Miniaturised pressurised liquid extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil and sediment with subsequent large-volume injection-gas chromatography

Analyte extraction is the main limitation when developing at-line, or on-line, procedures for the preparation of (semi)solid environmental samples. Pressurised liquid extraction (PLE) is an analyte- and matrix-independent technique which provides cleaner extracts than the time-consuming classical procedures. In the study, the practicality of miniaturised PLE performed in a stainless-steel cell, and combined with subsequent large-volume injection (LVI)-GC-MS was studied. As an example, the new system was applied to the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils and a sediment. Variables affecting the PLE efficiency, such as pressure and temperature of the extraction solvent and total solvent volume, were studied. Toluene was selected as extraction solvent and a total solvent volume of 100 microl was used for the 10 min static-dynamic PLE of 50-mg samples. Additional clean-up or filtration of the sample extracts was not required. Detection limits using LVI-GC-MS were below 9 ng/g soil for the 13 PAHs more volatile than indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene in real soil samples and the repeatability of the complete PLE plus LVI-GC-MS method for the analysis of the endogenous PAH was better than 15%. Comparison of PLE and Soxhlet or liquid-partitioning extraction results for the analysis of non-spiked samples showed that the efficiency of PLE is the same or better than for the other two extraction methods assayed.     

Miniaturised sample preparation of fatty foodstuffs for the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls

A miniaturised analytical method allowing the exhaustive extraction of environmentally relevant polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from fatty foodstuffs and the purification of the extracts in a single step has been developed. After dispersion of the freeze dried sample on silica modified with 44% (w/w) of sulphuric acid, the mixture was packed in a glass column on top of a multilayer silica column used for removal of the lipids and biogenic co-extracted material. Using this arrangement, a complete sample preparation can be accomplished by two successive 10 min static extractions with hexane followed by a brief dynamic step to ensure purging of the sample and sorbents. The analytical method showed a satisfactory performance, with recoveries of the endogenous PCBs studied in the 81-134% range of those found using a more conventional off-line procedure, even though as small an amount of sample as 0.1 g was used. Detection limits by gas chromatography with micro-electron capture detection (GC-ECD) were in all cases lower than 0.3 ng/g sample (freeze dried basis) and the repeatability of the complete analytical procedure better than 14% (except for PCB 167). When combined with GC and ion trap detection in the tandem mass spectrometry mode, the miniaturised method has been proved to be a valuable alternative to the more expensive high resolution mass spectrometry for fast screening of PCBs 77, 126, and 169, even if these congeners were not isolated from the bulk of PCBs.     

Pressurized liquid extraction in determination of polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides in fish samples

Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) is a relatively new technique applicable for the extraction of persistent organic pollutants from various matrices. The main advantages of this method are short time and low consumption of extraction solvent. The effects of various operational parameters (i.e. temperature of extraction, number of static cycles and extraction solvent mixtures) on the PLE efficiency were investigated in this study. Fish muscle tissue containing 3.2% (w/w) lipids and native polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and other related compounds was used for testing. Purification of crude extracts was carried out by gel permeation chromatography employing Bio-Beads S-X3. Identification and quantitation of target indicator PCBs and OCPs was performed by high-resolution gas chromatography (HRGC) with two parallel electron-capture detectors (ECDs). Results obtained by the optimized PLE procedure were compared with conventional Soxhlet extraction (the same extraction solvent mixtures hexane–dichloromethane (1:1 v/v) and hexane–acetone (4:1 v/v) were used). The recoveries obtained by PLE operated at 90–120 °C were either comparable to “classic” Soxhlet extraction (for higher-chlorinated PCB congeners and DDT group) or even better (for lower chlorinated analytes). The highest recoveries were obtained for three static 5 min extraction cycles.     

Fast miniaturised sample preparation for the screening and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatographic determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in sludge

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in sludge are usually extracted by a technique such as Soxhlet with subsequent fractionation prior to long GC runs using GC-ECD or GC-HRMS. In this study, the extraction of selected chlorinated biphenyls (CBs) from a spiked sludge sample by three rapid techniques, i.e. ultrasonic (USE), pressurised-liquid (PLE), and microwave-assisted (MAE) extraction using a domestic microwave, was studied, with subsequent direct GC-ECD, GC-MS, or GC x GC-microECD analysis of the extracts. The main goal was to select an appropriate, and miniaturised, extraction method after only a brief optimisation and demonstrate the power of GC x GC analysis of dirty extracts. For PLE similar CB recoveries were found when extracting with either n-hexane or n-hexane/acetone (1/1). For USE and MAE, n-hexane/acetone (1/1) was the preferred extraction solvent. USE gave the best recoveries (80-95%; except 130% for CB 105). The only clean-up needed prior to GC-MS or GC x GC-gECD analysis was the removal of sulphur-containing compounds. GC-ECD was not suitable for these dirty extracts. The lowest LODs for the CBs (20 fg or 0.1 ng/g sludge) were found when combining USE and GC x GC-microECD, because of the powerful extraction, high separation power and excellent detectability provided by this technique.     

