首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
We exhibit a second-order differential operator commuting with the reproducing kernel n ? 0T φn(λ) φn(μ)hn each time that {φn(λ)} is one of the classical orthogonal polynomials: Jacobi, Laguerre, Hermite and Bessel. This is the analog of a known property in the study of time and band-limited signals.  相似文献   

2.
In this paper we are constructing a recurrence relation of the form
i=0rωi(k)mk+i{λ} [f] = ω(k)
for integrals (called modified moments)
mk{λ}[f]df=?11 f(x)Ck(λ)(x)dx (k = 0,1,…)
in which Ck(λ) is the k-th Gegenbauer polynomial of order λ(λ > ?12), and f is a function satisfying the differential equation
i=0n Pi(x)f(i)(x) = p(x) (?1?x?1)
of order n, where p0, p1, …, pn ? 0 are polynomials, and mkλ[p] is known for every k. We give three methods of construction of such a recurrence relation. The first of them (called Method I) is optimum in a certain sense.  相似文献   

3.
It is known that the classical orthogonal polynomials satisfy inequalities of the form Un2(x) ? Un + 1(x) Un ? 1(x) > 0 when x lies in the spectral interval. These are called Turan inequalities. In this paper we will prove a generalized Turan inequality for ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials. Specifically if Pnλ(x) and Lnα(x) are the ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials and Fnλ(x) = Pnλ(x)Pnλ(1), Gnα(x) = Lnα(x)Lnα(0), then Fnα(x) Fnβ(x) ? Fn + 1α(x) Fn ? 1β(x) > 0, ? 1 < x < 1, ?12 < α ? β ? α + 1 and Gnα(x) Gnβ(x) ? Gn + 1α(x) Gn ? 1β(x) > 0, x > 0, 0 < α ? β ? α + 1. We also prove the inequality (n + 1) Fnα(x) Fnβ(x) ? nFn + 1α(x) Fn ? 1β(x) > An[Fnα(x)]2, ?1 < x < 1, ?12 < α ? β < α + 1, where An is a positive constant depending on α and β.  相似文献   

4.
Let m and vt, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral H = ⊕L2(vt) dm(t) and the operator (L?)(t, λ) = e?iλ?(t, λ) ? 2e?iλtT ?(s, x) e(s, t) dvs(x) dm(s) on H, where e(s, t) = exp ∫stTdvλ(θ) dm(λ). Let μt be the measure defined by T?(x) dμt(x) = ∫0tT ?(x) dvs dm(s) for all continuous ?, and let ?t(z) = exp[?∫ (e + z)(e ? z)?1t(gq)]. Call {vt} regular iff for all t, ¦?t(e)¦ = ¦?(e for 1 a.e.  相似文献   

5.
Real constant coefficient nth order elliptic operators, Q, which generate strongly continuous semigroups on L2(Rk) are analyzed in terms of the elementary generator,
A = (?n)(n2 ? 1)(n!)?1kj = 1?n?xjn
, for n even. Integral operators are defined using the fundamental solutions pn(x, t) to ut = Au and using real polynomials ql,…, qk on Rm by the formula, for q = (ql,…, qk),
(F(t)?)(x) = ∫
Rm
?(x + q(z)) Pn(z, t)dz
. It is determined when, strongly on L2(Rk),
etQ = limj → ∞ Ftjj
. If n = 2 or k = 1, this can always be done. Otherwise the symbol of Q must have a special form.  相似文献   

