Reaktion von cyclopentadienyl-substituierten Molybdän(V)-tetrachloriden mit LiPH(2,4,6-BuC6H2) und KPPh2(Dioxan)2. Molekülstrukturen von [Cp0Mo(μ-Cl)2]2 und [CpMo2(μ-Cl)3(μ-PPh2)] (Cp0 = C5Me4Et)

Reaction of Cyclopentadienyl Substituted Molybdenum(V) Tetrachlorides with LiPH(2,4,6-Bu C₆H₂) and KPPh₂(Dioxane)₂. Crystal Structures of [Cp⁰Mo(μ? Cl)₂]₂ and [Cp Mo₂(μ? Cl)₃(μ? PPh₂)] (Cp⁰ = C₅Me₄Et) The reaction of [Cp⁰Mo(CO)₃]₂ (Cp⁰ = C₅Me₄Et) and [Cp′Mo(CO)₃]₂ (Cp′ = C₅H₄Me) with PCl₅ in CH₃CN furnishes the Mo(V) complexes Cp⁰MoCl₄(CH₃CN) 1 and Cp′MoCl₄(CH₃CN) 2 in good yields. While 1 and 2 are reduced by LiPH(2,4,6-BuC₆H₂) to the Mo(III) complexes [Cp⁰Mo(μ? Cl)₂]₂ 3 and [Cp′Mo(μ? Cl)₂]₂ 4 , the reaction of 1 with KPPh₂(dioxane)₂ yields the reduction/substitution product [CpMo₂(μ? Cl)₃(μ? PPh)] 5 in low yield. 1 – 4 were characterized spectroscopically (i.r., mass, 3 and 4 also n.m.r.). An X-ray crystal structure determination was carried out on 3 and 5. 3 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (No. 2) with a = 8.278(4), b = 12.508(7), c = 12.826(7) Å, α = 86.78(5), β = 81.55(2), γ = 75.65(4)°, V = 1 272.4 ų and two formula units in the unit cell (data collection at ? 67°C, 4 255 independent observed reflections, R = 2.9%); 5 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (No. 2) with a = 11.536(8), b = 12.307(9), c = 13.157(9) Å, α = 91.41(6), β = 100.42(5), γ = 112.26(6)°, V = 1 688.7 ų and two formula units in the unit cell (data collection at ? 60°C, 6 147 independent observed reflections, R = 4.9%). The crystal structure of 3 shows the presence of centrosymmetric dimeric molecules with four bridging chloro ligands. In 5, two Mo atoms are bridged by three chloro ligands and one PPh₂ ligand. The Mo? Mo bond length in 3 and 5 (2.600(2), 2.596(2) Å and 2.6388(8) Å) is in agreement with a Mo? Mo bond.     

Zur Reaktivität von Titanocenkomplexen [Ti(Cp′)2(η2‐Me3SiC≡CSiMe3)] (Cp′ = Cp,Cp*) gegenüber Benzoldicarbonsäuren

On the Reactivity of Titanocene Complexes [Ti(Cp′)₂(η²‐Me₃SiC≡CSiMe₃)] (Cp′ = Cp, Cp*) towards Benzenedicarboxylic Acids Titanocene complexes [Ti(Cp′)₂(BTMSA)] ( 1a , Cp′ = Cp = η⁵‐C₅H₅; 1b , Cp′ = Cp* = η⁵‐C₅Me₅; BTMSA = Me₃SiC≡CSiMe₃) were found to react with iodine and methyl iodide yielding [Ti(Cp′)₂(μ‐I)₂] ( 2a / b ; a refers to Cp′ = Cp and b to Cp′ = Cp*), [Ti(Cp′)₂I₂] ( 3a / b ) and [Ti(Cp′)₂(Me)I] ( 4a / b ), respectively. In contrast to 2a , complex 2b proved to be highly moisture sensitive yielding with cleavage of HCp* [{Ti(Cp*)I}₂(μ‐O)] ( 7 ). The corresponding reactions of 1a / b with p‐cresol and thiophenol resulted in the formation of [Ti(Cp′)₂{O(p‐Tol)}₂] ( 5a / b ) and [Ti(Cp′)₂(SPh)₂] ( 6a / b ), respectively. Reactions of 1a and 1b with 1,n‐benzenedicarboxylic acids (n = 2–4) resulted in the formation of dinuclear titanium(III) complexes of the type [{Ti(Cp′)₂}₂{μ‐1,n‐(O₂C)₂C₆H₄}] (n = 2, 8a / b ; n = 3, 9a / b ; n = 4, 10a / b ). All complexes were fully characterized analytically and spectroscopically. Furthermore, complexes 7 , 8b , 9a ·THF, 10a / b were also be characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

