Headspace single-drop microextraction of herbal essential oils

A method employing the headspace single-drop microextraction (HS-SDME) is presented for the determination of essential oils in dried herbal leaves. By optimising the key experimental parameters, a linear response for the individual target compounds was obtained in the concentration range from LOQ to 4 mg/mL (r(2) = 0.9912-0.9998), with LODs from 3.3 up to 20.5 microg per 100 g of dried leaves, and the repeatability within the RSD of 2.1-8.9%. The HS-SDME-based procedure, enabling a rapid and simple analysis of essential oils in herbs, was applied to selected real samples (nine essential oils in four different samples) in combination with GC-FID identification and quantification of the target volatiles.     

Improved single-drop microextraction for high sensitive analysis

This paper described a simple approach to prepare a small bell-mouthed extraction device for single-drop microextraction (SDME). Analytical sensitivity was improved by increasing the suspended acceptor volume. Because of the increased contact area and the rough inner surface of the extraction device, the stability of drop was markedly increased. The merits of the proposed method were demonstrated by using 1-octanol as extractant and with cyanazine, simazine and atrazine as model compounds. The related parameters and the effect of humic acid were systematically investigated. Under the optimized extraction conditions, the linear range, detection limit (S/N=3) and precision (RSD, n=6) were 0.2-50, 0.06microgL-1, 5.7% for cyanazine, 0.1-25, 0.03microgL-1, 6.7% for simazine, and 0.15-37.5, 0.04microgL-1, 5.0% for atrazine, respectively. The established method was applied to determine the target compounds in four real water samples, and the satisfactory spiked recoveries at two concentration levels were obtained. Moreover, the comparison of the proposed SDME with the traditional SDME was performed. These results indicated that the proposed improvement made SDME be a competitive analytical tool and an alternative of the traditional methods for the analysis of organic pollutants at trace level.     

Mixed liquids for single-drop microextraction of organochlorine pesticides in vegetables

A new approach for the extraction of nine kinds of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) from vegetable samples coupling single-drop microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was presented. Experimental parameters, such as organic solvent, exposure time, agitation and organic drop volume were controlled and optimized. An effective extraction was achieved by suspending a 1.00microL mixed drop of p-xylene and acetone (8:2, v/v) to the tip of a microsyringe immersed in a 2mL donor aqueous solution and stirred at 400rpm. The approach was applied to the determination of OCPs in vegetable samples with a linearity range of 0.05-20ng mL(-1) for alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta-hexachlorobenzene (BHC) and dicofol, 0.5-20ng mL(-1) for dieldrin and 2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dichloroethane (DDD) or 0.5-50ng mL(-1) for 2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dichloroethylene (DDE) and 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2 (4-chlorophenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane (p,p'-DDT). Correspondingly, the determination limit at an S/N of 3 ranged from 0.05ng mL(-1) for alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta-BHC to 0.2ng mL(-1) for dicofol, dieldrin or p,p'-DDT. The relative recoveries were from 63.3 to 100%, with repeatability ranging from 8.74 to 18.9% (relative standard deviation, R.S.D.). The single-drop microextraction was proved to be a fast and simple approach for the pre-concentration of organochlorine pesticides in vegetable samples.     

Applications of single-drop microextraction in analytical chemistry: A review

Single-drop microextraction (SDME) has been recognized as one of the simple miniaturized sample preparation tools for the isolation and preconcentration of several analytes from a complex sample matrix. In this review, we explored the applications of SDME coupled with various analytical techniques (spectroscopy, chromatography, and mass spectrometry) for the analysis of organic molecules, inorganic ions, and biomolecules from various sample matrices including food, environmental, clinical, pharmaceutical, and industrial samples. Also, it summarizes the use of nanoparticles in SDME combined with various analytical tools for the rapid analysis of several trace-level target analytes. An overview of ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents, and SUPRAS, which improved the selectivity and sensitivity of various analytical techniques toward several analytes, as promising extracting solvent systems in SDME is also included. Finally, discussed the impressive analytical features and future perspectives of SDME in this review article.     

