Improved method for extraction of aroma compounds in aged brandies and aqueous alcoholic wood extracts using ultrasound

This work presents a rapid method for dichloromethane extraction of aroma compounds from brandies and aqueous-alcoholic wood extracts, in brandy-like ageing conditions, using ultrasound. The dichloromethane extracts were injected in split mode on a gas chromatographic (GC) system, separated on a DB-WAX capillary column and detected by flame ionisation. The method allowed satisfactory quantification of 37 volatile compounds in brandies (alcohols, esters, acids, furanics, aldehydes and phenols) and 16 volatile compounds in aqueous-alcoholic oak extracts. Linear responses were obtained (0.99-1.00). The repeatability and the detection and quantification limits were also evaluated. The analysis of spiked samples showed that matrix effects do not affect the method performance for the majority of the volatile compounds analysed.     

Analysis of wine primary aroma compounds by stir bar sorptive extraction

Due to the great importance of some primary aroma compounds on wine quality, these compounds which includes terpenes, C₁₃-norisoprenoids and C₆ compounds, have been analyzed by stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) followed by a thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. The stir bar sorptive extraction method was optimized in terms of temperature, time, pH and NaCl addition. The best SBSE sorption kinetics for the target analytes were obtained after submitting the solutions to 60 °C during 90 min. The addition of sodium chloride did not enhance the volatile extraction. The method proposed showed good linearity over the concentration range tested, with correlation coefficients higher than 0.98 for all the analytes. The reproducibility and repeatability of the method was estimated between 0.22 and 9.11%. The detection and quantification limits of all analytes were lower than their respective olfactory threshold values. The application of this SBSE method revealed that monovarietal white wines were clearly separated by two canonic discriminating functions when grape varieties were used as differentiating variable, the first of which explained 98.4% of the variance. The compounds which contributed most to the differentiation were limonene, linalool, nerolidol and 1-hexanol.     

Analysis of organic sulfur compounds in wine aroma

Sulfur-containing compounds in wines have been extensively studied because of their effect on wine aroma. The aim of this paper was to give an overview on the analytical methods developed to determine them in wines with special emphasis on gas chromatographic methods, as well as the results obtained. In addition, the problems occurring in application of the common extraction procedures, such as liquid-liquid extraction, static and dynamic headspace and solid-phase microextraction, are presented and discussed.     

Determination of beer aroma compounds using headspace solid-phase microcolumn extraction

A rapid sampling technique for the analysis of beer aroma compounds is described. The headspace (10 ml) is passed through the microcolumn filled with 5 mg of Tenax TA and thermally desorbed in a modified GC inlet (modification is described). Eight compounds (from acetaldehyde to 2-phenylethanol) in four beer samples were analyzed. The correlation coefficients (r²), repeatability (RSD) and limits of detection (LOD) were 0.9973-0.9994, 2.1-6.9% and 0.00002-0.13 mg/l, respectively. The methodology can be useful for routine beer sample analysis.     

Volatile compounds responsible for aroma of Jutrzenka liquer wine

Jutrzenka is a sweet liquer wine produced in Poland from the grape variety of the same name, developed in Poland to withstand the harsh climate of winery regions. Jutrzenka wine has a characteristic aroma with strong fruity and flowery notes, which make it unique among other liquer wines as demonstrated in sensory profile analysis. The work was aimed at characterization of volatile compounds in this wine, with the emphasis on characterization of compounds responsible for its unique aroma. Gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) was applied to identify the key odorants using aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) approach. To facilitate free and bound terpenes and C(13)-norisoprenoids identification solid phase extraction (SPE) was used followed by GC/MS. Among identified key odorants β-damascenone was the compound having the highest FD (4096), followed by isoamyl alcohol, 4-mercapto-4-methyl-2-pentanone (FD=2048), methional, linalool, ethyl decanoate (FD=1024) and ethyl hexanoate, furaneol (FD=512). Other significant compounds were ethyl 2-methyl propanoate, ethyl 2-methylbutanoate and phenyl ethyl alcohol. Determination of odor activity values (OAV) showed the highest values for β-damascenone (566), 4-mercapto-4-methyl-2-pentanone (288) ethyl hexanoate (32) and linalool (7). Jutrzenka exhibited also a rich profile of free, and to lesser extent bound terpenes.     

