The Chemical Bond in C2

Quantum chemical calculations using the complete active space of the valence orbitals have been carried out for H_nCCH_n (n=0–3) and N₂. The quadratic force constants and the stretching potentials of H_nCCH_n have been calculated at the CASSCF/cc‐pVTZ level. The bond dissociation energies of the C?C bonds of C₂ and HC≡CH were computed using explicitly correlated CASPT2‐F12/cc‐pVTZ‐F12 wave functions. The bond dissociation energies and the force constants suggest that C₂ has a weaker C?C bond than acetylene. The analysis of the CASSCF wavefunctions in conjunction with the effective bond orders of the multiple bonds shows that there are four bonding components in C₂, while there are only three in acetylene and in N₂. The bonding components in C₂ consist of two weakly bonding σ bonds and two electron‐sharing π bonds. The bonding situation in C₂ can be described with the σ bonds in Be₂ that are enforced by two π bonds. There is no single Lewis structure that adequately depicts the bonding situation in C₂. The assignment of quadruple bonding in C₂ is misleading, because the bond is weaker than the triple bond in HC≡CH.     

Darstellung und Charakterisierung der Fulleren-Kokristallisate C60 · 12 C6H12, C70 · 12 C6H12, C60 · 12 CCl4, C60 · 2 CHBr3, C60 · 2 CHCl3, C60 · 2 H2CCl2

Synthesis and Characterization of the Fullerene Co-Crystals C₆₀ · 12 C₆H₁₂, C₇₀ · 12 C₆H₁₂, C₆₀ · 12 CCl₄, C₆₀ · 2CHBr₃, C₆₀ · 2CHCl₃, C₆₀ · 2H₂CCl₂ By crystallization of fullerenes from non-polar solvents (C₆H₁₂, CCl₄, CHBr₃, CHCl₃, H₂CCl₂) compounds of the following compositions were obtained: C₆₀ · 12C₆H₁₂, C₇₀ · 12C₆H₁₂, C₆₀ · 12CCl₄, C₆₀ · 2CHCl₃, C₆₀ · 2CHBr₃ and C₆₀ · 2H₂CCl₂. Lattice parameters have been determined by X-ray diffraction of powder samples; according to single-crystal examinations on C₆₀ · 12C₆H₁₂, C₆₀ · 12CCl₄ and C₆₀ · 2CHBr₃ the fullerene is orientationally disordered. C₆₀ · 12C₆H₁₂, cubic, a = 28.167(1) Å; C₇₀ · 12C₆H₁₂, cubic, a = 28.608(2) Å; C₆₀ · 12CCl₄, cubic, a = 27.42(1) Å; C₆₀ · 2CHBr₃, hexagonal, a = 10.212(1), c = 10.209(1) Å; C₆₀ · 2CHCl₃, hexagonal, a = 10.08(1), c = 10.11(2) Å; C₆₀ · 2H₂CCl₂, tetragonal, a = 16.400(1) Å, c = 11.645(7) Å.     

Adsorption behavior of Co and C2H2 on the graphite basal surface: A quantum chemistry study

The adsorption of CO and C₂H₂ molecules on the perfect basal surface of graphite is investigated by adopting cluster models in conjunction with quantum chemical calculations. The noncovalent interaction potential energy curves for three different orientations of CO and C₂H₂ molecules with respect to the inert basal plane of graphite are calculated via semi-empirical and Möller-Plesset ab initio methods. Then, we have considered the effects of interaction energies on the C≡O and C≡C bond lengths by performing the partial geometry optimization procedure on the CO-graphite and C₂H₂-graphite systems in various intermolecular distances. The computational analysis of all physical noncovalent potential energy curves reveals that the relative configurations in which CO and C₂H₂ molecules approach the graphite sheet from out of the plane have stronger interaction energy and so is more favorable from the energetic viewpoint. This means that the graphite layer prefers to increase its thickness via the chemical vapor deposition of CO and C₂H₂ on the graphite.     

