Upper bounds for the perimeter of plane convex bodies

We show that the maximum total perimeter of k plane convex bodies with disjoint interiors lying inside a given convex body C is equal to $\operatorname{per}\, (C)+2(k-1)\operatorname{diam}\, (C)$ , in the case when C is a square or an arbitrary triangle. A weaker bound is obtained for general plane convex bodies. As a consequence, we establish a bound on the perimeter of a polygon with at most k reflex angles lying inside a given plane convex body.     

Upper bounds on geometric permutations for convex sets

LetA be a family ofn pairwise disjoint compact convex sets inR ^d. Let . We show that the directed lines inR ^d, d 3, can be partitioned into sets such that any two directed lines in the same set which intersect anyAA generate the same ordering onA. The directed lines inR ² can be partitioned into 12n such sets. This bounds the number of geometric permutations onA by 1/2 _d ford3 and by 6n ford=2.     

Upper bounds for independent domination in regular graphs

Let G be a regular graph of order n and degree δ. The independent domination numberi(G) is defined to be the minimum cardinality among all maximal independent sets of vertices of G. We establish upper bounds, as functions of n and δ, for the sum and product of the independent domination numbers of a regular graph and its complement.     

Upper bounds for the sum of Laplacian eigenvalues of graphs

Let G be a graph with n vertices and $e(G)$ edges, and let ${\mu }_1(G)?{\mu }_2(G)???{\mu }_n(G)=0$ be the Laplacian eigenvalues of G. Let $S_k(G)={\sum }_{i=1}^k{\mu }_i(G)$, where $1?k?n$. Brouwer conjectured that $S_k(G)?e(G)+\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{k+1}{2}\right)$ for $1?k?n$. It has been shown in Haemers et al. [7] that the conjecture is true for trees. We give upper bounds for $S_k(G)$, and in particular, we show that the conjecture is true for unicyclic and bicyclic graphs.     

Upper and lower bounds for the energy of bipartite graphs

Using Lagrange's multiplier rule, we find upper and lower bounds of the energy of a bipartite graph G, in terms of the number of vertices, edges and the spectral moment of fourth order. Moreover, the upper bound is attained in a graph G if and only if G is the graph of a symmetric balanced incomplete block design (BIBD). Also, we determine the graphs for which the lower bound is sharp.     

Upper comonotonicity and convex upper bounds for sums of random variables

It is well-known that if a random vector with given marginal distributions is comonotonic, it has the largest sum with respect to convex order. However, replacing the (unknown) copula by the comonotonic copula will in most cases not reflect reality well. For instance, in an insurance context we may have partial information about the dependence structure of different risks in the lower tail. In this paper, we extend the aforementioned result, using the concept of upper comonotonicity, to the case where the dependence structure of a random vector in the lower tail is already known. Since upper comonotonic random vectors have comonotonic behavior in the upper tail, we are able to extend several well-known results of comonotonicity to upper comonotonicity. As an application, we construct different increasing convex upper bounds for sums of random variables and compare these bounds in terms of increasing convex order.     

Upper bounds for the height of S-integral points on elliptic curves

We establish new upper bounds for the height of the S-integral points of an elliptic curve. This bound is explicitly given in terms of the set S of places of the number field K involved, but also in terms of the degree of K, as well as the rank, the regulator and the height of a basis of the Mordell–Weil group of the curve. The proof uses the elliptic analogue of Baker’s method, based on lower bounds for linear forms in elliptic logarithms.     

Lower bounds of the Laplacian spectrum of graphs based on diameter

Let G be a connected graph of order n. The diameter of G is the maximum distance between any two vertices of G. In the paper, we will give some lower bounds for the algebraic connectivity and the Laplacian spectral radius of G in terms of the diameter of G.     

Graphs of polyhedra; polyhedra as graphs

Relations between graph theory and polyhedra are presented in two contexts. In the first, the symbiotic dependence between 3-connected planar graphs and convex polyhedra is described in detail. In the second, a theory of nonconvex polyhedra is based on a graph-theoretic foundation. This approach eliminates the vagueness and inconsistency that pervade much of the literature dealing with polyhedra more general than the convex ones.     

Upper bounds for the domination subdivision and bondage numbers of graphs on topological surfaces

For a graph property P and a graph G, we define the domination subdivision number with respect to the property P to be the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (where each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to change the domination number with respect to the property P. In this paper we obtain upper bounds in terms of maximum degree and orientable/non-orientable genus for the domination subdivision number with respect to an induced-hereditary property, total domination subdivision number, bondage number with respect to an induced-hereditary property, and Roman bondage number of a graph on topological surfaces.     

Upper bounds on the upper signed total domination number of graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A function f:V→{−1,+1} defined on the vertices of G is a signed total dominating function if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least one. A signed total dominating function f is minimal if there does not exist a signed total dominating function g, f≠g, for which g(v)≤f(v) for every v∈V. The weight of a signed total dominating function is the sum of its function values over all vertices of G. The upper signed total domination number of G is the maximum weight of a minimal signed total dominating function on G. In this paper we present a sharp upper bound on the upper signed total domination number of an arbitrary graph. This result generalizes previous results for regular graphs and nearly regular graphs.     

The first order definability of graphs: Upper bounds for quantifier depth

Let D(G) denote the minimum quantifier depth of a first order sentence that defines a graph G up to isomorphism in terms of the adjacency and equality relations. Call two vertices of G similar if they have the same adjacency to any other vertex and denote the maximum number of pairwise similar vertices in G by σ(G). We prove that σ(G)+1?D(G)?max{σ(G)+2,(n+5)/2}, where n denotes the number of vertices of G. In particular, D(G)?(n+5)/2 for every G with no transposition in the automorphism group. If G is connected and has maximum degree d, we prove that for a constant . A linear lower bound for graphs of maximum degree 3 with no transposition in the automorphism group follows from an earlier result by Cai, Fürer, and Immerman [An optimal lower bound on the number of variables for graph identification, Combinatorica 12(4) (1992) 389-410]. Our upper bounds for D(G) hold true even if we allow only definitions with at most one alternation in any sequence of nested quantifiers.In passing we establish an upper bound for a related number D(G,G^′), the minimum quantifier depth of a first order sentence which is true on exactly one of graphs G and G^′. If G and G^′ are non-isomorphic and both have n vertices, then D(G,G^′)?(n+3)/2. This bound is tight up to an additive constant of 1. If we additionally require that a sentence distinguishing G and G^′ is existential, we prove only a slightly weaker bound D(G,G^′)?(n+5)/2.