Beyond the characterization of wine aroma compounds: looking for analytical approaches in trying to understand aroma perception during wine consumption

The volatile compounds present in wines are responsible for the quality of the wine aroma. The analysis of these compounds requires different analytical techniques depending on the type of compounds and their concentration. The importance at sensorial level of each compound should be evaluated by using olfactometric techniques and reconstitution and omission studies. In addition, wine aroma is influenced by other factors such as wine matrix, which could affect the compounds’ volatility, decreasing or increasing their concentration in the headspace above the wine. Moreover, when a wine is consumed, several oral physiological variables could affect aroma perception. The focus of this review is to outline the most recent advances in wine aroma analysis and the most innovative techniques in trying to elucidate the main factors that influence wine aroma perception during consumption.     

Ultrasound-assisted extraction of volatile compounds from wine samples: optimisation of the method

This study describes a liquid–liquid extraction technique for extracting volatile compounds from wine using dichloromethane and ultrasounds. This technique permits the simultaneous extraction of different samples with high reproducibility. After the preliminary tests, several parameters (sample volume, solvent volume and extraction time) were optimised using a factorial design to obtain the most relevant variables. The analytical characteristics were obtained such as calibration graphs, detection limits ranging from 0.0238 mg L⁻¹ for 1-pentanol to 0.261 mg L⁻¹ for octanoic acid, quantification limits and relative standard deviation from 2.1 to 6.2%. Extraction yields were calculated giving a range 9.16–1.2%. The optimised conditions were applied to the extraction of samples of young wines from the Denominación de Origen Calificada Rioja category using gas chromatography and a flame ionisation detector.     

Optimization and validation of headspace sorptive extraction for the analysis of volatile compounds in wine vinegars

Quantification of aroma compounds in wine vinegars is challenging due to the complexity of the matrix and the low concentrations expected. A method for the determination of volatile compounds in wine vinegars employing headspace sorptive extraction-thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HSSE-TD-GC-MS) was developed. A central composite design was used to optimize the sampling condition. The proposed method was successfully validated and low detection and quantification limits was obtained. The application of the proposed methodology allows the determination of 53 compounds in different wine vinegars (red, Sherry). Five of them have been detected in wine vinegars for the first time.     

Determination of wine aroma compounds by dehydration followed by GC/MS

A new extraction method for the analysis of the volatile fraction of white and red wines has been developed and validated. A dehydration step with MgSO4 separated an aroma compounds-rich alcoholic-glycerine layer. Spiked samples showed good recoveries in the range between 75 and 120% with CVmax% of 17, except for 2-phenylethanol and y-butyrolactone for which recoveries in red wines were under 60%, and for monoethylsuccinate, where recoveries averaged 50 and 60% in white and red wines, respectively. Method repeatability and intermediate precision showed good CVmax% with minimum and maximum values between 7.7 and 24, and between 18.7 and 25.0, respectively. The average determination coefficients were greater than 0.99 with CVmax% of 13. The instrumental LOD and LOQ were, in all cases, under 0.05 mg/L, except for 2,3 butanediol (0.20 mg/L). Overall, the presence of wine matrix affected aroma compounds responses in GC/MS analysis. These observations indicate that the use of a matrix-matched calibration curve is mandatory to obtain reliable quantitative data.     

Effect of maturation in small oak casks on the volatility of red wine aroma compounds

Wood maturation of red wine produces complex interactions between oak extracted compounds and pre-existing components in wine. Wood contributes with some aroma volatiles; but the whole volatile fraction, including the volatiles extracted from grape or produced during fermentation, could be involved in interactions with the non-volatile fraction. Samples of red wine with increasing time of wood contact, matured in 25 l casks of new American oak, were analysed on their volatile composition both in solution and headspace, and phenolic components. There was an increase of acetic acid and acetate esters as the time of wood contact increased. On the other hand, ethyl esters decreased as the time in wood increased. Some volatiles showed different behaviour when comparing their relationship between headspace and solution from two different casks, even though they were treated as replicates. This different evolution among casks was also consistent with different evolution of phenolic compounds, suggesting that there was an interaction among the volatile fraction and phenolic components.     

Lanthanides determination in red wine using ultrasound assisted extraction,flow injection,aerosol desolvation and ICP-MS

This paper deals with the determination of the fourteen naturally occurring elements of the lanthanide series in red wine. Ultrasound (US) was used for sample preparation prior lanthanides determination using ICP-MS. Flow injection (FI) and pneumatic nebulization/aerosol desolvation were used for nebulization of aliquots of 50 μL of sample and its subsequent transportation to plasma. Sample preparation procedures, matrix interference and time of sonication were evaluated. Better results for lanthanides in red wine were obtained by sonication with US probe for 90 s and sample 10-fold diluted. The limits of detection of La, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Pr, Eu, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Lu and Yb were 6.57, 10.8, 9.97, 9.38, 2.71, 1.29, 1.22, 0.52, 2.35, 0.96, 2.30, 0.45, 0.24 and 1.35 ng L⁻¹, respectively. Red wines of different varieties from three countries of South America were discriminated according to the country of origin by means of multivariate analysis of lanthanides concentration.     