[{Cp″Co}3(μ3-P)(μ3-PSe)], ein Dreikerncluster mit einem PSe-Liganden

[{Cp″Co}₃(μ₃-P)(μ₃-PSe)], a Trinuclear Cluster with a PSe Ligand The cothermolysis of [Cp″Co(CO)₂] ( 1 ), Cp″ = C₅H₃Bu-1.3, and P₄ gives besides [{Cp″Co}₃(μ₃-P)₂] ( 2 ) the cobalt P_n complexes [{Cp″Co}₄(μ₃-P)₄] ( 3 ) and [{Cp″Co}₂(μ, η^2:2-P₂)₂] ( 4 ). 2 can be oxidized with grey selenium forming [{Cp″Co}₃(μ₃-P)(μ₃-PSe)] ( 5 ) and [{Cp″Co}₃(μ₃-PSe)₂] ( 6 ), complexes with the hitherto unknown PSe ligand. The crystal structure of 5 reveals a trigonal-bipyramidal Co₃P₂ skeleton with one μ₃-PSe ligand.     

Addition von kationischen Lewis‐Säuren [M′Ln]+ (M′Ln = Fe(CO)2Cp,Fe(CO)(PPh3)Cp,Ru(PPh3)2Cp,Re(CO)5, ${1 \over 2}$ Pt(PPh3)2, W(CO)3Cp an die anionischen Thiocarbonyl‐Komplexe [HB(pz)3(OC)2M(CS)]− (M = Mo,W; pz = 3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl)

Addition of Cationic Lewis Acids [M′L_n]⁺ (M′L_n = Fe(CO)₂Cp, Fe(CO)(PPh₃)Cp, Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp, Re(CO)₅, Pt(PPh₃)₂, W(CO)₃Cp to the Anionic Thiocarbonyl Complexes [HB(pz)₃(OC)₂M(CS)]⁻ (M = Mo, W; pz = 3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl) Adducts from Organometallic Lewis Acids [Fe(CO)₂Cp]⁺, [Fe(CO)(PPh₃)Cp]⁺, [Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp]⁺, [Re(CO)₅]⁺, [ Pt(PPh₃)₂]⁺, [W(CO)₃Cp]⁺ and the anionic thiocarbonyl complexes [HB(pz)₃(OC)₂M(CS)]⁻ (M = Mo, W) have been prepared. Their spectroscopic data indicate that the addition of the cations occurs at the sulphur atom to give end‐to‐end thiocarbonyl bridged complexes [HB(pz)₃(OC)₂MCSM′L_n].     

Synthesis,Structure, Bonding,and Reactivity of Metal Complexes Comprising Diborane(4) and Diborene(2): [{Cp*Mo(CO)2}2{μ‐η2:η2‐B2H4}] and [{Cp*M(CO)2}2B2H2M(CO)4], M=Mo,W

