A completion theorem for pro-G-spectra

We give a very general completion theorem for pro-spectra. We show that, if G is a compact Lie group, M[∗] is a pro-G-spectrum, and F is a family of (closed) subgroups of G, then the mapping pro-spectrum F(EF₊,M[∗]) is the F-adic completion of M[∗], in the sense that the map M[∗]→F(EF₊,M[∗]) is the universal map into an algebraically F-adically complete pro-spectrum. Here, F(EF₊,M[∗]) denotes the pro-G-spectrum , where runs over the finite subcomplexes of EF₊.     

Limits in compact Abelian groups

For X a compact Abelian group and B an infinite subset of its dual , let CB be the set of all x∈X such that converges to 1. If F is a free filter on , let . The sets CB and DF are subgroups of X. CB always has Haar measure 0, while the measure of DF depends on F. We show that there is a filter F such that DF has measure 0 but is not contained in any CB. This generalizes previous results for the special case where X is the circle group.     

Pseudocompact group topologies with no infinite compact subsets

We show that every Abelian group satisfying a mild cardinal inequality admits a pseudocompact group topology from which all countable subgroups inherit the maximal totally bounded topology (we say that such a topology satisfies property ).Every pseudocompact Abelian group G with cardinality |G|≤2^2c satisfies this inequality and therefore admits a pseudocompact group topology with property . Under the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis (SCH) this criterion can be combined with an analysis of the algebraic structure of pseudocompact groups to prove that every pseudocompact Abelian group admits a pseudocompact group topology with property .We also observe that pseudocompact Abelian groups with property contain no infinite compact subsets and are examples of Pontryagin reflexive precompact groups that are not compact.     

Convergence preserving mappings on topological groups

It is well known that a mapping is convergence preserving, that is, whenever an infinite series ∑an converges, the series ∑φ(an) converges, if and only if there exists m∈R such that φ(x)=mx in some neighborhood of 0. We explore convergence preserving mappings on Hausdorff topological groups, showing in particular, that if G×G is a Fréchet group, and H has no small subgroups, then a mapping is convergence preserving if and only if there is a neighborhood of the identity in G on which φ is a sequentially continuous homomorphism.     

Note on separate continuity and the Namioka property

A pair 〈B,K〉 is a Namioka pair if K is compact and for any separately continuous , there is a dense A⊆B such that f is ( jointly) continuous on A×K. We give an example of a Choquet space B and separately continuous such that the restriction fΔ_| to the diagonal does not have a dense set of continuity points. However, for K a compact fragmentable space we have: For any separately continuous and for any Baire subspace F of T×K, the set of points of continuity of is dense in F. We say that 〈B,K〉 is a weak-Namioka pair if K is compact and for any separately continuous and a closed subset F projecting irreducibly onto B, the set of points of continuity of fF_| is dense in F. We show that T is a Baire space if the pair 〈T,K〉 is a weak-Namioka pair for every compact K. Under (CH) there is an example of a space B such that 〈B,K〉 is a Namioka pair for every compact K but there is a countably compact C and a separately continuous which has no dense set of continuity points; in fact, f does not even have the Baire property.     

Minimal pseudocompact group topologies on free abelian groups

A Hausdorff topological group G is minimal if every continuous isomorphism f:G→H between G and a Hausdorff topological group H is open. Significantly strengthening a 1981 result of Stoyanov, we prove the following theorem: For every infinite minimal abelian group G there exists a sequence of cardinals such that

     

Locally compact abelian groups admitting non-trivial quasi-convex null sequences

In this paper, we show that, for every locally compact abelian group G, the following statements are equivalent:

(i)

G contains no sequence such that {0}∪{±x_n∣n∈N} is infinite and quasi-convex in G, and x_n?0;

(ii)

one of the subgroups {g∈G∣2g=0} or {g∈G∣3g=0} is open in G;

(iii)

G contains an open compact subgroup of the form or for some cardinal κ.

     

Spaces determined by selections

A function is a called a weak selection if ψ({x,y})∈{x,y} for every x,y∈X. To each weak selection ψ, one associates a topology τψ, generated by the sets and . Answering a question of S. García-Ferreira and A.H. Tomita [S. García-Ferreira, A.H. Tomita, A non-normal topology generated by a two-point selection, Topology Appl. 155 (10) (2008) 1105-1110], we show that (X,τψ) is completely regular for every weak selection ψ. We further investigate to what extent the existence of a continuous weak selection on a topological space determines the topology of X. In particular, we answer two questions of V. Gutev and T. Nogura [V. Gutev, T. Nogura, Selection problems for hyperspaces, in: E. Pearl (Ed.), Open Problems in Topology 2, Elsevier B.V., 2007, pp. 161-170].     

Continuous mappings on subspaces of products with the κ-box topology

Much of General Topology addresses this issue: Given a function f∈C(Y,Z) with Y⊆Y^′ and Z⊆Z^′, find , or at least , such that ; sometimes Z=Z^′ is demanded. In this spirit the authors prove several quite general theorems in the context Y^′=κ(XI)=_∏i∈IXi in the κ-box topology (that is, with basic open sets of the form _∏i∈IUi with Ui open in Xi and with Ui≠Xi for <κ-many i∈I). A representative sample result, extending to the κ-box topology some results of Comfort and Negrepontis, of Noble and Ulmer, and of Hušek, is this.

