The torsion group of a field defined by radicals

Let $\text{L}\text{F}$ be a finite separable extension, $\text{L}{}^1\text{= L{0}}$, and $\text{T(}\text{L}{}^1\text{F}{}^1\text{)}$ the torsion subgroup of $\text{L}{}^1\text{F}{}^1$. When $\text{L}\text{F}$ is an abelian extension $\text{T(}\text{L}{}^1\text{F}{}^1\text{)}$ is explicitly determined. This information is used to study the structure of $\text{T(}\text{L}{}^1\text{F}{}^1\text{)}$. In particular, $\text{T(}\text{F(α)}{}^1\text{F}{}^1\text{)}$ when a^m = a ∈ F is explicitly determined.     

On Fourier transform of generalized Brownian functionals

Let $\text{(L}{}^2\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>B</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ and $\text{(L}{}^2\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>b</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ be the spaces of generalized Brownian functionals of the white noises ? and ?, respectively. A Fourier transform from $\text{(L}{}^2\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>B</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ into $\text{(L}{}^2\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>b</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$ is defined by ??(?) = ∫$\text{S}$¹: exp[?i ∫_$\text{R}$?(t) ?(t) dt]: ${}_{\mathrm{<mtext>b</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}\text{?(}\text{B}\text{?}\text{) dμ(}\text{B}\text{?}$), where : :${}_{\mathrm{<mtext>b</mtext><mtext>?</mtext>}}$ denotes the renormalization with respect to ? and μ is the standard Gaussian measure on the space $\text{S}$¹ of tempered distributions. It is proved that the Fourier transform carries ?(t)-differentiation into multiplication by i?(t). The integral representation and the action of?? as a generalized Brownian functional are obtained. Some examples of Fourier transform are given.     

Rôle de l'espace de Besov B∞−1,∞ dans le contrôle de l'explosion éventuelle en temps fini des solutions régulières des équations de Navier–Stokes

Let $\text{u∈C([0,T}{}^1\text{[;L}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ be a maximal solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. We prove that u is C^∞ on $\text{]0,T}{}^1\text{[×}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ and there exists a constant $\text{ε}{}_1\text{>0}$, which depends only on n, such that if $\text{T}{}^1$ is finite then, for all $\text{ω∈S(}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{,}$ we have To cite this article: R. May, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 336 (2003).     

Derivations on a C1-algebra and its double dual

Let A be a C¹-algebra and X a Banach A-module. The module action of A on X gives rise to module actions of $\text{A}{}^7$ on $\text{X}{}^1$ and $\text{X}{}^7$, and derivations of A into X (resp. $\text{X}{}^1$) extend to derivations of $\text{A}{}^7$ into $\text{X}{}^7$ (resp. $\text{X}{}^1$). If A is nuclear, and X is a dual Banach A-module with $\text{X}{}^1$ weakly sequentially complete, then every derivation of A into X is inner. Under the same hypothesis on A, the extension to the finite part of $\text{A}{}^7$ of any derivation of A into any dual Banach A-module is inner, as are all derivations of A into $\text{A}{}^1$. Every derivation of a semifinite von Neumann algebra into its predual is inner.     

Properties of certain algebras between L∞and H∞

The main result of this paper is that if F is a closed subset of the unit circle, then $\text{(H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{+ L}{}_{\mathrm{F}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{)}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$ is an M-ideal of $\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$. Consequently, if $\text{? ∈ L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$ then ? has a closest element in H^∞ + L_F^∞. Furthermore, if $\text{¦F¦ >0}\text{then}\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{+ L}{}_{\mathrm{F}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{)}$ is not the dual of any Banach space.     

All directed BIBDs with k = 3 exist

A directed BIBD with parameters ($\text{υ, b, r, k, λ}{}^1$) is a BIBD with parameters ($\text{υ, b, r, k, 2λ}{}^1$) in which each ordered pair of varieties occurs together in exactly $\text{λ}{}^1$ blocks. It is shown that $\text{λ}{}^1\text{υ(υ ? 1) ≡ 0}$ (mod 3) is a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a directed ($\text{υ, b, r, k, λ}{}^1$) BIBD with k = 3.     

Sobolev inequalities with remainder terms

The usual Sobolev inequality in $\text{R}$ⁿ, n ? 3, asserts that , with S_n being the sharp constant. This paper is concerned, instead, with functions restricted to bounded domains Ω ? $\text{R}$ⁿ. Two kinds of inequalities are established: (i) If ? = 0 on ?Ω, then with $\text{p =}\text{2}{}^1\text{2}$ and with $\text{q =}\text{n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. (ii) If ? ≠ 0 on ?Ω, then with $\text{q =}\text{2(n ? 1)}\text{(n ? 2)}$. Some further results and open problems in this area are also presented.     