The reaction of [(Cp*Mo)₂(μ‐Cl)₂B₂H₆] ( 1 ) with CO at room temperature led to the formation of the highly fluxional species [{Cp*Mo(CO)₂}₂{μ‐η²:η²‐B₂H₄}] ( 2 ). Compound 2, to the best of our knowledge, is the first example of a bimetallic diborane(4) conforming to a singly bridged C_s structure. Theoretical studies show that 2 mimics the Cotton dimolybdenum–alkyne complex [{CpMo(CO)₂}₂C₂H₂]. In an attempt to replace two hydrogen atoms of diborane(4) in 2 with a 2e [W(CO)₄] fragment, [{Cp*Mo(CO)₂}₂ B₂H₂W(CO)₄] ( 3 ) was isolated upon treatment with [W(CO)₅?thf]. Compound 3 shows the intriguing presence of [B₂H₂] with a short B?B length of 1.624(4) Å. We isolated the tungsten analogues of 3 , [{Cp*W(CO)₂}₂B₂H₂W(CO)₄] ( 4 ) and [{Cp*W(CO)₂}₂B₂H₂Mo(CO)₄] ( 5 ), which provided direct proof of the existence of the tungsten analogue of 2 .     

2,5-Dimethylthiophene coordination to three metal centers in the complexes (η4, S-μ3-2,5-Me2T)(IrCp*) [M(CO)2Cp]2 where MMo or W

The 2,5-dimethylthiophene (2,5-Me₂T) ligand in the isomers Cp*Ir(η⁴-2,5-Me₂T) (1) and Cp*Ir(C,S-2,5-Me₂T) (2) is activated to react with the dimers Cp(CO)₂M?M(CO)₂Cp[M?Mo (3), W (4)] to give complexes (5,6) in which the thiophene is coordinated to three metals. Oxidation of 5 with Cp₂Fe⁺ removes the Mo dimer to give Cp*Ir(η⁵-2,5-Me₂T)²⁺. Reaction of 5 with CO displaces the Mo as [CpMo(CO)₃]₂ to give Cp*Ir(CO)(C,S-2,5-Me₂T) (7). Ultraviolet photolysis of 1 provides a convenient route to the ring-opened isomer 2. Despite the remarkable nature of the thiophene coordination in 5 and 6, its reactivity does not suggest new pathways that would lead to the hydrodesulfurization of thiophenes.     

New Heteronuclear Bridged Borylene Complexes That Were Derived from [{Cp*CoCl}2] and Mono‐Metal?Carbonyl Fragments

The synthesis, structural characterization, and reactivity of new bridged borylene complexes are reported. The reaction of [{Cp*CoCl}₂] with LiBH₄ ? THF at ?70 °C, followed by treatment with [M(CO)₃(MeCN)₃] (M=W, Mo, and Cr) under mild conditions, yielded heteronuclear triply bridged borylene complexes, [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)M(CO)₅] ( 1 – 3 ; 1 : M=W, 2 : M=Mo, 3 : M=Cr). During the syntheses of complexes 1 – 3 , capped‐octahedral cluster [(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐H)(BH)₄{Co(CO)₂}] ( 4 ) was also isolated in good yield. Complexes 1 – 3 are isoelectronic and isostructural to [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO){Fe(CO)₃}] ( 5 ) and [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐CO){Mn(CO)₃}] ( 6 ), with a trigonal‐pyramidal geometry in which the μ₃‐BH ligand occupies the apical vertex. To test the reactivity of these borylene complexes towards bis‐phosphine ligands, the room‐temperature photolysis of complexes 1 – 3 , 5 , 6 , and [{(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Ru)Fe(CO)₃}₂(μ‐CO)] ( 7 ) was carried out. Most of these complexes led to decomposition, although photolysis of complex 7 with [Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂] (n=1–3) yielded complexes 9 – 11 , [3,4‐(Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂)‐closo‐1,2,3,4‐Ru₂Fe₂(BH)₂] ( 9 : n=1, 10 : n=2, 11 : n=3). Quantum‐chemical calculations by using DFT methods were carried out on compounds 1 – 3 and 9 – 11 and showed reasonable agreement with the experimentally obtained structural parameters, that is, large HOMO–LUMO gaps, in accordance with the high stabilities of these complexes, and NMR chemical shifts that accurately reflected the experimentally observed resonances. All of the new compounds were characterized in solution by using mass spectrometry, IR spectroscopy, and ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹¹B NMR spectroscopy and their structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of complexes 1 , 2 , 4 , 9 , and 10 .     

