, Os) catalyzed water gas shift reaction (WGSR) by using density functional theory and ab initio calculations. Our calculation results indicate that the whole reaction cycle consists of six steps: 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6 → 2. In this stepwise mechanism the metals Fe, Ru, and Os behave generally in a similar way. However, crucial differences appear in steps 3 → 4 → 5 which involve dihydride M(H)(2)(CO)(3)COOH(-) (4') and/or dihydrogen complex MH(2)(CO)(3)COOH(-) (4). The stability of the dihydrogen complexes becomes weaker down the iron group. The dihydrogen complex 4_Fe is only 11.1 kJ/mol less stable than its dihydride 4'_Fe at the B3LYP/II(f)++//B3LYP/II(f) level. Due to very low energy barrier it is very easy to realize the transform from 4_Fe to 4'_Fe and vice versa, and thus for Fe there is no substantial difference to differentiate 4 and 4' for the reaction cycle. The most possible key intermediate 4'_Ru is 38.2 kJ/mol more stable than 4_Ru. However, the barrier for the conversion 3_Ru → 4'_Ru is 23.8 kJ/mol higher than that for 3_Ru → 4_Ru. Additionally, 4'_Ru has to go through 4_Ru to complete dehydrogenation 4'_Ru → 5_Ru. The concerted mechanism 4'_Ru → 6_Ru, in which the CO group attacks ruthenium while H(2) dissociates, can be excluded. In contrast to Fe and Ru, the dihydrogen complex of Os is too unstable to exist at the level of theory. Moreover, we predict Fe and Ru species are more favorable than Os species for the WGSR, because the energy barriers for the 4 → 5 processes of Fe and Ru are only 38.9 and 16.2 kJ/mol, respectively, whereas 140.5 kJ/mol is calculated for the conversion 4' → 5 of Os, which is significantly higher. In general, the calculations are in good agreement with available experimental data. We hope that our work will be beneficial to the development and design of the WGSR catalyst with high performance.     

Substitution reactions of [Ru(dppe)(CO)(H(2)O)(3)][OTf](2)

The labile nature of the coordinated water ligands in the organometallic aqua complex [Ru(dppe)(CO)(H(2)O)(3)][OTf](2) (1) (dppe = Ph(2)PCH(2)CH(2)PPh(2); OTf = OSO(2)CF(3)) has been investigated through substitution reactions with a range of incoming ligands. Dissolution of 1 in acetonitrile or dimethyl sulfoxide results in the facile displacement of all three waters to give [Ru(dppe)(CO)(CH(3)CN)(3)][OTf](2) (2) and [Ru(dppe)(CO)(DMSO)(3)][OTf](2) (3), respectively. Similarly, 1 reacts with Me(3)CNC to afford [Ru(dppe)(CO)(CNCMe(3))(3)][OTf](2) (4). Addition of 1 equiv of 2,2'-bipyridyl (bpy) or 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridyl (Me(2)bpy) to acetone/water solutions of 1 initially yields [Ru(dppe)(CO)(H(2)O)(bpy)][OTf](2) (5a) and [Ru(dppe)(CO)(H(2)O)(Me(2)bpy)][OTf](2) (6a), in which the coordinated water lies trans to CO. Compounds 5a and 6a rapidly rearrange to isomeric species (5b, 6b) in which the ligated water is trans to dppe. Further reactivity has been demonstrated for 6b, which, upon dissolution in CDCl(3), loses water and coordinates a triflate anion to afford [Ru(dppe)(CO)(OTf)(Me(2)bpy)][OTf] (7). Reaction of 1 with CH(3)CH(2)CH(2)SH gives the dinuclear bridging thiolate complex [[(dppe)Ru(CO)](2)(mu-SCH(2)CH(2)CH(3))(3)][OTf] (8). The reaction of 1 with CO in acetone/water is slow and yields the cationic hydride complex [Ru(dppe)(CO)(3)H][OTf] (9) via a water gas shift reaction. Moreover, the same mechanism can also be used to account for the previously reported synthesis of 1 upon reaction of Ru(dppe)(CO)(2)(OTf)(2) with water (Organometallics 1999, 18, 4068).     

