DEA environmental assessment: Measurement of damages to scale with unified efficiency under managerial disposability or environmental efficiency

This study proposes a use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for environmental assessment. Firms usually produce not only desirable but also undesirable outputs as a result of their economic activities. The concept of disposability on undesirable outputs is separated into natural and managerial disposability. Natural disposability is an environmental strategy in which firms decrease their inputs to reduce a vector of undesirable outputs. Given the reduced input vector, they attempt to increase desirable outputs as much as possible. Managerial disposability involves the opposite strategy of increasing an input vector. The concept of disposability expresses an environmental strategy that considers a regulation change on undesirable outputs as a new business opportunity. Firms attempt to improve their unified (operational and environmental) performance by utilizing new technology and/or new management. Considering the two disposability concepts, this study discusses how to measure unified efficiency under managerial disposability and then discusses how to measure environmental efficiency. The proposed uses of DEA can serve as an empirical basis for measuring new economic concepts such as “Scale Damages (SD)”, corresponding to scale economies for undesirable outputs, and “Damages to Scale (DTS)”, corresponding to returns to scale for undesirable outputs.     

Regulatory impact of environmental standards on the eco-efficiency of firms

In this paper, we propose an approach to implement environmental standards into Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and in this way to measure their regulatory impact on eco-efficiency of firms. One standard feature of basic DEA models lies in the exogeneity of inputs, desirable and undesirable outputs. Taking into account the environmental constraints, we therefore apply the bounded variable DEA model. The regulatory impact is assessed as difference in eco-efficiency scores before and after fictive introduction of an environmental standard. Furthermore, we distinguish between weak and strong disposability of undesirable outputs and develop corresponding models. Assessing the regulatory impact of environmental standards in advance provides support for environmental policymakers in choosing appropriate instruments and in adjusting the intensity of regulation.     

基于CAR-DEA方法的环境效率评价研究

现有环境效率评价的DEA方法没有考虑多维偏好约束问题,即不同决策单元对不同期望产出和不期望产出的偏好不同. 以地区为例,不同地区对GDP、废水和废气赋予的权重偏好各不相同. 在这种情况下,由于各决策单元的偏好约束不同,形成多维偏好约束集,在传统DEA模型中容易出现无可行解现象. 针对这一问题,基于CAR-DEA方法,结合保证域理论,提出一种解决多维偏好约束集问题的环境效率评价模型. 采用中国工业系统的环境效率评价实例对提出的方法进行了分析和说明.     

Shadow pricing of undesirable outputs in nonparametric analysis

For three decades a growing interest in the modeling of desirable and undesirable outputs has led to a theoretical and methodological debate in the nonparametric literature on production technology and efficiency. The first main discussion is about the way of modeling ‘bad/undesirables’ as inputs or outputs, or by transformation functions. The second debate concerns the implications of the weak disposability assumption in the modeling of bad outputs, in particular the possibility of assigning unexpected signs to shadow prices of bad outputs. In addition, we point out a current error in the modeling of weak disposability under a variable returns to scale technology. In this paper we introduce a hybrid model to ensure the economically meaningful jointness of good and bad outputs while constraining shadow prices of bad outputs to their expected sign. We argue that it is a sound compromise to model undesirable outputs with a meaningful primal/dual economic interpretation. Finally we propose an extension to define shadow prices for undesirable outputs following the Law of One Price (LoOP) rule.     

Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry

Environmental assessment recently becomes a major policy issue in the world. This study discusses how to apply Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for environmental assessment. An important feature of the DEA environmental assessment is that it needs to classify outputs into desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs because private and public entities often produce not only desirable outputs but also undesirable outputs as a result of their production activities. This study proposes the three types of unification for DEA environmental assessment by using non-radial DEA models. The first unification considers both an increase and a decrease in the input vector along with a decrease in the direction vector of undesirable outputs. This type of unification measures “unified efficiency”. The second unification considers a decrease in an input vector along with a decrease in the vector of undesirable outputs. This type of unification is referred to as “natural disposability” and measures “unified efficiency under natural disposability”. The third unification considers an increase in an input vector but a decrease in the vector of undesirable outputs. This type of unification is referred to as “managerial disposability” and measures “unified efficiency under managerial disposability”. All the unifications increase the vector of desirable outputs. To document their practical implications, this study has applied the proposed approach to compare the performance of national oil firms with that of international oil firms. This study identifies two important findings on the petroleum industry. One of the two findings is that national oil companies under public ownership outperform international oil companies under private ownership in terms of unified (operational and environmental) efficiency and unified efficiency under natural disposability. However, the performance of international oil companies exhibits an increasing trend in unified efficiency. The other finding is that national oil companies need to satisfy the environmental standard of its own country while international oil companies need to satisfy the international standard that is more restricted than the national standards. As a consequence, international oil companies outperform national oil companies in terms of unified efficiency under managerial disposability.     

非期望产出的DEA效率评价

将非期望产出作为投入应用到传统DEA模型上,解决了非期望产出生产活动的效率评价问题.结合生产可能集,将非期望产出直接反映到生产可能集中,建立了基于投入导向的径向和非径向两种DEA模型.并对两种DEA模型效率值的大小关系、相对有效性的等价性问题进行了证明,指出非径向DEA模型更能准确的实现效率定量评价.     

Modeling undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis is a mathematical programming technique for identifying efficient frontiers for peer decision making units with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. These performance factors (inputs and outputs) are classified into two groups: desirable and undesirable. Obviously, undesirable factors in production process should be reduced to improve the performance. In the current paper, we present a data envelopment analysis (DEA) model in which can be used to improve the relative performance via increasing undesirable inputs and decreasing undesirable outputs.     

Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA)

The measurement of ecological efficiency provides some important information for the companies’ environmental management. Ecological efficiency is usually measured by comparing environmental performance indicators. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) shows a high potential to support such comparisons, as no explicit weights are needed to aggregate the indicators. In general, DEA assumes that inputs and outputs are ‘goods’, but from an ecological perspective also ‘bads’ have to be considered. In the literature, ‘bads’ are treated in different and sometimes arbitrarily chosen ways. This article aims at the systematic derivation of ecologically extended DEA models. Starting from the assumptions of DEA in production theory and activity analysis, a generalisation of basic DEA models is derived by incorporating a multi-dimensional value function f. Extended preference structures can be considered by different specifications of f, e.g. specifications for ecologically motivated applications of DEA.     

Centralized DEA models with the possibility of downsizing

While traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models assess the relative efficiency of similar, independent decision making units (DMUs) centralized DEA models aim at reallocating inputs and outputs among the units setting new input and output targets for each one. This system point of view is appropriate when the DMUs belong to a common organization that allocates their inputs and appropriates their outputs. This intraorganizational perspective opens up the possibility that greater technical efficiency for the organization as a whole might be achieved by closing down some of the existing DMUs. In this paper, we present three centralized DEA models that take advantage of this possibility. Although these models involve some binary variables, we present efficient solution approaches based on Linear Programming. We also present some numerical results of the proposed models for a small problem from the literature.     

Data envelopment analysis with nonlinear virtual inputs and outputs

An underlying assumption in DEA is that the weights coupled with the ratio scales of the inputs and outputs imply linear value functions. In this paper, we present a general modeling approach to deal with outputs and/or inputs that are characterized by nonlinear value functions. To this end, we represent the nonlinear virtual outputs and/or inputs in a piece-wise linear fashion. We give the CCR model that can assess the efficiency of the units in the presence of nonlinear virtual inputs and outputs. Further, we extend the models with the assurance region approach to deal with concave output and convex input value functions. Actually, our formulations indicate a transformation of the original data set to an augmented data set where standard DEA models can then be applied, remaining thus in the grounds of the standard DEA methodology. To underline the usefulness of such a new development, we revisit a previous work of one of the authors dealing with the assessment of the human development index on the light of DEA.     

