Aurivillius Phases in the Bi4Ti3O12/BiFeO3 System: Thermal Behaviour and Crystal Structure

Four compounds of the Bi₄Ti₃O₁₂/BiFeO₃ system with the formula Bi₂Bi_n?1(Ti,Fe)_nO_3n+3, n = 3, 4, 4.5 and 6 were studied using high‐temperature X‐ray powder diffraction and differential thermoanalysis methods. The crystal structure of the n = 6 phase was refined by the Rietveld method. An unusual behaviour of thermal expansion attributed to an orthorhombic‐to‐tetragonal transformation was revealed. For all the compounds, the lattice parameter c vs temperature T dependence has three regions in the range of T = 20 –750 °C interpreted as (1) expansion of the initial orthorhombic phase, (2) a pronounced structure reconstruction to the tetragonal phase, (3) an expansion of the tetragonal phase. The crystal structure of Bi₇Ti₃Fe₃O₂₁ based on 6‐layer‐perovskite blocks is proposed from X‐ray powder diffraction data. The Rietveld refinement of the structure in the orthorhombic space group F2mm with lattice parameters a = 5.4699(3), b = 5.4924(3), c = 57.551(3) Å (R_p = 9.4, R_wp = 11.9, R_exp = 4.7, R_B = 4.4 %) shows that a distorted 6‐layer model fits the data of Bi₇Ti₃Fe₃O₂₁.     

Complex Borides RERu4B4 (RE = Ce,Pr, Nd,Sm) – Bonding Peculiarities and Magnetic Properties

The rare earth borides RERu₄B₄ (RE = Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm) were synthesized from the elements by arc‐melting and their crystal structures were studied on the basis of X‐ray powder and single‐crystal diffraction: LuRu₄B₄ type, I4₁/acd, a = 747.47(8), c = 1506.4(3) pm, wR₂ = 0.0579, 362 F² values for CeRu₄B₄, a = 751.3(2), c = 1507.1(5) pm, wR₂ = 0.0724, 471 F² values for PrRu₄B₄, a = 751.0(2), c = 1506.9(6) pm, wR₂ = 0.0598, 384 F² values for NdRu₄B₄, and a = 749.1(1), c = 1506.0(3) pm, wR₂ = 0.0759, 413 F² values for SmRu₄B₄, with 18 variables per refinement. Striking structural motifs of the RERu₄B₄ structures are Ru₄ tetrahedra and B₂ dumbbells with Ru–Ru and B–B distances of 271 and 180 pm in CeRu₄B₄. The intermediate valence of cerium leads to shorter Ce–Ru distances of 292 pm. CeRu₄B₄ behaves like a Pauli paramagnet with a small room temperature susceptibility of 1.5 × 10^–4 emu · mol^–1. Chemical bonding analyses shows substantial Ru–B and B–B bonding within the [Ru₄B₄] substructure.     

The crystal and magnetic structures of Ca2NdRuO6, Ca2HoRuO6, and Sr2ErRuO6

The crystal structure of Sr₂ErRuO₆ has been refined from neutron powder diffraction data collected at room temperature; space group P2₁/n, A = 5.7626(2), B = 5.7681(2), C = 8.1489(2) Å, β = 90.19(1)°. The structure is that of a distorted perovskite with a 1:1 ordered arrangement of Ru⁵⁺ and Er³⁺ over the 6-coordinate sites. Data collected at 4.2 K show the presence of long range antiferromagnetic order involving both Ru⁵⁺ and Er³⁺. The temperature dependence of the sublattice magnetizations is described. The crystal structure of Ca₂NdRuO₆ is also that of a distored perovskite (P2₁/n, A = 5.5564(1), B = 5.8296(1), C = 8.0085(1) β = 90.19(1)°. The β = 90.07(1)°) with a random distribution of Ca²⁺ and Nd³⁺ on the A site and a 1:1 ordered arrangement of Ca²⁺ and Ru⁵⁺ on the 6-coordinate B sites. The Ru⁵⁺ sublattice is antiferromagnetic at 4.2 K but there is no evidence for magnetic ordering of the Nd³⁺ ions. Ca₂HoRuO₆ is also a distorted perovskite (P2₁/n, A = 5.4991(1), B = 5.7725(1), C = 7.9381(2), β = 90.18(1)° at 4.2 K) with a cation distribution best represented as Ca_1.46Ho_0.54[Ca_0.54Ho_0.46Ru]O₆. There is no ordering among the Ca³⁺ or Ho³⁺ ions on either the A or the B sites, but the Ca/Ho ions form a 1:1 ordered arrangement with Ru⁵⁺ on the B sites. At 4.2 K the Ru⁵⁺ ions adopt a Type I antiferromagnetic arrangement but there is no evidence of long range magnetic ordering among the Ho³⁺ ions.     