Determination of selected polychlorinated biphenyls in soil by miniaturised ultrasonic solvent extraction and gas chromatography-mass-selective detection

Miniaturised ultrasonic solvent extraction procedure was developed for the determination of selected polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in soil samples by gas chromatography-mass-selective detection by using 2³ factorial experimental design. Recoveries of PCBs from fortified soil samples are over 90% for three different fortification levels between 40 and 120 μg kg⁻¹, and relative standard deviations of the recoveries are below 7%. The limits of detection (LODs) ranged from 0.003 to 0.006 μg kg⁻¹. The performance of the proposed method was compared to traditional shake flask extraction method on the spiked real soil sample and extraction methods showed comparable efficiencies. Proposed miniaturised ultrasonic solvent extraction offers several advantages, i.e., reducing sample requirement for measurement of target compound, less solvent consumption and reducing the costs associated with solvent purchase and waste disposal.     

Analyses of polychlorinated biphenyls in waters and wastewaters using vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

A method was developed for viable and rapid determination of seven polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in water samples with vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction (VALLME) using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). At first, the most suitable extraction solvent and extraction solvent volume were determined. Later, the parameters affecting the extraction efficiency such as vortex extraction time, rotational speed of the vortex, and ionic strength of the sample were optimized by using a 2(3) factorial experimental design. The optimized extraction conditions for 5 mL water sample were as follows: extractant solvent 200 μL of chloroform; vortex extraction time of 2 min at 3000 rpm; centrifugation 5 min at 4000 rpm, and no ionic strength. Under the optimum condition, limits of detection (LOD) ranged from 0.36 to 0.73 ng/L. Mean recoveries of PCBs from fortified water samples are 96% for three different fortification levels and RSDs of the recoveries are below 5%. The developed procedure was successfully applied to the determination of PCBs in real water and wastewater samples such as tap, well, surface, bottled waters, and municipal, treated municipal, and industrial wastewaters. The performance of the proposed method was compared with traditional liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) of real water samples and the results show that efficiency of proposed method is comparable to the LLE. However, the proposed method offers several advantages, i.e. reducing sample requirement for measurement of target compounds, less solvent consumption, and reducing the costs associated with solvent purchase and waste disposal. It is also viable, rapid, and easy to use for the analyses of PCBs in water samples by using GC-MS.     

Selective pressurized liquid extraction of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls from food and feed samples

Selective pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (dl-PCBs) from various food and feed samples was performed with a selective PLE method previously developed for bulk PCBs. The method utilizes sulfuric acid impregnated silica inside the extraction cell to oxidize coextracted fat. Extractions were performed at 100 degrees C with n-heptane for 5 min in two cycles. Data obtained by selective PLE combined with gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS) were compared to concentrations derived from reference laboratories applying conventional sample preparation and GC-HRMS. Experiments performed on spiked vegetable oil, naturally contaminated crude fish oil and oil containing compound feed samples showed good results for these relatively simple matrices. The accuracy was generally +/-20% as compared to spiked levels or to values obtained by the reference laboratories. The precision, measured as the relative standard deviation (RSD) for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin toxic equivalency values (TEQs), was below 10% in all cases. The method was also tested on naturally contaminated herring tissue, chicken tissue, pork tissue and sepiolitic clay, which all caused some trouble. It was observed that sufficient amounts of sodium sulfate should be used for dehydration of tissue samples and additionally, the cells should not be packed too dense in order to avoid suppressed extraction efficiency. Once this was attended to, satisfactory data could be obtained, except for sepiolithic clay. This study demonstrates that selective PLE can be applied with success to a number of food and feed matrices in analysis of PCDD/Fs and dl-PCBs. Since the fat removal step is on-line, the selective PLE method will reduce time and solvent consumption for sample preparation as compared to traditional clean-up.     