Negative features of hyperbolic and directional distance models for technologies with undesirable outputs

In data envelopment analysis for environmental performance measurement the undesirable outputs are taken into account. Ones of the standard approaches for dealing with the undesirable outputs are the hyperbolic and the directional distance measures. They both allow a simultaneous expansion of desirable outputs and a contraction of undesirable outputs by means of a single parameter. To meet environmental requirements, a technology with no disposability of undesirable outputs is often considered and the outputs are assumed to be only weakly disposable. We show that the combination of this type of technology with the hyperbolic measure, (or with its linearization, which is a special type of the directional distance model) may lead to a misleading efficiency score of the unit under evaluation. We derive the dual of the hyperbolic model under the environmental technology and describe some of its properties. Then, we use the hyperbolic and directional distance dual models for developing a second-phase method. This enables to detect the misleading scores of the decision making units. We illustrate the results on a real world data set.     

An extension to data envelopment analysis with preference structure for estimating overall inefficiency

This paper extends data envelopment analysis (DEA) with preference structure by fully considering the substitution effects among different inputs or outputs. When the unit cost and price information on inputs and outputs are available, the generalized weighted CCR (GWCCR) models proposed in this paper can provide some scalar values for measuring the overall inefficiency. It is found that the GWCCR models focus on the relative aspects of overall inefficiency instead of the absolute aspects focused on by the weighted additive DEA model.     

An extended slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with negative data

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric approach based on linear programming that has been widely applied for evaluating the relative efficiency of a set of homogeneous decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. The original DEA models use positive input and output variables that are measured on a ratio scale, but these models do not apply to the variables in which negative data can appear. However, with the widespread use of interval scale data and undesirable data, the emphasis has been directed towards the simultaneous consideration of the positive and negative data in DEA models. In this paper, using the slacks-based measure, we propose an extended model to evaluate the efficiency of DMUs, even if some variables are measured on an interval scale and some on a ratio scale. Moreover, the extended model allows for the presence of all interval-scale variables, which are capable of taking both negative and positive values.     

A new proposed model of restricted data envelopment analysis by correlation coefficients

The concept of efficiency in data envelopment analysis (DEA) is defined as weighted sum of outputs/weighted sum of inputs. In order to calculate the maximum efficiency score, each decision making unit (DMU)’s inputs and outputs are assigned to different weights. Hence, the classical DEA allows the weight flexibility. Therefore, even if they are important, the inputs or outputs of some DMUs can be assigned zero (0) weights. Thus, these inputs or outputs are neglected in the evaluation. Also, some DMUs may be defined as efficient even if they are inefficient. This situation leads to unrealistic results. Also to eliminate the problem of weight flexibility, weight restrictions are made in DEA. In our study, we proposed a new model which has not been published in the literature. We describe it as the restricted data envelopment analysis ((ARIII(COR))) model with correlation coefficients. The aim for developing this new model, is to take into account the relations between variables using correlation coefficients. Also, these relations were added as constraints to the CCR and BCC models. For this purpose, the correlation coefficients were used in the restrictions of input–output each one alone and their combination together. Inputs and outputs are related to the degree of correlation between each other in the production. Previous studies did not take into account the relationship between inputs/outputs variables. So, only with expert opinions or an objective method, weight restrictions have been made. In our study, the weights for input and output variables were determined, according to the correlations between input and output variables. The proposed new method is different from other methods in the literature, because the efficiency scores were calculated at the level of correlations between the input and/or output variables.     

