Strong reciprocity and strong consistency in pairwise comparison matrix with fuzzy elements

The decision making problem considered in this paper is to rank n alternatives from the best to the worst, using the information given by the decision maker in the form of an \(n\times n\) pairwise comparison matrix. Here, we deal with pairwise comparison matrices with fuzzy elements. Fuzzy elements of the pairwise comparison matrix are applied whenever the decision maker is not sure about the value of his/her evaluation of the relative importance of elements in question. We investigate pairwise comparison matrices with elements from abelian linearly ordered group (alo-group) over a real interval. The concept of reciprocity and consistency of pairwise comparison matrices with fuzzy elements have been already studied in the literature. Here, we define stronger concepts, namely the strong reciprocity and strong consistency of pairwise comparison matrices with fuzzy intervals as the matrix elements (PCF matrices), derive the necessary and sufficient conditions for strong reciprocity and strong consistency and investigate their properties as well as some consequences to the problem of ranking the alternatives.     

Estimation of missing judgments in AHP pairwise matrices using a neural network-based model

Selecting relevant features to make a decision and expressing the relationships between these features is not a simple task. The decision maker must precisely define the alternatives and criteria which are more important for the decision making process. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) uses hierarchical structures to facilitate this process. The comparison is realized using pairwise matrices, which are filled in according to the decision maker judgments. Subsequently, matrix consistency is tested and priorities are obtained by calculating the matrix principal eigenvector. Given an incomplete pairwise matrix, two procedures must be performed: first, it must be completed with suitable values for the missing entries and, second, the matrix must be improved until a satisfactory level of consistency is reached. Several methods are used to fill in missing entries for incomplete pairwise matrices with correct comparison values. Additionally, once pairwise matrices are complete and if comparison judgments between pairs are not consistent, some methods must be used to improve the matrix consistency and, therefore, to obtain coherent results. In this paper a model based on the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural network is presented. Given an AHP pairwise matrix, this model is capable of completing missing values and improving the matrix consistency at the same time.     

A heuristic method to rectify intransitive judgments in pairwise comparison matrices

This paper investigates the effects of intransitive judgments on the consistency of pairwise comparison matrices. Statistical evidence regarding the occurrence of intransitive judgements in pairwise matrices of acceptable consistency is gathered by using a Monte-Carlo simulation, which confirms that relatively high percentage of comparison matrices, satisfying Saaty’s CR criterion are ordinally inconsistent. It is also shown that ordinal inconsistency does not necessarily decrease in the group aggregation process, in contrast with cardinal inconsistency. A heuristic algorithm is proposed to improve ordinal consistency by identifying and eliminating intransitivities in pairwise comparison matrices. The proposed algorithm generates near-optimal solutions and outperforms other tested approaches with respect to computation time.     

Fuzzified AHP in the evaluation of scientific monographs

Fuzzification of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is of great interest to researchers since it is a frequently used method for coping with complex decision making problems. There have been many attempts to fuzzify the AHP. We focus particularly on the construction of fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices and on obtaining fuzzy weights of objects from them subsequently. We review the fuzzification of the geometric mean method for obtaining fuzzy weights of objects from fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices. We illustrate here the usefulness of the fuzzified AHP on a real-life problem of the evaluation of quality of scientific monographs in university environment. The benefits of the presented evaluation methodology and its suitability for quality assessment of R&D results in general are discussed. When the task of quality assessment in R&D is considered, an important role is played by peer-review evaluation. Evaluations provided by experts in the peer-review process have a high level of subjectivity and can be expected in a linguistic form. New decision-support methods (or adaptations of classic methods) well suited to deal with such inputs, to capture the consistency of experts’ preferences and to restrict the subjectivity to an acceptable level are necessary. A new consistency condition is therefore defined here to be used for expertly defined fuzzy pairwise comparison matrices.     

A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP

Tests of consistency for the pair-wise comparison matrices have been studied extensively since AHP was introduced by Saaty in 1970s. However, existing methods are either too complicated to be applied in the revising process of the inconsistent comparison matrix or are difficult to preserve most of the original comparison information due to the use of a new pair-wise comparison matrix. Those methods might work for AHP but not for ANP as the comparison matrix of ANP needs to be strictly consistent. To improve the consistency ratio, this paper proposes a simple method, which combines the theorem of matrix multiplication, vectors dot product, and the definition of consistent pair-wise comparison matrix, to identify the inconsistent elements. The correctness of the proposed method is proved mathematically. The experimental studies have also shown that the proposed method is accurate and efficient in decision maker’s revising process to satisfy the consistency requirements of AHP/ANP.     

A quality control approach to consistency paradoxes in AHP

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) requires a specific consistency check of the pairwise comparisons in order to ensure that the decision maker is being neither inconsistent nor random in his or her pairwise comparisons. However, there are many situations where the decision maker has been reasonable, logical and non-random in making the pairwise comparison and yet will fail the consistency check. This paper argues against the use of the standard consistency check. If a consistency test is to be done, a quality control approach is recommended.     

