Membrane interactive alpha-helices in GPCRs as a novel drug target

G-Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) are one of the most important targets for pharmaceutical drug design. Over the past 30 years, mounting evidence has suggested the existence of homo and hetero dimers or higher-order complexes (oligomers) that are involved in signal transduction and some diseases. The number of reports describing GPCR oligomerization has increased, and in 2003, the organization of mouse rhodopsin into two-dimensional arrays of dimers was determined by an atomic force microscopic analysis. The analysis of the mouse rhodopsin complex has enabled us to discuss the oligomerization based on structural data. Although many unsolved problems still remains, the idea that GPCRs directly interact to form oligomers has been gradually accepted. One of the recent findings in the GPCR investigations is the clarification of the mechanisms of GPCR oligomerization at a molecular level. Most of these studies have suggested the importance of transmembrane alpha-helices for GPCR oligomerization. In this review, we will first summarize the importance of GPCR oligomerization and the functions of GPCRs. Then, we will explain the involvement of transmembrane alpha-helices in the oligomerization and a drug design strategy that targets these regions for GPCR oligomerization. Considering the current drug design methods, which are based on the modification of the protein-protein interactions of soluble regions of proteins, a "peptide mimic approach" that targets the transmembrane alpha-helices constituting the interfaces would be promising in drug discovery for GPCR oligomerization. For that purpose, we must know the positions of the interfaces. However, problems specific to membrane proteins have made it difficult to identify the positions of the interfaces experimentally. Therefore, information about the interfaces predicted by bioinformatics approaches is valuable. At the end of this review, several bioinformatics approaches toward interface prediction for oligomerization are introduced. The benefits and the pitfalls of these approaches are also discussed.     

Latest development in drug discovery on G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the family of proteins with the highest impact from social, therapeutic and economic point of view. Today, more than 50% of drug targets are based on GPCRs and the annual worldwide sales exceeds 50 billion dollars. GPCRs are involved in all major disease areas such as cardiovascular, metabolic, neurodegenerative, psychiatric, cancer and infectious diseases. The classical drug discovery process has relied on screening compounds, which interact favorably with the GPCR of interest followed by further chemical engineering as a mean of improving efficacy and selectivity. In this review, methods for sophisticated chemical library screening procedures will be presented. Furthermore, development of cell-based assays for functional coupling of GPCRs to G proteins will be discussed. Finally, the possibility of applying structure-based drug design will be summarized. This includes the application of bioinformatics knowledge and molecular modeling approaches in drug development programs. The major efforts established through large networks of structural genomics on GPCRs, where recombinantly expressed GPCRs are subjected to purification and crystallization attempts with the intention of obtaining high-resolution structures, are presented as a promising future approach for tailor-made drug development.     

Dynamic models of G-protein coupled receptor dimers: indications of asymmetry in the rhodopsin dimer from molecular dynamics simulations in a POPC bilayer

Based on the growing evidence that G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) form homo- and hetero-oligomers, models of GPCR signaling are now considering macromolecular assemblies rather than monomers, with the homo-dimer regarded as the minimal oligomeric arrangement required for functional coupling to the G-protein. The dynamic mechanisms of such signaling assemblies are unknown. To gain some insight into properties of GPCR dimers that may be relevant to functional mechanisms, we study their current structural prototype, rhodopsin. We have carried out nanosecond time-scale molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a rhodopsin dimer and compared the results to the monomer simulated in the same type of bilayer membrane model composed of an equilibrated unit cell of hydrated palmitoyl-oleoyl-phosphatidyl choline (POPC). The dynamic representation of the homo-dimer reveals the location of structural changes in several regions of the monomeric subunits. These changes appear to be more pronounced at the dimerization interface that had been shown to be involved in the activation process [Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:17495, 2005]. The results are consistent with a model of GPCR activation that involves allosteric modulation through a single GPCR subunit per dimer.     

A Usual G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor in Unusual Membranes

G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane‐bound receptors and constitute about 50 % of all known drug targets. They offer great potential for membrane protein nanotechnologies. We report here a charge‐interaction‐directed reconstitution mechanism that induces spontaneous insertion of bovine rhodopsin, the eukaryotic GPCR, into both lipid‐ and polymer‐based artificial membranes. We reveal a new allosteric mode of rhodopsin activation incurred by the non‐biological membranes: the cationic membrane drives a transition from the inactive MI to the activated MII state in the absence of high [H⁺] or negative spontaneous curvature. We attribute this activation to the attractive charge interaction between the membrane surface and the deprotonated Glu134 residue of the rhodopsin‐conserved ERY sequence motif that helps break the cytoplasmic “ionic lock”. This study unveils a novel design concept of non‐biological membranes to reconstitute and harness GPCR functions in synthetic systems.     