CsTi2Cl7‐II: Synthese,Kristallstruktur und magnetische Eigenschaften

CsTi₂Cl₇‐II: Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Magnetic Properties Single crystals of a second modification of CsTi₂Cl₇ (II) were obtained from the reaction of CsCl with TiCl₂ and C₆Cl₆ (monoclinic, P2₁/m (No. 11), Z = 2, a = 635.4(3), b = 1163.0(2), c = 728.0(2) pm, β = 91.49(4)°). X‐ray pure powder samples are obtained from the binary components in 1 : 2 molar mixtures of CsCl and TiCl₃ (melting at 900 °C and annealing at 550 °C below the melting point). The crystal structure of CsTi₂Cl₇‐II contains layers of densest packings of spheres of the compositions CsCl₃ and Cl₄, respectively, that are stacked alternatively in the [010] direction according to the sequence … ABAC … Ti³⁺ resides in one quarter of the octahedral holes between these layers in a way that confacial bioctahedra are connected via two common edges forming a zigzag chain running parallel to [010]. This structure with Ti³⁺–Ti³⁺ distances of 323 and 347 pm, respectively, is reflected in the antiferromagnetic behavior with interactions about sixteen times stronger within the dimers than between them (J = –490 cm^–1 bzw. J = –30 cm^–1).     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Magnetic Properties of the New Boride Solid Solutions M0.5Ru6.5B3 (M = Cr,Mn, Co,Ni)

Powder samples and single crystals of the borides M_0.5Ru_6.5B₃ (M = Cr, Mn, Co, Ni) were synthesized by arc‐melting the elements in a water‐cooled copper crucible under argon. The new phases were structurally characterized by single‐crystal and powder X‐ray diffraction as well as EDX‐Analyses. They crystallize in the hexagonal Th₇Fe₃ structure type (space group P6₃mc, no. 186, Z = 2) and a pronounced site preferential M/Ru substitution is observed. Magnetic properties of the compounds were investigated and Pauli paramagnetism was observed in all cases. However, a strong temperature dependency is subsequently observed in Mn_0.5Ru_6.5B₃ below 250 K, but no hint of magnetic ordering was found.     

The Crystal Structure of Pb8FeIIFeF24: an ordered Fluorite-like Compound

Pb₈Fe^IIFeF₂₄ is triclinic: a = 20.118(3) Å, b = 5.597(1) Å, c = 9.440(2) Å, α = 89.75(2)°, β = 105.79(2)°, α = 89.38(2)°, Z = 2. The structure is solved in the unconventional space group C1 , from X-ray single crystal data using 1 641 independent reflections (R = 0.048, R_w = 0.051). It is built up from the stacking of two subnetworks along the a axis: fluorite-like [Pb₈F₁₀]_n⁶ⁿ⁺ layers and infinite dimetallic [Fe^IIFeF₁₄]_n^6n? double-chains of corner-sharing octahedra running along the b axis.     

The Versatile Coordination Modes of Monophosphine‐o‐Carborane in the Formation of Iridium and Rhodium Complexes: Synthesis,Reactivity, and Characterization