Convergence properties and practical estimation of the probability of rank reversal in pairwise comparisons for multi-criteria decision making problems

In this paper, we address the impact of uncertainty introduced when the experts complete pairwise comparison matrices, in the context of multi-criteria decision making. We first discuss how uncertainty can be quantified and modeled and then show how the probability of rank reversal scales with the number of experts. We consider the impact of various aspects which may affect the estimation of probability of rank reversal in the context of pairwise comparisons, such as the uncertainty level, alternative preference scales and different weight estimation methods. We also consider the case where the comparisons are carried out in a fuzzy manner. It is shown that in most circumstances, augmenting the size of the expert group beyond 15 produces a small change in the probability of rank reversal. We next address the issue of how this probability can be estimated in practice, from information gathered simply from the comparison matrices of a single expert group. We propose and validate a scheme which yields an estimate for the probability of rank reversal and test the applicability of this scheme under various conditions. The framework discussed in the paper can allow decision makers to correctly choose the number of experts participating in a pairwise comparison and obtain an estimate of the credibility of the outcome.     

On pairwise comparison matrices that can be made consistent by the modification of a few elements

Pairwise comparison matrices are often used in Multi-attribute Decision Making for weighting the attributes or for the evaluation of the alternatives with respect to a criteria. Matrices provided by the decision makers are rarely consistent and it is important to index the degree of inconsistency. In the paper, the minimal number of matrix elements by the modification of which the pairwise comparison matrix can be made consistent is examined. From practical point of view, the modification of 1, 2, or, for larger matrices, 3 elements seems to be relevant. These cases are characterized by using the graph representation of the matrices. Empirical examples illustrate that pairwise comparison matrices that can be made consistent by the modification of a few elements are present in the applications.     

An integrated approach for deriving priorities in analytic network process

A multiple objective programming approach for the analytic network process (ANP) is proposed to obtain all local priorities for crisp or interval judgments at one time, even in an inconsistent situation. The weakness of the ANP and fuzzy ANP (FANP) is that the complexity of generating priorities is equal to the number of comparison matrices. In the proposed approach, all sets of crisp priorities for each pairwise comparison matrix can be obtained directly. Moreover, from the outcomes of three examples, the power to reach a limiting supermatrix is less than or equal to the power of the FANP. Thus, the proposed approach can be regarded as an efficient alternative of the fuzzy ANP.     

An intelligent decomposition of pairwise comparison matrices for large-scale decisions

A Pairwise Comparison Matrix (PCM) has been used to compute for relative priorities of elements and are integral components in widely applied decision making tools: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and its generalized form, the Analytic Network Process (ANP). However, PCMs suffer from several issues limiting their applications to large-scale decision problems. These limitations can be attributed to the curse of dimensionality, that is, a large number of pairwise comparisons need to be elicited from a decision maker. This issue results to inconsistent preferences due to the limited cognitive powers of decision makers. To address these limitations, this research proposes a PCM decomposition methodology that reduces the elicited pairwise comparisons. A binary integer program is proposed to intelligently decompose a PCM into several smaller subsets using interdependence scores among elements. Since the subsets are disjoint, the most independent pivot element is identified to connect all subsets to derive the global weights of the elements from the original PCM. As a result, the number of pairwise comparison is reduced and consistency is of the comparisons is improved. The proposed decomposition methodology is applied to both AHP and ANP to demonstrate its advantages.     

A parametric GP model dealing with incomplete information for group decision-making

We consider a group decision-making problem where preferences given by the experts are articulated into the form of pairwise comparison matrices. In many cases, experts are not able to efficiently provide their preferences on some aspects of the problem because of a large number of alternatives, limited expertise related to some problem domain, unavailable data, etc., resulting in incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. Our goal is to develop a computational method to retrieve a group priority vector of the considered alternatives dealing with incomplete information. For that purpose, we have established an optimization problem in which a similarity function and a parametric compromise function are defined. Associated to this problem, a logarithmic goal programming formulation is considered to provide an effective procedure to compute the solution. Moreover, the parameters involved in the method have a clear meaning in the context of group problems.     

An action learning approach for assessing the consistency of pairwise comparison data

Pairwise comparison data are used in various contexts including the generation of weight vectors for multiple criteria decision making problems. If this data is not sufficiently consistent, then the resulting weight vector cannot be considered to be a reliable reflection of the evaluator’s opinion. Hence, it is necessary to measure its level of inconsistency. Different approaches have been proposed to measuring the level of inconsistency, but they are often based on ‘rules of thumb” and/or randomly generated matrices, and are not interpretable. In this paper we present an action learning approach for assessing the consistency of the input pairwise comparison data that offer interpretable consistency measures.     