Classification of white wine aromas with an electronic nose

This paper reports the use of a tin dioxide multisensor array based electronic nose for recognition of 29 typical aromas in white wine. Headspace technique has been used to extract aroma of the wine. Multivariate analysis, including principal component analysis (PCA) as well as probabilistic neural networks (PNNs), has been used to identify the main aroma added to the wine. The results showed that in spite of the strong influence of ethanol and other majority compounds of wine, the system could discriminate correctly the aromatic compounds added to the wine with a minimum accuracy of 97.2%.     

Influence of sorption and diffusion of aroma compounds in silicone rubber on their extraction by pervaporation

Pervaporation was used to extract aroma compounds from dilute aqueous solutions. The use of a stirred cell allowed the reduction of the boundary layer effect which can be estimated using a mass transfer correlation. A resistance-in-series model was used to describe the flux of organic compounds through a silicone membrane. Calculation of the membrane resistance required the determination of the solubility and diffusion coefficients of the aroma substances in the polymer. These two characteristics were obtained by measuring the quantities of the aroma sorbed on the silicone at equilibrium and by studying the kinetics of sorption. At low concentration ranges, both characteristics were constant. They can be related to the hydrophobicity, the molar volume and the flux of the substances through the silicone membrane during pervaporation.     

Headspace solid-phase microextraction of sulphides and disulphides using Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane fibers in the analysis of wine aroma

Headspace solid-phase microextraction was applied to gas chromatography coupled to flame photometric detection to develop a method for analysing volatile sulphides and disulphides in wine. The Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane-coated silica fiber was tested and different parameters such as presampling time, ionic strength, stirring, headspace volume, ethanol concentration, time and temperature of extraction were optimized to make extraction as efficient as possible. The optimized conditions enabled limits of detection to be obtained at the ng/l levels. The fiber tested has a strong affinity for the sulphur compounds studied and enables these analytes to be quantitatively determined in wines. The Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane-coated fiber is more efficient at extracting than fibers such as those which are polydimethylsiloxane-coated and polyacrylate-coated, but its repeatability is worse. The overall process was successfully applied to identify and quantify sulphur compounds in white, red, rose and vintage wines.     

Speeding up of a three-stage sequential extraction method for metal speciation using focused ultrasound

The three-stage sequential extraction procedure, proposed by the European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR), has been applied for speciation of copper, chromium, nickel, lead and zinc in a sludge sample collected from an urban wastewater treatment plant. The conventional BCR sequential extraction method has been modified, in each stage, applying ultrasonic energy by means of a probe (handling at an adequate sonication power and time) in order to shorten the required operation time. Extractable metal contents obtained by both the conventional and the accelerated ultrasonic extraction method, were measured by Flame-Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Results obtained in each fraction by both methods were statistically compared (P=0.95) for all the studied elements and no significant differences were found except for chromium and zinc in the third fraction (oxidisable). For all metals the extraction percentage was>95%. The proposed accelerated sequential extraction method could be a valid alternative to the conventional shaking with a much shorter operating time.     

Comparison of four extraction methods for analysis of volatile hop‐derived aroma compounds in beer

The volatile organic compound profile in beer is derived from hops, malt, yeast, and interactions between the ingredients, making it very diverse and complex. Due to the range and diversity of the volatile organic compounds present, the choice of the extraction method is extremely important for optimal sensitivity and selectivity. This study compared four extraction methods for hop‐derived compounds in beer late hopped with Nelson Sauvin. Extraction capacity and variation were compared for headspace solid‐phase micro extraction, stir bar sorptive extraction, headspace sorptive extraction, and solvent‐assisted flavor evaporation. Generally, stir bar sorptive extraction was better suited for acids, headspace sorptive extraction for esters and aldehydes, while headspace solid‐phase microextraction was less sensitive overall, extracting 40% fewer compounds. Solvent‐assisted flavor evaporation with dichloromethane was not suitable for the extraction of hop‐derived volatile organic compounds in beer, as the profile was strongly skewed towards alcohols and acids. Overall, headspace sorptive extraction is found to be best suited, closely followed by stir bar sorptive extraction.