Dihydrogen activation by a diruthenium analogue of the Fe-only hydrogenase active site

The photochemical reaction of Ru2(S2C3H6)(CO)4(PCy3)2 (1) and H2 gives the dihydride Ru2(S2C3H6)(mu-H)(H)(CO)3(PCy3)2 (2). NMR and crystallographic studies reveal mutually trans basal phosphine ligands and both bridging and terminal hydrides. Ru2(S2C2H4)(CO)4(PCy3)2 behaves similarly. Other HX substrates undergo photoaddition to 1, affording Ru2(S2C3H6)(mu-H)(X)(CO)3(PCy3)2 for X = OTs (3a), Cl (3b), and SPh (3c). Treatment of Ru2(S2C3H6)(mu-H)(H)(CO)3(PCy3)2 with [H(OEt2)]BArF4 (ArF = B(C6H3-3,5-(CF3)2) in CD2Cl2 gives [Ru2(S2C3H6)(mu-H)(CO)3(PCy3)2(H2)]+ (4), which catalyzes H2-D2 exchange. The reaction of 2 with [D(OEt2)]BArF4 gave [Ru2(S2C3H6)(mu-H)(CO)3(PCy3)2(HD)]+ (JH-D = 31 Hz). These studies provide the first models for the Fe-only hydrogenases that bear dihydrogen and terminal hydrido ligands.     

Reactions of (PCP)Ru(CO)(NHPh)(PMe3) (PCP = 2,6-(CH2PtBu2)2C6H3) with substrates that possess polar bonds

The Ru(II) amido complex (PCP)Ru(CO)(PMe(3))(NHPh) (1) (PCP = 2,6-(CH(2)P(t)Bu(2))(2)C(6)H(3)) reacts with compounds that possess polar C=N, C triple bond N, or C=O bonds (e.g., nitriles, carbodiimides, or isocyanates) to produce four-membered heterometallacycles that result from nucleophilic addition of the amido nitrogen to an unsaturated carbon of the organic substrate. Based on studies of the reaction of complex 1 with acetonitrile, the transformations are suggested to proceed by dissociation of trimethylphosphine, followed by coordination of the organic substrate and then intramolecular N-C bond formation. In the presence of ROH (R = H or Me), the fluorinated amidinate complex (PCP)Ru(CO)(N(Ph)C(C(6)F(5))NH) (6) reacts with excess pentafluorobenzonitrile to produce (PCP)Ru(CO)(F)(N(H)C(C(6)F(5))NHPh) (7). The reaction with MeOH also produces o-MeOC(6)F(4)CN (>90%) and p-MeOC(6)F(4)CN (<10%). Details of the solid-state structures of (PCP)Ru(CO)(F)(N(H)C(C(6)F(5))NHPh) (7), (PCP)Ru(CO)[PhNC{NH(hx)}N(hx)] (8), (PCP)Ru(CO){N(Ph)C(NHPh)O} (9), and (PCP)Ru(CO){OC(Ph)N(Ph)} (10) are reported.     

An iron(II) dihydrogen hydrido complex containing the tripodal tetraphosphine ligand P(CH2CH2PMe2)3

The dihydrogen hydrido complex [FeH(H2)(PP3)]+ 1 (PP3 = P(CH2CH2PMe2)3 2) was formed by the protonation of the dihydrido complex FeH2(PP3) 3 with methanol or ethanol. The observation of H-D coupling in partially deuterated isotopomers of 1 and measurement of T1 relaxation times for the hydrido and dihydrogen resonances of 1 confirmed the presence of the eta2-dihydrogen ligand. Complex 1 shows dynamic NMR behaviour in both the 31P and 1H NMR spectra with facile exchange between the protons in the eta2-dihydrogen ligand and the eta1-hydrido ligand. The dihydrogen ligand of 1 is easily displaced by both anionic and neutral ligands to afford the corresponding hydrido complexes [FeHX(PP3)]+ (X = CO 11, X = PPh3 12) or FeHX(PP3)(X = Cl 13, X = Br 14, X = I 15, X = N3 16). Small quantities of the alkoxy hydrido complexes FeH(OR)(PP3)(R = Me 4; R = Et 5) are observed in methanol and ethanol solutions containing 1. In methanol solution, FeH(OMe)(PP3) 4 reacts to form the carbonyl hydrido complex [FeH(CO)(PP3)]+ 11 and isotopic labelling confirms that the carbonyl ligand of 11 is derived from the methanol solvent. The mechanism of methanol oxidation presumably proceeds through beta-hydride elimination from FeH(OMe)(PP3) to produce formaldehyde as an intermediate which is further dehydrogenated to form the carbonyl ligand. [FeH(H2)(PP3)]+ 1 and FeHCl(PP3) 13 react rapidly with paraformaldehyde to also form [FeH(CO)(PP3)]+ 11. Complex 11 also decarbonylates acetaldehyde to afford the methyl carbonyl complex [FeMe(CO)(PP3)]+ 17. The structure of 17 was confirmed by X-ray crystallography.     

