Structural studies on supramolecular adducts of cyclodextrins with the complex [Ru([9]aneS3)(bpy)Cl]Cl

The complex [Ru([9]aneS₃)(bpy)Cl]Cl (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) was immobilised in plain β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) and permethylated β-CD (TRIMEB) to yield two adducts with a 1:1 host:guest stoichiometry. The adducts were studied by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), ¹³C{¹H} CP/MAS NMR and vibrational spectroscopy (FT-IR and Raman). Results support the formation of stable supramolecular adducts with a proposed geometry in which the coordinated bypiridine fragment of the guest is partially included in the host cavities, and the bulky [9]aneS₃ fragment protrudes out to the interstitial spaces. A packing mode is proposed for [Ru([9]aneS₃)(bpy)Cl]Cl · TRIMEB, obtained by Monte Carlo optimisation of the XRD data. TRIMEB molecules are stacked in tilted channels, with the voluminous part of the guest molecules in the inter-channel space. The behaviour of [Ru([9]aneS₃])(bpy)Cl]Cl upon CD encapsulation and the chloride ligand hydrolysis process in solution for all compounds were studied in detail by Raman spectroscopy.     

Binary and ternary oxorhenium(V) complexes: synthesis,characterization, and crystal structure

A series of anionic five-coordinate binary oxorhenium(V) complexes with dithiolato ligands, Bu₄N[ReO(L¹)₂] (1a), Bu₄N[ReO(L²)₂] (1b), and Bu₄N[ReO(L³)₂] (1c), and a series of neutral octahedral ternary oxorhenium(V) complexes of mixed dithiolato and bipyridine ligands, [ReO(L¹)(bpy)Cl] (2a), [ReO(L²)(bpy)Cl] (2b), and [ReO(L³)(bpy)Cl] (2c) (where L¹H₂ = ethane-1,2-dithiol, L²H₂ = propane-1,3-dithiol, L³H₂ = toluene-3,4-dithiol, and bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine), were isolated and characterized by physicochemical and spectroscopic methods. The solid state structure of 1c was established by X-ray crystallography. All the mononuclear oxorhenium(V) complexes are diamagnetic. The redox behavior of all the complexes has been studied voltammetrically.     

Strong Ligand Stabilization Based on π-Extension in a Series of Ruthenium Terpyridine Water Oxidation Catalysts

The substitution behavior of the monodentate Cl ligand of a series of ruthenium(II) terpyridine complexes (terpyridine (tpy)=2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine) has been investigated. ¹H NMR kinetic experiments of the dissociation of the chloro ligand in D₂O for the complexes [Ru(tpy)(bpy)Cl]Cl ( 1 , bpy=2,2’-bipyridine) and [Ru(tpy)(dppz)Cl]Cl ( 2 , dppz=dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine) as well as the binuclear complex [Ru(bpy)₂(tpphz)Ru(tpy)Cl]Cl₃ ( 3 b , tpphz=tetrapyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c:3′′,2′′-h:2′′′,3′′′-j]phenazine) were conducted, showing increased stability of the chloride ligand for compounds 2 and 3 due to the extended π-system. Compounds 1 – 5 ( 4 =[Ru(tbbpy)₂(tpphz)Ru(tpy)Cl](PF₆)₃, 5 =[Ru(bpy)₂(tpphz)Ru(tpy)(C₃H₈OS)/(H₂O)](PF₆)₃, tbbpy=4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine) are tested for their ability to run water oxidation catalysis (WOC) using cerium(IV) as sacrificial oxidant. The WOC experiments suggest that the stability of monodentate (chloride) ligand strongly correlates to catalytic performance, which follows the trend 1 > 2 > 5 ≥ 3 > 4 . This is also substantiated by quantum chemical calculations, which indicate a stronger binding for the chloride ligand based on the extended π-systems in compounds 2 and 3 . Additionally, a theoretical model of the mechanism of the oxygen evolution of compounds 1 and 2 is presented; this suggests no differences in the elementary steps of the catalytic cycle within the bpy to the dppz complex, thus suggesting that differences in the catalytic performance are indeed based on ligand stability. Due to the presence of a photosensitizer and a catalytic unit, binuclear complexes 3 and 4 were tested for photocatalytic water oxidation. The bridging ligand architecture, however, inhibits the effective electron-transfer cascade that would allow photocatalysis to run efficiently. The findings of this study can elucidate critical factors in catalyst design.     

