Phase reconstruction from magnitude of band-limited multidimensional signals

In this paper, the problem of phase reconstruction from magnitude of multidimensional band-limited functions is considered. It is shown that any irreducible band-limited function f(z₁…,z_n), z_i ? $\text{C}$, i=1, …, n, is uniquely determined from the magnitude of f(x₁…,x_n): | f(x₁…,x_n)|, x_i ? $\text{R}$, i=1,…, n, except for (1) linear shifts: ^{i(α1z1+…+α_n2n+β}), β, α_i?$\text{R}$, i=1,…, n; and (2) conjugation: $\text{f}{}^1\text{(z}{}_1{}^1\text{,…,z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{)}$.     

Coefficient inequalities for a subclass of starlike functions

A function f(z) = z ? ∑^∞_{n = 2}a_nzⁿ, a_n ? 0, analytic and univalent in the unit disk, is said to be in the family $\text{T}{}^1\text{(a, b)}$, a real and b ? 0, if $\text{¦(}\text{zf′}\text{f}\text{) ? a¦ ? b}$ for all z in the unit disk. A complete characterization is found for $\text{T}{}^1\text{(a, b)}$ when a ? 1. Also, sharp coefficient bounds are determined for certain subclasses of $\text{T}{}^1\text{(a, b)}$ when a < 1; however, examples are given to show that these bounds do not remain valid for the whole family.     

Relative locality of derivations

Let H and K be symmetric linear operators on a C¹-algebra $\text{U}$ with domains D(H) and D(K). H is defined to be strongly K-local if $\text{ω(K(A)}{}^1\text{K(A)) = 0}$ implies $\text{ω(H(A)}{}^1\text{H(A)) = 0}$ for A?D(H) ∩ D(K) and ω in the state space of $\text{U}$, and H is completely strongly K-local if $\text{Ω(K(A)}{}^1\text{K(A))=0}$ implies $\text{Ω(H(A)}{}^1\text{H(A))=0}$ for A ∈ D(H) ∩ D(K) and Ω in the state of $\text{U}$, and H is cpmpletely strongly K-local if $\text{H??}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ is $\text{K??}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$-local on U?M_n for all n ? 1, where $\text{1}$_n is the identity on the n × n matrices M_n. If $\text{U}$ is abelian then strong locality and complete strong locality are equivalent. The main result states that if τ is a strongly continuous one-parameter group of ¹-automorphisms of $\text{U}$ with generator δ₀ and δ is a derivation which commutes with τ and is completely strongly δ₀-local then δ generates a group α of ¹-automorphisms of $\text{U}$. Various characterizations of α are given and the particular case of periodic τ is discussed.     

About some problems of spectral synthesis

For a given pair $\text{(A,b)∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times n}}\text{×}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times 1}}$ such that A is cyclic and b is a cyclic generator (with respect to A) of $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times 1}}$, it is shown that for every nonnegative integer m we can find a nonnegative integer t and a sequence $\text{{f}{}_{\mathrm{j\}}}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{j=0}}\text{,f}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{1\times n}}$,so that a the zeros of the rational function det P(z), where $\text{P(z) = zI ? A ? ∑}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{j=0}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{-(m+j)}}\text{b?}$_f, lie in the open unit disc in the complex plane. The result is directly applicable to a stabilizability problem for linear systems with a time delay in control action.     