α-酯甲基硫桥羰基铁配合物(μ-RS)[μ-EtO<(O)CH2S]-Fe2(CO)6的合成及构象分析

通过μ-S2Fe2(CO)6的S-S键被Grignard试剂的还原断裂反应及中间物(μ-RS)(μ-XMgS)Fe2(CO)6(2)对氯代乙酸乙酯的亲核取代反应,合成了一系列铁硫原子簇配合物(μ-RS)[μ-EtOC(O)CH2S]Fe2(CO)6(1).1也可由2经三氟醋酸酸解及中月物(μ-RS)(μ-HS)Fe2(CO)6(3)在三乙胺存在下与氯代乙酸乙酯缩合制得.然而前法较后法既操作简便又原料便宜易得.构象分析表明,各配合物一般为ae.ee和ea三种或其中构象体以一定比例存在的混和物.     

Hydride ion transfer from ruthenium(II) complexes in water: kinetics and mechanism

Reactions of hydride complexes of ruthenium(II) with hydride acceptors have been examined for Ru(terpy)(bpy)H(+), Ru(terpy)(dmb)H(+), and Ru(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))(bpy)(H)(+) in aqueous media at 25 °C (terpy = 2,2';6',2'-terpyridine, bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, dmb = 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine). The acceptors include CO(2), CO, CH(2)O, and H(3)O(+). CO reacts with Ru(terpy)(dmb)H(+) with a rate constant of 1.2 (0.2) × 10(1) M(-1) s(-1), but for Ru(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))(bpy)(H)(+), the reaction was very slow, k ≤ 0.1 M(-1) s(-1). Ru(terpy)(bpy)H(+) and Ru(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))(bpy)(H)(+) react with CH(2)O with rate constants of (6 ± 4) × 10(6) and 1.1 × 10(3) M(-1) s(-1), respectively. The reaction of Ru(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))(bpy)(H)(+) with acid exhibits straightforward, second-order kinetics, with the rate proportional to [Ru(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))(bpy)(H)(+)] and [H(3)O(+)] and k = 2.2 × 10(1) M(-1) s(-1) (μ = 0.1 M, Na(2)SO(4) medium). However, for the case of Ru(terpy)(bpy)H(+), the protonation step is very rapid, and only the formation of the product Ru(terpy)(bpy)(H(2)O)(2+) (presumably via a dihydrogen or dihydride complex) is observed with a k(obs) of ca. 4 s(-1). The hydricities of HCO(2)(-), HCO(-), and H(3)CO(-) in water are estimated as +1.48, -0.76, and +1.57 eV/molecule (+34, -17.5, +36 kcal/mol), respectively. Theoretical studies of the reactions with CO(2) reveal a "product-like" transition state with short C-H and long M-H distances. (Reactant) Ru-H stretched 0.68 ?; (product) C-H stretched only 0.04 ?. The role of water solvent was explored by including one, two, or three water molecules in the calculation.     

Preparation of hydrido(vinylidene)ruthenium(II) complexes and a one-pot synthesis of Grubbs-type ruthenium carbenes

Treatment of the hydrido(dihydrogen) compound [RuHCl(H2)(PCy3)2] 1 with alkynes RC[triple bond, length as m-dash]CH (R=H, Ph) afforded the hydrido(vinylidene) complexes [RuHCl(=C=CHR)(PCy3)2] 2, 3 which react with HCl or [HPCy3]Cl to give the corresponding Grubbs-type ruthenium carbenes [RuCl2(=CHCH2R)(PCy3)2] 4, 5. The reaction of 2 (R=H) with DCl, or D2O in the presence of chloride sources, led to the formation of [RuCl2(=CHCH2D)(PCy3)2] 4-d1. Based on these observations, a one-pot synthesis of compounds 4 and 5 was developed using RuCl3.3H2O as the starting material. The hydrido(vinylidene) derivative 2 reacted with CF3CO2H and HCN at low temperatures to yield the carbene complexes [RuCl(X)(=CHCH3)(PCy3)2] 6, 7, of which 7 (X=CN) was characterized crystallographically. Salt metathesis of 2 with CF3CO2K and KI led to the formation of [RuH(X)(=C=CH2)(PCy3)2] 8, 9. The bis(trifluoracetato) and the diiodo compounds [RuX2(=CHCH3)(PCy3)2] 10, 11 as well as the new phosphine P(thp)3 12 (thp=4-tetrahydropyranyl) and the corresponding complex [RuCl2(=CHCH3){P(thp)3}2] 14 were also prepared. The catalytic activity of the ruthenium carbenes 4-7, 10, 11 and 14 in the olefin cross-metathesis of cyclopentene and allyl alcohol was investigated.     