Transition‐Metal Complexes Based on the 1,3,5‐Triethynyl Benzene Linking Unit

The synthesis of a unique series of heteromultinuclear transition metal compounds is reported. Complexes 1‐I‐3‐Br‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 4 ), 1‐Br‐3‐(bpy‐C≡C)‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 6 ), 1,3‐(bpy‐C≡C)₂‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 7 ), 1‐(XC≡C)‐3‐(bpy‐C≡C)‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 8 , X = SiMe₃; 9 , X = H), 1‐(HC≡C)‐3‐[(CO)₃ClRe(bpy‐C≡C)]‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 11 ), 1‐[(Ph₃P)AuC≡C]‐3‐[(CO)₃ClRe(bpy‐C≡C)]‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 13 ), 1‐[(Ph₃P)AuC≡C]‐3‐(bpy‐C≡C)‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 14 ), [1‐[(Ph₃PAuC≡C]‐3‐[{[Ti](C≡CSiMe₃)₂}Cu(bpy‐C≡C)]‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃]PF₆ ( 16 ), and [1,3‐[(tBu₂bpy)₂Ru(bpy‐C≡C)]₂‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃](PF₆)₄ ( 18 ) (Fc = (η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe, bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridiyl‐5‐yl, [Ti] = (η⁵‐C₅H₄SiMe₃)₂Ti) were prepared by using consecutive synthesis methodologies including metathesis, desilylation, dehydrohalogenation, and carbon–carbon cross‐coupling reactions. In these complexes the corresponding metal atoms are connected by carbon‐rich bridging units comprising 1,3‐diethynyl‐, 1,3,5‐triethynylbenzene and bipyridyl units. They were characterized by elemental analysis, IR and NMR spectroscopy, and partly by ESI‐TOF mass spectrometry., The structures of 4 and 11 in the solid state are reported. Both molecules are characterized by the central benzene core bridging the individual transition metal complex fragments. The corresponding acetylide entities are, as typical, found in a linear arrangement with representative M–C, C–C_C≡C and C≡C bond lengths.     

Structural Studies of Some Compounds Containing C2 Fragments Attached to Various Metal‐Ligand End‐Groups

The preparation, characterisation and single‐crystal XRD molecular structure determinations of four complexes containing –CC–ML_n end‐groups, namely Ru{C≡CFc′(I)}(dppe)Cp ( 1 ), the vinylidene [Os(=C=CH₂)(PPh₃)₂Cp]PF₆ ( 2 ), trans‐Pt(C≡CC₆H₄‐4‐C≡CPh){C≡CC₆H₄‐4‐C₂Ph[Co₂(μ‐dppm)(CO)₄]}(PPh₃)₂ ( 3 ), and C₆H₄{μ₃‐C₂[AuRu₃(CO)₉(PPh₃)]}₂‐1,4 ( 4 ) are reported. In these compounds a range of –CC– environments is found, extending from the σ‐bonded alkynyl group in 1 to examples where the C₂ unit interacts with either a proton (in vinylidene 2 ), by bridging a dicobalt carbonyl moiety (in 3 ) or the AuRu₃ cluster in 4 . Changes in geometry are rationalised by considering the various bonding modes.     

Synthesis and structural characterization of ferrocenyl indenyl derivatives

In this study, four ferrocenyl indenyl derivatives, C₉H₇–C≡C–Fc (1), C₉H₇–C≡C–Ph–Fc (2), C₉H₇–C≡C–Ph–C≡C–Fc (3), and C₉H₇–Ph–C≡C–Fc (4) (where C₉H₇=indenyl; Fc=C₅H₅FeC₅H₄; Ph=C₆H₅), have been synthesized by Sonogashira and Suzuki cross-coupling reactions and characterized by elemental analysis, and FT-IR, ¹H, ¹³C-NMR, and MS spectroscopic methods, respectively. The molecular structures of 1, 2, and 4 were determined by X-ray single crystal diffraction. Two molecules appeared in the crystal structure of 4, and they interact through an intermolecular hydrogen bond. The electrochemical redox potential differences in 1–4 were investigated using cyclic voltammetry and calculations.     

Macrocyclic‐ligand Induced Synthesis of Aryl Ethynides with Divergent Silver(I) Clusters

Two structurally characterized metal‐cluster‐centered supramolecular architectures named [Ag₈(1,2‐(C ≡ C)₂‐C₆H₄ )( Py[6] )(CF₃CO₂ )₆] · 2.5MeOH ( 1 ) and [Ag₁₂(1,2,4,5‐(C ≡ C)₄C₆H₂ )( Py[6] )₂(CF₃SO₃ )₈]·4MeOH ·3H₂O ( 2 ) are synthesized through the interaction with a bowl‐shaped macrocyclic ligand Py[6] . Particularly, two dissimilar silver(I) clusters are resulted in 2 within the structure under the influence of the macrocyclic ligand Py[6] . Such dissimilarity of the silver(I) cluster is also reflected on the structural and photophysical differences between 1 and 2 .     

