Numerical approximation of product integrals

A technique for the numerical approximation of matrix-valued Riemann product integrals is developed. For a ? x < y ? b, I_m(x, y) denotes

$\text{∫}\text{χ}\text{y}\text{∫}\text{χ}\text{v}{}_2\text{?}\text{∫}\text{χ}\text{v}{}_2\text{∏}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{F(ν}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)dν}{}_1\text{dν}{}_2\text{?dν}{}_{\mathrm{m}}$

, and A_m(x, y) denotes an approximation of I_m(x, y) of the form

$\text{(y?x)}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{∑}\text{k=1}\text{n}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{∏}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{F(χ}{}_{\mathrm{ik}}\text{)}$

, where a_k and y_ik are fixed numbers for i = 1, 2,…, m and k = 1, 2,…, N and x_ik = x + (y ? x)y_ik. The following result is established. If p is a positive integer, F is a function from the real numbers to the set of w × w matrices with real elements and F⁽¹⁾ exists and is continuous on [a, b], then there exists a bounded interval function H such that, if n, r, and s are positive integers, $\text{(b ? a)}\text{n}\text{= h < 1, x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= a + hi}\text{for}\text{i = 0, 1,…, n}\text{and}\text{0 < r ? s ? n}$, then

$\text{∏}\text{χ}{}_{\mathrm{r?}}\text{χ}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(I+F dχ)?}\text{∏}\text{i=r}\text{s}\text{I+}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{p}\text{I}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(χ}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{,χ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$

$\text{=h}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{H(χ}{}_{\mathrm{r?1}}\text{,χ}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{)+O(h}{}^{\mathrm{p+1}}\text{)}$

Further, if F^(j) exists and is continuous on [a, b] for j = 1, 2,…, p + 1 and A is exact for polynomials of degree less than p + 1 ? j for j = 1, 2,…, p, then the preceding result remains valid when A_j is substituted for I_j.     

A regularity result for singular nonlinear elliptic systems in inverse-power weighted Sobolev spaces

The compactness method to weighted spaces is extended to prove the following theorem:Let H_2,s¹(B₁) be the weighted Sobolev space on the unit ball in Rⁿ with norm

$\text{6ν6}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{2,s}}\text{=}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|ν|}{}^2\text{dx + ∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|Dν|}{}^2\text{dx.}$

Let n ? 2 ? s < n. Let u? [H_2,s¹(B₁) ∩ L^∞(B₁)]^N be a solution of the nonlinear elliptic system

$\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{(x,u) D}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{j\psi }}{}_{\mathrm{K}}\text{dx=0}$

, $\text{∨}\text{ψ}\text{?}\text{¦C}{}_0{}^1\text{(B}{}_1\text{)¦}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}\text{where}\text{¦A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}\text{¦ ? L, A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}$ are uniformly continuous functions of their arguments and satisfy:

$\text{|η|}{}^2\text{=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{N}\text{|η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{|}{}^2\text{?}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{,}\text{?η?R}{}^{\mathrm{Nn}}$

. Then there exists an R₁, 0 < R₁ < 1, and an α, 0 < α < 1, along with a set $\text{Ω ? B}{}_1$ such that (1) $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 2}}\text{(Ω) = 0}$, (2) Ω does not contain the origin; Ω does not contain B_R1, (3) $\text{B}{}_1\text{? Ω}$ is open, (4) u is $\text{Lip}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(B}{}_1\text{? Ω)}$; u is Lip_αB_R1.     

Construction of a recurrence relation for modified moments

In this paper we are constructing a recurrence relation of the form

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{r}\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(k)m}{}_{\mathrm{k+i}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f] = ω(k)}$

for integrals (called modified moments)

$\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f]df=}\text{∫}\text{?1}\text{1}\text{f(x)C}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(\lambda )}}\text{(x)dx (k = 0,1,…)}$

in which C_k^(λ) is the k-th Gegenbauer polynomial of order $\text{λ(λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}$, and f is a function satisfying the differential equation

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)f}{}^{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{(x) = p(x) (?1?x?1)}$

of order n, where p₀, p₁, …, p_n ? 0 are polynomials, and m_k^〈λ〉[p] is known for every k. We give three methods of construction of such a recurrence relation. The first of them (called Method I) is optimum in a certain sense.     