Monophosphine‐o‐carborane has four competitive coordination modes when it coordinates to metal centers. To explore the structural transitions driven by these competitive coordination modes, a series of monophosphine‐o‐carborane Ir,Rh complexes were synthesized and characterized. [Cp*M(Cl)₂{1‐(PPh₂)‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₁}] (M=Ir ( 1 a ), Rh ( 1 b ); Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅), [Cp*Ir(H){7‐(PPh₂)‐7,8‐C₂B₉H₁₁}] ( 2 a ), and [1‐(PPh₂)‐3‐(η⁵‐Cp*)‐3,1,2‐MC₂B₉H₁₀] (M=Ir ( 3 a ), Rh ( 3 b )) can be all prepared directly by the reaction of 1‐(PPh₂)‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₁ with dimeric complexes [(Cp*MCl₂)₂] (M=Ir, Rh) under different conditions. Compound 3 b was treated with AgOTf (OTf=CF₃SO₃^?) to afford the tetranuclear metallacarborane [Ag₂(thf)₂(OTf)₂{1‐(PPh₂)‐3‐(η⁵‐Cp*)‐3,1,2‐RhC₂B₉H₁₀}₂] ( 4 b ). The arylphosphine group in 3 a and 3 b was functionalized by elemental sulfur (1 equiv) in the presence of Et₃N to afford [1‐{(S)PPh₂}‐3‐(η⁵‐Cp*)‐3,1,2‐MC₂B₉H₁₀] (M=Ir ( 5 a ), Rh ( 5 b )). Additionally, the 1‐(PPh₂)‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₁ ligand was functionalized by elemental sulfur (2 equiv) and then treated with [(Cp*IrCl₂)₂], thus resulting in two 16‐electron complexes [Cp*Ir(7‐{(S)PPh₂}‐8‐S‐7,8‐C₂B₉H₉)] ( 6 a ) and [Cp*Ir(7‐{(S)PPh₂}‐8‐S‐9‐OCH₃‐7,8‐C₂B₉H₉)] ( 7 a ). Compound 6 a further reacted with nBuPPh₂, thereby leading to 18‐electron complex [Cp*Ir(nBuPPh₂)(7‐{(S)PPh₂}‐8‐S‐7,8‐C₂B₉H₁₀)] ( 8 a ). The influences of other factors on structural transitions or the formation of targeted compounds, including reaction temperature and solvent, were also explored.     

New Transition‐Metal Borides containing Trigonal‐Planar B4‐Units: Syntheses and Single‐Crystal Structure Analyses of Ti1.6Os2.4B2 and Ti1–xFexOs2RhB2 (0 < x < 0.5)

Single crystals of Ti_1.6Os_2.4B₂ and the solid solution Ti_1–xFe_xOs₂RhB₂ (0 < x < 0.5) were synthesized by arc‐melting the elements in a water‐cooled copper crucible under an argon atmosphere. The new silver‐like phases, structurally characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray and EDX analyses, crystallize in the hexagonal Ti_1.6Os_1.4RuB₂ structure type (space group (Nr. 189), Z = 3) and contain trigonal‐planar B₄‐units and one‐dimensional chains of titanium or mixed titanium/iron atoms, respectively.     

Structural Diversity and Magnetic Properties of Hybrid Ruthenium Halide Perovskites and Related Compounds

There has been a great deal of recent interest in extended compounds containing Ru³⁺ and Ru⁴⁺ in light of their range of unusual physical properties. Many of these properties are displayed in compounds with the perovskite and related structures. Here we report an array of structurally diverse hybrid ruthenium halide perovskites and related compounds: MA₂RuX₆ (X=Cl or Br), MA₂MRuX₆ (M=Na, K or Ag; X=Cl or Br) and MA₃Ru₂X₉ (X=Br) based upon the use of methylammonium (MA=CH₃NH₃⁺) on the perovskite A site. The compounds MA₂RuX₆ with Ru⁴⁺ crystallize in the trigonal space group and can be described as vacancy‐ordered double‐perovskites. The ordered compounds MA₂MRuX₆ with M⁺ and Ru³⁺ crystallize in a structure related to BaNiO₃ with alternating MX₆ and RuX₆ face‐shared octahedra forming linear chains in the trigonal space group. The compound MA₃Ru₂Br₉ crystallizes in the orthorhombic Cmcm space group and displays pairs of face‐sharing octahedra forming isolated Ru₂Br₉ moieties with very short Ru–Ru contacts of 2.789 Å. The structural details, including the role of hydrogen bonding and dimensionality, as well as the optical and magnetic properties of these compounds are described. The magnetic behavior of all three classes of compounds is influenced by spin–orbit coupling and their temperature‐dependent behavior has been compared with the predictions of the appropriate Kotani models.     

