Periodic solutions of a quasilinear parabolic differential equation

This paper treats the quasilinear, parabolic boundary value problem $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{xx}}\text{? u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{= ??(x, t, u)}$u(0, t) = ?₁(t); u(l, t) = ?₂(t) on an infinite strip $\text{{(x, t) ¦ 0 < x < l, ?∞ < t < ∞}}$ with the functions $\text{?(x, t, u), ?}{}_1\text{(t), ?}{}_2\text{(t)}$ being periodic in t. The major theorem of the paper gives sufficient conditions on $\text{?(x, t, u)}$ for this problem to have a periodic solution u(x, t) which may be constructed by successive approximations with an integral operator. Some corollaries to this theorem offer more explicit conditions on $\text{?(x, t, u)}$ and indicate a method for determining the initial estimate at which the iteration may begin.     

Approximate solutions of functional differential equations

The author discusses the best approximate solution of the functional differential equation x′(t) = F(t, x(t), x(h(t))), 0 < t < l satisfying the initial condition x(0) = x₀, where x(t) is an n-dimensional real vector. He shows that, under certain conditions, the above initial value problem has a unique solution y(t) and a unique best approximate solution $\text{p}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(t)}$ of degree k (cf. [1]) for a given positive integer k. Furthermore, $\text{sup}{}_{\mathrm{0?t?l}}\text{¦}\text{p}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(t) ? y(t)¦ → 0}\text{as}\text{k → ∞}$, where ¦ · ¦ is any norm in Rⁿ.     

Weak solutions for a nonlinear dispersive equation

In this paper we study the existence, uniqueness, and regularity of the solutions for the Cauchy problem for the evolution equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{+ (f (u))}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{? u}{}_{\mathrm{xxt}}\text{= g(x, t), (}{}^1\text{)}\text{where}\text{u = u(x, t), x}$ is in (0, 1), 0 ? t ? T, T is an arbitrary positive real number,f(s)?C¹$\text{R}$, and g(x, t)?L^∞(0, T; L²(0, 1)). We prove the existence and uniqueness of the weak solutions for (¹) using the Galerkin method and a compactness argument such as that of J. L. Lions. We obtain regular solutions using eigenfunctions of the one-dimensional Laplace operator as a basis in the Galerkin method.     

Some asymptotic boundary behavior of solutions of non-linear parabolic initial-boundary value problems

For parabolic initial boundary value problems various results such as $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{t\; \downarrow \; 0}}\text{{}\text{(}\text{?u}\text{t6x}\text{)(0, t)}\text{(}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?x}\text{)(0, t)}}\text{= 1}$, where u satisfies $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{= a(u)(}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}\text{?x}{}^2\text{), 0 < x < 1, 0 < t ? T, u(x, 0) = 0, u(0, t) = |}{}_1\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u(1, t) = |}{}_2\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{satisfies}\text{(}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?t}\text{) = α(}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?x}{}^2\text{), 0 < x < 1, 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x, 0) = 0, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(0, t) = |}{}_1\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(1, t) = |}{}_2\text{(t), 0 < t ? T,}\text{and}\text{α = a(0)}$, are demonstrated via the maximum principle and potential theoretic estimates.     

Uniqueness and continuous dependence results for solutions of singular differential equations

Solutions of Cauchy problems for the singular equations $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{tt}}\text{+ (}\text{Ψ(t)}\text{t}\text{) u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{= Mu}$ (in a Hilbert space setting) and $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{+ Δu +}\text{∑}\text{m}\text{i=1}\text{((}\text{k}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)(}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)) + g(t)u=0}\text{in}\text{ω × |0,T)}$, ω={(x₁,…,x_M)ε$\text{R}$^m: 0 < x_i < c_i for each i=1,…,m} are shown to be unique and to depend Hölder continuously on the initial data in suitably chosen measures for 0?t < T < ∞. Logarithmic convexity arguments are used to derive the inequalities from which such results can be deduced.     