Structural determinants of the supramolecular organization of G protein-coupled receptors in bilayers

The G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) rhodopsin self-assembles into supramolecular structures in native bilayers, but the structural determinants of receptor oligomerization are not known. We carried out multiple self-assembly coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CGMD) simulations of model membranes containing up to 64 molecules of the visual receptor rhodopsin over time scales reaching 100 μs. The simulations show strong preferential interaction modes between receptors. Two primary modes of receptor-receptor interactions are consistent with umbrella sampling/potential of mean force (PMF) calculations as a function of the distance between a pair of receptors. The preferential interfaces, involving helices (H) 1/8, 4/5 and 5, present no energy barrier to forming a very stable receptor dimer. Most notably, the PMFs show that the preferred rhodopsin dimer exists in a tail-to-tail conformation, with the interface comprising transmembrane H1/H2 and amphipathic H8 at the extracellular and cytoplasmic surfaces, respectively. This dimer orientation is in line with earlier electron microscopy, X-ray, and cross-linking experiments of rhodopsin and other GPCRs. Less stable interfaces, involving H4 and H6, have a free energy barrier for desolvation (delipidation) of the interfaces and appear to be designed to stabilize "lubricated" (i.e., lipid-coated) dimers. The overall CGMD strategy used here is general and can be applied to study the homo- and heterodimerization of GPCRs and other transmembrane proteins. Systematic extension of the work will deepen our understanding of the forces involved in the membrane organization of integral membrane proteins.     

Comparative Analysis of GPCR Crystal Structures†

The phototransduction cascade is perhaps the best understood model system for G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. Phototransduction links the absorption of a single photon of light to a decrease in cytosolic cGMP. Depletion of the cGMP pool induces closure of cGMP‐gated cation channels resulting in the hyperpolarization of photoreceptor cells and consequently a neuronal response. Many biochemical and both low‐ and high‐resolution structural approaches have been utilized to increase our understanding of rhodopsin, the key molecule of this signaling cascade. Rhodopsin, a member of the GPCR or seven‐transmembrane spanning receptor superfamily, is composed of a chromophore, 11‐cis‐retinal that is covalently bound by a protonated Schiff base linkage to the apo‐protein opsin at Lys²⁹⁶ (in bovine opsin). Upon absorption of a photon, isomerization of the chromophore to an all‐trans‐retinylidene conformation induces changes in the rhodopsin structure, ultimately converting it from an inactive to an activated state. This state allows it to activate the heterotrimeric G protein, transducin, by triggering nucleotide exchange. To fully understand the structural and functional aspects of rhodopsin it is necessary to critically examine crystal structures of its different photointermediates. In this review we summarize recent progress on the structure and activation of rhodopsin in the context of other GPCR structures.     

Highly Selective Separation of Rhodopsin from Bovine Rod Outer Segment Membranes Using Combination of Divalent Cation and Alkyl(thio)glucoside

The micellization process of bovine rod outer segment (ROS) membranes is investigated utilizing a series of neutral detergents. It is found that when alkyl(thio)glucosides with an appropriate hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (e.g. octylthioglucoside) are used in combination with a divalent cation, rhodopsin is selectively extracted from ROS membranes at a specific detergent-to-membrane ratio. This allows remarkable purification of rhodopsin by a single-step solubilization, because the residual membranes are heavily aggregated in the presence of divalent cation and are therefore easily sedimented by low-speed centrifugation. The absorption spectrum of the supernatant reproducibly exhibits an A₂₈₀/A₅₀₀ value of 1.6, an excellent value that could rarely be obtained by chromatographic purification. The degree of purification also depends on the type of divalent cation included in the solubilization solution; specific binding of IIB-series cations (Zn²⁺ and Cd²⁺) to ROS membranes is suggested to play an important role in the solubilization process. The present result represents a unique example of selective solubilization of a specific membrane protein from highly aggregated membranes.     

