Extraction of a quality assurance sediment sample for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/F)

An experimental design for two variables at three and four levels was used to investigate the Soxhlet extraction of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/ dibenzofurans (PCDD/F) from a quality assurance sediment. The first variable was the solvent: toluene/methanol, toluene (both Soxhlet) and toluene in Soxhlet-Dean-Stark equipment. The second variable were four different bulks: silica, sulfuric acid treated silica, sodium carbonate and no bulk. Extractions with toluene/methanol and sulfuric acid provided only a small contribution to the overall extraction efficiency. Toluene/methanol preferably improved the extraction of PCDD, and the sulfuric acid improved the PCDF extraction. This was likely to reflect improved extraction efficiency of substructures in the sediment as pulp effluent remains (fiber) and fly-ash particulate. A previously found PCDD formation in extractions using toluene/methanol in presence of sodium carbonate was reproduced. A designed supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) experiment was also accomplished, however even under the best used conditions some PCDD/F were retained on the particulate compared to Soxhlet extraction. Variations in extraction efficiency in Soxhlet and SFE indicated that different subfractions of PCDD/F are connected to the matrix with different mechanisms, thus indicating that different PCDD/F fractions had different abilities to equilibrate also in the real environment. Received: 5 December 1997 / Revised: 9 February 1998 / Accepted: 15 February 1998     

Supercritical fluid extraction of vapor-deposited pyrene from carbonaceous coal stack ash

The efficiencies of extraction of vapor-deposited pyrene from a high-carbon coal stack ash by Soxhlet extraction with methanol, ultrasonic extraction with toluene, acid pretreatment and subsequent ultrasonic extraction with toluene, batch extraction with toluene, and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) are compared. SFE using CO(2) or isobutane yielded extraction recoveries virtually identical with those obtained using ultrasonic or Soxhlet extraction processes. Collection of the SFE extract was performed by expansion into a solvent or onto the head of a gas chromatography (GC) column. No loss of extracted pyrene was observed upon collection of methanol-modified CO(2) SFE by expansion into methanol. Also, no loss of pure CO(2) SFE extract was observed upon collection on the head of a GC column. However, use of a methanol or toluene modifier for CO(2) SFE directly coupled to GC effected complete loss of extracted pyrene.     

Development of supercritical fluid extraction with a solid-phase trapping for fast estimation of toxic load of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins-dibenzofurans in sawmill soil

A method consisting of automated supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) with simultaneous cleanup by a solid-phase trap was developed for fast analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs) in soil. SFE was optimised to replace conventional liquid-based methods in routine analyses of PCDD/PCDFs in sawmill soil contaminated by a chlorophenol formulation. PCDD/PCDFs were quantitatively extracted in 60 min using CO2 at 400 atm and 100 degrees C without a modifier. A trap containing a small amount of activated carbon mixed with Celite efficiently collected PCDD/PCDFs after SFE. After SFE co-extracted impurities were eluted out from the trap with 4 ml of hexane and PCDD/PCDFs were eluted with 10 ml of toluene. The concentrations and TCDD-equivalent of PCDD/PCDFs corresponded to the results of traditional solvent extraction method (Soxhlet) in six sawmill soils tested. The performance of the trap was maintained over a long period of time (nearly 100 extractions).     

Development and validation of a method for analyzing polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in sewage sludge samples

Summary A method has been developed for the analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) and dibenzofurans (PCDF) in sewage sludge samples. It was found that PCDD/F are best Soxhlet extracted from the matrix with toluene for 24h, after having tested other solvents (dichloromethane and hexane/acetone 41/59) and other extraction times. Several clean up steps (sulfuric acid, multilayer silica and Florisl columns) and concentration are required prior to analysis of the extract by high resolution gas chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (HRGC-HRMS). The complete procedure has been validated and the accuracy and precision data (repeatability and reproducibility) are given. The method is linear in the range studied and the limit of detection ranges between 0.2 and 2.2 pg g⁻¹ of dry matter for the 2,3,7,8-substituted congeners. Moreover, the suitability of the method has been checked in an international interlaboratory comparison. The successful application of this method to several samples from Catalan and Dutch urban wastewater treatment plants was demonstrated.     