Headspace single-drop microextraction with in-drop derivatization for aldehyde analysis

A new technique, headspace single-drop microextraction (HS-SDME) with in-drop derivatization, was developed. Its feasibility was demonstrated by analysis of the model compounds, aldehydes in water. A hanging microliter drop of solvent containing the derivatization agent of O-2,3,4,5,6-(pentaflurobenzyl)hydroxylamine hydrochloride (PFBHA) was shown to be an excellent extraction, concentration, and derivatization medium for headspace analysis of aldehydes by GC-MS. Using the microdrop solvent with PFBHA, acetaldehyde, propanal, butanal, hexanal, and heptanal in water were headspace extracted and simultaneously derivatized. The formed oximes in the microdrop were analyzed by GC-MS. HS-SDME and in-drop derivatization parameters (extraction solvent, extraction temperature, extraction time, stirring rate microdrop volume, and the headspace volume) and the method validations (linearity, precision, detection limit, and recovery) were studied. Compared to liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase microextraction, HS-SDME with in-drop derivatization is a simple, rapid, convenient, and inexpensive sample technique.     

Active single-drop microextraction for the determination of gaseous diisocyanates

Heterocyclic amines (HAs) were analysed in meat extract samples using a new method based on pressurised liquid extraction (PLE) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. This method combines the use of a pressurised fluid with a triple quadrupole MS/MS system, resulting in benefits from both systems: high extraction efficiency and sensitivity. The effects of solvent type and PLE operational parameters, such as temperature and extraction time, were studied to obtain maximum recovery of the analytes with minimum contamination. HA extraction was best achieved using dichloromethane/acetone (50/50, v/v) at 80 degrees C for 10 min. Recoveries ranged from 45% to 79% with good quality parameters: limit of detection values between 0.02 and 1 ng g(-1), linearity (r(2)>0.997), and run-to-run and day-to-day precisions with relative standard deviations lower than 13% achieved at both low (0.20 microg g(-1)) and medium (1.0 microg g(-1)) concentrations. This method reduces sample manipulation and total extraction time by nearly four-fold compared to conventional solid phase extraction. The optimised method was validated using laboratory reference material based on a meat extract, and was successfully applied to HA analysis in several cooked beef samples.     

Solid-phase microextraction versus single-drop microextraction for the analysis of nitroaromatic explosives in water samples.

This paper compares solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a recently developed extraction method called single-drop microextraction (SDME) for the analysis of nitroaromatic explosives in water samples. The two techniques are examined in terms of procedure, chromatographic analysis and method performance. All practical considerations for both techniques are also reviewed. SPME requires dedicated apparatus and is relatively expensive, as the fiber's lifetime is limited. However, it has the advantages over SDME that it can be easily used for headspace analysis and has lower detection limits for all the target analytes. SDME requires more elaborate manual operations, thus affecting linearity and precision.     

Recent advances in applications of single-drop microextraction: a review

During the past fifteen years since its introduction, single-drop microextraction has witnessed incessant growth in the range of applications of samples preparation for trace organic and inorganic analysis. This was mainly due to the array of modes that are available to accomplish extraction in harmony with the nature of analytes, and to use the extract directly for analysis by diverse instrumental methods. Whilst engineering of novel sorbent materials has expanded the sample capabilities of rival method of solid-phase microextraction, the single-drop microextraction – irrespective of the mode of extraction – uses common equipment found in analytical laboratories sans any modification, and in a much economic way. The recent innovations made in the field, as highlighted in this review article in the backdrop of historical developments, are due to the freedom in operational conditions and practicability to exploit chemical principals for optimum extraction and sensitive determination of analytes. Literature published till July 2011 has been covered.     