BUNDLE: A program for building the transmembrane domains of G-protein-coupled receptors

The only information available at present about the structural features of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comes from low resolution electron density maps of rhodopsin obtained from electron microscopy studies on 2D crystals. Despite their low resolution, maps can be used to extract information about transmembrane helix relative positions and their tilt. This information, together with a reliable algorithm to assess the residues involved in each of the membrane spanning regions, can be used to construct a 3D model of the transmembrane domains of rhodopsin at atomic resolution. In the present work, we describe an automated procedure applicable to generate such a model and, in general, to construct a 3D model of any given GPCR with the only assumption that it adopts the same helix arrangement as in rhodopsin. The present approach avoids uncertainties associated with other procedures available for constructing models of GPCRs based on a template, since sequence identity among GPCRs of different families in most of the cases is not significant. The steps involved in the construction of the model are: (i) locate the centers of the helices according to the low-resolution electron density map; (ii) compute the tilt of each helix based on the elliptical shape observed by each helix in the map; (iii) define a local coordinate system for each of the helices; (iv) bring them together in an antiparallel orientation; (v) rotate each helix through the helical axis in such a way that its hydrophobic moment points in the same direction of the bisector formed between three consecutive helices in the bundle; (vi) rotate each helix through an axis perpendicular to the helical one to assign a proper tilt; and (vii) translate each helix to its center deduced from the projection map.     

Key issues in the computational simulation of GPCR function: representation of loop domains

Some key concerns raised by molecular modeling and computational simulation of functional mechanisms for membrane proteins are discussed and illustrated for members of the family of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Of particular importance are issues related to the modeling and computational treatment of loop regions. These are demonstrated here with results from different levels of computational simulations applied to the structures of rhodopsin and a model of the 5-HT2A serotonin receptor, 5-HT2AR. First, comparative Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations are reported for rhodopsin in vacuum and embedded in an explicit representation of the membrane and water environment. It is shown that in spite of a partial accounting of solvent screening effects by neutralization of charged side chains, vacuum MD simulations can lead to severe distortions of the loop structures. The primary source of the distortion appears to be formation of artifactual H-bonds, as has been repeatedly observed in vacuum simulations. To address such shortcomings, a recently proposed approach that has been developed for calculating the structure of segments that connect elements of secondary structure with known coordinates, is applied to 5-HT2AR to obtain an initial representation of the loops connecting the transmembrane (TM) helices. The approach consists of a simulated annealing combined with biased scaled collective variables Monte Carlo technique, and is applied to loops connecting the TM segments on both the extra-cellular and the cytoplasmic sides of the receptor. Although this initial calculation treats the loops as independent structural entities, the final structure exhibits a number of interloop interactions that may have functional significance. Finally, it is shown here that in the case where a given loop from two different GPCRs (here rhodopsin and 5-HT2AR) has approximately the same length and some degree of sequence identity, the fold adopted by the loops can be similar. Thus, in such special cases homology modeling might be used to obtain initial structures of these loops. Notably, however, all other loops in these two receptors appear to be very different in sequence and structure, so that their conformations can be found reliably only by ab initio, energy based methods and not by homology modeling.     

Molecular modeling of A1 and A2A adenosine receptors: comparison of rhodopsin- and beta2-adrenergic-based homology models through the docking studies

Adenosine receptors (ARs) are members of the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. The homology models of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors were constructed. The high-resolution X-ray structure of bovine rhodopsin and crystal structure of beta2-adrenergic receptor were used as templates. The binding sites of the A1 and A2A ARs were constructed by using data obtained from mutagenesis experiments as well as docking simulations of the respective AR antagonsists DPCPX and XAC. To compare rhodopsin- and beta2-adrenergic-based models, the binding mode of A1 (KW-3902, LUF-5437) and A2A (KW-6002, ZM-241385) ARs antagonists were also examined. The differences in the binding ability of both models were noted during the study. The beta2-adrenergic-based A2A AR model was much more capable to stabilize the ligand in the binding site cavity than the corresponding rhodopsin-based A2A AR model, however, such differences were not so clear in case of A1 AR models. It was suggested that for the A1 AR it is possible to use the crystal structure of rhodopsin as a template as well as beta2-adrenergic receptor, but for A2A AR, with the now available beta2-adrenergic receptor X-ray structure, docking studies should be avoided on the rhodopsin-based model. However, taking into account that the beta2AR shares about 31% of the residues with the AR in comparison to 21% in case of bRho, we suggest using beta2-adrenergic-based models for the A1 and A2A ARs for further in silico ligand screening also because of their generally better ability to stabilize ligands inside the binding pocket.     

