Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

Positive solutions and large time behaviors of Schrödinger semigroups,Simon's problem

Let H = ?Δ + V, where V is a multiplication operator by a real-valued function V(x) on Rⁿ which is uniformly Hölder continuous and $\text{(1 + ¦x¦}{}^2\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{V(x) ∈ L}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ for some ? > 4. The relationship between existence of positive solutions, with growth conditions, of Hg = 0 and asymptotic behaviors as t → ∞ of e^?th is established. Using it B. Simon's problem for H on R² is solved.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators with unitary part

Let m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral $\text{H}$ = ⊕L²(v^t) dm(t) and the operator $\text{(L?)(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{?(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ on $\text{H}$, where e(s, t) = exp ∫_s^t ∫_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ). Let μ_t be the measure defined by $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dμ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{dm(s)}$ for all continuous ?, and let ?_t(z) = exp[?∫ (e^iθ + z)(e^iθ ? z)^?1dμ_t(gq)]. Call {v_t} regular iff for all $\text{t, ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦ = ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦}$ for 1 a.e.     

Large time behaviour of the solutions of a semilinear parabolic equation in RN

The asymptotic behaviour as t tends to +∞ of the solution of $\text{(?u}\text{?t)}\text{? Δu + u¦u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p\; ?\; 1}}\text{= 0}$ in $\text{R}$^N × $\text{R}$⁺, p > 1, was studied. It was proved that the behaviour depends strongly on the sign of $\text{(N + 2)}\text{N ? p}$ and also on the rate of decay of the admissible initial data u(0, x) as $\text{¦x¦}$ tends to +∞.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

Threshold phenomena for a reaction-diffusion system

We consider the pure initial value problem for the system of equations $\text{ν}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{= ν}{}_{\mathrm{xx}}\text{+ ?(ν) ? w, w}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{= ε(ν ? γw), ε, γ ? 0}$, the initial data being (ν(x, 0), w(x, 0)) = (?(x), 0). Here $\text{?(v) = ?v + H(v ? a)}$, where H is the Heaviside step function and $\text{a ? (0,}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}$. This system is of the FitzHugh-Nagumo type and has several applications including nerve conduction and distributed chemical/ biochemical systems. It is demonstrated that this system exhibits a threshold phenomenon. This is done by considering the curve s(t) defined by s(t) = sup{x: v(x, t) = a}. The initial datum, ?(x), is said to be superthreshold if lim_{t→∞ s(t) = ∞}. It is proven that the initial datum is superthreshold if ?(x) > a on a sufficiently long interval, ?(x) is sufficiently smooth, and ?(x) decays sufficiently fast to zero as $\text{¦x¦ → ∞}$.     

Sublinear perturbations of the differential equation y(n) = 0 and of the analogous difference equation

According to a result of A. Ghizzetti, for any solution y(t) of the differential equation where $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(t)+}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n?1}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t) y}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)=0}\text{(t ? 1)}$, $\text{∝}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)¦x}{}^{\mathrm{n?I?1}}\text{dx < ∞}$ (0 ?i ? n ?1, either y(t) = 0 for t ? 1 or there is an integer r with 0 ? r ? n ? 1 such that $\text{lim}\text{t → ∞}\text{y(t)}\text{t}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$ exists and ≠0. Related results are obtained for difference and differential inequalities. A special case of the former has interesting applications in the study of orthogonal polynomials.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

Generalized Bell numbers and zeros of successive derivatives of an entire function

Six different formulations equivalent to the statement that, for n ? 2, the sum ∑_{k = 1}ⁿ (?1)^kS(n, k) ≠ 0, where the S(n, k) are Stirling numbers of the second kind, are shown to hold. Using number-theoretic methods, a sufficient condition for the above statement to be true for a set of positive integers n having density 1 is then obtained. It remains open whether it is true for all n > 2. The equivalent statements then yield information on the irreducibility of the polynomials ∑_{k = 1}ⁿS(n, k)t^{k = 1} over the rationals, the nonreal zeros for successive derivatives $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dz}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{exp}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{iz}}\text{)}$, a gap theorem for the nonzero coefficients of exp(?e^z), and the continuous solution of the differential-difference equation $\text{?(x) = 1, 0 ? x < 1, ?′(x) = ?¦x¦?(x ? 1), 1 ? x < ∞}$, where ∥ denotes the greatest integer function.     