A divided difference inequality for n-convex functions

For a₍₁₎ ? a₍₂₎ ? ··· ? a_(n) ? 0, b₍₁₎ ? b₍₂₎ ? ··· ? b_(n) ? 0, the ordered values of a_i, b_i, i = 1, 2,…, n, m fixed, m ? n, and p ? 1 it is shown that

$\text{∑}\text{1}\text{n}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m}\text{a}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m?k?1}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{+}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{[m?k]}}\text{(k+1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>q</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>q</mtext>}}$

where $\text{1}\text{p}\text{+}\text{1}\text{q}\text{= 1, b}{}_{\mathrm{[j]}}\text{= b}{}_{\mathrm{(j)}}\text{+ b}{}_{\mathrm{(j\; +\; 1)}}\text{+ ··· + b}{}_{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{,}\text{and}\text{k}$ is the integer such that $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k\; ?\; 1)}}\text{?}\text{b[m ? k]}\text{(k + 1)}$ and $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k)}}\text{<}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{[m\; ?\; k\; +\; 1]}}\text{k}$. The inequality is shown to be sharp. When p < 1 and a_(i)'s are in increasing order then the inequality is reversed.     

Uniqueness of solutions of nonlinear Dirichlet problems

In this paper, we consider the uniqueness of radial solutions of the nonlinear Dirichlet problem $\text{Δu + ?(u) = 0}\text{in}\text{Ω}\text{with}\text{u = 0}\text{on}\text{?Ω,}\text{where}\text{Δ = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{?}{}^2\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2\text{,?}$ satisfies some appropriate conditions and Ω is a bounded smooth domain in $\text{R}$ⁿ which possesses radial symmetry. Our uniqueness results apply to, for instance, $\text{?(u) = u}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{, p > 1}$, or more generally λu + ∑_{i = 1}^ka_iu^pi, λ ? 0, a_i > 0 and p_i > 1 with appropriate upper bounds, and Ω a ball or an annulus.     

Orthogonal polynomials on the negative multinomial distribution

Orthogonal polynomials on the multivariate negative binomial distribution,

$\text{(1 + Θ)}{}^{\mathrm{?\alpha ?x}}\text{(}\text{π}\text{j=0}\text{p}\text{Θ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^{\mathrm{x}}\text{j}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{!}\text{)}\text{Γ(α + x)}\text{Γ(α)}$

where α > 0, Θ₁ > 0, x = ΣΘ_i, x₀, x₁, …, x_p = 0,1, … are constructed and their properties studied.     

Superexponential decay of solutions of a semilinear wave equation

Consider a smooth solution of $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{tt}}\text{? Δu + q(x) ¦ u ¦}{}^{\mathrm{p?1}}\text{u = 0 x ? R}{}^3\text{, q ? 0}$ and is C¹, and 1 < p < 5. Assume that the initial data decay sufficiently rapidly at infinity, $\text{q(x) ? a}\text{exp}\text{(?b ¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{c}}\text{), a, b > 0, c > 1}$, and for simplicity, q_r ? 0. Then the local energy decays faster than exponentially.     

Sur les équations de Lane–Emden avec opérateurs non linéaires

In this Note we consider nonnegative solutions for the nonlinear equation

$\text{M}{}^{\mathrm{+}}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda ,\Lambda }}\text{D}{}^2\text{u}\text{+|x|}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{u}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{=0}$

in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{N}}$, where $\text{M}{}^{\mathrm{+}}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda ,\Lambda }}\text{(D}{}^2\text{u)}$ is the so called Pucci operator

$\text{M}{}^{\mathrm{+}}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda ,\Lambda }}\text{(M)=λ}\text{∑}\text{e}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{<0}\text{e}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{+Λ}\text{∑}\text{e}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{>0}\text{e}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{,}$

and the e_i are the eigenvalues of M et Λ?λ>0. We prove that if u satisfies the decreasing estimate

$\text{lim}\text{|x|→+∞}\text{|x|}{}^{\mathrm{\beta ?1}}\text{u(x)=0}$

for some β satisfying (β?1)(p?1)>2+α then u is radial. In a second time we prove that if $\text{p<}\text{N+2α+2}\text{N?2}$ and u is a nonnegative radial solution of (1), u(x)=g(r), such that g″ changes sign at most once, then u is zero. To cite this article: I. Birindelli, F. Demengel, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 336 (2003).     