On qualitatively consistent,transitive and contradictory judgment matrices emerging from multiattribute decision procedures

Several known and newly introduced classes of positive reciprocal matrices emerging from pairwise comparisons in multiattribute decision problems are studied in the paper. Mainly qualitative features in connection with consistency and inconsistency are considered in order to extend the range of the available analytical methods regarding pairwise comparisons. By using graph representation of positive reciprocal matrices, graph theoretic approach is applied for the argumentation. The applied notions and the theorems developed in the paper can be useful for eliminating the illogical data that may occur during pairwise comparisons.     

A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process

The DEAHP method for weight deviation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been found flawed and sometimes produces counterintuitive priority vectors for inconsistent pairwise comparison matrices, which makes its application very restrictive. This paper proposes a new data envelopment analysis (DEA) method for priority determination in the AHP and extends it to the group AHP situation. In this new DEA methodology, two specially constructed DEA models that differ from the DEAHP model are used to derive the best local priorities from a pairwise comparison matrix or a group of pairwise comparison matrices no matter whether they are perfectly consistent or inconsistent. The new DEA method produces true weights for perfectly consistent pairwise comparison matrices and the best local priorities that are logical and consistent with decision makers (DMs)’ subjective judgments for inconsistent pairwise comparison matrices. In hierarchical structures, the new DEA method utilizes the simple additive weighting (SAW) method for aggregation of the best local priorities without the need of normalization. Numerical examples are examined throughout the paper to show the advantages of the new DEA methodology and its potential applications in both the AHP and group decision making.     

A geometric averaging procedure for constructing supertransitive approximation to binary comparison matrices

The usefulness of encoding the fuzzy evaluations of alternatives and the importance weights of criteria, in a multiple objective decision problem through binary comparison matrices (or pairwise judgment matrices) is receiving considerable attention. The methodology for identifying the best alternative in a given decision problem involves the computation of the principal eigenvectors of the binary comparison matrices. The eigenvectors transform the fuzzy evaluations of the importance of the criteria and the ratings of the alternatives into a ratio scale. A difficulty that is often experienced in using this approach in practice, is the inconsistency of the binary evaluations. This paper proposes a simple averaging procedure to construct a supertransitive approximation to a binary comparison matrix, where inconsistency is a problem. It is further suggested that such an adjustment might be necessary to more closely reflect the inherent fuzziness of the evaluations contained in a binary comparison matrix. The procedure is illustrated by means of examples.     

A new approach for weight derivation using data envelopment analysis in the analytic hierarchy process

Recently, some researches have been carried out in the context of using data envelopment analysis (DEA) models to generate local weights of alternatives from pairwise comparison matrices used in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). One of these models is the DEAHP. The main drawback of the DEAHP is that it generates counter-intuitive priority vectors for inconsistent pairwise comparison matrices. To overcome the drawbacks of the DEAHP, this paper proposes a new procedure entitled Revised DEAHP, and it will be shown that this procedure generates logical weights that are consistent with the decision maker's judgements and is sensitive to changes in data of the pairwise comparison matrices. Through a numerical example, it will be shown that the Revised DEAHP not only produces correct weights for inconsistent matrices but also does not suffer from rank reversal when an irrelevant alternative is added or removed.     

The number of feasible designs in a compatibility matrix

Many design and planning problems consist of a number of distinct subsystems. Generally, there are several possible alternatives for design of a subsystem. However, an alternative for one subsystem may be incompatible with an alternative for another subsystem. Thus, a feasible design is one that incorporates one alternative for each subsystem such that no pairwise incompatibilities exist. Several such design and planning problems have been formulated as compatibility matrices. The feasible designs can be identified by using an efficient algorithm. This paper shows that, in general, the exact number of feasible designs decreases exponentially with the increase in the number of incompatible pairs. This finding should motivate more potential users to employ the compatibility matrix approach.     

基于相容性的模糊判断矩阵一致性改进新方法

模糊判断矩阵是决策者给出的一种重要的偏好信息形式。根据模糊判断矩阵互补性的特点,提出一个模糊判断矩阵相容性的指标,并研究模糊判断矩阵相容性和一致性的关系,在此基础上定义了一个模糊判断矩阵与其特征矩阵的偏差矩阵,给出了一致性改进的新方法,最后进行了实例分析,结果表明该方法行之有效。     

基于基本回路修正的AHP一致性调整方法研究

为解决AHP一致性问题,提出一种基于基本回路修正的调整方法,能够同时解决数值不一致和逻辑不一致问题,同时保证对原始信息的修改量最小。数值不一致和逻辑不一致均由决策者的不准确判断引起,其中数值不一致可以通过降低一致性比率(CR)值进行改善,而逻辑不一致只有将判断矩阵中所有三阶回路去除才能得到解决。因此,通过对n阶判断矩阵进行基本矩阵分解,得到C³_n个3阶的基本矩阵,其中存在三阶回路的称为基本回路,从而将判断矩阵的一致性修正问题转化为基本回路的一致性修正问题。通过对基本回路的一致性比较,提出了两种确定最不一致元素的方法,即CR和最大法和优化法,并设计了优化模型对最不一致元素进行修正。最后,通过算例分析验证了本文方法的可行性,与已有方法的对比结论证明了本文方法更为有效。