“永固紫”染料和四氯苯醌中多氯代二苯并二/呋喃的分析

 采用浓硫酸对5种不同来源的四氯苯醌和“永固紫”染料样品进行溶解分散,用甲苯提取和 多层色谱柱纯化,利用同位素稀释法及高分辨气相色谱/质谱 (HRGC/HRMS)联用技术,测定 了其中的多氯代二苯并二/呋喃(PCDD/F)的质量比。结果表明“永固紫”染料及其原料中P CDD/F的质量比异常高,八氯代二苯并二/呋喃(OCDD/F)已达到μg/g级甚至100 μg/g级,七氯代二苯并二/呋喃(HpCDD/F)和六氯代二苯并二/呋喃(HxCDD/F)质量比也达到 ng/g级。所有样 品的毒性当量浓度(TEQ)均已超过10 pg/g的危险水平,是纺织品中PCDD/F的一类重要污染源 。并进一步探讨了PCDD/F的来源。     

Supercritical fluid extraction of atrazine and its metabolites from soil

Soxhlet (methanol) and SFE extraction with carbon dioxide in the presence of modifiers at different temperatures (100–200°C) for the extraction of atrazine and its main metabolites from a soil sample were compared. The most effective extraction conditions for both atrazine and its metabolites (i.e. deethylatrazine and deisopropylatrazine) were Co₂ modified with 20% molar methanol-trifluoroacetic acid (MeOH-TFA) (TFA 0.65M in MeOH) at 100°C, leading to an extraction efficiency comparable with that of Soxhlet extraction with MeOH for atrazine and ca. 20% higher for its main metabolites. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of SFE was lower than that obtained by Soxhlet extraction, probably because of less interference in the cGC-NPD determination. All the other modifiers evaluated (acetone, triethylamine, and methanol) were less effective than MeOH-TFA for the extraction of atrazine and its metabolites from a soil sample, even at high molar concentrations (20%) and use of higher extraction temperatures (200°C). These results indicate the importance of matrix effects and the need of the selection of an appropriate modifier in order to obtain quantitative extractions by SFE.     

Pressurized liquid extraction of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans and coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls from contaminated soil

Extraction solvents for pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) used to extract polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDFs), and coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls (Co-PCBs) from contaminated soil were investigated. The PCDD/PCDFs and Co-PCBs in Certified Reference Material: CRM 0422 (Forest soil) were extracted using toluene, n-hexane, acetone, acetone/toluene and acetone/n-hexane (1:1, v/v). Soxhlet extraction was the reference method. Results demonstrated that PLE using mixed solvents produced better analyte recoveries than the single solvents. However, these results were lower than those for Soxhlet extraction. Additional extraction cycles using mixed solvents achieved better recovery results. Mixed solvents and several extraction cycles were necessary for satisfactory extraction of more tightly bound PCDD/PCDFs and Co-PCBs from soil.     

Nigella sativa extract as a potent antioxidant for petrochemical-induced oxidative stress

Various beneficial properties has been attributed to Nigella sativa, including its antioxidant potential. Previously, it was reported that supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) could be used to obtain N. sativa extract rich in antioxidants. In the present study, N. sativa extracts prepared using the previously optimized SFE as well as the traditional Soxhlet extraction approaches were analyzed for various known antioxidants. N. sativa extracts were found to prevent protein carbonyl formation as well as depletion of intracellular glutathione (GSH) in fibroblasts exposed to toluene. Furthermore, partially purified SFE and Soxhlet fractions could prevent loss of hepatic GSH in toluene-induced oxidative stressed Wistar rats as well as in L929 fibroblasts. The results showed that SFE-produced N. sativa extract is richer in antioxidants than the Soxhlet approach. It was also shown using preparative silica gel and reverse phase chromatography that different fractions of SFE-extracted or Soxhlet-extracted N. sativa had different levels of protective effects with regards to GSH depletion in vivo as well as in cell culture. Although fractions rich in thymoquinone were found to be most potent in terms of antioxidant capacity, the data indicates that the protective effects of N. sativa may not only be due to thymoquinone, but perhaps other antioxidants.     

Supercritical fluid extraction of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin from sediment samples

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is a promising technique for the extraction of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) from environmental matrices such as contaminated sediments. The ability of SFE to solubilize many organic contaminants is well documented in industrial processes but its analytical applications were exploited just recently. In this study supercritical carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide and their mixtures with 2% methanol were used to extract 2,3,7,8-TCDD from aquatic sediments. An attractive feature of this process is that the carbon dioxide, being a virtually inert fluid, leaves no solvent residue on the processed sediment. Almost 100% of the 2,3,7,8-TCDD can be extracted from a sediment spiked with 200 μg/kg 2,3,7,8-TCDD in 30 minutes by using supercritical carbon dioxide + 2% methanol. Cleanup procedure is compared with the Soxhlet extraction procedure currently used as a standard method for extracting dioxins from sediment samples.     