Reconstitution of rhodopsin into polymerizable planar supported lipid bilayers: influence of dienoyl monomer structure on photoactivation

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play key roles in cellular signal transduction and many are pharmacologically important targets for drug discovery. GPCRs can be reconstituted in planar supported lipid bilayers (PSLBs) with retention of activity, which has led to development of GPCR-based biosensors and biochips. However, PSLBs composed of natural lipids lack the high stability desired for many technological applications. One strategy is to use synthetic lipid monomers that can be polymerized to form robust bilayers. A key question is how lipid polymerization affects GPCR structure and activity. Here we have investigated the photochemical activity of bovine rhodopsin (Rho), a model GPCR, reconstituted into PSLBs composed of lipids having one or two polymerizable dienoyl moieties located in different regions of the acyl chains. Plasmon waveguide resonance spectroscopy was used to compare the degree of Rho photoactivation in fluid and poly(lipid) PSLBs. The position of the dienoyl moiety was found to have a significant effect: polymerization near the glycerol backbone significantly attenuates Rho activity whereas polymerization near the acyl chain termini does not. Differences in cross-link density near the acyl chain termini also do not affect Rho activity. In unpolymerized PSLBs, an equimolar mixture of phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine (PC) lipids enhances activity relative to pure PC; however after polymerization, the enhancement is eliminated which is attributed to stabilization of the membrane lamellar phase. These results should provide guidance for the design of robust lipid bilayers functionalized with transmembrane proteins for use in membrane-based biochips and biosensors.     

Inhibitory G proteins and their receptors: emerging therapeutic targets for obesity and diabetes

The worldwide prevalence of obesity is steadily increasing, nearly doubling between 1980 and 2008. Obesity is often associated with insulin resistance, a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): a costly chronic disease and serious public health problem. The underlying cause of T2DM is a failure of the beta cells of the pancreas to continue to produce enough insulin to counteract insulin resistance. Most current T2DM therapeutics do not prevent continued loss of insulin secretion capacity, and those that do have the potential to preserve beta cell mass and function are not effective in all patients. Therefore, developing new methods for preventing and treating obesity and T2DM is very timely and of great significance. There is now considerable literature demonstrating a link between inhibitory guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein) and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling in insulin-responsive tissues and the pathogenesis of obesity and T2DM. These studies are suggesting new and emerging therapeutic targets for these conditions. In this review, we will discuss inhibitory G proteins and GPCRs that have primary actions in the beta cell and other peripheral sites as therapeutic targets for obesity and T2DM, improving satiety, insulin resistance and/or beta cell biology.     

Atomistic insights into rhodopsin activation from a dynamic model

Rhodopsin, the light sensitive receptor responsible for blue-green vision, serves as a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Upon light absorption, it undergoes a series of conformational changes that lead to the active form, metarhodopsin II (META II), initiating a signaling cascade through binding to the G protein transducin (G(t)). Here, we first develop a structural model of META II by applying experimental distance restraints to the structure of lumi-rhodopsin (LUMI), an earlier intermediate. The restraints are imposed by using a combination of biased molecular dynamics simulations and perturbations to an elastic network model. We characterize the motions of the transmembrane helices in the LUMI-to-META II transition and the rearrangement of interhelical hydrogen bonds. We then simulate rhodopsin activation in a dynamic model to study the path leading from LUMI to our META II model for wild-type rhodopsin and a series of mutants. The simulations show a strong correlation between the transition dynamics and the pharmacological phenotypes of the mutants. These results help identify the molecular mechanisms of activation in both wild type and mutant rhodopsin. While static models can provide insights into the mechanisms of ligand recognition and predict ligand affinity, a dynamic model of activation could be applicable to study the pharmacology of other GPCRs and their ligands, offering a key to predictions of basal activity and ligand efficacy.     