Capillary electrophoretic determination of ammonia using headspace single-drop microextraction

A new method involving headspace single-drop microextraction (SDME) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) is developed for the preconcentration and determination of ammonia (as dissolved NH₃ and ammonium ion). An aqueous microdrop (5 μL) containing 1 mmol/L H₃PO₄ and 0.5 mmol/L KH₂PO₄ (as internal standard) was used as the acceptor phase. Common experimental parameters (sample and acceptor phase pH, extraction temperature, extraction time) affecting the extraction efficiency were investigated. Proposed SDME-CE method provided about 14-fold enrichment in about 20 min. The calibration curve was linear for concentrations of NH₄⁺ in the range from 5 to 100 μmol/L (R² = 0.996). The LOD (S / N = 3) was estimated to be 1.5 μmol/L of NH₄⁺. Such detection sensitivity is high enough for ammonia determination in common environmental and biological samples. Finally, headspace SDME was applied to determine ammonia in human blood, seawater and milk samples with spiked recoveries in the range of 96-107%.     

Headspace single-drop microextraction for the analysis of chlorobenzenes in water samples

Exposing a microlitre organic solvent drop to the headspace of an aqueous sample contaminated with ten chlorobenzene compounds proved to be an excellent preconcentration method for headspace analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The proposed headspace single-drop microextraction (SDME) method was initially optimised and the optimum experimental conditions found were: 2.5 microl toluene microdrop exposed for 5 min to the headspace of a 10 ml aqueous sample containing 30% (w/v) NaCl placed in 15 ml vial and stirred at 1000 rpm. The calculated calibration curves gave a high level of linearity for all target analytes with correlation coefficients ranging between 0.9901 and 0.9971, except for hexachlorobenzene where the correlation coefficient was found to be 0.9886. The repeatability of the proposed method, expressed as relative standard deviation varied between 2.1 and 13.2% (n = 5). The limits of detection ranged between 0.003 and 0.031 microg/l using GC-MS with selective ion monitoring. Analysis of spiked tap and well water samples revealed that matrix had little effect on extraction. A comparative study was performed between the proposed method, headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME), solid-phase extraction (SPE) and EPA method 8121. Overall, headspace SDME proved to be a rapid, simple and sensitive technique for the analysis of chlorobenzenes in water samples, representing an excellent alternative to traditional and other, recently introduced, methods.     

Use of single-drop microextraction for determination of fentanyl in water samples

Fentanyl is a very potent synthetic narcotic analgesic. Because of its strong sedative properties, it has become an analogue of illicit drugs such as heroin. Its unambiguous detection and identification in environmental samples can be regarded as strong evidence of its illicit preparation. In this paper we report application of single-drop microextraction (SDME) for analysis of water samples spiked with fentanyl. Experimental conditions which affect the performance of SDME, for example the nature of the extracting solvent, sample stirring speed, extraction time, ionic strength, and solution pH, were optimized. The method was found to be linear in the concentration range 0.10–10 ng mL⁻¹. The limits of quantitation and detection of the method were 100 pg mL⁻¹ and <75 pg mL⁻¹, respectively. This technique is superior to other sample-preparation techniques because of the simple experimental set-up, short analysis time, high sensitivity, and minimum use of organic solvent.     

Comparison of efficiencies between single-drop microextraction and continuous-flow microextraction for the determination of methomyl in natural waters

Two liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) approaches, static direct-immersed single-drop microextraction (DI-SDME) and continuous-flow microextraction (CFME), were used to extract methomyl in water samples and their respective extraction efficiencies were compared. Several important parameters affecting extraction efficiency such as the type of extraction solvent, solvent drop volume, stirring speed or flow rate, extraction time and salt concentration were optimised. The optimised conditions were as follows: 3.0-µL tetrachloroethane (C₂H₂Cl₄) as the extraction solvent, 15% NaCl (w/v), 15 min extraction time and stirring speed at 600 rpm for DI-SDME; 3.5-µL C₂H₂Cl₄ as the extraction solvent, 15% NaCl (w/v), 21 min extraction time and flowing rate at 0.8 mL min^?1 for CFME. Under the previous optimal conditions, the linear range, detection limit (S/N = 3) and precision (RSD, n = 6) were 5.0-5000 ng mL^?1, 1.5 ng mL^?1, 6.9% for DI-SDME, and 4.0–10000 ng mL^?1, 2.5 ng mL^?1, 4.6% for CFME, respectively. Lake and river water samples were successfully analysed by DI-SDME and CFME. The result demonstrated that both SDME and CFME techniques are simple, low cost and amity to environment. As a result, the two approaches have tremendous potential in trace analysis of methomyl in natural waters.     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction versus single-drop microextraction for the determination of several endocrine-disrupting phenols from seawaters