A linear programming framework for free disposal hull technologies and cost functions: Primal and dual models

The free disposal hull (FDH) model, introduced by Deprins et al. [The Performance of Public Enterprises Concepts and Measurements, Elsevier, 1984], is based on a representation of the production technology given by observed production plans, imposing strong disposability of inputs and outputs but without the convexity assumption. In its traditional form, the FDH model assumes implicitly variable returns to scale (VRS) and the model was solved by a mixed integer linear program (MILP). The MILP structure is often used to compare the FDH model to data envelopment analysis (DEA) models although an equivalent FDH LP model exists (see Agrell and Tind [Journal of Productivity Analysis 16 (2) (2001) 129]). More recently, specific returns to scale (RTS) assumptions have been introduced in FDH models by Kerstens and Vanden Eeckaut [European Journal of Operational Research 113 (1999) 206], including non-increasing, non-decreasing, or constant returns to scale (NIRS, NDRS, and CRS, respectively). Podinovski [European Journal of Operational Research 152 (2004) 800] showed that the related technical efficiency measures can be computed by mixed integer linear programs. In this paper, the modeling proposed here goes one step further by introducing a complete LP framework to deal with all previous FDH models.     

Estimating the technical efficiency of health care systems: A cross-country comparison using the directional distance function

Economic activity produces not only desirable outputs but also undesirable outputs. Undesirable outputs are usually omitted from efficiency assessments (i.e., applications of Data Envelopment Analysis) which fail to express the true production process. The directional distance function model has been used for handling asymmetrically both desirable and undesirable outputs in the assessment process. In the present paper, we apply a generalized directional distance function to measure the efficiency of the health systems of 171 countries. We incorporate both desirable and undesirable outputs into the efficiency assessment without transforming the latter type of outputs into inputs or into their inverse form, as is done in most of the extant studies that deal with the measurement of health efficiency. The methodology that we apply introduces a modified definition of the efficiency score which yields results consistent with those obtained from radial DEA models. In addition, our results are independent of the length of the direction vector.     

Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) literature has proposed alternative models for performance assessment in the presence of undesirable outputs, such as pollutant emissions, where increased outputs imply reduced performance. However, the case where global equilibrium of outputs should be imposed has not yet been considered. We propose that the zero sum gains DEA (ZSG-DEA) models look especially suitable for treating equilibrium models, where the sum of the quantities produced by all decision-making units can be set as the upper admissible bound. This paper uses ZSG-DEA models to evaluate the carbon dioxide emission case study, which can be considered part of the Kyoto Protocol statement.     

Improving data envelopment analysis by the use of production trade-offs

Production technologies in data envelopment analysis (DEA) are described in terms of inputs and outputs. Production trade-offs represent simultaneous changes to the inputs and outputs that are possible in the technology under consideration. Recently, a method for their incorporation in DEA models has been developed. It was shown that the use of production trade-offs not only improves the discrimination of DEA models but also preserves the traditional meaning of efficiency as a radial improvement factor for inputs and outputs. This new paper follows the above development and provides an example of its use in the assessment of efficiency of university departments. The paper avoids excessive technical detail which can be found in the previous publication and instead focuses on the implementation of this new technique.     

不同环保意识视角下的DEA效率模型

DEA在效率分析领域具有良好的应用,随着全球气候的不断恶劣和环境的逐渐破坏,公众环保意识不断增强,在进行相关效率研究时,非期望产出越来越受到重视。以非期望产出为主要研究点,根据社会对非期望产出指标的认识规律将环保意识分为五个不同阶段,并综合考虑每个意识阶段的特征,将环境指标变动能力,环境承载能力、环境负外部性参与度、外部环境政策管理及企业生产要求纳入DEA效率分析过程中,通过对目标函数和约束条件进行不同的改进和约束,构建了不同意识阶段的DEA效率分析模型,并探讨了各阶段模型的使用范围和相互关系。最后,选取一个实例进行试算,证明各DEA模型的可行性和有效性。     

Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations

Efficiency measurement is usually based on the assumption that inputs have to be minimized and outputs have to be maximized. In a growing number of applications, however, undesirable outputs are incorporated into the production model which have to be minimized. In this paper various approaches for treating such outputs in the framework of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) are discussed and the resulting efficient frontiers are compared. New radial measures are introduced which assume that any change of the output level will involve both undesirable and desirable outputs.