Substantial improvements in large-scale redocking and screening using the novel HYDE scoring function

The HYDE scoring function consistently describes hydrogen bonding, the hydrophobic effect and desolvation. It relies on HYdration and DEsolvation terms which are calibrated using octanol/water partition coefficients of small molecules. We do not use affinity data for calibration, therefore HYDE is generally applicable to all protein targets. HYDE reflects the Gibbs free energy of binding while only considering the essential interactions of protein-ligand complexes. The greatest benefit of HYDE is that it yields a very intuitive atom-based score, which can be mapped onto the ligand and protein atoms. This allows the direct visualization of the score and consequently facilitates analysis of protein-ligand complexes during the lead optimization process. In this study, we validated our new scoring function by applying it in large-scale docking experiments. We could successfully predict the correct binding mode in 93% of complexes in redocking calculations on the Astex diverse set, while our performance in virtual screening experiments using the DUD dataset showed significant enrichment values with a mean AUC of 0.77 across all protein targets with little or no structural defects. As part of these studies, we also carried out a very detailed analysis of the data that revealed interesting pitfalls, which we highlight here and which should be addressed in future benchmark datasets.     

Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening

Docking programs are widely used to discover novel ligands efficiently and can predict protein-ligand complex structures with reasonable accuracy and speed. However, there is an emerging demand for better performance from the scoring methods. Consensus scoring (CS) methods improve the performance by compensating for the deficiencies of each scoring function. However, conventional CS and existing scoring functions have the same problems, such as a lack of protein flexibility, inadequate treatment of salvation, and the simplistic nature of the energy function used. Although there are many problems in current scoring functions, we focus our attention on the incorporation of unbound ligand conformations. To address this problem, we propose supervised consensus scoring (SCS), which takes into account protein-ligand binding process using unbound ligand conformations with supervised learning. An evaluation of docking accuracy for 100 diverse protein-ligand complexes shows that SCS outperforms both CS and 11 scoring functions (PLP, F-Score, LigScore, DrugScore, LUDI, X-Score, AutoDock, PMF, G-Score, ChemScore, and D-score). The success rates of SCS range from 89% to 91% in the range of rmsd < 2 A, while those of CS range from 80% to 85%, and those of the scoring functions range from 26% to 76%. Moreover, we also introduce a method for judging whether a compound is active or inactive with the appropriate criterion for virtual screening. SCS performs quite well in docking accuracy and is presumably useful for screening large-scale compound databases before predicting binding affinity.     

Evaluation of several two-step scoring functions based on linear interaction energy, effective ligand size, and empirical pair potentials for prediction of protein-ligand binding geometry and free energy

The performances of several two-step scoring approaches for molecular docking were assessed for their ability to predict binding geometries and free energies. Two new scoring functions designed for "step 2 discrimination" were proposed and compared to our CHARMM implementation of the linear interaction energy (LIE) approach using the Generalized-Born with Molecular Volume (GBMV) implicit solvation model. A scoring function S1 was proposed by considering only "interacting" ligand atoms as the "effective size" of the ligand and extended to an empirical regression-based pair potential S2. The S1 and S2 scoring schemes were trained and 5-fold cross-validated on a diverse set of 259 protein-ligand complexes from the Ligand Protein Database (LPDB). The regression-based parameters for S1 and S2 also demonstrated reasonable transferability in the CSARdock 2010 benchmark using a new data set (NRC HiQ) of diverse protein-ligand complexes. The ability of the scoring functions to accurately predict ligand geometry was evaluated by calculating the discriminative power (DP) of the scoring functions to identify native poses. The parameters for the LIE scoring function with the optimal discriminative power (DP) for geometry (step 1 discrimination) were found to be very similar to the best-fit parameters for binding free energy over a large number of protein-ligand complexes (step 2 discrimination). Reasonable performance of the scoring functions in enrichment of active compounds in four different protein target classes established that the parameters for S1 and S2 provided reasonable accuracy and transferability. Additional analysis was performed to definitively separate scoring function performance from molecular weight effects. This analysis included the prediction of ligand binding efficiencies for a subset of the CSARdock NRC HiQ data set where the number of ligand heavy atoms ranged from 17 to 35. This range of ligand heavy atoms is where improved accuracy of predicted ligand efficiencies is most relevant to real-world drug design efforts.     