A two-step supercritical fluid extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from roadside soil samples

A two-step procedure for the supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil samples was developed. The procedure consists of a static supercritical fluid treatment in a closed extraction cell at a high temperature (T=250 or 340degreesC for 20 min) and an SFE with a solvent trapping. During the static phase, the sample is exposed to a supercritical organic solvent (methanol, toluene, dichloromethane, ACN, acetone, and hexane). The solvent penetrates particles of the matrix to substitute strongly bonded molecules and dissolves the analytes in the supercritical phase. At ambient temperature, supercritical fluids became liquid and lost their solvation abilities. Most of the analytes condense on the surface of the particles or on the extraction cell walls without forming strong bonds or penetrating deep into the matrix. Thus, the pretreatment liberates the analytes and they behave similar to those in freshly spiked samples. The common SFE with toluene-modified CO2 as an extraction fluid follows the static phase. With the use of the most suitable extraction phases (toluene, ACN), the extraction efficiency of the combined procedure is much higher (approximately100%). The results of the combined procedure are compared to the SFE procedure of the same untreated sample (difference less than 5%) and to the Soxhlet extraction. The extracts were analyzed using a GC with the flame ionization detection.     

Use of supercritical fluid extraction in the analysis of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans

Summary Supercritical fluid extraction is a powerful technique with great promise in organic analytical chemistry. To date little has been published on the use of SFE in the analysis of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/F). The data point, however, to the feasibility of a selective and exhaustive extraction of these compounds. Solid phase trapping of the extracted PCDD/F allows for on-line class separation and clean-up and seems to be the most flexible choice of collection mode. Both CO₂ and N₂O can be used as supercritical fluids. Extraction recoveries can be improved with a small percentage of an organic solvent added to the supercritical fluid as modifier. Methanol and benzene have proven to be efficient. Relatively strong supercritical fluid conditions are needed for the extraction of PCDD/F from fly ash (350–400 atm at 330–370 K). Spiked internal standards are easily extracted even at mild conditions whereas native PCDD/F are not; thus caution should be taken when an isotopic dilution technique is used for a future evaluation of SFE in the analysis of PCDD/F.     

Optimization of pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) of dioxin-furans and dioxin-like PCBs from environmental samples

Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) applying three extraction cycles, temperature and pressure, improved the efficiency of solvent extraction when compared with the classical Soxhlet extraction. Polychlorinated-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and dioxin-like PCBs (coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls (Co-PCBs)) in two Certified Reference Materials [DX-1 (sediment) and BCR 529 (soil)] and in two contaminated environmental samples (sediment and soil) were extracted by ASE and Soxhlet methods. Unlike data previously reported by other authors, results demonstrated that ASE using n-hexane as solvent and three extraction cycles, 12.4 MPa (1800 psi) and 150 degrees C achieves similar recovery results than the classical Soxhlet extraction for PCDFs and Co-PCBs, and better recovery results for PCDDs. ASE extraction, performed in less time and with less solvent proved to be, under optimized conditions, an excellent extraction technique for the simultaneous analysis of PCDD/PCDFs and Co-PCBs from environmental samples. Such fast analytical methodology, having the best cost-efficiency ratio, will improve the control and will provide more information about the occurrence of dioxins and the levels of toxicity and thereby will contribute to increase human health.     

Improved Method for the Determination of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) in Sanitary Napkins

Abstract

An improved method was developed for determining highly toxic 2,3,7,8-substituted polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-furans (PCDD/Fs) in sanitary napkins. Samples were extracted by Soxhlet (50% dichloromethane/hexane) and sonication (hexane), and a multi-layer silica column was used for clean-up after acetone precipitation to separate the superabsorbent polymers. Improved separation efficiency of PCDD/Fs from sanitary napkins with a high level of superabsorbent polymers was achieved using the acetone precipitation method. Hexane was then applied as an alternative solvent to remove residual interfering substances including sticky components contained on sanitary napkins via alumina column chromatography in the second clean-up step. Recoveries approached 100% with an average relative standard deviation of less than 15%, and recoveries of internal standards were from 70.5 to 114.8% and 0.6 to 13.6% for the two extraction methods. The mean method detection limit was 0.075–0.968?pg/g for Soxhlet extraction and 0.0032–0.091?pg/g for sonication extraction. The established method meets the quality criteria for the screening of dioxins stated in EU Regulations 589/2014 and 709/2014, and therefore provides a suitable alternative for the determination of dioxins in sanitary napkins containing superabsorbent polymers.     