Two liquid-phase microextraction procedures: single-drop microextraction (SDME) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), have been developed for the determination of several endocrine-disrupting phenols (EDPs) in seawaters, in combination with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detection. The EDPs studied were bisphenol-A, 4-cumylphenol, 4-tertbutylphenol, 4-octylphenol and 4-n-nonylphenol. The optimized SDME method used 2.5 μL of decanol suspended at the tip of a micro-syringe immersed in 5 mL of seawater sample, and 60 min for the extraction time. The performance of the SDME is characterized for average relative recoveries of 102 ± 11%, precision values (RSD) < 9.4% (spiked level of 50 ng mL⁻¹), and detection limits between 4 and 9 ng mL⁻¹. The optimized DLLME method used 150 μL of a mixture acetonitrile:decanol (ratio 15.7, v/v), which is quickly added to 5 mL of seawater sample, then subjected to vortex during 4 min and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for another 5 min. The performance of the DLLME is characterized for average relative recoveries of 98.7 ± 3.7%, precision values (RSD) < 7.2% (spiked level of 20 ng mL⁻¹), and detection limits between 0.2 and 1.6 ng mL⁻¹. The efficiencies of both methods have also been compared with spiked real seawater samples. The DLLME method has shown to be a more efficient approach for the determination of EDPs in seawater matrices, presenting enrichment factors ranging from 123 to 275, average relative recoveries of 110 ± 11%, and precision values (RSD) < 14%, when using a real seawaters (spiked level of 3.5 ng mL⁻¹).     

Determination of pesticide residues in honey by single-drop microextraction and gas chromatography

A novel, simple, and rapid single-drop microextraction (SDME) procedure combined with GC has been developed, validated, and applied for the determination of multiclass pesticide residues in honey samples. The SDME was optimized using a Plackett-Burman screening design considering all parameters that may influence an SDME procedure and a consequent central composite design to control the parameters that were found to significantly influence the pesticide determination. The developed analytical method required minimal volumes of organic solvents and exhibited good analytical characteristics with enrichment factors ranging from 3 for alpha-endosulfan to 10 for lindane, procymidone, and captan and method quantification limits ranging from 0.03 microg/kg for phosalone to 10.6 microg/kg for diazinon. The relative recoveries obtained ranged from 70.8% for captan to 120% for fenarimol, and the precision (RSD) ranged from 3 to 15%. The proposed SDME procedure followed by GC with an electron capture detector for quantification and GC/MS for identification was applied with success to the analysis of 17 honey samples. Monitoring results indicated a low level of honey contamination by diazinon, chlorpyrifos-ethyl, procymidone, bromopropylate, and endosulfan (alpha-, beta-, and endosulfan sulfate) residues that were far below the maximum residue limit values specified by the European Union for endosulfan (10 microg/kg) and bromopropylate (100 microg/kg) in honey samples.     

