A degree condition for the existence of regular factors in K1, n-free graphs

A graph is called K_{1, n}-free if it contains no K_{1, n} as an induced subgraph. Let n(≥3), r be integers (if r is odd, r ≥ n − 1). We prove that every K_{1, n}-free connected graph G with r|V(G)| even has an r-factor if its minimum degree is at least. $ \left(n+{{n-1}\over{r}}\right) \left\lceil {n\over{2(n-1)}}r \right\rceil - {{n-1}\over{r}}\left(\left\lceil {n\over{2(n-1)}}r \right\rceil \right)^2+n-3. $ This degree condition is sharp. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Disjoint cycles in star-free graphs

A graph is claw-free if it does not contain K_1.3 as an induced subgraph. It is K_1.r-free if it does not contain K_1.r as an induced subgraph. We show that if a graph is K_1.r-free (r ≥ 4), only p + 2r − 1 edges are needed to insure that G has two disjoint cycles. As an easy consequence we get a well-known result of Pósa's. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Edge disjoint cycles in graphs

Ore proved in 1960 that if G is a graph of order n and the sum of the degrees of any pair of nonadjacent vertices is at least n, then G has a hamiltonian cycle. In 1986, Li Hao and Zhu Yongjin showed that if n ? 20 and the minimum degree δ is at least 5, then the graph G above contains at least two edge disjoint hamiltonian cycles. The result of this paper is that if n ? 2δ², then for any 3 ? l₁ ? l₂ ? ? ? l_k ? n, 1 = k = [(δ - 1)/2], such graph has K edge disjoint cycles with lengths l₁, l₂…l_k, respectively. In particular, when l₁ = l₂ = ? = l_k = n and k = [(δ - 1)/2], the graph contains [(δ - 1)/2] edge disjoint hamiltonian cycles.     

Independence number,connectivity, and r-factors

We show that if r ? 1 is an odd integer and G is a graph with |V(G)| even such that k(G) ? (r + 1)²/2 and (r + 1)²α(G) ? 4rk(G), then G has an r-factor; if r ? 2 is even and G is a graph with k(G) ? r(r + 2)/2 and (r + 2)α(G) ? 4k(G), then G has an r-factor (where k(G) and α(G) denote the connectivity and the independence number of G, respectively).     

On the parity of crossing numbers

For an integer n ? 1, a graph G has an n-constant crossing number if, for any two good drawings ? and ?′ of G in the plane, μ(?) ≡ μ(?′) (mod n), where μ(?) is the number of crossings in ?. We prove that, except for trivial cases, a graph G has n-constant crossing number if and only if n = 2 and G is either K_p or K_q,r, where p, q, and r are odd.     

On three zero-sum Ramsey-type problems

For a graph G whose number of edges is divisible by k, let R(G,Z_k) denote the minimum integer r such that for every function f: E(K_r) ? Z_k there is a copy G¹ of G in K_r so that Σe∈E(G¹) f(e) = 0 (in Z_k). We prove that for every integer k₁ R(K_n, Z_k) ≤ n + O(k³ log k) provided n is sufficiently large as a function of k and k divides (). If, in addition, k is an odd prime-power then R(K_n, Z_k) ≤ n + 2k - 2 and this is tight if k is a prime that divides n. A related result is obtained for hypergraphs. It is further shown that for every graph G on n vertices with an even number of edges R(G,Z₂) ≤ n + 2. This estimate is sharp. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

4-factors in 2-connected star-free graphs

Let t≥3 be an integer. We show that if G is a 2-connected K_1,t-free graph with minimum degree at least (3t+1)/2, then G has a 4-factor.     

Partitioning complete multipartite graphs by monochromatic trees

The tree partition number of an r‐edge‐colored graph G, denoted by t_r(G), is the minimum number k such that whenever the edges of G are colored with r colors, the vertices of G can be covered by at most k vertex‐disjoint monochromatic trees. We determine t₂(K(n₁, n₂,…, n_k)) of the complete k‐partite graph K(n₁, n₂,…, n_k). In particular, we prove that t₂(K(n, m)) = ? (m‐2)/2ⁿ? + 2, where 1 ≤ n ≤ m. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 48: 133–141, 2005     

Generalized degree conditions for graphs with bounded independence number

We consider a generalized degree condition based on the cardinality of the neighborhood union of arbitrary sets of r vertices. We show that a Dirac-type bound on this degree in conjunction with a bound on the independence number of a graph is sufficient to imply certain hamiltonian properties in graphs. For K_1,m-free grphs we obtain generalizations of known results. In particular we show: Theorem. Let r ≥ 1 and m ≥ 3 be integers. Then for each nonnegative function f(r, m) there exists a constant C = C(r, m, f(r, m)) such that if G is a graph of order n (n ≥ r, n > m) with δ_r(G) ≥ (n/3) + C and β (G) ≥ f(r, m), then (a) G is traceable if δ(G) ≥ r and G is connected; (b) G is hamiltonian if δ(G) ≥ r + 1 and G is 2-connected; (c) G is hamiltonian-connected if δ(G) ≥ r + 2 and G is 3-connected. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Stability for large forbidden subgraphs