One‐Dimensional Ferromagnetically Coupled Bimetallic Chains Constructed with trans‐[Ru(acac)2(CN)2]−: Syntheses,Structures, Magnetic Properties,and Density Functional Theoretical Study

Four cyano‐bridged 1D bimetallic polymers have been prepared by using the paramagnetic building block trans‐[Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂]^? (Hacac=acetylacetone): {[{Ni(tren)}{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}][ClO₄]?CH₃OH}_n ( 1 ) (tren=tris(2‐aminoethyl)amine), {[{Ni(cyclen)}{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}][ClO₄]? CH₃OH}_n ( 2 ) (cyclen=1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane), {[{Fe(salen)}{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}]}_n ( 3 ) (salen^2?=N,N′‐bis(salicylidene)‐o‐ethyldiamine dianion) and [{Mn(5,5′‐Me₂salen)}₂{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}][Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂]? 2 CH₃OH ( 4 ) (5,5′‐Me₂salen=N,N′‐bis(5,5′‐dimethylsalicylidene)‐o‐ethylenediimine). Compounds 1 and 2 are 1D, zigzagged NiRu chains that exhibit ferromagnetic coupling between Ni^II and Ru^III ions through cyano bridges with J=+1.92 cm^?1, z J′=?1.37 cm^?1, g=2.20 for 1 and J=+0.85 cm^?1, z J′=?0.16 cm^?1, g=2.24 for 2 . Compound 3 has a 1D linear chain structure that exhibits intrachain ferromagnetic coupling (J=+0.62 cm^?1, z J′=?0.09 cm^?1, g=2.08), but antiferromagnetic coupling occurs between FeRu chains, leading to metamagnetic behavior with T_N=2.6 K. In compound 4 , two Mn^III ions are coordinated to trans‐[Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂]^? to form trinuclear Mn₂Ru units, which are linked together by π–π stacking and weak Mn???O* interactions to form a 1D chain. Compound 4 shows slow magnetic relaxation below 3.0 K with ?=0.25, characteristic of superparamagnetic behavior. The Mn^III???Ru^III coupling constant (through cyano bridges) and the Mn^III???Mn^III coupling constant (between the trimers) are +0.87 and +0.24 cm^?1, respectively. Compound 4 is a novel single‐chain magnet built from Mn₂Ru trimers through noncovalent interactions. Density functional theory (DFT) combined with the broken symmetry state method was used to calculate the molecular magnetic orbitals and the magnetic exchange interactions between Ru^III and M (M=Ni^II, Fe^III, and Mn^III) ions. To explain the somewhat unexpected ferromagnetic coupling between low‐spin Ru^III and high‐spin Fe^III and Mn^III ions in compounds 3 and 4 , respectively, it is proposed that apart from the relative symmetries, the relative energies of the magnetic orbitals may also be important in determining the overall magnetic coupling in these bimetallic assemblies.     

Cluster chemistry: XXXV. Reactions of some ruthenium cluster complexes with hydrogen: Cleavage of element-carbon bonds

Hydrogenation (20 atm, 80°C, 2 h) of trinuclear Ru₃(CO)_12-nL_n (L= tertiary phosphine or phosphite; n = 1–3) resulted in aggregation to give mixtures of H₄Ru₄(CO)12-n(L)_n (n = 0–4), but Ru₃(CO)₁₀(L-L) (L-L=dppm, dpam) gave Ru₃(μ-H)(μ₃-PhECH₂EPh₂)(CO)₉ (E = P, As, respectively) and Ru₃(μ-H)₂(μ₃-PPh)(CO)₈(PMePh₂), and Ru₃(μ-H)(μ₃-SBu^t)(CO)₉ gave Ru₃(μ-H)₂(μ₃-S)(CO)₉ by cleavage of PC, AsC, or SC bonds. Both types of reaction occurred with Ru₃(CO)₁₀(dppe) and [Ru₃(CO)₁₁]₂(μ-dppe).     

A Large Family of Iron Ruddlesden‐Popper Relatives: from Oxides to Oxycarbonates and Oxyhydroxides

