Syntheses and Structures of Facial and Meridional Stereoisomers of κ2-N,S-Chelated Ruthenium Borate Complexes

The trans-mer-[(κ²-N,S-NS₂C₇H₄)PR₃Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-H₂B (NS₂C₇H₄)₂}], (trans-mer -1 a : R=Cy; trans-mer -1 b : R=Ph) complexes are kinetically controlled products that upon thermolysis led to the formation of cis-mer-[(κ²-N,S-NS₂C₇H₄)PR₃Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-H₂B(NS₂C₇H₄)₂}], (cis-mer- 2 a : R=Cy; cis-mer- 2 b : R=Ph) and cis-fac-[(κ²-N,S-NS₂C₇H₄)PR₃Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-H₂B(NS₂C₇H₄)₂}], (cis-fac- 3 a : R=Cy; cis-fac- 3 b : R=Ph) along with complex cis-[(κ²-N,S-NS₂C₇H₄)₂Ru(PPh₃)₂], (cis- 4 ). One of the main intentions of this study was to examine the flexibility of the borate and hemilabile N,S-chelating mercapto-benzothiazole ligands in adapting different spatial arrangements around metal center. Multinuclear spectroscopic analyses have been done to characterize all new complexes and the structures were further confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Further, Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations were performed to provide an insight into the bonding of the complexes.     

Metal/Metal Redox Isomerism Governed by Configuration

A pair of diastereomeric dinuclear complexes, [Tp′(CO)BrW{μ-η²-C,C′-κ²-S,P-C₂(PPh₂)S}Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(PPh₃)], in which W and Ru are bridged by a phosphinyl(thiolato)alkyne in a side-on carbon P,S-chelate coordination mode, were synthesized, separated and fully characterized. Even though the isomers are similar in their spectroscopic properties and redox potentials, the like-isomer is oxidized at W while the unlike-isomer is oxidized at Ru, which is proven by IR, NIR and EPR-spectroscopy supported by spectro-electrochemistry and computational methods. The second oxidation of the complexes was shown to take place at the metal left unaffected in the first redox step. Finally, the tipping point could be realized in the unlike isomer of the electronically tuned thiophenolate congener [Tp′(CO)(PhS)W{μ-η²-C,C′-κ²-S,P-C₂(PPh₂)S}Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)-(PPh₃)], in which valence trapped W^III/Ru^II and W^II/Ru^III cationic species are at equilibrium.     

Five-Membered Ruthenacycles: Ligand-Assisted Alkyne Insertion into 1,3-N,S-Chelated Ruthenium Borate Species

Building upon previous work, the chemistry of [(η⁶-p-cymene)Ru{P(OMe)₂OR}Cl₂], (R=H or Me) has been extended with [H₂B(mbz)₂]⁻ (mbz=2-mercaptobenzothiazolyl) using different Ru precursors and borate ligands. As a result, a series of 1,3-N,S-chelated ruthenium borate complexes, for example, [(κ²-N,S-L)PR₃Ru{κ³-H,S,S’−H₂B(L)₂}], ( 2 a – d and 2 a’ – d’ ; R=Ph, Cy, OMe or OPh and L=C₅H₄NS or C₇H₄NS₂) and [Ru{κ³-H,S,S’-H₂B(L)₂}₂], ( 3 : L=C₅H₄NS, 3’ : L=C₇H₄NS₂) were isolated upon treatment of [(η⁶-p-cymene)RuCl₂PR₃], 1 a – d (R=Ph, Cy, OMe or OPh) with [H₂B(mp)₂]⁻ or [H₂B(mbz)₂]⁻ ligands (mp=2-mercaptopyridyl). All the Ru borate complexes, 2 a – d and 2 a’ – d’ are stabilized by phosphine/phosphite and hemilabile N,S-chelating ligands. Treatment of these Ru borate species, 2 a’ – c’ with various terminal alkynes yielded two different types of five-membered ruthenacycle species, namely [PR₃{C₇H₄S₂-(E)-N-C=CH(R ’ )}Ru{κ³-H,S,S ’ −H₂B(L)₂}], ( 4 – 4’ ; R=Ph and R ’ =CO₂Me or C₆H₄NO₂; L=C₇H₄NS₂) and [PR₃{C₇H₄NS-(E)-S-C=CH(R ’ )}Ru{κ³-H,S,S ’ −H₂B(L)₂}], ( 5 – 5’ , 6 and 7 ; R=Ph, Cy or OMe and R ’ =CO₂Me or C₆H₄NO₂; L=C₇H₄NS₂). All these five-membered ruthenacycle species contain an exocyclic C=C moiety, presumably formed by the insertion of a terminal alkyne into the Ru−N and Ru−S bonds. The new species have been characterized spectroscopically and the structures were further confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Theoretical studies and chemical-bonding analyses established that charge transfer occurs from phosphorus to ruthenium center following the trend PCy₃<PPh₃<P(OPh)₃<P(OMe)₃.     