Compositions of singular integral operators

The composition of two Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operators is given explicitly in terms of the kernels of the operators. For φ?L¹(Rⁿ) and ε = 0 or 1 and ∝ φ = 0 if ε = 0, let Ker(φ) be the unique function on R^{n + 1} homogeneous of degree ?n ? 1 of parity ε that equals φ on the hypersurface x₀ = 1. Let Sing(φ, ε) denote the singular integral operator , which exists under suitable growth conditions on ? and φ. Then Sing(φ, ε₁) Sing(ψ, ε₂)f = ?2π²(∝ φ)(∝ ψ)f + Sing(A, ε₁, + ε₂)f, where

(with notation $\text{¦t¦}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{= ¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{and}\text{¦t¦}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{= ¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{sgn}\text{t}$). This result is used to show that the mapping ψ → A is a classical pseudo-differential operator of order zero if φ is smooth, with top-order symbol

$\text{ω}{}_0\text{(x,?)=?πiθ(?)∫θ(x?y)}\text{sgn}\text{y·?dy}\text{if}\text{?}{}_1\text{=1}$

,

$\text{=?2θ(?)∫θ(x?y)}\text{log}\text{|y·?|dy}\text{if}\text{?}{}_1\text{=0}$

where θ(ξ) is a cut-off function. These results are generalized to singular integrals with mixed homogeneity.     

Some existence and nonexistence theorems for solutions of degenerate parabolic equations

The initial and boundary value problem for the degenerate parabolic equation v_t = Δ(?(v)) + F(v) in the cylinder $\text{Ω × ¦0, ∞), Ω ? R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ bounded, for a certain class of point functions ? satisfying ?′(v) ? 0 (e.g., $\text{?(v) = ¦v¦}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{sign}\text{v}$) is considered. In the case that F(v) sign $\text{v ? C(1 + ¦?(v)¦}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{), α < 1}$, the equation has a global time solution. The same is true for α = 1 provided the measure of Ω is sufficiently small. In the case that $\text{F(v)}\text{?(v)}$ is nondecreasing a condition is given on the initial state v(x, 0) which implies that the solution must blow up in finite time. The existence of such initial states is discussed.     

On the multi-dimensional renewal theorem

Let X be a random variable on Rⁿ, n ? 2, having a density. Assume X has a finite exponential moment and non-zero mean vector, μ. Let ν be the corresponding renewal measure, and Q a cube. We obtain an asymptotic formula for ν(x + Q) as x → ∞ which is uniform in a small cone about the mean vector. This formula depends on moments of arbitrarily high order but depends only on the first and second moments of X in a region $\text{x · μ > ¦x¦¦μ¦(1 ? o(¦x¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?2</mtext><mtext>3</mtext>}}\text{))}$.     

Spectral representation for Schrödinger operators with long-range potentials

A spectral representation for the self-adjoint Schrödinger operator H = ?Δ + V(x), x? R³, is obtained, where V(x) is a long-range potential: $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(1</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, grad $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(3</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, $\text{ΛV(x) = O(¦ x}\text{s}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?\delta }}\text{) (δ > 0), Λ}$ being the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the unit sphere Ω. Namely, we shall construct a unitary operator $\text{F}$ from PL₂(R³) onto $\text{L}{}_2\text{((0, ∞); L}{}_2\text{(Ω)), P}$ being the orthogonal projection onto the absolutely continuous subspace for H, such that for any Borel function α(λ),

$\text{(α(H)(Pf,g)=}\text{∫}\text{0}\text{∞}\text{(α(λ)(Ff)(λ),(Fg)(λ))L}{}_2\text{(ω) dλ}$

.     

Étude d'une équation de Monge-Ampère sur les variétés kählériennes compactes

On a compact Kähler manifold of complex dimension m ? 2, let us consider the change of Kähler metric $\text{g′}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{= g}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{+ ?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{φ}$. Let F?C^∞(V × R) be a function everywhere > 0 and v a real number ≠ 0. When $\text{0 < C}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? F(x, t) ? C(¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{+ 1)}$ for all (x, t) ?V × ] ?∞, t₀], where C and t₀ are constants and $\text{1 ? a <}\text{m}\text{(m ? 1)}$, one exhibits a function φ?C^∞ (V) such that $\text{¦g′∥g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= e}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\nu </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gf</mtext>}}\text{F(x, φ ?}\text{}\text{?}\text{gf) (¦g¦}\text{and}\text{¦g′¦}$ the determinants of the metrics g and $\text{g′,}\text{}\text{?}\text{gf = (}\text{mes}\text{V)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{∝ φ dV)}$.     