An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: II. Validation of the scoring function

We have developed an iterative knowledge-based scoring function (ITScore) to describe protein-ligand interactions. Here, we assess ITScore through extensive tests on native structure identification, binding affinity prediction, and virtual database screening. Specifically, ITScore was first applied to a test set of 100 protein-ligand complexes constructed by Wang et al. (J Med Chem 2003, 46, 2287), and compared with 14 other scoring functions. The results show that ITScore yielded a high success rate of 82% on identifying native-like binding modes under the criterion of rmsd < or = 2 A for each top-ranked ligand conformation. The success rate increased to 98% if the top five conformations were considered for each ligand. In the case of binding affinity prediction, ITScore also obtained a good correlation for this test set (R = 0.65). Next, ITScore was used to predict binding affinities of a second diverse test set of 77 protein-ligand complexes prepared by Muegge and Martin (J Med Chem 1999, 42, 791), and compared with four other widely used knowledge-based scoring functions. ITScore yielded a high correlation of R2 = 0.65 (or R = 0.81) in the affinity prediction. Finally, enrichment tests were performed with ITScore against four target proteins using the compound databases constructed by Jacobsson et al. (J Med Chem 2003, 46, 5781). The results were compared with those of eight other scoring functions. ITScore yielded high enrichments in all four database screening tests. ITScore can be easily combined with the existing docking programs for the use of structure-based drug design.     

Fully automated molecular mechanics based induced fit protein-ligand docking method

We describe a method for docking a ligand into a protein receptor while allowing flexibility of the protein binding site. The method employs a multistep procedure that begins with the generation of protein and ligand conformations. An initial placement of the ligand is then performed by computing binding site hotspots. This initial placement is followed by a protein side-chain refinement stage that models protein flexibility. The final step of the process is an energy minimization of the ligand pose in the presence of the rigid receptor. Thus the algorithm models flexibility of the protein at two stages, before and after ligand placement. We validated this method by performing docking and cross docking studies of eight protein systems for which crystal structures were available for at least two bound ligands. The resulting rmsd values of the 21 docked protein-ligand complexes showed values of 2 A or less for all but one of the systems examined. The method has two critical benefits for high throughput virtual screening studies. First, no user intervention is required in the docking once the initial binding site selection has been made in the protein. Second, the initial protein conformation generation needs to be performed only once for a given binding region. Also, the method may be customized in various ways depending on the particular scenario in which dockings are being performed. Each of the individual steps of the method is fully independent making it straightforward to explore different variants of the high level workflow to further improve accuracy and performance.     

Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5

We report on the development and validation of a new version of DOCK. The algorithm has been rewritten in a modular format, which allows for easy implementation of new scoring functions, sampling methods and analysis tools. We validated the sampling algorithm with a test set of 114 protein-ligand complexes. Using an optimized parameter set, we are able to reproduce the crystal ligand pose to within 2 A of the crystal structure for 79% of the test cases using our rigid ligand docking algorithm with an average run time of 1 min per complex and for 72% of the test cases using our flexible ligand docking algorithm with an average run time of 5 min per complex. Finally, we perform an analysis of the docking failures in the test set and determine that the sampling algorithm is generally sufficient for the binding pose prediction problem for up to 7 rotatable bonds; i.e. 99% of the rigid ligand docking cases and 95% of the flexible ligand docking cases are sampled successfully. We point out that success rates could be improved through more advanced modeling of the receptor prior to docking and through improvement of the force field parameters, particularly for structures containing metal-based cofactors.     

Alternative to consensus scoring--a new approach toward the qualitative combination of docking algorithms

Since the development of the first docking algorithm in the early 1980s a variety of different docking approaches and tools has been created in order to solve the docking problem. Subsequent studies have shown that the docking performance of most tools strongly depends on the considered target. Thus it is hard to choose the best algorithm in the situation at hand. The docking tools FlexX and AutoDock are among the most popular programs for docking flexible ligands into target proteins. Their analysis, comparison, and combination are the topics of this study. In contrast to standard consensus scoring techniques which integrate different scoring algorithms usually only by their rank, we focus on a more general approach. Our new combined docking workflow-AutoxX-unifies the interaction models of AutoDock and FlexX rather than combining the scores afterward which allows interpretability of the results. The performance of FlexX, AutoDock, and the combined algorithm AutoxX was evaluated on the basis of a test set of 204 structures from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). AutoDock and FlexX show a highly diverse redocking accuracy at the different complexes which assures again the usefulness of taking several docking algorithms into account. With the combined docking the number of complexes reproduced below an rmsd of 2.5 A could be raised by 10. AutoxX had a strong positive effect on several targets. The highest performance increase could be found when redocking 20 protein-ligand complexes of alpha-thrombin, plasmepsin, neuraminidase, and d-xylose isomerase. A decrease was found for gamma-chymotrypsin. The results show that--applied to the right target-AutoxX can improve the docking performance compared to AutoDock and FlexX alone.     