Syntheses,characterization, and crystal structures of ruthenium(II)/(III) complexes with tridentate salicylaldiminato ligands

Treatment of [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] with one equivalent of tridentate Schiff base 2-[(2-dimethylamino-ethylimino)-methyl]-phenol (HL) in the presence of triethylamine afforded a ruthenium(III) complex [RuCl₃(κ²-N,N-NH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂)(PPh₃)] as a result of decomposition of HL. Interaction of HL and one equivalent of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃], [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂] or [Ru(tht)₄Cl₂] (tht = tetrahydrothiophene) under different conditions led to isolation of the corresponding ruthenium(II) complexes [RuCl(κ³-N,N,O-L)(CO)(PPh₃)] (2), [RuCl(κ³-N,N,O-L)(CO)₂] (3), and a ruthenium(III) complex [RuCl₂(κ³-N,N,O-L)(tht)] (4), respectively. Molecular structures of 1·CH₂Cl₂, 2·CH₂Cl₂, 3 and 4 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Synthesis and structural characterization of ruthenium complexes with 1-aryl-imidazole-2-thione

Treatment of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] with 2 equiv. Himt^MPh (Himt^MPh?=?1-(4-methyl-phenyl)-imidazole-2-thione) in the presence of MeONa afforded cis-[Ru(κ ²-S,N-imt^MPh)₂(PPh₃)₂] (1), while interaction of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] and 2 equiv. Himt^MPh in tetrahydrofuran (THF) without base gave [RuCl₂(κ ¹-S-Himt^MPh)₂(PPh₃)₂] (2). Treatment of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with 1 equiv. Himt^MPh in THF gave [RuHCl(κ ¹-S-Himt^MPh)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (3), whereas reaction of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with 1 equiv. of the deprotonated [imt^MPh]^? or [imt^NPh]^? (imt^NPh?=?1-(4-nitro-phenyl)-2-mercaptoimidazolyl) gave [RuH(κ ²-S,N-imt^RPh)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (R?=?M 4a, R?=?N 4b). The ruthenium hydride complexes 4a and 4b easily convert to their corresponding ruthenium chloride complexes [RuCl(κ ²-S,N-imt^MPh)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (5a) and [RuCl(κ ²-S,N-imt^NPh)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (5b), respectively, in refluxing CHCl₃ by chloride substitution of the RuH. Photolysis of 5a in CHCl₃ at room temperature afforded an oxidized product [RuCl₂(κ ²-S,N-imt^MPh)(PPh₃)₂] (6). Reaction of 6 with excess [imt^MPh]^? afforded 1. The molecular structures of 1·EtOH, 3·C₆H₁₄, 4b·0.25CH₃COCH₃, and 6·2CH₂Cl₂ have been determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography.     

Alcohol oxidation reactions catalyzed by ruthenium–carbonyl complexes of thioarylazoimidazoles

Alcohols are oxidized by N‐methylmorpholine‐N‐oxide (NMO), Bu^tOOH and H₂O₂ to the corresponding aldehydes or ketones in the presence of catalyst, [RuH(CO)(PPh₃)₂(SRaaiNR′)]PF₆ ( 2 ) and [RuCl(CO)(PPh₃)(S_κRaaiNR′)]PF₆ ( 3 ) (SRaaiNR′ ( 1 ) = 1‐alkyl‐2‐{(o‐thioalkyl)phenylazo}imidazole, a bidentate N(imidazolyl) (N), N(azo) (N′) chelator and S_κRaaiNR′ is a tridentate N(imidazolyl) (N), N(azo) (N′), S_κ‐R is tridentate chelator; R and R′ are Me and Et). The single‐crystal X‐ray structures of [RuH(CO)(PPh₃)₂(SMeaaiNMe)]PF₆ ( 2a ) (SMeaaiNMe = 1‐methyl‐2‐{(o‐thioethyl)phenylazo}imidazole) and [RuH(CO)(PPh₃)₂(SEtaaiNEt)]PF₆ ( 2b ) (SEtaaiNEt = 1‐ethyl‐2‐{(o‐thioethyl)phenylazo}imidazole) show bidentate N,N′ chelation, while in [RuCl(CO)(PPh₃)(S_κEtaaiNEt)]PF₆ ( 3b ) the ligand S_κEtaaiNEt serves as tridentate N,N′,S chelator. The cyclic voltammogram shows Ru^III/Ru^II (~1.1 V) and Ru^IV/Ru^III (~1.7 V) couples of the complexes 2 while Ru^III/Ru^II (1.26 V) couple is observed only in 3 along with azo reductions in the potential window +2.0 to ?2.0 V. DFT computation has been used to explain the spectra and redox properties of the complexes. In the oxidation reaction NMO acts as best oxidant and [RuCl(CO)(PPh₃)(S_κRaaiNR′)](PF₆) ( 3 ) is the best catalyst. The formation of high‐valent Ru^IV=O species as a catalytic intermediate is proposed for the oxidation process. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