Validation of methods for measuring polychlorinated dibenzo- p -dioxins and furans,and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in flue gas

Method validation was performed on the collection and extraction procedures for an analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (DLPCBs) in flue gas. The adoption of the rapid pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) technique was evaluated for extraction from polyurethane foam plugs (PUFPs) and fly ash. With respect to extraction from PUFPs, dichloromethane PLE showed an extraction efficiency equivalent to that of conventional acetone Soxhlet, while toluene PLE was found to have a lower extraction efficiency from fly ash than toluene Soxhlet. The collection ability of three sampling methods, employed in the Japanese standard analytical method JIS K0311 (revised in 2005) was evaluated by evaluating the distribution of gaseous PCDD/Fs and DLPCBs in each collection compartment in sampling trains. A DiOANA® fibrous alumina filter and a PUFP, newly employed trapping devices in the revised JIS method, were found to trap gaseous analytes effectively. The validation of the two newly employed sampling methods (DiOANA and PUFP) was tested by parallel measurements of the methods with a conventional five-impinger method, and good agreements on the PCDD/Fs and DLPCBs quantities were demonstrated.     

Comparisons of soxhlet extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, supercritical fluid extraction and subcritical water extraction for environmental solids: recovery, selectivity and effects on sample matrix

Extractions of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-contaminated soil from a former manufactured gas plant site were performed with a Soxhlet apparatus (18 h), by pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) (50 min at 100 degrees C), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) (1 h at 150 degrees C with pure CO2), and subcritical water (1 h at 250 degrees C, or 30 min at 300 degrees C). Although minor differences in recoveries for some PAHs resulted from the different methods, quantitative agreement between all of the methods was generally good. However, the extract quality differed greatly. The organic solvent extracts (Soxhlet and PLE) were much darker, while the extracts from subcritical water (collected in toluene) were orange, and the extracts from SFE (collected in CH2Cl2) were light yellow. The organic solvent extracts also yielded more artifact peaks in the gas chromatography (GC)-mass spectrometry and GC-flame ionization detection chromatograms, especially compared to supercritical CO2. Based on elemental analysis (carbon and nitrogen) of the soil residues after each extraction, subcritical water, PLE, and Soxhlet extraction had poor selectivity for PAHs versus bulk soil organic matter (approximately 1/4 to 1/3 of the bulk soil organic matter was extracted along with the PAHs), while SFE with pure CO2 removed only 8% of the bulk organic matrix. Selectivities for different compound classes also vary with extraction method. Extraction of urban air particulate matter with organic solvents yields very high concentrations of n- and branched alkanes (approximately C18 to C30) from diesel exhaust as well as lower levels of PAHs, and no selectivity between the bulk alkanes and PAHs is obtained during organic solvent extraction. Some moderate selectivity with supercritical CO2 can be achieved by first extracting the bulk alkanes at mild conditions, followed by stronger conditions to extract the remaining PAHs, i.e., the least polar organics are the easiest organics to extract with pure CO2. In direct contrast, subcritical water prefers the more polar analytes, i.e., PAHs were efficiently extracted from urban air particulates at 250 degrees C, with little or no extraction of the alkanes. Finally, recent work has demonstrated that many pollutant molecules become "sequestered" as they age for decades in the environment (i.e., more tightly bound to soil particles and less available to organisms or transport). Therefore, it may be more important for an extraction method to only recover pollutant molecules that are environmentally-relevant, rather than the conventional attempts to extract all pollutant molecules regardless of how tightly bound they are to the soil or sediment matrix. Initial work comparing SFE extraction behavior using mild to strong conditions with bioremediation behavior of PAHs shows great promise to develop extraction methodology to measure environmentally-relevant concentrations of pollutants in addition to their total concentrations.     

Extraction efficiencies for hydrocarbons from sediments polluted by oily drill cuttings

Alkaline digestion with sodium hydroxide/methanol/pentane, Soxhlet extraction with methanol/dichloromethane, and ultrasonication with methanol/dichloromethane were applied to subsamples of three surface sediments polluted by oily drill cuttings to different levels (about 50, 1000 and 25 000 mg kg^?1 hydrocarbon pollution). For the two most polluted sediments the three methods were not significantly different in their ability to extract petroleum hydrocarbons from the sediments, at a 90% confidence level. The amounts extracted from the least polluted sediments using ultrasonication was, however, significantly above the amounts obtained by the other two methods. The average relative standard deviations increased in the order Soxhlet method (4.5%), alkaline digestion (12.4%) and ultrasonication (16.1%). Small differences in the relative amounts of some individual components were observed in the moderately polluted sediment.     

