Matching properties in connected domination critical graphs

A dominating set of vertices S of a graph G is connected if the subgraph G[S] is connected. Let γ_c(G) denote the size of any smallest connected dominating set in G. A graph G is k-γ-connected-critical if γ_c(G)=k, but if any edge is added to G, then γ_c(G+e)?k-1. This is a variation on the earlier concept of criticality of edge addition with respect to ordinary domination where a graph G was defined to be k-critical if the domination number of G is k, but if any edge is added to G, the domination number falls to k-1.A graph G is factor-critical if G-v has a perfect matching for every vertex v∈V(G), bicritical if G-u-v has a perfect matching for every pair of distinct vertices u,v∈V(G) or, more generally, k-factor-critical if, for every set S⊆V(G) with |S|=k, the graph G-S contains a perfect matching. In two previous papers [N. Ananchuen, M.D. Plummer, Matching properties in domination critical graphs, Discrete Math. 277 (2004) 1-13; N. Ananchuen, M.D. Plummer, 3-factor-criticality in domination critical graphs, Discrete Math. 2007, to appear [3].] on ordinary (i.e., not necessarily connected) domination, the first and third authors showed that under certain assumptions regarding connectivity and minimum degree, a critical graph G with (ordinary) domination number 3 will be factor-critical (if |V(G)| is odd), bicritical (if |V(G)| is even) or 3-factor-critical (again if |V(G)| is odd). Analogous theorems for connected domination are presented here. Although domination and connected domination are similar in some ways, we will point out some interesting differences between our new results for the case of connected domination and the results in [N. Ananchuen, M.D. Plummer, Matching properties in domination critical graphs, Discrete Math. 277 (2004) 1-13; N. Ananchuen, M.D. Plummer, 3-factor-criticality in domination critical graphs, Discrete Math. 2007, to appear [3].].     

On graphs for which the connected domination number is at most the total domination number

In this note, we give a finite forbidden subgraph characterization of the connected graphs for which any non-trivial connected induced subgraph has the property that the connected domination number is at most the total domination number. This question is motivated by the fact that any connected dominating set of size at least 2 is in particular a total dominating set. It turns out that in this characterization, the total domination number can equivalently be substituted by the upper total domination number, the paired-domination number and the upper paired-domination number, respectively. Another equivalent condition is given in terms of structural domination.     

On restricted domination in graphs

The k-restricted domination number of a graph G is the minimum number d _k such that for any subset U of k vertices of G, there is a dominating set in G including U and having at most d _k vertices. Some new upper bounds in terms of order and degrees for this number are found.      

On global domination critical graphs

A dominating set of a graph G=(V,E) is a subset S⊆V such that every vertex not in S is adjacent to at least one vertex of S. The domination number of G is the cardinality of a smallest dominating set. The global domination number, γ_g(G), is the cardinality of a smallest set S that is simultaneously a dominating set of both G and its complement . Graphs for which γ_g(G−e)>γ_g(G) for all edges e∈E are characterized, as are graphs for which γ_g(G−e)<γ_g(G) for all edges e∈E whenever is disconnected. Progress is reported in the latter case when is connected.     

On total restrained domination in graphs

In this paper we initiate the study of total restrained domination in graphs. Let G = (V,E) be a graph. A total restrained dominating set is a set S V where every vertex in V - S is adjacent to a vertex in S as well as to another vertex in V - S, and every vertex in S is adjacent to another vertex in S. The total restrained domination number of G, denoted by _r ^t (G), is the smallest cardinality of a total restrained dominating set of G. First, some exact values and sharp bounds for _r ^t (G) are given in Section 2. Then the Nordhaus-Gaddum-type results for total restrained domination number are established in Section 3. Finally, we show that the decision problem for _r ^t (G) is NP-complete even for bipartite and chordal graphs in Section 4.This work was supported by National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (19871036).     

On signed cycle domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph, a function f:E→{−1,1} is said to be an signed cycle dominating function (SCDF) of G if ∑_e∈E(C)f(e)≥1 holds for any induced cycle C of G. The signed cycle domination number of G is defined as is an SCDF of G}. In this paper, we obtain bounds on , characterize all connected graphs G with , and determine the exact value of for some special classes of graphs G. In addition, we pose some open problems and conjectures.     

On signed majority total domination in graphs

We initiate the study of signed majority total domination in graphs. Let G = (V, E) be a simple graph. For any real valued function f: V and S V, let . A signed majority total dominating function is a function f: V {–1, 1} such that f(N(v)) 1 for at least a half of the vertices v V. The signed majority total domination number of a graph G is = min{f(V): f is a signed majority total dominating function on G}. We research some properties of the signed majority total domination number of a graph G and obtain a few lower bounds of .This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China.     