On the closability of some positive definite symmetric differential forms on c0∞(ω)

Let $\text{S}$ be a Dirichlet form in $\text{L}{}^2\text{(Ω; m)}$, where Ω is an open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ, n ? 2, and m a Radon measure on Ω; for each integer k with 1 ? k < n, let $\text{S}$_k be a Dirichlet form on some k-dimensional submanifold $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{k}}$ of Ω. The paper is devoted to the study of the closability of the forms E with domain $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ and defined by: $\text{(?,g)=}$$\text{E}$$\text{(?, g)+}\text{∑}\text{i}\text{p}\text{=1}$$\text{E}$k_i where 1 ? k_p < ? < n, and where , g^k_i denote restrictions of ?, g in $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ to . Conditions are given for E to be closable if, for each i = 1,…, p, one has k_i = n ? i. Other conditions are given for E to be nonclosable if, for some i, k_i < n ? i.     

Certain isometries of rectangular complex matrices

If s₁(A) ? ? ? s_m(A) are the singular values of A ? M_m,n(C), and if 1 ?k ?m ? and p ? 1, then

$\text{φ}{}_{\mathrm{p,k}}\text{(A) = (}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{k}\text{s}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{(A)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}$

is a unitarily invariant norm. In this paper a complete determination of the extreme points on the corresponding unit spheres is accomplished in all cases, enabling the isometries with respect to Φ_p,_k to be determined in the case p = 1. This removes the restriction m = n in an earlier paper of the author and Marcus.     

Sublinear perturbations of the differential equation y(n) = 0 and of the analogous difference equation

According to a result of A. Ghizzetti, for any solution y(t) of the differential equation where $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(t)+}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n?1}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t) y}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)=0}\text{(t ? 1)}$, $\text{∝}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)¦x}{}^{\mathrm{n?I?1}}\text{dx < ∞}$ (0 ?i ? n ?1, either y(t) = 0 for t ? 1 or there is an integer r with 0 ? r ? n ? 1 such that $\text{lim}\text{t → ∞}\text{y(t)}\text{t}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$ exists and ≠0. Related results are obtained for difference and differential inequalities. A special case of the former has interesting applications in the study of orthogonal polynomials.     

Strong law for the bootstrap

Let X₁, X₂, X₃, … be i.i.d. r.v. with E|X₁| < ∞, E X₁ = μ. Given a realization X = (X₁,X₂,…) and integers n and m, construct Y_n,i, i = 1, 2, …, m as i.i.d. r.v. with conditional distribution $\text{P}{}^1\text{(Y}{}_{\mathrm{n,i}}\text{= X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{) =}\text{1}\text{n}$ for 1 ? j ? n. ($\text{P}{}^1$ denotes conditional distribution given X). Conditions relating the growth rate of m with n and the moments of X₁ are given to ensure the almost sure convergence of $\text{(}\text{1}\text{m}\text{)Σ}{}^{\mathrm{m}}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{n,i}}$ toμ. This equation is of some relevance in the theory of Bootstrap as developed by Efron (1979) and Bickel and Freedman (1981).     

Uniqueness and continuous dependence results for solutions of singular differential equations

Solutions of Cauchy problems for the singular equations $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{tt}}\text{+ (}\text{Ψ(t)}\text{t}\text{) u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{= Mu}$ (in a Hilbert space setting) and $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{+ Δu +}\text{∑}\text{m}\text{i=1}\text{((}\text{k}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)(}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)) + g(t)u=0}\text{in}\text{ω × |0,T)}$, ω={(x₁,…,x_M)ε$\text{R}$^m: 0 < x_i < c_i for each i=1,…,m} are shown to be unique and to depend Hölder continuously on the initial data in suitably chosen measures for 0?t < T < ∞. Logarithmic convexity arguments are used to derive the inequalities from which such results can be deduced.     