Neue 1,1′-Ferrocendichalkogenato-Komplexe des Rutheniums und Osmiums

New 1,1′-Ferrocene Dichalcogenato Complexes of Ruthenium and Osmium Both trinuclear 1,1′-ferrocene dichalcogenato complexes(¹) such as fc(E[ML_n])₂ ( 1a—c ) (with [ML_n] = Ru(CO)₂Cp*; E = S, Se, Te) and dinuclear [3]ferrocenophane derivatives of the type fcE₂[ML_n] (with [ML_n] = Ru(CO)(η⁶-C₆Me₆) ( 2a, b ), Ru(NO)Cp* ( 3a, b ) (E = S, Se) or Os(NO)Cp* ( 4a—c ) (E = S, Se, Te)) were synthesized and characterized by their IR-, ¹H- and ¹³C NMR spectra as well as their mass spectra. The molecular structure of fcS₂[Os(NO)Cp*] ( 4a ) was determined by an X-Ray structure analysis; the long Fe…?Os distance of 431.1(1)pm excludes any direct bonding interactions.     

Heterobimetallische phosphanido-verbrückte Zweikern-Komplexe - Synthese von cis-rac-[(η-C5H4R)2Zr{μ-PH(2,4,6−iPr3C6H2)}2M(CO)4] (RMe,MCr,Mo; RH,MMo)

Heterobimetallic Phosphanido-bridged Dinuclear Complexes - Syntheses of cis-rac-[(η-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{μ-PH(2,4,6-ⁱPr₃C₆H₂)}₂M(CO)₄] (R?Me, M?Cr, Mo; R?H, M?Mo) The zirconocene bisphosphanido complexes [(η-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{PH(2,4,6-ⁱPr₃C₆H₂)}₂] (R?Me, H) react with [(NBD)M(CO)₄] (NBD?norbornadiene, M?Cr, Mo) to give only one diastereomer of the phosphanido-bridged heterobimetallic dinuclear complexes cis-rac-[(η-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{μ-PH(2,4,6-ⁱPr₃C₆H₂)}₂M(CO)₄] [R?Me, M?Cr ( 1 ), Mo ( 2 ); R?H, M?Mo ( 3 )]. However, no reaction was observed between [(η-C₅H₅)₂Zr{PH(2,4,6-^tBu₃ C₆H₂)}₂] and [Pt(PPh₃)₄]. 1—3 were characterised spectroscopically. For 1—3 , the presence of the racemic isomer was shown by NMR spectroscopy. No reaction was observed at room temperature for 3 and CS₂, (NO)BF₄, Me₃NO or PH(2,4,6-Me₃C₆H₂)₂. With Et₂AlH or PhC?CH decomposition of 3 was observed.     

Iodination of cyclo‐E5‐Complexes (E=P,As)

In a high‐yield one‐pot synthesis, the reactions of [Cp*M(η⁵‐P₅)] (M=Fe ( 1 ), Ru ( 2 )) with I₂ resulted in the selective formation of [Cp*MP₆I₆]⁺ salts ( 3 , 4 ). The products comprise unprecedented all‐cis tripodal triphosphino‐cyclotriphosphine ligands. The iodination of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 6 ) gave, in addition to [Fe(CH₃CN)₆]²⁺ salts of the rare [As₆I₈]^2? (in 7 ) and [As₄I₁₄]^2? (in 8 ) anions, the first di‐cationic Fe‐As triple decker complex [(Cp*Fe)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈] ( 9 ). In contrast, the iodination of [Cp*Ru(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 10 ) did not result in the full cleavage of the M?As bonds. Instead, a number of dinuclear complexes were obtained: [(Cp*Ru)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈]_0.5 ( 11 ) represents the first Ru‐As₅ triple decker complex, thus completing the series of monocationic complexes [(Cp^RM)₂(μ,η^5:5‐E₅)]⁺ (M=Fe, Ru; E=P, As). [(Cp*Ru)₂As₈I₆] ( 12 ) crystallizes as a racemic mixture of both enantiomers, while [(Cp*Ru)₂As₄I₄] ( 13 ) crystallizes as a symmetric and an asymmetric isomer and features a unique tetramer of {AsI} arsinidene units as a middle deck.     