RP-HPTLC densitometric determination and validation of vanillin and related phenolic compounds in accelerated solvent extract of Vanilla planifolia*

A simple, fast and sensitive RP-HPTLC method is developed for simultaneous quantitative determination of vanillin and related phenolic compounds in ethanolic extracts of Vanilla planifolia pods. In addition to this, the applicability of accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) as an alternative to microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and Soxhlet extraction was also explored for the rapid extraction of phenolic compounds in vanilla pods. Good separation was achieved on aluminium plates precoated with silica gel RP-18 F(254S) in the mobile phase of methanol/water/isopropanol/acetic acid (30:65:2:3, by volume). The method showed good linearity, high precision and good recovery of compounds of interest. ASE showed good extraction efficiency in less time as compared to other techniques for all the phenolic compounds. The present method would be useful for analytical research and for routine analysis of vanilla extracts for their quality control.     

含镧金属富勒烯不同溶剂的高温高压提取

将金属原子或离子置于以Ｃ６０、Ｃ８２为代表的富勒烯笼内形成金属富勒烯包合物是目前富勒烯研究的热点课题［１～３］．合成的金属富勒烯常伴随生成较难分离的空心富勒烯,传统的索氏提取法效率又较低,使得金属富勒烯的深入研究受到限制［１,２］．本文采用改进的高温...     

SFE of PAHs from soils with a high carbon content and analyte collection via combined liquid/solid trapping

Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are recovered from a soil with a high carbon content (ca. 50%) with supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) as well as with conventional Soxhlet extraction. The influence of temperature and modifier volume on SFE efficiency and the effect of a combined liquid/solid trap for analyte collection are investigated in this study. Such traps, which make analyte collection and clean-up possible in one step, are compared with conventional analyte collection in pure organic solvents. A comparison between reproducibility and efficiency of SFE and Soxhlet extraction is presented.     

Comparison of hot Soxhlet and accelerated solvent extractions with microwave and supercritical fluid extractions for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and nitrated derivatives strongly adsorbed on soot collected inside a diesel particulate filter

Several methods of extraction were optimized to extract polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), their nitrated derivatives and heavy n-alkanes from a highly adsorptive particulate matter resulting from the combustion of diesel fuel in a diesel engine. This particular carbonaceous particulate matter, collected at high temperatures in cordierite diesel particulate filters (DPF), which are optimized for removing diesel particles from diesel engine exhaust emissions, appeared extremely refractory to extractions using the classical extracting conditions for these pollutants. In particular, the method of accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) is described in detail here. Optimization was performed through experimental design to understand the impact of each factor studied and the factors’ possible interactions on the recovery yields. The conventional extraction technique, i.e., Soxhlet extraction, was also carried out, but the lack of quantitative extractions led us to use a more effective approach: hot Soxhlet. It appeared that the extraction of the heaviest PAHs and nitroPAHs by either the optimized ASE or hot Soxhlet processes was far from complete. To enhance recovery yields, we tested original solvent mixtures of aromatic and heteroaromatic solvents. Thereafter, these two extraction techniques were compared to microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). In every case, the only solvent mixture that permitted quantitative extraction of the heaviest PAHs from the diesel soot was composed of pyridine and diethylamine, which has a strong electron-donor character. Conversely, the extraction of the nitrated PAHs was significantly improved by the use of an electron-acceptor solvent or by introducing a small amount of acetic acid into the pyridine. It was demonstrated that, for many desirable features, no single extraction technique stound out as the best: ASE, MAE or SFE could all challenge hot Soxhlet for favourable extractions. Consequently, the four optimized extraction techniques were performed to extract the naturally polluted diesel soot collected inside the DPF. Comparisons with the NIST standard reference material SRM 1650b showed that the soot collected from the DPF contained 50% fewer n-alkanes, and also markedly lower levels of PAHs (44 less concentrated) than SRM 1650b, and that the ratio of nitroPAHs to PAHs was increased. These results were attributed to the high temperatures reached inside the particulate filter during sampling runs and to the contribution of the catalytic DPF to aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons abatement.