Sharp nonlogarithmic Kneser theorems for fourth-order elliptic equations

Let D(?) be the Doob's class containing all functions f(z) analytic in the unit disk Δ such that f(0) = 0 and lim $\text{inf}\text{¦f(z) ¦ ? 1}$ on an arc A of ?Δ with length $\text{¦A ¦? ?}$. It is first proved that if f?D(?) then the spherical norm ∥ f ∥ = sup_z?Δ$\text{(}\text{1 ? ¦z¦}{}^2\text{)¦f′(z)¦}\text{(1 + ¦f(z)¦}{}^2\text{) ? C}{}_1\text{sin}\text{(π ? (}\text{?}\text{2}\text{))/ (π ? (}\text{g9}\text{2}\text{))}$, where C₁ = lim_n→∞$\text{∥ z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}\text{and}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< C}{}_1\text{<}\text{2}\text{e}$. Next, U represents the Seidel's class containing all non-constant functions f(z) bounded analytic in Δ such that $\text{¦tf(e}{}^{\mathrm{i0}}\text{)¦ = 1}$ almost everywhere. It is proved that inf_f?U∥f∥ = 0, and if f has either no singularities or only isolated singularities on ?Δ, then ∥f∥ ? C₁. Finally, it is proved that if f is a function normal in Δ, namely, the norm ∥f∥< ∞, then we have the sharp estimate ∥f^p∥ ? p∥f∥, for any positive integer p.     

Periodic solutions of nonlinear delay equations

Existence and uniqueness of 2π-periodic solutions of $\text{d}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{x(t)}\text{dt}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{+}\text{grad}\text{G(x(t ? τ)) = e(t, x(t), x(t ? τ)) (j = 1, 2)}$, where x(t) is in $\text{R}$ⁿ and e(t, u, v) is a given vector function, 2π-periodic in t, are shown under conditions on the spectrum of the Hessian of G. The equation is studied using a fixed point theorem in the space L²(0, 2π). One feature of this approach is that no relationship between the delay and the period is necessary.     

On a property of the set of radiation patterns

Consider the exterior boundary value problem (▽² + K²) u = 0, in Ω, k >0. $\text{u¦}{}_{\mathrm{\Gamma }}\text{= h}$, where Γ is a smooth closed connected surface in $\text{R}$³, $\text{u ~}\text{exp}\text{(ik ¦x¦)¦x¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{∝(k, n)}\text{as}\text{¦X¦→ ∞, n = x¦x¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$, ∝ is called the radiation pattern. We prove that when h runs through any dense set in L²(Γ) the corresponding radiation pattern ∝(k,n) runs through a dense set in L²(S²) for any k >0, where S² is the unit sphere in $\text{R}$³.     

Problèmes de Neumann non linéaires sur les variétés riemanniennes

Nonlinear Neumann problems on riemannian manifolds. Let ($\text{M}\text{, g}$) be a C^∞ compact riemannian manifold of dimension n ? 2 whose boundary B is an (n ? 1)-dimensional submanifold and let $\text{M =}\text{M}\text{?B}$ be the interior of $\text{M}$. Study of Neumann problems of the form: $\text{Δφ +?(φ, x) = 0}\text{in}\text{M, (}\text{dφ}\text{dn}\text{) + g(φ, y) = 0}\text{on}\text{B}$, where, for every $\text{(t, x, y) ? R × M × B, ¦?(t, x)¦}\text{and}\text{¦g(t, y)¦}$ are bounded by $\text{C(1 + ¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}\text{or}\text{C}\text{exp}\text{(¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}$. Application to the determination of a conformal metric for which the scalar curvature of M and the mean curvature of B take prescribed values.     

Oscillation theory at a finite singularity

It is well known that every weak solution (with boundary values 0) of a semilinear equation $\text{Au + ?(x, u) = g}$ is a regular solution if ? fulfils the growth condition $\text{(1) ¦?(x, u)¦? c ¦u¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>(n\; +\; 2m)</mtext><mtext>(n\; ?\; 2m)</mtext><mtext>\; ?\; ?</mtext>}}$. Here 2m is the order of A. In this paper we weaken this condition to $\text{c ¦u ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>(n\; +\; 2m)</mtext><mtext>(n\; ?\; 2m)</mtext><mtext>\; +\; 1</mtext>}}\text{? ?(x, u)u ? ?c ¦u ?}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>(n\; +\; 2m)</mtext><mtext>(n\; ?\; 2m)</mtext><mtext>\; +\; 1\; ?\; ?</mtext>}}$. This requires a technique completely different from that which may be applied in case (1).