The Solitary Isomer of C60H18 Is Proven to Have a C3v Crown Shape: Crystal Structure Determination and Synthesis of Its Triruthenium Cluster Complex

Analytically pure C₆₀H₁₈ is obtained by a Ru₃ cluster complexation and decomplexation method. The crystal structure of C₆₀H₁₈ consists of one flattened hemisphere, to which all 18 hydrogen atoms are symmetrically bonded, and one curved hemisphere akin to C₆₀. A benzenoid ring in the flattened hemisphere is isolated from the residual π systems by a belt composed of sp³‐hybridized CH units. The average out‐of‐plane distances for carbon atoms attached to the benzenoid ring (0.14 Å) is substantially larger than that found in C₆₀F₁₈ (0.06 Å). Several long C(sp³)?C(sp³) single bond lengths [1.61(3)–1.65(3) Å] are observed for C₆₀H₁₈. The reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] and C₆₀H₁₈ produces [Ru₃(CO)₉(μ₃‐η²,η²,η²‐C₆₀H₁₈)] ( 1 ), where the Ru₃ triangle is regiospecifically linked to the hexagon opposite to the benzenoid ring. Compound 1 is the first transition metal complex of a polyhydrofullerene (fullerane). C₆₀H₁₈ and 1 have been characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR, UV/Vis, and mass spectroscopies. The HOMO–LUMO gap of C₆₀H₁₈ is evaluated to be 1.51 V by cyclic voltammetry.     

Rational Design of Microporous MOFs with Anionic Boron Cluster Functionality and Cooperative Dihydrogen Binding Sites for Highly Selective Capture of Acetylene

Separation of acetylene (C₂H₂) from carbon dioxide (CO₂) or ethylene (C₂H₄) is important in industry but limited by the low capacity and selectivity owing to their similar molecular sizes and physical properties. Herein, we report two novel dodecaborate‐hybrid metal–organic frameworks, MB₁₂H₁₂(dpb)₂ (termed as BSF‐3 and BSF‐3‐Co for M=Cu and Co), for highly selective capture of C₂H₂. The high C₂H₂ capacity and remarkable C₂H₂/CO₂ selectivity resulted from the unique anionic boron cluster functionality as well as the suitable pore size with cooperative proton‐hydride dihydrogen bonding sites (B?H^δ????H^δ+?C≡C?H^δ+???H^δ??B). This new type of C₂H₂‐specific functional sites represents a fresh paradigm distinct from those in previous leading materials based on open metal sites, strong electrostatics, or hydrogen bonding.     

Hyperpolarizability of the C60 fullerene cluster

Motivated by a discrepancy of five orders of magnitude between three different hyperpolarizability measurements on the C₆₀ fullerene, we calculated the optical response of this cluster using a tight-binding Hamiltonian and compared the results to those for a benzene molecule. Our Hamiltonian reproduces the linear polarizability and hyperpolarizability of benzene reasonably well. For C₆₀, our calculations of the bare polarizability agree only with two of the optical response measurements and indicate that the corresponding linear and nonlinear response of C₆₀ is much larger than that of C₆H₆. We find that screening effects decrease this difference strongly, and also reduce the calculated hyperpolarizability of C₆₀ to a value which is two orders of magnitude below the favored measurements.     

Computer modeling of C2 cluster addition to fullerene C60

The reaction between C₂ cluster and C₆₀ fullerene resulting in C₂ insertion to C₆₀ with formation of closed C₆₂ cage (reaction of C₂ ingestion by C₆₀) was investigated by the semiempirical MNDO‐PM3 method. The geometries and energies of extremal points on the C₆₂ potential energy surface were calculated. Several reaction pathways leading to the formation of three different closed C₆₂ fullerenes were investigated. All insertion reactions proceed stepwise through intermediate adducts of different structures. The main reaction pathways were found to be addition of C₂ by its one side to the 6,6‐ or 5,6‐bond of C₆₀ with formation of primary unclosed C₆₂ adducts of “ball‐with‐fork” structures, lying in deep potential wells. Back reaction of C₂ detachment from primary adducts can compete with that of their transformation to the closed C₆₂ cages inasmuch as calculated activation barriers of the both reactions are comparable. Model calculations at the B3LYP/6‐31G* level, using C₃₂H₁₂ semisphere instead of C₆₀, confirmed the conclusion about two competitive pathways of the primary adducts transformation, C₂ detachment, and C₂ ingestion. The concerted insertion of C₂ to C₆₀ was realized only in the case of severe restrictions on starting geometry of the C₂ + C₆₀ system. The results of calculations explain recent experimental data on the formation of metastable adducts upon addition of C₂ to C₆₀, obtained using the time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer with laser desorption. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2002     