A partition identity

Let n₁+n₂+?+n_m=n where the n_i's are integers (possibly negative or greater than n). Let p=(k₁,…,k_m), where k₁+k₂+?+k_m=k, be a partition of the nonnegative integer k into m nonnegative integers and let P denote the set of all such partitions. For m?2, we prove the combinatorial identity

$\text{∑}\text{p∈P}\text{∏}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{n}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{+1?k}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{k}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{=}\text{∑}\text{i?0}\text{j+m?2}\text{m?2}\text{n+1?k?2}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{k?2}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$

which implies the surprising result that the left side of the above equation depends on n but not on the n_i's.     

Enumeration of pairs of permutations

Let π = (a₁, a₂, …, a_n), ? = (b₁, b₂, …, b_n) be two permutations of $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {1, 2, …, n}}$. A rise of π is pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i < a_i+1; a fall is a pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i > a_i+1. Thus, for i = 1, 2, …, n ? 1, the two pairs a_i, a_i+1; b_i, b_i+1 are either both rises, both falls, the first a rise and the second a fall or the first a fall and the second a rise. These possibilities are denoted by RR, FF, RF, FR. The paper is concerned with the enumeration of pairs π, p with a given number of RR, FF, RF, FR. In particular if ω_n denotes the number of pairs with RR forbidden, it is proved that $\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}\text{=}\text{1}\text{?(z)}$, $\text{?(z) = ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{(-1)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$. More precisely if ω(n, k) denotes the number of pairs π, p with exactly k occurences of RR(or FF, RF, FR) then $\text{1 + ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$$\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{n?1}}{}_{\mathrm{k=0}}\text{ω(n, k)x}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(1 ? x)}\text{(?(z(1 ? x)) ? x)}$.     

On the simulation of shot noise and some other random variables

It is shown that the random voltage V_t resulting from pulses with independent random amplitude Y_i Poisson arrivals, and exponential decay, can be asymptotically represented, in the stationary case, by the following random variable; namely a sum of products of random variables:

$\text{W=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{∞}\text{U}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{,}$

where

$\text{U}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{=}\text{∏}\text{j=1}\text{i}\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta /\lambda }}\text{.}$

Here X_j are independent uniform random variables, β>0 is the decay parameter, λ>0 is the rate of the Poisson process.     

The maximal sizes of faces and vertices in an arrangement

Let A be an arragement of n lines in the plane. Suppose that F₁,…,F_r are faces of A and that V,…,V_s are vertices of A. Suppose also that each F_i is a (V_j) of the lines of A intersect at V_j. Then we show that

$\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{r}\text{t(F}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{+}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{s}\text{t(V}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{)?n+4}\text{r}\text{2}\text{+}\text{s}\text{2}\text{+ 2rs}$

.     

On the secondary zeta-functions

Using summability it is shown that $\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?2 (Λ(n) ? 1) n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(log n)}{}^{\mathrm{?8}}$ defines an entire function in the s-plane. Its asymptotic nature is found and a functional equation relating it to the series $\text{∑{i(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{? p)}}{}^{\mathrm{1?8}}$, Im p = γ > 0,is obtained where p = β + iγ are the nontrivial zeros of Riemann's zeta-function.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

Diagonal forms over finite fields

We shall establish for all finite fields GF(pⁿ) the following result of Chowla: given a positive integer m greater than one and the finite field GF(p), p a prime, such that x^m = ?1 is solvable in GF(p), then there exists an absolute positive constant c, $\text{c ≤}\text{10}\text{ln}\text{2}$, such that for each set of s nonzero elements a_i of GF(p), $\text{a}{}_1\text{x}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{+ ? + a}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$ has a non-trivial zero in GF(p) if s ≥ c ln m.