Expression of Dirichlet boundary conditions in terms of the strain tensor in linearized elasticity

In a previous work, it was shown how the linearized strain tensor field $\mathbf{e}:=\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{?}{\mathit{u}}^T+\mathbf{?}\mathit{u})\in {\mathbb{L}}^2(\Omega )$ can be considered as the sole unknown in the Neumann problem of linearized elasticity posed over a domain $\Omega ?{\mathbb{R}}^3$, instead of the displacement vector field $\mathit{u}\in {\mathit{H}}^1(\Omega )$ in the usual approach. The purpose of this Note is to show that the same approach applies as well to the Dirichlet–Neumann problem. To this end, we show how the boundary condition $\mathit{u}=\mathbf{0}$ on a portion ${\Gamma }_0$ of the boundary of Ω can be recast, again as boundary conditions on ${\Gamma }_0$, but this time expressed only in terms of the new unknown $\mathbf{e}\in {\mathbb{L}}^2(\Omega )$.     

Homogenization of a Dirichlet semilinear elliptic problem with a strong singularity at u = 0 in a domain with many small holes

In the present paper we perform the homogenization of the semilinear elliptic problem

$\{\begin{array}{cc}{u}^{\epsilon }\ge 0\hfill & \text{in}{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon },\hfill \\ ?divA(x)D{u}^{\epsilon }=F(x,u^{\epsilon })\hfill & \text{in}{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon },\hfill \\ u^{\epsilon }=0\hfill & \text{on}?{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon }.\hfill \end{array}$

In this problem $F(x,s)$ is a Carathéodory function such that $0\le F(x,s)\le h(x)/\mathrm{\Gamma }(s)$ a.e. $x\in \mathrm{\Omega }$ for every $s>0$, with h in some $L^r(\mathrm{\Omega })$ and Γ a $C^1([0,+\infty [)$ function such that $\mathrm{\Gamma }(0)=0$ and ${\mathrm{\Gamma }}^{\prime }(s)>0$ for every $s>0$. On the other hand the open sets ${\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon }$ are obtained by removing many small holes from a fixed open set Ω in such a way that a “strange term” $\mu u^0$ appears in the limit equation in the case where the function $F(x,s)$ depends only on x.We already treated this problem in the case of a “mild singularity”, namely in the case where the function $F(x,s)$ satisfies $0\le F(x,s)\le h(x)(\frac{1}{s}+1)$. In this case the solution $u^{\epsilon }$ to the problem belongs to $H_0^1({\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon })$ and its definition is a “natural” and rather usual one.In the general case where $F(x,s)$ exhibits a “strong singularity” at $u=0$, which is the purpose of the present paper, the solution $u^{\epsilon }$ to the problem only belongs to $H_{\text{loc}}^1({\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon })$ but in general does not belong to $H_0^1({\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon })$ anymore, even if $u^{\epsilon }$ vanishes on $?{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon }$ in some sense. Therefore we introduced a new notion of solution (in the spirit of the solutions defined by transposition) for problems with a strong singularity. This definition allowed us to obtain existence, stability and uniqueness results.In the present paper, using this definition, we perform the homogenization of the above semilinear problem and we prove that in the homogenized problem, the “strange term” $\mu u^0$ still appears in the left-hand side while the source term $F(x,u^0)$ is not modified in the right-hand side.     

A Hardy type inequality for W02,1(Ω) functions

We consider functions $u\in W_0^{2,1}(\Omega )$, where $\Omega ?{\mathbb{R}}^N$ is a smooth bounded domain. We prove that $\frac{u(x)}{d(x)}\in W_0^{1,1}(\Omega )$ with$6\mathrm{?}\left(\frac{u(x)}{d(x)}\right)6_{L^1(\Omega )}?C6u{6}_{W^{2,1}(\Omega )},$ where d is a smooth positive function which coincides with $\mathrm{dist}(x,?\Omega )$ near ?Ω and C is a constant depending only on d and Ω.     