From Cluster to Polymer: Ligand Cone Angle Controlled Syntheses and Structures of Copper(I) Alkynyl Complexes

Copper(I) alkynyl complexes have attracted tremendous attention in structural studies, as luminescent materials, and in catalysis, and homoleptic complexes have been reported to form polymers or large clusters. Herein, six unprecedented structures of Cu^I alkynyl complexes and a procedure to measure the cone angles of alkynyl ligands based on the crystal structures of these complexes are reported. An increase of the alkynyl cone angle in the complexes leads to a modulation of the structures from polymeric [((PhC≡CC≡C)Cu)₂(NH₃)]_∞, to a large cluster [(TripC≡CC≡C)Cu]₂₀(MeCN)₄, to a relatively small cluster [(TripC≡C)Cu]₈ (Trip=2,4,6‐iPr₃‐C₆H₂). The complexes exhibit yellow‐to‐red phosphorescence at ambient temperature in the solid state and the luminescence behavior of the Cu₂₀ cluster is sensitive to acetonitrile.     

Terminal Alkyne Coupling Reactions Through a Ring: Effect of Ring Size on Rate and Regioselectivity

Terminal alkyne coupling reactions promoted by rhodium(I) complexes of macrocyclic NHC-based pincer ligands—which feature dodecamethylene, tetradecamethylene or hexadecamethylene wingtip linkers viz. [Rh(CNC-n)(C₂H₄)][BAr^F₄] (n=12, 14, 16; Ar^F=3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃)—have been investigated, using the bulky alkynes HC≡CtBu and HC≡CAr’ (Ar’=3,5-tBu₂C₆H₃) as substrates. These stoichiometric reactions proceed with formation of rhodium(III) alkynyl alkenyl derivatives and produce rhodium(I) complexes of conjugated 1,3-enynes by C−C bond reductive elimination through the annulus of the ancillary ligand. The intermediates are formed with orthogonal regioselectivity, with E-alkenyl complexes derived from HC≡CtBu and gem-alkenyl complexes derived from HC≡CAr’, and the reductive elimination step is appreciably affected by the ring size of the macrocycle. For the homocoupling of HC≡CtBu, E-tBuC≡CCH=CHtBu is produced via direct reductive elimination from the corresponding rhodium(III) alkynyl E-alkenyl derivatives with increasing efficacy as the ring is expanded. In contrast, direct reductive elimination of Ar'C≡CC(=CH₂)Ar’ is encumbered relative to head-to-head coupling of HC≡CAr’ and it is only with the largest macrocyclic ligand studied that the two processes are competitive. These results showcase how macrocyclic ligands can be used to interrogate the mechanism and tune the outcome of terminal alkyne coupling reactions, and are discussed with reference to catalytic reactions mediated by the acyclic homologue [Rh(CNC-Me)(C₂H₄)][BAr^F₄] and solvent effects.     

Acetylenic Cyclophanes as Fullerene Precursors: Formation of C60H6 and C60 by Laser Desorption Mass Spectrometry of C60H6(CO)12

A logical precursor of macrocycle C ₆₀ H ₆ , cyclophane C₆₀H₆(CO)₁₂ ( 1 ) represents a building block in a possible total synthesis of C₆₀. In Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance laser desorption mass spectroscopic experiments in the negative-ion mode, 1 fragments to C₆₀H₆ ( 2 ) under successive loss of CO. Further loss of six H atoms and rearrangement gives C₆₀ ions with a fullerenic structure.     

