[a,b]-factorization of a graph

Let a and b be integers such that 0 ? a ? b. Then a graph G is called an [a, b]-graph if a ? d_G(x) ? b for every x ? V(G), and an [a, b]-factor of a graph is defined to be its spanning subgraph F such that a ? d_F(x) ? b for every vertex x, where d_G(x) and d_F(x) denote the degrees of x in G and F, respectively. If the edges of a graph can be decomposed into [a.b]-factors then we say that the graph is [2a, 2a]-factorable. We prove the following two theorems: (i) a graph G is [2a, 2b)-factorable if and only if G is a [2am,2bm]-graph for some integer m, and (ii) every [8m + 2k, 10m + 2k]-graph is [1,2]-factorable.     

Almost-regular factorization of graphs

For integers a and b, 0 ? a ? a ? b, an [a, b]-graph G satisties a ? deg(x, G) ? b for every vertex x of G, and an [a, b]-factor is a spanning subgraph F such that a ? deg(x, F) ? b for every vertex x of F. An [a, b]-factor is almost-regular if b = a + 1. A graph is [a, b]-factorable if its edges can be decomposed into [a, b]-factors. When both K and t are positive integers and s is a nonnegative integer, we prove that every [(12K + 2)t + 2ks, (12k + 4)t + 2ks]-graph is [2k,2k + 1]-factorable. As its corollary, we prove that every [r.r + 1]-graph with r ? 12k² + 2k is [2k + 1]-factorable, which is a partial extension of the two results, one by Thomassen and the other by Era.     

A degree condition for a graph to have [a,b]-factors

Let G be a graph of order n, and let a and b be integers such that 1 ≤ a < b. We show that G has an [a, b]-factor if δ(G) ≥ a, n ≥ 2a + b + and max {d_G(u), d_G(v) ≥ for any two nonadjacent vertices u and v in G. This result is best possible, and it is an extension of T. Iida and T. Nishimura's results (T. Iida and T. Nishimura, An Ore-type condition for the existence of k-factors in graphs, Graphs and Combinat. 7 (1991), 353–361; T. Nishimura, A degree condition for the existence of k-factors, J. Graph Theory 16 (1992), 141–151). about the existence of a k-factor. As an immediate consequence, it shows that a conjecture of M. Kano (M. Kano, Some current results and problems on factors of graphs, Proc. 3rd China–USA International Conference on Graph Theory and Its Application, Beijing (1993). about connected [a, b]-factors is incorrect. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 27: 1–6, 1998     

Connected [a,b]-factors in Graphs

In this paper, we prove the following result: Let G be a connected graph of order n, and minimum degree . Let a and b two integers such that 2a <= b. Suppose and . Then G has a connected [a,b]-factor. Received February 10, 1998/Revised July 31, 2000     

On Non-Essential Edges in 3-Connected Graphs

 An edge e in a simple 3-connected graph is deletable (simple-contractible) if the deletion G\e (contraction G/e) is both simple and 3-connected. Suppose a, b, and c are three non-negative integers. If there exists a simple 3-connected graph with exactly a edges which are deletable but not simple-contractible, exactly b edges which are simple-contractible but not deletable, and exactly c edges which are both deletable and simple-contractible, then we call the triple (a, b, c) realizable, and such a graph is said to be an (a, b, c)-graph. Tutte's Wheels Theorem says the only (0, 0, 0)-graphs are the wheels. In this paper, we characterize the (a, b, c) realizable triples for which at least one of a + b≤2, c=0, and c≥16 holds. Received: February 12, 1997 Revised: February 13, 1998     

Decomposition of Graphs into (g, f)-Factors

Let G be a multigraph, g and f be integer-valued functions defined on V(G). Then a graph G is called a (g, f)-graph if g(x)≤deg _G(x)≤f(x) for each x∈V(G), and a (g, f)-factor is a spanning (g, f)-subgraph. If the edges of graph G can be decomposed into (g, f)-factors, then we say that G is (g, f)-factorable. In this paper, we obtained some sufficient conditions for a graph to be (g, f)-factorable. One of them is the following: Let m be a positive integer, l be an integer with l=m (mod 4) and 0≤l≤3. If G is an -graph, then G is (g, f)-factorable. Our results imply several previous (g, f)-factorization results. Revised: June 11, 1998     

Packing two forests into a bipartite graph

For two integers a and b, we say that a bipartite graph G admits an (a, b)-bipartition if G has a bipartition (X, Y) such that |X| = a and |Y| = b. We say that two bipartite graphs G and H are compatible if, for some integers a and b, both G and H admit (a, b)-bipartitions. In this note, we prove that any two compatible trees of order n can be packed into a complete bipartite graph of order at most n + 1. We also provide a family of infinitely many pairs of compatible trees which cannot be packed into a complete bipartite graph of the same order. A theorem about packing two forests into a complete bipartite graph is derived from this result. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