On the 2-rainbow domination in graphs

The concept of 2-rainbow domination of a graph G coincides with the ordinary domination of the prism G□K₂. In this paper, we show that the problem of deciding if a graph has a 2-rainbow dominating function of a given weight is NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite graphs or chordal graphs. Exact values of 2-rainbow domination numbers of several classes of graphs are found, and it is shown that for the generalized Petersen graphs GP(n,k) this number is between ⌈4n/5⌉ and n with both bounds being sharp.     

On matching and total domination in graphs

A set M of edges of a graph G is a matching if no two edges in M are incident to the same vertex. A set S of vertices in G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The matching number is the maximum cardinality of a matching of G, while the total domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between the matching and total domination number of a graph. We observe that the total domination number of every claw-free graph with minimum degree at least three is bounded above by its matching number, and we show that every k-regular graph with k?3 has total domination number at most its matching number. In general, we show that no minimum degree is sufficient to guarantee that the matching number and total domination number are comparable.     

On edge domination numbers of graphs

Let and be the signed edge domination number and signed star domination number of G, respectively. We prove that holds for all graphs G without isolated vertices, where n=|V(G)|?4 and m=|E(G)|, and pose some problems and conjectures.     

On the balanced domination of graphs

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal - Let G = (VG,EG) be a graph and let NG[υ] denote the closed neighbourhood of a vertex υ in G. A function f: VG ? {?1,0,1} is said to be a...     

On spanning connected graphs

A k-containerC(u,v) of G between u and v is a set of k internally disjoint paths between u and v. A k-container C(u,v) of G is a k^*-container if the set of the vertices of all the paths in C(u,v) contains all the vertices of G. A graph G is k^*-connected if there exists a k^*-container between any two distinct vertices. Therefore, a graph is 1^*-connected (respectively, 2^*-connected) if and only if it is hamiltonian connected (respectively, hamiltonian). In this paper, a classical theorem of Ore, providing sufficient conditional for a graph to be hamiltonian (respectively, hamiltonian connected), is generalized to k^*-connected graphs.     

On path connected graphs

Given n and i, n > 2, 2 ≤ i ≤ n ? 1, the smallest size of an n-graph without endvertices is obtained, which ensures a path of length i between any two vertices of the graph.     

On graphs with equal total domination and Grundy total domination numbers

Aequationes mathematicae - A sequence $$(v_1,ldots ,v_k)$$ of vertices in a graph G without isolated vertices is called a total dominating sequence if every vertex $$v_i$$ in the sequence totally...     

On upper domination Ramsey numbers for graphs

The classical Ramsey number r(m,n) can be defined as the smallest integer p such that in every two-coloring (R,B) of the edges of K_p, β(B)⩾m or β(R)⩾n, where β(G) denotes the independence number of a graph G. We define the upper domination Ramsey number u(m,n) as the smallest integer p such that in every two-coloring (R,B) of the edges of K_p, Γ(B)⩾m or Γ(R)⩾n, where Γ(G) is the maximum cardinality of a minimal dominating set of a graph G. The mixed domination Ramsey number v(m,n) is defined to be the smallest integer p such that in every two-coloring (R,B) of the edges of K_p, Γ(B)⩾m or β(R)⩾n. Since β(G)⩽Γ(G) for every graph G, u(m,n)⩽v(m,n)⩽r(m,n). We develop techniques to obtain upper bounds for upper domination Ramsey numbers of the form u(3,n) and mixed domination Ramsey numbers of the form v(3,n). We show that u(3,3)=v(3,3)=6, u(3,4)=8, v(3,4)=9, u(3,5)=v(3,5)=12 and u(3,6)=v(3,6)=15.     

On the total domination subdivision numbers in graphs

A set S of vertices of a graph G = (V, E) without isolated vertex is a total dominating set if every vertex of V(G) is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination number γ _t (G) is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. The total domination subdivision number sd_γt (G) is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the total domination number. Karami, Khoeilar, Sheikholeslami and Khodkar, (Graphs and Combinatorics, 2009, 25, 727–733) proved that for any connected graph G of order n ≥ 3, sd_{γ t} (G) ≤ 2γ _t (G) − 1 and posed the following problem: Characterize the graphs that achieve the aforementioned upper bound. In this paper we first prove that sd_{γ t} (G) ≤ 2α′(G) for every connected graph G of order n ≥ 3 and δ(G) ≥ 2 where α′(G) is the maximum number of edges in a matching in G and then we characterize all connected graphs G with sd_{γ t} (G)=2γ _t (G)−1.