Theorem. Letω?κ?α (that means: κ<α, and[β<αandλ<κ]⇒βλ<α) with α regular,be a set of non-empty spaces with eachd(Xi)<α,π[Y]=XJfor each non-emptyJ⊆Isuch that|J|<α, and the diagonal in Z be the intersection of <α-many regular-closed subsets ofZ×Z. Then (a) Y is pseudo-(α,α)-compact, (b) for everyf∈C(Y,Z)there isJ∈[I]^<αsuch thatf(x)=f(y)wheneverxJ=yJ, and (c) every such f extends to.     

Solutions of polynomial Pell's equation

Let D=F²+2G be a monic quartic polynomial in Z[x], where . Then for F/G∈Q[x], a necessary and sufficient condition for the solution of the polynomial Pell's equation X²−DY²=1 in Z[x] has been shown. Also, the polynomial Pell's equation X²−DY²=1 has nontrivial solutions X,Y∈Q[x] if and only if the values of period of the continued fraction of are 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 18, and 22 has been shown. In this paper, for the period of the continued fraction of is 4, we show that the polynomial Pell's equation has no nontrivial solutions X,Y∈Z[x].     

Modular metric spaces, I: Basic concepts

The notion of a modular is introduced as follows. A (metric) modular on a set X is a function w:(0,∞)×X×X→[0,∞] satisfying, for all x,y,z∈X, the following three properties: x=y if and only if w(λ,x,y)=0 for all λ>0; w(λ,x,y)=w(λ,y,x) for all λ>0; w(λ+μ,x,y)≤w(λ,x,z)+w(μ,y,z) for all λ,μ>0. We show that, given x₀∈X, the set X_w={x∈X:lim_λ→∞w(λ,x,x₀)=0} is a metric space with metric , called a modular space. The modular w is said to be convex if (λ,x,y)?λw(λ,x,y) is also a modular on X. In this case X_w coincides with the set of all x∈X such that w(λ,x,x₀)<∞ for some λ=λ(x)>0 and is metrizable by . Moreover, if or , then ; otherwise, the reverse inequalities hold. We develop the theory of metric spaces, generated by modulars, and extend the results by H. Nakano, J. Musielak, W. Orlicz, Ph. Turpin and others for modulars on linear spaces.     

Characterizing continuous functions on compact spaces

We consider the following problem: given a set X and a function , does there exist a compact Hausdorff topology on X which makes T continuous? We characterize such functions in terms of their orbit structure. Given the generality of the problem, the characterization turns out to be surprisingly simple and elegant. Amongst other results, we also characterize homeomorphisms on compact metric spaces.     

Excessive factorizations of bipartite multigraphs

An excessive factorization of a multigraph G is a set F={F₁,F₂,…,F_r} of 1-factors of G whose union is E(G) and, subject to this condition, r is minimum. The integer r is called the excessive index of G and denoted by . We set if an excessive factorization does not exist. Analogously, let m be a fixed positive integer. An excessive[m]-factorization is a set M={M₁,M₂,…,M_k} of matchings of G, all of size m, whose union is E(G) and, subject to this condition, k is minimum. The integer k is denoted by and called the excessive [m]-index of G. Again, we set if an excessive [m]-factorization does not exist. In this paper we shall prove that, for bipartite multigraphs, both the parameters and are computable in polynomial time, and we shall obtain an efficient algorithm for finding an excessive factorization and excessive [m]-factorization, respectively, of any bipartite multigraph.     

Rudin's Dowker space, strong base-normality and base-strong-zero-dimensionality

It is well known that every pair of disjoint closed subsets F₀,F₁ of a normal T₁-space X admits a star-finite open cover U of X such that, for every U∈U, either or holds. We define a T₁-space X to be strongly base-normal if there is a base B for X with |B|=w(X) satisfying that every pair of disjoint closed subsets F₀,F₁ of X admits a star-finite cover B^′ of X by members of B such that, for every B∈B^′, either or holds. We prove that there is a base-normal space which is not strongly base-normal. Moreover, we show that Rudin's Dowker space is strongly base-(collectionwise)normal. Strong zero-dimensionality on base-normal spaces are also studied.     

A proof of a conjecture of Sabidussi on graphs idempotent under the lexicographic product

In 1960, Sabidussi conjectured that if a graph G is isomorphic to the lexicographic product G[G], then the wreath product of by itself is a proper subgroup of . A positive answer is provided by constructing an automorphism Ψ of G[G] which satisfies: for every vertex x of G, there is an infinite subset I(x) of V(G) such that Ψ({x}×V(G))=I(x)×V(G).     

Bernoulli matrix and its algebraic properties

In this paper, we define the generalized Bernoulli polynomial matrix B^(α)(x) and the Bernoulli matrix B. Using some properties of Bernoulli polynomials and numbers, a product formula of B^(α)(x) and the inverse of B were given. It is shown that not only B(x)=P[x]B, where P[x] is the generalized Pascal matrix, but also B(x)=FM(x)=N(x)F, where F is the Fibonacci matrix, M(x) and N(x) are the (n+1)×(n+1) lower triangular matrices whose (i,j)-entries are and , respectively. From these formulas, several interesting identities involving the Fibonacci numbers and the Bernoulli polynomials and numbers are obtained. The relationships are established about Bernoulli, Fibonacci and Vandermonde matrices.