6.
7.
For an open set Ω ? RN, 1 ? p ? ∞ and λ ∈ R+, let W?pλ(Ω) denote the Sobolev-Slobodetzkij space obtained by completing C0(Ω) in the usual Sobolev-Slobodetzkij norm (cf. A. Pietsch, “r-nukleare Sobol. Einbett. Oper., Ellipt. Dgln. II,” Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1971, pp. 203–215). Choose a Banach ideal of operators U, 1 ? p, q ? ∞ and a quasibounded domain Ω ? RN. Theorem 1 of the note gives sufficient conditions on λ such that the Sobolev-imbedding map W?pλ(Ω) λ Lq(Ω) exists and belongs to the given Banach ideal U: Assume the quasibounded domain fulfills condition Ckl for some l > 0 and 1 ? k ? N. Roughly this means that the distance of any x ? Ω to the boundary ?Ω tends to zero as O(¦ x ¦?l) for ¦ x ¦ → ∞, and that the boundary consists of sufficiently smooth ?(N ? k)-dimensional manifolds. Take, furthermore, 1 ? p, q ? ∞, p > k. Then, if μ, ν are real positive numbers with λ = μ + v ∈ N, μ > λ S(U; p,q:N) and v > N/l · λD(U;p,q), one has that W?pλ(Ω) λ Lq(Ω) belongs to the Banach ideal U. Here λD(U;p,q;N)∈R+ and λS(U;p,q;N)∈R+ are the D-limit order and S-limit order of the ideal U, introduced by Pietsch in the above mentioned paper. These limit orders may be computed by estimating the ideal norms of the identity mappings lpnlqn for n → ∞. Theorem 1 in this way generalizes results of R. A. Adams and C. Clark for the ideals of compact resp. Hilbert-Schmidt operators (p = q = 2) as well as results on imbeddings over bounded domains.Similar results over general unbounded domains are indicated for weighted Sobolev spaces.As an application, in Theorem 2 an estimate is given for the rate of growth of the eigenvalues of formally selfadjoint, uniformly strongly elliptic differential operators with Dirichlet boundary conditions in L2(Ω), where Ω fulfills condition C1l.For an open set Ω in RN, let W?pλ(Ω) denote the Sobolev-Slobodetzkij space obtained by completing C0(Ω) in the usual Sobolev-Slobodetzkij norm, see below. Taking a fixed Banach ideal of operators and 1 ? p, q ? ∞, we consider quasibounded domains Ω in RN and give sufficient conditions on λ such that the Sobolev imbedding operator W?pλ(Ω) λ Lq(Ω) exists and belongs to the Banach ideal. This generalizes results of C. Clark and R. A. Adams for compact, respectively, Hilbert-Schmidt operators (p = q = 2) to general Banach ideals of operators, as well as results on imbeddings over bounded domains. Similar results over general unbounded domains may be proved for weighted Sobolev spaces. As an application, we give an estimate for the rate of growth of the eigenvalues of formally selfadjoint, uniformly strongly elliptic differential operators with Dirichlet boundary conditions in L2(Ω), where Ω is a quasibounded open set in RN.  相似文献   

8.
Let H = ?Δ + V, where the potential V is spherically symmetric and can be decomposed as a sum of a short-range and a long-range term, V(r) = VS(r) + VL. Let λ = lim supr→∞VL(r) < ∞ (we allow λ = ? ∞) and set λ+ = max(λ, 0). Assume that for some r0, VL(r) ?C2k(r0, ∞) and that there exists δ > 0 such that (ddr)jVL(r) · (λ+ ? VL(r) + 1)?1 = O(r?jδ), j = 1,…, 2k, as r → ∞. Assume further that 1(dr¦ VL(r)¦12) = ∞ and that 2 > 1. It is shown that: (a) The restriction of H to C(Rn) is essentially self-adjoint, (b) The essential spectrum of H contains the closure of (λ, ∞). (c) The part of H over (λ, ∞) is absolutely continuous.  相似文献   

9.
Let α(n1, n2) be the probability of classifying an observation from population Π1 into population Π2 using Fisher's linear discriminant function based on samples of size n1 and n2. A standard estimator of α, denoted by T1, is the proportion of observations in the first sample misclassified by the discriminant function. A modification of T1, denoted by T2, is obtained by eliminating the observation being classified from the calculation of the discriminant function. The UMVU estimators, T11 and T21, of ET1 = τ1(n1, n2) and ET2 = τ2(n1, n2) = α(n1 ? 1, n2) are derived for the case when the populations have multivariate normal distributions with common dispersion matrix. It is shown that T11 and T21 are nonincreasing functions of D2, the Mahalanobis sample distance. This result is used to derive the sampling distributions and moments of T11 and T21. It is also shown that α is a decreasing function of Δ2 = (μ1 ? μ2)′Σ?11 ? μ2). Hence, by truncating T11 and T21 (or any estimator) at the value of α for Σ = 0, new estimators are obtained which, for all samples, are as close or closer to α.  相似文献   

10.
This paper is a study of the distribution of eigenvalues of various classes of operators. In Section 1 we prove that the eigenvalues (λn(T)) of a p-absolutely summing operator, p ? 2, satisfy
n∈Nn(T)|p1pp(T).
This solves a problem of A. Pietsch. We give applications of this to integral operators in Lp-spaces, weakly singular operators, and matrix inequalities.In Section 2 we introduce the quasinormed ideal Π2(n), P = (p1, …, pn) and show that for TΠ2(n), 2 = (2, …, 2) ∈ Nn, the eigenvalues of T satisfy
i∈Ni(T)|2nn2n2(T).
More generally, we show that for TΠp(n), P = (p1, …, pn), pi ? 2, the eigenvalues are absolutely p-summable,
1p=i=1n1piandn∈Nn(T)|p1p?CpπnP(T).
We also consider the distribution of eigenvalues of p-nuclear operators on Lr-spaces.In Section 3 we prove the Banach space analog of the classical Weyl inequality, namely
n∈Nn(T)|p ? Cpn∈N αn(T)p
, 0 < p < ∞, where αn denotes the Kolmogoroff, Gelfand of approximation numbers of the operator T. This solves a problem of Markus-Macaev.Finally we prove that Hilbert space is (isomorphically) the only Banach space X with the property that nuclear operators on X have absolutely summable eigenvalues. Using this result we show that if the nuclear operators on X are of type l1 then X must be a Hilbert space.  相似文献   