Loeb-measurable solutions to 1finite games

Let ¹M be a denumerately comprehensive enlargement of a set-theoretic structure sufficient to model R. If F is an internal ¹finite subset of ¹N such that $\text{F = {1,…,γ}, γ?}{}^1\text{N?N}$, we define a class of ¹finite cooperative games having the form $\text{Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν) = 〈F,A(F),}{}^1\text{ν〉}$, where A(F) is the internal algebra of the internal subsets of F, and ${}^1\text{ν}$ is a set-function with $\text{Dom}{}^1\text{ν=A(F)}$, $\text{Rng}{}^1\text{ν =}{}^1\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{+}}$, and ${}^1\text{ν(Ø) = 0}$. If $\text{SI(}{}^1\text{ν)}$ is the space of S-imputations of a game Γ_F(¹ν) such that ${}^1\text{ν(F)<η}$, for some $\text{η?}{}^1\text{N}$, then we prove that $\text{SI(}{}^1\text{ν)}$ contains two nonempty subsets: $\text{QK(Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν))}$ and $\text{SM}{}_1\text{(Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν))}$, termed the quasi-kernel and S-bargaining set, respectively. Both $\text{QK(Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν))}$ and $\text{SM}{}_1\text{(Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν))}$ are external solution concepts for games of the form Γ_F (¹ν) and are defined in terms of predicates that are approximate in infinitesimal terms. Furthermore, if L(Θ) is the Loeb space generated by the ¹finitely additive measure space 〈F, A(F), U_F〉, and if a game Γ_F(¹ν) has a nonatomic representation $\text{ψ(}{}^1\text{ν}{}^{\mathrm{?0}}\text{)}$ on L(Θ) with respect to S-bounded transformations, then the standard part of any element in $\text{QK(Γ}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(}{}^1\text{ν))}$ is Loeb-measurable and belongs to the quasi-kernel of $\text{ψ(}{}^1\text{ν}{}^{\mathrm{?0}}\text{)}$ defined in standard terms.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

Un analogue d'un théorème de Hardy pour la transformation de DunklAn analogue of Hardy's theorem for the Dunkl transform

In this Note we give a generalization of Hardy's theorem for the Dunkl transform $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{D}}$ on $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{d}}$. More precisely, for all a>0, b>0 and p,q∈[1,+∞], we determine the measurable functions f such that and , where $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{(}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{d}}\text{)}$ are the L^p spaces associated with the Dunkl transform. To cite this article: L. Gallardo, K. Trimèche, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 334 (2002) 849–854.     

A sharp inequality for Sobolev functionsUne inégalité dans un espace de Sobolev

Let N?5, a>0, $\text{Ω}$ be a smooth bounded domain in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{N}}$, $\text{2}{}^1\text{=}\text{2N}\text{N?2}$, $\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{\#}}\text{=}\text{2(N?1)}\text{N?2}$ and 6u6²=|?u|₂²+a|u|₂². We prove there exists an α₀>0 such that, for all $\text{u∈}\text{H}{}^1\text{(Ω)?{0}}$,

This inequality implies Cherrier's inequality. To cite this article: P.M. Girão, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 334 (2002) 105–108     

Invariant subspaces of certain subnormal operators

Let T be a subnormal, nonnormal operator on a Hilbert space and suppose that the point spectrum of $\text{T}{}^1$ is empty. Then there exist vectors x ≠ 0 for which $\text{(T}{}^1\text{? zI)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{x}$ exists and is weakly continuous for all z. It is shown that under certain conditions, the Cauchy integral of this vector function taken around an appropriate contour, not necessarily lying in the resolvent set of $\text{T}{}^1$, leads to a proper (nontrivial) invariant subspace of $\text{T}{}^1$.     

Votes and a half-binomial

In two party elections with popular vote ratio $\text{p}\text{q}\text{,}\text{1}\text{2}\text{≤p=1 ?q}$, a theoretical model suggests replacing the so-called MacMahon cube law approximation $\text{(}\text{p}\text{q}\text{)}{}^3$, for the ratio $\text{P}\text{Q}$ of candidates elected, by the ratio $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(q)}$ of the two half sums in the binomial expansion of (p+q)^2k+1 for some k. This ratio is nearly $\text{(}\text{p}\text{q}\text{)}{}^3$ when k = 6. The success probability $\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)=(}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{(p}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{+q}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}$ for the power law $\text{(}\text{p}\text{q}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{?}\text{P}\text{Q}$ is shown to so closely approximate $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)=Σ}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(}{}_{\mathrm{r}}{}^{\mathrm{2k+1}}\text{)p}{}^{\mathrm{2k+1?r}}\text{q}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$, if we choose $\text{a = a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(2k+1)!}\text{4}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{k!k!}$, that $\text{1≤}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}\text{≤1.01884086}$ for $\text{k≥1}\text{if}\text{1}\text{2}\text{≤p≤1}$. Computationally, we avoid large binomial coefficients in computing $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}$ for k>22 by expressing $\text{2?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)?1}$ as the sum $\text{(p?q) Σ}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(4pq)}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(2s+1)}$, whose terms decrease by the factors $\text{(4pq)(1?}\text{1}\text{2s}\text{)}$. Setting K = 4k+3, we compute a_k for the large k using a continued fraction $\text{πa}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^2\text{=}\text{K+1}{}^2\text{(}\text{2K+3}{}^2\text{(}\text{2K+5}{}^2\text{(2K+…)}\text{)}\text{)}$ derived from the ratio of π to the finite Wallis product approximation.     