The "missing link": the gas-phase generation of platinum-methylidyne clusters Pt(n)CH+ (n=1, 2) and their reactions with hydrocarbons and ammonia

Electrospray ionization (ESI) of tetrameric platinum(II) acetate, [Pt(4)(CH(3)COO)(8)], in methanol generates the formal platinum(III) dimeric cation [Pt(2)(CH(3)COO)(3)(CH(2)COO)(MeOH)(2)](+), which, upon harsher ionization conditions, sequentially loses the two methanol ligands, CO(2), and CH(2)COO to form the platinum(II) dimer [Pt(2)(CH(3)COO)(2)(CH(3))](+). Next, intramolecular sequential double hydrogen-atom transfer from the methyl group concomitant with the elimination of two acetic acid molecules produces Pt(2)CH(+) from which, upon even harsher conditions, PtCH(+) is eventually generated. This degradation sequence is supported by collision-induced dissociation (CID) experiments, extensive isotope-labeling studies, and DFT calculations. Both PtCH(+) and Pt(2)CH(+) react under thermal conditions with the hydrocarbons C(2)H(n) (n=2, 4, 6) and C(3)H(n) (n=6, 8). While, in ion-molecule reactions of PtCH(+) with C(2) hydrocarbons, the relative rates decrease with increasing n, the opposite trend holds true for Pt(2)CH(+). The Pt(2)CH(+) cluster only sluggishly reacts with C(2)H(2), but with C(2)H(4) and C(2)H(6) dihydrogen loss dominates. The reactions with the latter two substrates were preceded by a complete exchange of all of the hydrogen atoms present in the adduct complex. The PtCH(+) ion is much less selective. In the reactions with C(2)H(2) and C(2)H(4), elimination of H(2) occurs; however, CH(4) formation prevails in the decomposition of the adduct complex that is formed with C(2)H(6). In the reaction with C(2)H(2), in addition to H(2) loss, C(3)H(3)(+) is produced, and this process formally corresponds to the transfer of the cationic methylidyne unit CH(+) to C(2)H(2), accompanied by the release of neutral Pt. In the ion-molecule reactions with the C(3) hydrocarbons C(3)H(6) and C(3)H(8), dihydrogen loss occurs with high selectivity for Pt(2)CH(+), but in the reactions of these substrates with PtCH(+) several reaction routes compete. Finally, in the ion-molecule reactions with ammonia, both platinum complexes give rise to proton transfer to produce NH(4)(+); however, only the encounter complex generated with PtCH(+) undergoes efficient dehydrogenation of the substrate, and the rather minor formation of CNH(4)(+) indicates that C-N bond coupling is inefficient.     

Photochemical and thermal hydrogen production from water catalyzed by carboxylate-bridged dirhodium(II) complexes

A series of dinuclear Rh(II) complexes, [Rh(2)(μ-OAc)(4)(H(2)O)(2)] (HOAc = acetic acid) (1), [Rh(2)(μ-gly)(4)(H(2)O)(2)] (Hgly = glycolic acid) (2), [Rh(2)(μ-CF(3)CO(2))(4)(acetone)(2)] (3), and [Rh(2)(bpy)(2)(μ-OAc)(2)(OAc)(2)] (4), were found to serve as H(2)-evolving catalysts in a three-component system consisting of tris(2,2'-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) (Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)), methylviologen (MV(2+)), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA). It was also confirmed that thermal reduction of water into H(2) by MV(+)˙, in situ generated by the bulk electrolysis of MV(2+), is effectively promoted by 1 as a H(2)-evolving catalyst. The absorption spectra of the photolysis solution during the photocatalysis were monitored up to 6 h to reveal that the formation of photochemical or thermal byproducts of MV(+)˙ is dramatically retarded in the presence of the Rh(II)(2) catalysts, for the H(2) formation rather than the decomposition of MV(+)˙ becomes predominant in the presence of the Rh(II)(2) catalysts. The stability of the Rh(II)(2) dimers was confirmed by absorption spectroscopy, (1)H NMR, and ESI-TOF mass spectroscopy. The results indicated that neither elimination nor replacement of the equatorial ligands take place during the photolysis, revealing that one of the axial sites of the Rh(2) core is responsible for the hydrogenic activation. The quenching of Ru*(bpy)(3)(2+) by 1 was also investigated by luminescence spectroscopy. The rate of H(2) evolution was found to decrease upon increasing the concentration of 1, indicating that the quenching of Ru*(bpy)(3)(2+) by the Rh(ii)(2) species rather than by MV(2+) becomes predominant at the higher concentrations of 1. The DFT calculations were carried out for several possible reaction paths proposed (e.g., [Rh(II)(2)(μ-OAc)(4)(H(2)O)] + H(+) and [Rh(II)(2)(μ-OAc)(4)(H(2)O)] + H(+) + e(-)). It is suggested that the initial step is a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) to the Rh(II)(2) dimer leading to the formation of a Rh(II)Rh(III)-H intermediate. The H(2) evolution step is suggested to proceed either via the transfer of another set of H(+) and e(-) to the Rh(II)Rh(III)-H intermediate or via the homolytic radical coupling through the interaction of two Rh(II)Rh(III)-H intermediates.     