单氢钌配合物与水和2,2,2-三氟乙醇的作用机理

利用原位¹H和³¹P NMR对单氢钌配合物TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)H [Tp＝hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate]与H₂O和酸性HOCH₂CF₃的反应进行了研究, 结果显示相应的反应产物分别是TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)(OH) 和TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)(OCH₂CF₃). 观察到反应过程中Ru-H…HOH和Ru-H…HOCH₂CF₃分子间的氢键作用. 提出了生成TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)(OH)和TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)(OCH₂CF₃)的不同作用机理. 在水存在下, TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)H 与H₂O反应, 经过中间体TpRu(PPh₃)(H₂O)H和TpRu(PPh₃)(OH)(η²-H₂)生成产物TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)(OH). 而TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)H与酸性HOCH₂CF₃反应时, 单氢配体被质子化形成中间体[TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)- (η²-H₂)](OCH₂CF₃), 进而转变成产物TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)(OCH₂CF₃). TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)(OCH₂CF₃)与H₂作用, 经中间体TpRu(PPh₃)(HOCH₂CF₃)H生成TpRu(PPh₃)(η²-H₂)H.     

Ruthenium NNN complexes with a 2‐hydroxypyridylmethylene fragment for transfer hydrogenation of ketones

Four NNN tridentate ligands L₁–L₄ containing 2‐methoxypyridylmethene or 2‐hydroxypyridylmethene fragment were synthesized and introduced to ruthenium centers. When (HOC₅H₃NCH₂C₅H₃NC₅H₇N₂) (L₂) and (HOC₅H₃NCH₂C₅H₃NC₆H₆N₃) (L₄) reacted with RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃, two ruthenium chloride products Ru(L₂)(PPh₃)Cl₂ ( 1 ) and Ru(L₄)(PPh₃)Cl₂ ( 2 ) were isolated, respectively. Reactions of (MeOC₅H₃NCH₂C₅H₃NC₅H₇N₂) (L₁) and (MeOC₅H₃NCH₂C₅H₃NC₆H₆N₃) (L₃) with RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ in the presence of NH₄PF₆ generated two dicationic complexes [Ru(L₁)₂][PF₆]₂ ( 3 ) and [Ru(L₃)₂][PF₆]₂ ( 4 ), respectively. Complex 1 reacted with CO to afford product [Ru(L₂)(PPh₃)(CO)Cl][Cl]. The catalytic activity for transfer hydrogenation of ketones was investigated. Complex 1 showed the highest activity, with a turnover frequency value of 1.44 × 10³ h^?1 for acetophenone, while complexes 3 and 4 were not active.     

Ruthenium(II) complexes of aroylhydrazones: structural,electrochemical and electrostatic interactions with DNA