A Schauder and Riesz basis criterion for non-self-adjoint Schrödinger operators with periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions

Under the assumption that $V\in L^2([0,\pi ];dx)$, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of spectral data for (non-self-adjoint) Schrödinger operators $?d^2/d{x}^2+V$ in $L^2([0,\pi ];dx)$ with periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions to possess a Riesz basis of root vectors (i.e., eigenvectors and generalized eigenvectors spanning the range of the Riesz projection associated with the corresponding periodic and antiperiodic eigenvalues).We also discuss the case of a Schauder basis for periodic and antiperiodic Schrödinger operators $?d^2/d{x}^2+V$ in $L^p([0,\pi ];dx)$, $p\in (1,\infty )$.     

Unique continuation for first-order systems with integrable coefficients and applications to elasticity and plasticity

Let $\Omega ?{\mathbb{R}}^N$ be a Lipschitz domain and Γ be a relatively open and non-empty subset of its boundary ?Ω. We show that the solution to the linear first-order system:(1)$\mathrm{?}\zeta =G\zeta ,\zeta {|}_{\Gamma }=0,$ vanishes if $G\in {\mathsf{L}}^1(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^{(N\times N)\times N})$ and $\zeta \in {\mathsf{W}}^{1,1}(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^N)$. In particular, square-integrable solutions ζ of (1) with $G\in {\mathsf{L}}^1\cap {\mathsf{L}}^2(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^{(N\times N)\times N})$ vanish. As a consequence, we prove that:$???:{\mathsf{C}}_{°}^{\infty }(\Omega ,\Gamma ;{\mathbb{R}}^3)\to [0,\infty ),u?6\mathrm{sym}\left(\mathrm{?}u{P}^{?1}\right)6_{{\mathsf{L}}^2(\Omega )}$ is a norm if $P\in {\mathsf{L}}^{\infty }(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^{3\times 3})$ with $\mathrm{Curl}P\in {\mathsf{L}}^p(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^{3\times 3})$, $\mathrm{Curl}{P}^{?1}\in {\mathsf{L}}^q(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^{3\times 3})$ for some $p,q>1$ with $1/p+1/q=1$ as well as $\det P?c^{+}>0$. We also give a new and different proof for the so-called ‘infinitesimal rigid displacement lemma’ in curvilinear coordinates: Let $\Phi \in {\mathsf{H}}^1(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^3)$, $\Omega ?{\mathbb{R}}^3$, satisfy $\mathrm{sym}(\mathrm{?}{\Phi }^{?}\mathrm{?}\Psi )=0$ for some $\Psi \in {\mathsf{W}}^{1,\infty }(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^3)\cap {\mathsf{H}}^2(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^3)$ with $\det \mathrm{?}\Psi ?c^{+}>0$. Then there exists a constant translation vector $a\in {\mathbb{R}}^3$ and a constant skew-symmetric matrix $A\in \mathfrak{so}(3)$, such that $\Phi =A\Psi +a$.     

Weak version of restriction estimates for spheres and paraboloids in finite fields

We study $L^p-L^r$ restriction estimates for algebraic varieties in d-dimensional vector spaces over finite fields. Unlike the Euclidean case, if the dimension d is even, then it is conjectured that the $L^{(2d+2)/(d+3)}-L^2$ Stein–Tomas restriction result can be improved to the $L^{(2d+4)/(d+4)}-L^2$ estimate for both spheres and paraboloids in finite fields. In this paper we show that the conjectured $L^p-L^2$ restriction estimate holds in the specific case when test functions under consideration are restricted to d-coordinate functions or homogeneous functions of degree zero. To deduce our result, we use the connection between the restriction phenomena for our varieties in d dimensions and those for homogeneous varieties in $(d+1)$ dimensions.     