Synthesis, characterization, crystal structure and preliminary reactivity behaviour of new heteropolytopic ligands based on the 1,3,5-triazine spacer and pyrazolyl, tris-pyrazolylmethyl and tris-pyrazolylethoxy bonding fragments

Four new potentially polytopic nitrogen donor ligands based on the 1,3,5-triazine fragment, L(1)-L(4) (L(1) = 2-chloro-4,6-di(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazine, L(2) = N,N'-bis(4,6-di(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)ethane-1,2-diamine, L(3) = 2,4,6-tris(tri(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)methyl)-1,3,5-triazine, and L(4) = 2,4,6-tris(2,2,2-tri(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)ethoxy)-1,3,5-triazine) have been synthesized and characterized. The X-ray crystal structure of L(3) confirms that its molecular nature consists of a 1,3,5-triazine ring bearing three tripodal tris(pyrazolyl) arms. L(1), L(2), and L(4) react with Cu(I), Cu(II), Pd(II) and Ag(I) salts yielding mono-, di-, and oligonuclear derivatives: [Cu(L(1))(Cy(3)P)]ClO(4), [{Ag(2)(L(2))}(CF(3)SO(3))(2)]·H(2)O, [Cu(2)(L(2))(NO(3))(2)](NO(3))(2)·H(2)O, [Cu(2)(L(2))(CH(3)COO)(2)](CH(3)COO)(2)·3H(2)O, [Pd(2)(L(2))(Cl)(4)]·2H(2)O, [Ru(L(2))(Cl)(OH)]·CH(3)OH, [Ag(3)(L(4))(2)](CF(3)SO(3))(3) and [Ag(3)(L(4))(2)](BF(4))(3). The interaction of L(3) with Ag(I), Cu(II), Zn(II) and Ru(II) complexes unexpectedly produced the hydrolysis of the ligand with formation, in all cases, of tris(pyrazolyl)methane (TPM) derivatives. In detail, the already known [Ag(TPM)(2)](CF(3)SO(3)) and [Cu(TPM)(2)](NO(3))(2), as well as the new [Zn(TPM)(2)](CF(3)SO(3))(2) and [Ru(TMP)(p-cymene)]Cl(OH)·2H(2)O complexes have been isolated. Single-crystal XRD determinations on the latter derivatives confirm their formulation, evidencing, for the Ru(II) complex, an interesting supramolecular arrangement of the anions and crystallization water molecules.     

Reactions of halofluorocarbons with group 6 complexes M(C(5)H(5))(2)L (M = Mo, W; L = C(2)H(4), CO). Fluoroalkylation at molybdenum and tungsten, and at cyclopentadienyl or ethylene ligands.