A Neighborhood Condition for Graphs to Have [a, b]-Factors II

 Let a, b, m, and t be integers such that 1≤a<b and 1≤t≤⌉(b−m+1)/a⌉. Suppose that G is a graph of order |G| and H is any subgraph of G with the size |E(H)|=m. Then we prove that G has an [a,b]-factor containing all the edges of H if the minimum degree is at least a, |G|>((a+b)(t(a+b−1)−1)+2m)/b, and |N _G (x ₁)∪⋯ ∪N _G (x _t )|≥(a|G|+2m)/(a+b) for every independent set {x ₁,…,x _t }⊆V(G). This result is best possible in some sense and it is an extension of the result of H. Matsuda (A neighborhood condition for graphs to have [a,b]-factors, Discrete Mathematics 224 (2000) 289–292). Received: October, 2001 Final version received: September 17, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" This research was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Grant-in-Aid for Encouragement of Young Scientists, 13740084, 2001     

Stability number and [a,b]‐factors in graphs

A spanning subgraph whose vertices have degrees belonging to the interval [a,b], where a and b are positive integers, such that a ≤ b, is called an [a,b]‐factor. In this paper, we prove sufficient conditions for existence of an [a,b]‐factor, a connected [a,b]‐factor, and a 2‐connected [a,b]‐factor. The conditions involve the minimum degree, the stability number, and the connectivity of a graph. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 46: 254–264, 2004     

On the Perfect Matchings of Near Regular Graphs

Let k, h be positive integers with k ≤ h. A graph G is called a [k, h]-graph if k ≤ d(v) ≤ h for any v ? V(G){v \in V(G)}. Let G be a [k, h]-graph of order 2n such that k ≥ n. Hilton (J. Graph Theory 9:193–196, 1985) proved that G contains at least ?k/3?{\lfloor k/3\rfloor} disjoint perfect matchings if h = k. Hilton’s result had been improved by Zhang and Zhu (J. Combin. Theory, Series B, 56:74–89, 1992), they proved that G contains at least ?k/2?{\lfloor k/2\rfloor} disjoint perfect matchings if k = h. In this paper, we improve Hilton’s result from another direction, we prove that Hilton’s result is true for [k, k + 1]-graphs. Specifically, we prove that G contains at least ?\fracn3?+1+(k-n){\lfloor\frac{n}3\rfloor+1+(k-n)} disjoint perfect matchings if h = k + 1.     

Orthogonal factorizations of graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). Let k₁, k₂,…,k_m be positive integers. It is proved in this study that every [0,k₁+…+k_m?m+1]‐graph G has a [0, k_i]₁^m‐factorization orthogonal to any given subgraph H with m edges. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 40: 267–276, 2002     

Distance-Dominating Cycles in Quasi Claw-Free Graphs

We say that a graph G is quasi claw-free if every pair (a ₁, a ₂) of vertices at distance 2 satisfies {u∈N (a ₁)∩N (a ₂) | N[u]⊆N[a ₁]∪N [a ₂]}≠∅. A cycle C is m-dominating if every vertex of G is of distance at most m from C. We prove that if G is a κ-connected (κ≥2) quasi claw-free graph then either G has an m-dominating cycle or G has a set of at least κ+1 vertices such that the distance between every pair of them is at least 2m+3. Received: June 12, 1996 Revised: November 9, 1998     

Chromaticity of triangulated graphs

It is shown here that a connected graph G without subgraphs isomorphic to K₄ is triangulated if and only if its chromatic polynomial P(G,λ) equals λ(λ ? 1)^m(λ ? 2)^r for some integers m ≧ 1, r ≧ 0. This result generalizes the characterization of Two-Trees given by E.G. Whitehead [“Chromaticity of Two-Trees,” Journal of Graph Theory 9 (1985) 279–284].     

Small transversals in hypergraphs

For each positive integerk, we consider the setA _k of all ordered pairs [a, b] such that in everyk-graph withn vertices andm edges some set of at mostam+bn vertices meets all the edges. We show that eachA _k withk2 has infinitely many extreme points and conjecture that, for every positive , it has only finitely many extreme points [a, b] witha. With the extreme points ordered by the first coordinate, we identify the last two extreme points of everyA _k , identify the last three extreme points ofA ₃, and describeA ₂ completely. A by-product of our arguments is a new algorithmic proof of Turán's theorem.     