Protein-ligand docking against non-native protein conformers

In the validation of protein-ligand docking protocols, performance is mostly measured against native protein conformers, i.e. each ligand is docked into the protein conformation from the structure that contained that ligand. In real-life applications, however, ligands are docked against non-native conformations of the protein, i.e. the apo structure or a structure of a different protein-ligand complex. Here, we have constructed an extensive test set for assessing docking performance against non-native protein conformations. This new test set is built on the Astex Diverse Set (which we recently constructed for assessing native docking performance) and contains 1112 non-native structures for 65 drug targets. Using the protein-ligand docking program GOLD, the Astex Diverse Set and the new Astex Non-native Set, we established that, whereas docking performance (top-ranked solution within 2 A rmsd of the experimental binding mode) is approximately 80% for native docking, this drops to 61% for non-native docking. A similar drop-off is observed for sampling performance (any solution within 2 A): 91% for native docking vs 72% for non-native docking. No significant differences were observed between docking performance against apo and nonapo structures. We found that, whereas small variations in protein conformation are generally tolerated by our rigid docking protocol, larger protein movements result in a catastrophic drop-off in performance. Some docking performance and nearly all sampling performance can be recovered by considering dockings produced against a small number of non-native structures simultaneously. Docking against non-native structures of complexes containing ligands that are similar to the docked ligand also significantly improves both docking performance and sampling performance.     

Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application

Benchmarks for molecular docking have historically focused on re-docking the cognate ligand of a well-determined protein-ligand complex to measure geometric pose prediction accuracy, and measurement of virtual screening performance has been focused on increasingly large and diverse sets of target protein structures, cognate ligands, and various types of decoy sets. Here, pose prediction is reported on the Astex Diverse set of 85 protein ligand complexes, and virtual screening performance is reported on the DUD set of 40 protein targets. In both cases, prepared structures of targets and ligands were provided by symposium organizers. The re-prepared data sets yielded results not significantly different than previous reports of Surflex-Dock on the two benchmarks. Minor changes to protein coordinates resulting from complex pre-optimization had large effects on observed performance, highlighting the limitations of cognate ligand re-docking for pose prediction assessment. Docking protocols developed for cross-docking, which address protein flexibility and produce discrete families of predicted poses, produced substantially better performance for pose prediction. Performance on virtual screening performance was shown to benefit by employing and combining multiple screening methods: docking, 2D molecular similarity, and 3D molecular similarity. In addition, use of multiple protein conformations significantly improved screening enrichment.     

Development of biologically active compounds by combining 3D QSAR and structure-based design methods

One of the major challenges in computational approaches to drug design is the accurate prediction of the binding affinity of novel biomolecules. In the present study an automated procedure which combines docking and 3D-QSAR methods was applied to several drug targets. The developed receptor-based 3D-QSAR methodology was tested on several sets of ligands for which the three-dimensional structure of the target protein has been solved – namely estrogen receptor, acetylcholine esterase and protein-tyrosine-phosphatase 1B. The molecular alignments of the studied ligands were determined using the docking program AutoDock and were compared with the X-ray structures of the corresponding protein-ligand complexes. The automatically generated protein-based ligand alignment obtained was subsequently taken as basis for a comparative field analysis applying the GRID/GOLPE approach. Using GRID interaction fields and applying variable selection procedures, highly predictive models were obtained. It is expected that concepts from receptor-based 3D QSAR will be valuable tools for the analysis of high-throughput screening as well as virtual screening data     

New approach to molecular docking and its application to virtual screening of chemical databases

This paper describes the validation of a molecular docking method and its application to virtual database screening. The code flexibly docks ligand molecules into rigid receptor structures using a tabu search methodology driven by an empirically derived function for estimating the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex. The docking method has been tested on 70 ligand-receptor complexes for which the experimental binding affinity and binding geometry are known. The lowest energy geometry produced by the docking protocol is within 2.0 A root mean square of the experimental binding mode for 79% of the complexes. The method has been applied to the problem of virtual database screening to identify known ligands for thrombin, factor Xa, and the estrogen receptor. A database of 10,000 randomly chosen "druglike" molecules has been docked into the three receptor structures. In each case known receptor ligands were included in the study. The results showed good separation between the predicted binding affinities of the known ligand set and the database subset.     