Extraction of rotenone from Derris elliptica and Derris malaccensis by pressurized liquid extraction compared with maceration

The extraction of active compounds from plants is one of the most critical steps in the commercial development of natural products for medicinal, herbicidal or pesticidal use. The focus of this study was to compare conventional maceration and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) techniques for the efficient extraction of rotenone from the stem and root of Derris elliptica Benth and Derris malaccensis Prain. The effects of experimental variables, such as solvent, temperature and pressure, on PLE efficiency have been studied. Chloroform was determined to be a good extraction solvent (rotenone content 40.6%, w/w) compared to commonly used solvent, 95% ethanol (rotenone content 15.0%, w/w). The optimal conditions for PLE were 50 degrees C and 2000 psi. PLE showed higher extraction efficiency (rotenone content 46.1%, w/w) as compared with conventional maceration method (rotenone content 40.6%, w/w). The order of rotenone content found in crude extract obtained by optimized method from the highest to the lowest was root (46.1%, w/w) and stem (9.4%, w/w) of D. elliptica and stem of D. malaccensis (5.2%, w/w), respectively. Moreover, the results from this study indicated that PLE was considerably less time and solvent consuming (30 min, 3 ml/g of dried sample) than the conventional maceration techniques (72 h, 10 ml/g of dried sample).     

Selective pressurized liquid extraction of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in fish

A fast and simple method for the analysis of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in fish samples was developed using a one-step extraction and clean-up by means of pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) combined with gas chromatography-ion trap tandem mass spectrometry (GC-ITMS-MS). The selective PLE method provided to obtain ready-to-analyse extracts without any additional clean-up step, using a sorbent as fat retainer inside the PLE cell. Several PLE operating conditions, such as solvent type, extraction temperature and time, number of cycles and type of fat retainer, were studied. Using Florisil as fat retainer, maximum recoveries of PBDEs (83-108%) with minimum presence of matrix-interfering compounds were obtained using a mixture of n-hexane:dichloromethane 90:10 (v/v) as solvent, an extraction temperature of 100 °C and a static extraction time of 5 min in combination with three static cycles. Quality parameters of the method were established using standards and fish samples. Limits of detection and quantification ranged from 10 to 34 pg g⁻¹ wet weight and between 34 and 68 pg g⁻¹ wet weight, respectively. In addition, good linearity (between 1 and 500 ng ml⁻¹) and high precision (RSD % < 15%) were achieved. The method was validated using the standard reference material SRM-1945 (whale blubber) and was then applied to the analysis of PBDEs in fish samples.     

Determination of endocrine-disrupting compounds in cereals by pressurized liquid extraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Study of background contamination

A sensitive method based on pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS) has been developed for the determination in cereal samples of seven endocrine-disrupting compounds: bisphenol A (BPA), 4-tert-butylbenzoic acid (BBA), 4-nonylphenol (NP), 4-tert-butylphenol (t-BP), 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP), 2,4,5-trichlorophenol (TCP) and pentachlorophenol (PCP). For the PLE procedure, methanol was selected as the extraction solvent. An experimental design approach was applied to optimize other PLE parameters. The recoveries achieved for the all seven compounds were in the 81-104% range, with relative standard deviations of 4-9%. An additional preconcentration step, based on solid-phase extraction (SPE), after the PLE step proved to be a successful way for obtaining a more sensitive method. The detection limits achieved in corn breakfast cereals were in the 0.003-0.013 microg g(-1) range, except for BPA, with a detection limit of 0.043 microg g(-1), for a sample size of 2.5 g. These values are similar to or even lower than currently legislated limits for pesticides in cereals and cereal-based foodstuffs. We also investigated possible contamination during the experimental process by the target compounds released from purified water, plastics, syringes, peristaltic pump tubes, glassware and other laboratory materials in contact with the samples along the analytical process.     

Extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from smoked fish using pressurized liquid extraction with integrated fat removal

Quantification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in smoked fish products often requires multiple clean-up steps to remove fat and other compounds that may interfere with the chemical analysis. We present a novel pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) method that integrates exhaustive extraction with fat retention in one single analytical step. The PLE parameters: type of fat retainer, flush volume, solvent composition, fat-to-fat retainer ratio (FFR), and the dimensions of the extraction cells were the most important factors for obtaining fat-free extracts with high recoveries of PAHs. A 100 mL extraction cell filled with 18 g activated silica gel, dichloromethane:hexane (15:85, v/v) as extraction solvent, FFR of 0.025 and 100% flush volume was the best analytical setup for integrated extraction and fat retention.The one-step procedure provided a more rapid and cost-efficient alternative with minimization of waste generation compared to the standard reference method that is based on a multi-step procedure. Furthermore, the analytical quality of the two methods are comparable, while the new integrated approach for extraction and cleanup is less prone to analytical errors (random and systematic) because of fewer analytical steps.     