Iron oxides, oxyhydroxydes and oxycarbonates derived from the layered Ruddlesden‐Popper (RP) structure form a large family of layered compounds. Besides the classical RP oxides Sr_n+1Fe_nO_3n+1, single intergrowths with the generic formulation (A,Sr)_n+2Fe_nO_3n+2 and (A,Sr)_n+3Fe_nO_3n+3 (A = Tl, Pb, Bi…) can be generated by increasing the multiplicity of the rock salt layers, and multiple intergrowths of these single intergrowths can be synthesized. Starting from oxygen deficient RP oxides such as n = 3 member Sr₃NdFe₃O_9?δ, oxyhydroxydes hydrates and oxyhydroxydes such as Sr₃NdFe₃O_7.5(OH)₂·H₂O and Sr₃NdFe₃O_7.5(OH)₂ can be created topotactically. Carbonate groups can also replace FeO₆ octahedra in the n = 3 member Sr₄Fe₃O₁₀, leading to layered oxycarbonates Sr₄Fe_3?x(CO₃)_xO_10?4x with 0 < × ≤ 1. Shearing mechanism applied transversally to the layers allows collapsed structures to be generated such as the [Bi₂Sr₃Fe₂O₉]_n [Bi₄Sr₆Fe₂O₁₆] family and the ferrite Bi₁₃Ba₂Sr₂₅Fe₁₃O₆₆. Finally the replacement of rock salt SrO layers in the intergrowth Sr₂FeO₄ allows a new series of modulated structures [Sr₈Fe₁₂O₂₆]·[Sr₃Fe₂O₆]_n to be generated, built up of layers of FeO₅ bipyramids and tetragonal pyramids intergrown with perovskite layers.     

Bridging gold: B‐Au‐B three‐center‐two‐electron bonds in electron‐deficient B2Aun−/0 (n = 1, 3, 5) and mixed analogues

A systematic density functional theory and wave function theory investigation on the geometrical and electronic structures of the electron‐deficient diboron aurides B₂Au (n = 1, 3, 5) and their mixed analogues B₂H_mAu (m + n = 3, 5) has been performed in this work. Ab initio theoretical evidences strongly suggest that bridging gold atoms exist in the ground states of C_2v B₂Au^?(¹A₁), C₂ B₂Au(¹A), C_2v B₂Au₃(²B₁), C_2v B₂Au(¹A₁), and C_s B₂Au₅(²A″), which all prove to possess a B? Au? B three‐center‐two‐electron (3c‐2e) bond. For B₂H_mAu (m + n = 3, 5) mixed anions, bridging B? Au? B units appear to be favored in energy over bridging B? H? B, as demonstrated by the fact that the Au‐bridged C_2v B₂H₂Au^? (¹A₁), C_s B₂HAu (¹A′), and C₁ B₂HAu (¹A) lie clearly lower than their H‐bridged counterparts C_s B₂H₂Au^? (¹A′), C₂ B₂HAu (¹A), and C_2v B₂HAu (¹A₁), respectively. Orbital analyses indicate that Au 6s makes about 92–96% contribution to the Au‐based orbitals in these B‐Au‐B 3c‐2e interactions, whereas Au 5d contributes 8–4%. The adiabatic and vertical detachment energies of the concerned anions have been calculated to facilitate their future experimental characterizations. The results obtained in this work establish an interesting 3c‐2e bonding model (B? Au? B) for electron‐deficient systems in which Au 6s plays a major role with non‐negligible contribution from Au 5d. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2011     

Controlling Metal–Ligand–Metal Oxidation State Combinations by Ancillary Ligand (L) Variation in the Redox Systems [L2Ru(μ‐boptz)RuL2]n,boptz=3,6‐bis(2‐oxidophenyl)‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine,and L=acetylacetonate, 2,2′‐bipyridine,or 2‐phenylazopyridine

The new compounds [(acac)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(acac)₂] ( 1 ), [(bpy)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 2 ‐(ClO₄)₂), and [(pap)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(pap)₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 3 ‐(ClO₄)₂) were obtained from 3,6‐bis(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine (H₂boptz), the crystal structure analysis of which is reported. Compound 1 contains two antiferromagnetically coupled (J=?36.7 cm^?1) Ru^III centers. We have investigated the role of both the donor and acceptor functions containing the boptz^2? bridging ligand in combination with the electronically different ancillary ligands (donating acac^?, moderately π‐accepting bpy, and strongly π‐accepting pap; acac=acetylacetonate, bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine pap=2‐phenylazopyridine) by using cyclic voltammetry, spectroelectrochemistry and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy for several in situ accessible redox states. We found that metal–ligand–metal oxidation state combinations remain invariant to ancillary ligand change in some instances; however, three isoelectronic paramagnetic cores Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru showed remarkable differences. The excellent tolerance of the bpy co ‐ ligand for both Ru^III and Ru^II is demonstrated by the adoption of the mixed ‐ valent form in [L₂Ru(μ‐boptz)RuL₂]³⁺, L=bpy, whereas the corresponding system with pap stabilizes the Ru^II states to yield a phenoxyl radical ligand and the compound with L=acac^? contains two Ru^III centers connected by a tetrazine radical‐anion bridge.     