Numerical solution of a nonlinear integro-differential equation

Galerkin's method with appropriate discretization in time is considered for approximating the solution of the nonlinear integro-differential equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, t) = ∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t ? τ)}\text{?}\text{?x}\text{σ(u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{(x, τ)) dτ + f(x, t)}$, 0 < x < 1, 0 < t < T.An error estimate in a suitable norm will be derived for the difference u ? u^h between the exact solution u and the approximant u^h. It turns out that the rate of convergence of u^h to u as h → 0 is optimal. This result was confirmed by the numerical experiments.     

Convergence of the Kato approximants for evolution equations involving functional perturbations

The existence of a unique strong solution of the nonlinear abstract functional differential equation $\text{u′(t) + A(t)u(t) = F(t,u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{), u}{}_0\text{= φεC}{}^1\text{(¦?r,0¦,X),tε¦0, T¦}$, (E) is established. X is a Banach space with uniformly convex dual space and, for $\text{t? ¦0, T¦, A(t)}$ is m-accretive and satisfies a time dependence condition suitable for applications to partial differential equations. The function F satisfies a Lipschitz condition. The novelty of the paper is that the solution u(t) of (E) is shown to be the uniform limit (as n → ∞) of the sequence u_n(t), where the functions u_n(t) are continuously differentiate solutions of approximating equations involving the Yosida approximants. Thus, a straightforward approximation scheme is now available for such equations, in parallel with the approach involving the use of nonlinear evolution operator theory.     

A linearized compact difference scheme for an one-dimensional parabolic inverse problem

The parabolic equation with the control parameter is a class of parabolic inverse problems and is nonlinear. While determining the solution of the problems, we shall determinate some unknown control parameter. These problems play a very important role in many branches of science and engineering. The article is devoted to the following parabolic initial-boundary value problem with the control parameter: ∂u/∂t=∂²u/∂x²+p(t)u+?(x,t),0<x<1,0<t?T$\mathrm{\partial }u/\mathrm{\partial }t={\mathrm{\partial }}^{2}u/\mathrm{\partial }{x}^2+p(t)u+?(x\text{,}t)\text{,}0<x<1\text{,}0<t?T$ satisfying u(x,0)=f(x),0<x<1$u(x\text{,}0)=f(x)\text{,}0<x<1$; u(0,t)=_g0(t)$u(0\text{,}t)=g_0(t)$, u(1,t)=_g1(t)$u(1\text{,}t)=g_1(t)$, u(x^∗,t)=E(t),0?t?T$u(x^{\ast }\text{,}t)=E(t)\text{,}0?t?T$ where ?(x,t),f(x),_g0(t),_g1(t)$?(x\text{,}t)\text{,}f(x)\text{,}{g}_0(t)\text{,}{g}_1(t)$ and E(t)$E(t)$ are known functions, u(x,t)$u(x\text{,}t)$ and p(t)$p(t)$ are unknown functions. A linearized compact difference scheme is constructed. The discretization accuracy of the difference scheme is two order in time and four order in space. The solvability of the difference scheme is proved. Some numerical results and comparisons with the difference scheme given by Dehghan are presented. The numerical results show that the linearized difference scheme of this article improve the accuracy of the space and time direction and shorten computation time largely. The method in this article is also applicable to the two-dimensional inverse problem.     

The sum of aΩ(n) over integers n ≤ x with all prime factors between a and y

For a > 0 let $\text{ψ}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{(x, y) =}\text{Σ}\text{a}{}^{\mathrm{\Omega (n)}}$, the sum taken over all n, 1 ≤ n ≤ x such that if p is prime and p|n then a < p ≤ y. It is shown for u < about ($\text{log log}\text{x}\text{log log log}\text{x}$) that $\text{ψ}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{(x, x}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>u</mtext>}}\text{) ? x(}\text{log}\text{x)}{}^{\mathrm{a?1}}\text{p}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{(u)}$, where p_a(u) solves a delay differential equation much like that for the Dickman function p(u), and the asymptotic behavior of p_a(u) is worked out.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