Four Ru(II) complexes with tridentate ligands viz. (4-hydroxy-N′-(pyridin-2-yl-ethylene) benzohydrazide [Ru(L¹)(PPh₃)₂(Cl)] (1), N′-(pyridin-2-yl-methylene) nicotinohydrazide [Ru(L²)(PPh₃)₂(Cl)] (2), N′-(1H-imidazol-2-yl-methylene)-4-hydroxybenzohydrazide [Ru(L³)(PPh₃)₂(Cl)] (3), and N′-(1H-imidazol-2-yl-methylene) nicotinohydrazide [Ru(L⁴)(PPh₃)₂(Cl)] (4) have been synthesized and characterized. The methoxy-derivative of L³H (abbreviated as L³H*) exists in E configuration with torsional angle of 179.4° around C₇-N₈-N₉-C₁₀ linkage. Single crystal structures of acetonitrile coordinated ruthenium complexes of 1 and 3 having compositins as [Ru(L¹)(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)]Cl (1a) and [Ru(L³)(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)]Cl (3a) revealed coordination of tridentate ligands with significantly distorted octahedral geometry constructed by imine nitrogen, heterocyclic nitrogen, and enolate amide oxygen, forming a cis-planar ring with trans-placement of two PPh₃ groups and a coordinated acetonitrile. Ligands (L¹H-L⁴H) and their ruthenium complexes (1–4) are characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR, and IR spectral analysis. Ru(II) complexes have reversible to quasi-reversible redox behavior having Ru(II)/Ru(III) oxidation potentials in the range of 0.40–0.71 V. The DNA binding constants determined by absorption spectral titrations with Herring Sperm DNA (HS-DNA) reveal that L⁴H and 1 interact more strongly than other ligands and Ru(II) complexes. Complexes 1–3 exhibit DNA cleaving activity possibly due to strong electrostatic interactions while 4 displays intercalation.     

Ruthenium(II), copper(I) and silver(I) complexes of large bite bisphosphinite, bis(2-diphenylphosphinoxynaphthalen-1-yl)methane: Application of Ru(II) complexes towards the hydrogenation of styrene and phenylacetylene

Ruthenium(II), copper(I) and silver(I) complexes of large bite bisphosphinite Ph₂P{(-OC₁₀H₆)(μ-CH₂)(C₁₀H₆O-)}PPh₂ (1) are described. Reactions of bisphosphinite 1 with [Ru(η⁶-p-cymene)(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ and RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ afford mono- and bis-chelate complexes [RuCl(η⁶-p-cymene){η²-Ph₂P{(-OC₁₀H₆)(μ-CH₂)(C₁₀H₆O-)}PPh₂-κP,κP}]Cl (2) and trans-[RuCl₂{η²-Ph₂P{(-OC₁₀H₆)(μ-CH₂)(C₁₀H₆O-)}PPh₂-κP,κP}₂] (3), respectively. Treatment of 1 with CuX (X = Cl, Br and I) furnish 10-membered chelate complexes of the type [Cu(X){η²-Ph₂P(-OC₁₀H₆)(μ-CH₂)(C₁₀H₆O-)PPh₂-κP,κP}] (4, X = Cl; 5, X = Br; 6, X = I), whereas [Cu(MeCN)₄]PF₆ affords a bis-chelated cationic complex [Cu{η²-Ph₂P(-OC₁₀H₆)(μ-CH₂)(C₁₀H₆O-)PPh₂-κP,κP}₂][PF₆] (7). Reaction between 1 and AgOTf produce both mono- and bis-chelated complexes [Ag{η²-Ph₂P(-OC₁₀H₆)(μ-CH₂)(C₁₀H₆O-)PPh₂-κP,κP}(SO₃CF₃)] (8) and [Ag{η²-Ph₂P(-OC₁₀H₆)(μ-CH₂)(C₁₀H₆O-)PPh₂-κP,κP}₂][SO₃CF₃] (9), respectively; whereas the similar reaction of 1 with[Ag(OTf)PPh₃] affords chelate complex of the type [Ag{η²-Ph₂P(-OC₁₀H₆)(μ-CH₂)(C₁₀H₆O-)PPh₂-κP,κP}(PPh₃)(SO₃CF₃)] (10). All the complexes were characterized by ¹H NMR, ³¹P NMR, elemental analysis and mass spectrometry, including low-temperature NMR studies in the case of silver complexes. The molecular structures of 4 and 6 are determined by X-ray diffraction studies. Ruthenium complexes 2 and 3 promote catalytic hydrogenation of styrene and phenylacetylene with good turnover numbers.     