Ternary Transition Metal Antimonides T5T' 1‐xSb2+x (T = Ti,Zr, Hf; T' = Fe,Co, Ni,Cu, Ru,Rh, Pd,Cd) with Nb5SiSn2 (Ordered W5Si3, Filled V4SiSb2) Type Structure

Fifteen new ternary antimonides T₅T' _1‐xSb_2+x were synthesized by reaction of the elemental components in an arc‐melting furnace. They crystallize with a tetragonal structure first reported for Nb₅SiSn₂ (space group I4/mcm, Z = 4.) A structure refinement from four‐circle X‐ray diffractometer data of Hf₅Fe_1‐xSb_2+x (a = 1086.0(1) pm, c = 550.1(1) pm, R = 0.033 for 270 structure factors and 18 variable parameters) showed deviations from the ideal occupancy for two atomic sites, resulting in the composition Hf_4.929(3)Fe_0.67(1)Sb_2.33(1). Structure refinements from X‐ray powder data resulted in the formula Ti₅Ni_0.45(2)Sb_2.55(2), while no deviation from the ideal composition was observed for Ti₅RhSb₂. The crystal structures of these compounds are discussed together with those of related binary and ternary compounds.     

Redox‐Controlled Exchange Bias in a Supramolecular Chain of Fe4 Single‐Molecule Magnets

Tetrairon(III) single‐molecule magnets [Fe₄(pPy)₂(dpm)₆] ( 1 ) (H₃pPy=2‐(hydroxymethyl)‐2‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane‐1,3‐diol, Hdpm=dipivaloylmethane) have been deliberately organized into supramolecular chains by reaction with Ru^IIRu^II or Ru^IIRu^III paddlewheel complexes. The products [Fe₄(pPy)₂(dpm)₆][Ru₂(OAc)₄](BF₄)_x with x=0 ( 2 a ) or x=1 ( 2 b ) differ in the electron count on the paramagnetic diruthenium bridges and display hysteresis loops of substantially different shape. Owing to their large easy‐plane anisotropy, the s=1 diruthenium(II,II) units in 2 a act as effective s_eff=0 spins and lead to negligible intrachain communication. By contrast, the mixed‐valent bridges (s=3/2, s_eff=1/2) in 2 b introduce a significant exchange bias, with concomitant enhancement of the remnant magnetization. Our results suggest the possibility to use electron transfer to tune intermolecular communication in redox‐responsive arrays of SMMs.     

Cyanide-bridged [Fe8M6] clusters displaying single-molecule magnetism (M=Ni) and electron-transfer-coupled spin transitions (M=Co)

Cyanide‐bridged metal complexes of [Fe₈M₆(μ‐CN)₁₄(CN)₁₀ (tp)₈(HL)₁₀(CH₃CN)₂][PF₆]₄?n CH₃CN?m H₂O (HL=3‐(2‐pyridyl)‐5‐[4‐(diphenylamino)phenyl]‐1H‐pyrazole), tp^?=hydrotris(pyrazolylborate), 1 : M=Ni with n=11 and m=7, and 2 : M=Co with n=14 and m=5) were prepared. Complexes 1 and 2 are isomorphous, and crystallized in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n. They have tetradecanuclear cores composed of eight low‐spin (LS) Fe^III and six high‐spin (HS) M^II ions (M=Ni and Co), all of which are bridged by cyanide ions, to form a crown‐like core structure. Magnetic susceptibility measurements revealed that intramolecular ferro‐ and antiferromagnetic interactions are operative in 1 and in a fresh sample of 2 , respectively. Ac magnetic susceptibility measurements of 1 showed frequency‐dependent in‐ and out‐of‐phase signals, characteristic of single‐molecule magnetism (SMM), while desolvated samples of 2 showed thermal‐ and photoinduced intramolecular electron‐transfer‐coupled spin transition (ETCST) between the [(LS‐Fe^II)₃(LS‐Fe^III)₅(HS‐Co^II)₃(LS‐Co^III)₃] and the [(LS‐Fe^III)₈(HS‐Co^II)₆] states.     

