Pentacarbonyl(4‐phenylpyridine)­tungsten(0) and pentacarbonyl(2‐phenylpyridine)chromium(0)

In penta­carbonyl(4‐phenyl­pyridine)­tungsten(0), [W­(C₁₁H₉N)(CO)₅], the mol­ecules have mm site symmetry and the pyridine ligand, with m symmetry, is completely planar. In penta­carbonyl(2‐phenyl­pyridine)­chromium(0), [Cr(C₁₁­H₉N)(CO)₅], the mol­ecules are in general positions and the phenyl and pyridine rings of the ligand are twisted by 67.7 (3)° with respect to one another by rotation about the C—C bond joining them. In both compounds, the axial M—C_carbonyl bond trans to the M—N_ligand bond is significantly shorter than the equatorial M—C_carbonyl bonds.     

Bis(glycinato‐κ2N,O)dinitrosylmolybdenum(0) and bis(2‐aminoethanethiolato‐κ2N,S)dinitrosylmolybdenum(0) acetonitrile monosolvate

The title compounds, [Mo(C₂H₄NO₂)₂(NO)₂], (I), and [Mo(C₂H₆NS)₂(NO)₂]·CH₃CN, (II), contain distorted octahedral complexes in which the monoanionic N,S‐ and N,O‐bidentate ligands coordinate the molybdenum centres in different modes. The anionic O atoms of the glycinate ligands in (I) are coordinated trans to the nitrosyl ligands and the amine N atoms are located trans to each other, whereas in (II) the anionic S atoms are coordinated trans to each other and the amine N atoms are located trans to the nitrosyl ligands. Each compound has a single complete complex in the asymmetric unit on a general position. Six N—H...O contacts with N...O distances of less than 3.2 Å are observed in (I) between the amine groups and the nitrosyl and carboxylate O atoms. In the 1:1 solvate (II), the acetonitrile molecule forms short N—H...N contacts (N...N < 3.2 Å) between the solvent N atoms and one of the amine H atoms. In addition, three weak intermolecular N—H...S interactions (N...S > 3.3 Å) contribute to the stabilization of the structure of (II).     

Vapor phase infrared spectrum and coriolis coupling constants of pentacarbonyl(thiocarbonyl)chromium(0)

Several band contours have been successfully resolved in the high-resolution IR spectrum of pentacarbonyl(thiocarbonyl)chromium(0) vapor at ~312 K. However, PQR separations are only clearly discernible for the three v(CO) fundamentals (v₁,v₂ and v₁₆). The good agreement between the observed and calculated PR separations of the two a₁v(CO) modes (v₁ and v₂) verifies the C_4v prolate symmetrical top geometry of the molecule. From band shape analyses, the Coriolis coupling constants of the ev(CO) mode (v₁₆) and the e δ (CrCO) mode (v₁₇) are estimated to be —0.45 ± 0.05 and —0.80 ± 0.15, respectively.     

Two molybdenum pentacarbonyl complexes with electroneutral phosphane ligands: [bis(morpholin‐4‐yl)(pentafluoroethyl)phosphane‐κP]pentacarbonylmolybdenum(0) and pentacarbonyl[(pentafluoroethyl)bis(piperidin‐1‐yl)phosphane‐κP]molybdenum(0)

The crystal structures of the title compounds, [Mo{(C₄H₈NO)₂P(C₂F₅)}(CO)₅], (1a), and [Mo{(C₅H₁₀N)₂P(C₂F₅)}(CO)₅], (2a), were determined as part of a larger project that focuses on the synthesis and coordination chemistry of phosphane ligands possessing moderate (electroneutral, i.e. neither electron‐rich nor electron‐deficient) electronic characteristics. Both complexes feature a slightly distorted octahedral geometry at the metal center, due to the electronic and steric repulsions between two of the four equatorial CO groups and the pentafluoroethyl group attached to the phosphane ligand. Bond length and angle data for (1a) and (2a) support the conclusion that the free phosphane ligands are electroneutral. For complex (1a), the Mo—P, Mo—C_ax and Mo—C_eq(ave) bond lengths are 2.5063 (5), 2.018 (2) and 2.048 (2) Å, respectively, and for complex (2a) these values are 2.5274 (5), 2.009 (3) and 2.050 (3) Å, respectively. Geometric data for (1a) and (2a) are compared with similar data reported for analogous Mo(CO)₅ complexes.