Acetylene Dithiolate Linking up the [Tp′W(CO)(CN)] Moiety with RuII or PdII

A series of heterodinuclear complexes with acetylene dithiolate (acdt^2?) as the bridging moiety were synthesised by a facile one‐pot procedure that avoided use of the highly elusive acetylene dithiol. Generation of the W–Ru complex [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] (Tp’=hydrotris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)borate) and the W–Pd complexes [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)] and [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)][PF₆] (dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphoshino)ethane), which exhibit a [W(η²‐κ²‐C₂S₂)M] core (M=Ru, Pd), was accomplished by using a transition‐metal‐assisted solvolytical removal of the Me₃Si‐ethyl thiol protecting groups. All intermediate species of the reaction have been fully characterised. The highly coloured W–Ru complex [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] shows reversible redox chemistry, as does the prototype complex [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)][PF₆]. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction and IR, EPR and UV/Vis spectroscopic studies in conjunction with DFT calculations prove the high electronic delocalisation of states over the acdt^2? linker. Comparative studies revealed a higher donor strength and more pronounced dithiolate character of acdt^2? in [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] relative to [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)]⁺. In addition, the influence of the overall complex charge on the metric parameters was investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies with the W–Pd complexes [Tp′WL₂(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)] (L=(CN^?)(CO) or (CO)₂). The central [W(C₂S₂)Pd] units exhibit high structural similarity, which indicates the extensive delocalisation of charge over both metals.     

钌配合物催化氢化CO2生成甲酸反应中的醇促进效应

在水合钌配合物[TpRu(PPh₃)₂(H₂O)]BF₄ [Tp＝hydrotris(pyrazolyl) borate]催化氢化二氧化碳生成甲酸的反应中观察到醇对反应的促进作用. 利用原位高压核磁共振跟踪催化反应过程的结果表明, 在甲醇溶液中, [TpRu(PPh₃)₂(H₂O)]BF₄在三乙胺和H₂作用下转化为TpRu(PPh₃)₂H. 二氧化碳插入Ru—H生成甲酸根配合物TpRu(PPh₃)₂(η¹-OCHO)•HOCH₃, 其中的甲酸根配体与醇分子间形成分子间氢键. 该甲酸根配合物随即转化为另一个甲酸根配合物TpRu(PPh₃)(CH₃OH)(η¹-OCHO)并与之达成平衡, 后者由于存在分子内氢键而稳定. 考虑到这两个甲酸根配合物在催化反应中的稳定性, 它们应该不在主要的催化循环内. 提出了配合物[TpRu(PPh₃)₂(H₂O)]BF₄在几种醇溶液中催化氢化二氧化碳生成甲酸的催化循环机理, 催化循环的关键中间体可能是TpRu(PPh₃)(ROH)H. 该中间体能同时转移负氢及醇配体中的氢质子到接近的二氧化碳分子上生成甲酸, 并吸收H₂生成过渡态TpRu(PPh₃)(OR)(H₂). 该过渡态经过σ-复分解反应重新生成TpRu(PPh₃)(ROH)H完成催化循环.     

A novel cis-push–pull effect in cycloruthenated azobenzene thiocarbonyl-containing complexes: crystal and molecular structures of [RuX(CS)(η-C,N-C6H4N=NPh)(PPh3)2](X=Cl, I)

Treatment of [RuHCl(CS)(PPh₃)₃] with Hg(o-C₆H₄N=NC₆H₅)₂ affords [RuCl(CS)(η²C,N-o-C₆H₄N=NC₆H₅)(PPh₃)₂] (1) in good yield, where the cyclometallated azobenzene ligand coordinates through an ortho-C and one azo-N to give a five-membered chelate ring. Reaction of 1 with AgNO₃ followed by NaBr or NaI affords the chloride-exchanged products [RuX(CO)(η²C,N-o-C₆H₄N=NC₆H₅)(PPh₃)₂] (2, 3), whereas reaction of 1 with AgOC(O)Me or NaS₂CNEt₂·2H₂O gives the halide mono-phosphine-substituted complexes [Ru(CS)(LL)(η²C,N-o-C₆H₄NNC₆H₅)(PPh₃)] (4, 5). In the solid-state structures of 1 and 3 there are significant changes in the bond lengths for the cyclometallated azobenzene ligand are observed relative to free azobenzene. These are discussed, with the aid of spectroscopic and crystallographic data, in terms of a cis-push–pull effect.     