Determination of decabromodiphenyl ether in water samples by single-drop microextraction and RP-HPLC

This paper describes the development of a new method using single-drop microextraction (SDME) and RP-HPLC for the determination of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) in water samples. The effects of SDME parameters such as extraction solvent, microdrop volume, extraction time, stirring speed, salt concentration, and sample pH on the extraction performance are investigated. Under optimal extraction conditions (extraction solvent, toluene; solvent drop volume, 3.0 microL; extraction time, 15 min; stirring speed, 600 rpm; no addition of salt and change of sample pH), the calibration curve was drawn by plotting peak area against a series of BDE-209 concentrations (0.001-1 microg/mL) in aqueous solution; the correlation coefficient (r) was 0.9998. The limit of detection was 0.7 ng/mL. The enrichment factor was 10.6. The precision of this method was obtained by six successive analyses of a 100 ng/mL standard solution of BDE-209, and RSD was 4.8%. This method was successfully applied to the extraction of BDE-209 from tap and East Lake water samples with relative recoveries ranging from 92.5 to 102.8% and from 91.5 to 96.2%, respectively, and the relative standard deviations (n = 3) were 4.4 and 2.2%. The proposed method is acceptable for the analysis of BDE-209 in water samples.     

Determination of the chloroacetanilide herbicides in waters using single-drop microextraction and gas chromatography

In this article, a new method using single-drop microextraction (SDME) and gas chromatography micro-electron capture detection (GC-μECD) for the determination of chloroacetanilide herbicides (alachlor, acetochlor, metolachlor, pretilachlor and butachlor) residues was developed. The effects of SDME parameters such as extraction solvent, stirring rate, ionic strength, microdrop volume and extraction time were optimized. The optimum experimental conditions found were: 1.6 μl toluene microdrop, 5 ml water sample, 400 rpm stirring rate, 15 min extraction time and no salt addition. Analytical parameters such as linearity, repeatability and limit of detection were also evaluated. The proposed method was proved to be a simple and rapid analytical procedure for chloroacetanilide herbicides in water with limits of detection 0.0002–0.114 μg/l. The relative recoveries range from 80% to 102% for all the target analytes, with the relative standard deviations varying from 3.9% to 11.7%.     

Headspace single-drop microextraction coupled to microvolume UV-vis spectrophotometry for iodine determination

Headspace single-drop microextraction has been combined with microvolume UV-vis spectrophotometry for iodine determination. Matrix separation and preconcentration of iodide following in situ volatile iodine generation and extraction into a microdrop of N,N′-dimethylformamide is performed. An exhaustive characterization of the microextraction system and the experimental variables affecting iodine generation from iodide was carried out. The procedure employed consisted of exposing 2.5 μL of N,N′-dimethylformamide to the headspace of a 10 mL acidic (H₂SO₄ 2 mol L⁻¹) aqueous solution containing 1.7 mol L⁻¹ Na₂SO₄ for 7 min. Addition of 1 mL of H₂O₂ 1 mol L⁻¹ for in situ iodine generation was performed. The limit of detection was determined as 0.69 μg L⁻¹. The repeatability, expressed as relative standard deviation, was 4.7% (n = 6). The calibration working range was from 5 to 200 μg L⁻¹ (r² = 0.9991). The large preconcentration factor obtained, ca. 623 in only 7 min, compensate for the 10-fold loss in sensitivity caused by the decreased optical path, which results in improved detection limits as compared to spectrophotometric measurements carried out with conventional sample cells. The method was successfully applied to the determination of iodine in water, pharmaceutical and food samples.     

单滴微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用测定水中的硝基咪唑类药物

建立了单滴液相微萃取(SDME)与气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)联用技术快速检测水中的硝基咪唑类药物,对影响萃取的因素(溶剂的种类及用量、萃取时间、萃取温度及搅拌子的搅拌速度)进行优化。优化的萃取条件为:溶剂为2.5μL正辛醇,温度为50℃,搅拌速度为600 r/min,时间为20 min。萃取后,微液滴转移至衍生化试管,于70℃水浴中衍生45 min,进样分析。该方法在水中的线性范围为0.5~400μg/L,线性相关系数良好(r0.998),检测限为0.16~0.57μg/L。加标自来水和湖水中的相对平均回收率为80.9%~103.6%,相对标准偏差为1.7%~9.0%。