Sharp nonlogarithmic Kneser theorems for fourth-order elliptic equations

Let D(?) be the Doob's class containing all functions f(z) analytic in the unit disk Δ such that f(0) = 0 and lim $\text{inf}\text{¦f(z) ¦ ? 1}$ on an arc A of ?Δ with length $\text{¦A ¦? ?}$. It is first proved that if f?D(?) then the spherical norm ∥ f ∥ = sup_z?Δ$\text{(}\text{1 ? ¦z¦}{}^2\text{)¦f′(z)¦}\text{(1 + ¦f(z)¦}{}^2\text{) ? C}{}_1\text{sin}\text{(π ? (}\text{?}\text{2}\text{))/ (π ? (}\text{g9}\text{2}\text{))}$, where C₁ = lim_n→∞$\text{∥ z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}\text{and}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< C}{}_1\text{<}\text{2}\text{e}$. Next, U represents the Seidel's class containing all non-constant functions f(z) bounded analytic in Δ such that $\text{¦tf(e}{}^{\mathrm{i0}}\text{)¦ = 1}$ almost everywhere. It is proved that inf_f?U∥f∥ = 0, and if f has either no singularities or only isolated singularities on ?Δ, then ∥f∥ ? C₁. Finally, it is proved that if f is a function normal in Δ, namely, the norm ∥f∥< ∞, then we have the sharp estimate ∥f^p∥ ? p∥f∥, for any positive integer p.     

Hilbertian and complemented finite-dimensional subspaces of Banach lattices and unitary ideals

Let 1 < p ? 2 ? q < ∞ and X be either a Banach lattice which is p-convex and q-concave or a unitary ideal of operators on l₂ which is modeled on a symmetric space which is p-convex and q-concave. If E ?X is any n-dimensional subspace, then both the distance from E to $\text{l}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ and the relative projection constant of E in X are dominated by $\text{cn}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext><mtext>\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>q</mtext>}}$.     

Explicit expressions for Bezoutians

The following commutator identity is proved:

$\text{[u(S}{}^1\text{), v(S)] = [v}{}_1\text{(S}{}^1\text{), u}{}_1\text{(S)]}$

. Here S is the n by n matrix of the truncated shift operator S = (Γ_i,i+1), i = 0, 1,…, n ? 1, and u, v are two polynomials of degree not exceeding n. The reciprocal polynomial f;₁ of a polynomial f; of degree ?n is defined by $\text{f}{}_1\text{(z) = z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{f(}\text{1}\text{z}\text{)}$. The commutator identity is closely related to some properties of the Bezoutian matrix of a pair of polynomials; it is used to obtain the Bezoutian matrix in the form of a simple expression in terms of S and S¹. To demonstrate the advantage of this expression, we show how it can be used to obtain simple proofs of some interesting corollaries.     

Periodic oscillations of coefficients of power series that satisfy functional equations

It is shown that the coefficients a_n of the power series f(z) = ∑^∞_n=1a_nzⁿ which satisfies the functional equation

$\text{f(z)=z+f(z}{}^2\text{+z}{}^3\text{)}$

display periodic oscillations; $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{～ (}\text{ø}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n}\text{) u(}\text{log}\text{n}$ as n → ∞, where $\text{ø =}\text{(1 + 5}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}\text{2}$ and u(x) is a positive, nonconstant, continuous function which is periodic with period log(4 ? ø). Similar results are obtained for a wide class of power series that satisfy similar functional equations. Power series of these types are of interest in combinatorics and computer science since they often represent generating functions. For example, the nth coefficient of the power series satisfying (1) enumerates 2, 3-trees with n leaves.     

Conditional expectations and weak and strong compactness in spaces of Bochner integrable functions

In [6, theorem IV.8.18], relatively norm compact sets K in L^p(μ) are characterized by means of strong convergence of conditional expectations, E_πf → f in L^p(μ), uniformly for f ∈ K, where (E_π) is the family of conditional expectations corresponding to the net of all finite measurable partitions.In this paper we extend the above result in several ways: we consider nets of not necessarily finite partitions; we consider spaces $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{E}}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{(μ)}$ of vector valued pth power Bochner integrable functions (and spaces M(Σ, E) of vector valued measures with finite variation); we characterize relatively strong compact sets K in $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{E}}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{(μ)}$ by means of uniform strong convergence E_πf → f, as well as relatively weak compact sets K by means of uniform weak convergence E_πf → f. Previously, in [4], uniform strong convergence (together with some other conditions) was proved to be sufficient (but not necessary) for relative weak compactness.     