Binding H2, N2, H-, and BH3 to transition-metal sulfur sites: synthesis and properties of [RuL(PR3)(N2Me2S2)] Complexes (L=eta2-H2, H-, BH3; R=Cy, iPr)

The reactions of [Ru(N₂)(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] [‘N₂Me₂S₂’=1,2‐ethanediamine‐N,N′‐dimethyl‐N,N′‐bis(2‐benzenethiolate)(2?)] [ 1 a (R=iPr), 1 b (R=Cy)] and [μ‐N₂{Ru(N₂)(PiPr₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)}₂] ( 1 c ) with H₂, NaBH₄, and NBu₄BH₄, intended to reduce the N₂ ligands, led to substitution of N₂ and formation of the new complexes [Ru(H₂)(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] [ 2 a (R=iPr), 2 b (R=Cy)], [Ru(BH₃)(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] [ 3 a (R=iPr), 3 b (R=Cy)], and [Ru(H)(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)]^? [ 4 a (R=iPr), 4 b (R=Cy)]. The BH₃ and hydride complexes 3 a , 3 b , 4 a , and 4 b were obtained subsequently by rational synthesis from 1 a or 1 b and BH₃?THF or LiBEt₃H. The primary step in all reactions probably is the dissociation of N₂ from the N₂ complexes to give coordinatively unsaturated [Ru(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] fragments that add H₂, BH₄^?, BH₃, or H^?. All complexes were completely characterized by elemental analysis and common spectroscopic methods. The molecular structures of [Ru(H₂)(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] [ 2 a (R=iPr), 2 b (R=Cy)], [Ru(BH₃)(PiPr₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] ( 3 a ), [Li(THF)₂][Ru(H)(PiPr₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] ([Li(THF)₂]‐ 4 a ), and NBu₄[Ru(H)(PCy₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] (NBu₄‐ 4 b ) were determined by X‐ray crystal structure analysis. Measurements of the NMR relaxation time T₁ corroborated the η² bonding mode of the H₂ ligands in 2 a (T₁=35 ms) and 2 b (T₁=21 ms). The H,D coupling constants of the analogous HD complexes HD‐ 2 a (¹J(H,D)=26.0 Hz) and HD‐ 2 b (¹J(H,D)=25.9 Hz) enabled calculation of the H? D distances, which agreed with the values found by X‐ray crystal structure analysis ( 2 a : 92 pm (X‐ray) versus 98 pm (calculated), 2 b : 99 versus 98 pm). The BH₃ entities in 3 a and 3 b bind to one thiolate donor of the [Ru(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] fragment and through a B‐H‐Ru bond to the Ru center. The hydride complex anions 4 a and 4 b are extremely Brønsted basic and are instantanously protonated to give the η²‐H₂ complexes 2 a and 2 b .     

Synthesis, isomerism, and catalytic properties of chelate ruthenium copper bimetallacarborane cluster exo-closo-(Ph3P)Cu(μ-H)Ru[Ph2P(CH2)4PPh2](η5-C2B9H11), in radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate

Chelate exo-nido-ruthenacarboranes exo-5,6,10-[RuCl(Ph₂P(CH₂)₄PPh₂)]-5,6,10-(μ-H)₃-10-H-7,8-R,R′-nido-7,8-C₂B₉H₆ (R, R′ = H, PhCH₂) were synthesized by the direct method using the reaction of Cl₂Ru(PPh₃)(Ph₂P(CH₂)₄PPh₂) with [7,8-R,R′-nido-7,8-C₂B₉H₁₀][K] in benzene. Unsubstituted exo-nido-ruthenacarborane (R, R′ = H) was used in situ for the synthesis of the dinuclear Ru-Cu exo-closo cluster of the formula exo-closo-(Ph₃P)Cu(μ-H)Ru(Ph₂P(CH₂)₄PPh₂)(η⁵-C₂B₉H₁₁). The isomerism of the complex and the crystal structure were studied by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. The catalytic activity of the cluster in the atom transfer radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate was investigated.     

Bio-catalysts and catalysts based on ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes imparting diphenyl-(2-pyridyl)-phosphine as a co-ligand