In this note we strengthen the stability theorem of Erd?s and Simonovits. Write K_r(s₁, …, s_r) for the complete r‐partite graph with classes of sizes s₁, …, s_r and T_r(n) for the r‐partite Turán graph of order n. Our main result is: For all r≥2 and all sufficiently small c>0, ε>0, every graph G of sufficiently large order n with e(G)>(1?1/r?ε)n²/2 satisfies one of the conditions:

• (a) G contains a $K_{r+1} (\lfloor c\,\mbox{ln}\,n \rfloor,\ldots,\lfloor c\,\mbox{ln}\,n \rfloor,\lceil n^{{1}-\sqrt{c}}\rceil)In this note we strengthen the stability theorem of Erd?s and Simonovits. Write K_r(s₁, …, s_r) for the complete r‐partite graph with classes of sizes s₁, …, s_r and T_r(n) for the r‐partite Turán graph of order n. Our main result is: For all r≥2 and all sufficiently small c>0, ε>0, every graph G of sufficiently large order n with e(G)>(1?1/r?ε)n²/2 satisfies one of the conditions:
  • (a) G contains a $K_{r+1} (\lfloor c\,\mbox{ln}\,n \rfloor,\ldots,\lfloor c\,\mbox{ln}\,n \rfloor,\lceil n^{{1}-\sqrt{c}}\rceil)$;
  • (b) G differs from T_r(n) in fewer than (ε^1/3+c^1/(3r+3))n² edges.
  Letting µ(G) be the spectral radius of G, we prove also a spectral stability theorem: For all r≥2 and all sufficiently small c>0, ε>0, every graph G of sufficiently large order n with µ(G)>(1?1/r?ε)n satisfies one of the conditions:
  • (a) G contains a $K_{r+1}(\lfloor c\,\mbox{ln}\,n\rfloor,\ldots,\lfloor c\,\mbox{ln}\,n\rfloor,\lceil n^{1-\sqrt{c}}\rceil)$;
  • (b) G differs from T_r(n) in fewer than (ε^1/4+c^1/(8r+8))n² edges.
  © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 62: 362–368, 2009     

Overlap number of graphs

An overlap representation of a graph G assigns sets to vertices so that vertices are adjacent if and only if their assigned sets intersect with neither containing the other. The overlap number φ(G) (introduced by Rosgen) is the minimum size of the union of the sets in such a representation. We prove the following: (1) An optimal overlap representation of a tree can be produced in linear time, and its size is the number of vertices in the largest subtree in which the neighbor of any leaf has degree 2. (2) If δ(G)?2 and G≠K₃, then φ(G)?|E(G)| ? 1, with equality when G is connected and triangle‐free and has no star‐cutset. (3) If G is an n‐vertex plane graph with n?5, then φ(G)?2n ? 5, with equality when every face has length 4 and there is no star‐cutset. (4) If G is an n‐vertex graph with n?14, then φ(G)?n²/4 ? n/2 ? 1, with equality for even n when G arises from K_{n/2, n/2} by deleting a perfect matching. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

All cycle‐complete graph Ramsey numbers r(Cm,K6)

The cycle‐complete graph Ramsey number r(C_m, K_n) is the smallest integer N such that every graph G of order N contains a cycle C_m on m vertices or has independence number α(G) ≥ n. It has been conjectured by Erd?s, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp that r(C_m, K_n) = (m ? 1) (n ? 1) + 1 for all m ≥ n ≥ 3 (except r(C₃, K₃) = 6). This conjecture holds for 3 ≤ n ≤ 5. In this paper we will present a proof for n = 6 and for all n ≥ 7 with m ≥ n² ? 2n. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 44: 251–260, 2003     

Complete subgraphs with large degree sums

Let t(n, k) denote the Turán number—the maximum number of edges in a graph on n vertices that does not contain a complete graph K_k+1. It is shown that if G is a graph on n vertices with n ≥ k²(k – 1)/4 and m < t(n, k) edges, then G contains a complete subgraph K_k such that the sum of the degrees of the vertices is at least 2km/n. This result is sharp in an asymptotic sense in that the sum of the degrees of the vertices of K_k is not in general larger, and if the number of edges in G is at most t(n, k) – ? (for an appropriate ?), then the conclusion is not in general true. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Spanning 3-ended trees in k-connected K 1,4-free graphs

A tree with at most m leaves is called an m-ended tree.Kyaw proved that every connected K1,4-free graph withσ4(G)n-1 contains a spanning 3-ended tree.In this paper we obtain a result for k-connected K1,4-free graphs with k 2.Let G be a k-connected K1,4-free graph of order n with k 2.Ifσk+3(G)n+2k-2,then G contains a spanning 3-ended tree.     