Optimization of Soxtec Extraction for the Determination of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Mussel and Comparison with Soxhlet Extraction,Accelerated Solvent Extraction,and Microwave Assisted Extraction

An on-line Soxtec extraction and cleanup method is optimized for PCBs determination in mussel samples. Soxtec extraction conditions have been optimized using two factorial designs. Optimized extraction parameters were sample weight, anhydrous sodium sulfate weight, solvent volume, alumina weight, and boiling and rinsing times. The results suggest that all PCBs congeners extracted by Soxtec appeared statistically affected by solvent volume. Soxtec quantitative recoveries (8– ?115%) were achieved for all PCBs and method precision (RSD <12%) was satisfactory. The optimized method is compared with three different applied extraction methods, Soxhlet, accelerated solvent extraction, and microwave-assisted extraction. This latter presents the cleanup step on column or assisted by polypropylene membranes. The extraction effectiveness of the four different applied extraction methods for the determination of PCBs in mussel was similar.     

A Rapid Method for the Determination of Organochlorine, Pyrethroid Pesticides and Polychlorobiphenyls in Fatty Foods Using GC with Electron Capture Detection

A new, single-step extraction and purification method was developed for the separation of 26 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), three pyrethroid pesticides (PPs) and six polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from fatty foods of either animal or vegetable origin. The method includes homogenisation of extracted fat and diatomaceous earth. Separation was achieved using a mini Pasteur pipette where a matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction was carried out with only 5 mL of dimethyl sulphoxide as an eluting solvent. A Pasteur pipette was joined to a prepacked slurry filled Florisil column, water deactivated to 15% where a liquid–liquid extraction and adsorption chromatography successively took place. The elution of OCPs, PPs and PCBs was performed with n-hexane/diethyl ether. Recoveries for PCBs were from 81 to 86% and for OCPs 68 to 94%, except for β-HCH, which gave lower, more variable recoveries. Excellent recoveries were obtained for pyrethroid pesticides, mostly more than 80%. The method was applied to 509 fatty samples for monitoring of these compounds. GC, with two columns connected to two electron capture detectors (ECD), was used.     

Comparison of pressurized liquid extraction and microwave assisted extraction for the determination of organochlorine pesticides in vegetables

A method to determine organochlorine pesticides in horticultural samples (lettuce, tomato, spinach, potato, turnip leaf and green bean) using pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) is described and compared with microwave assisted extraction (MAE). Significant parameters affecting PLE procedure such as temperature, static extraction time and extraction solvent were optimised and discussed. Clean-up of extracts was performed by solid phase extraction (SPE) using a carbon cartridge as adsorbent. Pesticides were determined by gas chromatography and electron capture detection (GC-ECD). Analytical recoveries obtained were ca. 100% and the relative standard deviations were lower than 15% for most of the studied pesticides with the proposed methods in each analysed matrix.     

Miniaturised pressurised liquid extraction of chloroanilines from soil with subsequent analysis by large-volume injection-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

A number of chloroanilines were extracted from soil by means of miniaturised pressurised liquid extraction (PLE). The extraction procedure was optimised for both large-volume on-column (LV-OC) and programmed-temperature vaporisation (PTV) injections combined with GC-MS. Hexane was the only extraction solvent suited for LV-OC and hexane/acetone gave the best results when using a PTV. Overall, the hexane/acetone-plus-PTV procedure shows better results than the hexane-plus-LV-OC method in terms of analyte recovery (36-109% versus 5-87%), repeatability (8-13% versus 4-31%) and detection limits. Both approaches allow detection of the chloroanilines in complex soil samples down to the 5-50 ng/g range. However, the PTV-based procedure is superior as regards robustness: over one hundred samples can be analysed without any maintenance being required.     