W1,p-quasiconvexity and variational problems for multiple integrals

Variational problems for the multiple integral $\text{I}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\text{(u) = ∝}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\text{g(▽u(x))dx}$, where $\text{Ω?R}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$ and $\text{u:Ω→R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ are studied. A new condition on g, called W^1,p-quasiconvexity is introduced which generalizes in a natural way the quasiconvexity condition of C. B. Morrey, it being shown in particular to be necessary for sequential weak lower semicontinuity of $\text{I}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}$ in $\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{1,p}}\text{(Ω;R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ and for the existence of minimizers for certain related integrals. Counterexamples are given concerning the weak continuity properties of Jacobians in $\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{1,p}}\text{(Ω;R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, p ? n = m. An existence theorem for nonlinear elastostatics is proved under optimal growth hypotheses.     

Sur l'équation divu=fOn the equation divu=f

The main result is the following. Let $\text{Ω}$ be a bounded Lipschitz domain in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{d}}$, d?2. Then for every $\text{f∈}\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{d}}\text{(Ω)}$ with ∫f=0, there exists a solution $\text{u∈}\text{C}{}^0\text{(}\text{Ω}\text{)∩}\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{1,d}}\text{(Ω)}$ of the equation divu=f in $\text{Ω}$, satisfying in addition u=0 on $\text{?Ω}$ and the estimate

where C depends only on $\text{Ω}$. However one cannot choose u depending linearly on f. To cite this article: J. Bourgain, H. Brezis, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 334 (2002) 973–976.     

Critical exponents for the Pucci's extremal operatorsLes exposants critiques pour l'opérateur extrémal de Pucci

In this Note we present some results on the existence of radially symmetric solutions for the nonlinear elliptic equation

(1)$\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda ,</mtext><mtext>\Lambda </mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{(D}{}^2\text{u)+u}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{=0,u?0}\text{in}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{.}$

Here N?3, p>1 and $\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda ,</mtext><mtext>\Lambda </mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$ denotes the Pucci's extremal operators with parameters 0<λ?Λ. The goal is to describe the solution set as function of the parameter p. We find critical exponents $\text{1<p}{}^{\mathrm{s}}{}_{\mathrm{+}}\text{<p}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{+}}\text{<p}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{+}}$, that satisfy: (i) If $\text{1<p<p}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{+}}$ then there is no nontrivial solution of ($\text{1}$). (ii) If $\text{p=p}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{+}}$ then there is a unique fast decaying solution of ($\text{1}$). (iii) If $\text{p}{}^1\text{<p?p}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{+}}$ then there is a unique pseudo-slow decaying solution to ($\text{1}$). (iv) If p^p₊<p then there is a unique slow decaying solution to ($\text{1}$). Similar results are obtained for the operator $\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda ,</mtext><mtext>\Lambda </mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$. To cite this article: P.L. Felmer, A. Quaas, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 335 (2002) 909–914.     

Nonlinear “double porosity” type modelUn modèle non linéaire de type double porosité

We consider a variational problem in a bounded domain $\text{Ω=}\text{F}{}^{\mathrm{(\epsilon )}}\text{∪}\text{M}{}^{\mathrm{(\epsilon )}}$ with a microstructure $\text{F}{}^{\mathrm{(\epsilon )}}$ which is not in general periodic; a^ε=a^ε(x) is of order 1 in $\text{F}{}^{\mathrm{(\epsilon )}}$ and as ε→0. A homogenized model is constructed. To cite this article: L. Pankratov, A. Piatnitski, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 334 (2002) 435–440.     

Representation of linear functionals on a class of normed Köthe spaces

Under the condition that $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{\theta ,s}}{}^1$, (the set of singular functionals on a normed Köthe space L_θ) is an abstract L-space, it is proved in this paper that there exists a set of purely finitely additive measures $\text{M}$_θ such that $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{\theta ,s}}{}^1$? holds. It follows that $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{\theta ,s}}{}^1$ is an abstract L-space if and only if $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{\theta ,s}}{}^1$ is Riesz isomorphic and isometric with a band in $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{\infty ,s}}{}^1$.