The molybdenum(II) and tungsten(II) complexes [MCp(2)L] (Cp = eta(5)-cyclopentadienyl; L = C(2)H(4), CO) react with perfluoroalkyl iodides to give a variety of products. The Mo(II) complex [MoCp(2)(C(2)H(4))] reacts with perfluoro-n-butyl iodide or perfluorobenzyl iodide with loss of ethylene to give the first examples of fluoroalkyl complexes of Mo(IV), MoCp(2)(CF(2)CF(2)CF(2)CF(3))I (8) and MoCp(2)(CF(2)C(6)F(5))I (9), one of which (8) has been crystallographically characterized. In contrast, the CO analogue [MoCp(2)(CO)] reacts with perfluorobenzyl iodide without loss of CO to give the crystallographically characterized salt, [MoCp(2)(CF(2)C(6)F(5))(CO)](+)I(-) (10), and the W(II) ethylene precursor [WCp(2)(C(2)H(4))] reacts with perfluorobenzyl iodide without loss of ethylene to afford the salt [WCp(2)(CF(2)C(6)F(5))(C(2)H(4))](+)I(-) (11). These observations demonstrate that the metal-carbon bond is formed first. In further contrast the tungsten precursor [WCp(2)(C(2)H(4))] reacts with perfluoro-n-butyl iodide, perfluoro-iso-propyl iodide, and pentafluorophenyl iodide to give fluoroalkyl- and fluorophenyl-substituted cyclopentadienyl complexes WCp(eta(5)-C(5)H(4)R(F))(H)I (12, R(F) = CF(2)CF(2)CF(2)CF(3); 15, R(F) = CF(CF(3))(2); 16, R(F) = C(6)F(5)); the Mo analogue MoCp(eta(5)-C(5)H(4)R(F))(H)I (14, R(F) = CF(CF(3))(2)) is obtained in similar fashion. The tungsten(IV) hydrido compounds react with iodoform to afford the corresponding diiodides WCp(eta(5)-C(5)H(4)R(F))I(2) (13, R(F) = CF(2)CF(2)CF(2)CF(3); 18, R(F) = CF(CF(3))(2); 19, R(F) = C(6)F(5)), two of which (13 and 19) have been crystallographically characterized. The carbonyl precursors [MCp(2)(CO)] each react with perfluoro-iso-propyl iodide without loss of CO, to afford the exo-fluoroalkylated cyclopentadiene M(II) complexes MCp(eta(4)-C(5)H(5)R(F))(CO)I (21, M = Mo; 22, M = W); the exo-stereochemistry for the fluoroalkyl group is confirmed by an X-ray structural study of 22. The ethylene analogues [MCp(2)(C(2)H(4))] react with perfluoro-tert-butyl iodide to yield the products MCp(2)[(CH(2)CH(2)C(CF(3))(3)]I (25, M = Mo; 26, M = W) resulting from fluoroalkylation at the ethylene ligand. Attempts to provide positive evidence for fluoroalkyl radicals as intermediates in reactions of primary and benzylic substrates were unsuccessful, but trapping experiments with CH(3)OD (to give R(F)D, not R(F)H) indicate that fluoroalkyl anions are the intermediates responsible for ring and ethylene fluoroalkylation in the reactions of secondary and tertiary fluoroalkyl substrates.     

Crystal Structure of[PrAl(CF3COO)2(CF3CHOO)(C2H5)2(C4H8O)2]2

[PrAl(CF3COO)2(CF3CHOO)(C2H5)2(C4H8O)2]2 Mr=1420.56, monoclinic, P21/n, a=10.651(6), b=24.276(9), c=11.110(5)(), β=107.650(4)°, V=2737.4(1)()3, Z=2, Dc=3.45 g/cm3, F(000)=2816, T=233K, MoKα radiation (λ=0.71069()), μ(MoKα)=38.017 cm-1, R=0.048 for 2847 observed reflections (I≥3σ(I)). It is isostructural with [LnAl(CF3COO)2(CF3CHOO)-R2(C4H8O)2]2 (Ln=Ho, R=Et; Ln=Nd, Y, R=iBu). Pr3+ is coordinated by eight oxygen atoms from five bridging ligands and two THF forming a distorted bicap-prism.     

The reaction of M(CO)3(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)(M = Fe, Ru) with parahydrogen: probing the electronic structure of reaction intermediates and the internal rearrangement mechanism for the dihydride products

The photochemical reaction of Ru(CO)(3)(dppe) and Fe(CO)(3)(dppe)(dppe = Ph(2)PCH(2)CH(2)PPh(2)) with parahydrogen has been studied by in situ-photochemistry resulting in NMR spectra of Ru(CO)(2)(dppe)(H)(2) that show significant enhancement of the hydride resonances while normal signals are seen in Fe(CO)(2)(dppe)(H)(2). This effect is associated with a singlet electronic state for the key intermediate Ru(CO)(2)(dppe) while Fe(CO)(2)(dppe) is a triplet. DFT calculations reveal electronic ground states consistent with this picture. The fluxionality of Ru(CO)(2)(dppe)(H)(2) and Fe(CO)(2)(dppe)(H)(2) has been examined by NMR spectroscopy and rationalised by theoretical methods which show that two pathways for ligand exchange exist. In the first, the phosphorus and carbonyl centres interchange positions while the two hydride ligands are unaffected. A second pathway involving interchange of all three ligand sets was found at slightly higher energy. The H-H distances in the transition states are consistent with metal-bonded dihydrogen ligands. However, no local minimum (intermediate) was found along the rearrangement pathways.     