Modeling activated states of GPCRs: the rhodopsin template

Activation of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) is an allosteric mechanism triggered by ligand binding and resulting in conformational changes transduced by the transmembrane domain. Models of the activated forms of GPCRs have become increasingly necessary for the development of a clear understanding of signal propagation into the cell. Experimental evidence points to a multiplicity of conformations related to the activation of the receptor, rendered important physiologically by the suggestion that different conformations may be responsible for coupling to different signaling pathways. In contrast to the inactive state of rhodopsin (RHO) for which several high quality X-ray structures are available, the structure-related information for the active states of rhodopsin and all other GPCRs is indirect. We have collected and stored such information in a repository we maintain for activation-specific structural data available for rhodopsin-like GPCRs, . Using these data as structural constraints, we have applied Simulated Annealing Molecular Dynamics to construct a number of different active state models of RHO starting from the known inactive structure. The common features of the models indicate that TM3 and TM5 play an important role in activation, in addition to the well-established rearrangement of TM6. Some of the structural changes observed in these models occur in regions that were not involved in the constraints, and have not been previously tested experimentally; they emerge as interesting candidates for further experimental exploration of the conformational space of activated GPCRs. We show that none of the normal modes calculated from the inactive structure has a dominant contribution along the path of conformational rearrangement from inactive to the active forms of RHO in the models. This result may differentiate rhodopsin from other GPCRs, and the reasons for this difference are discussed in the context of the structural properties and the physiological function of the protein. Electronic supplementary material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at and is accessible for authorized users. An erratum to this article can be found at     

Molecular dynamics simulations and structure-based network analysis reveal structural and functional aspects of G-protein coupled receptor dimer interactions

A significant amount of experimental evidence suggests that G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) do not act exclusively as monomers but also form biologically relevant dimers and oligomers. However, the structural determinants, stoichiometry and functional importance of GPCR oligomerization remain topics of intense speculation. In this study we attempted to evaluate the nature and dynamics of GPCR oligomeric interactions. A representative set of GPCR homodimers were studied through Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics simulations, combined with interface analysis and concepts from network theory for the construction and analysis of dynamic structural networks. Our results highlight important structural determinants that seem to govern receptor dimer interactions. A conserved dynamic behavior was observed among different GPCRs, including receptors belonging in different GPCR classes. Specific GPCR regions were highlighted as the core of the interfaces. Finally, correlations of motion were observed between parts of the dimer interface and GPCR segments participating in ligand binding and receptor activation, suggesting the existence of mechanisms through which dimer formation may affect GPCR function. The results of this study can be used to drive experiments aimed at exploring GPCR oligomerization, as well as in the study of transmembrane protein–protein interactions in general.     

New strategies in drug discovery for GPCRs: high throughput detection of cellular ERK phosphorylation

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of receptors for a wide range of stimulants, including hormones, neurotransmitters, and taste and olfactory chemicals. Due to their broad involvement in cellular responses, GPCRs affect many important body functions both in health and disease. Compared to other receptor families, the GPCRs have been a rich source of extracellularly-acting pharmaceuticals, due largely to the fact that many GPCR ligands are small molecules when compared with ligands for other receptors, such as the tyrosine kinase receptor family. This has allowed the development of small molecule modulators of receptor function that act on specific GPCRs, such as those involved in cardiovascular regulation. However, at several levels, current screening technologies of drug development for GPCRs are lacking. Firstly, responses from many GPCRs, such as the Gi-coupled GPCRs, are not easily measured in large screening programs by current techniques. Secondly, there are few options for detecting agonists of orphan GPCRs. Thirdly, it is now clear that the signaling from GPCRs is more complex than once thought, and the measurement of Ca(2+) and cAMP can account for only a fraction of the biological information emanating from an activated GPCR. Studies of the discrete and sometimes separable activation of the Ras/Raf/Mek/ERK cascade by many GPCRs is likely to offer development of new agonists and antagonists, contribute to new pharmacologies from receptors, and raise the potential for novel drug candidates in this important area of biology. Downstream activation of the ERK pathway, with or without transactivation of growth factor receptors, has not been measurable by high throughput methodologies. This article presents recent advances and associated applications for screening of GPCRs and other receptor species through the rapid measurement of protein phosphorylation events, such as ERK phosphorylation, as new readouts for drug discovery.     