On the Smale theorem in weak shape theory

We modify various lemmas from Dydak's paper on the Vietoris-Smale theorem to obtain more general results. We consider closed subsets X and Y of paracompact spaces M, N respectively, and a map F:M→N such that F∥X:X→Y is closed and surjective and X=F^-1(Y) to obtain the following result.(Theorem). If $\text{F}{}^{-1}\text{(y)ϵAC}{}^{\mathrm{n}}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(}\text{K}\text{)}$ for each y ϵ Y and N is LCⁿ⁺¹, then the morphism in-pro-$\text{π}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{[F]:π}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{U}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>K</mtext>}}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(X,x)→π}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{U}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>K</mtext>}}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(Y,y)}$ induced by the morphism $\text{[F]:U}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>K</mtext>}}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(X,x)→U}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>K</mtext>}}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(Y,y)}$ is an isomorphism of in-pro-Grp for k⩽n and an epimorphism for k=n+1.     

Some divided difference inequalities for n-convex functions

Using results from the theory of B-splines, various inequalities involving the nth order divided differences of a function f with convex nth derivative are proved; notably, $\text{f}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(z)}\text{n! ? [x}{}_0\text{,…, x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{]f}\text{?}\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 0}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(f}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}\text{(n + 1)!)}$, where z is the center of mass $\text{(}\text{1}\text{(n + 1))}\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 0}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}$.     

On the closability of some positive definite symmetric differential forms on c0∞(ω)

Let $\text{S}$ be a Dirichlet form in $\text{L}{}^2\text{(Ω; m)}$, where Ω is an open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ, n ? 2, and m a Radon measure on Ω; for each integer k with 1 ? k < n, let $\text{S}$_k be a Dirichlet form on some k-dimensional submanifold $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{k}}$ of Ω. The paper is devoted to the study of the closability of the forms E with domain $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ and defined by: $\text{(?,g)=}$$\text{E}$$\text{(?, g)+}\text{∑}\text{i}\text{p}\text{=1}$$\text{E}$k_i where 1 ? k_p < ? < n, and where , g^k_i denote restrictions of ?, g in $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ to . Conditions are given for E to be closable if, for each i = 1,…, p, one has k_i = n ? i. Other conditions are given for E to be nonclosable if, for some i, k_i < n ? i.     

Three problems on the lengths of increasing runs

Let U₁, U₂,… be a sequence of independent, uniform (0, 1) r.v.'s and let R₁, R₂,… be the lengths of increasing runs of {U_i}, i.e., X₁=R₁=inf{i:U_i+1<U_i},…, X_n=R₁+R₂+?+R_n=inf{i:i>X_n?1,U_i+1<U_i}. The first theorem states that the sequence $\text{(}\text{3}\text{2}\text{n)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(X}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?2n)}$ can be approximated by a Wiener process in strong sense.Let τ(n) be the largest integer for which R₁+R₂+?+R_τ(n)?n, $\text{R}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=n?(R}{}_1\text{+R}{}_2\text{+?+R}{}_{\mathrm{\tau (n)}}\text{)}$ and $\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{max}\text{{R}{}_1\text{,R}{}_2\text{,…,R}{}_{\mathrm{\tau (n)}}\text{,R}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{}}$. Here M_n is the length of the longest increasing block. A strong theorem is given to characterize the limit behaviour of M_n.The limit distribution of the lengths of increasing runs is our third problem.     

Enumeration of pairs of permutations

Let π = (a₁, a₂, …, a_n), ? = (b₁, b₂, …, b_n) be two permutations of $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {1, 2, …, n}}$. A rise of π is pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i < a_i+1; a fall is a pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i > a_i+1. Thus, for i = 1, 2, …, n ? 1, the two pairs a_i, a_i+1; b_i, b_i+1 are either both rises, both falls, the first a rise and the second a fall or the first a fall and the second a rise. These possibilities are denoted by RR, FF, RF, FR. The paper is concerned with the enumeration of pairs π, p with a given number of RR, FF, RF, FR. In particular if ω_n denotes the number of pairs with RR forbidden, it is proved that $\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}\text{=}\text{1}\text{?(z)}$, $\text{?(z) = ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{(-1)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$. More precisely if ω(n, k) denotes the number of pairs π, p with exactly k occurences of RR(or FF, RF, FR) then $\text{1 + ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$$\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{n?1}}{}_{\mathrm{k=0}}\text{ω(n, k)x}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(1 ? x)}\text{(?(z(1 ? x)) ? x)}$.     