Dreiecksdodekaedrische Heterotri‐ und ‐tetrametall‐Eisen–Ruthenium‐Cluster mit CpR‐ und Pn‐Liganden (n = 5, 4)

Triangulated Dodecahedral Heterotrimetallic‐ and ‐tetrametallic Iron–Ruthenium Clusters with Cp^R and P_n Ligands (n = 5, 4) The cothermolysis of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] ( 1 ) and [{Cp″(OC)₂Ru}₂](Ru–Ru) ( 2 ), Cp″ = C₅H₃But₂‐1,3, affords low yields of [Cp″Ru(η⁵‐P₅)] ( 3 ) and [{Cp″Ru}₂P₄] ( 4 ) as well as the triangulated dodecahedral hetero‐ and homotrimetallic clusters [{Cp″Ru}₂{Cp*Fe}P₅] ( 5 ), [{Cp″Ru}₃P₅] ( 6 ), [{Cp*Fe}₂{Cp″Ru}P₅] ( 7 ) and the tetranuclear compound [{Cp″Ru}₃{Cp*Fe}P₄] ( 8 ). X‐ray crystallographic studies show that the P₅ ligand in the distorted M₂M′P₅‐triangulated dodecahedra of 5 and 7 offers an unusual novel coordination mode derived from the educt 1 .     

Niob- und Tantalkomplexe mit P2- und P4-Liganden

Niobium and Tantalum Complexes with P₂ and P₄ Ligands The photolysis of [Cp″Ta(CO)₄] 1 (Cp″ = C₅H₃^tBu₂?1,3) and P₄ affords Cp″(CO)₂Ta(η⁴?P₄) 2 , [{Cp″(CO)Ta}₂(m??η^2:2?P₂)₂] 3 and [Cp₃″(CO)₃Ta₃(P₂)₂] 4 . In a photochemical reaction 2 and [Cp*Nb(CO)₄] 5 form [{Cp*(CO)Nb}{Cp″(CO)Ta}(m??η^2:2?P₂)₂] 6 and [{Cp*(CO)₂Nb} {Cp*Nb}{Cp″(CO)Ta}(m?₃?η^2:1:1?P₂)₂] 7 , a compound with the novel m?₃?η^2:2:1?P₂-coordination mode. The reaction of 2 and [Cp*Co(C₂H₄)₂] 8 leads to [{Cp*Co} {Cp″(CO)Ta}(m??η^2:2?P₂)₂] 9 , a heteronuclear complex with an ?early”? and a ?late”? transition metal. Complexes 2, 3, 7 and 9 have been further characterized by X-ray structure analyses.     

The reaction between [η5-C5H5M(CO)3]2, η5-C5H5M(CO)3I (M  Mo,W) and isonitriles

The reaction between η⁵-C₅H₅M(CO)₃I (M  Mo, W) and isonitriles, RNC, (RNC  PhCH₂NC, t-BuNC and 2,6-dimethylphenylisocyanide (XyNC)) is catalysed by the dimer [η⁵-C₅H₅M(CO)₃]₂ (M = Mo, W) to yield η⁵-C₅H₅M(CO)_3?n(RNC)_nI (n = 1–3) and [η⁵-C₅H₅Mo(RNC)₄]I. The complexes (η⁵-C₅H₅)₂Mo₂(CO)₆?n(RNC)_n (n = 1, RNC = MeNC, PhCH₂NC, XyNC, t-BuNC; n = 2, RNC = t-BuNC) have been prepared in moderate yield from the direct reaction between [η⁵-C₅H₅Mo(CO)₃]₂ and RNC, and also catalyse the above reaction. A reaction pathway involving a fast non-chain radical mechanism and a slower chain radical mechanism is proposed to account for the catalysed reaction.     