Reactions of the ruthenium complexes [Ru(κ³-tpy)(PPh₃)Cl₂], [Ru(κ³-tptz)(PPh₃)Cl₂] and [Ru(κ³-tpy)Cl₃] [tpy = 2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine; tptz = 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine] with diphenyl-(2-pyridyl)-phosphine (PPh₂Py) have been investigated. The complexes [Ru(κ³-tpy)(PPh₃)Cl₂] and [Ru(κ³-tptz)(PPh₃)Cl₂] reacted with PPh₂Py to afford [Ru(κ³-tpy)(κ¹-P-PPh₂Py)₂Cl]⁺ (1) and [Ru(κ³-tptz)(κ¹-P-PPh₂Py)₂Cl]⁺ (2), which were isolated as their tetrafluoroborate salts. Under analogous conditions, [Ru(κ³-tpy)Cl₃] gave a neutral complex [Ru(κ³-tpy)(κ¹-PPh₂Py)Cl₂] (3). Upon treatment with an excess of NH₄PF₆ in methanol, 1 and 2 gave [Ru(κ³-tpy)(κ¹-P-PPh₂Py)(κ²-P,N-PPh₂Py)](PF₆)₂ (4) and [Ru(κ³-tptz)(κ¹-P-PPh₂Py)(κ²-P,N-PPh₂Py)](PF₆)₂ (5) containing both monodentate and chelated PPh₂Py. Further, 4 and 5 reacted with an excess of NaCN and CH₃CN to afford [Ru(κ³-tpy)(κ¹-P-PPh₂Py)₂(CN)](PF₆) (6), [Ru(κ³-tpy)(κ¹-P-PPh₂Py)₂(NCCH₃)](PF₆)₂ (7), [Ru(κ³-tptz)(κ¹-P-PPh₂Py)₂(CN)]PF₆ (8) and [Ru(κ³-tptz)(κ¹-P-PPh₂Py)₂(NCCH₃)](PF₆)₂ (9) supporting hemi labile nature of the coordinated PPh₂Py. The complexes have been characterized by elemental analyses, spectral (IR, NMR, electronic absorption, FAB-MS), electrochemical studies and structures of 1, 2 and 3 determined by X-ray single crystal analyses. At higher concentration level (40 μM) the complexes under investigation exhibit inhibitory activity against DNA-Topo II of the filarial parasite S. cervi and 3 catalyses rearrangement of aldoximes to amide under aerobic conditions.     

Ruthenium bidentate phosphine complexes for the coordination and catalytic dehydrogenation of amine- and phosphine-boranes

Addition of the amine–boranes H₃B ? NH₂tBu, H₃B ? NHMe₂ and H₃B ? NH₃ to the cationic ruthenium fragment [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(OH₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 2 ; xantphos=4,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐9,9‐dimethylxanthene; BAr^F₄=[B{3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₄]^?) affords the η¹‐B? H bound amine–borane complexes [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₂tBu)H][BAr^F₄] ( 5 ), [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NHMe₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 6 ) and [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₃)H][BAr^F₄] ( 7 ). The X‐ray crystal structures of 5 and 7 have been determined with [BAr^F₄] and [BPh₄] anions, respectively. Treatment of 2 with H₃B ? PHPh₂ resulted in quite different behaviour, with cleavage of the B? P interaction taking place to generate the structurally characterised bis‐secondary phosphine complex [Ru(xantphos)(PHPh₂)₂H][BPh₄] ( 9 ). The xantphos complexes 2 , 5 and 9 proved to be poor precursors for the catalytic dehydrogenation of H₃B ? NHMe₂. While the dppf species (dppf=1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) [Ru(dppf)(PPh₃)HCl] ( 3 ) and [Ru(dppf)(η⁶‐C₆H₅PPh₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 4 ) showed better, but still moderate activity, the agostic‐stabilised N‐heterocyclic carbene derivative [Ru(dppf)(ICy)HCl] ( 12 ; ICy=1,3‐dicyclohexylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) proved to be the most efficient catalyst with a turnover number of 76 h^?1 at room temperature.     

Cooperative B–H bond activation: dual site borane activation by redox active κ2-N,S-chelated complexes

Cooperative dual site activation of boranes by redox-active 1,3-N,S-chelated ruthenium species, mer-[PR₃{κ²-N,S-(L)}₂Ru{κ¹-S-(L)}], (mer-2a: R = Cy, mer-2b: R = Ph; L = NC₇H₄S₂), generated from the aerial oxidation of borate complexes, [PR₃{κ²-N,S-(L)}Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-BH₂(L)₂}] (trans–mer-1a: R = Cy, trans–mer-1b: R = Ph; L = NC₇H₄S₂), has been investigated. Utilizing the rich electronic behaviour of these 1,3-N,S-chelated ruthenium species, we have established that a combination of redox-active ligands and metal–ligand cooperativity has a big influence on the multisite borane activation. For example, treatment of mer-2a–b with BH₃·THF led to the isolation of fac-[PR₃Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-(NH₂BSBH₂N)(S₂C₇H₄)₂}] (fac-3a: R = Cy and fac-3b: R = Ph) that captured boranes at both sites of the κ²-N,S-chelated ruthenacycles. The core structure of fac-3a and fac-3b consists of two five-membered ruthenacycles [RuBNCS] which are fused by one butterfly moiety [RuB₂S]. Analogous fac-3c, [PPh₃Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-(NH₂BSBH₂N)(SC₅H₄)₂}], can also be synthesized from the reaction of BH₃·THF with [PPh₃{κ²-N,S-(SNC₅H₄)}{κ³-H,S,S′-BH₂(SNH₄C₅)₂}Ru], cis–fac-1c. In stark contrast, when mer-2b was treated with BH₂Mes (Mes = 2,4,6-trimethyl phenyl) it led to the formation of trans- and cis-bis(dihydroborate) complexes [{κ³-S,H,H-(NH₂BMes)Ru(S₂C₇H₄)}₂], (trans-4 and cis-4). Both the complexes have two five-membered [Ru–(H)₂–B–NCS] ruthenacycles with κ²-H–H coordination modes. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggest that the activation of boranes across the dual Ru–N site is more facile than the Ru–S one.