An Unusually Delocalized Mixed‐Valence State of a Cyanidometal‐Bridged Compound Induced by Thermal Electron Transfer

The heterometallic complexes trans ‐[Cp(dppe)FeNCRu(o ‐bpy)CNFe(dppe)Cp][PF₆]_n ( 1 [PF₆]_n , n =2, 3, 4; o ‐bpy=1,2‐bis(2,2′‐bipyridyl‐6‐yl)ethane, dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, Cp=1,3‐cyclopentadiene) in three distinct states have been synthesized and fully characterized. 1 ³⁺[PF₆]₃ and 1 ⁴⁺[PF₆]₄ are the one‐ and two‐electron oxidation products of 1 ²⁺[PF₆]₂, respectively. The investigated results suggest that 1 [PF₆]₃ is a Class II mixed valence compound. 1 [PF₆]₄ after a thermal treatment at 400 K shows an unusually delocalized mixed valence state of [Fe^III‐NC‐Ru^III‐CN‐Fe^II], which is induced by electron transfer from the central Ru^II to the terminal Fe^III in 1 [PF₆]₄, which was confirmed by IR spectroscopy, magnetic data, and EPR and Mössbauer spectroscopy.     

Zn11Rh18B8 and Zn10MRh18B8 with M = Sc,Ti, V,Cr, Mn,Fe, Co,Ni, Cu,Al, Si,Ge, Sn – New Ternary and Quaternary Zinc Rhodium Borides

Zn₁₁Rh₁₈B₈ and Zn₁₀MRh₁₈B₈ with M = Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Al, Si, Ge and Sn are obtained by reaction of the elemental components in sealed tantalum tubes at 1500 K. They crystallize tetragonally with Z = 2 in the spacegroup P4/mbm with lattice constants a = 1771.2(2) pm, c = 286.40(4) pm for Zn₁₁Rh₁₈B₈ and in the range a = 1767.65(9) pm, c = 285.96(3) pm (Zn₁₀NiRh₁₈B₈) to a = 1774.04(9) pm, c = 286.79(2) pm (Zn₁₀SnRh₁₈B₈) for the quaternary compounds. According to powder photographs all compounds are isotypic. Struture determinations based on single crystal X-ray data were performed with Zn₁₁Rh₁₈B₈, Zn₁₀FeRh₁₈B₈ and Zn₁₀NiRh₁₈B₈. The structure of Zn₁₁Rh₁₈B₈ is related to the Ti₃Co₅B₂ type. Along the short axis planar nets of rhodium atoms composed of triangles, squares, pentagons and elongated hexagons alternate with layers containing the boron and zinc atoms. The rhodium atoms form trigonal prisms centered by boron atoms, two kinds of tetragonal and pentagonal prisms centered by zinc atoms and elongated hexagonal prisms containing pairs of zinc atoms. In the quaternary compounds Zn₁₀MRh₁₈B₈ the zinc atoms in one sort of tetragonal prisms are replaced by M atoms.     

Boron Cluster Anions [BnHn]2– (n = 10, 12) in Reactions of Iron(II) and Iron(III) Complexation with 2, 2′‐Bipyridyl and 1, 10‐Phenanthroline

Complexation of Fe^II and Fe^III with azaheterocyclic ligands L (L = phen or bipy) were studied in the presence and in the absence of boron cluster anions [B_nH_n]^2– (n = 10, 12). The reactions were carried out in air at room temperature in organic solvents and/or water. In all the solvents used, well known [FeL₃]An (An = 2Cl^– or SO₄^2–) ferrous complexes were formed from Fe^II salts. Composition of ferric complexes with L ligands depends on the nature of solvent: either dinuclear oxo‐iron(III) chlorides [L₂ClFe^III–O–Fe^IIIL₂Cl]Cl₂ or ferric ferrates(III) [Fe^IIIL₂Cl₂][Fe^IIICl₄], or [Fe^IIIL₂Cl₂][Fe^IIICl₄L] were isolated from Fe^III salts. Introduction of the closo‐borate anions to a Fe³⁺(or Fe²⁺)/L/solv. mixture stabilizes ferrous cationic complexes [FeL₃]²⁺ in all the solvents used: only ferrous [FeL₃][B_nH_n] (n = 10, 12) complexes were isolated from all the reaction mixtures in the presence of boron cluster anions.