Stabilization of Classical [B2H5]−: Structure and Bonding of [(Cp*Ta)2(B2H5)(μ‐H)L2] (Cp*=η5‐C5Me5; L=SCH2S)

The room‐temperature reaction of [Cp*TaCl₄] with LiBH₄?THF followed by addition of S₂CPPh₃ results in pentahydridodiborate species [(Cp*Ta)₂(μ,η²:η²‐B₂H₅)(μ‐H)(κ²,μ‐S₂CH₂)₂] ( 1 ), a classical [B₂H₅]^? ion stabilized by the binuclear tantalum template. Theoretical studies and bonding analysis established that the unusual stability of [B₂H₅]^? in 1 is mainly due to the stabilization of sp²‐B center by electron donation from tantalum. Reactions to replace the hydrogens attached to the diborane moiety in 1 with a 2 e {M(CO)₄} fragment (M=Mo or W) resulted in simple adducts, [{(Cp*Ta)(CH₂S₂)}₂(B₂H₅)(H){M(CO)₃}] ( 6 : M=Mo and 7 : M=W), that retained the diborane(5) unit.     

Untersuchungen zur Darstellung von [CpxSb{M(CO)5}2] (Cpx = Cp,Cp*; M = Cr,W)

Investigations of the Synthesis of [Cp^xSb{M(CO)₅}₂] (Cp^x = Cp, Cp*; M = Cr, W) The reaction of CpSbCl₂ with [Na₂{Cr₂(CO)₁₀}] leads to the chlorostibinidene complex [ClSb{Cr(CO)₅}₂(thf)] ( 1 ), whereas the reaction of CpSbCl₂ with [Na₂{W₂(CO)₁₀}] results in the formation of the complexes [ClSb{W(CO)₅}₃] ( 2 ), [Na(thf)][Cl₂Sb{W(CO)₅}₂] ( 3 ), [ClSb{W(CO)₅}₂(thf)] ( 4 ) and [Sb₂{W(CO)₅}₃] ( 5 ). The stibinidene complex [CpSb{Cr(CO)₅}₂] ( 6 ) is obtained by the reaction of [ClSb{Cr(CO)₅}₂] with NaCp, while its Cp* analogue [Cp*Sb{Cr(CO)₅}₂] ( 7 ) is formed via the metathesis of Cp*SbCl₂ with [Na₂{Cr₂(CO)₁₀}]. The products 2 , 3 , 4 and 7 are additionally characterised by X‐ray structure analyses.     

Phosphido- und arsenido-verbrückte Zweikernkomplexe: Synthese und Struktur von (η5-C5H4R)2Zr{μ-P(SiMe3)2}2M(CO)4 (R = Me,M = Cr; R = H,M = Mo) sowie die Synthese von (η5-C5H5)2Zr{μ-As(SiMe3)2}2Cr(CO)4

Phosphido- and Arsenido-bridged Dinuclear Complexes. Synthesis and Molecular Structure of (η⁵-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{μ-P(SiMe₃)₂}₂M(CO)₄ (R = Me, M = Cr; R = H, M = Mo) and Synthesis of (η⁵-C₅H₅)₂Zr{μ-As(SiMe₃)₂}₂Cr(CO)₄ The reaction of (η⁵-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{E(SiMe₃)₂}₂ with M(CO)₄(NBD) (NBD = norbornadiene) yields the dinuclear phosphido- or arsenido-bridged complexes (η⁵-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{μ-E(SiMe₃)₂}₂M(CO)₄ (R = Me, E = P, M = Cr ( 1 ); R = H, E = P, M = Mo ( 2 ); R = H, E = As, M = Cr ( 3 )). No formation of dinuclear complexes was observed in the reaction of (η⁵-C₅H₄Me)₂Zr{P(SiMe₃)₂}₂ with Ni(PEt₃)₄, Ni(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ or with NiCl₂(PPh₃)₂ in the presence of Mg. Complexes 1 – 3 were characterised spectroscopically (i. r., n. m. r., m. s.), and X-ray structure investigations were carried out on 1 and 2 . The central four-membered ZrP₂M ring is slightly puckered (dihedral angle between planes ZrP₂/CrP₂ 14.7°, ZrP₂/MoP₂ 14.2°). The Zr? P bond lengths are equivalent ( 1 : Zr? P1 2.654(4), Zr? P2 2.657(4) Å; 2 : Zr? P1 2.6711(9), Zr? P2 2.6585(7) Å), as are the M? P bond lengths (M = Cr ( 1 ): Cr? P1 2.513(4), Cr? P2 2.502(4) Å; M = Mo ( 2 ): Mo? P1 2.6263(7), Mo? P2 2.6311(10) Å). The long Zr ··· M distances of 3.414 Å (M = Cr ( 1 )) and 3.461 Å (M = Mo ( 2 )) indicate the absence of a metal-metal bond.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Heterometallic Polyhydride Complexes Containing Yttrium Hydrides with Different Cp Ligands: Synthesis,Structure, and Hydrogen‐Uptake/Release Properties