Comparison of G-protein coupled receptor desensitization-related beta-arrestin redistribution using confocal and non-confocal imaging

High Content Screening (HCS), a combination of fluorescence microscopic imaging and automated image analysis, has become a frequently applied tool to study test compound effects in cellular disease-modelling systems. In this work, we compared a confocal and a non-confocal cellular HCS system, the IN Cell Analyzers(1) 3,000 and 1,000, respectively. As a cellular model system we used the Transfluor technology in the 384-well microtiter plate (MTP) format. The Transfluor HCS assay for G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) activation is based on the recruitment of a green fluorescent protein-labelled arrestin (ArrGFP) from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. We investigated two GPCRs, the wild-type (wt) beta2 adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) and the beta2AR-enhanced (E), a C-terminally mutated receptor with a higher affinity to arrestin. Upon agonist stimulation, the beta2AR-wt induced the redistribution of ArrGFP to coated pits, the beta2AR-E maintained the interaction with ArrGFP down to the formation of endocytic vesicles. Our findings reveal that the assay is feasible on both instruments, with sufficiently robust Z' statistics. Improved Z' statistics, though, are achieved with the confocal system, particularly in case of weak signals. Moreover, throughput is dramatically higher for the IN Cell Analyzer 3,000. We conclude that, depending on the needs for throughput and assay biology, either instrument may fulfil a successful role in the drug discovery process. Confocal optics, however, provide a better basis for the detection of smaller subcellular structures with lower fluorescence intensity.     

Solid-state NMR evidence for a protonation switch in the binding pocket of the H1 receptor upon binding of the agonist histamine

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a major superfamily of transmembrane receptor proteins that are crucial in cellular signaling and are major pharmacological targets. While the activity of GPCRs can be modulated by agonist binding, the mechanisms that link agonist binding to G protein coupling are poorly understood. Here we present a method to accurately examine the activity of ligands in their bound state, even at low affinity, by solid-state NMR dipolar correlation spectroscopy and confront this method with the human H1 receptor. The analysis reveals two different charge states of the bound agonist, dicationic with a charged imidazole ring and monocationic with a neutral imidazole ring, with the same overall conformation. The combination of charge difference and pronounced heterogeneity agrees with converging evidence that the active and inactive states of the GPCR represent a dynamic equilibrium of substates and that proton transfer between agonist and protein side chains can shift this equilibrium by stabilizing the active receptor population relative to the inactive one. In fact, the data suggest a global functional analogy between H1 receptor activation and the meta I/meta II charge/discharge equilibrium in rhodopsin (GPCR). This corroborates current ideas on unifying principles in GPCR structure and function.     

Structural Insights into Ligand—Receptor Interactions Involved in Biased Agonism of G-Protein Coupled Receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are versatile signaling proteins that mediate complex cellular responses to hormones and neurotransmitters. Ligand directed signaling is observed when agonists, upon binding to the same receptor, trigger significantly different configuration of intracellular events. The current work reviews the structurally defined ligand – receptor interactions that can be related to specific molecular mechanisms of ligand directed signaling across different receptors belonging to class A of GPCRs. Recent advances in GPCR structural biology allow for mapping receptors’ binding sites with residues particularly important in recognition of ligands’ structural features that are responsible for biased signaling. Various studies show particular role of specific residues lining the extended ligand binding domains, biased agonists may alternatively affect their interhelical interactions and flexibility what can be translated into intracellular loop rearrangements. Studies on opioid and angiotensin receptors indicate importance of residues located deeper within the binding cavity and direct interactions with receptor residues linking the ortosteric ligand binding site with the intracellular transducer binding domain. Collection of results across different receptors may suggest elements of common molecular mechanisms which are responsible for passing alternative signals from biased agonists.     

Structural genomics on membrane proteins: mini review

Structural genomics, structure-based analysis of gene products, has so far mainly concentrated on soluble proteins because of their less demanding requirements for overexpression, purification and crystallisation compared to membrane proteins. This so-called "low-hanging fruit" approach has generated more than 25,000 structures deposited in databases. In contrast, the substantially more complex membrane proteins, in relation to all steps from overexpression to high-resolution structure determination, represent less than 1% of available crystal structures. This is in sharp contrast to the importance of this type of proteins, particularly G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), as today 60-70% of the current drug targets are based on membrane proteins. The key to improved success with membrane protein structural elucidation is technology development. The most efficient approach constitutes parallel studies on a large number of targets and evaluation of various systems for expression. Next, high throughput format solubilisation and refolding screening methods for a wide range of detergents and additives in numerous concentrations should be established. Today, several networks dealing with structural genomics approaches of membrane proteins have been initiated, among them the Membrane Protein Network (MePNet) programme that deals with the pharmaceutically important mammalian GPCRs. In MePNet, three overexpression systems have been employed for the evaluation of 101 GPCRs, which has generated large quantities of numerous recombinant GPCRs, compatible for structural biology applications.