Optimised accelerated solvent extraction of PCBs and PAHs from compost

This study is the first thorough method optimisation for accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from chemically dried compost. For PCBs, optimised solvent composition, temperature, pressure, number of static cycles, duration, and flush volume were as follows: toluene/acetone 1?:?3 (v/v), 120°C, 2000?psi, 3?×?5?min, and 50%, respectively. Limits of quantification and method precision were between 0.16 and 2.46?µg?kg^?1 dw and 6–17% respectively for individual PCBs. Absolute recoveries of isotope-labelled extraction standards used for each of the analytes ranged from 65 to 105% and relative recoveries were between 85 and 99%. The method proofed to be robust and was successfully applied to different compost samples.

The optimisation of PAHs extraction was performed and resulted in the following conditions: solvent: hexane/acetone 1/3 (v:v), temperature: 140°C, pressure: 1500?psi, extraction time: 3?×?5?min, and 50% flush volume. Limits of detection and method precision for individual PAHs were between 1.1 and 37.2?µg?kg^?1?dw and 12–34% respectively. Absolute and relative recoveries ranged from 24 to 68% and from 85 to 99%, respectively. Optimal extraction conditions for PAHs were more difficult to determine due to the inhomogeneous distribution of PAHs in samples. However, the method appeared to be feasible and suggestions for further improvements are presented.     

生物样品中多氯联苯的微波皂化萃取气相色谱法测定

以KOH－甲醇－正己烷为皂化萃取溶剂,利用微波皂化萃取－气相色谱法测定了生物样品中的多氯联苯（PCBs）,实现了在皂化的同时对待测物的萃取。方法的检出限为质量分数6.25×10     

金属-有机纳米管分散固相萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱高灵敏分析环境水样中痕量多氯联苯

采用含铅金属-有机纳米管为吸附剂,基于分散固相萃取和气相色谱-串联质谱建立了一种高灵敏分析环境水样中痕量多氯联苯的方法.采用正交设计响应面法对影响萃取效果的重要因素(如离子强度、萃取时间和吸附剂用量等)进行了优化.获得的最优条件为:离子强度4.92 %(w/V)NaCl,萃取时间4.5 min,正己烷为解吸剂,吸附剂用量62.5 mg.在优化条件下,方法的线性范围为2~1000 ng/L,检出限为0.26~0.82 ng/L. 日内和日间相对标准偏差分别为0.8%~5.5% (200 ng/L, n=6)和2.7%~7.4% (200 ng/L, n=6).将本方法应用于实际环境水样中多氯联苯的分析,回收率为78.9%~113.3%,结果满意.     

Pressurized Liquid Extraction Combined with Dispersive Liquid‐liquid Micro‐extraction as an Efficient Sample Preparation Method for Determination of Volatile Components in Tobacco

The pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) followed by dispersive liquid–liquid micro‐extraction (DLLME) has been developed for extraction of volatile components in tobacco. 35 volatile components were detected by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). Methanol–methyl tert‐butyl ether (MTBE) (8:2, v/v) was selected as PLE extraction solvent. The optimized DLLME procedure, 3 mL of pure water and 1.0 mL tobacco extract solution, 40 μL of chloroform as extraction solvent, 0.5 mL of acetonitrile as disperser solvent, was validated. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors were in the range of 96‐159. The limits of detection were between 0.14 and 0.33 μg/kg. The repeatability of the proposed method, expressed as relative standard deviation, varied between 4.3 and 7.5% (n = 6). The recoveries of the analytes evaluated by fortification of tobacco samples were in the range of 84.7‐96.4%. Compared with the conventional sample preparation method for determination of volatile components in tobacco, the proposed method was quick and easy to operate, and had high‐enrichment factors and low consumption of organic solvent.     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry determination of polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in milk

An effective multi‐residue pretreatment technique, solid‐phase extraction (SPE) combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME), was proposed for the trace analysis of 14 polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in milk samples using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). Interesting analytes in milk samples were extracted with hexane after protein precipitation. The hexane extracts were loaded on an LC‐Florisil column to isolate analytes from the milk matrix. The elutes were dried and dissolved in acetone, which was used as the disperser solvent in subsequent DLLME procedures. The effects of several important parameters on the extraction efficiency were evaluated. Under the optimized conditions, a linear relationship was obtained in the range of 0.02–10.00 μg/L (PCBs) and 0.5–100.00 μg/L (PBDEs). The LOD (S/N=3) and relative standard deviations (RSDs, n=5) for all analytes were 0.01–0.4 μg/L and 0.6–8.5%, respectively. The recoveries of the standards added to raw bovine milk samples were 74.0–131.8%, and the repeatabilities of the analysis results were 1.12–17.41%. This method has been successfully applied to estimating PCBs and PBDEs in milk samples.