A new family of Y₄/M₂ and Y₅/M heterobimetallic rare‐earth‐metal/d‐block‐transition‐metal? polyhydride complexes has been synthesized. The reactions of the tetranuclear yttrium? octahydride complex [{Cp′′Y(μ‐H)₂}₄(thf)₄] (Cp′′=C₅Me₄H, 1‐C₅Me₄H ) with one equivalent of Group‐6‐metal? pentahydride complexes [Cp*M(PMe₃)H₅] (M=Mo, W; Cp*=C₅Me₅) afforded pentanuclear heterobimetallic Y₄/M? polyhydride complexes [{(Cp′′Y)₄(μ‐H)₇}(μ‐H)₄MCp*(PMe₃)] (M=Mo ( 2 a ), W ( 2 b )). UV irradiation of compounds 2 a , b in THF gave PMe₃‐free complexes [{(Cp′′Y)₄(μ‐H)₆(thf)₂}(μ‐H)₅MCp*] (M=Mo ( 3 a ), W ( 3 b )). Compounds 3 a , b reacted with one equivalent of [Cp*M(PMe₃)H₅] to afford hexanuclear Y₄/M₂ complexes [{Cp*M(μ‐H)₅}{(Cp′′Y)₄(μ‐H)₅}{(μ‐H)₄MCp*(PMe₃)}] (M=Mo ( 4 a ), W ( 4 b )). UV irradiation of compounds 4 a , b provided the PMe₃‐free complexes [(Cp′′Y)₄(μ‐H)₄{(μ‐H)₅MCp*}₂] (M=Mo ( 5 a ), W ( 5 b )). C₅Me₄Et‐ligated analogue [(Cp′′Y)₄(μ‐H)₄{(μ‐H)₅Mo(C₅Me₄Et)}₂] ( 5 a′ ) was obtained from the reaction of 1‐C₅Me₄H with [(C₅Me₄Et)Mo(PMe₃)H₅]. On the other hand, the reaction of pentanuclear yttrium? decahydride complex [{(C₅Me₄R)Y(μ‐H)₂}₅(thf)₂] ( 1‐C₅Me₅ : R=Me; 1‐C₅Me₄Et : R=Et) with [Cp*M(PMe₃)H₅] gave the hexanuclear heterobimetallic Y₅/M? polyhydride complexes [({(C₅Me₄R)Y}₅(μ‐H)₈)(μ‐H)₅MCp*] ( 6 a : M=Mo, R=Me; 6 a′ : M=Mo, R=Et; 6 b : M=W, R=Me). Compound 5 a released two molecules of H₂ under vacuum to give [(Cp′′Y)₄(μ‐H)₂{(μ‐H)₄MoCp*}₂] ( 7 ). In contrast, compound 6 a lost one molecule of H₂ under vacuum to yield [{(Cp*Y)₅(μ‐H)₇}(μ‐H)₄MoCp*] ( 8 ). Both compounds 7 and 8 readily reacted with H₂ to regenerate compounds 5 a and 6 a , respectively. The structures of compounds 4 a , 5 a′ , 6 a′ , 7 , and 8 were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Solvent‐Dependent Dihydrogen/Dihydride Stability for [Mo(CO)(Cp*)H2(PMe3)2]+[BF4]− Determined by Multiple Solvent⋅⋅⋅Anion⋅⋅⋅Cation Non‐Covalent Interactions