Oxidative addition of phosphine-tethered thiols to iron carbonyl: binuclear phosphinothiolate complexes, (mu-SCH(2)CH(2)PPh(2))(2)Fe(2)(CO)(4), and hydride derivatives

The mononuclear complex Fe(CO)(4)(PPh(2)CH(2)CH(2)SH), 1, is isolated as an intermediate in the overall reaction of PPh(2)CH(2)CH(2)SH with [Fe(0)(CO)(4)] sources to produce binuclear bridging thiolate complexes. Photolysis is required for loss of CO and subsequent S-H activation to generate the metal-metal bonded Fe(I)-Fe(I) complex, (mu-SCH(2)CH(2)PPh(2))(2)Fe(2)(CO)(4), 2. Isomeric forms of 2 derive from the apical or basal position of the P-donor ligand in the pseudo square pyramidal S(2)Fe(CO)(2)P coordination spheres. This position in turn is dictated by the stereochemistry of the mu-S-CH(2) bond, designated as syn or anti with respect to the Fe(2)S(2) butterfly core. Addition of strong acids engages the Fe(I)-Fe(I) bond density as a bridging hydride, [(mu-H)-anti-2](+)[SO(3)CF(3)](-) or [(mu-H)-syn-2](+)[SO(3)CF(3)](-), with formal oxidation to Fe(II)-H-Fe(II). Molecular structures of anti-2, syn-2, and [(mu-H)-anti-2](+)[SO(3)CF(3)](-) were determined by X-ray crystallography and show insignificant differences in distance and angle metric parameters, including the Fe-Fe bond distances which average 2.6 A. The lack of coordination sphere rearrangements is consistent with the ease with which deprotonation occurs, even with the weak base, chloride. The Fe(I)-Fe(I) bond, supported by bridging thiolates, therefore presents a site where a proton might be taken up and stored as a hydride without impacting the overall structure of the binuclear complex.     

Novel acetate polyoxomolybdate "host" accommodating a zigzag-chainlike "guest" of five edge-shared sodium cations: Na(21)[[Na(5)(H(2)O)(14)]within[Mo(46)O(134)(OH)(10)(mu-CH(3)COO)(4)]].CH(3)COONa. approximately equal to 95H(2)O

A novel ESR-silent polyoxomolybdate Na(21)([Na(5)(H(2)O)(14)][Mo(46)O(134)(OH)(10)(mu-CH(3)COO)(4)]).CH(3)COONa.approximately equal to 90H(2)O (3) was simply synthesized in high yield by reducing an acidified aqueous solution of Na(2)MoO(4).2H(2)O and CH(3)COONa.3H(2)O. The structure of 3 is constructed by a 46-member crown-shaped anion, [Na(5)(H(2)O)(14)]within[Mo(V)(20)Mo(VI)(26)O(134)(OH)(10)(mu-CH(3)COO)(4)](21-), 3a, which is built up by three different but related building blocks in a new mode and further connected into layers via Na(+) and hydrogen bonds. Crystal data of compound 3: triclinic space group P(-1); a = 16.4065(3), b = 17.4236(2), c = 20.8247(3) A; alpha= 87.57, beta= 67.9810(10), gamma= 80.6970(10)o; V = 5445.08(14) A(3); Z = 1; D(calcd) = 2.902. Structure solution and refinement are based on 19014 reflections, R = 0.0750.     

Trans --> cis isomerization of trans-[(dppm)2Ru(H)(L)][BF4] (L = P(OR)3) complexes: preparation of cis-[(dppm)2Ru(eta2-H2)(L)][BF4]2

A series of new dicationic dihydrogen complexes of ruthenium of the type cis-[(dppm)(2)Ru(eta(2)-H(2))(L)][BF(4)](2) (dppm = Ph(2)PCH(2)PPh(2); L = P(OMe)(3), P(OEt)(3), PF(O(i)Pr)(2)) have been prepared by protonating the precursor hydride complexes cis-[(dppm)(2)Ru(H)(L)][BF(4)] (L = P(OMe)(3), P(OEt)(3), P(O(i)Pr)(3)) using HBF(4).Et(2)O. The cis-[(dppm)(2)Ru(H)(L)][BF(4)] complexes were obtained from the trans hydrides via an isomerization reaction that is acid-accelerated. This isomerization reaction gives mixtures of cis and trans hydride complexes, the ratios of which depend on the cone angles of the phosphite ligands: the greater the cone angle, the greater is the amount of the cis isomer. The eta(2)-H(2) ligand in the dihydrogen complexes is labile, and the loss of H(2) was found to be reversible. The protonation reactions of the starting hydrides with trans PMe(3) or PMe(2)Ph yield mixtures of the cis and the trans hydride complexes; further addition of the acid, however, give trans-[(dppm)(2)Ru(BF(4))Cl]. The roles of the bite angles of the dppm ligand as well as the steric and the electronic properties of the monodentate phosphorus ligands in this series of complexes are discussed. X-ray crystal structures of trans-[(dppm)(2)Ru(H)(P(OMe)(3))][BF(4)], cis-[(dppm)(2)Ru(H)(P(OMe)(3))][BF(4)], and cis-[(dppm)(2)Ru(H)(P(O(i)Pr)(3))][BF(4)] complexes have been determined.     