Synthesis,structure, redox property and ligand replacement reaction of ruthenium(II) complexes containing a terpyridyl ligand with a redox active moiety

Ruthenium(II) complexes bearing a redox-active tridentate ligand 4′-(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine (tpyOMe), analogous to terpyridine, and 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy) were synthesized by the sequential replacement of Cl by CH₃CN and CO on the complex. The new ruthenium complexes were characterized by various methods including IR and NMR. The molecular structures of [Ru(tpyOMe)(bpy)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ and two kinds of [Ru(tpyOMe)(bpy)(CO)]²⁺ were determined by X-ray crystallography. The incorporation of monodentate ligands (Cl, CH₃CN and CO) regulated the energy levels of the MLCT transitions and the metal-centered redox potentials of the complexes. The kinetic data observed in this study indicates that the ligand replacement reaction of [Ru(tpyOMe)(bpy)Cl]⁺ to [Ru(tpyOMe)(bpy)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ proceeds by a solvent-assisted dissociation process.     

Mixed ligand complexes with 2-piperidine-carboxylic acid as primary ligand and ethylene diamine, 2,2′-bipyridyl, 1,10-phenanthroline and 2(2′-pyridyl)quinoxaline as secondary ligands: preparation,characterization and biological activity

Synthesis procedures are described for the new stable mixed ligand complexes, [Pd(Hpa)(pa)]Cl, [Pd(pa)(H₂O)₂]Cl, [Pd(pa)(en)]Cl, [Pd(pa)(bpy)]Cl, [Pd(pa)(phen)Cl], [Pd(pa)(pyq)Cl], cis-[MoO₂(pa)₂], [Ag(pa)(bpy)], [Ag(pa)(pyq)], trans-[UO₂(pa)(pyq)](BPh₄) and [ReO(PPh₃)(pa)₂]Cl (Hpa = 2-piperidine-carboxylic acid, en = ethylene diamine, bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl, phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, pyq = 2(2′-pyridyl)quinoxaline). Their elemental analyses, conductance, thermal measurements, Raman, IR, electronic, ¹H-n.m.r. and mass spectra have been measured and discussed. 2-Piperidine-carboxylic acid and its palladium complexes have been tested as growth inhibitors against Ehrlich ascites tumour cells (EAC) in Swiss albino mice.     

Ruthenium Complexes of an Abnormally Bound,Anionic N‐Heterocyclic Carbene

The abnormally bound, anionic NHC–borane complex [Ru(IDipp‐BF₃)(p‐cymene)Cl]₂ ( 4 ; IDipp‐BF₃=1,3‐(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)₂‐2‐BF₃(C₃HN₂)‐4‐yl) was synthesized by transmetalation from Li[(IDipp‐BF₃)₂Ag]. Addition of donors gave species of the form [Ru(IDipp‐BF₃)(p‐cymene)(L)Cl], whereas halide abstraction with Ag(Et₂O)[B(C₆F₅)₄] gave C?H activation of the methine position of the IDipp?BF₃ ligand.     

Synthesis and characterization of the [Ru<Subscript>3</Subscript>O(CH<Subscript>3</Subscript>COO)<Subscript>6</Subscript>(py)<Subscript>2</Subscript>(BPE)Ru(bpy)<Subscript>2</Subscript>Cl](PF<Subscript>6</Subscript>)<Subscript>2</Subscript> dimer