11.
It is shown that if A?Ωn?{Jn} satisfies
nkσk(A)?(n?k+1)2 σk?1(A)
(k=1,2,…,n)
, where σk(A) denotes the sum of all kth order subpermanent of A, then Per[λJn+(1?λ)A] is strictly decreasing in the interval 0<λ<1.  相似文献   

12.
13.
14.
A spectral representation for the self-adjoint Schrödinger operator H = ?Δ + V(x), x? R3, is obtained, where V(x) is a long-range potential: V(x) = O(¦ x ¦?(12)), grad V(x) = O(¦ x ¦?(32)), ΛV(x) = O(¦ x s?) (δ > 0), Λ being the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the unit sphere Ω. Namely, we shall construct a unitary operator F from PL2(R3) onto L2((0, ∞); L2(Ω)), P being the orthogonal projection onto the absolutely continuous subspace for H, such that for any Borel function α(λ),
(α(H)(Pf,g)=0 (α(λ)(Ff)(λ),(Fg)(λ))L2(ω) dλ
.  相似文献   

15.
We study the weight distribution of irreducible cyclic (n, k) codeswith block lengths n = n1((q1 ? 1)/N), where N|q ? 1, gcd(n1,N) = 1, and gcd(l,N) = 1. We present the weight enumerator polynomial, A(z), when k = n1l, k = (n1 ? 1)l, and k = 2l. We also show how to find A(z) in general by studying the generator matrix of an (n1, m) linear code, V1d over GF(qd) where d = gcd (ordn1(q), l). Specifically we study A(z) when V1d is a maximum distance separable code, a maximal shiftregister code, and a semiprimitive code. We tabulate some numbers Aμ which completely determine the weight distributionof any irreducible cyclic (n1(21 ? 1), k) code over GF(2) for all n1 ? 17.  相似文献   

16.
For a(1) ? a(2) ? ··· ? a(n) ? 0, b(1) ? b(2) ? ··· ? b(n) ? 0, the ordered values of ai, bi, i = 1, 2,…, n, m fixed, m ? n, and p ? 1 it is shown that
1naibi ? 1map(i)1p1m?k?1 bq(i)+bq[m?k](k+1)qp1q
where 1p + 1q = 1, b[j] = b(j) + b(j + 1) + ··· + b(n), and k is the integer such that b(m ? k ? 1) ? b[m ? k](k + 1) and b(m ? k) < b[m ? k + 1]k. The inequality is shown to be sharp. When p < 1 and a(i)'s are in increasing order then the inequality is reversed.  相似文献   

17.
If k is a perfect field of characteristic p ≠ 0 and k(x) is the rational function field over k, it is possible to construct cyclic extensions Kn over k(x) such that [K : k(x)] = pn using the concept of Witt vectors. This is accomplished in the following way; if [β1, β2,…, βn] is a Witt vector over k(x) = K0, then the Witt equation yp ? y = β generates a tower of extensions through Ki = Ki?1(yi) where y = [y1, y2,…, yn]. In this paper, it is shown that there exists an alternate method of generating this tower which lends itself better for further constructions in Kn. This alternate generation has the form Ki = Ki?1(yi); yip ? yi = Bi, where, as a divisor in Ki?1, Bi has the form (Bi) = qΠpjλj. In this form q is prime to Πpjλj and each λj is positive and prime to p. As an application of this, the alternate generation is used to construct a lower-triangular form of the Hasse-Witt matrix of such a field Kn over an algebraically closed field of constants.  相似文献   

18.
We show how inequalities of the type ∥F∥p ? C(p, q) a1 + (1p)? (1q) ∥ F ′ ∥q′ when F(0) = 0 can be used to find lower bounds of the first eigenvalue of the integral equation F(z) = λ0ak(s, z)F(s) ds.  相似文献   

19.
For a symmetric space GK of compact type, the highest-weight vectors for representations of G occurring in L2(GK) become heavily concentrated near certain submanifolds of GK as the highest weight goes to infinity. This fact is applied to obtain estimates for the spectral measures of the operators = PλqPλ, where Pλ : L2(GK) → Vλ is an orthogonal projection onto a G-irreducible summand, and q: G/KR is a continuous function acting on L2(GK) by multiplication.  相似文献   

20.
Let Σ be an n × n positive definite matrix with eigenvalues λ1λ2 ≥ … ≥ λn > 0 and let M = {x, y | x?Rn, y?Rn, x ≠ 0, y ≠ 0, xy = 0}. Then for x, y in M, we have that x′Σy(x′Σxy′Σy)121 ? λn)1 + λn) and the inequality is sharp. If
∑=11122122
is a partitioning of Σ, let θ1 be the largest canonical correlation coefficient. The above result yields θ11 ? λn)1 + λn).  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号