Redox-active ruthenium complexes supported by hemilabile κ²-N,S-chelated ruthenacycles undergo unusual dual site B–H bond activation through metal–ligand cooperation with free and bulky boranes.     

Pyrrole‐2‐carbaldehyde Thiosemicarbazonates of Nickel(II) and Palladium(II): Synthesis,Structure, and Spectroscopy

Complexes of pyrrole‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazones, [(C₄H₄N⁴)(H)C²=N³–N²(H)–C¹(=S)–N¹HR; R = Ph, H₂L¹; Me, H₂L²; H, H₂L³] with nickel(II) and palladium(II) are described. The reaction of nickel(II) acetate with H₂L¹ in methanol in 1:1 molar ratio yielded a complex of composition, [Ni(κ²‐N³,S‐HL¹)₂] ( 1 ). Likewise reaction of NiCl₂ with H₂L² in 1:1 molar ratio in acetonitrile in the presence of triethylamine base followed by the addition of pyridine did not yield the anticipated [Ni(κ³‐N⁴,N³,S‐L²)(py)] complex, moreover a bis‐square‐planar complex, [Ni(κ²‐N³,S‐HL²)₂] ( 2 ) was formed. However, in the presence of bipyridine (bipy), it yielded the addition product, [Ni(κ²‐N³,S‐HL²)₂(κ²‐N, N‐bipy)] ( 3 ). Reaction of PdCl₂(κ²‐P, P–PPh₂–CH₂–PPh₂) with H₂L³ in toluene in the presence of triethylamine has yielded a complex of stoichiometry, [Pd(κ³‐N⁴,N³,S–L³)(κ¹‐P–PPh₂–CH₂–P(O)Ph₂] ( 4 ). The ligands (HL¹)^– and (HL²)^– are chelating to Ni^II metal atom as anions binding through N³,S‐donor atoms with pendant pyrrole groups, and (L³)^2– is chelating to the Pd^II metal atom as dianion through N⁴,N³,S‐donor atoms (pyrrole is N⁴‐bonded). Fourth site in 4 is bonded to one P‐donor atom of PPh₂–CH₂–P(O)Ph₂, whose pendant –PPh₂ group involves auto oxidation to –P(O)PPh₂ during reaction. These complexes were characterized using analytical data, IR, NMR (¹H, ³¹P) spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography. Complexes 1 , 2 , and 4 have square‐planar arrangement, whereas complex 3 is octahedral.     

Nickelphosphankomplexe der Mercaptoessigsäure

Nickel Complexes of Mercaptoacetic Acid The reaction of [Cp°₂Zr(OOCCH₂SH‐κ¹O)(OOCCH₂SH‐κ²O, O′)] (Cp° = C₅EtMe₄) with [NiCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₂] or [NiCl₂(dppe)] (dppe = PPh₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂) in the presence of NEt₃ yields the tetranuclear Zr^IV/Ni^II complex [{Cp°₂Zr(κ¹O‐OOCCH₂S‐κ²O′, S)(κ²O, O′‐OOCCH₂S‐κ¹S)Ni(PMe₂Ph)}₂] ( 1 ) and the chelate complexes [Ni(OOCCH₂S‐κ²O, S)L₂] [L = PMe₂Ph ( 2 ), L₂ = dppe ( 3 )]. 2 and 3 are also accessible from [NiCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₂] or [NiCl₂(dppe)] and mercaptoacetic acid in the presence of NEt₃ in quantitative yield. The structure of 2 is dynamic in solution, whereby a complex with three‐coordinate nickel atom is formed. 2 and 3 were characterized spectroscopically (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR and IR) and by crystal structure determination.