The polymetallic [Ru₃O(CH₃COO)₆(py)₂(BPE)Ru(bpy)₂Cl](PF₆)₂ complex (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, BPE = trans-1,2-bis(4-pyridil)ethylene and py = pyridine) was assembled by the combination of an electroactive [Ru₃O] moiety with a [Ru(bpy)₂(BPE)Cl] photoactive centre, and its structure was determined using positive ion electrospray (ESI-MS) and tandem mass (ESI-MS/MS) spectrometry. The [Ru₃O(CH₃COO)₆(py)₂(BPE)Ru(bpy)₂Cl]²⁺ doubly charged ion of m/z 732 was mass-selected and subject to 15 eV collision-induced dissociation, leading to a specific dissociation pattern, diagnostic of the complex structure. The electronic spectra display broad bands at 409, 491 and 692 nm ascribed to the [Ru(bpy)₂(BPE)] charge-transfer bands and to the [Ru₃O] internal cluster transitions. The cyclic voltammetry shows five reversible waves at −1.07 V, 0.13 V, 1.17 V, 2.91 V and −1.29 V (vs SHE) assigned to the [Ru₃O]^{−1/0/+1/+2/+3} and to the bpy^0/−1 redox processes; also a wave is observed at 0.96 V, assigned to the Ru^+2/+3 pair. Despite the conjugated BPE bridge, the electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical results indicate only a weak coupling through the π-system, and preliminary photophysical essays showed the compound decomposes under visible light irradiation.     

Substitution reaction of η5-cyclopentadienylruthenium(II) complexes with nitrogen,oxygen and sulfur donor ligands

The heterocycles pyridine, γ-picoline, 2,2′-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline react with [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Ru(MPh₃)₂X] (M = P, As or Sb) and [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Ru(AsPh₃)(PPh₃)X] (X = Cl, Br, I, CN, NCS or SnCl₃) to form complexes of types [(η⁵-C₅H₅)(MPh₃)(L−L)⁺X⁻ (L−L = 2,2′−bipyridine or 1,10−phenanthroline; X = Cl, Br, I, CN, NCS or SnCl₃) and [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Ru(MPh₃)LX] (M = As or Sb; L = pyridine or γ-picoline; X = Cl, Br, I, CN, NCS or SnCl₃). Interactions of dithiocarbamate (DTC) with [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Ru(SbPh₃)₂X] (X = Cl, Br or I) and acetylacetonate (acac) with parent compounds [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Ru(MPh₃)₂X (M = P or Sb; X = Cl, Br or I) yielded [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Ru(MPh₃)L] (where L = DTC or acac). The reaction products have been characterized by magnetic, spectral and microanalytical data.     

Three ruthenocene derivatives: (η5‐4,7‐dimethylindenyl)(η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)ruthenium(II), [η5‐[2](4,7)indeno[2]paracyclophanyl](η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)ruthenium(II) and bis[η5‐[2](4,7)indeno[2]paracyclophanyl]­ruthenium(II)

In the title compounds, [Ru(C₁₀H₁₅)(C₁₁H₁₁)], (III), [Ru(C₁₀H₁₅)(C₁₉H₁₇)], (IV), and [Ru(C₁₉H₁₇)₂], (V), respectively, the coordinating ring systems are planar and parallel, with the Ru atoms lying at perpendicular distances of Ru–Cp* 1.790 (1) Å and Ru–indenyl 1.836 (1) Å in (III), Ru–Cp* 1.791 (1) Å and Ru–indenyl 1.837 (1) Å in (IV), and Ru–indenyl 1.812 (1) Å and 1.809 (1) Å in (V) (Cp* is penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl). The ring conformations are eclipsed for (III), staggered for (IV) and intermediate for (V). All three compounds show short intermolecular contacts from C—H groups to some ring centroids; these could be regarded as C—H?π hydrogen bonds. The mol­ecules of each compound are thus connected via the 2₁ screw axis to form layers parallel to the xy plane.     

Synthesis, crystal structure determination, spectroscopic and electrochemical studies of trans-[Ru(PPh3)2(bbpH2)Cl]Cl·CHCl3·H20 (bbpH2=2,6-bis(benzimidazolyl) pyridine) – an infinite double columnar supramolecule in the solid state

The synthesis, crystal structure, redox and spectroscopic properties of trans-[Ru(bbpH₂)(PPh₃)₂Cl]Cl are reported. In the crystalline solvate trans-[Ru(bbpH₂)(PPh₃)₂cCl]Cl CHCl₃ H₂O, the molecular components are connected by strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding to form an infinite double column.     