Metallonitrosyl fragment as electron acceptor: intramolecular charge transfer, long range electronic coupling, and electrophilic reactivity in the trans-[NCRu(py)(4)(CN)Ru(py)(4)NO](3+) ion

The new complex trans-[NCRu(py)(4)(CN)Ru(py)(4)NO](PF(6))(3) (I) was synthesized. In acetonitrile solution, I shows an intense visible band (555 nm, epsilon = 5800 M(-1) cm(-1)) and other absorptions below 350 nm, associated with d(pi) --> pi(py) and pi(py) --> pi(py) transitions. The visible band is presently assigned as a donor-acceptor charge transfer (DACT) transition from the remote Ru(II) to the delocalized [Ru(II)-NO(+)] moiety. Photoinduced release of NO is observed upon irradiation at the DACT band. Application of the Hush model reveals strong electronic coupling, with H(DA) = approximately 2000 cm(-1). The difference between the optical absorption energy and redox potentials for the donor and acceptor sites (Ru(III,II), 1.40 V, and NO(+)/NO, 0.50 V, vs Ag/AgCl, 3 M KCl, respectively) (hnu - DeltaE(red)) is 1.33 eV, a large value which probably relates to the significant changes in distances and angles for the Ru-N-O moiety upon reduction. UV-vis absorptions, IR frequencies, and redox potentials are solvent-dependent. Controlled potential reduction (of NO(+)) and oxidation (of Ru(II) associated with the dicyano-chromophore) of I afford stable species, [NCRu(II)(py)(4)(CN)Ru(py)(4)NO](2+) (I(red)) and [NCRu(III)(py)(4)(CN)Ru(py)(4)NO](4+) (I(ox)), respectively, which are characterized by UV-vis and IR spectroscopies. I(red) shows an EPR spectrum characteristic of [Ru(II)-NO(*)] complexes. Compound I is electrophilically reactive in aqueous solution above pH 5: values of the equilibrium constant for the reaction [NCRu(py)(4)(CN)Ru(py)(4)NO](3+)+ 2 OH(-) <--> [NCRu(py)(4)(CN)Ru(py)(4)NO(2)](+) + H(2)O, K = 3.2 +/- 1.4 x 10(15) M(-2), and of the rate constant for the nucleophilic addition of OH(-), k = 9.2 +/- 0.2 x 10(3) M(-1) s(-1)(25 degrees C, I = 1 M), are obtained, with DeltaH = 90.7 +/- 3.8 kJ mol(-1) and DeltaS = 135 +/- 13 J K(-1) mol(-1). The oxidized complex, I(ox), shows an enhanced electrophilic reactivity toward OH(-). This addition reaction is followed by irreversible processes, which most probably lead to disproportionation of bound nitrite and other products.     

Facile oxidative addition of water at iridium: reactivity of trans-[Ir(4-C5NF4)(H)(OH)(PiPr3)2] towards CO2 and NH3

A reaction of trans-[Ir(4-C(5)NF(4))(η(2)-C(2)H(4))(PiPr(3))(2)] (1) with an excess of water in THF at room temperature affords the hydrido hydroxo complex trans-[Ir(4-C(5)NF(4))(H)(OH)(PiPr(3))(2)] (2). Treatment of 2 with CO furnishes trans-[Ir(4-C(5)NF(4))(H)(OH)(CO)(PiPr(3))(2)] (3). Reductive elimination of water from 3 leads to the formation of the iridium(I) carbonyl complex trans-[Ir(4-C(5)NF(4))(CO)(PiPr(3))(2)] (4). The insertion of CO(2) into the Ir-O bond of 2 forms the hydrido hydrogencarbonato complex trans-[Ir(4-C(5)NF(4))(H)(κ(2)-(O,O)-O(2)COH)(PiPr(3))(2)] (5). Treatment of 2 with NH(3) in C(6)D(6) yields trans-[Ir(4-C(5)NF(4))(H)(OH)(NH(3))(PiPr(3))(2)] (6). Storage of the reaction mixture at room temperature reveals the formation of the N-H activation product [Ir(4-C(5)NF(4))(H)(μ-NH(2))(NH(3))(PiPr(3))](2) (7).