On （g, f）-Uniform Graphs

A graph G is called a (g, f)-uniform graph if for each edge of G, there is a (g, f)-factor containing it and another (g, f)-factor excluding it. In this paper a necessary and sufficient condition for a graph to be a (g, f)-uniform graph is given and some applications of this condition are discussed. In particular, some simple sufficient conditions for a graph to be an [a, b]-uniform graph are obtained for a≤b.     

Edge-maximal (k,i)-graphs

A graph G is a (k, l)-graph if for any subgraph H of G, that |V(H)| ≧ implies that k(H) ≦ k ? 1. An edge-maximal (k, l-graph G is one such that for any e ? E(G^c), G + e is not a (k, l)-graph. In [F. T. Boesch and J. A. M. McHugh, ?An Edge Extremal Result for Subcohesion,”? Journal of Combinatorial Theory B, vol. 38 (1985), pp. 1–7] a class of edge-maximal graphs was found and used to show best possible upper bounds of the size of edge-maximal (k, l)-graphs. In this paper, we investigate the lower bounds of the size of edge-maximal (k, l)-graphs. Let f(n, k, l) denote the minimum size of edge-maximal (k, l)-graphs of order n. We shall give a characterization of edge-maximal (k, l)-graphs. This characterization is used to determine f(n, k, l) and to characterize the edge-maximal (k, l)-graphs with minimum sizes, for all n ≦ k + 2 ≦ 5. Thus prior results in [F.T. Boesch and J. A. M. McHugh, op. cit.; H.-J. Lai, ?The Size of Strength-Maximal Graphs,”? Journal of Graph Theory, vol. 14 (1990), pp. 187–197] are extended.     

A degree condition for the circumference of a graph

We present a new condition on the degree sums of a graph that implies the existence of a long cycle. Let c(G) denote the length of a longest cycle in the graph G and let m be any positive integer. Suppose G is a 2-connected graph with vertices x₁,…,x_n and edge set E that satisfies the property that, for any two integers j and k with j < k, x_jx_k ? E, d(x_i) ? j and d(x_k) ? K - 1, we have (1) d(x_i) + d(x_k ? m if j + k ? n and (2) if j + k < n, either m ? n or d(x_j) + d(x_k) ? min(K + 1,m). Then c(G) ? min(m, n). This result unifies previous results of J.C. Bermond and M. Las Vergnas, respectively.     

The Clique Numbers of Regular Graphs

 Let ω(G) be the clique number of a graph G. We prove that if G runs over the set of graphs with a fixed degree sequence d, then the values ω(G) completely cover a line segment [a,b] of positive integers. For an arbitrary graphic degree sequence d, we define min(ω,d) and max(ω,d) as follows:

Extreme Geodesic Graphs

For two vertices u and v of a graph G, the closed interval I[u, v] consists of u, v, and all vertices lying in some u–v geodesic of G, while for S V(G), the set I[S] is the union of all sets I[u, v] for u, v S. A set S of vertices of G for which I[S] = V(G) is a geodetic set for G, and the minimum cardinality of a geodetic set is the geodetic number g(G). A vertex v in G is an extreme vertex if the subgraph induced by its neighborhood is complete. The number of extreme vertices in G is its extreme order ex(G). A graph G is an extreme geodesic graph if g(G) = ex(G), that is, if every vertex lies on a u–v geodesic for some pair u, v of extreme vertices. It is shown that every pair a, b of integers with 0 a b is realizable as the extreme order and geodetic number, respectively, of some graph. For positive integers r, d, and k 2, it is shown that there exists an extreme geodesic graph G of radius r, diameter d, and geodetic number k. Also, for integers n, d, and k with 2 d > n, 2 k > n, and n – d – k + 1 0, there exists a connected extreme geodesic graph G of order n, diameter d, and geodetic number k. We show that every graph of order n with geodetic number n – 1 is an extreme geodesic graph. On the other hand, for every pair k, n of integers with 2 k n – 2, there exists a connected graph of order n with geodetic number k that is not an extreme geodesic graph.     

On the difference between an integer and its m-th power mod n

For any real constants λ ₁, λ ₂ ∈ (0, 1], let $n \geqslant \max \{ [\tfrac{1} {{\lambda _1 }}],[\tfrac{1} {{\lambda _2 }}]\} $ , m ? 2 be integers. Suppose integers a ∈ [1, λ ₁ n] and b ∈ [1, λ ₂ n] satisfy the congruence b ≡ a ^m (mod n). The main purpose of this paper is to study the mean value of (a ? b)^2k for any fixed positive integer k and obtain some sharp asymptotic formulae.