Preparation and study of hydrides of fullerenes C60 and C70

Fullerene hydrides were prepared by hydrogenation of fullerences C₆₀ and C₇₀ using proton transfer from 9,10-dihydroanthracene to fullerene and were studied by mass spectrometry (electron impact, field desorption), IR, UV, and¹H and¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The main product of the hydrogenation of C₆₀ is C₆₀H₃₆, which is sufficiently stable. Hydrogenation of fullerene C₇₀ gives a series of polyhydrides C₇₀H _n (n=36–46), and the main product is C₇₀H₃₆. The dehydrogenation of C₆₀H₃₆ by 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone is not quantitative and results in the formation of fullerene derivatives along with C₆₀. The comparison of the IR and¹H and¹³C NMR spectral data for solid C₆₀H₃₆ with the theoretical calculations suggests that the fullerene hydride has aT-symmetric structure and contains four isolated benzenoid rings located at tetrahedral positions on the surface of the closed skeleton of the molecule. Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya. No. 4, pp. 671–678, April, 1997.     

Synthesis of 2‐ and 2,7‐Functionalized Pyrene Derivatives: An Application of Selective C?H Borylation

An efficient synthetic route to 2‐ and 2,7‐substituted pyrenes is described. The regiospecific direct C? H borylation of pyrene with an iridium‐based catalyst, prepared in situ by the reaction of [{Ir(μ‐OMe)cod}₂] (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene) with 4,4′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine, gives 2,7‐bis(Bpin)pyrene ( 1 ) and 2‐(Bpin)pyrene ( 2 , pin=OCMe₂CMe₂O). From 1 , by simple derivatization strategies, we synthesized 2,7‐bis(R)‐pyrenes with R=BF₃K ( 3 ), Br ( 4 ), OH ( 5 ), B(OH)₂ ( 6 ), and OTf ( 7 ). Using these nominally nucleophilic and electrophilic derivatives as coupling partners in Suzuki–Miyaura, Sonogashira, and Buchwald–Hartwig cross‐coupling reactions, we obtained 2,7‐bis(R)‐pyrenes with R=(4‐CO₂C₈H₁₇)C₆H₄ ( 8 ), Ph ( 9 ), C≡CPh ( 10 ), C≡C[{4‐B(Mes)₂}C₆H₄] ( 11 ), C≡CTMS ( 12 ), C≡C[(4‐NMe₂)C₆H₄] ( 14 ), C≡CH ( 15 ), N(Ph)[(4‐OMe)C₆H₄] ( 16 ), and R=OTf, R′=C≡CTMS ( 13 ). Lithiation of 4 , followed by reaction with CO₂, yielded pyrene‐2,7‐dicarboxylic acid ( 17 ), whilst borylation of 2‐tBu‐pyrene gave 2‐tBu‐7‐Bpin‐pyrene ( 18 ) selectively. By similar routes (including Negishi cross‐coupling reactions), monosubstituted 2‐R‐pyrenes with R=BF₃K ( 19 ), Br ( 20 ), OH ( 21 ), B(OH)₂ ( 22 ), [4‐B(Mes)₂]C₆H₄ ( 23 ), B(Mes)₂ ( 24 ), OTf ( 25 ), C≡CPh ( 26 ), C≡CTMS ( 27 ), (4‐CO₂Me)C₆H₄ ( 28 ), C≡CH ( 29 ), C₃H₆CO₂Me ( 30 ), OC₃H₆CO₂Me ( 31 ), C₃H₆CO₂H ( 32 ), OC₃H₆CO₂H ( 33 ), and O(CH₂)₁₂Br ( 34 ) were obtained from 2 . These derivatives are of synthetic and photophysical interest because they contain donor, acceptor, and conjugated substituents. The crystal structures of compounds 4 , 5 , 7 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 23 , 26 , and 28 – 31 have also been obtained from single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction data, revealing a diversity of packing modes, which are described in the Supporting Information. A detailed discussion of the structures of 1 and 2 , their polymorphs, solvates, and co‐crystals is reported separately.     

Computational Study of the Substitution Effect on the Mechanism for the Gold(I)‐Catalyzed Ring Expansions of Unactivated Alkynylcyclopropanes

The ring expansion reactions of unactivated alkynylcyclopropanes X‐C≡C‐C₃H₅ → X‐C=C₄H₅ (X = H, F, Cl, Me, OMe, NMe₂, CMe₃) were examined using the density functional theory calculations. All of the structures were completely optimized at the B3LYP/6‐311++G** level of theory. For clarify the effect of the cationic gold(I), we also added AuPH₃⁺ as the catalyst into the system and the structures for Au were calculated at the B3LYP/LANL2DZ level of theory. The main finding of this work is that the singlet‐triplet splitting of X‐C≡C‐C₃H₅ play an important role in determining the kinetic and thermodynamic stability of the unactivated ring expansion reactions. When X‐C≡C‐C₃H₅ with a smaller singlet‐triplet splitting is utilized, the reaction has a smaller activation energy and a larger exothermicity.     