Retracts of box products with odd‐angulated factors

Let G be a connected graph with odd girth 2κ+1. Then G is a (2κ+1)‐angulated graph if every two vertices of G are connected by a path such that each edge of the path is in some (2κ+1)‐cycle. We prove that if G is (2κ+1)‐angulated, and H is connected with odd girth at least 2κ+3, then any retract of the box (or Cartesian) product G□ H is S□T where S is a retract of G and T is a connected subgraph of H. A graph G is strongly (2κ+1)‐angulated if any two vertices of G are connected by a sequence of (2κ+1)‐cycles with consecutive cycles sharing at least one edge. We prove that if G is strongly (2κ+1)‐angulated, and H is connected with odd girth at least 2κ+1, then any retract of G□ H is S□T where S is a retract of G and T is a connected subgraph of H or |V(S)|=1 and T is a retract of H. These two results improve theorems on weakly and strongly triangulated graphs by Nowakowski and Rival [Disc Math 70 ( 13 ), 169–184]. As a corollary, we get that the core of the box product of two strongly (2κ+1)‐angulated cores must be either one of the factors or the box product itself. Furthermore, if G is a strongly (2κ+1)‐angulated core, then either Gⁿ is a core for all positive integers n, or the core of Gⁿ is G for all positive integers n. In the latter case, G is homomorphically equivalent to a normal Cayley graph [Larose, Laviolette, Tardiff, European J Combin 19 ( 12 ), 867–881]. In particular, let G be a strongly (2κ+1)‐angulated core such that either G is not vertex‐transitive, or G is vertex‐transitive and any two maximum independent sets have non‐empty intersection. Then Gⁿ is a core for any positive integer n. On the other hand, let G_i be a (2κ_i+1)‐angulated core for 1 ≤ i≤ n where κ₁ < κ₂ < … < κ_n. If G_i has a vertex that is fixed under any automorphism for 1 ≤ i ≤ n‐1, or G_i is vertex‐transitive such that any two maximum independent sets have non‐empty intersection for 1 ≤ i ≤ n‐1, then □_i=1ⁿ G_i is a core. We then apply the results to construct cores that are box products with Mycielski construction factors or with odd graph factors. We also show that K(r,2r+1) □ C_2l+1 is a core for any integers l ≥ r ≥ 2. It is open whether K(r,2r+1) □ C_2l+1 is a core for r > l ≥ 2. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Large induced forests in sparse graphs

For a graph G, let a(G) denote the maximum size of a subset of vertices that induces a forest. Suppose that G is connected with n vertices, e edges, and maximum degree Δ. Our results include: (a) if Δ ≤ 3, and G ≠ K₄, then a(G) ≥ n ? e/4 ? 1/4 and this is sharp for all permissible e ≡ 3 (mod 4); and (b) if Δ ≥ 3, then a(G) ≥ α(G) + (n ? α(G))/(Δ ? 1)². Several problems remain open. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 38: 113–123, 2001     

Cycles intersecting a prescribed vertex set

A graph is said to have property P(k,l)(k ? l) if for any X ∈ (^G_k) there exists a cycle such that |X ∩ V(C)| = l. Obviously an n-connected graph (n ? 2) satisfies P(n,n). In this paper, we study parameters k and l such that every n-connected graph satisfies P(k,l). We show that for r = 1 or 2 every n-connected graph satisfies P(n + r,n). For r = 3, there are infinitely many 3-connected graphs that do not satisfy P(6,3). However, if n ? max{3,(2r ?1)(r + 1)}, then every n-connected graph satisfies P(n + r,n).     

Line graphs of bipartite graphs with Hamiltonian paths

It is shown that, if t is an integer ≥3 and not equal to 7 or 8, then there is a unique maximal graph having the path P_t as a star complement for the eigenvalue ?2. The maximal graph is the line graph of K_m,m if t = 2m?1, and of K_m,m+1 if t = 2m. This result yields a characterization of L(G ) when G is a (t + 1)‐vertex bipartite graph with a Hamiltonian path. The graphs with star complement P_r ∪ P_s or P_r ∪ C_s for ?2 are also determined. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 43: 137–149, 2003     

On minors of graphs with at least 3n −4 edges

A point disconnecting set S of a graph G is a nontrivial m-separator, where m = |S|, if the connected components of G - S can be partitioned into two subgraphs, each of which has at least two points. A 3-connected graph is quasi 4-connected if it has no nontrivial 3-separators. Suppose G is a graph having n ≥ 6 points. We prove three results: (1) If G is quasi 4-connected with at least 3n - 4 edges, then the graph K^?₁, obtained from K₆ by deleting an edge, is a minor of G. (2) If G has at least 3n - 4 edges then either K^?₆ or the graph obtained by pasting two disjoint copies of K₅ together along a triangle is a minor of G. (3) If the minimum degree of G is at least 6, then K^?₆ is a minor of G. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Maximum hitting time for random walks on graphs

For x and y vertices of a connected graph G, let T_G(x, y) denote the expected time before a random walk starting from x reaches y. We determine, for each n > 0, the n-vertex graph G and vertices x and y for which T_G(x, y) is maximized. the extremal graph consists of a clique on ?(2n + 1)/3?) (or ?)(2_n ? 2)/3?) vertices, including x, to which a path on the remaining vertices, ending in y, has been attached; the expected time T_G(x, y) to reach y from x in this graph is approximately 4_n³/27.