Analysis of some injection bounds for Sobolev spaces by wavelet decomposition

We consider the Sobolev spaces $H^s(\Omega )$ and $H_0^s(\Omega )$ and the Besov spaces $B_{2,\infty }^{1/2}(\Omega )$, where Ω is a sufficiently regular (see Lemma 2) subdomain of ${\mathbb{R}}^2$. It is well known that for the values of $s\in [0,1/2)$ the two Sobolev spaces coincide, with equivalence of the norms, and that the inclusion $B_{2,\infty }^{1/2}(\Omega )?H^s(\Omega )$ holds. The Note is concerned with the explicit analysis of the constants appearing in the continuity bounds for the injections $H^s(\Omega )?H_0^s(\Omega )$ and $B_{2,\infty }^{1/2}(\Omega )?H^s(\Omega )$ and of their dependence on the regularity s of the spaces. The analysis is carried out by using the wavelet characterization of the corresponding norms.     

Powerful numbers in (1ℓ + qℓ)(2ℓ + qℓ)⋯(nℓ + qℓ)

Let q be a positive integer. Recently, Niu and Liu proved that, if $n\ge \max ?\{q,1198?q\}$, then the product $(1^3+q^3)(2^3+q^3)?(n^3+q^3)$ is not a powerful number. In this note, we prove (1) that, for any odd prime power ? and $n\ge \max ?\{q,11?q\}$, the product $(1^{?}+q^{?})(2^{?}+q^{?})?(n^{?}+q^{?})$ is not a powerful number, and (2) that, for any positive odd integer ?, there exists an integer $N_{q,?}$ such that, for any positive integer $n\ge N_{q,?}$, the product $(1^{?}+q^{?})(2^{?}+q^{?})?(n^{?}+q^{?})$ is not a powerful number.     

A sharp Balian–Low uncertainty principle for shift-invariant spaces

A sharp version of the Balian–Low theorem is proven for the generators of finitely generated shift-invariant spaces. If generators ${\{f_k\}}_{k=1}^K?L^2({\mathbb{R}}^d)$ are translated along a lattice to form a frame or Riesz basis for a shift-invariant space V, and if V has extra invariance by a suitable finer lattice, then one of the generators $f_k$ must satisfy ${\int }_{{\mathbb{R}}^d}|x||f_k(x){|}^{2}dx=\infty$, namely, $\stackrel{?}{f_k}?H^{1/2}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$. Similar results are proven for frames of translates that are not Riesz bases without the assumption of extra lattice invariance. The best previously existing results in the literature give a notably weaker conclusion using the Sobolev space $H^{d/2+?}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$; our results provide an absolutely sharp improvement with $H^{1/2}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$. Our results are sharp in the sense that $H^{1/2}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$ cannot be replaced by $H^s({\mathbb{R}}^d)$ for any $s<1/2$.     

The visible perimeter of an arrangement of disks

Given a collection of n opaque unit disks in the plane, we want to find a stacking order for them that maximizes their visible perimeter, the total length of all pieces of their boundaries visible from above. We prove that if the centers of the disks form a dense point set, i.e., the ratio of their maximum to their minimum distance is $O(n^{1/2})$, then there is a stacking order for which the visible perimeter is $\Omega (n^{2/3})$. We also show that this bound cannot be improved in the case of a sufficiently small $n^{1/2}\times n^{1/2}$ uniform grid. On the other hand, if the set of centers is dense and the maximum distance between them is small, then the visible perimeter is $O(n^{3/4})$ with respect to any stacking order. This latter bound cannot be improved either.Finally, we address the case where no more than c disks can have a point in common.These results partially answer some questions of Cabello, Haverkort, van Kreveld, and Speckmann.     

Neumann problem for a quasilinear elliptic equation in a varying domain

We investigate the Neumann problem for a nonlinear elliptic operator of Leray–Lions type in ${\Omega }^{(s)}=\Omega \backslash F^{(s)}$, $s=1,2,\dots$, where Ω is a domain in ${\mathbf{R}}^n$$(n?3)$, $F^{(s)}$ is a closed set located in the neighborhood of a $(n?1)$-dimensional manifold Γ lying inside Ω. We study the asymptotic behavior of $u^{(s)}$ as $s\to \infty$, when the set $F^{(s)}$ tends to Γ. To cite this article: M. Sango, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 342 (2006).