Crystal and molecular structure of (μ-p-CH3C6H4C2S) (μ-n-C3H7S)Fe2(CO)6Co2(CO)6

The crystal and molecular structure of the complex containing cobalt-carbon and iron-sulfur cluster cores, (μ-p-CH₃C₆H₄C₂S) (μ-n-C₃H₇S)Fe₂(CO)₆Co₂(CO)₆, has been determined by X-ray diffraction method. The crystals are triclinic, space group P&1bar;, with a — 9.139(2), b=9.610(1), c-17.183(2) Å, α = 84.36(1), β-89.45(1), γ=88.15(1)°, V-1501.0 ų; Z=2, D_c=1.74 g/cm³. R=0.072, Rw=0.081. The results of the structure determination show a cobalt-carbon cluster core formed through the reaction of (μ-p-CH₃C₆H₄C₂S)(μ-n-C₃H₇S)Fe₂(CO)₆ with Co₂(CO)₈. In the cobalt-carbon cluster core, the bond length of the original C≡C lengthened to 1.324 Å which is close to the typical value of carbon-carbon double bond. The groups connecting the carbons of the cluster core are in cis position and lie on the opposite side of cobalt atoms. In this complex, the conformation of —SC₃H₇ is e-type, while that of —SC₂C₆H₄CH₃ is a-type.     

Hydrogallierungsreaktionen mit den Monoalkinen H5C6‐C≡C‐SiMe3 und H5C6‐C≡C‐CMe3 – cis/trans‐Isomerie und Substituentenaustausch

Hydrogallation Reactions Involving the Monoalkynes H₅C₆‐C≡C‐SiMe₃ and H₅C₆‐C≡C‐CMe₃ – cis/trans Isomerisation and Substituent Exchange Phenyl‐trimethylsilylethyne, H₅C₆‐C≡C‐SiMe₃, reacted with different dialkylgallium hydrides, R₂Ga‐H (R = Me, Et, nPr, iPr, tBu), by the addition of one Ga‐H bond to its C≡C triple bond (hydrogallation). The gallium atoms attacked selectively those carbon atoms, which were also attached to trimethylsilyl groups. The cis arrangement of Ga and H across the resulting C=C double bonds resulted only for the sterically most shielded di(tert‐butyl)gallium derivative, while in all other cases spontaneous cis/trans rearrangement occurred with the quantitative formation of the trans addition products. The diethyl compound Et₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅ ( 2 ) gave by substituent exchange the secondary products EtGa[C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅]₂ ( 7 , Z,Z) and Ga[C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅]₃ ( 8 ). Interestingly, compound 8 has two alkenyl groups with a Z configuration, while the third C=C double bond has the cis arrangement of Ga and H (E configuration). The reversibility of the cis/trans isomerisation of hydrogallation products was observed for the first time. tert‐Butyl‐phenylethyne gave the simple addition product, R₂Ga(C₆H₅)=C(H)‐CMe₃ ( 9 ), only with di(n‐propyl)gallium hydride.     

Molecular and electronic structures of some trimers of polyhedral carbon clusters

Geometries and electronic structures of four crimped linear carbon clusters were modeled by the MNDO/PM3 method. Three of these clusters (C₁₈₀ clusters) are trimers ofI _h -C₆₀ fullene, which differ from each other by the mode of linkage of the monomers. The fourth cluster (C₁₇₂ pseudo-trimer) consists of two C₅₈ fragments of C₆₀ fullerene linked to each other through the C₅₆ cluster. The optimum geometric parameters, hieats of formation, and ionization potentials were calculated for the above-mentioned systems as well as for the corresponding C₁₂₀ and C₁₁₆ dimers. The possibility of extrapolation of the data on dimers and trimers to linear oligomers of the C₆₀ and C₅₆ clusters with a larger number of repeating fragments is discussed. The character of linkages of monomers was analyzed for the two trimers under consideriation, which have the most complex mode of binding of the C₆₀ fullerene molecule and its fragments, using the C₆₀H₂₀ and C₇₂H₂₄ molecules (whose carbon skeletons model the structures of these linkages) as examples. Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 1, pp. 7–12, January, 1998.