Propionyl complexes of ruthenium derived from the reaction of ethylene with RuHCl(CO)2(PPh3)2

RuHCl(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ reacts with ethylene under mild conditions (25 psi, 80°C) to yield a propionyl derivative RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ which is believed to be coordinatively unsaturated. Unlike the acetyl analogue, RuCl[C[O]C₂H₅(CO)-(PPh₃)₂ does not isomerize to RuCl(C₂H₅)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ in solution. Under one atmosphere of carbon monoxide, RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅(CO)(PPh₃)₂ exists in equilibrium with two species believed to be RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ and [Ru(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂]Cl. RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ reacts with CO/ AgClO₄ to give mer-[Ru(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂]ClO₄, p-tolylisocyanide (RNC) and NaClO₄ to give cis-[Ru(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)(CNR)₂(PPh₃)₂ClO₄, and hydrochloric acid to yield the hydroxycarbene complex, RuCl₂(CO)(C[OH]C₂H₅)(PPh₃)₂.     

C−H and Si−H Activation Reactions at Ru/Ga Complexes: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Case Study on the Ru−Ga Bond

Treatment of [Ru(COD)(MeAllyl)₂] and [Ru(COD)(COT)] with GaCp* under hydrogenolytic conditions leads to reactive intermediates which activate Si−H or C−H bonds, respectively. The product complexes [Ru(GaCp*)₃(SiEt₃)H₃] ( 1 ) and [Ru(GaCp*)₃(C₇H₇)H₃] ( 2 ) are formed with HSiEt₃ or with toluene as the solvent, respectively. While 1 was isolated and fully characterized by NMR, MS, IR and SC-XRD, 2 was too labile to be isolated and was observed and characterized in situ by using mass spectrometry, including labelling experiments for the unambiguous assignment of the elemental composition. The structural assignment was confirmed by DFT calculations. The relative energies of the four isomers possible upon toluene activation at the ortho-, meta-, para- and CH₃-positions have been determined and point to aromatic C−H activation. The Ru−Ga bond was analyzed by EDA and QTAIM and compared to the Ru−P bond in the analogue phosphine compound. Bonding analyses indicate that the Ru-GaCp* bond is weaker than the Ru-PR₃ bond.     

Poly[diaqua(μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine‐κ2N:N′)bis(μ‐cyanido‐κ2C:N)bis(cyanido‐κC)nickel(II)copper(II)]: a metal–organic cyanide‐bridged framework

The structure of the title compound, [NiCu(CN)₄(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₂]_n or [{Cu(H₂O)₂}(μ‐C₁₀H₈N₂)(μ‐CN)₂{Ni(CN)₂}]_n, was shown to be a metal–organic cyanide‐bridged framework, composed essentially of –Cu–4,4′‐bpy–Cu–4,4′‐bpy–Cu– chains (4,4′‐bpy is 4,4′‐bipyridine) linked by [Ni(CN)₄]²⁻ anions. Both metal atoms sit on special positions; the Cu^II atom occupies an inversion center, while the Ni^II atom of the cyanometallate sits on a twofold axis. The 4,4′‐bpy ligand is also situated about a center of symmetry, located at the center of the bridging C—C bond. The scientific impact of this structure lies in the unique manner in which the framework is built up. The arrangement of the –Cu–4,4′‐bpy–Cu–4,4′‐bpy–Cu– chains, which are mutually perpendicular and non‐intersecting, creates large channels running parallel to the c axis. Within these channels, the [Ni(CN)₄]²⁻ anions coordinate to successive Cu^II atoms, forming zigzag –Cu—N[triple‐bond]C—Ni—C[triple‐bond]N—Cu– chains. In this manner, a three‐dimensional framework structure is constructed. To the authors' knowledge, this arrangement has not been observed in any of the many copper(II)–4,4′‐bipyridine framework complexes synthesized to date. The coordination environment of the Cu^II atom is completed by two water molecules. The framework is further strengthened by O—H...N hydrogen bonds involving the water molecules and the symmetry‐equivalent nonbridging cyanide N atoms.     