Factorization of fredholm operators on analytic functions

Let Ω be a simply connected domain in the complex plane, and $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, the space of functions which are defined and analytic on $\text{Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, if K is the operator on elements $\text{u(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{of}\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of the kernels k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by is the identity operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, then the operator I ? K may be factored in the form (I ? K)(M ? W) = (I ? ΠK)(M ? ΠW). Here, W is an operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of a kernel w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by Wu = ∝_an^tw(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠW is the operator; ΠWu = ∝_{an ? 1}w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠK is the operator; ΠKu = ∑_{i = 1}^{n ? 1} ∝_ai^tk_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) ds + ∝_{an ? 1}^tk_n(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. The operator M is of the form m(t, a₁, …, a_n)I, where $\text{m ? A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ and maps elements of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ into itself by multiplication. The function m is uniquely derived from K in the following manner. The operator K defines an operator $\text{K}{}^1$ on functions u in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$, by . A determinant $\text{δ(I ? K}{}^1\text{)}$ of the operator $\text{I ? K}{}^1$ is defined as an element $\text{m}{}^1\text{(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$. This is mapped into $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ by setting a_{n + 1} = t to give m(t, a₁, …, a_n). The operator I ? ΠK may be factored in similar fashion, giving rise to a chain factorization of I ? K. In some cases all the matrix kernels k_i defining K are separable in the sense that k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) = P_i(t, a₁, …, a_n) Q_i(s, a₁, …, a_n), where P_i is a 1 × p_i matrix and Q_i is a p_i × 1 matrix, each with elements in $\text{A(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, explicit formulas are given for the kernels of the factors W. The various results are stated in a form allowing immediate extension to the vector-matrix case.     

Inverse Hölder inequalities in one and several dimensions

We study certain functionals and obtain an inverse Hölder inequality for n functions f₁^a1,…,f_n^an (f_k concave, 1 dimension).We also prove a multidimensional inverse Hölder inequality for n functions f₁,…,f_n, where $\text{?}{}^2\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2\text{? 0, i = 1,…, d, k = 1,…, n}$.Finally we give an inverse Minkowski inequality for concave functions.     

Some improvements in Neuberger's iteration procedure for solving partial differential equations

If m and n are positive integers then let S(m, n) denote the linear space over R whose elements are the real-valued symmetric n-linear functions on E_m with operations defined in the usual way. If $\text{U}$ is a function from some sphere S in E_m to R then let $\text{U}$⁽ⁱ⁾(x) denote the ith Frechet derivative of $\text{U}$ at x. In general $\text{U}$⁽ⁱ⁾(x)∈S(m,i). In the paper “An Iterative Method for Solving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations” [Advances in Math. 19 (1976), 245–265] Neuberger presents an iterative procedure for solving a partial differential equation of the form

$\text{AU}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(x)=F(x, U(x), U′(x),…,U}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(x))}$

, where k > n, $\text{U}$ is the unknown from some sphere in E_m to R, A is a linear functional on S(m, n), and F is analytic. The defect in the theory presented there was that in order to prove that the iterates converged to a solution $\text{U}$ the condition $\text{k ?}\text{n}\text{2}$ was needed. In this paper an iteration procedure that is a slight variation on Neuberger's procedure is considered. Although the condition $\text{k ?}\text{n}\text{2}$ cannot as yet be eliminated, it is shown that in a broad class of cases depending upon the nature of the functional A the restriction $\text{k ?}\text{n}\text{2}$ may be replaced by the restriction $\text{k ?}\text{3n}\text{4}$.