Low‐temperature (200 K) protonation of [Mo(CO)(Cp*)H(PMe₃)₂] ( 1 ) by Et₂O ? HBF₄ gives a different result depending on a subtle solvent change: The dihydrogen complex [Mo(CO)(Cp*)(η²‐H₂)(PMe₃)₂]⁺ ( 2 ) is obtained in THF, whereas the tautomeric classical dihydride [Mo(CO)(Cp*)(H)₂(PMe₃)₂]⁺ ( 3 ) is the only observable product in dichloromethane. Both products were fully characterised (ν_CO IR; ¹H, ³¹P, ¹³C NMR spectroscopies) at low temperature; they lose H₂ upon warming to 230 K at approximately the same rate (ca. 10^?3 s^?1), with no detection of the non‐classical form in CD₂Cl₂, to generate [Mo(CO)(Cp*)(FBF₃)(PMe₃)₂] ( 4 ). The latter also slowly decomposes at ambient temperature. One of the decomposition products was crystallised and identified by X‐ray crystallography as [Mo(CO)(Cp*)(FH???FBF₃)(PMe₃)₂] ( 5 ), which features a neutral HF ligand coordinated to the transition metal through the F atom and to the BF₄^? anion through a hydrogen bond. The reason for the switch in relative stability between 2 and 3 was probed by DFT calculations based on the B3LYP and M05‐2X functionals, with inclusion of anion and solvent effects by the conductor‐like polarisable continuum model and by explicit consideration of the solvent molecules. Calculations at the MP4(SDQ) and CCSD(T) levels were also carried out for calibration. The calculations reveal the key role of non‐covalent anion–solvent interactions, which modulate the anion–cation interaction ultimately altering the energetic balance between the two isomeric forms.     

Umsetzungen von Halbsandwich-Rhenium(V)-Oligochalkogenidkomplexen mit Acetylen-dicarbonsäuredimethylester. Molekülstrukturen der neuen 1,2-Dicarbomethoxy-ethen-1,2-dichalkogenat-Chelatverbindungen Cp*Re[S2C2(COOMe)2]2 und Cp*Re(NtBu)[Se2C2(COOMe)2]

Reactions of Halfsandwich Rhenium(V) Oligochalcogenide Complexes with Dimethyl Acetylene Dicarboxylate. Molecular Structures of the New 1,2-Dicarbomethoxy-ethene-1,2-dichalcogenate Chelate Compounds Cp*Re[S₂C₂(COOMe)₂]₂ and Cp*Re(N^tBu)[Se₂C₂(COOMe)₂] The reaction of Cp*Re(S₃)(S₄) ( 1a ) with dimethyl acetylene dicarboxylate (dmad) leads through the blue intermediate Cp*Re(S₄)[S₂C₂(COOMe)₂] ( 2a ) to the red bis(ethene-1,2-dithiolato) complex Cp*Re[S₂C₂(COOMe)₂]₂ ( 3a ). The product 3a is also formed in the reactions of dmad with the tetrasulfidorhenium complexes Cp*Re(L)(S₄) (L = O ( 4a ), N^tBu ( 5a )) while the analogous tetraselenidorhenium compounds Cp*Re(L)(Se₄) ( 4b and 5b ) are only transformed to Cp*Re(L)[Se₂C₂(COOMe)₂] (L = O ( 6b ), N^tBu ( 7b )). According to the X-ray crystal structure analyses, the (ethene-1,2-dithiolato)rhenium chelate rings in 3a are folded along the S …? S vector towards the Cp* ligand (angle between the planes ReS₂/S₂C₂ 159.2°), whereas the ReSe₂C₂ chelate ring in 7b is planar.