Electrochemistry of a novel monoruthenated porphyrin and its interaction with DNA

Interactions of an anisomerous ruthenated porphyrin [Ru(MPyTPP)(bpy)₂Cl]⁺ (where bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, MPyTPP = 5-pyridyl-10,15,20-triphenyl porphyrin) with calf thymus DNA are studied using a tin-doped indium oxide (ITO) electrode. The Ru^III/II redox reaction for the complex exhibits a surface-controlled electron transfer process in buffer solutions. There exists an obvious interaction of the adsorbed [Ru(MPyTPP)(bpy)₂Cl]⁺ on an ITO electrode with DNA in the buffer solutions. The formal potential for [Ru(MPyTPP)(bpy)₂Cl]^2+/+ redox reaction is found to shift negatively in the presence of DNA compared with that in the absence of DNA. However, the current signals of [Ru(bpy)₃]^3+/2+ reaction exhibits a distinct catalytic enhancement to DNA, in contrast to the interactions of [Ru(MPyTPP)(bpy)₂Cl]⁺with DNA.     

Spectrocyclic Voltammetry of Ruthenium Purple Electrodeposited on a WO3/Tris(2,2′-bipyridine)-ruthenium(II)/Polymer Hybrid Film

Summary: Electrochemical reactions of Ruthenium purple, Feequation/tex2gif-stack-1.gif[Ru^II(CN)₆]₃ (RP; Fe^III-Ru^II) were studied using a spectrocyclic voltammetry (SCV) technique. The SCV measurement for an RP film coated on an ITO electrode showed a reversible redox between RP and Ruthenium white (RW; Fe^II-Ru^II) at 0.14 V vs saturated calomel reference electrode (SCE). An RP film was electrodeposited on a hybrid film of tungsten trioxide (WO₃)/tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) ([Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺; bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine)/poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS) (denoted as WRP film) from a colloidal solution containing 0.5 mM FeCl₃, 0.5 mM K₄[Ru(CN)₆] and 40 mM KCl using a potentiodynamic multi-sweep technique. In a cyclic voltammogram (CV) of a WRP/RP film, a redox response was observed at 0.61 V in addition to essential redox responses of WRP hybrid film (a [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺/[Ru(bpy)₃]³⁺ redox at 1.03 V and a H_xWO₃/WO₃ redox below 0.09 V), but a redox response of RW/RP was not observed at 0.14 V. The SCV measurement for the WRP/RP film suggested that the redox response at 0.61 V is attributed to a redox of [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺/[Ru(bpy)₃]³⁺ interacted electrostatically with RP. It also showed that RW is oxidized to RP via [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺/[Ru(bpy)₃]³⁺ redox and RP is reversibly reduced to RW via H_xWO₃/WO₃ redox. This unique geared electrochemical reaction for the WRP/RP film leads to a hysteresis property of an RW/RP redox.     

Ligand Substitution Reactions on Aquapentachloro‐ and Hexachloroplatinic Acid — Synthesis and Characterization of Tetrachloroplatinum(IV) Complexes with Heterocyclic N,N Donors

Reactions of aquapentachloroplatinic acid, (H₃O)[PtCl₅(H₂O)]·2(18C6)·6H₂O ( 1 ) (18C6 = 18‐crown‐6), and H₂[PtCl₆]·6H₂O ( 2 ) with heterocyclic N, N donors (2, 2′‐bipyridine, bpy; 4, 4′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2, 2′‐bipyridine, tBu₂bpy; 1, 10‐phenanthroline, phen; 4, 7‐diphenyl‐1, 10‐phenanthroline, Ph₂phen; 2, 2′‐bipyrimidine, bpym) afforded with ligand substitution platinum(IV) complexes [PtCl₄(N∩N)] (N∩N = bpy, 3a ; tBu₂bpy, 3b ; Ph₂phen, 5 ; bpym, 7 ) and/or with protonation of N, N donor yielding (R₂phenH)₂[PtCl₆] (R = H, 4a ; Ph, 4b ) and (bpymH)⁺ ( 8 ). With UV irradiation Ph₂phen and bpym reacted with reduction yielding platinum(II) complexes [PtCl₂(N∩N)] (N∩N = Ph₂phen, 6 ; bpym, 9 ). Identities of all complexes were established by microanalysis as well as by NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁹⁵Pt) and IR spectroscopic investigations. Molecular structures of [PtCl₄(bpym)]·MeOH ( 7 ) and [PtCl₂(Ph₂phen)] ( 6 ) were determined by X‐ray diffraction analyses. Differences in reactivity of bpy/bpym and phen ligands are discussed in terms of calculated structures of complexes [PtCl₅(N∩N)]^— with monodentately bound N, N ligands (N∩N = bpy, 10a ; phen, 10b ; bpym, 10c ).     