On the null-controllability of nonlinear delay systems with restrained controls

Sufficient conditions are developed for the null-controllability of the nonlinear delay process (1) $\text{x}\text{?}\text{(t) = L(t, x}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{) + B(t) u(t) + f(t, x}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{, u(t))}$ when the values of the control functions u lie in an m-dimensional unit cube C^m of E^m. Conditions are placed on f which guarantee that if the uncontrolled system $\text{x}\text{?}\text{(t) = L(t, x}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{)}$ is uniformly asymptotically stable and if the linear control system x(t) = L(t, x_t) + B(t) u(t) is proper, then (1) is null-controllable.     

Singular perturbation problems for linear parabolic differential operators of arbitrary order

We consider the first initial-boundary value problem for $\text{(}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{) + ?L}{}_1\text{u + L}{}_0\text{u = f(L}{}_0$ and L₁ are linear elliptic partial differential operators) and investigate the properties of u(x, t, ?) as ? ↓ 0 in the maximum norm. Special attention is paid to approximations obtained by the boundary layer method. We use a priori estimates.     

Analyticity of solutions of nonlinear evolution equations

Analyticity in t of solutions u(t) of nonlinear evolution equations of the form $\text{u′ + A(t, u)u = ?(t, u), t > 0, u(0) = u}{}_0$, is established under suitable conditions on $\text{A(t, u), ?(t, u),}\text{and}\text{u}{}_0$. An application is given to quasilinear parabolic equations.     

Finite differences versus finite elements for solving nonlinear integro-differential equations

Consider the nonlinear integro-differential equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, t) = ∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t?τ)}\text{?}\text{?x}\text{σ(u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{(x, τ)) dτ + f(x, t)}$, 0 < x <, 0 < t < T, with appropriate initial and boundary conditions. This problem serves as a model for one-dimensional heat flow in materials with memory. The numerical solution via finite elements was discussed in B. Neta [J. Math. Anal. Appl.89 (1982), 598–611]. In this paper we compare the results obtained there with finite difference approximation from the point of view of accuracy and computer storage. It turns out that the finite difference method yields comparable results for the same mesh spacing using less computer storage.     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

Asymptotic stability of some quasilinear parabolic equations in divergence form. L∞ results

In this paper we study the behavior of solutions of some quasilinear parabolic equations of the form

$\text{(}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{) ?}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{(}\text{d}\text{dx}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{) a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x, t, u, u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{) + a(x, t, u, u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{)u + f(x, t) = O,}$

as t → ∞. In particular, the solutions of these equations will decay to zero as t → ∞ in the L^∞ norm.     

Large time behaviour of the solutions of a semilinear parabolic equation in RN

The asymptotic behaviour as t tends to +∞ of the solution of $\text{(?u}\text{?t)}\text{? Δu + u¦u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p\; ?\; 1}}\text{= 0}$ in $\text{R}$^N × $\text{R}$⁺, p > 1, was studied. It was proved that the behaviour depends strongly on the sign of $\text{(N + 2)}\text{N ? p}$ and also on the rate of decay of the admissible initial data u(0, x) as $\text{¦x¦}$ tends to +∞.     

An abstract nonlinear Volterra integrodifferential equation

We study the nonlinear Volterra equation $\text{u′(t) + Bu(t) + ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t ? s) Au(s) ds ? F(t) (0 < t < ∞) (′ =}\text{d}\text{dt}\text{), u(0) = u}{}_0$, (¹) as well as the corresponding problem with infinite delay $\text{u′(t) + Bu(t) + ∫}{}_{\mathrm{?\infty }}{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t ? s) Au(s) ds ? ?(t) (0 < t < ∞), u(t) = h(t) (?∞ < t ? 0)}$. (⁷) Under various assumptions on the nonlinear operators A, B and on the given functions a, F, f, h existence theorems are obtained for (¹) and (⁷, followed by results concerning boundedness and asymptotic behaviour of solutions on (0 ? < ∞); two applications of the theory to problems of nonlinear heat flow with “infinite memory” are also discussed.