Surflex-Dock 2.1: Robust performance from ligand energetic modeling,ring flexibility,and knowledge-based search

The Surflex flexible molecular docking method has been generalized and extended in two primary areas related to the search component of docking. First, incorporation of a small-molecule force-field extends the search into Cartesian coordinates constrained by internal ligand energetics. Whereas previous versions searched only the alignment and acyclic torsional space of the ligand, the new approach supports dynamic ring flexibility and all-atom optimization of docked ligand poses. Second, knowledge of well established molecular interactions between ligand fragments and a target protein can be directly exploited to guide the search process. This offers advantages in some cases over the search strategy where ligand alignment is guided solely by a “protomol” (a pre-computed molecular representation of an idealized ligand). Results are presented on both docking accuracy and screening utility using multiple publicly available benchmark data sets that place Surflex’s performance in the context of other molecular docking methods. In terms of docking accuracy, Surflex-Dock 2.1 performs as well as the best available methods. In the area of screening utility, Surflex’s performance is extremely robust, and it is clearly superior to other methods within the set of cases for which comparative data are available, with roughly double the screening enrichment performance.     

Flexible docking under pharmacophore type constraints

FlexX-Pharm, an extended version of the flexible docking tool FlexX, allows the incorporation of information about important characteristics of protein-ligand binding modes into a docking calculation. This information is introduced as a simple set of constraints derived from receptor-based type pharmacophore features.The constraints are determined by selected FlexX interactions and inclusion volumes in the receptor active site. They guide the docking process to produce a set of docking solutions with particular properties. By applying a series of look-ahead checks during the flexible construction of ligand fragments within the active site, FlexX-Pharm determines which partially built docking solutions can potentially obey the constraints. Solutions that will not obey the constraints are deleted as early as possible, often decreasing the calculation time and enabling new docking solutions to emerge. FlexX-Pharm was evaluated on various individual protein-ligand complexes where the top docking solutions generated by FlexX had high root mean square deviations (RMSD) from the experimentally observed binding modes. FlexX-Pharm showed an improvement in the RMSD of the top solutions in most cases, along with a reduction in run time. We also tested FlexX-Pharm as a database screening tool on a small dataset of molecules for three target proteins. In two cases, FlexX-Pharm missed one or two of the active molecules due to the constraints selected. However, in general FlexX-Pharm maintained or improved the enrichment shown with FlexX, while completing the screen in considerably less run time.     

Importance of accurate charges in molecular docking: quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) approach

The extent to which accuracy of electric charges plays a role in protein-ligand docking is investigated through development of a docking algorithm, which incorporates quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) calculations. In this algorithm, fixed charges of ligands obtained from force field parameterization are replaced by QM/MM calculations in the protein environment, treating only the ligands as the quantum region. The algorithm is tested on a set of 40 cocrystallized structures taken from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and provides strong evidence that use of nonfixed charges is important. An algorithm, dubbed "Survival of the Fittest" (SOF) algorithm, is implemented to incorporate QM/MM charge calculations without any prior knowledge of native structures of the complexes. Using an iterative protocol, this algorithm is able in many cases to converge to a nativelike structure in systems where redocking of the ligand using a standard fixed charge force field exhibits nontrivial errors. The results demonstrate that polarization effects can play a significant role in determining the structures of protein-ligand complexes, and provide a promising start towards the development of more accurate docking methods for lead optimization applications.     

Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors

Since the evaluation of ligand conformations is a crucial aspect of structure-based virtual screening, scoring functions play significant roles in it. However, it is known that a scoring function does not always work well for all target proteins. When one cannot know which scoring function works best against a target protein a priori, there is no standard scoring method to know it even if 3D structure of a target protein-ligand complex is available. Therefore, development of the method to achieve high enrichments from given scoring functions and 3D structure of protein-ligand complex is a crucial and challenging task. To address this problem, we applied SCS (supervised consensus scoring), which employs a rough linear correlation between the binding free energy and the root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) of a native ligand conformations and incorporates protein-ligand binding process with docked ligand conformations using supervised learning, to virtual screening. We evaluated both the docking poses and enrichments of SCS and five scoring functions (F-Score, G-Score, D-Score, ChemScore, and PMF) for three different target proteins: thymidine kinase (TK), thrombin (thrombin), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). Our enrichment studies show that SCS is competitive or superior to a best single scoring function at the top ranks of screened database. We found that the enrichments of SCS could be limited by a best scoring function, because SCS is obtained on the basis of the five individual scoring functions. Therefore, it is concluded that SCS works very successfully from our results. Moreover, from docking pose analysis, we revealed the connection between enrichment and average centroid distance of top-scored docking poses. Since SCS requires only one 3D structure of protein-ligand complex, SCS will be useful for identifying new ligands.     

Molecular docking with ligand attached water molecules

A novel approach to incorporate water molecules in protein-ligand docking is proposed. In this method, the water molecules display the same flexibility during the docking simulation as the ligand. The method solvates the ligand with the maximum number of water molecules, and these are then retained or displaced depending on energy contributions during the docking simulation. Instead of being a static part of the receptor, each water molecule is a flexible on/off part of the ligand and is treated with the same flexibility as the ligand itself. To favor exclusion of the water molecules, a constant entropy penalty is added for each included water molecule. The method was evaluated using 12 structurally diverse protein-ligand complexes from the PDB, where several water molecules bridge the ligand and the protein. A considerable improvement in successful docking simulations was found when including flexible water molecules solvating hydrogen bonding groups of the ligand. The method has been implemented in the docking program Molegro Virtual Docker (MVD).     

Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking

We have performed a comparative assessment of several programs for flexible molecular docking: DOCK 4.0, FlexX 1.8, AutoDock 3.0, GOLD 1.2 and ICM 2.8. This was accomplished using two different studies: docking experiments on a data set of 37 protein-ligand complexes and screening a library containing 10,037 entries against 11 different proteins. The docking accuracy of the methods was judged based on the corresponding rank-one solutions. We have found that the fraction of molecules docked with acceptable accuracy is 0.47, 0.31, 0.35, 0.52 and 0.93 for, respectively, AutoDock, DOCK, FlexX, GOLD and ICM. Thus ICM provided the highest accuracy in ligand docking against these receptors. The results from the other programs are found to be less accurate and of approximately the same quality. A speed comparison demonstrated that FlexX was the fastest and AutoDock was the slowest among the tested docking programs. The database screening was performed using DOCK, FlexX and ICM. ICM was able to identify the original ligands within the top 1% of the total library in 17 cases. The corresponding number for DOCK and FlexX was 7 and 8, respectively. We have estimated that in virtual database screening, 50% of the potentially active compounds will be found among approximately 1.5% of the top scoring solutions found with ICM and among approximately 9% of the top scoring solutions produced by DOCK and FlexX.     

Novel ligands for a purine riboswitch discovered by RNA-ligand docking

The increasing number of RNA crystal structures enables a structure-based approach to the discovery of new RNA-binding ligands. To develop the poorly explored area of RNA-ligand docking, we have conducted a virtual screening exercise for a purine riboswitch to probe the strengths and weaknesses of RNA-ligand docking. Using a standard protein-ligand docking program with only minor modifications, four new ligands with binding affinities in the micromolar range were identified, including two compounds based on molecular scaffolds not resembling known ligands. RNA-ligand docking performed comparably to protein-ligand docking indicating that this approach is a promising option to explore the wealth of RNA structures for structure-based ligand design.     

Protein ligand docking based on empirical method for binding affinity estimation

An empirical protein-ligand binding affinity estimation method, SCORE, was incorporated into a popular docking program, DOCK4. The combined program, ScoreDock, was used to reconstruct the 200 protein-ligand complex structures and found to give good results for the complexes with high binding affinities. A quality assessment method for docking results from ScoreDock was developed based on the whole test set and tested by additionally selected complexes. The method significantly improves the docking accuracy and was shown to be reliable in docking quality assessment. As a docking tool in structural based drug design, ScoreDock can screen out final hits directly based on the predicted negative logarithms of dissociation equilibrium constants of protein-ligand complexes, and can explicitly deal with structure water molecules, as well as metal atoms.