Stereospecific synthesis and redox properties of ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes bearing a redox-active 1,8-naphthyridine unit

Two stereoisomers of cis-[Ru(bpy)(pynp)(CO)Cl]PF₆ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, pynp = 2-(2-pyridyl)-1,8-naphthyridine) were selectively prepared. The pyridyl rings of the pynp ligand in [Ru(bpy)(pynp)(CO)Cl]⁺ are situated trans and cis, respectively, to the CO ligand. The corresponding CH₃CN complex ([Ru(bpy)(pynp)(CO)(CH₃CN)]²⁺) was also prepared by replacement reactions of the chlorido ligand in CH₃CN. Using these complexes, ligand-centered redox behavior was studied by electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical techniques. The molecular structures of pynp-containing complexes (two stereoisomers of [Ru(bpy)(pynp)(CO)Cl]PF₆ and [Ru(pynp)₂(CO)Cl]PF₆) were determined by X-ray structure analyses.     

Electropolymerization of [Ru(bpy)(CO)2Cl2] (bpy=2,2′-bipyridine: a revisited trans versus cis(Cl) isomeric influence study

The mono-bipyridine bis carbonyl complex [Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂] exists in two stereoisomeric forms having a trans(Cl)/cis(CO) (1) and cis(Cl)/cis(CO) (2) configuration. In previous work we reported that only the trans(Cl)/cis(CO) isomer 1 leads by a two-electron reduction to the formation of [Ru(bpy)(CO)₂]_n polymeric film on an electrode surface. This initial statement was overstated, as both isomers allowed the build up of polymers. A detailed comparison of the electropolymerization of both isomers is reported here, as well as the reduction into dimers of parent stereoisomer [Ru(bpy)(CO)₂(C(O)OMe)Cl] complexes 3 and 4 obtained as side products during the synthesis of 1 and 2.     

Isolation of Bis- and Mono-Cyclometallated Ru−IMes Complexes upon Reaction of [Ru(PPh3)3HCl], IMes and ZnMe2

Addition of an excess of ZnMe₂ to a mixture of [Ru(PPh₃)₃HCl] and IMes (IMes=1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)imidazolin-2-ylidene) yields the bis-cyclometallated complex, [Ru(IMes)“(PPh₃)₂] 2 , together with the mono-cyclometallated, Ru−Zn heterobimetallic complex [Ru(IMes)′(PPh₃)₂(ZnMe)] 3 . Treatment of 2 with H₂, PhSiH₃ or pinacolborane yields the previously reported complex, [Ru(IMes)′(PPh₃)₂H] 1 , the synthesis of which has been reinvestigated. Further studies of small molecule reactivity show that 1 adds H₂ to give [Ru(IMes)(PPh₃)₂H₄] 4 , whilst 2 reacts with catecholborane to give [Ru(IMes-Bcat)′(PPh₃)₂H] 5 , in which (IMes-Bcat)′ signifies a borylated NHC ligand that is singly-metallated onto Ru. Treatment of 2 with CO gives the 18-electron dicarbonyl product [Ru(IMes)”(PPh₃)(CO)₂] 6 . Compounds 1 – 3 , 5 and 6 have been structurally characterised.     

Ruthenium(II)‐Komplexe mit orthometallierten O'Donnell Schiffbasen (Diphenylmethylenglycinester) [1]

Ruthenium(II) Complexes of Orthometallated O'Donnell Schiff Bases (Diphenylmethylene Glycine Esters) [1] The reaction of diphenyl methylene glycine esters with [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] gives the orthometallated complexes [Ru(PPh₃)₂(Cl){(C₆H₄)(C₆H₅)C=NCH₂CO₂R}] (R = H, Et, CMe₃) in which the ester group is coordinated to the ruthenium atom and which were characterized by IR, NMR, MS data and by cyclovoltammetry.